[000:00:00;00] when she was tested for coronavirus, lyudmila arrestova also assures that she was forced to go to occupied crimea to visit her parents there, however, apparently not only in 2018, she celebrated the birthday of her daughter in a sevastopol cafe. judge lyudmila arrestova has worked in sevastopol since 2001, at first as an assistant prosecutor, later she rose to deputy head of the staff of the local district administrative court in 2013, she was appointed to a position in the court of the donetsk district administrative court after the occupation of donetsk in the 14th year, this court was was transferred to slovyansk before the creation of the higher anti-corruption court, there were almost no sentences for judges in cases of corruption in ukraine, instead, only in the last three years

, more than 20 ministers of themis were brought to justice, they were convicted of corruption , abuse of influence and driving under the influence, and many of the most influential judges who stand for multimillion-dollar corruption schemes and still not punished by all means to tighten the ropes of this thread from medical institutions about those who are sick and cannot come to the meeting, etc., became indicative in the case of judge mykola chaus, he was exposed to a pair of $150,000, back in 2016, but the sentence was passed only in june of this year. this is the same judge who hid money in the garden. in a three-liter jar, he managed to hide from justice for 7 years. he fled to moldova, was in international wanted

, then sat under house arrest, fled from the investigation again, hid in the villages , was allegedly abducted by sbu employees, a real detective, in the end, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced chaus to 10 years of imprisonment with confiscation of property, but the former judge filed an appeal, so this is far from the end of the story, we stand for appeals, if the appeal agrees with the conclusions of the court of first instance , mykola chaus will actually begin serving his sentence behind bars, that's because the decision of the appeal already becomes valid and legal oleksandr tupytsky is accused of committing a number of criminal offenses, including false testimony

combined with the artificial creation of defense evidence, bribing a witness arbitrary seizure of a plot of land on the territory of crimea and even high treason on july 16, 2021, oleksandr tupytskyi received a new suspicion of unauthorized interference in the automated court system , tupytskyi is currently declared wanted , journalists found him in austria last year, he is accused of criminal offenses there and false testimony and incitement that he is currently in vienna, as far as is known from the data of journalists there, it seems that he left as a pensioner

or something, who has three children, ukraine sent the request for extradition of the judge to the house, the fate of this appeal is unknown since december 2016, the former head of the high economic court of the yanukovych era, viktor tatskov, has been wanted. which ukrainian law enforcement officer is charged with crimes in the justice system , in particular, interfering with the automated system of distributing cases, he tactically subordinated the system of making court decisions to himself when yanukovych fled to russia, judge tatkov left for europe and currently lives in vienna, the investigation into his case is ongoing, and he is still being criminalized interference in the self-settlement of cases and the resolution of the case on the order of the business, because the commercial courts actually decided all issues related to some fees between enterprises and businesses, and the former judge does not give up hope not only to avoid justice, but also to wear the judge's

mantle again, he filed numerous lawsuits in in january 2021, the district administrative court of kyiv even reinstated him in his position, later this decision was canceled on the complaint of the higher economic court, however, this is such a precedent that illustrates that even being under investigation for corruption cases and hiding abroad, judges still have power and a lot of leverage, one of the most scandalous judges in the country, the former head of the scandalous district administrative court of kyiv, pavel vovka, has not yet been brought to justice. three years ago, vovka was informed of the suspicion of creating a criminal organization and seized power, he is suspected, among other things, of making custom decisions and seizing power in the judicial system. this is without exaggeration one of

the most high-profile cases in the ukrainian judiciary system and during the years that the investigation has been going on, vovk is not only free and cynically ignores all court hearings, but he has not even been removed from the post of judge, the district administrative court of kyiv headed by him has been liquidated, but pavlo vovk continues to receive a judge's salary and enjoy all the privileges of the minister of themis , in particular judicial immunity when actual complaints were filed there until the beginning of 2022, all these complaints remained unsatisfied by the high council of justice , perhaps in particular because of pavel vovka's connections with former members of the supreme council of justice, however, currently the supreme council of justice does not consider disciplinary proceedings and

dismiss a judge precisely because of a disciplinary offense, if they do this , it will give hope that the consideration of these complaints will lead to a decision on his dismissal recently, the head of the supreme court of ukraine, vsevolod knyazev, was arrested for a bribe of almost 3 million dollars. he was immediately taken into custody with an unaffordable bail of 75 million uah. the former judge is still in pre-trial detention, so there is a possibility that at least this case will be investigated and quickly brought to a verdict , for today all this was under judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system or you want to tell about an unscrupulous judge, write to me on facebook or to the e- mail address of which you

you see on your screens, we'll meet in exactly a week, everything is fine, there are discounts on kombispasm and kombispasm gastrocomfort 10% in pharmacies podorozhnyk bam and savings so that ukrainians don't think about so that they don't talk in the first place, it still works out war war and our victory only on espresso from monday to monday completely different spheres of human activity sports health politics return of crimea military analytics nine presenters journalists experts opinion leaders in real time about the most current events through the prism of war in

author's projects on espresso hello this is freedom in the morning, the informational project of radio svoboda, guests are here every day, this is the shipping district of kherson, we are on live, we are somewhere in the wheels of bahmut, we tell the main thing on weekdays at 9:00, de-occupation is possible unsurpassed the history of the liberated cities of ukraine went let's see how our brothers helped us, they freed us from a normal life, we freed them from the normal technology of pro-russian inhumans , it was terrible, it was very terrible, every day, one by one, two houses were burned, and

the natsiks of the ukrainian people are here. yes, we are all nationalists here, did the people resist, the residents left stopped here and sent back and became heroes the novel was still and will always be ukraine about unbreakable cities of ukraine from the project ukrainian documentary series de-occupation every saturday at 11:10 on espresso there is a war going on and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds russia is throwing millions of naftodors to turn ukrainians into little russians ukraine will become russia analysis and analysis of information about ukraine by russian propagandists concrete facts and methods by which hostile propaganda turns people into obedient zombies to information attacks russians in the information war chronicle project

with olga len tuesday thursday friday at 17:10 on espresso tv channel vasyl zima's long broadcast my name is vasyl zima two hours of air time 2 hours of your time will be to talk about the most important things for two hours to learn about the war, serhiy zhoretska joins our broadcast, military summaries of the day and what is the world like? what in the world will yury fizer tell for two hours to stay up to date with the economic news of radio broadcasters, oleksandr movchantsi. he tells us about the economy during the war and new sports evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters , about culture during the war, he is ready to talk about the war or something else. mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us some optimism, and we will also have a respectable studio hotel today, volodymyr grishko, if all goes well, the events of the day in two hours

, vasyl zimi's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening , the most stupidly stupid of ukraine to the european union, and what we see here is the government the president who talks so much about the fight against the oligarchs they did not submit any law on this topic to the parliament, again everything is done by the hands of deputies from the monomajority who submit completely unprofessional , completely unprofessional laws in all in european countries, the members have a senate. the fight against the excessive influence of oligarchs who have monopolies on political processes in the state is limited precisely to the strengthening of the anti-monopoly committee, but what are we talking about now when we discuss this bill on the creation of a new repressive machine when

the anti-monopoly committee will receive extraneous functions such as as the prosecutor 's office, such as sap cartridges and other power structures , instead of, on the contrary, fighting the oligarchs with the mechanisms that are still in place in this structure, please tell me what it is ok, what now, when you talk about the fight against the oligarchs from the state budget from leiden, where there is no money that completely depends on our partners, you pay the oligarchs for tv channels in marathon , read the devastating conclusion of the european commission, which says that there can be no club in the form of a- and the national security and defense council, which is supposed to politicize these processes , the oligarchs must be removed from their influence on the processes in the state. and what is happening today ? when we hear that privatbank, which is already

state-owned, says that it will not receive e revenues from gas stations belonging to oligarchs when we have today the system of sanctions imposed by the united states on ukrainian oligarchs is not synchronized with the ukrainian system of sanctions because the authorities do not notice these oligarchs and that is why it is actually very important that vla does not lie about what you say the nazi commission said that the absolute senseless law on oligarchs that you so loudly accepted here. and it should only be postponed until the end of martial law . this is not true . to you that the law on oligarchs has nothing to do with the fight against oligarchs, it is a political bill, but to fight against oligarchs, you need to first synchronize the sanctions of the united states with ukrainian sanctions and finally introduce sanctions against ukrainian oligarchs. by the way , the 1+1 channel belongs to oligarchs and substation

persons in particular for the second time, mr. medvedchuk really needs to stop the influence of the oligarchs , including on this session hall. ukrainians , when you see what is happening here, do not be surprised. why is that? because we are not the majority after all, you know how the patchwork is formed from er, well, in the countries where the oligarchs were delegated here, people without a name, without a reputation, without professional er, understanding of the processes of how to manage the state came to this list 250 and now they absolutely vote the same way when they were told no reading the essence of the law, including about the oligarchs. it was these people who voted to give uah 2 billion to the oligarchs for oligarchic tv channels that tell all good things about the government and not a single word about what is really happening in the parliament, but what are the laws here it is necessary to pass, including the law on the antimonopoly committee, our faction will introduce amendments that will normalize this draft law

, which absolutely does not meet the 5%, and we must clean out all the repressive requirements of the european union to the law and those. iryna volodymyrivna allow me a few words i still i would like to ask you without insults towards any factions, this is the basis of the worldview of any people's deputy, even with a lot of experience, thank you dear colleagues in the next graduations of ivan orestivna 5 minutes please dear mr. chairman, dear colleagues, i will tell you, perhaps for those who do not read the conclusions of the venice commission, a little secret. the venice commission decided

that the so-called de-oligarchization bill promoted by ukraine has nothing to do with de-oligarchization, and proposed to postpone its implementation until after the end of martial law. it was so diplomatically proposed by the venice commission. but at the same time, the venice commission appealed and the european commission appealed to georgia and moldova, which copied the draft law or other law in ukraine to immediately cancel them, which suggests that the same fate will befall this pr action that was approved by a-a in this council and with which the executive power of ukraine was so carried away. at the same time , the venice commission emphasized that

ukraine should really bring anti -monopoly legislation into line with european legislation, the ukrainian parliament, again, for some reason, not at the initiative of the government, which would seem very strange , it should have been the initiative of the government, this one is working the draft law that you and i are considering now, only our committee on the integration of ukraine into the european union considered the decision three times and analyzed this draft law before the second reading, because the specialized committee reviewed it, if i am not mistaken, eight times, and by this time we have now brought it to the hall the bill that i am emphasizing between the first and second reading became, despite the fact that it is with a flag, directly contradicting the law of the european union, it became

directly contradicting our international legal obligations in the field of european integration i would like to remind you that this is one of the bills that we have to pass in order for colleagues to implement and implement qualitatively. those amendments that will now be heard and given that they are not confirmed and i really hope that this hall is able to show responsibility and maturity in connection with the responsibility that is before us

for the positive conclusion of the european commission regarding the beginning of the opening of victory and one more thing, colleagues, with this bill we for some reason decided to grant extraordinary powers to the antimonopoly committee, extraordinary from the point of view of creating another actual law enforcement monster that will have certain responsibilities that will overlap with other law enforcement structures and not at the same time with this draft law, we do not propose any institutional mechanism to ensure the independence of this fact body, and this means that this body can be used as a political tool of pressure, as an economic tool of pressure against e-e competitors, against opponents and so on, therefore , colleagues, in my opinion, this draft law should be sent for a repeated second reading to bring it really into line with

the norms of the european union and then approve and then look honestly in the eyes of ukrainian voters that we have really done everything that was expected of us in terms of introducing real competition in ukraine and the mechanism that will be to ensure compliance with this competition. i hope for the prudence and wisdom of this hall. thank you. dear colleagues, look at me. first, everyone will speak and after that we will put amendments . please, 5 minutes, kucherenko, then six minutes , mr. violent, and then we will move on to amendments from the beginning of the amendment on e taking into account and then for confirmation 5 minutes, please oleksiy yuriyovych kucherenko thank you oleksiy kucherenko faction fatherland dear presiding dear colleagues, i am very rational today, i will try even

i will not save these 5 minutes and use them first only to listen to the excellent speech of my colleague limpochkinsadze and practically all the arguments . history, i myself got confused in these bills , one second, third, fourth appears , they are canceled and so on, this is not systematic work on vaccinations, sorry, i want my colleagues to take constructive criticism answer from the relevant committee i am asking a simple question, and what other powers do you lack, dear antimonopoly colleagues , we all understand here, no one needs to be convinced to campaign for competition legislation for anti-real politics, we are all for this, well, go out and ask any average person so that i don't use zhytomyr, what does he think

about the utility monopoly, he will give you the answer, ha ha ha , what are you going to do with me? keep asking any businessman, small, medium, large. by the way , i draw your attention to a methodical error, we do not we are discussing the oligarchs in this law, we are discussing the antimonopoly legislation and compliance with the competition legislation , what is the point of the oligarchs in general, the principle is so, i will continue, ask the small and medium-sized one who somehow sighs and faces the activities of the antimonopoly committee. well, i don't think there will be many positive evaluations. i know that in my report the anti-monopoly committee reported that it was our as much as 300 million hryvnias of some kind of fines there, uh, he filled the budget, well , you know such a controversial argument, as well as their colleagues from the ncrcp, in the same way instead of transparently e-e regulation of monopoly decided that their task is to fill the budget with fines and it is not the main function and the main function is to ensure non-stop e-e compliance

with the anti-monopoly policy in these conditions when in fact the committee did not use the powers it has today, it is a tradition in ukrainian, he demands and asks us to give him new emergency powers and powers , there is a search, an investigation, a wiretapping, and so on and so on. well, friends, what is stopping you from recognizing naftogaz as a monopoly for four years, finally, because it is such a thing? understand so that we can it is normal to work with oil and gas, to make it finally transparent, to do an audit in order to understand what an economically justified price for gas is, and so you and the tariffs are all calm down. but follow the algorithm, no , you do n’t do that. to the committee, the same applies to the name monopoly of other markets. this is iryna gas, we just talked about it, it is the energy markets, it is

the housing-community markets, and so on and so on, and i want to finish by saying one thing friends, let's not fool each other. we really need a depoliticized, professional, equidistant body . what does it start with, that no official or even a non-official, because in the office of the president there are no officials, you understand, not a single official or cabinet minister, either from the verkhovna rada or from the office of the president can even afford to think. call the leadership of the antimonopoly committee of the regulator of another and give some sorry tough parade what not to do what not to do as in the example with ukrnafta there and other battles there which today they are deploying well, at least once you can send someone who is calling you these customers and say no, i am the head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, i am acting in

the interests of ukraine, and i will report you to the dbr. what else, when their leaders will meet their positions and their civil and official duties, that 's why, friends, i don't know about this bill . we don't see anything useful there, and that's why it won't be supported it is necessary to start with what is there, implement the current existing law, which, unfortunately, on vaccinations, unfortunately, it is not observed, thank you, yes, dear colleagues, let's give six minutes of noise and after that, more than no one will speak , after that we can move on to amendments and drills between how many minutes 1 minute burbych burmich one minute please greetings dear colleagues i congratulate everyone on today's holiday and

you know what i want to say to you that ukrainian statehood begins with each of us and first of all it begins with this hall and this it is very significant that we are considering such an important reform today, because statehood begins with how we, as the verkhovna rada of ukraine, carry out the process of reforming state institutions, how we adhere to democratic and transparent procedures, and i will tell you why i am emphasizing this now four years ago how only we took office as a specialized sub-committee , the economic development committee on equal conditions for business and competitive policy began the process of preparing this reform and as a result of this

preparation, international partners became the registration of the first draft law on 27.30, which has not yet been considered by the specialized committee, although it was registered in january 2020. instead of taking this complex reform and accepting it to finalize it and make a successful case, we saw the beginning of a behind-the-scenes struggle in the worst soviet and post-soviet traditions which have dominated the ukrainian political community for the past 30 years , alternative draft laws began to be registered one after the other, which in fact partly repeat draft law 2730, but they everyone does not take into account one of the most important things, the main sign of the independence of the regulator, who has a quasi-judicial function of a colleague and is actually the referee on the market who has to whistle a red card and say who to remove from the field

of the ukrainian economy, at the moment it has not been decided whether he should be appointed in an independent way, namely the order appointment and financial independence of the regulator are these two foundations on which the reform rests were excluded from this stage of the reform, and i would very much like to see such an important european integration david arkami was present in the hall of the draft law, but unfortunately he was not there to confirm that as a proposal it is possible for the majority, we have divided this reform into two parts, that it is this reform that the majority will vote for the second, more complex political part of it, where will we change the order of appointment , we will change the procedure for appointing state officials and make this institution really independent, if not, then all

the risks that colleagues have already mentioned, and i can emphasize, we have been fighting with the scumbag for many years, we will get it now to a greater extent in the powers of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, which today are not balanced by anything, because no comments from the market, from experts, from experts from the business association were taken into account, the position of gneo was not taken into account, the position of the committee on european integration was not taken into account, therefore, colleagues, when we continue for the fourth year in a row this turbo regime, let's remember that we are responsible for how we reform the country, for whether we adhere to the old principles , for which the armed forces of ukraine are fighting today and our people are dying and if we continue