[000:00:00;00] and i can emphasize that we have been fighting with the wasteful porridge for many years, we will now receive it in a larger amount in the powers of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, which today are not balanced by anything, because no comments from the market, from experts, from experts from the business of the association were taken into account, the position of gneu was not taken into account the position of the committee on european integration was not taken into account, therefore, colleagues, when we continue this turbo mode for the fourth year in a row, let's remember that we are responsible for how we are we reforming the country, but do we adhere to the washed-up principles for which the armed forces of ukraine are fighting today and our people are dying, and if we continue to have backroom discussions before opening

the decisions of the committee for the second reading three or four times, introducing amendments agreed in closed offices behind closed doors it is unknown with whom and unknown by whom we will not be able to qualitatively build a democratic system in the state and will not develop institutions that are the very guarantee of our integration into the european union and nato, which should ensure at this stage equal conditions for equal conditions for entering the market of all players of all businesses and getting rid of the political influence of oligarchs , that is exactly what we are fighting for, but these are the moments and this draft law does not correspond to that, colleagues. we have all the prepared materials in order to finalize it

qualitatively . political will archamia political will will be for the second stage of the reform, i ask you to confirm this, thank you dear colleagues , please one minute burmich, please dear chairman dear colleagues of course you can call a hare a wolf and a hare a wolf, but the essence of this does not change, you can call this law european integration, but i think that if we accept it, we can also be expelled from the association , because today the antimonopoly committee has enough leverage and powers to effectively carry out its work , for which it is intended as a regulator of providing antimonopoly of the committee of law enforcement functions, it is not that it is not constitutional, it is illegal and absurd, there are

no such functions in any country , in any world, therefore, we believe that this is not this not that one, that one, not us, not the essence and not the name by which it is called, that's why the group for the restoration of ukraine will not support this draft law , thank you dear colleagues thank you, it means that everyone who wished spoke, now we can make more speeches, we will not be able to go now , i apologize dear colleagues, if everyone spoke

now let's move on to the amendment. well, yes , yes, let me apologize for one minute of butter, please. no, don't put it. please give your speech. the procedural code provides for a number of measures to be taken by the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, including seizure of property, description of property, and so on, and unfortunately, in my opinion, the rules were not correctly prescribed, because the procedure for canceling this seizure of property is not foreseen , the consequences of the appeal of this property are not foreseen, we had a conversation with chairman of the specialized committee and about his speech, i will ask you to confirm that uh , since this draft law will enter into force on january 1 next year, then until then

, the specialized committee on policy issues will prepare the appropriate amendments to the economic procedural code, they must be supported in the hall and the introduction of amendments that take into account these essential remarks is sufficient. 3 minutes klymenko yulia leonidivna dear colleagues, yes, i have this law. there are many questions, many corrections , in fact, i had more er, i will not put them. no, not taken into account, no on confirmation, i will only say that the law is quite raw and, as we talked with the head of the antimonopoly committee, it requires not only the second stage, but also the finalization of the first stage, since, unfortunately, it does not take into account the interests of small and medium-sized businesses

, it does not have clear procedures in what way, with the development of the economy, small and medium-sized businesses will be subject to antimonopoly legislation, and the main issue is the fight against oligarchs, because it is more reminiscent of, let's say, imitation fight against the oligarchs than actually fight against the oligarchs , that's why the law is there. yes, we have to adopt it in accordance with the obligations that ukraine took upon itself for joining the european union and receiving macro-financial assistance, but unfortunately, the law will not solve any problems what is it that stands before us, namely the removal of the oligarchs, the removal of the oligarchs from power in many sectors, the economy of ukraine is not developing not only because there is a war going on in ukraine, or because

, for example, we have expensive lending, but because most sectors of the economy, which are profitable and interesting for investors, are actually monopolized by individual business groups and individual people , let's say so, and unfortunately this leads to the fact that small and medium-sized businesses cannot find , cannot develop, cannot transition from micro- small in maz small in medium medium large this is a big problem for the future economy especially this is a big problem for ukraine that is why antimonopoly legislation, as we remember, was the basis for growth and in general for the development of the economy for example, in the united states of america, after the adoption of antitrust legislation, the economy of the united states began to develop at an incredible pace for us, and antimonopoly legislation is fundamental for the development of the economy. unfortunately, the option

proposed by the committee and proposed by the authors does not solve any of these problems and does not fight the oligarchs does not allow small and medium-sized businesses to have access to e-e monopolistic sectors and does not really answer the question of how we will fight monopolists in the market in in the future post-war ukraine, we have a great risk of the formation of new oligarchs in war-time ukraine, because we see that they have already begun to form. were not taken into account aimed at the implementation of one of the key tests

of the presidential candidate volodymyr zelenskyi's program on strengthening the power of the people, and the actual problem is that ukrainian consumers and associations consumers generally do not have the opportunity to get involved in disputes initiated by the antimonopoly committee, and there was a quite logical position that received the support of all factions a in the working group about what let's do, strengthen the role of consumers and their association in their own disputes , because it is strange, but for example, when firtash rips off through gas monopoly of consumers consumers have no opportunity to protect themselves through the antimonopoly committee, it is extremely surprising that the entire complex of these laws was banally

excluded from the draft law, not supported and as if i was a promise, a promise that it will happen in some second package of changes, well, this is nonsense, friends. we have to defend the interests of those who elected us, who sent us to the parliament , so i will not delay the confirmation, but without consumer protection and the antimonopoly committee as a proper mechanism for consumers, this the reform is doomed, therefore, of course, we will not support it. thank you . dear colleagues, they have finished their speeches. no one else wants to speak on their amendments. of amendments to be taken into account by the faction of the european solidarity, who will put i don't see ivan orestivna, please dear

colleagues, amendment number 133, the wording proposed by e-e is proposed to be adopted today , it gives the antimonopoly committee really very significant powers, in particular, to conduct an inspection of the service premises of vehicles, to seize, to impose an arrest on objects , documents, various information carriers that can be evidence in the case, the amendment that i propose, and i propose, is not intended to be your amendment. please look carefully, mine now, just a second, colleagues, we'll figure it out, my fedienko tables are partially taken into account, i'll look at the table, but

i have the table printed out, and it's 130, just now , then, just a second, let's take a look. look for a second and what is ivan's amendment orestivna about, please turn on the microphone about what i propose to provide by law in what way the antimonopoly committee a can conduct these searches and can have additional powers regarding conducting inspections of service premises of vehicles and so on. this is amendment 137, it is really rejected by the committee, it is your authorship. amendment 137 dear colleagues , please position the committee. thank you very much. inspections, this

draft law in the latest version makes quite significant changes that limit the potential excess of authority by the antimonopoly committee, and what are the decisions of the court, that is, and not the antimonopoly committee, exclusively by decision with the permission of the court, will be able to carry out appropriate measures in the opinion of the authors and on e-e from the point of view of general practice and european and american, this is enough to guarantee with the objects of the investigation of the antimonopoly committee compliance with the procedure in the process in the process of appropriate actions and the monopoly committee thank you dear colleagues 137 - amendment of the authorship of klympush sensation ivan reysne it was rejected by the committee the author insists on taking into account

the arguments of the parties heard i will put it on vote 137 amendment, please vote for 84, no decision has been made, ivan ovets, start with the number , we will look, it still matches, please, the number of the next one. to provide an opportunity for the antimonopoly committee to receive any information, including what constitutes a banking, notary , bank, notary, other secret of such powers, there is no body at all that currently receives there even for by a court decision a-a access to banking secrets even the same tax service must clearly indicate for what period of time for

which account the information was to be provided, i.e. not just any information and there are certain restrictions , so i propose my amendment in terms of providing bank secret information, clarify which bank secret can be disclosed. and this information regarding transactions on the accounts of a specific legal ivan orekhina is the 320th amendment , the 320th amendment, the position of the committee on the 320th amendment. the antimonopoly committee's access to bank secrecy was the subject of a fairly serious discussion, including a discussion between two independent antimonopoly regulators , the national bank of ukraine, a meeting was held at which they agreed on the wording of the amendment regarding the antimonopoly committee's separate access to banking information, this access is quite limited, but sufficient for the antimonopoly committee to conduct its functions

, respectively, the amendment, which is consensual in the editorial office of the national bank and the antimonopoly committee, is taken into account in the text of this draft law, your amendment was rejected because the amendment agreed with the national bank of ukraine was taken into account. thank you, dear colleagues. the 320th amendment was authored by klym pushkinsatsiya. it was rejected by the committee . you have heard the arguments. please vote for the 320th amendment for 77. the decision has not been made. next, please , number two. i think that this is already correct . please note that the authors of the draft law propose to provide the antimonopoly committee with the opportunity to conduct inspections, impose

arrests, seize documents from places of residence and other possessions of a person, which means that the antimonopoly committee can come to any apartment, any private house , not to mention the fact that it is looking for any violations in the field of economic competition protection, which is absolutely unacceptable , even law enforcement agencies cannot afford this again after all, without a court decision, and i am surprised that this amendment was rejected. i believe that the antimonopoly committee should not conduct such checks on a person's place of residence. yes, this is indeed amendment 402. please, the committee's position in brief thank you very much, this is one of the most pressing topics of this draft law, the fact is that as of today , the antimonopoly committee both de facto and de jure already has the authority to carry out inspections, but these authorities are not detailed and not laid out, that is, the procedure as it is an extra-procedural body, since it is a separate

independent regulator, it is not covered by the scope of the procedural codes, accordingly, this draft law details and regulates the procedures for conducting such inspections and sets out certain red flags. that is, we can carry out checks from the general. we go to the special to the specific. we can go to the specific to the specific, in what way , what does this entail, and what is an inspection, so this amendment, your amendment was rejected from the point of view of giving details of the inspection of the antimonopoly committee, and not leaving it to the discretion of their internal regulation thank you, dear colleagues. amendment 402 klympush sensation , it was rejected by the committee. you heard the position of the parties. i ask you to vote for

76. the decision has not been taken. next, ivan, in order, i propose to leave article 22 of the law. in the version in which it currently exists in the current legislation, since the antimonopoly committee for some reason decided to grant itself such powers as a demand or a written challenge to provide explanations by business entities, it is interesting how the antimonopoly committee will demand or summon some representatives of legal entities or possibly others representatives to provide written explanations, this is not the sbu, this is not the sbu or other law enforcement agencies in european structures, e.e., antimonopoly agencies in european countries, there are no such powers er, corresponding analogs to our mk, therefore, i would suggest leaving the version of the article of the current law on the antimonopoly committee

in the form it is today. dear colleagues . 284 amendment of the authorship of pushkin's minutes. it was rejected by the committee. i ask you to vote for 61. the decision has not been made. dear colleagues , ask for agenda items. completed for today. thank you all for your productive work . now i announce a break in our plenary meeting, the time and place of its continuation will be notified to you in advance. together with victory and glory to ukraine, if you find yourself in a flood zone and cannot leave on your own, wait for evacuation, collect your things and climb as high as you can to the upper floors or attic , signal your location follow the messages and follow all the instructions

of the emergency services keep calm and take care of one another about one, don't overfill the rescue equipment, we will stand in line, we will win, glory to ukraine, dear people's deputies of ukraine, in accordance with the resolution adopted by us on some issues of the organization work of the verkhovna rada of ukraine 9 convocations during the ninth session under the conditions of martial law today we continue our plenary session dear people's deputies according to the parliamentary tradition i propose to start work with the performance of the national anthem

of ukraine ukraine lord god

god bless you dear people's deputies of ukraine already over for 17 months, the heroic struggle of the ukrainian people against full-scale criminal russian aggression has been going on. every day, our soldiers make efforts at the cost of their own health , and destroy the occupiers. the personnel and equipment of the enemy are returning the ukrainian flag in the liberation of the city and village, let's observe a moment of silence in memory of the defenders who died for the bright future of ukraine, as well as peaceful citizens who died as a result of the criminal actions

of the terrorist state

. amen , dear colleagues, yesterday, july 26, the senate of the republic of italy passed a decision on the recognition of the famine of 1932-1933 as genocide of the ukrainian people . justice and honoring the memory of millions of innocent victims of the ukrainian holodomor dear people's deputies, today in ukraine is celebrated the day of medical workers and women workers, a professional holiday of people with a big heart, deep knowledge and skillful hands in peaceful life, and especially in times of trials, the most precious human life often depends on them always on the front line , self-confidently providing help, saving, comforting and giving hope, let's congratulate all

medical workers with applause, thank them for their hard work, wish them good health excerpts and a peaceful sky, dear people's deputies at the conciliation council

. we agreed before the start of consideration of the issues on the agenda to allow three minutes for the speeches of the authorized representatives of the parliamentary factions and groups. i ask the representatives of the parliamentary factions of the groups to sign up for the speech. antonina kirimivna deputies group for the restoration of ukraine i ask you to pass the floor to valeria hnatenko hnatenko dear mr. chairman dear colleagues the ukrainian people continue to demonstrate indomitability and indomitability with titanic work and, thanks to the efforts of our troops, they are gradually freeing the ukrainian land from uninvited guests. huge gratitude and respect to every defender of ukraine for their personal

contribution and will to victory . cluster munitions against civilians are being launched in the east. and how did it happen on monday in the city of kostyantynivka in the donetsk region children died is not more terrible that children are dying again, it is the unprotected growth of our population, our younger generation is the most unprotected from the horrors of war and the verkhovna rada must do everything to strengthen the social protection of our children who suffered from aggression last month, together with you, we made a significant contribution in this direction taking as a basis draft law 9042/1 at the same time, i emphasize that the exposition of the norms is completely insufficient, the document focuses only on minor victims during such

a large-scale war. unfortunately, the war did not start in we have been recording the 22nd year since the 14th year, and the ukrainian donbas has been experiencing all this horror for 9 years. we have to cover all ukrainian children affected by this aggression , moreover, in ukraine there is a separate status of children of war who need to cover the victim since 2014, our children deputatska the recovery group of ukraine initiated project 942 to expand the status of children of war and proposed appropriate amendments to the adoption of the law 90-42:1 we call on the verkhovna rada to support this conceptual and principled position we must ensure justice and guaranteeing social protection for all children. who really needs it? if the question of funds stands in the way of this, then the answer is simple , everyone needs to choose their priorities, and the president

recently stated that security, defense , social protection - this is the first thing that should be banned. cities do not count more than uah 200,000 to build fountains and parks. this is just a betrayal of ordinary people and those who have extra money. i propose to go with me to the east tomorrow donetsk region and talk to the people who live there today. look at how they live and ukrainians do everything they can to support each other. in return, the officials have entered the golden age and are now proud of this. we should direct everyone to skorokhod, please. and to the kostyantynivna group, the party for the future