[000:00:00;00] according to parity, according to the amount used by the russian federation, it should be printed. well, well, that is, not just some abstract words . we will support you, we will provide you with assistance packages, which assistance. well, there will be javelins, for example. no, so that it is clearly understood if russia uses, for example , 1,000 a-a artillery barrels of caliber 152, it must be in some other agreement, they are bilateral. it must be clearly stated how many in such a case ukraine will receive similar how many types of weapons? well, for example, of course, let's say the 155 caliber is much more accurate and it certainly behaves more effectively on the battlefield, and it is definitely not necessary to have 1,000 against 1,000, but it is definitely necessary to understand that if the russians have thousands, then we should have at least 300 400 relevant artillery barrels , this will have to be prescribed. for example, a country clearly understands what resource capabilities it has , for example, the united states, and it is prescribed that

according to the agreement, if there are such and such needs, we will be guaranteed to provide you with no relation to the fact that we are there let’s say that we conditionally agree with you and that’s all, that is, the legal fixation of the same military aid, well, it’s clear that even if you know, you won’t tell me, i won’t drink about what well, it will be in the documents that ukraine will sign it is one-sided with the united states and in fact in 19 countries already today, president zelenskyi said that they supported the declaration of guarantees here, but can we trace the logic correctly? first, on october 11 , 22nd, the presentation of zelenskyi speaking in front of the leaders of the big seven, he announced the peace formula that they received for processing, as, for example, the diplomats told for familiarization, and then there was some non-public feedback, now these negotiations and

security guarantees from the big seven are a continuation of this track of the peace formula that was developed in kyiv in the office of the president which the president presented to his partners in order for us to win this war, it is all one line of events . you can say that if you just look at this situation, it is one line, but for me it is a much deeper process. see what first of all, there is the institutionalization of the subjectivity of the sovereignty of the military capacity of ukraine, the institutionalization of this must be recorded in specific legal documents, what ukraine can count on, what types of support from the point of view of protecting its sovereignty, that is, it will be institutionalized, we have a problem, for example well, for example, seven with the russian federation once again and we already have the relevant documents that guarantee us a certain amount of weapons. clearly, we can even stop talking about it. she has

be recorded the second situation well why is it much deeper it integrates us already today integrates the signing of these e-e legal documents is not just we handed you something there because we want to do it and the signing itself is legal - it is mutual e-e obligations that take ukraine is taking over the partner countries and we are already becoming, in essence , a collective member of the security community, it does not have a language. well, it does not have a language, that is, it is not a collective member of nato, but in the meantime, in the meantime, these are already certain mutual guarantees, you understand that is, we take responsibility for what we will do with these weapons, we are given samples of the weapons that we will need accordingly, and in this way, on the one hand, we institutionalize all this, and on the other hand , we integrate already accordingly into a certain active body, a conditional collective body is it seems to me that there is a different philosophy, that is , at the beginning of this war, ukraine was almost one -on-one against the russian federation. yes, then a pro-ukrainian coalition was formed, and they began

to transfer certain weapons, but it was at the expense of after all, the agreements are bilateral between the presidents of the country, yes, that is, it was not guaranteed to us before the start of the war , well, that is, we were on our own. let's put it this way, today we are already laying down at the expense of these bilateral agreements, at least we are laying down the specifics regarding the fact that we will not be alone if we will have certain problems with russia. but again, i always say certain problems with russia. i can't understand which russia we will win the war with, where russia will be . it seems to me that russia will have to be rebranded in general. they have to come up with some another name. they should reduce in size. they should change their rhetoric. they should go to court trials and so on . to me, their flag is already the one to return to. the flag is white . yes, it means that they will have a white flag there and so on. this is a normal process. i i want you and i to be aware of the fact that our key task is why we cannot break down in the middle, already understanding what price we pay , because today it will be possible to finally

resolve the issue of russia. if we do not resolve the issue of russia today in such a way as it exists, this will mean that until the end of the existence of mankind, it will be in this form in russia, uh, in the context of moscow, but not just moscow, moscow city, yes, we observe that there is a magnet in a certain building, it is obvious to drones. how do you think this process will be reflected in society and in power, because it’s not a government quarter, but there are certain government departments there, it’s a great signal for the russians and for the russian authorities, it’s absolutely great, of course, ukraine is not attacking the territory of the russian federation. you know, yes, but the number of these drones that will attack will increase accordingly. the first was the phase of testing the anti -missile defense systems of the russian federation, including in the capital region, it was found out that there is no anti-missile defense there, and therefore, after the testing of the first stage, the second stage, what is

the scaling of the attacks, what is this the attack showed twice in the same place, er, the place was hit. we don't know what hit there, well, a certain drone and so on, it showed that these are all controlled operations, absolutely controlled, which will be carried out if, er, let's tell the people who will carry out these operations, it will be necessary to destroy some target, they will do it even in the center of moscow , this is what ordinary citizens of moscow saw there. look what the disposition was today after the failed prigozhin establishment, it was clear that there is no power vertical, which is accordingly ready to block manifestations of protest with weapons and they showed that there is no putin, there is no well, this is not a leader, well , definitely a person who runs away and hides and so and before that i was selling myself to a great match and so on. well, it’s nonsense today to look at putin and seriously perceive him as a man. well, i mean as

a man who can hold a blow, a mood for seconds, and if such are the other components and these drones they show that they finally prove nothing. everything is illusory, and therefore you can internally attack anyone , anywhere and destroy any targets. our 30 seconds have come to an end. mykhailo. thank you for being with us. thank you thank you today the tv channel rada rada rada us security and defense in front of me is the secretary of the national security council oleksiy danielov p oleksiy i congratulate you, i welcome you very often in the western media. unfortunately, messages appear that the ukrainian offensive is slow, that it is lagging behind the schedule, tell me, is there such a schedule, or our partners they set some deadlines for us by giving us weapons. well, first of all, no one can set deadlines for us. first of all, secondly, there is no schedule . thirdly, when such conversations begin, we

mean that people who are not understand what war is, unfortunately, it happened that the situation was overheated regarding the events taking place at the front, and to use the phrase counteroffensive, i have never done this, but there are military operations, they are complex and difficult, it depends on many factors . that is why even today our boys and girls carry out their tasks on the front line, they perform it in contrast to the conditions that exist today, the information company is being dispersed, who is interested, well, first of all , let's analyze who is talking about what i emphasize once again that on the a-a front in the war, there cannot be any deadline regarding what needs to be done today. there is the first, the second, the third . it depends on their circumstances, which are directly on one or another part of the front , and we have the nato system, it is already working,

the commander decides which the way we act in this or that direction, taking into account the general task that has become the main task for us is the preservation of life, including our people, our people who are at the front, we have an understanding that in the mountains there is a very powerful prepared for these events, that is huge the number of territories mined, what is the number of mines in the territory that must be served to our military, it is simply crazy , but today there is an understanding that on average 3-4-5 minuses are located on one square meter, can you imagine what a difficult and difficult job it is to remove it so that after that it would be possible to move our military and if earlier there was hope that this could be done thanks to the equipment provided by partners, today there are a lot of areas of the front where our units are on foot

at night they do very difficult hard work. this must be understood. i emphasize once again that it concerns some deadlines that are written about in some events in the mass media. the kremlin says that they will sink all ships that enter our ports near our shores or near our shores , but there is no activity, on the other hand, there is nothing near the shores of the russian novorossiysk it has changed, as they were active and still are, although our recruiters made a mirror statement, it turns out that they do not take us seriously , this is not what we need to talk about. the fact is that these are international rules for the use of waters , which are international, and when russia flouts all international law, including number and maritime law. keep in mind that this is contempt not only for us from russia - it is

new for the entire world society. the fact is that no ship can go there because russia wants it for russia of course it will end very, very badly, but the question is only a matter of time. well, we would very much like everything to end very quickly , but we live in such conditions that every country has its own vision of the development of one or another events that also affect the end of our victory in this war, so we can confirm our statements when we say that we will perceive those vessels as military targets. well, you know, we periodically do not confirm what we confirm. but we loudly confirm with our actions that our military puts inviolability many objects that were considered to be 100% protected in russia, this is the crimean bridge , which was spoken about by the representatives of our

security service directly, which took part in the first, second case, this is what the situation about which the president of ukraine emphasized that the war will return to the territory of russia and if you have seen certain events that periodically take place directly in moscow. keep in mind that russian partisans. let's call them that. they work perfectly on the territory of the russian federation. we'll talk later. about these interesting partisans, the russian military-industrial complex produces and manufactures about a hundred missiles of various types per month, more than 11,000 drones of the fp-v type only. and what about our serial production of drones, why is ukroboronprom not engaged in it, i can say when you give such numbers, there must be be very attentive and careful, especially what concerns the 11,000 when you do such a thing. keep in mind that today there is a huge competition that russia

is spreading all over the world that they have a powerful military and industrial potential that they produce a lot of things that these sanctions are of no use to them, that they bypass everything, they deal with it, in fact, this is not entirely true, so today there is an understanding that uh, one of the countries, namely iran , helps the russian federation, and they jointly produce those means damage that attacks our civilian population, our children, that is what concerns our own production, you know that we have a deployed program of cartridges and, uh, our manufacturers, uh, in a rather large number of various means of destruction. already produce it is not an easy task, it is not easy devices that require certain equipment from countries, but not all components are produced on the territory of our country , in addition, it is necessary to understand that there must also be

an engineering opinion, so there must be means of protection against skirmishes and many other things which are not trifles in this case. that's why this issue is being worked on when we say that ukroboronprom should be doing everything, we mean this kind of sovietism, here we have to remember where ukroboronprom came from in the first place. that's why we have its own time during the time of yanukovych. well, they set up such an institution, if you can put it that way, which , unfortunately, did not always do the things it should have done. but i can say that if we are in market conditions , if we are in a free world, if we are moving there where should we go? 90% of all things must be produced by private companies

, and we are already moving towards that. we are dealing with this issue . we can always talk about ourselves publicly, including certain restrictions that exist during the war, the flow or others, of course, but keep in mind, i am more uncertain that uh, our uh, achievements that concern drones , they will not be among the best in the world because we directly have combat experience of application and our military say that it is better than worse and they understand. let's put it this way . it is very, very good. it does not necessarily have to be ukroboronprom, i emphasize once again this misconception that a state institution should cover all the needs of our army, this is because private institutions can recruit the best personnel, the best specialists. the fact is that when work

is interest, when work is well, completely, completely different conditions it's probably not about personnel, but i'm more unsure that there are good personnel in ukroboronprom, here it's just about everything, about the whole system, you need to understand what ukroboronprom is , because everyone imagines that it is some kind of production the no complex is a superstructure over factories and enterprises engaged in the production of e-e products of the defense-industrial complex, the latest drones were recently presented to government officials as part of the drone army program , tell e-e the last flight between moscow and the city , these drones are already in operation, which moscow, which city look at what happened there , i can say that our drones will be no worse than the israeli ones, but that one is better in many respects and we understand exactly what we are doing and

our people who deal with this issue are superspecialists for this period of time, i can say that if there had been no war, if there had been no such tests, there would have been no such tasks , what should be done next, and the children, as you say, go to the moscow network and directly to where you need to go by yourself, then it is unlikely that we would have such achievements and now we are able to do very interesting things that will be sent there and where it is necessary in that direction, which is necessary to convey greetings from the russian partisans. they clearly articulate when it's about about their weapons, that we do not have the right to fire their weapons at the territory of the russian federation, as for our own weapons, there are such taboos, and how can we have a taboo if the aggressor country has deployed

a huge company against us, and a military company if they kill our child almost every day what should be the taboo we have an agreement with our partners that we do not really use them with weapons on the territory of the russian federation so that they are not accused there of allegedly being attached to what he resolved by the russian federation, but this does not apply to the weapons produced by our military-industrial complex. i want to say that we have certain achievements in this regard. well, not everything can be told, but at least what the representatives of this well, these are generally things that have a very limited number of countries , and here we have to talk about quality. they can not only move, but they have to be in the right place, the right time, and

do what they have to do what they have to do. by the way, what is the point of talking about our internal enemy, this is the so-called borisov syndrome, unfortunately, it did not affect almost the entire country. and why are we still talking about it? well, not the meetings of the top teams so that the president of ukraine gave an order to directly check everyone without exclusively representatives of the assembly centers, that's what they are called , besides, not only that, but also their deputies got into the circles that today there are 11 areas that are engaged in according to the results already after the report of general pavlyuk according to the results of 11 areas that are especially focused on today, the inspections continue to be difficult, but the job is what concerns borisov well, there are two components here

, firstly, this is a person who has been there for a long time in this the odesa assembly center was located. unfortunately, what concerns certain traits that should have been inherent directly to people who are engaged in everything and have shoots , especially during the war, unfortunately there are also cases when people are not engaged at all permissible things. let's wait, you know that as the class said, the process has started, now we will see how it will happen in other territories. i am more than sure when this gentleman will be proven guilty . according to the court's decision, when the president says this or that, someone has to implement it all, then you return to this question on the banks, the president said that everyone should be at the front, they and whose

vertical is it, who should report on what indeed, such and such a number went according to the results of each bet , and here is what happens, eh, in secret mode, eh , the relevant regulatory and legal documents are issued, eh , control is necessarily carried out after the deadline has passed , a report on the extension is mandatory, and there is no question is not outside the scope of attention, but there is no such thing to talk about, conventionally speaking, they forgot everything is under control , everything is worked out, not all of society, er , is reported, and not all of us, society, can tell. the fact is that, well, so-and-so happened. meeting of the defense security council almost every friday, i, er, addressed our citizens and had a public report on the issues that took place at the meeting

of the defense security council today in wartime. and defense by the fact that it takes place in a secret regime and the agenda, everything that happens there, all this can only be said in general er essays to our er citizens well, because we don't want it , because there are certain questions about connected with a secret there is a certain question that is connected with that state in some way. today we are in a state of war. the deputies in their telegram channels are complaining that after the incident with aristol they will now be able to be released abroad only by calling who previously gave them permission the national security and defense council of defense has nothing to do with whether a deputy can go or another official cannot make this decision directly, the person who heads that body, if we are talking about deputies

, as far as i understand, there are certain rules, if you go on a business trip, you have to receive the relevant decision of the chairman of the verkhovna rada that you are going on this business trip and there are no problems with any deputies in order to go on a business trip, it is another matter if you have a business trip for 2 3 4 days 5 days a week and you return in a month one and a half, and somewhere along the way, you have time to rest, well, it's probably not quite correct , to put it mildly. that's why if the manager will be some other means of finding out whether this business trip is appropriate or not it's up to each manager, we had a solution for our sake, all kinds of defense, which is the only one for all bodies, here it was adopted at a meeting of the security and defense council, and everyone is

responsible for their subordinates on business trips, to travel like this, but to use business trips for a long period of time in order to rest, once again i say at some resorts there well, this is, well, at least it is not ethical. not to mention other things. it is probably not ethical that many politicians have already started preparing for the elections, judging by their activity and how much money we see boards, we see an army of bots and so on in in the near future, elections may take place, the word combination is analytical, it is the maximum soft that we can use in this case, uh, i understand exactly how people talk about it at home and use other slang and other word combinations, but as for the election, i can say that i do not

i understand how elections can be held during a war . keep in mind that people who are directly in the trenches, directly on the front line. but i have a simple question. and what about those who think that elections should be held are going to involve all the people, uh, you are going to hold elections without people in pixel, well, it will have to be a little bit like this, you already know , uh, extremely extremely, you have to be careful about this pixel time , what are the rules of pixel, the laws of pixel, here we are today we have to pay attention to this and understand that they are citizens of our country and they must participate in this. i don't know who can invent for themselves what is possible . it is impossible to decide the fate of ukraine without them. well, let's do it this

way. i don't know what you are talking about now i say once again that if the people who are defaming our country do not take part in the elections, i want to see what kind of elections they will be . keep in mind that we are a country in which civil society is always responsible for the country . time has its say. i would very much not like that we have come to the point where civil society itself will take responsibility for certain things. we are living in an extremely difficult period that we must live through when, after 1991, we inherited this soviet system. management, soviet leaders, the soviet union, this whole matrix that covered us, our country, and continued to hold it until volodymyr zelensky actually came to power, i can

say that it was the president who broke this system of the soviet union, it was volodymyr sanevich , but i just told him that time would pass therefore, volodymyr ruslanovych zelenskyi will be remembered in history textbooks not only as the winner of this war, but what will happen for sure, and as a person who broke the soviet system of governance that existed until now, with whom we would definitely not get anywhere it was simply impossible, this soviet system had to be removed in 1991, unfortunately we did not succeed at that time , we decided that we can continue to barrage between the two or three centers that exist in the world, and now we have the consequences, public opinion is still wanted let's talk, the democratic initiatives fund has made measurements, 30% of ukrainians agree on the imminent end of the war at any price, and alarming

figures, our higher military and political leadership pays attention to sociology when making certain decisions, it is necessary to be very careful relate to sociology, especially which is carried out during the war, during the active phase of the war. keep in mind that uh, the passionaries who are, that is, they decide very often , let’s say so, those moments that will not be taken on by the part of the population that well, someone is for those other reasons, for one reason or another, i decided that so and so could happen, so everything should be . in fairness, our president has 10 points on which we agree in order for peace to come, and

certain points are clearly defined in these points positions that concern of our borders in the internationally recognized borders of the borders, as for the responsibility of the aggressor country, everything is written there. we cannot just take it and say yes, let's finish it because someone is fed up or someone does not want it. this is a responsibility to generations for tens and hundreds of years, mykhailo podolia k says coincides with the elections in the united states, the republican candidate suddenly wins , our actions are taking into account the fact that the united states is in first place in providing armed forces. i don't know what podolyak says, i don't follow. i know what you're talking about, here's what concerns the elections in relation to the united states. i want to remind you that when trump was elected

president of the united states last time, the number of that champagne group in moscow, in the kremlin and in other offices there was just crazy, all of them then i still remember that zhirynovsky was alive, they all drank champagne and shouted trump, ours and so on, but you have to understand that the united states is a democratic country with certain norms and rules with certain balances that exist in this country, and i would so much was careful about all these things. we have our own country, we have to reserve it , we have to win the whole war, and the question is, if someone thinks that it can depend on one or another person, that's not how it all works. you mean