[000:00:00;00] has yet passed through the western countries of the usa. that is, we need to really take the initiative, but somehow look for the result, not only with activity, but also with smart, predictable solutions, by analyzing the situation, because the world is very cynical and, in principle, it will only go for pragmatic solutions that will interest them in what they there is no need for a long war as putin now wants to transfer it to his own elections and even better to the elections in the usa it is obvious that china does not need it even in china it cannot now realize its goal that was set a long time ago to acquire not the first but not the second in the world economically well, they want to rise militarily, but this does not allow them to rise higher, so they will try

not to show russia that they have changed their position there, nevertheless will gradually take certain steps, but you know, i am not very optimistic about all this, their position, i am counting more on what we counted on from the very beginning, this is the sufficiency of the latest weapons of the ukrainian fleet, army, aviation systems that protect people's lives, this is the maximum sanctions pressure, this is the expansion of the circle of solidarity, the pressure on russia is political, that is, everything is equal, only these means will produce results , the diplomatic process can go in parallel, but it is now secondary, er , it is an illusion that meetings of this kind will bring er, a just peace not the result of actions in ukraine with the support of the world, that is, i think that

i need to understand, and especially the ukrainian leadership, that if i fly you, they will applaud you. but in principle, your result will be from the unity of the people, the readiness of the rear, they help of the front and the results of the occupation of the territory, all these countries are running like rabbits, if we succeed, they will immediately want to be a part of putin's success, they will foam there and kick their own already all over the world. as soon as he loses, he will cling to everything possible because i don't understand that this is the end of him, he took a one-way ticket and that's why it will be difficult, it will be very difficult because it is already a question of the survival of that regime of his existence and and in some ways, even the existence of the country as it is now in russia may be because it will be very difficult because it has already become a real

collision, well, at such a regional level of civilizations, two worlds have collided, and our task is still to translate the formula that our enemies are talking about, that they are fighting with nato and the usa, in reality you say that you will know the usa, well, fight to know from the usa what is inconsistency and children fight, why did you go to kill women and children in ukraine, what is easier, what do you think is a weakness, that is, why do we not emphasize that this is a war of a global nature, globalization , civilization, war is not russian ukrainian the war is already a war of civilization, it is taking place on ukrainian territory by ukrainian forces, of course, with the support, yes, huge support , only the usa gave us 43 billion weapons and for 43 , well, they didn’t give everything, but that’s why we need the atakams missile. we need the taurus. we

need planes, either fight or fight because that this war will end, i am sure, but i do not go back on my words, it will end when russia shuts up with nato and this will be a test and when nato will show its strength, that's all and it will end putin wants, he gropes, he wants such a small victorious war with nato and nato should make sure that this attempt at provocation ends in complete failure, and then there will be a capitulation of russia, it will be a different story . and since they now want to leave it on the territory of ukraine, well, it is unfair, it is clear that these are emotions in many ways, i understand that diplomatic work is different from simple ones emotions, but the basic basic otaku, that is, the movements of the political we have not won yet, we have to make it the responsibility of all countries, not that they will tell us how peace should be established, please do for this

something because you also lose and first of all the western partners , we are very grateful to them, but they have to get involved. on youtube and facebook , please like this video, subscribe to our channels, and vote in our poll. during the program, we conduct a poll asking you whether ukraine needs to negotiate peace with russia at the moment, 85% said of our viewers on youtube yes 11 yes 11% - no 85%, er and their version in four percent er-er p valery er we witnessed how over the past few days ukraine er-er struck drones on vessels

of the russian navy of the black sea fleet and uh, on the ferry that was transporting fuel and lubricants for those uh, the military and for the occupiers of russia who are on the crimean peninsula, what did zelensky say, and after that, how did he threaten russia, let's see if there is a blockade, then ukraine must find another a way to end the blockade of our waters if russia continues to dominate the black sea and block by firing missiles then ukraine will do the same i am a fair defense of our capabilities if they continue to fire at us few weapons but if they continue to fire until the end of the war they may be out of ships or can these

two attacks, which took place literally on the same day , should be considered a prologue to the renewal of the grain agreement and negotiations regarding the grain corridor. well, i think that the actions were absolutely correct from the point of view point of view to show that this game can be played together if russia declares that it is blocking there. well, ukraine has more right in its territorial waters for such things and i am very grateful to those who found the means for this . because our problem is not to come up with the right solution our problem is that we do not always have the means for this, and here this swordfish swam, and there is some mountain alonivod, what is he doing there from murmansk, eh , this ship is unknown. well, this is necessary, in principle, the results.

a very good story, because if we have asymmetric means, it definitely shows that russia will not be able to dominate the black sea . by the way, i expected that other countries would show this , when before there were nato ships and then turkey and romania, but we have to show ukraine this result in order to to show that russia cannot make the black sea its internal territory. therefore, this is a good result , a good success, but uh, well, russia will also prepare for this, to withdraw everything, as they did after uh, moscow followed destination uh well, they will take away further they will hide, they are masking something there, they are repainting, but the result will be the same, it’s just that during uh, and the only thing that they have definitely already seen is that without , you say, a deal look what for they have an agreement, therefore, an agreement in order to later record as they want, not only in

crimea, that they do not leave the military base, but that they have the right to control the black sea. nothing protected, do you think they don’t need this agreement and we need a legal agreement that records their seizure of their dominance in the sea of ​​azov and the black sea. they have de facto dominance in the sea of ​​azov in the black sea, as we can see, they don’t have such a thing, but they really want to consolidate it, so when talking about peace agreements, you always have to ask the question: what is the agreement, what is the essence, what is the peace at whose expense , that is, all these words mean nothing, they are meaningless , because we know in the history of many countries how wars ended, the question is not whether is there a formal agreement, is there a result? the question is that the country that fought for its independence got its sovereignty at the end of it. in

principle, there were cases when there were agreements, well, you remember these stories when the americans left two years later , the war started, and i will repeat it. i had to go in again, this shouldn't be, it should be just building up the capabilities of asymmetric destruction capabilities, that's how the russians are hitting our uh civilians and we seem to hit with good weapons, precisely sniper systems, such artillery systems or rockets on their communications. if only we had the opportunity to clearly show them that we should not mess around at all, then we do not need any grain agreement. well, what is a grain agreement? this is what the russians of the zbarazhsky shoulder tell us. and then we will not sink ships so that your apartments they were shot as soon as they were done without them, let's go to izmail, and to odesa

, this is what an agreement, well, this is bullying, this is an attempt to impose its power for today's capacity for concessions and so-called compromises, but this is the law, it will end then when the countries of the black sea will still agree that it is necessary to ensure free shipping and all methods of forceful termination of peaceful shipping will be punished by forceful responses that's all well, for now , it's slowly going slowly, but it will happen, and why, according to you, mr. valery, only ukraine dared to put on putin's place in the black sea, although there is still an incomplete three countries that are part of the north atlantic alliance, which in principle could show putin that piracy

in the black sea is not at all good and threats to shoot civilian ships that enter civilian ports only on the pretext that there may be weapons for ukraine. it is not very good. you are asking such a question, which is very easy for me to answer as a ukrainian, and i don't want to anymore, because at first when there were ships that were one could destroy the black sea fleet with one volley. i was very sure that this shift would not only restrain russia, but would give a powerful response from the very first day of a large-scale war . unfortunately , these ships had withdrawn. the seas are closed now are closed by the way, turkey has basically taken a step, they do not allow any additional russian ships to go there

through the bosford dardanelles, that is , the patriot convention is in principle valid and this is well, i think there is a positive in this situation, but bulgaria and romania have minesweepers turkish fleet well, i don’t know the details, but it’s definitely not weaker than the russian ones, unless you take some of the missile systems there. and yes, the fleet itself is definitely powerful , especially when we, our brave fellows , negated moscow, and that’s all they have there floated larger, so now it would be possible to show the place even without using the clash of forces, moreover, they sometimes do this with airplanes, some fly there along the coast of romania, there is a system that can close, well, the nearest territorial waters, this

is done, they close these territorial waters and you can to conduct ships with it, but this is not a solution to the question . you are asking the question correctly. i am you asking me. and i am surprised. i always thought that for the americans, for the usa and for the nato countries, freedom of navigation in the world this is a key and important element of security, because if they lose it , then there are many risks in the south china sea. why did they give up? the question is not the conflict in ukraine with russia, but the black sea. why did they give up? there is no answer . you just mentioned erdogan. turkey and we have already started this conversation about what the turks could do more than they are doing and erdan, in principle, is probably the only leader of the member countries of the north

atlantic alliance who supports communication with putin and who not only talks with him and is ready to accept him on the territory of turkey although he knows that putin has a warrant from the international criminal court, can erdogan be convincing in the negotiations with putin, some planned for the month of august , and regarding the war in ukraine and the grain agreement , and perhaps erdogan’s deliberate intervention uses at least as one of the communicators who communicates directly with putin, what do you think about putin's role in current history? i believe that objectively, turkey has won a lot in

this situation and, in principle, has a strong command safe diplomatically, the president of turkey, well, he succeeds in this line, this role, despite all well, not the unequivocalness of such a line , if they chose it, he really shows his allies there that he can do it, i don't know if this role of turkey is the best for peace, for victory, i don't know well, it has already developed and turkey has really grown in its influence, the only thing is that there are certain limits, the limits of this well, let's say, the cardigan behaves with putin not just on an equal footing, but sometimes from a position of strength, and a weakened russia makes it possible of turkey to influence these decisions even more, therefore, for turkey

, for which economic results are very important now, because there is a problem of an economic nature, politically , the president of turkey is strong after the elections. this is the beginning of his next term, because he can afford such sometimes even controversial decisions, but from the point from the point of view of the economy, he will look for solutions both with putin and with the european union, and so on. i am sure that with the european union and nato, the nato countries, well , what defects overlap, he will find more solution than the one now weakened by russia, although of course use this weakness in order to pump out what is needed for it. well , this is the position of turkey. in fact, in my opinion, it could be really good for us . i would like it to be more active in our support, but

i cannot say that it is not balanced, well, that is, we cannot say that turkey is somehow acting against us, nor are they acting in support and in terms of armaments when humanitarian aid begins and the position that crimea is ukrainian, that is, all this will play on the benefit of ukraine so every country probably would like more, but just in the case of turkey - this is the expectation of the results today, by the way, in the turkish derenge, it is in the inland sea of ​​the so-called marble in turkey, the elevators were knocked at the moment of loading the ship with grain - this is a large port, that is, accidental the mine could not swim there because this sea has no borders

either with russia or with ukrainian maritime territorial waters. let's see how it was . 13 and 16 elevators were damaged. the grain corridor well, it is true that the turks are saying that it is not an explosion. well, there were some technical issues that led to the explosion today. valery, the head of the permanent delegation of the verkhovna rada to

the nato parliamentary assembly, yehor june said that the key parliamentary factions in germany, well, in the german bundestag reached a consensus on the transfer of taurus long-range missiles to ukraine, which can hit up to 500 km. he says that it has not been officially announced yet, but this is already the decision. its position that the west should provide long-range missiles and long-range weapons to ukraine as soon as possible, not only to germany, but also to the united states of america, if germany provides us with these taurus missiles, this will change the general situation and the general perception of the west that long-range missiles are already on the territory of ukraine, and this may

open the door, including for american weapons, why do we have problems now, and it is no secret that we have russia , the distance to achieve the goals is not comparable, that is, they use strategic bombers without orders and launch them. yes, the missiles are just on our territory, and they are not accurate, and therefore they hit civilian objects and they do it on a massive scale . that is, let's say escalation, as they once said that the provision of missiles will not be like that, it already is, that is, they launch snakes with calibers there, caliber with sea ​​daggers were able to use strategic bombers with a bunch of missile modifications. that is, if we are not somehow balanced here , it is very difficult to fight with them, but what is more important , these missiles make it possible to simply

destroy warehouses, to destroy exactly what fuels the war. i would say that this is a weapon of peace. it's not a weapon, it's a defense weapon. that's right. defensive weapons, ours have shown now how they use french or british missiles, yes, to destroy the actual bases of fuel reserves or logistics there, and it saves lives, it saves lives. i believe that each such missile the later it is delivered to ukraine, the more to the regret of the dead people, therefore it is absolutely fair to get it faster, why now well, first of all, i see that such a request was made even publicly , do you remember the material, even the public article of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine and as far as i understand his deputy zabrodskyi zaluzny zabrotskyi - it was made public a long time ago that we need

to overcome this imbalance at least if i don't have airplanes because there is no such war in the textbooks where one country completely dominates in distance and the other tries leading like the first world war doesn't happen like that, and i'll tell you frankly, of course we have no way out, there will be a victory and the de-occupation of the territory of ukraine, but any new weapon like this gives more balance in this asymmetric war, that's why it's now don't do it, why pull? i don't see if it was possible to explain something earlier . well, i'm not talking anymore. i'm not talking about the number because even a small amount of a rocket like this from the us immediately opens

the question of taurus immediately because the history the minister of defense said that the americans will give and we will think about a political solution, this is not enough. well, i would very much like to support mr. chernigov's optimism . he, by the way, is working in this direction himself to achieve this, so you know, he really wants it, as do we. everyone to speed up but the system there works a little differently, i think that the acceleration of this allocation would be the provision of a missile like this to the usa, that would definitely change the situation right away, and uh, they say that we can’t use them right away, we need to be trained so that it’s ukrainians who are anonymous, well, listen, well this is already a technical issue, so i don’t see any serious reasons, even from the point of view of the interests of the united states, for biden personally to delay it further, and why do you think the united states of america is delaying

takams, well, you know the kitchen very well american, well, to be honest, they were not ready for such a large-scale use of weapons, well, that is , they have certain contracts, including for this missile. supply to another country they found solutions there, they added a little gingerbread there and later supplied ukraine and i am sure that this can be done with these missiles. that is, i will not say that there are no problems from the point of view of the availability of solutions there, but from the point of view, but i'm sure everything is still political, so far the decision is political well, i don't know what to say about this, i understand why some types were delayed earlier, they really talked about the fact that there will be an escalation and the americans really keep in touch with moscow, it's not a secret and

they are in indeed, for them, this whole line is red. it is a weapon of mass destruction. but it seems to me that i just explained that these missiles are now what it is. well, they are just playing for peace , not war, and they still have a political decision to make. well, let's say so... e congress i to the congress i hope, i generally think, if frankly, i think that now is the time to appeal directly to the people of the united states and to the congress ladies , we appreciate the position of the president of the united states, joseph biden , this is a huge help, we know his wisdom and the sure victory of our common, but if he will receive such advice, then i think that all these delays can affect his prospects, that's why the congress and his

party members should now actively talk about these issues in principle, and we should not be afraid to talk about them, even if in the white house there is something unpleasant, what are we trying to do there pressure, i don't mean zelenskyi or the president's office or the ministry of foreign affairs. no , we mean the parliament of ukraine. valeria of our conversation, belarus started such military exercises near the borders of lithuania and poland, maneuvers are conducted near the owl of the entire landfill corridor , there is such a settlement and, in principle , the ministry of defense lukashenka reports that under

during the preparation, the experience of the war is actively used, namely, the wide use of drones somewhere for the interaction of tank and motorized rifle units with units of other branches of the prowagner forces. nothing is said, as you say, very briefly, if what can happen as a result of this, will they go to this short war that you mentioned that it is possible to have a short war with nato and then sit down at the negotiating table, or maybe it will be the aksuava corridor and these 100 km for which the wagnerites will fight or try to repel belarus. i think they want to do it they will make provocations and can go far enough, so my prediction is that this threat is really quite serious . thank you, mr. valery, you now have a language. it was valery chalyi, a diplomat, politician, and extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america in 2015-2019 , friends. we work live on

the espresso tv channel, as well as our emails on our youtube and facebook resources for those who are currently watching us on youtube, please you still have time to vote in our poll we are today we ask you about this, does ukraine need to hold peace talks with russia as of this moment, 11 said so, i.e. 11% of those watching now on youtube say that ukraine needs to enter into peace talks, 83% categorically said no and 6% wrote their opinion your option in our comments for those who want to read the comments . go to us on youtube. see what people are saying, what they think. well, we will also watch and study it after the broadcast , friends. i put a full stop, i wish you all

good health and good evening, read our news on the espresso tv website, join our social networks, your support is too important for us, i'll put a full stop on it goodbye, congratulations, this is bbc ukraine, olga palamaryuk works in the studio and today we are talking about women in the armed forces forces of ukraine, thousands of women in the ukrainian army, they fight as snipers , female gunners and female tankers, but there are still many problems they face, from life imprisoned under men to manifestations of sexism