[000:00:00;00] and because of it, the new territorial realities should be recognized, which arose as a result of the exercise by the residents of the new russian regions of the right to self-determination enshrined in the un charter, the demilitarization and denazification of ukraine was ensured, the rights of russian-speaking citizens and national minorities, well, in a word , i think that as they always repeat, but zakharov and putin always appeals to the un charter and the right to self-determination, but they manipulate again because, in principle, it is not a separate nation that lived there on the territory of luhansk and donetsk regions and they declared that they want to create their own autonomy or to create their own state, and according to the un charter, they have such a right , this is exactly

where this manipulation lies. people living in a separate territory who suddenly wanted to call themselves some kind of bryansk people's republic and declare themselves, and we will say well , in accordance with the un charter, there are several issues that are very deep, in fact, during this time, you and i will not be able to discuss international legal aspects, e-e ratio. there is the right of the nation to self-determination and to protect the interests of the states of integrity. i will only say that we have already gone through this entire history with russia after donetsk luhansk, when in principle the oun country clearly agreed that in addition to the statute, there are also other documents that clearly regulate what a nation's right to self-determination is. to put it briefly, in this case there is absolutely no parallel with this, i will tell you more than that. this is one question from the point of view

of international law, everyone knows very well that russia, well, in principle, it is just attacking the basic articles of the statute, it is a violation. this is simply a terrible violation - it destroys the role of the statute , the role of the security council, and all this is already recognized. russia is unlikely to be able to manipulate here. yes, according to their logic , they have the right to self-determination and not to the fact that they simply destroyed the families of these unfortunate chechens, they were simply cut down by the troops, and this was also done by the soviet union and then russia. well, what do we not know today the whole world does not know this. that is, it is really a manipulation. but all the same, it is necessary to keep it under control from the point of view of legal decisions and statements, but i will remind you of another story. now let's talk about separatism, this is another story.

when there were manifestations of separatism in spain , do you remember that it is a basque country, the court now accepted that this is unacceptable, that is, in fact, the whole system works in such a way now that uh, in principle , any exit of uh, some territories is not tolerated from the states , and by the way, china, eh, well, everyone’s position is different games, she won't win anything for herself. and regarding the cases of ukraine, well, it's basically bullying , because first you drop tons of bombs on the maternity hospital in mariupol, that is

, then you forcefully take away the children or, uh , screw the heads of various people there and take these things away and with children from a country that is a genocide and deportation and then you talk about the fact that you are about self-determination, well, listen, it is already obvious to everyone, but to whom it is not obvious. i think our diplomatic work and public diplomacy should bring it to those countries to whom it is not yet obvious. so here there is no chance in russia, where in russia there are chances. that's what they say , how did they come up with this? there was no such thing as agreeing with what on earth , well, that is, some kind of stingray comes into your house and simply takes half of your

house from you, takes... he points his gun at you and says listen, let's agree on what's on the ground. well, it's obviously just indecisiveness, uh, and the lack of police resources in this case, if it were in real life, there are police, there are special services that act in the event of armed robberies of some kind, and in the world , the system has simply failed because there is no what kind of structures would have brought such criminals to consciousness, that's what the problem is. in brazil, then all this would end very quickly, only the isolation of the embargo is complete, 100% of the embargo would be completed in a year . well, this war would be finished exactly, that is, russia would then simply fall

. to form it, that is, so that russia still has its place determined by the regime that exists . and by the way, i will say my personal opinion that this regime is supported by the majority of the population, which is now in russia, which means that they also support racism , a new type of fascism, so uh, in this case unfortunately, the situation is such that without forceful pressure on this country, nothing will be achieved, forceful pressure must be on all fronts, the military, where ukraine plays the main violin, but at the same time, sanctioned , why is rosatom still not under sanctions , and also embargoed? why is there no such thing ? quiet down, we talk a lot about the peace formula, and

we talk less about the victory formula . the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation says that we will go to bricks and talk about and discuss the results of negotiations with partners, as he says, we will bring common sense to the sponsors of the kyiv regime , the main result of the meeting in jeddah will be to bring common sense to the sponsors of the kyiv regime, and the participation of brics member countries can be useful, er. how do you feel about the idea that russia is trying to create an alternative to the western world with bricks in this structure, and just a few hours

ago there was a message that there was almost 20 countries are still ready to join, i.e. how far can this story continue and how far can russia create one of the poles that will be interested in russian oil in some russian preferences, i.e. how will this structure and organization compete with other structures in the world of course, they will now try to do something similar , that is, with the participation of the same china and india, brazil , the south african republic of other countries , in order to try to now take over this initiative and hold something without ukraine. it becomes more difficult, but nevertheless, everything is the same, despite the fact that putin is no longer traveling or not traveling to this meeting because they said that he will be arrested well, of course, he will not go, because even though

medvedev is pulling out some bigots there, everyone will understand what it is it will end, so he's not a fool. yes, he's a war criminal, but he's definitely not a fool to play him. like milosevic, he later died there, so in principle , they will try it, it is written, but it will be more difficult for them to do it now, although the initiative cannot be omitted here, the initiative must be taken. to develop the involvement of other countries as wide as possible - this is a positive thing, the un general assembly in september will also be able to continue the active line. well, the main thing here is that you understand everything equally in these countries, each of the countries . do not expect them to simply come to the same one that is planned and simply how fair would it be to support ukraine and they will say yes, here is aggression according to the statute, ukrainians suffer, ukrainians are killed, and therefore the aggressor himself must be condemned, they do not want

to do that, they can tell you 50 things according to their interests, they have a lot of their own interests there, and we have to look for points where we can attract their interest, food security , energy security, joint actions freedom, we are black creating navigation freedom of navigation in the south china sea here with other, well, in the western countries of the usa that is, we need e- to really take the initiative, but to somehow look for a result, not only with activity, but also with intelligent forecasted decisions, analysis of the situation, because the world is very cynical and, in principle, it will only go for pragmatic solutions what they will be interested in is that they do not need a long war, as putin now wants to transfer it to his own elections, and even better to the elections in the usa

. it is obvious that china does not need it, but china cannot now realize its goal, which it has long been set to acquire, not the first but not the second in the world economically. and militarily, they want to rise, but this does not allow them to rise higher, so they will try not to show russia that they have changed their position there, nevertheless , they will gradually take certain steps, but i would you know, i was not very optimistic about all of this, their position, i am counting more on what we counted on from the very beginning, which is the sufficiency of the newest weapons of the ukrainian fleet, army, aviation , especially the ukrainian leadership. the unity of the people, the readiness of the rear, they help the front and

the results of the occupation of the territory, all these countries will run like rabbits, if there is our success, they will immediately want to be part of putin's success, they will foam there and kill with their feet on such a regional level of civilization , two worlds collided and our task is still er to translate that what did you think that the global-civilization war is of an elephantine character here, the war is not russian, the ukrainian war is already a war of civilization, it is taking place on ukrainian territory by ukrainian forces, the truth is with support, yes, huge support, only the usa gave us 43 billion weapons and for 43, well, they did not give us yet

that's why we need the atakams missile we need the taurus we need planes either fight or fight because this war will end i'm sure, but i'm not going back on my words, it will end when russia shuts up with nato and this will be a test and when nato shows its strength, that's all about it and ends. putin wants, he gropes, he wants such a small victorious war with nato, and nato must make sure that this is his attempt, the provocation will end in complete failure, and then there will be a capitulation of russia, that will be a different story. and since they want now, what should we leave it to territory of ukraine, well, it's unfair, it's clear that emotions are many things, and i understand that diplomatic work is different from simple emotions, but the basic basic otaku, that's the movement , you haven't won politically yet, we have to make it the responsibility of all countries, not that they will tell us how to establish peace please do something for this because you are also losing , first of all, our western partners, we are very grateful to

them , but they should join us. platforms on youtube and facebook, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, please like this video, subscribe to our channels, and vote in our poll . about peace at the moment 85% of our viewers on youtube said yes 11 yes 11% - no 85%, eh and their version of

four percent strikes by drones on ships on ships of the russian black sea fleet and on a ferry that was transporting fuel and lubricants for the military and for the occupiers of russia located on the crimean peninsula, what did zelensky say after that, how did he threaten russia, let's see if there will be a blockade, then ukraine must find another way to end the blockade of our waters, if russia continues to dominate the black sea and block the missile launchers, then ukraine will do the same as i do with fair defense our capabilities if they continue to fire at us are few weapons, but if they continue to fire until the end of the war , they may be left without ships, or can these

two attacks that happened literally on the same day be considered a prelude to the renewal of the grain agreement and the negotiations on the grain corridor? i think that the actions absolutely were correct from the point of view of showing that this game can be played together if russia declares that it is blocking there. well , ukraine has more right in its territorial waters for such things and i very much thanks to those who found the means for this. because our problem is not to come up with the right solutions, our problem is that we don't always have the means for this, and here this swordfish swam, and there is some mountain alonivod, what is he doing there from murmansk er, this ship is unknown. well, in principle, we need results. by the way, an asymmetric answer - this is a very good story, because if we have

asymmetric means, it definitely shows that the russians will be able to dominate the black sea. by the way, i expected that other countries would show this while earlier there were nato ships and then turkey and romania, because ukraine has to show this result to show that russia cannot make the black sea its internal territory. that is why this is a good result, a good success, but uh, well, russia will also prepare to withdraw all of this what did they do after uh moscow went as intended uh they will take away further they will hide they are now there they are masking something they are repainting but the result will be the same just well it will take time uh and the only thing they are sure of already they saw what you say is an agreement. look what they had an agreement for a year ago in order to later record how they want not only in

crimea, that they do not leave the military base, but that they have the right to control the black sea. and if ukraine has land-based missiles, yes how did the neptunes get over this, what do they guarantee if they have novorossiya, nothing is protected, do you think they don’t need this agreement and we need a legal agreement that fixes their capture x dominance in the sea of ​​azov and the black sea they have de facto dominance in the sea of ​​azov in the black sea, as we can see, they do not have such a thing, but they really want to consolidate it, therefore, when they talk about peace agreements , the question must always be asked: what kind of agreement, what essence, what kind of peace at the expense of whom, that is , all these words mean nothing without substance , because we know in the history of many countries, how wars ended, the question is not whether there is a formal agreement or whether there is a result. the question is that the country that fought for its independence

got its sovereignty at the end, in principle, there were cases when agreements were well, you remember these stories, when the americans left two years later, the war started, and it was renewed, they had to go in again, this shouldn't be, it should be just building up the capabilities of asymmetric destruction capabilities, that's how the russians are hitting our civilians, and it seems to us to hit with good weapons, precisely sniper systems, such as artillery or missile systems, according to their communications. so, if only we had the opportunity to clearly show them that we should not mess around at all, then we do not have any grain agreement and you don't need well, what is a grain deal ? the russians of zbarazhsky shlekh are telling us. and we won't sink the ships so that your apartments will fire as soon as they did without them. come

on, izmail. well, in odessa, what is this deal? well, this is bullying. this is an attempt to impose one's power . today there is no capacity for concessions or so-called compromises, but this law will end when the countries of the black sea still agree that free shipping must be ensured. and all methods of force to stop peaceful shipping will be punished with forceful responses. that's it. well, for now, it's slowly going slowly, but it won't happen right away, but why, according to you, mr. valery, only ukraine dared to put putin in place in the black sea, although there are still three countries that are not understood there that are part of the north atlantic alpha, which in in principle, they could show putin that piracy in the black sea is not very good and threats

to shoot civilian ships entering civilian ports under the pretext that there may be weapons for ukraine are not very good. it is very easy for a ukrainian to answer him and i don’t want to because at first when ships were present that could destroy the black sea fleet with one salvo, i was very sure that this rotation would not only restrain russia but would give a powerful response from the very first day of a large-scale war. unfortunately these ships have taken out. are there any opportunities now for those ships that, er, in this lake of the black sea are closed, now they are closed. by the way, turkey has basically made a move, they do not allow

any additional russian ships there across the bosphorus, the dardanelles, that is, the pantriot convention works in principle, and that's ok, i think it's positive in this situation, but because romania also has minesweepers, the turks have a fleet. well, i don't know the details , but it's definitely not weaker than the russian ones, if you don't take some of the missile systems there. the fleet in itself is definitely powerful, especially when we, our duplicitous fellows, minus moscow, and that’s all they have floating there is bigger, so now it would be possible even without using the clash of forces to show the place, moreover, they sometimes do it

some planes fly there along the coast of romania, there is a system that can close the nearest territorial waters, it is done , they close the territorial waters and you can move ships through them, but this is not a solution to the question, you are asking the question correctly, you are asking, and i am surprised. i always thought that for the americans for the usa and for nato countries freedom of navigation in the world is a key important element of security because if they lose it in the south china sea, then there are many risks. why did they give up so much the question is now the conflict in ukraine with russia and the black sea, why did they give it away, there is no answer, it’s just that you already mentioned erdogan, well, turkey, and we already started this conversation about the fact that the turks could do more than they are doing, and in principle, this is probably

is not the only leader of the member countries of the north atlantic alliance who maintains communication with putin, who not only talks with him but is also ready to receive him on the territory of turkey. although he knows that putin has a warrant from the international criminal court, can erdoğan should be convincing at the talks with putin, which are scheduled for the month of august, and about the war in ukraine and about the grain agreement, and perhaps the west is consciously using erdogan at least as one of the communicators who communicates directly with putin. what do you think about putin's role in current history? i think that objectively turkey won a lot in

this situation and, in principle, has a strong command , security, diplomatically, the president of turkey, well , he succeeds in this line, this role, despite all the ambiguities of such a line, if he elected, he really shows his ally over there that he can do it, i don’t know if this role of turkey is the best for peace, for victory, i don’t know. well, it has already developed and turkey has really grown in its influence. the only thing is that there are certain limits. the limitation of this well, let's say that the cardigan behaves with putin not just on an equal footing, but sometimes from a position of strength, and a weakened russia gives turkey the opportunity to influence these decisions even more , because for turkey, for which

economic results are very important now, because there are the problem is of an economic nature, politically, the president of turkey is strong after the elections. this is the beginning of his next term, so he can afford such sometimes even controversial decisions, but from the point of view of the economy, he will seek solutions with putin and with the european union, so i am sure that with the european union and nato by nato countries, well , what defects intersect, he will find a solution more than the one that is now weakened by russia, although of course, use this weakness in order to pump out what is needed for him. that's the position. by the way, it actually, well, in my opinion, could be really, well, for us . i would like it to be more active

in our support, but i can't say that it 's not balanced, that is, we can't say that turkey is somehow acting against they do not support us, and in terms of armaments, when humanitarian aid begins and the position that crimea is ukrainian, that is , all this will play in favor of ukraine. derenji is in the inland sea, the so-called marble sea in turkey, the elevators were blown at the moment of loading a ship with grain, this is a big port, that is, a random mina could not sail there, because this sea has no borders

with russia or with ukrainian maritime territorial waters let's see how it was. 13 and 16 elevators were damaged. by the way, it was actively used in the grain corridor. well, the turks say that it was not an explosion. well

, there were some technical issues that led to the explosion today. valeriu, the head of the permanent delegation of the verkhovna rada to the nato parliamentary assembly, yehor, announced in june that the key parliamentary factions in germany , well, in the german bundestag, reached a consensus on the transfer of long-range taurus missiles to ukraine, which can hit up to 500 km. he says that it has not been officially announced yet, but this is already the solution is er you always i remember you were a supporter and er you publicly articulate your position that the west should provide long-range missiles and long-range weapons to ukraine as soon as possible, not only germany but including the united states of america if germany gives us these taurus as it