[000:00:00;00] assessed and reviewed his strategic interests regarding the use of russia is definitely in the place of the russian elites thank god i am not in their place but in their place i would think about the fact that china is gradually beginning to capture all key areas of life and all key markets and soon the russians will look that around them are chinese goods, chinese cars, chinese household appliances, real deposits in russian banks, chinese yuan . and it is not at all clear whether russia is a sphere of chinese interests, and not some kind of classic independent ukraine, as we once were

in relation to russia and such thoughts. as far as i understand, they are already beginning in russia, it is not yet some kind of mainstream, but nevertheless it is starting, so china will very consistently and strictly continue the strategy of increasing russian dependence on it, and the next phase will be obtaining shares of the in russian businesses and russian infrastructure projects, including in the arctic, including in itself in regions strategically important for china. on august 9, the president of the united states of america, joe biden, signed a decree limiting american investments in certain technologies and products in countries that cause concern, such a country is currently china and the americans want limited and investments in technologies that america considers critical for its national security, these are

semiconductors, conductors, microelectronics, quantum information technologies, artificial intelligence , what does it mean, washington, where is it to understand that the future could be worse for the paks, this is actually a key issue for me in american -chinese relations. i believe that they can and most likely will settle and equip the issue of trade relations will be much more complicated, of course, with security we are the issues and now it is called a very significant challenge that will be possibly a reference point and possibly a point of no return to sino-american relations - this is the presidential election in taiwan in january next year, it will be held

according to a different model. as a rule, it was elections where representatives of two key parties competed now three candidates are the third relatively new party of the former mega taipei and so far china is playing its game and wants to ensure its direct, more precisely, indirectly, of course, participation and influence in political processes in taiwan so far, but the americans understand very well that the main fundamental issue of the xxi century is technological leadership and the technologies you mentioned, and this is primarily quantum computers computers, artificial intelligence, they will determine who will be the leader of the 21st century, and

the fact that technological exchange will be limited in the united states has been talked about for a long time. china is catching up with the united states, not very quickly, but the americans are also catching up have limited it, it will cause a wave now, even a tsunami, and the people in beijing, even though in beijing, of course, they knew about this step and predicted it , and of course this context will also affect the functioning and work of such formats as jedda, well, let's call it jedda po for now the city where it took place the last time, the last time ago, these are all american steps, they also affect the possible conversations around us

around ukraine, and it is absolutely clear that we americans and without the chinese will make the final solitaire, whatever it is, most likely or it will not succeed, it will be extremely difficult, therefore, american-chinese relations affect er, and they affect us directly , and how do mr. pavel's relations affect us in the context of what i already mentioned about the joint russian-chinese training when er, almost a dozen warships from the two countries sailed to alaska to the but the human islands and this prompted the officials of the united states of america there to deploy four destroyers of the naval forces, that is, china still wants some kind of partnership with the united states

states of america, taking into account the trade between the two countries, or whether he still wants to show more strength in this together with russia . what is this connected with? why are the chinese in this situation going together with the russians to alaska ? the chinese want a world system and security and, of course, financially and technologically, wherever they dominate, they perfectly understand that this is impossible. but nevertheless, the dep e-e their e-e basic interest and their strategy would be directly taken into account. that is, their logic nothing serious in this world without china and

taking into account the direct interests of china where it is for the chinese is important so far. western logic is winning, but as you can see, under pressure, this world is becoming comprehensively western and the west, in my opinion, needs to revise its strategy and this is happening in many areas , you see how the western is now being revised strategy regarding australia where , in my opinion, the french have made many fundamentally incorrect conclusions regarding e.e. chinese involvement regarding russian involvement regarding how they will do it not in the sense of strategy but in the sense of tactics and of course the chinese will continue to work with this russia, as i already said, not because they like inter russia, but because they like it, and at least the prospect will continue to be needed. china needs a weakened russia

. china needs a russia that depends on china . but nevertheless, china needs russia and in the near future, this strategy is unlikely to change , at least i do not see a sign and for its mass media , friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our platforms on our youtube and facebook platforms for those who now watch us on youtube please vote in our survey today we ask you about the following under what conditions are possible peace negotiations between ukraine and russia options for answers under no conditions under the condition of the withdrawal of the troops of the russian federation from ukraine the withdrawal of troops pros plus payment of reparations only under the condition capitulation of the russian federation four options for answers you can write your answer in the comments under this video we will be interested to know your opinion about what you think

about this if your answer option is not coincides with the proposed we continue our conversation with pavel klimkin and today it became known that ukraine will receive new patriot anti-aircraft missile systems from germany there are additional installations, patriot, so we thanked you for the protection of our people, this is necessary from the russian theory for our entire territory , we need much more vpu systems than there are now , corruption step by step, we are transforming it significantly

more on the specific capabilities of our air force, our anti-aircraft fighters, our mobile fire brigades, we are preparing more specifics regarding modern fighters for our soldiers, there is no doubt that we will have f16 this week, mr. pavla, one of the people 's deputies, yehor junev, wrote about the fact that the german bundestag has almost already decided to provide ukraine taurus long-range missiles , but for now he is delaying this, i understand , waiting for the decision of the united states of america to provide such long-range missiles, why according to you, it is still enough is cautious about providing this long-range weapon that flies at 300,500 km, they are afraid that the ukrainians will use it on the territory of the russian federation, or because then the uh- final counteroffensive that has begun will be completely clear. well, let's talk about

the west, as they say and the west . we will receive from the british, we will receive from the french, er, the germans will behave in the matter of the supply of missiles, er , in the same way as they behaved in the matter of the supply of tanks. i remember very well how they worked on at the beginning it was called the tank consortium, then the tank coalition was created, the germans have their own strategic culture , they want to take all the next steps in unison with the americans, and this does not mean that it will be the provision of attacks, there may be

other options. at least in the station, the mood is gradually changing, i won’t say that every member of the bundestag is now enthusiastically supporting it, but nevertheless, it’s a general abduction. you agree, but the mood is in favor of supplying us with this type of weapon they no, they change, this is the only thing we have to understand, in the end, a decision is made, a fairy tale is made, if even everyone in the condense says, and unfortunately, not everyone will say. and now there is that's why we need a solution and this solution as i understand it will be as i tsarfu unison is adopted

according to the americans as for the reasons why is it so complicated this is all an idea why how slow why is it taking so long and not what we have and we want to receive this is, of course, the fear of escalation and the desire to distribute the responsibility of all the key eh of the country yes , of course, we also have a desire to speak honestly about it sensei, although war cannot be predicted , but nevertheless understanding what will happen , biden's adviser on national security has repeatedly said that the american people are not

afraid of putin's regime, but nevertheless must take into account the possibility of escalation on his part and they do not want , like our other allies, to drive putin and the russian regime into a dead end . what is supplied is not all that we need and for a long time. and here i have been discussing with your german and french colleagues in recent days the issue of the commitments of the g7 and the countries that are added to these commitments, how we will continue them discuss and it is very important that we receive from all obligations not what we are ready

to give and when we are ready to give but what we need and when we need otherwise these obligations will be greatly weakened, this is one of the key issues that concerns the security model and ukraine our and in general the situation around ukraine will not all depend, of course, on the situation that will develop on the borders with russia and the border because it is clear that after the russian federation issued an ultimatum regarding the passage of civilian vessels to of ukrainian ports, ukraine has demonstrated that it can use naval drones to reach the russian black sea waters of novorossiysk and strike amphibious ships, as well as ferries carrying fuel and lubricants to the crimean

peninsula for the russian occupiers. in the studio in skabeeva, the propagandists quite lively discussed the attack on the russian ships , let's see a fragment of an attack on our logistics infrastructure, it would be to the devil's mother from the face of the earth, all of odessa, all of odessa ports, all of ukraine, and we stand again, throwing up our hands and we're talking well, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, the new one, the insurance company traveled with us, the employee almost does not want to, but simply because after the attack on the crimean bridge , we destroyed almost the entire infrastructure , including the production plant in odessa, we struck the port when, after exiting the grain deal, they tried to resume it again without our participation, they already destroyed the substations, destroyed, destroyed , under-destroyed, they repaired them over the summer. now, roughly the

same thing is happening with the ports. well, they started destroy , let's finish it off , we'll prove that it's called to the end so that there's nowhere to return . we will destroy the port possibilities of southern ukraine, but in the current situation, is the reaction of nato enough? i am not talking about the organization of the united nations, because in the waters of the black sea there are at least three countries that are members of the north atlantic alliance and in in principle, they probably have enough, well, in turkey, they have enough opportunities to protect these grain corridors and prevent russia from being the master. and simply put, pirates in the black sea are not enough, but

let's lay out everything here . i don't expect any reaction. in general, i consider the un to be a patent structure that is useless for the cause of protecting peace and value and is not capable of when it will be reloaded, it is difficult to say, but it is obvious that in today's form it it's more like a simulacrum. and as for our allies, i would like to see a much more powerful reaction from them. look , apart from the statements for today, we received almost nothing and the desire to continue negotiations , perhaps to agree on some russian conditions , and these are russian

conditions, the sanctions regime, i don’t like the grain of speech at all, because we have to ask something in russia, and i, for example, don’t want us to ask something, and that’s why. and also the drones, they seem to me to have created a completely different reality in black sea ​​because russia used to tell everyone that they control the black sea and nato ships are present. but nevertheless, everything is now and these attacks and extreme attacks and attacks before that showed that russia no longer controls the black sea for russia. a fundamental blow not only to military ambitions, but to geopolitical ambitions, and

that is why russia attacks our e-e port infrastructure like beasts in order to prevent show that we can do something without russia and with our allies to create additional complexities, but the main thing is to show that they control the black sea, and this is precisely what these strikes in the regions showed. no, they are not in control, and this is clear to everyone. you and i were just talking about the west separately and not the west in the non-west . they understand the black sea, it is definitely not russian, it is unfortunately not ours , but nevertheless we have levers and we have serious goats in the black sea, so that the last story she very, very well went into her own and

i see it and not only in the back world it is a beautiful story. will this in any way affect the beginning of erdogan's negotiations with putin, which are scheduled for the end of august, because for erdogan, the existence of a grain agreement is also a certain argument. including putin, because he is almost the only leader of nato member countries who shakes putin 's hand, accepts him and generally conducts any negotiations with him, and what erdogan actually did with the commanders of the azov regiment, giving ukraine despite the negative reaction in moscow, shows about well, erdoğan can take some such steps in which, in principle, he is doing it because he thinks it is necessary, but because

putin is like that, jordan can put pressure on putin, but he will try to reach a compromise for putin , now it is very, very important that -he was able to show his, so to speak, strong side , especially after hearing prigozhin, for putin to show that he is a weakling, this will lead to disagreements both inside russia and outside of russia, and therefore to continue the grain agreement on the same terms. this is definitely not an option for putin, therefore i do not exclude and it is considered it is quite likely that jordan will be able to agree on the dominated or more precisely to say on the reset of the grain agreement, i deliberately do not want to call it an agreement but for

the path it is very difficult to agree to just the status of for him it will mean er that he is a weakling he cannot practice what he wants and i think that he will not go for it in the literal sense of the second moment uh here there is of course uh a certain threat that turkey, which is important to us , but also part of the west will put pressure on us for certain compromises because export grain, it is important for world stability , for world food security, for prices, grain, for inflation, many other functions, and i do not rule out that the west will be ready

to discuss certain commissions, and it is very important for us that these compromises, if they go e will go to the table of the peregobos so that they do not break the sanctions regime, because if putin succeeds in this, it will be a very dangerous precedent for easing sanctions in the future, he will feel that the bombing of our port infrastructure brings him the results inside the country and beyond this cannot be allowed in any way. well, we must remind our tv viewers that putin demands that the agricultural bank be renewed in the swift system and given the opportunity to pump the ammonia pipeline to tolyatti to odesa, which , among other things, passes through the kharkiv region , including the territory of ukraine, so that it is possible

to use and sell, well, that’s it in general . to be honest, what putin is doing, it doesn’t go to his head, because he is attacking the entire infrastructure of ukraine, but he says, please, let me we could deliver our ammonia to odesa, and then from odesa we will deliver it by ship. in my opinion, the americans consume the most russian ammonia products there, as far as i remember. well, to america or there to somewhere in the mediterranean sea. where are they going there and ammonia, and this also raises a lot of questions , which raises a lot of questions , what is happening now on the belarusian-polish and belarusian-lithuanian borders, or whether the belarusians have started conducting military exercises near the slovak corridor, and this is what they

officially speaking and now the poles are talking about the fact that they plan to deploy up to 10,000 troops on the border with belarus, let's hear what polish defense minister mariusz blaszczak said, there will be about 10,000 soldiers, of which uah 4,000 will be directly involved in operations to support the border guard, and 6,000 will be in reserve, these soldiers will improve their skills in the garrisons recreated in the eastern part of our country . what do you think, mr. pavlo? migrants to break through the belarusian-polish borders and create instability on the polish border. is it still possible for russia and belarus to organize a small lightning war in the slovak corridor and thus put on the table for negotiations

on one side putin on the other on the side, the representatives of the north atlantic alaska say there is a small conflict. well, let's sit down and agree on something. i do not rule anything out, and i believe that putin, er, in the kremlin is calculating and calculating all possible options, whether they can organize a war with by those who are now on the territory of belarus, it looks doubtful, but on a large scale they can be a provocation. as you know, nato is strong with its concept of collective defense and the fifth article, which is important for nato and important for us in the future, but you see that i am really emphasizing no one tested the fifth article and i want to be understood correctly when we had september 11, it

was of course an attack on nato countries when the fifth article was involved, but still in the context of military operations and military provocations, no one has tested the fifth article, and it will be very important for nato to respond properly. i am sure that in the kremlin they are trying to do this not as a classic war, because they will understand that they are getting in the teeth, not only in the teeth, but as a provocation and i absolutely do not rule it out, that is why the situation is really serious, i would not discount it there, what the poles are doing in the context of training, but also the lithuanians, this is a completely correct story, i see the president of latvia in the footage you show

. that is, it is a serious story like for poland as well for all the baltic countries and i think that creating more danger and more challenges is in line with putin's logic. we will also hear from sergei shoigu, who commented on the increase of nato troops on the border with russia and belarus. modern armed forces in eastern european countries in the immediate vicinity of the union of border states are located about 300 000 military personnel 8 000 denys armored vehicles 6,000 artillery systems and mortars 650 airplanes and helicopters due to the formation of regional states in it all of the atlantic bloc since february last year

evil in 2.5 different habitually 30,000 people indicated threats military security of russia requires a modern and adequate response , but they always talk about an adequate and timely response they always , well, continue this thesis that we will now get nuclear weapons and deter nato because nuclear weapons it is a weapon of deterrence, not an attack, and an attack will attack us. here is this thesis about nuclear weapons as a possible tool in the current war, which was started on february 24 , 22nd, the great war that putin started voiced this thesis at, if i'm not mistaken, at a press conference with emmanuel macron, it was on february 7, 22nd, they constantly pump up this topic, although the same ministers, forgive me, the same president of poland duda gave an interview in the newspaper washington post and