[000:00:00;00] well, in ukraine, but the problem is that china is now. in my opinion, he will not directly put pressure on the kremlin to achieve , for example, a stop to the war and the withdrawal of russian troops from, well, ukraine actually. well, unfortunately, because now china is takes, as it were, such a position where he wants a sports war, he does not like war, but at the same time he sees russia, let's say, as such a tool against the weakening of american global positions at a time when china is in a situation of confrontation that is, geopolitical consultations with the usa, so we have to understand that these heights of european politicians are a very positive moment for, let's say, conveying messages to china, but the question is that china has

its vision in general, if its roles, for example , regarding the war in ukraine, regarding its relations with russia regarding his own relations with ukraine about defense in belarus with visits to military facilities with which message with which messenger and in general why go to belarus in principle e same there putin decides everything can be immediately speaking with the head of the kremlin, this is a good question, uh, from the fact that this is how we should understand , is there any such subjectivity, for example, in belarus, uh, well, from the chinese point of view , there is certainly subjectivity, because when we remember in 2010 year, when there were events directed against lukashenko's regime in minsk, then china also took such a let's say pro-kremlin position, or let's say about

lukashenko's position, because china considers lukashenko, his regime in general, to be a component of its kind in relations with of the russian federation. that is, it is one of the assets of the chinese relative to russia, and this is from the moment of, let's say, the military-political interaction between china, the russian federation , and belarus. between the heads of state and so on, that is, when china tries to play with two hands, on the one hand, it is very interested in cooperation in the economy, in investments of the west, what is it about the american of western europe, on the other hand

side is also trying to push its own e to the world position . this may be the answer to your question that china has its own interests in russia. yes, and it plays its own game. but why is china not interested in the collapse of the russian federation in order to extract as many other sources of money as possible? well, look, in fact, china is possible can get the same resources, for example, oil, gas or minerals , for example, cobalt-nickel, it can also get from africa, exercise 24, more

and more. the african continent, so it can be assumed that the same minerals and the same resources are received by china, which could also receive from the territory of the russian federation china's decision to join the negotiations in saudi arabia, what does this indicate, mr. petra, you can hardly hear us petro shevchenko, analyst graduate student of the university of tsilina was with us on this night broadcast. i understand that we are trying to re-recruit. tell me no , we thanked the expert and then we move on to

other topics that we prepared for your attention last night, russian terrorists , we all hit ukrainian ports, he said in his evening speech by the president , volodymyr zelenskyi emphasized that never before had global world food security been subject to such attacks as russian terrorists are now doing, that every russian attack on them is an attack on world food prices. a blow to social and political stability in africa and asia, the basic things that give every society a normal life are food, food on the tables of families, no other terrorist in the world , apart from russia, has ever attacked the security of several nations so openly and deliberately at once, it is necessary to react to this to all , food security and russian terror in peaceful cities of ukraine were discussed with oleksandr

pavlyuchenko, the executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union for human rights. well, we continue our broadcast , we will talk with oleksandr pavlyuchenko next the executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union for human rights mr. oleksandr, we welcome you to this threshold, congratulations, congratulations a-a well, i would like to start with the world's reaction to what russia is doing in ukraine in the context of some practical actions, and the first question will be how do you assess sanctions in general pressure because well, someone says that such sanctions are doing their job, someone from the experts says that it can stretch for years when the russian economy feels it somehow, for sure, but there is a report that ukraine , for example, has expanded the list of companies that do business in russia considers them sponsors of the war and actually initiates tougher let's say sanctions from the west, we know that the yarmak mcfole group is actively working , thinking about those companies around the world that cooperate with russia, supplying

components for drones for missiles, we know what this is german companies like bmw have cut off the supply of software for their automotive industry and services. there is aircraft cannibalism when there is already a shortage of components. well , there are many experts here. list the sanctions in action, as you think. yes, of course, let’s go. let's look at the historical experience and perspective. the soviet union actually collapsed due to the pressure and the imposition of the same sanctions . i will remind you that it is also the source of the sale of energy carriers and, accordingly, after the loss of markets and the closure of the and the drop in the price of oil was one of the factors along with

other sanctions policy gave this result . the termination of those e decisions that were previously adopted in advance continues packages of e-e sanctions restrictions and adds e-e positions to these packages, therefore ukraine should also demonstrate on its part e-e policy e-e spread of sanctions in relation to all productions or economic ties which somehow allow russia to receive income that it uses to wage war. well, we know that even the question of the inclusion of russia in the list of

state sponsors of terrorism was raised and there is a question, but this is the state department of the united states of america, which means such a decision to impose even tougher sanctions on all ties with this state, all financial and economic relations, and accordingly, this is the maximum level of restrictions. i will remind you that today four states are included in these states with such a status, and russia is of course, because of its now full-scale wide connections - it is practically impossible, and we will say so uh, it is inconvenient for uh , cutting off all these connections uh, on the part of the united states of america and its partners. therefore , this decision is not taken but the question this is an important decision, i would like to talk to you because we know that the united states of america has already handed over its evidence regarding russian war crimes to the international criminal court. this was reported by the prosecutor general of ukraine andriy kostyan

, tell me why this is important and how it can affect the -e processes are in the international criminal court and what might be the results, what might be the evidence from the united states of america, it might be some kind of satellite images or something specific first of all, we will not learn about the array of evidence and the volume of evidence that could be or will be transferred by the united states of america to the international criminal court, but it is said well, as noted at the end of july -th minute- of this year 2023 about the decision of biden, who in fact yielded to the pressure of the parliamentarians of the american senators eh and eh, the pentagon transferred or gave consent to the transfer of that information eh together

with all the intelligence structures of the united states of america regarding several eh declared types of war crimes, in particular regarding the decision of the leadership of the russian federation to deliberately attack civilian infrastructure, actually resorting to terrorist activities, and the second aspect that was noted separately , which was emphasized , is the decision regarding the deportation of ukrainian children. those that are never public are the interception of er conversations correspondence correspondence - this is er what you mentioned satellite images may be this information

obtained from various sources because er there are those who transmits specific information in the form of records of documents, respectively, this is what is called information received through intelligence channels, it is not published and not made public because the sources of origin of this information are not disclosed, it is clear that if there is a desire to use and receive in the future this source and receive information like this, which is weighty and important. at the same time, it constitutes er-e fa- confirmation of the commission of war crimes er -er such information is really er-er relevant and weighty and here is the very fact that the united states america has volunteered to hand over information that can serve as documentary legal confirmation of russia 's commission of war crimes. this indicates that the position of the united states of america regarding the same

international criminal court has changed radically for the first time. i will also remind you that during his tenure, trump also imposed restrictions on the entry of the same judges into the united states of america, and actually the role of the position of the united states was neutralized, the role of this court, and the united states of america did not support it at all. let's say yes, the concept of the development of this er international tool for prosecution for the commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity er crimes of genocide and the crime of aggression, instead, the administration of president biden declares that they categorically support the creation of a separate tribunal er for prosecution for the crime of aggression, that is, in fact, it is about the strengthening of this international tool for bringing the top russian

leadership to justice, because it is not about ordinary people , it is not about those who are directly on the battlefield shoots, presses some trigger mechanisms, and about the leadership that gives orders, that creates the entire picture of the war, and is directly responsible for planning the action, the beginning and implementation of war crimes, crimes of aggression , which are already proven in ukraine to date. yes, but you see crimes not only against ukrainians, they are russianizing, but they also commit similar criminal acts to representatives of the international community from other countries . britain, costa rica, italy , japan issued a joint statement condemning the criminal prosecution in russia of prosecutor karimakhan

of the international criminal court, 40 seconds. there are judges from italy, japan, of course, i mean russia's reaction to this, it's not just people from the street who came from somewhere and there will be something, actually, this is an assessment of the states that actually say that they have immunity and protection for their employees and will not allow, let's say, to commit any actions that are considered arbitrary. and actually this is a warning, this is a legal warning for russia that it will face such international opposition, to put it mildly, or prosecution in a different manner well, let's hope that, after all, the international community on different sides will not give an assessment to such actions and deeds of the russians and in the context of courts and investigative international institutions and

there will be certain conclusions. thank you, oleksandr pavlichenko , executive director of the ukrainian helsinki union of human affairs, the broadcast continues in the zone of the brigade named after prince roman the great . they are fighting a difficult battle with the enemy . it is about the defense of the homeland, the liberation of ukraine from the russian invaders, our boys are very fighting heroes, you can say they are defending their native land, there is a thirst for the liberation of a unique land and this unclean one, we are standing in defense of our homeland. everything will be fine until we win together about the needs of our defenders on the battlefield, so my colleagues

talked with oleksandr kochetko , and with the missile specialist, the air broadcast continues. with the russian federation different countries, but first of all this is, of course, the united states of america , because in terms of quantity and variety and nomenclature, we will probably talk about this topic the most with oleksandr kochatkov analyst and specialist in missile weapons, mr. oleksandr, we welcome you at this time. i congratulate you. i will quote at the beginning the words of the us secretary of state anthony blinken, who stated that russia started this war and can end it at any moment if you only withdraw your troops from ukraine and stop brutal attacks on ukrainians and ukraine and at the same time announces another package of military aid, probably 200 million dollars , and we receive these packages every month , which happens more often, however, we often hear

criticism from our military help is good, but it's not exactly what we're asking for: ammunition for anti-aircraft fire, artillery shells, anti-tank means , additional equipment for demining, etc. by the way , there were messages not recently from sweden , from the swedes, again, another package from germany, well, armaments and help are coming , but the wording is as follows they give you what we ask for. and when they give us what we ask for and what we need already today, well, first of all, we can ask for a request there.

i am forced to state that nato countries, in general, the civilized world did not prepare and was not ready for a war of such intensity that unfolded after the russian attack on ukraine. and so on and so on, there are no such reserves, there are simply no such reserves, and even ukraine is a name even in the powerful countries of the united states, and it takes time to deploy a certain of production, yes, they financed, yes, they began to expand this production. and this. but we need to find a channel, we need to deconserve at least certain machines , production lines, this is a semi-automatic production of projectiles, and everything else , that is, it turned out that this is needed during the time, so now the income is mostly going to those who can be done to support our combat capability . that is, they are now trying to provide us with the maximum for as long as it allows us to continue our offensive

. they are preventing us from supplying modern weapons, there are such cruise missiles there that he was piloting the taurus, we asked from the very beginning to be given similar missiles, a missile, and we have similar ones, the fact that we have an air base, but we need political missiles very much from the very beginning as soon as with my highness, we are working to equip them with attacks, but this is where the political difficulties arise, and this is true . i agree that it is not going so fast . i wanted to... i'm sorry, mrs. markarova talked about the fact that the ambassador of ukraine to the united states, oksana markarova, said that now ukrainian diplomacy is actively working to ensure that the united states extends the land forest for the entire year 2024.

how do you think it is actually possible that they continue it, and if not, how long it will be, i don’t know. it’s bad, and it’s considered a traitor, so to speak, in the public space, well, it’s completely understandable. if there are any problems with olim liz, the problem , the solution, everything else is russian propaganda will tell that everything and ukraine has been abandoned and still, in fact, it is necessary once again, damn, the forest is not weapons, it is not combat supplies, it is not help to ukraine, nor a linguist - this is a special procedure , it is emphasized, which simplifies the actions of the white house regarding the supply of certain products, the purchase of certain weapons, and so on and simplifying the reporting procedure, emphasize the reporting in front of the specific and the price there for this weapon that we were asked, that is, he chris does not speed up anything, he

does not increase the forest, if there is certain money there , $44 billion, which is there to help ukraine to the production with the logic that it will be directed. then they will be directed and within the framework of the lens, they will be used faster , that is, less agreed, less bureaucracy , they will be used faster, but still the same factories will produce these weapons, and then there is a forest or lisa there is no number of these the production of weapons will not increase, you understand the point, that is, they are good separately and production is separate, therefore lindsay is not for ukraine , well, help, see the simplification of the work of the white house for president baidu biden and his administration, this is actually what we are talking about by and large, we don't care what it will be called, so that weapons and aid are delivered on time in the volumes and positions that we invite, you mentioned the taurus here and

drew parallels with analogs and scalps with the same other innovations produced in other countries, and here i have a question express your position. some people call the taurus long-range missiles . i heard the thesis that these are medium-range missiles , because the long-range missiles are already there for 500,000 to a thousand kilometers. they will finish there for 300-400 or so kilometers, they are better than their analogues produced in other countries, and they will most likely be delivered to ukraine in the near future, and the storm is still telling , there is another option - this is a scout; some are in english and others are in french. well , the attachment points and markings on the hulls are distinguished exclusively by language, but from that , taurus is a missile developed by competitors

, storm is competitive, that is, it has the same the task for his task is the same system of use of combat use but technological technical she decided that otherwise she has a completely different engine with different characteristics, respectively, and constructive ideas are still different but in terms of use there is no difference and when they say about the average range of long range well here conditionally conditionally it is possible to say that in fact this missile and the storm are still in skype and plus they have a range of 50+, i.e. 500 km plus there 560 e-e 600 km, i.e. they can city further between 500 km that is, it exceeds the parameter of an average missile

range, but it depends on the height of the plane from which it is actually launched, if it rose a little higher than it at 10,000 m, then of course the rocket will fly a little further, but what we need to understand is not important for us, it is not fundamentally there 550 km 540 kilometers because it is a tradition not by tradition, according to the principles that exist for themselves, the countries produce these same missiles with maximum characteristics, in particular, the range, and for someone else , even for allies, they limit their flight in the future, that is, they limit if they can fly 500 km usually they are limited to 300 km. this is from the shadow storm. apparently, this will happen with the towers. the restrictions can be a program and you can easily return a large one . i can be constructive, that is, a reduction in the amount of fuel, then a small fuel reserve for only 300 km and nothing here

but everything is going smoothly again , in principle, they will reach 300 km plus to any point of the occupying forces, and on the territory, as you know, of the generally recognized territory of russia, we have something to get our own of production and it is good that we will deliver meat, it is good , but if the weapons that are added to us are russia, oleksandr. in this threshold commented on the situation with the military component help from our partners thank you marathon single news continues in the museum of history of kyiv opened a large-scale exhibition to the 32nd anniversary of the independence of ukraine where visitors

are offered to walk along the historical path and our correspondent artem derkachev has already had time to explore the establishment of state independence through art immersed in history and to look at modern art 32 art objects of famous ukrainian contemporary artists in one space such an exhibition was prepared for independence day in the museum of kyiv with this exhibition we are announcing the final birth and the establishment of the ukrainian political nation, and everyone will find their own meanings here, that is, my meanings, my story , or on the contrary, everyone will come and look and understand that he has left something out somewhere and not always followed life in the state, cultural, political, or maybe, i don’t even know, economic, and maybe it wasn’t his story somewhere. and it is necessary to make up for it. some of the works that can be seen here were selected from private collections and museum collections, some of which have never been exhibited. the national bank made such an exclusive for us we have the first presented coins that were made in

support of ukraine by other countries latvia lithuania and estonia 32 coins stamps and art objects also here is an insta made by us curators and our designer kateryna installation goal to remind about the historical events that happened in ukraine and to show the way of development and establishment of state independence through art and through the prism of art, how ukraine went through the formation of the eurovision maidan revolution, there were different events, good and bad, and we want to show that. this is a story about the struggle for our independence about what we have to show future generations for what we are currently fighting for and what we want to protect and defend. the exhibition will be open to the public until november 5. entry for military personnel is free instead of

samurai girls black spot kyiv residents do not allow an artist to paint a mural related to bachmut on their house , they say that this is a commercial move, because the prototype of a warrior is a ukrainian singer who built a career in russia some of the residents do not want to see a samurai girl on their house but it's a black spot because the residents of the house are against this picture, despite the fact that it represents bakhmut, mutilated by the russians, and the silhouette of the silhouette is the image of a destroyed city , but it carries a new life, although the artist's permission then gave a partial speech complaining about it the commercial course is only cash and the artist cannot understand, they believe that it is a business, there is no context for business because there

is a city and a girl, a warrior, a singer who sings ukrainian songs, helps the armed forces of ukraine with his work yevgenia aksenenko painted several weekends in a row, enlisting the support of the police now and then is going to leave and find another house for the samurai girl, we will pass the word on this to our information service , olga butko is ready to share updated information as of four in the morning, so olya , we are listening to you carefully, thank you m cordons drones of ukraine, join the gathering of the border guard, congratulations, this is a marathon, the only news team works for you, the rada tv channel , we keep our finger on the pulse and summarize for

you the main, only news in the center of events, the day