[000:00:00;00] and the business of providing missiles, providing planes, providing combat support helicopters, providing drones at the operational-tactical operational-strategic level, this is not done, or rather, how it is done, we see how yes, very gradually, and the tightening of the nuts from the west is happening well, they think that this is such a filigree surgical operation a why are we indignant because every day we learn about the death of our brothers, about the death of soldiers, officers, and not only about strikes, such as the strikes on chernigov , let's say the same if we received missiles by the way, not only those i mentioned are cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, some missiles and ground missiles , and also, for example, nsm missiles, naylol strike

missiles, anti-ship missiles . a bay in the novorossian so that they sit there and do not stick out. and if it just sticks out, get a missile of norwegian-american production, which will surely kill this ship . this is roughly the story. grateful for the support of the event, ukraine would simply fall and there would be no more of our state, but the event, which has already made huge investments, is trying to educate ukraine constantly trying to educate

constantly in order to probe whether ukraine will be at some stage from some to give up one's interests or to find some compromises, that's definitely it. it's definitely one of those catalysts, and i think that this is what forced president zelensky in the 23rd year to take a serious look at the defense complex itself, it was a positive moment unfortunately, four years of his tenure in this field were lost, yes, but now there are opportunities to straighten out the situation at least a little and we see that the security service did not lose the 22nd year as by the way, i thought that the state in the 22nd year was completely

lost, but there are such small e oases, so to speak, in quotation marks, if you can put it that way, the sbu has developed, well, in fact , a new branch, yes, the branch of sea thrones, er , now it’s a matter of improving er, aviation drones, and i know that the accelerator of the ministry of defense has been created 2 started months ago in particular, for the creation of powerful ground robotic complexes with elements of which programming and artificial intelligence, that is why the situation is changing, and this is probably very good . thank you, mr. valentin, for the conversation. and on facebook for those who are currently watching us on youtube i remind you that today we are conducting a survey, we are asking you about why the west is planning to change putin's regime options for answers is afraid of a nuclear war is frightening the unpredictability of russia still hopes to negotiate with putin, your option if you have one. please write in the comments of this

video, we are in touch with political technologist oleksiy holobusky , mr. oleksia . our viewers about why the west does not plan to change putin's regime, or in a live show , the federal chancellor of germany stated that the west does not plan to change putin's regime. he says that although putin is convinced that he has in mind the following plans in the west: we do not decide who sits where. we also do not plan to change the regime, however , according to the shul, the president of russia is afraid that this is exactly our uh plan , putin will have to live with the fact that the european union is next to him as a community of democracies open to society, in a certain way, we hope that freedom is not a virus. well, this statement, mr. oleksiyu, does this indicate that

the west wants the victory of ukraine but does not want the defeat of putin? is it possible? what is the victory of ukraine, what is the defeat of putin or russia, each of the western leaders can have completely different answers , so much has already been written about the fact that the victory of ukraine is already in the confrontation with the largest country in the world from the second army of the world, everything else. that's how we kept our independence from sovereignty, this is already a victory or, for example, the question of whether the exit of ukraine to the borders of 1991 will be a victory in such a global sense, this is also, so to speak, such a question

, you understand that the last such global victory, which in principle started from the restructuring of the world and some other rules of international security appeared, this is the second world war, there is a victory, this is the destruction, literally, the destruction of the country, what is the address, this is the nuremberg tribunal, this is the long-term occupation of germany by various countries, and this is the victory of such a victory. i am afraid that, well, it is too fantastic to imagine and western leaders it's just , well, i've been saying this for a long time now that, unfortunately for us, politics in this war for the west remains russia-centric, not ukrainian-centric. they

think about what will happen to russia and more than what will happen to ukraine as a whole, and again, i understand that it is unpleasant to hear and it is unpleasant to even think about it, but it is true, it is a nuclear state, it is a huge state, it is a state that very often played, especially in the last 100 years, a serious role in geopolitical schedules precisely on the entire continent here and it is impossible to get rid of it, so to speak. and i heard your previous speaker behave like this. i studied very well the policy of the united states during the second world war in relation to the soviet union , lend-lease and so on and so forth frankly simple hunted the eyes of roosevelt and did not allow any commission to come

, and if the commission came to check what was there with help, they were simply there, well, they were just undercover, they just drove the skid and so on. and in principle, everything about these stalins was practically immediately, well, roughly speaking only what the americans couldn't produce at that time, that's what they could n't produce, but you didn't give everything else, and of course the behavior that we have now is because of the fact that, well, for america, audi in ukraine and russia is not a priority task in principle but again, we have to start from those realities, just don't be fascinated, don't build a strategy of our behavior based on some rosy hopes, again, there's nowhere . we hear about what western politicians are saying, what they're saying lately. look, we have such a constant example

that we drag back and forth and in independence of the context of israel in europe , there are many politicians, many simple politicians who were not marginalized and well, serious politicians of the left wing, which, absolutely, well, how let's say that they support the struggle of the palestinian people for self-determination against the israeli military, this is normal pressure and well t- t- so it is necessary to understand that not from ukraine all politicians, not all western society will treat the victim of aggression as you would like, as well as everything give another, again, in many questions, we must understand that the stereotypes of ukraine that were created since 1991, which we ourselves blamed for that, yes, he really does affect people, well, what do they know about us except

maidaniv shevchenko klitschko, i know that this is the country with the most corruption of prostitutes and there are a couple more facts. very often in the west i have been to this type of him very often, and this has been for ten years. what is ukraine, so once again we must work diplomatically, we must not be offended . stated that it is possible that peace negotiations regarding the ukrainian conflict will be held in september, as he said the conflict at the end of september, in his

opinion, the negotiations will be conditioned by the economic considerations of the leadership of the united states of america, which will need to find a compromise with the enemy, this is the topic of peace negotiations, or some territories which should be transferred to russia, because they are already in the constitution of russia, the recognition of the new territorial reality, this topic is actively pumped to russia and brazil, and there, er, african countries that are traveling with some kind of peaceful plan, but the point of all this is that ukraine has to give in and remove the fact that part of the territory is under the occupation of the russian federation, is it even possible to predict that with such an idea, at the end of september, some people will appear and begin to articulate this position and

to incline zelenskyi to this in order to somehow regulate these territorial realities and in what way to formalize it, or is it basically an impasse that simply drives the whole situation and there is simply no way out of this impasse. because putin is not going to leave these territories, and we are not going to negotiate with him because he is not leaving our territories, well, of course , this is a very difficult situation. we are in the process of liberating our territories, so to speak, and any conversations on this topic . very painful and very unpleasant but if we do not talk about it, others will talk about it and will offer everything about it, so to speak, there are many levers of influence on ukraine and the protection of collective action if it comes to such

an exhibition that it is better to exchange territory on the question security, again, i didn't put in what i support or what just as one of the positions , that is, they can in a certain way well, if not look through, but in a certain way, so to speak , to act. i think that in this regard it works and i do not remember the same thing build it seems that about 3 million people, about the transition to a military economy and about many other things, this is all, so to speak, such uh, such thoughts that are thrown , including at the ukrainian leadership and ukrainian society, so that we, from a co- western point of view, measure our opportunities with your intentions so if to

at the end of the year, it is easy to read. somewhere from the middle of the summer, the statements of western politicians can be read in many publications. if by the end of this year, the issue of ukraine's access to the sea of ​​azov is not resolved , well, with the cutting of the entire land corridor of russia, yes, on our territory, then the situation , well, according to their opinion, everyone prospects for a very serious delay, because russia will certainly not sit idly by waiting for our next counteroffensive, for example, next year they will strengthen the defense even more they will catch up more, they will make us partially or not partially mobilize, is the money man or so far enough sanctions are in effect, but they are not in effect to the extent that we would like, and this again gives the opportunity for this regime to exist for a long enough time, well, there is such a point of view that putin

is waiting he has the following reference points. he is waiting for the united states elections in the states - it is somewhere in november. that is, november 10 of next year and there is a possible change of administration and already ready forces , so to speak. turn over this page should we somehow try to come to an agreement with the united states, that is, until this moment, the cinema has every opportunity to keep , so to speak, the situation in the way it is now during, again, you do not reject what if they start now well, they have dogs in september there will start some kind of peaceful negotiations, inspired by china , the corals there are tippsovdno and supported by certain countries of the west, then he is also satisfied with the situation, because it is a matter of ideas about whether

we remain in the territories on which they stand and there begins a long process of soap negotiations that, in principle, gives putin the opportunity to quiet down and solve his internal problems, that is, the presidential elections and the disciplining of his elite there. well, in principle, to correct certain serious enough problems that have arisen recently in the economy and with new forces, is it possible, possible i am not saying that this will be 100% the case, but it is possible to start a new attack on ukraine after some time. by the way, at the press conference in denmark where he was this weekend, zelensky was asked what he thinks territorial concessions in exchange for membership in the alliance, but the answer to this question was given not only by zelensky, but also

by prime minister frederiksen, let's hear what the leaders of the states said. i can very clearly answer the question about the future of ukraine, it belongs to the ukrainians, and we have been saying this since the beginning at the beginning it is up to ukraine to decide when exactly and how this will also apply to denmark. we will support you as long as it takes , but the question is when you will be ready to sit down for negotiations, this is my decision to make only ukraine, the exchange of directors is ready to exchange belgrade for our members in moscow even there for a pittance maria zakharova made comments about the fact that president zelenskyi was not quite adequate, answering yes, although zelenskyi answered me too correctly and adequately, considering the

situation that is developing itself in belgorod - the reservations of the russian side against this background, everyone is waiting for the meeting between erdağan and putin, because there are a lot of issues related to, in particular, the russian-ukrainian war and the grain corridor and this whole meeting drags drags from the first they talked about putin flying turkey to erdoğan, now erdoğan says that he hopes to meet with putin face to face in september and ordagan is quoted by the turkish media in september against the meeting of the g20 in india and the un general assembly in spo in the states if we find an opportunity for you in this busy environment we will meet and talk with mr. putin face to face here there are

not so many places where erdoğan and putin can talk face to face apart from the territory of russia and turkey because, well, in the big 20s, maybe putin will fly there, although i doubt it, for example. what do you think about this isolation of putin, which he got into in connection with the warrant of the international criminal court, it turns putin into someone no, he understands that he is certain a political party, and i will just say that if it were some leader, like the former president of sudan, then the fate of this president has been a given for a long time , but because of this, the largest country in the world with nuclear weapons is the only thing that saves putin from being well, let's say he was convicted by an international court for such crimes that he committed in ukraine and not only in ukraine. as for

turkey, well , here it is. here, a very interesting game is taking place. went, and moscow never confirmed it, it was always like that there, so to speak. well, a meeting is possible, but the place is being discussed, it is clear that now the game is going on so that well, it seems like a game of who needs whom more from an economic point of view, from the point of view of avoiding sanctions on gray imports and of course, many other things are needed more, well, that is, russia needs turkey very much from the point of view of earning money on all these schemes , including on grain with the agreement with turkey , turkey would be so connected to this. but i think that here it is a matter of geopolitical issues of the schedules. maybe in moscow they decided that

turkey is too roughly speaking those who want to play slowly. turkey in an effort to be a mediator between the west and russia , such players very inflated er increased er geopolitical interests, turkey is a wake-up call for turkey, maybe israel is now, yes, of course, if he is playing football like that, now this meeting certainly does not look very good for ergog himself, because he always seemed to be such an initiator of all these events from the agreements of the meeting that he looked like that he imposed himself yes and now it turns out that this tactic of his, which

worked for a year and a half, is now not working, again, everything can be changed, there was something strange, maybe the secret meeting may have been in hungary with the representative of qatar, hungary, and this head of tatarstan was from russia. maybe there is something there. and maybe it was there that it became clear that russia is going to a new agreement and turkey, so to speak, is now restructuring its strategy towards russia, in principle, ideally, ideally yes this situation is good for us, because turkey will have nothing left to do but move to a more openly anti-ukrainian position and, well, let's say , support the general course

of western countries in relation to, well, in relation to the isolation of russia, well it seems that washington is also waiting for this, because literally today they published information in the wall street journal that companies from turkey have purchased dozens of tanks, the heads of which are transporting russian oil, that is, erdağan, bypassing european and world sanctions, began to transport oil and the officials of the united states of america, who are referred to in the wall -jordan street says that washington remains concerned that turkey is the center of violations of russian sanctions, including the shadow fleet for oil of the russian federation, attacks on turkish ports by russian cargo ships are under sanctions and are transporting weapons, a section of goods, in particular, electronics, which moscow needs for the production of weapons, that is, you can explain the phenomenon of erdoğan, whose country is a member of the north atlantic treaty organization, on the one hand, and on the other hand, erdoğan is probably one of the few

leaders. of the civilized world, since turkey is a member of nato, i will still believe that erdağan is on our side in this situation, but this is the person who is in contact with putin, who is meeting with putin, who is about something is agreed with him, that is, no one of the european leaders behaves like that anymore. and even more so among the leaders of the nato countries . well, why? well, it is definitely much less worthy of attention from the point of view of the economic, military and any other potential there than the same turkey, well, it is, so to speak, each country has its own interests, someone

is ready from western countries, well, not someone, but the majority is still ready in unison for the sake of certain common tasks, common goals, common values, first of all, to make concessions, even with their own, to step on the throat of their own economy to a certain extent . well, he is a typical authoritarian leader . of course, turkey is not russia, but turkey is not germany and not sweden. turkey is an electoral democracy with authoritarian , let's say, authoritarian features. there are

indeed free elections, but free at the same time. the press, well, the press is controlled by the government, the economy is controlled by the government, all processes except electoral ones are controlled by the government in one way or another, and this is not something that pleases the western countries very much to receive, and turkey takes such a position in nato exclusively because of its huge simply military potential and turkey's involvement turkey since i remember 1955. it seems like a member of nato, and well, turkey is very much integrated into the structures of nato, that's why we allow ourselves, that is, it's not even here, the arc itself allows itself such games and that's the same it's not just that it's not that it's not happening for the sake of just for the sake of increasing the authority of the rainbow himself in the region and so on, it's still money, it's trivially big money, and the turkish lira, together with the russian ruble, is one of the weakest currencies in this region. yes,

inflation is huge there all the successes that we constantly hear about, but we don't forget that all the information we have from turkey is government information, first of all, about successes, about the fact that they are the first there, the first that they are already launching into cosmo, and so on, but when you look at the economic indices, the situation, as they say, is completely different. yes, it is not as successful as erdogan talks about it, and he needs money and he earns a lot from russia, money is just russia. and it seems to me at the moment that putin, due to some reasons which we don't know, but let's say so, he will understand that he is the one on the cows. he still wants to be milked, after all, by kissing, so to speak , somewhere, not just rude, so, well, you

understand, i don't want to say obscene things the word well and all the more so considering what rdagan handed over to the zelensky commander in azov and obviously, this was also such a public public slap to putin and putin is obviously also paying for the same one more short question and i hope for a short answer in the big 20 don't wait ukraine will be in new delhi on september 9-10, why do you think the big twenty? well, the receiving party, india, does not want to see ukraine. well, it does not wait. and this is the position of the receiving party, so yes. india is very brief. india declares this very often, and we must understand

the third world, or shall we say the world that is not included in the combination of the west, russia and china, they believe that the west pays too much attention to the problem, which against the background of the problems that bother them is considered too much of an exaggeration , there are simply many problems in the world, india simply says that in india there is a terrible drought in india terrible problems will be with food this year and this one, well, considering that this is a country of one and a half billion people, there are such problems. well, it concerns tens or hundreds of millions of people" or

like it on facebook. we wish you good health to everyone take care of yourself and your loved ones goodbye congratulations this is bbc ukraine today we are talking about russia's space mission and its fiasco in the studio olga palamaryuk the russian space project failed the luna 25 module crashed into the moon this was supposed to be the first such mission of post-soviet russia and the first after the beginning of the new lunar race, in which several countries participate , what went wrong, the russian space project luna 25 failed as planned on august 21, the module was supposed to land on the south pole of the moon , however, only a week after the launch on