[000:00:00;00] for the next plenary meeting, the next plenary meeting, a full package of proposals for the denunciation of treaties concerning the russian federation and the cis and belarus is being held today. as we can see, this did not happen. according to our information , a small package like this is being prepared for tomorrow's meeting . i would call it is in the committee on foreign affairs as of today. until now, despite the appeal , three such appeals of the chairman of the verkhovna rada to the cabinet of ministers ministry of foreign affairs

the cabinet of ministers has not prepared such proposals, so i want to ask once again what should happen in our country so that finally, after one and a half years of war, we do not have more than 300 bilateral treaties with the russian federation, more than two hundred within the framework of the cis and more than 100 active treaties with belarusians. i hope that the chairman of the verkhovna rada still receives an answer, because if not, i think it is necessary to take some other measures regarding the cabinet of ministers' inaction, thank you, thank you european solidarity goncharenko pas team own goncharenko fedina sofia romanivna oleksiy goncharenko european solidarity as we see we have received so much from belarus that we cannot finally with this ukraine occupied by russia unfortunately and with this puppet regime lukashenko to break all these agreements it must be done once and

for all because we see how it is like this scoundrel how does this potato fuhrer come out periodically and something is barking at our country, it is not enough that death flies to us from there, it is not enough that they came to us from there to kill and butcher in buch , irpin, gostomel, to kill ukrainians, he is also something is still coming out, talking and telling, his last interview appeared . another traitor diana panchenko. by the way, i have a question: where is the reaction of the security service of ukraine, where are the criminal cases against these journalists and people like her who served the interests of russia, and then they swore something in dear ukraine, the armed forces then disappeared. they fled again to russia, to donetsk, somewhere else, and from there they now serve the enemy and the occupier, and then they have apartments

, houses in ukraine, live beautifully, some work, and we see people worthy of a pension, and panchenko demands the reaction of the security service to all this, and lukashenko, and i want to say, you are a scoundrel . listen to me. we will find you, we will hang you on a pole, we will show you your effigy to the children so that they see what happens to scoundrels like you, who destroy your own country and destroy our country. you will be responsible for everything, you can only dream of gaga, you will not live to see gaga, please voice of yurchyshyn yaroslav romanovych solomiya bobrovskaya please solomiya bobrovskaya fraction voice of the honorable president mr. oleksandr ms. elena

since there is no mr. speaker he literally six months ago, i gave instructions in this room at my request to the chairman of the foreign affairs committee regarding the preparation of a package of all agreements that require the denunciation of treaties. already at the next meeting , it is shameful that more or over or about half a thousand such agreements within the framework of agreements with the republic of belarus with the russian federation within the framework of the so-called union of independent states were concluded and are still operating in our country. i think this is humiliating and we have enough intellectual capacity together of the verkhovna rada and the government to denounce and vote in one package all this all this history that should be thrown into the trash i am very grateful thank you thank you let's move on to voting i am putting to a vote the proposal to accept as a basis in

general with the necessary technical and legal amendments the draft law with registration number 02.11 draft law on the termination of the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the republic of belarus on labor activity social protection of citizens of ukraine and the republic of belarus who work outside their countries and the protocol between the cabinet of ministers of ukraine and the government of the republic of belarus on the introduction of amendments to the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the republic of belarus on the right to work social protection of citizens of ukraine and the republic of belarus who work abroad i ask my states to vote in favor of 268 decisions, the law was adopted , the following draft law was adopted as a whole without discussion , therefore, do not disagree with the draft law

registration number 02.12 on withdrawing from some international treaties concluded within the framework of the commonwealth of independent states i am putting to a vote the proposal to accept as a basis as a whole with the necessary technical and legal amendments i ask to vote for 264 decision adopted law of adoption as a whole further can without discussion next good european solidarity requires discussion under registration number 0216, the draft law on the termination of the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the russian federation on international road transport and the protocol on the application of the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the russian federation on international road traffic i am putting to a vote the proposal to consider this

issue under a shortened procedure for 226, the decision was adopted, two for two against , please, please, please, servant of the people oleg valeriiyovych oleg semenskyi, please pass the floor, please, from the seat dear colleagues , at

its meeting, the committee on foreign policy and inter-parliamentary cooperation considered the draft law on termination of the cabinet of ministers agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the russian federation on international road traffic and the protocol on application, we have come to accept the exhibition as a basis and in general, taking into account the technicalities of legal rules, so please support this bill and terminate this agreement, thank you, please european solidarity bondar mykhailo leontiovych, please give the floor to fellow student maria ivanovna maria ivanovna , please european solidarity dear colleagues , the decision to terminate the validity of this agreement is really permanent and all other e-e agreements must be

to denounce the aggressor country, european solidarity will of course advocate and support this decision. however, together with our international partners, we still have to strengthen the sanctions restrictions against the russian federation against russian investments, and this money should be directed not only to the reconstruction of our country, but not compensation to the families of the dead and the families of the treatment of the wounded, and therefore parliamentary diplomacy should continue to demand from international organizations an adequate response to of the naval blockade in the black sea regarding nuclear blackmail regarding the detonation of vakhovsky and hpp regarding the targeted killing of our civilians and, of course, the deportation of ukrainian citizens, primarily children, and international partners should strengthen and expand those sanctions, restrictions regarding russian atomic energy, regarding the agribusiness of maritime trade operators but at the same time, we ourselves in this hall and in other powerful offices must adhere to unity not on the words of auditors, we

must work together on this parliamentary diplomacy, and not cover up with some educational moments , uh, self-righteousness in the majority and stop parliamentary interaction with the whole world, together we must prepare systemic changes regarding our veterans and veterans, and not allow whether you or other deputies or veterans, depending on political affiliation, to submit sector bills in a timely manner of security and defense to restore freedom of speech and finally remove the pro-russian representative from the head of the committee on freedom of speech for us european solidarity more than nine years of war after all ideology is the provision of an army of veterans, the movement to its senate and freedom of speech, and therefore i would like to have you and i in this hall after all . this is the bloody time of war. our task here is for all of these pro-russian three three from the committee, please vasylchenko hunger

strike solomia bobrovska, please solomiya bobrovska faction of the voice once again appeals to the prize of action with a request to instruct the specialized committee of foreign affairs together with the ministry of foreign affairs to work out the number of agreements that we voted for as a package and not for the 16th month of the war were ashamed of the voting of these individual, their unfortunate draft laws on withdrawal from certain agreements. i ask you to take this seriously and ask once again that the parliament must be motivated and intellectually capable in order to terminate all possible agreements with the russian federation and the republic of belarus with e-e within the framework of which were concluded within the framework of the cis i am already silent about the fact that we do not fully understand our relationship with the islamic state of iran thank you thank you e-e

mykhailo mykhailovych tsimbalyuk motherland mykhailo tsymbalyuk, no less, give the floor to grigory nemiry, please dear colleagues well, think about the absurdity we are now discussing for more than 9 years, how russia annexed crimea , it has been more than 9 years, how russia has annexed donbas , it has been a year and a half, how russia has unleashed a large-scale war against ukraine and occupied 20 % of the territory of sovereign, independent ukraine, and we are all discussing the issue of withdrawing from the agreement between ukraine and the russian federation on international road traffic. well, what an absurd question. why is this happening? colleague bobrovska said that

the committee should be instructed to work on this issue together with the ministry of foreign affairs. i want to inform you whether there have already been repeated appeals to the cabinet of ministers to the ministry of foreign affairs as a result. in my opinion, we are dealing with a situation where the ministry of foreign affairs has removed itself from this case because ministry of foreign affairs 100 the ministry that initiated the corresponding agreement should also initiate the termination of this agreement. but remember how many ministries were created and how many were disbanded. i think that this is actually sabotage. we must put an end to it. this shameful fact and finally achieve that the cabinet of ministers in the near future, as promised to the speaker of the verkhovna rada, submits to the parliament a complete package of documents related to the exit from the agreements between ukraine and the russian federation of ukraine and within the framework of the cis

, as well as some wishes related to belarus , only after that we must you consider your case done thank you for your attention , we proceed to the vote dear colleagues, i am putting to the vote the proposal to accept as a basis in general, with the necessary technical and legal practices, a draft law with a registration number 0216 draft law on the termination of the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the russian federation on international road traffic and the protocol on the application of the agreement between the government of ukraine and the government of the russian federation on international road traffic, i ask you to vote for 262 decisions, the law was adopted as a whole, coming to the next item on the

agenda, the draft law with registration norm 7316 draft law on amendments to article 8 of the law of ukraine on critical infrastructure on dispute settlement the subject of which is the state's ownership of critical infrastructure objects that are state-owned, the second reading, will anyone insist on corrections or speeches, please motherland motherland 5 minutes and european solidarity a lot yes, okay , then let's now, as they say, let the homeland go and let's move on to you. please , serhii volodymyrovych, will someone from you

please, vlasenko, 5 minutes. for any country, this is a cornerstone story that is a state-forming inviolability of the right to property, this is the basic principle of the existence of any economy and any state, and the motherland supported bills that related to the order if it is necessary for the state to protect against armed aggression, it is necessary to temporarily seize certain objects from the owners objects of property, we understand the need for this, we understand the need for this, the only thing we do not understand we do not understand why, two years after the end of martial law, it is not possible to provide a claim to those owners who believe that their interests have been violated. we do not understand why two years after the post-war state of war their own cannot get their property back and the state should not settle with it . in order to fight against the aggressor, she then

spoke about the fact that during the state of war and for another two years after that, no one can to protect one's rights nowhere, including the court, in my opinion, everything is absolutely dubious from the point of view of the ukrainian constitution. so, i state that the draft law, well, i would put it mildly, has become better compared to the first reading, but it still did not come out of its unconstitutionality. if in the first reading we were offered to say in general that the courts do not consider these disputes, today the wording is softer, but still questionable and such that it allows the state to essentially gain control over any property and keep this control without control sorry for such a pun during

the entire period of martial law and also during the two years since the end of martial law i will emphasize once again if during the period of martial law it can still be somehow understood if these the potential is completely and non-corruptly directed to protect ukraine from armed aggression. so two years after the war, this is an absolutely unjustified story, it all shows a complete disregard for the basic principles of jurisprudence and a complete disregard for such an institution as private property. i want to say to everyone who today talks a lot about the investment climate after the war such laws do not improve the investment climate after the war, but they destroy even those shaky prerequisites that today do not exist in order to invite

an investor, no conscious investor who is effective and correct european investors will not come to ukraine knowing that their property can be seized and they will not be able to defend it even in court. if this property has even the slightest relation to what we call critical infrastructure, it seems to me that with these laws we are doing a disservice to the creation of an investment climate in ukraine and this will definitely lead to the fact that a large number of people who we could invest money in the economy of ukraine even now during the war and especially after the end of the war simply will not will do this because dear colleagues, i urge you to think seriously about what to do with this law and how it should be drafted and ukrnafta should work.

negotiations i would like us to congratulate the prime minister of the republic of finland, mr. petteri orpo, as well as the delegation

of the republic of finland, which is in ukraine today, in the hall of the parliament . we will continue our work if you are serious i don't make the corrections correctly, i understand, no, you have european solidarity to take into account the corrections or only to confirm the corrections to be taken into account? then , please , let's start with the corrections to be taken into account. because, first of all , you cannot critically vote for this draft law because it is characterized by businessmen , investors and all adequate people and the public environment as a constitutional document that should legitimize legal arbitrariness. and what now proposed by this draft law it will completely cancel all possible investments it will not inspire confidence in our ukrainian state in the economic processes

that are taking place and in fact this draft law it legalizes raiding on a large scale and it legalizes legal arbitrariness in relation to property, not only is the constitution of ukraine violated, but also very many provisions of various laws, but in fact this draft law was pushed into the hall by i apologize because of the wrong way and this law is about what cannot to do in please support please i put the committee the answer of people's deputy fedina ariyeva pavlenko was rejected by the committee on what concerns us the amendment of article eight please this dienko yes thank you the amendment was rejected by the committee and i would like to add that after we have worked through this

draft law the key moment who left that, after all, these are state critical infrastructure facilities that provide more than 50%. it is state property, and we are talking about the fact that during the martial law war, there will be no theft of state property, friends. i ask you to support this draft law. thank you. i am putting to a vote the proposal to take into account the amendment of people's deputy fedina and colleagues by the rejection committee. i ask you to vote for 62. the decision was not taken . or this or that property and violation of any legal

procedure, in particular, what is proposed in this draft law is the unconstitutional ban on the life of measures to ensure the claim during judicial review of cases during martial law two years after the end of martial law regarding bankruptcy and their prohibition article 129-1 of the constitution of ukraine legalization of state raiding of entire enterprises and overtime expansion of the powers of the cabinet of ministers of the national securities commission of the stock market and other structures in relation to this or that property violates all norms of civilized coexistence, in particular business and the state as such, please support the 22nd amendment, i am putting

the proposal to the vote to take into account the amendment number 22 fedyna arieva pavlenko was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 72, the decision was not made, the truth remains rejected, the next 35 is actually about the fact that there is no normal and adequate justification for the fact that within two years after the end of martial law, it is not possible to implement normal mechanisms and communication and restore the working capacity of bankruptcy cases, appeals in courts, etc. please tell me that within two years after the end of martial law, there will be some internal machinations european solidarity should be carried out, in particular. in my amendments, i propose no more than 90 days

from the date of the termination or cancellation of martial law, but in fact everywhere insists on two years, and i will remind you that we already had one draft law that made it possible to raid any enterprises, any territories without of the appeal rules for the next 10 years after the end of martial law, this is some very sick trend, therefore, i suggest to support the washing machine 35 to track the deadline of 90 days after recruitment. i put it to the vote the proposal to take into account the amendment number 35 of people's deputy fedyn and colleagues by the committee, it was rejected, i ask you to vote for 68, the decision was not taken, the amendment remains rejected, what is the next amendment, number 52, and i have the impression that my colleagues from the monomajority absolutely do not understand what they are voting for

. what kind of raiding mechanisms are they enacting in particular, the analysts who studied this draft law came to the conclusion that in particular it will have a very negative impact on the energy industry of the country, as they emphasize, it completely destroys market mechanisms, in particular so the so-called gallantry of payment is the owners of energy resources, in particular coal and natural gas. they will not sell the operator's products, realizing in advance that there are no legal mechanisms that would protect the right of the seller to receive compensation for product deliveries. colleagues from the mono majority, you will realize that you are destroying elementary market mechanisms and mechanisms communication of authorities, business, suppliers, and so on, there should be a transparent and responsible

mechanism instead of simply translating everything into manual mode, i ask you to support the project. i put it on the head, which number is 552. i put to a vote the proposal to take into account the amendment number 52 of the people's deputies. it is rejected. i ask you to vote for 71. the decision has not been adopted. the amendment remains rejected further. of critical infrastructure due to 100% risks of not receiving payment and lack of judicial mechanisms

to protect your own rights, you listen . that is, we say we understand that there is a state of war there must be certain restrictions. and when but when neither business nor citizens can legally protect or at least establish some frameworks of civilized cooperation. well, we are sliding towards a totalitarian state. it is enough that the ministry of defense made one hundred percent overpayments for non-existent contracts for uah 36 billion. colleagues, please. to support the washing machine 74 in order to limit this unrest a little, and the 74 amendment is taken into account by the committee , it is not yours, so please, can you do something well, it is written differently in the table let's then check the table or i don't know, but according to this work i can't put it without consideration, it has already been taken into account, there are other