[000:00:00;00] protection of your own rights, you listen. that is, we are saying that we understand that there is martial law, there must be certain restrictions. but when, when , neither business nor citizens can legally protect or at least establish some frameworks for civilized cooperation. of defense made one hundred percent overpayments for non-existent contracts for uah 36 billion, colleagues, i ask you to support washing machine 74 in order to somehow limit this arbitrariness a little, and the 74 amendment is taken into account by the committee it's not yours, so please, can you do something well, it's written differently in the table. let's check the table then, i don't know, but for this work i can't disregard it , it's already taken into account, there are further

wishes for the following edits 83 wait, i'll check is it no, it is also taken into account by another deputy, your amendment 81, give a different table because in my table it is my amendment, yes , your truth 81 is the closest to 83 8, what is this situation with different tables, i am very sorry , was everything in order at first, or between the first in the second reading, the amendments were also changed to before being brought to the hall or how i can’t give you a serious answer to this, do you

have the truth in the electronic spreadsheet in the electronic one, too, no, it’s 81, most likely, i think , please, 81 sofia, they gave me a new one the table here is not, it is generally very incorrect that the tables are changed at the last moment before the hall is brought to the discussion, but we also wanted to emphasize that all the things i previously talked about, it is before entering the heating season, except for the destruction of the ukrainian energy system may be accompanied by additional crisis phenomena for operators, insufficient supply of fuel and energy resources, lack of necessary equipment for repairs, and in this context , i would like to emphasize that such draft laws are collapsing the infrastructure of the ukrainian state, critical infrastructure is collapsing , and when it is not possible to establish transparent rules of cooperation, when there is no transparent mechanism of responsibility, appeals and so on

, such draft laws cannot be accepted cleanly raiding and indecisiveness, i ask you to support the 81st exercise, the 81st exercise was rejected by the committee, the people's deputy of fedina and colleagues, i ask you to vote the proposal to count for 77, the decision has not been made, the truth remains rejected, please continue number 90 90 of the prophet, please. i would like to emphasize that the ban on court proceedings regarding disputes objects of critical infrastructure is not consistent with the content of article part four of article 13 of the constitution of ukraine, according to which the state ensures the protection of all subjects

of the right of ownership and management, and all the subjects of property rights are equal before the law, it seems to me that after all , the constitution of ukraine is and should remain the main and fundamental legislative act that we have in general and on which the activities of the supreme council of committees and everything else should be based. i understand that parliamentarism is being nullified, i understand that the status of a people's deputy is nullified when people's deputies are not allowed to attend certain meetings even well, but i'm sorry , this draft law clearly violates the constitution and this should have been the main reason

for not even bringing it to the hall, please to support the amendment, i am putting to a vote amendment no. 90 of the people's deputy of fedina, the committee rejected the proposal to take into account, i ask you to vote for 61, the decision was not taken, the amendment remains rejected, the next number 93 93, colleagues, already in these 4 years, we have had dozens, if not more , of examples when the verkhovna rada voted and then had to urgently to vote on a bunch of bills because the provisions there were not consistent with other laws because the terminology did not match because it contradicted certain procedures and here we we have the same situation again when new terminology is used in the draft law that contradicts the current legislation . how are you going to then put everything together for you? article 116 will not help the constitution, the civil code of ukraine, and the laws of ukraine. draft law i understand that now you are going to dump all this on the technique of legal corrections, but i apologize in this

draft law there are a lot of such moments that cross out all this, god forbid that in this the specific draft law was crossed out and it was not effective in order not to be destroyed may the voting side offer to take into account the rejected amendment number 93 of the people's deputies fedina arieva pavlenko of the committee it was rejected please vote for 61 the decision was not adopted the next amendment 102 102 i have already emphasized that there is not the slightest justification why we have a two-year period after the end of martial law or its abolition, during which it is proposed not to consider legal disputes, but

at the same time, the project proposal does not contain the completed mechanism of implementation does not contain any prescriptions, such as having to add a court in the event of an appeal to it with a similar claim , and there is also no explanation of how the court should act if at the time of martial law proceedings such proceedings were already open and at the time of the entry into force of the changes in of this draft law, that is, in fact , the problems have not been solved here, as was foreseen by the original version, and the problems are simply accumulating , building up, and in essence there will be either total raiding and a manual mode of resource management, or there will simply be total chaos

support the amendment 102 i am putting to a vote the proposal to take into account the amendment rejected by the committee 102 by the people's deputy of the vessels, i ask my colleagues to vote for 57 the decision was not taken, the next shipment is not taken into account 103 and it is partially taken into account. please, who will start ? i have a list of them, number four . is this still oleksiy oleksiyovych, please, number 12? so the 12th amendment is good, and this is an amendment that speaks in general about the name of this law, which absolutely does not meet today's needs, because this law is a poor

investment climate, it creates corruption risks crazy crazy imagine a law under which you can simply take away property and offer to take it and transfer corporate rights and property to the administration of the ministry of defense and this can be done simply by the cabinet of ministers. well, we have already seen the ministry of defense and their administration. unfortunately , we respect a lot of people in the ministry of defense but when we talk about today's leadership at the level of the minister of some deputies who are already in pre-trial detention centers well, we have all seen eggs for 17 hryvnias and everything else, i put this amendment for confirmation dear colleagues, i put the proposal for amendment number 12, it is taken into account by the committee, people's deputy goncharenko puts it on confirmation

, i ask you to vote for the amendment for vitnevich, colleagues, i ask you to vote for 200, the decision has not been made, the amendment has not been confirmed, and the next amendment is 24 , please oleksiy oleksiyovych thank you thank you, dear mr. chairman, amendment number 24 is it at all crazy law. she says that it is not allowed to open bankruptcy proceedings in order to restore the solvency of critical infrastructure objects in the state infrastructure . a country with the rule of law or not, the basic european values ​​about which we talked so much are democracy

, human rights, the rule of law, that is why this the flag can be next to ours. i congratulate everyone once again on the national flag day of ukraine, but if we want our flag to fly in europe in brussels near the european parliament, then we must adhere to the basic principles. and this is a complete leveling of these principles . of the amendment, it is partially taken into account by the committee oleksiy oleksiyovych honcharenko offers to confirm it, i put it in the edition in which the committee partially took it into account, i ask you to vote for 209 the decision was not taken, the amendment was not

confirmed, what is the next grade 3 i will skip a couple of rules so that yes, the 31st, let's move on right away, now, one second, the reference of the committee members is partially taken into account , this is a correction, you know, i know, this will be a repetition of only the same words, i want to take the opportunity today is serhiy zhadana's birthday, let's, friends, let's all applaud this is our national poet, our national hero, whose today i think it is very important to remember him and hear his prophetic words, that's why i confirm this edit , i don't understand how this edit is related to my colleague serhiy zhadan, but we wish him health and prosperity in the work that he does for our country is very important. i put in consideration in the editorial board of the committee exercise number 30 is partially taken into account, in confirmation i put in consideration the partially taken into account amendment number 31

of the members of the committee zavitnevich and oleg, on the proposal of oleksiy oleksiyovych honcharenko , i ask you to vote in the editorial office in which committee is partially taken into account for 218 decision not adopted amendment not taken into account we can move on to the law already colleagues what is next oleksia oleksiyovych 32 the practice is absolutely unconstitutional which prohibits provision of shame that contradicts the constitution of ukraine and the rule

of law . please about the basic things about the basic about the rule of law about what should be the defense in court simplify the things that we cannot neglect if we we are going to become members of the european union, and that is why, friends, it is very important, let's fail this work, which is taken into account there , because it absolutely does not correspond to the constitution of ukraine. in general, the constitution of ukraine should be

something inviolable for us, because it is this constitution that protects our rights if we allow ourselves to be ignored it is in such important laws, then we are destroying everything in our country, there is no economic strategy in the state, instead of an economic strategy, they push us such bills after their adoption, no one no one will come here with investments at all, and the country will simply turn into a laughing stock. amendment number 32 33 of people's deputy poziychuk is partially taken into account by the committee , and my colleague goncharenko proposes and confirms it, so i put

the following proposal . vote for 216. the amendment is not confirmed . to pay attention to the fact that with this amendment we actually deprive ourselves of the possibility of opening bankruptcy procedures, in fact , if we adopt such a rule, we grant an indulgence for the prohibition of opening and the introduction of bankruptcy proceedings exclusively for business companies that are operators of critical infrastructure , this is a violation of, including, our international obligations . not to make a decision on it is positive because it actually destroys and is one that deprives us of the possibility of a rule of law to resolve disputes, thank you amendment number 36 of people's deputy zavitnevych and colleagues from

the committee partially taken into account people's deputy friz proposes to vote and for confirmation, i ask to vote for 221, the decision has not been made and the next amendment, 37th, please also confirm it because it does not correspond to the current legislation, it violates the constitution and our international obligations, thank you. i am putting to the vote the proposal to confirm amendment number 37 the committee partially took into account the amendment

of the committee members, i ask you to vote for 219, the decision was not adopted, the amendment was not confirmed, the next 37 eighth is good, thank you very much, the amendment, which is the 38th, does not apply at all subject of the regulation of this project and there is no justification for its introduction. i would like to emphasize that this amendment is an actual violation, a gross violation of article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, which prohibits the introduction of any legislative changes to the codes at the same time . 38 well, there are no changes to the nokia code in it. i am putting to a vote the proposal to support confirm the amendment number 38 of the people's deputies of the members of the committee of the committee

, it is fully taken into account, please vote for 221 the decision was not taken, the amendment is not taken into account, next, who is next , frieze, please yes, thank you, please confirm the 39th amendment , this is the final amendment, which i ask to confirm, because it is a vote, a proposal to confirm the amendment number 39 of people's deputies, members of the committee , it is taken into account, please vote for 219 the decision has not been made, the amendment has not

been confirmed, then we proceed to the voting of the law in general, good. legal punctuation bill with registration number 8316 draft law on amending article 8 of the law of ukraine on critical infrastructure regarding the settlement of disputes the subject of which is the right of ownership of the state to critical infrastructure objects that are in state ownership, i ask you to vote for 219 the decision was not made legally adopted by factions yes, there is a proposal to send the draft law for a repeated second

reading 83:16 i ask you to vote for 230 the decision has been made on the draft law on the right to a repeated second reading dear colleagues we move on without discussing the issue of draft resolution 9620 on amendments to the resolution of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the formation of a temporary investigative commission of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the investigation of possible violations of the legislation of ukraine in the implementation of public procurement during martial law regarding inclusion in the composition of the temporary investigative commission representative from the european solidarity faction of the political party, the proposal to accept as a whole , taking into account the proposal of the committee, with

the necessary technical and legal amendments i ask you to vote for 73, the decision was not adopted, the resolution was rejected by factions from the procedure, iryna volodymyrivna, please, gerashchenko. dear colleagues, what have you just not supported? the tsk was created, which will investigate corruption in the field of procurement. the faction of european solidarity delegated our representative there and we previously agreed that everything will be supported. i understand that now we see such a desire to bury all the corruption stories, this is from the procedure, this is from the procedure, and i

ask that we i ask that we comply of the agreements reached at the conciliation council, this resolution was supported by the regulatory committee unanimously, all factions have the right to delegate representatives of the tsc, especially when it comes to propositional factions, dear chairman, we ask you to once again put to a vote the resolution that volodymyra ariev has the right to work in the tsc e- led by pansable panzabele i ask you to take the floor now and get this demand of european solidarity thank you very much reply yes colleagues indeed i we submitted three resolutions about the inclusion of those representatives of the faction who were unable to enter at first, this is the representative of the european solidarity faction - this is the representative of the trust group, the noble hall , for some reason it has not been included yet, i ask my colleagues to support us so that we have a full representation of all factions in our temporary investigative commission, if there are any questions so that the quotas are preserved maybe then it is necessary

to add representatives of other factions so that the corresponding quotas are preserved thank you colleagues, thank you if you paid attention in the past of this convocation 9 procedural questions it was not the person who chaired it that put it again, so if olena kostina is ready, i can hand over the chair to her now. if you are ready , i am always ready. dear colleagues, i once again ask the question of voting on the draft law 96:20 draft resolution on amendments to the resolution of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the creation of a temporary investigative commission of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the investigation of possible violations of the legislation of ukraine in the implementation of the fruits of public procurement during the period of martial law regarding the inclusion

of a representative from the faction in the composition of the tsk of the european solidarity political party, please. dear colleagues. this is really a procedural issue. i will put it to a vote . please decide for 94. the decision has not been taken. discussion for all of us, we will have the words european solidarity and we express our indignation at the way you are now

destroying parliamentarism with such petty mischief for now your representatives they say to your majority that this is how they punish european solidarity for incorrect voting for voters. i want to say that in principle, in this hall there is formally a monomajority that has 250 votes, but for all the votes today it gave a maximum of 160-170,000 because it does not exist in nature it is the majority, and for some reason the correct and incorrect votes are hanging on the job . dear colleagues, we just have the issue of blocking resolutions, and we agreed on this non -consensually, and we will stand by this agreement we now have five blocking resolutions, so we are moving on to their consideration gradually, since we have them uh. we have the issue with the registration number 54-31p of the draft resolution on the cancellation of the decision of the verkhovna rada on the adoption in the second reading and in general

of the draft law amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine regarding the improvement of the activity of the antimonopoly committee, please consider it according to the abbreviated procedure, separate voting is not required from the authors yulia volodymyrivna tymoshenko reports, please dear colleagues faction tymoshenko's homeland, we are currently considering with you the practical repeal of the law that has already been adopted by the verkhovna rada, which concerns the improvement of the antimonopoly committee's activities, well, you know very well today . talking to all entrepreneurs in ukraine, you know that entrepreneurs today are in the system of the most brutal repressions by the power structures that only were during all times of ukraine's independence. you know that

empty criminal cases are initiated against entrepreneurs, that they are searched, that huge fines are imposed on them, that they they block the return of vat, and against this background bribes are demanded and these bribes are distributed among law enforcement agencies. such terror as is being perpetrated against entrepreneurs in ukraine has never been seen before. this law on improving the activities of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine will multiply this terror, because this law turns the antimonopoly committee into a full-fledged law enforcement agency. a structure with the authority to break into offices and residential premises interfere with the electronic communication system with the electronic

information storage system of entrepreneurs is the unprecedented transformation of the antimonopoly committee into a force structure that directly contradicts the provisions used in the european union because there is no requirement to grant the national competition order powers to seize or seize property or any other functions of the force structures, please cancel this terrorist law that called thank you, yuliya volodymyrivna, please request to sign up later, and there was a proposal against without discussion, but colleagues want to discuss all blocking resolutions as we just found out, please, homeland oleksiyovych kucherenko, yuliya volodymyrivna, please, please pass on the floor yuliya

tymoshenko, please dear colleagues, i want to finish my speech and say that now you have a chance to return the antimonopoly committee to its normal functions yes he must monitor the quality of the competitive environment in ukraine yes, he must have the tools, but it is impossible for the antimonopoly committee to essentially engage in corruption, because this draft law not only provides for its functions as a power structure, but also he is given the discretion to use very strong power tools that are not regulated by any law in principle, but the antimonopoly committee is given the opportunity to act if the power structures can