[000:00:00;00] changes here, let her conduct negotiations on the withdrawal of russian troops from the territory of ukraine, and this will be her wonderful, big contribution to our victory, you will only applaud , talk about other negotiations, it seems to me that it is simple either to demonstrate your complete professional unsuitability or, well, just to speculate on this topic, you mentioned mr. volodymyr, the horseman of the nuclear apocalypse , dmitry medvedev, there is one more horseman, this is volodymyr solovyov, and he proposed to test tactical nuclear weapons in robotics, we know that the armed forces ukraine has liberated this settlement in zaporizhzhia, let's hear what another horseman is saying, it's an ideal, just an ideal

place for changing tactical nuclear weapons, i 'm not the only one who wants to collect an ideal, simple, and on this give way to a group covered with a copper basin. the enemy's reserve and even the subject forces that would be fully able to advance and very well liberated from zaporizhzhia. and maybe even in the dnipropetrovsk region and a full load of only processing that fights imperceptible encirclements and defeat and if we take another place with kupyatsky , then they continue the same topic. that is, it is nuclear blackmail, nuclear terrorism, and putin's regime, and well, we seem to be used to these words before that what they are saying and they have been saying this for a year and a half or so, the west now has enough mechanisms to change

the kremlin's rhetoric or screw up this rhetoric or is it very important for moscow to send these signals to its own population that they are so big and invincible or still they try to export fear to the west well what they usually export well probably today here i'll allow myself to disagree with you a little i don't think he's uh horseman i think he's just an information whore uh here we have to to put dots over and solovyov eh for the role of a rider, well, he is not suitable at all, the truth is, and the first eh, when in the stage eh, yes , that is, it is also this, too. as a joke, so to speak, but seriously

so uh, this is exclusively pumping into our own population with hurray patriotic theses, today uh, hur uh, he informed us that he got information that a new uh, so to speak, strategic line uh, in the information war, certain uh topics have been approved in moscow which today, so to speak, must be paid attention to in russia and abroad, and it is obvious that this internal temperature must be raised in order for all this to fall on such a well-prepared soil . i think that putin was warned a long time ago for him personally, even an attempt to think about the use of tactical nuclear weapons would mean uh, and for some reason it seems to me that

he heard this uh information because he is very afraid for his life, and there are such uh such people who openly call for committing uh -e of war crimes eh well, it seems to me that finally it is necessary not only to warn about their responsibility , but also to look for tools to implement this responsibility .

this drone has the correct address so that finally, these people who afford such things could no longer afford such things and went to the concert in kobzon because uh , you understand the lack of reaction uh practical reaction no no not verbal non-verbal but practical reaction only encourages such statements and they are criminal in their essence well, you hinted that those who speak and those who act as propagandists of putin's regime are talking to our tv viewers, i will explain that it is obviously about margarita simonyan, because several times she is nearby somewhere in her neighborhood in moscow were hit by drones and she constantly writes about it. well, god forbid that our drones be more accurate and hit those targets . where are they flying? sergei, we don’t know everyone ’s address, so we will have to ask our colleagues

and we all write to our colleagues in the special services so that they after all, they clarified the details, and then i think that for many, after the first , by the way, uh, demonstrative punishment, i think that for many, the truth will be revealed and they will understand that it is probably better to bite their propaganda tongues, volodymyr, more about one statement i wanted to ask you about volodymyr zelenskyi's statement on crimea, he said that when the defense forces enter the administrative border with occupied crimea, it will be possible to push for the demilitarization of russia in crimea through political means, we will hear what the supreme high command with the armed forces of ukraine said , there will be fewer casualties if we are on administrative or conditional borders a-a with crimea a-a i think that it is possible to politically

press for the demilitarization of russia on the territory of ukrainian crimea. i think that it would be better. i think so. well, i think first believe me about those who will carry it out, what does the statement mean to press for the demilitarization of russia in crimea by political means, well, mr. serhiy, here it would be necessary for ms. mosiychuk to ask this clarifying question, but she did not do it, and therefore we can only guess now what the president meant. but i it seems that political pressure can be deciphered at least. this is my version. i'm just offering it to you. it means that you just have to shell from crimea and then

the political decision will be the most optimal and what does it mean to turn the peninsula into an island, it means to interrupt the supply chains of weapons, equipment and personnel to the crimean territory, and then there will be two options for action or to congratulate the group of russian today i am in the territory of crimea to the point of total destruction, even non-contact, because in the event that we receive long-range missiles, including taurus and others, it will be possible to do this from the liberated territory in front of crimea, and then there will be

an option or destruction of this group on territory of the crimea or a political decision that this group reports how it came out from the e . from all supply chains on the part of the russian federation, this definitely implies that the e-e bridge across the kerch strait will follow the moscow cruiser three years ago, when the crimean platform was held for the first time, it was about

the political and diplomatic path to the liberation of crimea when we talk about the future separate, when volodymyr zelenskyy speaks, well, obviously, we should also talk about national autonomy in crimea, about which president poroshenko once spoke, they started this conversation, but this conversation did not continue and it somehow got stuck in it is clear in the air that we need to liberate crimea, the crimean peninsula, but here is the construction of what the future of crimea should be after the liberation of russia, is it time now and is it necessary to send signals, including to the crimean tatars, that you will be one of the hosts

of the crimean peninsula and, in principle, so that they understand what this is about, mr. sergey, i will tell you that uh, i really wanted this year's crimean platform to actually be the last one, why uh, this is again such a transparent hint that next august crimea will be finally and irrevocably freed from the russian horde, and then maybe we will hold a conference on the restoration of crimea as the restoration of the whole of ukraine , an integral part of which crimea is and is, and i think we should prepare this today, we should very clearly and clearly formulate the state policy regarding the crimea, it should be clear and understandable. and it is precisely under such circumstances that it will

be supported by the crimean tatars and the karaites and the crimeans who live on the territory of the peninsula and for whom the crimea is their historical the real homeland does not at all mean that ukrainians or representatives of other nationalities do not live there, and therefore we will have to construct an absolutely understandable , clear and, most importantly, fair concept of post-war crimea, i repeat once again how an integral part of ukraine, where several indigenous peoples live, and this is not, uh, you know, a mystery behind the seven seals is, uh, a completely acceptable international experience when uh, it is peaceful and, uh, the main thing is to successfully sing, uh, live

, cooperate and form their own common future, representatives of different peoples on the territory of one or another, let's say land or autonomy, etc. and so on, but this is a big job, first of all, for our lawyers, for our politicians, and so that all the interests of ukrainians and crimean tatars and representatives other peoples were taken into account as much as possible and i think it is quite realistic and perhaps now we really need to start gradual work in order to ultimately reach a very normal calm positive result on september 9-10, mr. volodymyr, the summit of the g20 will be held in noodlel, before that the brics itself took place in yuganets burge, the big twenty

will be held in india in judea, and putin will not fly to this summit because he told the sand that lavrov will be there instead of him on behalf of the president and did not receive an invitation the ukrainian state, in principle, in new delhi they say that they will talk about the economic future and it is not at all about the russian-ukrainian war or that there were any security issues . this is probably a rhetorical question. why do people in india believe that the economic future of india, including the results of the end of the russian-ukrainian war, is not connected with the future security architecture in

the world? actually, i think it is very good. understand, but being in the current situation and perhaps even under some political pressure that still exists in relations between russia and india , they decided not to escalate relations with russia because you are absolutely right rightly noted that the economy will be the central theme of this event, so regarding the economy and india's trade with russia, we remember how well from russia's point of view everything started with putin at all the intersections and not only he shouted that well, we are calm now we sell our oil to india for india was satisfied because it bought russian

oil at dumping prices, and it was bought for 30 billion dollars, the amount is really quite large , at the same time, it was able to sell its goods to russia for 6-7 billion dollars, but the peculiarity of this trade was that it took place in national currencies , and in russia , there is nothing to buy in india for 23 billion dollars, and because of this, by the way, today russia does not actually sell oil to india anymore, because it is not interested in accumulating currency that is not

is freely convertible. that is, in fact, it is only for bilateral trade relations, and they do not exist on such a scale, but you have the whole economy, so i think that india will also understand the trends very clearly and clearly. to speak absolutely sincerely, she wants to play some role of her own in this space of the global cock. she has her own ambitions, she clearly and clearly wants to demonstrate that she can also claim to be a certain center of power and therefore, now it will not be completely clear when russia loses, it is probably not an option for her yet. that is, she is watching the situation and will act according to how it will develop

when ukraine wins. believe me, i think that we have there will be a queue of indian politicians who will congratulate the ukrainian leadership on the victory over russia and say that the previous government, including the indian one , must have been very wrong, or they will say that we were simply misunderstood, if this is the case government believe me, everyone loves winners, and that's why our ukrainian-indian relations will again depend on how quickly the ukrainian army will defeat the russian horde, and then everything will change not only in the perimeter of the former ussr, which we just talked about, but also on the global stage equal because the defeat of russia will mean the defeat of the global totalitarianism, and then such changes will begin that you and

i cannot even dream of yet, but they will happen. and will the defeat of russia in ukraine be the defeat of china why am i asking about this now? i’m asking because i’m watching blumber report that putin is going to fly to the summit to the one belt one way forum, which will take place in october in china and it will probably be putin’s only trip after that, a foreign trip after that the fact that the international criminal court issued an arrest warrant for the president of russia even to turkey . putin is not flying, but he is waiting for erdogan on august 31 in sochi. well, it's true. putin is not traveling. rather, not now. -e china e-e and why a because there is a common border and to intercept such a plane. well, in principle, it is quite difficult, but even in turkey, the old woman is already puffing up here

, they say, i guessed that's why russia definitely remains a partner for china, and it does not want this partner to finally die. although if you look at once again, the economic statistics of the first half of this year showed that russia has really completely fallen under the control of china's economy and has turned into its raw material appendage, and the automobile industry of russia will practically not be able to get out of this state today. it ceased to exist, it became chinese because everything new that drives on the roads of russia today is chinese-made, the russian auto industry - i just take it as one of the examples, it actually ceased to exist, it is no longer there and it will continue to do the same gradually, but in all other directions, so that after

a certain period of time, i think that this gentleman who was on the left is unlikely to want to say hello so close to the criminal gentleman who was in the photo on the right because he will consider it for himself below his own dignity, although ideologically he will definitely try to somehow indirectly help that bandit to hold out as long as possible because , after all, the axis of evil that exists today is called moscow, beijing or beijing, what is the role of moscow in this axis and in general in the axis that is around russia let's say yes, not around china, because china is still big and there are more axes around beijing, there is a recipe and perdogan flies to putin three or two times, he publicly spoke about the fact that

he is waiting for vladimir putin on the territory of the turkish state, now it is known that the tape the kardaghan type flies to putin in sochi, and ordan is the only leader of a nato member country who flies to putin, who accepts putin and who has some contacts with him there, that is, how should erdogan's role be assessed in a different situation, considering that turkey integrated is the north atlantic alliance and they are more inclined to let's say yes to what is happening in the west, although erdogan also has well, i would say that there is full democracy in turkey, what do you see in this ideological moments, they in some situations in some situations

begin to play a decisive role, that is, yes turkey is a nato country, but it buys the russian s400. well, where is the logic ? where is the common line, so to speak, that the american systems are worse than the e 400, daniel, but a certain game is already starting there, and erdogan has recently demonstrated this ability to satisfy everyone is for their own benefit. that is, it seems to me that it is, to a certain extent , an unprincipled position, which is called national selfishness. i will communicate with the devil and with god, so that only my loved one would be well, but now i am actually erdoğan.

seems to draw exactly such a line to me it doesn't matter that putin is a criminal if his tourists come to turkey if russians buy real estate there if my tomatoes are sent to russia, then i will communicate even with a war criminal eh well, unfortunately , he is so eastern jesuit to a certain extent the line of conduct of mr. volodymyr, the ambassador of ukraine to germany, oleksiy makeev, called the indecisive military support of ukraine from western partners one of the reasons for the current pace of progress during the difficult ukrainian counteroffensive, russia had time to to prepare for the defense and said makeev in an interview, e.e., the deutschland fund and what does makeev say that a lot of time was spent on the preparation and equipping of the ukrainian brigades of the offensive brigades, e.e., how correct are the statements

of the ukrainian ambassador in this case, e.e. germany, despite the fact that in principle well, there are probably a lot of questions in germany. it could be addressed to the ukrainian leadership, which was not actively preparing for war, but was engaged in the development of highways in ukraine when they said that trenches should be dug in the south. and in general, such plans are often russia's great offensive against ukraine was questioned in the highest offices, and it was done publicly, well, it's true that our western partners also didn't want to see anything bad in russia and didn't want to do it during the last 30 years, so here we can, as they say, share the glory, and we and they, and it's exactly what we and they

missed in their assessments, and that we and they perceived russia until recently. well, i 'm saying that we're generalizing, of course - and your humble one has already spoken such words for a long time what is russia, but my colleagues and i just didn't want to hear it like that. since we all didn't see this beast together, now we all have to draw conclusions together, and i agree with ambassador makeev here, because the speed of decision-making depends on the speed of the link of this monster, and if we are talking about taurus markets

, then the statements of some german politicians seem cynical to me. well then, let them explain why russian eagles have so many spare parts from the same germany and why they don't tell putin that these eagles don't fly to the territory of ukraine, you know, politics is like that. unfortunately, it's a cynical thing, but despite this, we need to know what we it is necessary to gnaw away at one's interests under any circumstances , that's why i think that they should not be offended by the ambassadors. at the end of our program, mr. volodymyr, i wanted to ask your opinion about how diplomacy has changed in the world during the russian-ukrainian war. it is clear that

the way ukrainian representatives of the authorities set the tone for international diplomacy, so a lot of rules and regulations have changed. order and perception of information transfer of information and communication between leaders eh, what did you notice as a person who has worked all his life in the system of diplomatic relations, yes, my statements are absolutely correct eh, this is eh, an extreme situation of such eh, the world community seen since the end of the second world war, and in extreme situations you can't work with old methods and rules, then you obviously lose, that's why during the entire war , everything really changed, it seems to me that in many cases it's for the better when

formalities you know, diplomacy is such a rather conservative thing. so when these formalities were pushed aside, when direct diplomacy began, direct dialogue and not only with politicians but with the public, and this is very important, of course, after the end of the war, after the victorious end of the war, we gradually let's start to restore some elements of this traditional diplomacy because well , it should really be somewhat specific, but now when it comes to an extreme situation, i think that what has been proposed, including from our side and by our diplomats and our politicians and so on, is quite adequate volodymyr, i have to complete it, i'm sorry i have my own rules thank you for participating in the game it was volodymyr hryshko where a politician and a diplomat are friends it was a verdict program it was conducted by serhiy rudenko thank you i wish everyone

good health take care of yourself and your loved ones goodbye will there be a new wave of mobilization in ukraine, how transparent is it, we are talking about it in today's edition of the bbc. wants and is fine with anything to avoid mobilization or is it difficult to control conscription in wartime and what risks do men of conscription age take to avoid mobilization the longer the war lasts the greater