[000:00:00;00] such obkovi they did not comment, however, the attack on the airport is actively discussed on russian state tv channels, so the presenter volodymyr solovyov is convinced that the popskov attack drones were launched from the baltic countries, so-called russian journalists blogger serhii mordan assumed that the attack on the airport took place with the help of a sabotage and intelligence group that operated in the territory russia, meanwhile, the so-called russian military analyst volodymyr udarov missed that the drones were launched from the khmelnytskyi region of ukraine already, that is, that the drones were allegedly flew across the whole of belarus to russia valentin laborer military analyst director of the organization research center of the army conversion and disarmament guest of our broadcast at this moment i congratulate you good day thank you for joining mr. valentin well bryansk what is going on there in general has the situation with drone attacks turned out at all under the control of the russian military leadership or what do you expect from the kremlin and how can they explain this to the russians, because in fact it looks like this now

even for the russian society probably that they are not protected. i think that we should draw attention to some points , firstly, that in fact drone attacks are happening , well, practically non-stop, yes , that is, they are constantly going, continuing and constantly hitting something. when a long-range bomber aircraft was destroyed here 22m3 when it was completely destroyed and we see that drone attacks begin to play a more essential role they become elements or rather they harvest and destroy elements of defense

of russia's potential, this is extremely important, the important changes that are taking place and the fact that, let's say, two or four il-76 aircraft are disabled, this is also very powerful , because the il-76 aircraft is actually a military target - it's exactly those the planes they wanted to use to deliver the paratroopers to the gostomel airfield in order to capture kyiv, let's remember that they only managed to land certain groups there with a helicopter. and the task was, strictly speaking , to use a large number of such planes for such attacks, so the destruction of military transport aviation is depriving russians of russian mobility, transferring visas is a very important element, well, we definitely hope that in the future the possibility will be increased, or rather increased. well, the damage potential is not just

disabled, as aviation experts say, that it is there for 3-4 months to repair these planes. in general, that they are not completely destroyed, so to speak, but even such a fact as a threat and a promise from the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense the other day that the next target may be well, however, the next target may to be even a plant for the production of drones, this indicates that there is a powerful and rapid increase in the actual ability to hit russian objects in the territory of russia, deep in the depths of the territory of russia, this is a very important achievement and the moment about which you mentioned that whether it is protected or unprotected, russia is not protected because

the only country in the world that can be considered protected from missiles and drones is israel, and this country, as we all know, is very small in size, but russia is a very large country geographically scattered and in russia cannot in any way ensure the security of all infrastructure facilities of military special infrastructure . therefore, it is very good. well, it is news for us. well, it is not news , just such a characteristic. it is correct to say in general that the war is gradually moving to those territories that is controlled by russia because the ukrainian armed forces will liberate the crimean peninsula, but there are already other mainland parts of russia like bryantsi and spskov - this is a territory that permanently belongs to russia or is it correct to say so let's be honest

let's imagine a completely de-occupied ukraine , what will russia do if it has the ability to carry out strikes, it will attack and burn burn ukrainian cities liberated burn including the same sevastopol and so on yes there are different cities that will be liberated on this topic very detailed i cannot but say here that we wrote the material together with academician volodymyr gorbulin and it was published this morning on e-e on the website of ukrinform, the ukrainian state information agency, there very it is written in detail about how russia will act and what we should do for, so to speak, in quotation marks of a military confrontation, well, post-war conditionally , because we believe that our plan, so to speak, at least for victory is de-occupation and the organization of a further post-war confrontation, what am i

saying that i uh by the word post-war confrontation, we understand that it is to ensure that it is not possible to attack the ukrainian territories as much as possible, what is needed for this, for this we need to provide a mirror response, yes, on the one hand, we will have more powerful air defense and we will to cover more than russia at the expense of our western partners more than russia to cover important objects on the other hand we must have such a potential i say several thousand rockets this is a very interesting topic it's just that unfortunately we don't have much time i would like to be with you what still focus on those attacks that were on the territory of russia. what do you think, why are drones flying so actively in gdansk , there is such an unprotected air defense system there ? is it possible there, i don't know , there are a large number of military facilities there, tv towers which can be attacked, which can be considered military targets, now we have to ask the question not quite like that, why exactly in

bryansk they felt a weak spot and they will continue to attack there until this place remains weak, as we remember, chornobayivka has been killed 20 times so far there was a weak point, but it is very important that russia is a very big country and there are many such important objects for us, so they will transfer something to bryansk, they will defend bryansk there , the vectors of attacks will transfer to other airfields and to other objects, that's where the power lies ukrainian, but there is, of course, a certain weakness related to the fact that we are still only on the way to creating analogues of shaheeds and creating such powerful drones that will have a load of more than 70 kg of explosives - this is one - these are prokillers and the second point - this must be

done very quickly drones of operational-tactical operational-strategic level reconnaissance strike which will strike many times and by the way the complex of e-e guided weapons in ukraine has already been created and it was created in 2017. tests of it are identical for helicopters mi-8 and 24 and for drones, which can be made with such intelligence and outstanding systems , which, by the way, are more powerful than bayraktars. and, by the way , we can also launch baykar mahina, which is already being built in ukraine, and the turkish one is being made, and there are thoughts that it will be very convenient for ukraine, even not america, which gray eagle is there to ask, but brothers and jointly produce such drones of the a level, which can carry cruise missiles, and in the future, such as kizolma , the plane is actually unmanned, which is turkey, and

both of these drones work with ukrainian engines if ukraine puts its weapons complex there, and it is more powerful than the turkish one on the bayraktars. by the way , valentine, oh, maybe to the shield literally. i know that you can talk a lot on this topic, even literally. there is an interesting nuance: public figures close to the kremlin, in particular the same solovyov started talking yesterday about the fact that popskov wires could be launched from the baltic countries from this territory. how do you evaluate such statements and why are they trying to blame the baltic countries themselves for the fact that they could launch drones from there, this is all aimed at the russian audience in order to prove in practice that russia is fighting for its own, so to speak, taking survival for freedom, fighting with nato, which is attacking and 50 countries are waging war against russia, this is

rhetoric, it is very simple but the russian society is so degraded now that you can say anything and e. everyone there will chew on it and e-e all this will be taken as the basis of the main idea to raise the motivation of the russians e-e for this war e. they are doing it, well, to a certain extent, quite effectively, but not so much at the expense of these statements as at the expense of more rigid approaches to serving summonses and mobilization there, everything is already done electronically and they are used as a means of pressure in the event that there is no reaction to electronic messages there, now this is a very tough issue and to refuse is done so that the russian well, there is simply no way to refuse mobilization because otherwise there will be such sanctions against him and against his family that it will simply be even more difficult for him than, for example, to go to war and at least

ensure that the family somehow survives there one and a half minutes two questions from the territory of samoobkov could launch these drones those who are not supporters of the putin regime conditionally subversive groups eh theoretically well , this morning i saw a report that again russian volunteers of the russian volunteer corps entered and attacked the kursk birthplace yes and quite it is possible it is quite possible that they are growing dissatisfied and if it is confirmed well, it is confirmed but again now there is some information, an insinuation that it seems that the handsome man may not have been killed, but in any case, in any case, this is the case, this is the story of adapted and with wagner, it will play into the cons for putin, although he seems to have restored his power and demonstrated that he is standing firm, but within russia, there will be

more negative reactions, and it is expected that there will be subversive actions on the part of the russians themselves. i think we should expect this, this is the basis, the question is how willing they will be to do it en masse. yes, en masse is still more difficult. and in conclusion, briefly about crimea, the occupation authorities state that one cruise missile was allegedly shot down that flew at the territory of crimea, where could this missile fly, do you think it could really fly to attack the airfield and, um, can the russian federation now protect the peninsula ? i mean , the air in general cannot protect in general. that the cruise missile was shot down . it's okay. it's going on. testing the newest missile directly in combat conditions is very normal. we know that now missiles are being created with a range of 500 km. ukrainian

, they will be. i once again said many times that there is i am personally confident that by the end of the year there will be such missiles , and it is very important for me that there is political will and serious efforts to establish production so that it is not a single missile, and that it is several thousand missiles over the course of several months. then it will be very powerful power so cruise missiles russia can shoot down e in general in general yes, but if there will be a hall of them there, relatively speaking, for 20-30 years , then e, they will hit objects very, very densely, very normally that 70% russia destroys naval drones, but the 30 that remain, they cause such damage that russia does not succeed there, and this is very normal. that ukraine has actually started

to integrate its defense potential, its defense-industrial complex, into the development of defense potential, and this is the way long time for such a long victory and ensuring the destruction of the russian defense potential, this is very important , so we need to continue and increase the scale, as they say in our country now, and this is a very right way, thank you very much, valentin, for that joined our conversation valentin laborer, military analyst, director of the organization, center for studies of the army , conversion and disarmament, a guest of our broadcast, this is the freedom of the morning . frank insults, published videos from the chest cameras of policemen in dnipro shed even more light on the scandalous incident david shot a policeman

, a man died. what should be understood from these videos or divides according to the instructions of the patrolmen. why is aggression in the age of law enforcement officers unacceptable? we will sort out all the details with a lawyer. each of our likes in this video is a plus, like a treasure trove of high-quality ukrainian-language youtube, and i also see in the comments that a discussion has erupted about the events that took place in the dnipro. you can write your opinion, what questions do you have for the experts, this is important. in this way , our communication will be constant and live . new details of the incident with the participation of the police in dnipro, a woman who was in a stopped police car in dnipro is preparing a suspect, the following information was received from sources in the law enforcement agencies: the journalists of the radio freedom scheme project, the probable suspect will be announced under article 348 of the criminal code, this is an attack on the life of a law enforcement officer, the sanction of this article , by the way, provides from 9 years of imprisonment to life imprisonment, the radio scheme project svoboda received an extended video from the body cameras

of the patrol where you can hear the entire dialogue of the policemen with the passengers of the car in dnipro from the stop of the car to the shots, the video shows that the man got out of the car on his own and conflicted with the police officers, insulting them in my car, the woman continued to harass the patrolmen and after warning that he could be detained. and he told his female companions to back up and leave the place of detention - this is heard on the video, after ignoring the policemen's demands and a verbal conflict, the law enforcement officers began to drag the woman out from the driver's seat, there are also two minor children of the deceased in the car, they filmed the events on the instructions of adults, all my leg

, the prosecutor general's office commented on these events as follows the driver and passengers refused the request to get out of the car, the law enforcement officers began to forcefully pull them out of the car and used a gas canister, further judging by the video, the man got out of the car and attacked the law enforcement officers, knocking one down and hitting the other several times in the face , judging by what can be seen in the footage from body camera and video filmed by children in the car , the police used a firearm against the attacker, the driver died of his injuries on the spot, according to the scheme sources, the deceased had repeatedly violated traffic rules from 2018 to 2022. 12 protocols were drawn up for various violations. in addition, the bbc and ukranian pravda, the source of the law enforcement agencies , received information that during the incident, the victim had about two 48 ppm alcohol in his blood, which roughly corresponds to a bottle of vodka. i will remind you that on august 29 , a police patrol in dnipro stopped a car violated traffic rules

, the video surveillance camera recorded both the offense itself and the fact that a man was behind the wheel , however, after the stop, his companion was found to be driving the investigation of police officers absent from the performance of duties, and the proceedings against law enforcement officers were opened under the articles of murder and abuse of official authority in the state bureau of investigations, they said that in the near future the policeman who shot will be given a preventive measure, this is a topic that is very actively discussed by ukrainian society, if you are an active user of social networks, in particular but they could read dozens of publications and hundreds of comments about who ruled in this situation, a large part of those who write their opinions defend the law enforcement officers and take sides to the police, a large part of those who comment on this situation say, on the contrary, that the police had no right to shoot, many of them have different opinions , it must be said that only the court and the ukrainian investigation , which began its own investigation of this case, can make its verdict in this case, the proceedings are open under two articles , this is an abuse of official powers also

a murder, in addition to what our colleagues from the scheme project report, the law enforcement officers are also preparing, as i said, charges against the woman who was sitting in the car for what she could encroach on the safety and life of a law enforcement officer, we will also discuss this topic on our broadcast. but i see that the discussion is very active, it is very hot in the comments , so you still have time to write and express your opinion about what you think what really happened in dnipro who is guilty and who is not guilty maybe you had some similar incidents with law enforcement officers or you know the stories of people who also faced something similar how these stories ended is actually very important to say that the case is handled by the dbr under the control of the regional prosecutor's office, but we have the opportunity to constantly monitor this story

and, in particular, to talk about it on this broadcast if you have the desire to like this video, you can like the broadcast now, in addition, i invite you to subscribe to the youtube channel of radio svoboda if you they haven't done it yet. as you can see, we have a lot of exclusive data, including oleksiy baghanets, a lawyer, deputy prosecutor general of ukraine in 14-15 years , deputy chairman of the union of lawyers of ukraine , join our broadcast by phone oleksiy, i congratulate you. thank you for joining. from the videos you saw, there is information that you possess. perhaps you know more data than we do, whether there were violations of the instructions by the police . you understand, i see the situation. which woman is his wife or his common-law wife there is unknown. and this is one side and the other side is the actions of the police, that is, when i heard about it today

because there were different opinions on this matter when i heard today the information that something like registered criminal proceedings against this woman who is behind the wheel of this car, i believe that the decision of the law enforcement officers is correct. there was clearly a criminal offense . please tell me, please, relate to the policemen, congratulations, too. why? because the law on the national police directly lays out the grounds when

a policeman has the right to use a firearm , the law says that such cases must be exceptional and whether they are exceptional cases, we will explain the articles 42 of the law on the national police. they comment on it, then i think this is not a case where firearms should be used . first, and secondly, you must understand that the law says that even when there is an exceptional case , the actions of the policeman must be first of all, before using a firearm , to warn the offender to stop the illegal behavior and that if he does not stop, he will use a firearm, was there something that i did not see here that warned the police that they will use firearms , the points must also be taken into account that the policeman

, even in such a case, he must use a firearm in order to stop the illegal illegal actions of a person, but only to the extent that these actions are sufficient for such illegal activity the behavior of a criminal or an offender to be stopped, that is, when it comes to the fact that the victim in this situation suffered three gunshot wounds, whether in the back or in the area, or there is different information, i think that, at least, it exceeds the official powers and an employee of the national police , he should have shot into the air first, or should i not have, and in the ukrainian legislation , there is a warning rule, but it is said that he can use a firearm if he does not

stop his illegal actions. tell me either please, if you look at these shots again, at least from what can be evaluated from the outside, i have experts, in particular, they are not lawyers, they are not , uh, forensic experts, in order to do this , to conduct an examination if there was an attack on a policewoman, that is, a colleague of this police officer was attacked after several blows, a physical fight may have broken out between the policeman and the man who was driving, and the policeman understood that the situation was getting out of control, he had no way to influence it in any other way than to use a firearm in order to stop it, as you yourself said before that well, legally , i may not formulate it, but it is an offense in such cases, a weapon can be used. stop the offense filing the offense committed by this person i.e. a shot in the road you understand and who determines who

measure who determines this measure sauna and it is clearly stated in the law that he must act precisely in within the limits of the powers that the law gives us. i believe that in that situation he exceeded his powers. there was no need to inflict three gunshot wounds on the person who committed the offense. and were certain violations committed by the man and the woman who was sitting behind the wheel? from the video that we see these insults towards the policemen, talking in raised tones, tones of using censored swear words, i don't know, there are attempts to somehow provoke the police, but you saw it, i saw that the behavior was at least at least this man, who is really brazen in this situation, he had no right to behave in a situation with regard to police officers who were in the performance of their

official powers, and even more so when he used violence against them, he committed a criminal offense that is provided for there or because you said there 300 e-e 48th there or another article there or i will remove the resistance, it is possible to speak to a police officer about the use of our sister, obstructing a police officer from performing his official duties, that is, is he not a crime? unequivocally, the policeman had the right to stop and stop these illegal actions of his. but again, only to this extent, which was enough for these actions to be stopped and not shoot. excuse me with three shots in order to kill a specific person . how do you think this case can end in court? well, i this is my position. i don't know all the materials of the criminal proceedings. again, i clarify that i proceed from what i saw

on the tv screen, and it seems that these were video recordings of the policeman's uniform . but again, there were two policemen there. so two devices should have been working. well, i don’t know if the colleagues of the radiochem project are showing from both - this is a project of radio svoboda , they published extended footage of 8 minutes - it is from two video cameras, so you can watch it additionally, but still in such cases. what do you think if these two are violated articles are criminal proceedings if there is conditional evidence. how do you see it, which indicates that the law enforcement officer should not have used the weapon to the full extent, as he did, how can this case end? well i believe that it should be if the guilt of this policeman during the pre-trial investigation was proven and will be proven in full , he should be punished to the extent of his guilt, again, did he commit a completed crime or did he exceed his powers, that

's another matter there we are talking about registering a criminal proceeding, yes, i understood that due to the fact of exceeding official powers , also yes. in conclusion, one more question. what do you think if the parliament previously, for example , legalized the use of non-lethal weapons by the police means of stopping crimes. for the example of stun guns, it would be possible to avoid similar incidents like the one that took place in dnipro . well, you understand, i will not talk about stun guns today. i'm just saying that in addition to the use of firearms, the police have a whole arsenal that can beat a policeman to death, for example well, what kind of joke is he then, what kind of bull is he, what else is he there , what else can he apply if the conditional sentence is entered ? yes, i told you that it was possible not to use force on him, you

understand. was used against a police officer well, it was only then that the circumstances began to develop further, either when they began to pull this woman or this girl out of cars, yes, that is, there was a whole arsenal of police officers and it was not necessary to shoot to death in relation to this person of an armed attack. thank you, mr. oleksiy thank you i just have to say that the different opinions of lawyers on this matter, including those like you, just disagree with you oleksiy bagdanets, a lawyer as the deputy prosecutor general of ukraine, deputy chairman of the union of lawyers of ukraine, a guest of our broadcasts, again, we only need to say that the db is investigating this case, and therefore, according to the ukrainian investigation, the final point. in this story, as well as in court, you watched the broadcast freedom of the mornings. thank you for being with us. subscribe to our youtube channel. we will meet you on the air.

tomorrow you have peaceful and calm days , ten o'clock is the time to find out what is happening in ukraine and the world at this time khrystyna parubiy is working in the studio , a 48-year-old man was injured as a result of the morning shelling of the village of borova in the kharkiv region the regional military administration reported yesterday that the russians were preparing for vovchan damage two private houses, farm buildings, four garages and cars, the enemy also hit the village with a guided aerial bomb, a formation from the sumy district there along the old power line and a gas pipe, they say, they went to the second and saw the russians continue to terrorize zaporizhzhya region of the past day, the occupiers shelled the region with artillery 89 times