[000:00:00;00] the policy has clearly completely spoiled life, spoiled the opportunities of this person, that is, the powerful luxurious life that they lived for the last decade, starting from the 90s, that is, they now can’t do anything, they can’t go to europe , they can’t go there. they can study their children already and be treated in european clinics. well, that is , it simply spoiled and changed the quality of life, and the quality of life is then constantly under stress. and it is necessary to constantly prove to our putin and other scumbags like medvedev that they are ready to put their lives behind this insane regime that is not ready to give their children to the war . they are just really stressing these people who are used to living

comfortably . let's return to the comfort that was. let's be specific . and celyuzia, who is the highest bureaucracy, you are called the names of several people who have already lost their minds. and that’s what they did then . just who remained the heads, but the oligarchs , and they. they all ran away. who didn’t want to lose their minds? who are these people? where are these wonderful people? so tell the insect. the answer to this question is meshu. ustym is the head of the list of putin’s ministers, especially the economic bloc. this is the head of the baka nabyulina center. this is the mayor of moscow, sapernet, and many other governors. this is absolutely, oh, absolutely, the russian oligarchs, here you will read what pereska writes in his telegram channel, he just started the war himself, it’s just that we are not akalyny, some kind

of pathological hope, just how to make him suffer like a man who got lost in the desert, he urgently needs a drink of water and he dreams in some contract, some agreement, and the u.s. will normalize relations with countries, etc. vopros and what then usually happens collective leadership conditionally became a client even after the death of paul, the first parish, alexander, er, his son, when spiransky was there, some group of comrades, they played time, yes, they went very quickly , but then they went to themselves, but in the beginning, they were there exactly, and they also became the number of the collective leadership has disappeared. that is, if putin leaves

, it seems that there is also some kind of collective leadership. i think that i absolutely join now, the interests of ukraine are on the side, not us. for example, i don't think that putin's execution will lead to some such-and-such democracy in russia . happy russia in the future led to some kind of prosperous something. there was a free russia. there will be a war , not a corner forced to end the war against ukraine and the opposition of the western world the end of the war and their business, they are all businessmen in the future development will prosper, you probably know. yes, when what kind of disaster happens to gazprom, and in gazprom , the interests of putin's elite sit very strongly, the same thing happens with other pain

brothers of business in russia. so how will they strive to come to an agreement with the west and without eh , it's not a concession, but without a full refusal . that's the pensionist course, which means leaving ukraine and paying reparations to ukraine. maybe, without it, people will not be noncrats and will have to change their own well-being in them. let's put it this way, they will be forced to change their own. from berlin, he was with us. thank you very much , igor. now i have written here that there is a conversation between heathers and ports. what kind of conversation ? please tell me why you call the parishioner

an ambiguous person, and the result unequivocally not unequivocally well, i can, i can tell you how much, don’t tell me whether he is a bandit or not, otherwise we keep silent and everyone in russia switches to the russian language for one word , sullen bandits, everyone except him is very like that well, they are not them, and no novel will be written about them you know, they won't give you money for your face, you can't sell it yes, and i imagine a person who catches more than me, well, less than you , of course, who would decide, i will really give you a slur, which is clear, no, no, these guys are not suitable, the most vivid roman

it is possible to write about prigozhin and that is just the truth . he did not prove it, he may not have wanted to prove it, but he is a bright person under all conditions and he was happy if there was no russian-ukrainian war and if a ukrainian were between chile and ecuador somewhere in the region of peru, then we would be sitting and laughing morning till night it's just humorous the film would be if we didn't touch our people don't kill this scumbag but it's real these- well, just watch if you 're an independent expert somewhere on mars or on the moon it's just an interesting person and a prison and a restaurateur and that and in africa and in syria and in ukraine and the plane was shot down and putin says oh-oh-oh he knew him for many years and he didn't say that he just met him and he just fed him and already he knew it, these are completely different approaches, that is, i think that this is

a scientific page that will be one way or another a certain gabriel garcía márquez once described a future e-e writer, plus the fact that the doorman was just the frontman of this entire op-company and its real leader and the one with whom he did all this because dmytro utkin. by the way, a person who was born in ukraine is such an absolutely classic scoundrel with a face scoundrel and you say the difference is that he absolutely has a beautiful face, he should just be in the theater, i think if he had not been killed, he would have been hired in this uh, in future bond films as absolute evil and where there is no need to explain who is what, what are his thoughts and they just showed a person and that's it, it's funny enough, there is a topic that is being thrown at us, as mikhal zayat gorbachev said , and i would like to tell just briefly, i will try

to do it, how important it is to have comprehensive information, this is the story of when the police killed a person in the dnipro who violated the rules of the road means traffic, and it was as if she was drunk, i don't know if she was breaking the rules or if she was drunk, but when i heard that, i immediately sided with the police because martial law is actually in ukraine because you can't violate it because because because that is, there are many reasons when i looked at how it was filmed relatives or children of this murdered man, i immediately took the side of his relatives and everyone who was in the car, then i watched the footage that the police took and i now have a draw in my head in favor of the boy who was killed, because when we constantly podcreot, i just put it on the table as i have no opinion, but when they write to me, when we see it and it

is officially confirmed, i shot without warning in the back, it is not possible under all conditions to shoot traffic violators in the back without warning, i think something like that well i a small specialist in the legal practice of the united states, but in the states it seems to me that everything is very simple there already 90% would be on the side of this victim because they have shots when he approaches you aggressively or with a weapon, do you defend yourself or surround it and when he is from you runs and hits your partner at the same time. no, he didn't hit his partner when he was running. he beat his partner before that . that is, the question is, are you the school

of the ukrainian policemen? explain citizens, we have training on wednesdays and fridays. we have e-e documents on how to behave in such a case. wider than the documents but then society will at least understand what happens when society does not know whether the police are taught where or not new people who are hired to the national police go through this procedure. without this procedure , you cannot join the national police. everyone knows this. mykol, this is nothing new, because this is the reform of the patrol police. you go in once and you were trained for three months, and then for ten years you

you don't continue your studies, so that's the way it is all the time , it's about the fact that when they celebrated and then it goes well, there is a supreme in this, i'm waiting well, it's strange that you don't know because the whole essence of the reform of the national police was that this national politicians know, i was a member of the commission for the election of the head of the national police, i don't know either. we ukrainians today have not been and do not know where those classes are, where the police sit, where the teachers say, who the teachers are, and so on. again, this is not true because when there were reforms of the national police policy, it was reported on all loudspeakers and 40 million ukrainians could inquire about it, although it seems to me that one does not need to be a representative of forty million to understand that an attack on a policeman is not at all the same as a situation with a violation of the street law, we saw an ordinary bandit attack on a policeman, we saw him during martial law in the country, martial law, now a person

is attacking now, yes, he would just pull a person out of a car, an attack, now an attack, and now a policeman is running away from him, he is a citizen he shoots him, i absolutely do not justify shooting at a person who cannot defend himself, but i am absolutely sure that only after the citizens of ukraine themselves , he did not pull out the citizen. the drunk driver, at the same time, there were insults, at the same time, there was a refusal to get out of the car, this is necessary, at the same time, in the situation , law enforcement agencies have the right to react to the actions of people who violate public order during martial law, and this reaction must be quick and tough, therefore what kind of person, what kind of person, what strength is behind the wheel, drunk driving can kill your child, so let 's do it. well, everything is the task of the police to stop a drunk driver, and i need rules,

i don't need to pay, that is, he opens the door and just this person to leave no no wait wait and if a person does not want to leave he has the right to grab him and pull him out according to the rules this is my only question so the same question is also how it happened now there should be a trial if we see it no no need translated court, we started discussing it without a trial, now we started without a trial, and i believe that someone can explain to me, the police have the right to extract by using physical force, but the question is again, you continue to manipulate these people , you wanted to leave the crime scene. i didn't see them the police were leaving, well, no, it is also on the footage that was with the police , i did not see them move. i see that they came to the door , opened it and began to pull the man out with force. i saw when they

did that, was the man drunk or not he is not drunk, i don't know, he started to defend his wife, his lover, a neighbor, i don't know, he started to defend now, he is asking, and there is a sign, which they say he violated, we don't see the sign, two lanes are allowed, it is allowed to turn left, it is not possible at all, no, wait, if you are stopped the police if you drive a car while drunk, what's the difference what you are doing is being violated, it is being violated , she does not know whether you are drunk or sober, there is no need to manipulate here either, no one knows from a distance and cannot apply the device to the relationship, nor can it be known, but in any - in any case, it is absolutely obvious that the driver stops at the reprimand of the law enforcement authorities

, the car was standing, a lot of questions are being asked. we saw him beat a policeman, this is an obvious point, if it wasn't possible to discuss anything and we saw from a non-dangerous criminal who beat a policeman in the united states, a person who beat a policeman and people who justified the person who killed a policeman were most likely brought to justice to the responsibility of those who resisted the policeman, the policemen killed such a person, then these people received 25 years in prison, i do not argue that because these people who were killed could no longer i was in prison then, they just found a prison for themselves in another place, and people who were not killed in this situation are not about america, we are about the dnipro, the dnipro is not the same everywhere . not at all the same i'm not talking about that i'm sorry especially in the american police there were many and what i have the same logic like you you just like to win with

a score of 10:0 and i like 50 to 50 so i see that i have questions i believe that a person who violates the rules of street traffic is not should we kill her or should we change one column of the criminal code and that's all those people say that a person who violates the rules of street traffic should definitely not be killed, it doesn't even seem like a topic for discussion that a person who violates the rules in order to violate the rules of street traffic should not be beaten to raise a hand to a police officer, this should be a rule, and what we don't see is a police officer . by the way, we should find out somehow, he has the right to beat and use force and use gas, the police officer has the right, that's all the people who are here now we see what this person and this girl, who i mean in a police uniform, and this, too , this, this, this, this

, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, how it is happening now, this person and this girl, who i mean, have the right to do, can, i don't mind, can fix it, but i'm asking for rights there shouldn't be everything, there are two filmings, there are filmings of the police , there is a filming of the people who were in the car, it is obvious that the filming of the people who were in the car when she was shouting at the children is being shot from you shoot it shoot it was actually still a story when she wanted precisely so that such a shooting was manipulative when the child screamed, i now for her request, the nurses heard about the policeman on their own shooting and it could actually be characterized as two gangs. how do you imagine that the violators were afraid that this was a gang, i would have understood, i was wrong, and the person who says shoot is a gang member. what kind of person is working, what kind of child is screaming , and now i'm going to talk about the policewoman, what does it look like, and here's a traffic violation , mykola, with the fact that the child is also

the child, that she can say anything and for some reason, she is not subject to criminal prosecution. no one is much. well, yes, his father was killed , nothing was done to me, the congress did nothing to me, just father in the back three times three times stre father in the back three times that's right once i twice right we once warned now we were under under investigation for the fact that she abetted the murder of a police officer if she is a minor she can she can end up in a colony for juvenile delinquents there such situations if she is subject to this story if they were traveling in sweden nothing would have happened if if the child was an adult. if he hadn't been drinking while driving . what we don't know. if they

had behaved like that. traffic and we don't know there was a violation and if there was no violation if you were not a violation you can beat a police officer officer what a police officer is hitting me i will have to answer i hope why when what if you kill a police officer and you you will not beat me, you will just sit behind bars for 3-4 years, it is accordingly criminal that according to ukrainian law, a policeman has the right to beat me and i do not have the right of the constitution to kill you if if he is a soldier yes of course well then what are you saying to me then if you offer me a prison, i want to put them in prison under any law, an attack on a police officer is punished more seriously than an attack on a civilian during lunch

. no one obeys a criminal order twice, ukrainians went to the maidan to disobey a criminal order oh policemen this is absolutely this is absolutely absolutely stupid because no one went out individuals did not go to the maidan not to get fucked people were just following the laws and the government was breaking the laws and yes yes no the government very beautifully, sometimes the majority of the parliament adopted laws about a bunch of prohibitions, and this is the 16th, i remember how now and then everyone ignored these laws, unjust laws are not enforced very often, at least in ukraine in in all civilized countries and in those countries that we want to join, an attack on a police officer in the performance of official duties is punishable by law and i am absolutely sure that you will go to prison in such a situation if you do not like the ratio of the police performing their duties i very simple methods complaint against a police

officer court case against a police officer we ordered i stop i stop it because when my wife will be hit on the head by the police and don't say that this doesn't happen i will write a complaint in a week well, of course, otherwise, you need to be fired, your wife needs to see you already in the grave, yes, the policeman has the right again we are out of money , i repeat, i repeat the policemen, if you constantly emphasize only one side of the case, that wow, i have no right to defend myself because i have to obey him mykola, we never took you, and if he violates the draft law , he must answer according to the law. and you have no right to beat him. perspective, but now it will not be transferred to the individual. no, this is a criticism of the position. moreover, i think that look at how you share more or part of the ukrainians who watch this tv, and i can calmly tell them that

they will share this position and they will remain between ukraine and russia in to this purgatory that is under missiles and drones for the rest of my life . a beautiful conclusion and this clear one was presented. of the ukrainian-russian war , and we who believe that it is necessary to defend the dignity of ourselves, the honor of our wives, our families , the russian-ukrainian war started because of us, and we will sit in the srat, as mr. port offers us , disrespect, disrespect to the state and this first step to god to a citizen is the first evil, this is the state for the citizen, not the citizen, for the citizens, this is the soviet union, long live the native country and there are no other citizens who do not respect the state and beat its representatives, who, in

principle, exist in order to really he maintained order and is turning the country into the bitch that mr. verest is talking about. i am all policemen now , god forbid, throw a dick at that policeman and you will get 10 years. in the united states, god forbid , throw a glass at a policeman and everything will be fine, if you are, if the glass is and they won't give you a fine yet. and if you raise your hand, they will give you a fine on the trade winds, the prison is close to ideal, suddenly , please, continue the program of eastern studies, we should think about it. i think igor was interesting to watch thank you that we definitely have us. we travel a lot now in ukraine and encounter both the military and the police, and to be honest, i have never once heard a bad word from them, if you

behave in this way in principle. well, okay , there are 40 million different cases that can be found and polite and impolite something seems so to me, but we are now all the same proyardogana proler reprimanded mr. igor so, the rydogan has to fight with putin in sochi for how long, in your opinion, is it mr. igor semen volos, director of the center for middle eastern studies i am already confused here testimony, to what extent is it an interest, a reprimand, how much do people say that erdoğan is putting pressure on putin, i sit and think well , he really has such and such a number of trump cards. so that it is for the grain agreement to continue as much as he needs it, really, yes, this is a good question. well, in principle

, there is no answer to them, and uh, right now, yes, yes , right now, titan makes such visits on a regular basis from kyiv to moscow and tries somehow derail this situation. because i understand it would be such a first important exam for him as for the new minister of foreign affairs, counting on the fact that a person who is familiar with former intelligence knows certain processes and procedures and accordingly can model this process quite effectively , let's see as of now it is obvious that the turkish diplomacy, the turkish leader , tried for a whole month to drag mr. putin to istanbul or ankara, and

the tactics were obvious, that is, putin will feel insecure on foreign territory and it is possible to offer him turkish er turkish hospitality and actually this is such an element that is possible for er to a point from the point of view of the same verton could play and putin has not received positive emotions for a long time and here er they offered emotions emotions but then refused such acceptance of such sunbathing and, as of now , sochi looks like a tactical advantage

- a victory for putin. i won't tell everyone yet, but most of his visits to sochi to putin ended in nothing, so the chances and that's why i say what no one will say about it, i can't say, the chances are uh, unclear. and what did he do in the end? is putin ready and does putin need this departure? it is clear that he needs it, but putin may not need it, but putin is satisfied with the project of meeting me, that is , there have been talks about the necessary meeting for several months, but if putin does not does he need to simply tick the box that he still communicates with some world leaders

and i don’t see any other option, you know, putin has nothing to lose, he can in principle and he is interested in telling the sertogans at least some signals that we are hearing now that what putin would like with without him, he talked about the impracticality of further economic military cooperation with ukraine, he would have said that ukraine would definitely lose and that ukraine should not be supported, that is, putin would continue to bend his line and not during the negotiations, he will tell erdoğan everything that we have heard many times, as blinkel said at one time . yes, when he met with lavrov and when he told him about russia, this is approximately possible . then we will take this story more broadly, in principle, the near eastern and

middle eastern countries of the world, they can somehow react to it if they are told the same fairy tale 25 times about great russia , propagandistic ukraine, about the necessity russia's victories and the need to break off all relations with ukraine well, if i were told the same thing 25 times, i would probably refuse to listen to how re-productive such conversations with the same leaders of the middle east can be for the seventh time. well, we are not talking about syria, there is a separate story there, but i don't know about other leaders , they will accept it, please, they will accept it, the problem is not that they are told about it many, many times, the problem is that they

they want to hear it themselves, they are anti-american, for them russia is an uh alternative, at least there will be some, and they, actually , this key problem of the global rooster is that for them the soviet union was uh, well, such a country that ensured a balance of interests and not made it possible for the americans as the world gendarme to act there , uh, anywhere and be, and they are very, very many of them, i won’t say all of them, but whites, part of the political class, intellectuals, and especially the street. they live in very, very difficult narratives, simple ideas, and this is about the fact that the united states collapsed the soviet union, this would have happened very badly , but ukraine was the initiator of the collapse

of the civil union, and therefore ukraine is