[000:00:00;00] there was corruption on the lands of the academy of sciences, the process of consolidation of all state-owned enterprises was finally launched so that we as a state could understand what we are selling and which national champions we are leaving no previous head of the state property fund was able to do this and it is also important that the process of liquidation of enterprises has finally moved from a standstill how we already know that we had a lot of such enterprises and they ate up a lot of state money , we can thank you, there really are no questions, we support you, thank you well

please. and you. there are no such questions. european solidarity of the aryans. and we have a question. mykola knyazhytskyi will ask it . thank you, dear mr. omerov. the question is in the last law as a profund, which we discussed with you and which we voted for as part of the powers . harmy was transferred to the state property fund. and it is possible for mr. rai to leave, ms. radinoy , so that you would listen to me at this moment. yes, i will be very grateful. yes, part of the powers were transferred to the state property fund. do you see the expediency of the existence of these in essence, now parallel structures why do we need arma, which is accused of corruption, where there are many claims of abuses, thank you while you were managing the fund, there were no such abuses, but why are we duplicating this work now ? thank you, thank you for the question . i planned to submit to the committee already at the beginning of this e-e month a-a in the new

state property policy it was proposed that there should be commercial objects, non-commercial objects, banks and defense objects for the future, very clearly spelled out clearly the future is written, the law on state property is for the future and it will be handed over to the fund in the coming weeks. regarding the other things that have been handed over so far, i believe that the instinctive ability is there now, it works, everyone works according to their mandates, they work vertically. we have four mandates, the first is privatization everyone knows that worldview is one of the directions, the second direction is the management of state assets, until now it was called the management of system rights, and sometimes it was not clear what a resource is, what is an asset, how to manage it, how to appoint it now we in the fund understand all this and i do not think that this is a big risk

. moreover, i will say that regarding duplication, if the verkhovna rada and the cabinet of ministers decide that the only e-e institution of the state asset management should be the fund. i think that it is appropriate , then you will make a decision and will you hand over these assets that are temporarily in the army under arrest in the state property fund thank you thank you and the last question, if you have time to ask dmitrieva oksana oleksandrivna, please , servant of the people , please put it in words.

ask a question minute by minute let me go thank you, and according to the regulations, he has two oleksandr sergeyevich oksana ivanovich , you really did a lot in this position before you , you really did not get involved in any corruption scandal, you understand where you plan to go and what you will have to do there and what will have to be raked out? sorry for the slang and should it be done? perhaps it is better to stay in the position that you have today and continue this important direction because you, uh, you managed to find a common language in working with the deputy corps and with internationalists and with the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, therefore, should i resign from this position and go to the position of minister of defense, realizing that it will be very difficult for you to contain the negativity and all the corruption scandals that are connected with this ministry today? thank you, please. i would like to thank you once again for the question

the first is mathematics. 82% of the enterprises we passed the law were sent to through the procedure. this is also privatization for liquidation. 13% of large privatizations were small. privatization of 4% is a land bank and 1% is a sovereign fund. that is, i fulfilled all the tasks set by the cabinet of ministers. that's why i'm in this plan. i tell her that i've prepared it and the sovereign fund, the land bank, that's why in this plan i'm now responsible for the sovereign fund, if the verkhovna rada votes tomorrow to give such an opportunity to work in the ministry of defense, i'll uh, have it as an honor, thank you, thank you, rostom inverovich the time has definitely run out dear colleagues , the chairman of the specialized committee on economic development , dmytro andriyovych natalukha, is invited to make a report, please thank

the colleagues of the e-e committee based on the results of the review , guided by the provisions of paragraph 12 of part of the first article 85 of the constitution of ukraine, decided to recommend in the verkhovna rada of ukraine to dismiss the deceased envero from the position of the head of the state property fund of ukraine, and i would like to note that such a recommendation, such a dismissal of the self-helpers of our conditions in our recent history, is something very special, because not all the heads of the state property fund left the state property fund with their own feet or at their own will, and here i would like to actually applaud roste manverovych for enduring this tension. i would like to point out that fact that it was a year of constructive work, without a doubt, a year of fruitful work , and i, as a person who clearly understands that minverovich is growing, has an understanding of strategic

enterprises of state enterprises and enterprises that, even under the condition of state ownership, are able to produce competitive high-quality products, i would like to wish for only one thing, regardless of where life is going, or this hall will throw you into the next position in the ministry. i would really like you to pay special attention in the context of this position to competitive participation state enterprises and state industry in the supply of defense forces. i am talking about import substitution. i am talking about supporting the national producer . the benefit of strengthening ukrainian industrial capacity this is my only wish and thank you for

your cooperation thank you two for two against write it down please please vasylchenko's voice please transfer dear colleagues, there is probably no other state body in which such a number of different not-so-reformist interests are concentrated as the state property fund of 1,200

enterprises that have always been a source , including political corruption and corruption scandals, and it is probably extraordinary that during the year of working as the head of the state property fund, which he headed mr. roste umerov, there was no corruption scandal, i don't remember a single head of any of these who came to us and within a year he adopted three laws that fundamentally changed the structure of his departments, including those where this department lost certain influences , but it was achieved in the public interest and growth, it made me very sad that our country is now losing such an effective head of the state property fund. i would really like to see growth prove

everything that he started, including sovereign the fund that has been talked about here for many decades but has never been done but there is a war in the country and the country needs a new defense minister and if i can say three things to prorostem they will be very simple this is one of the best negotiators of our country, this is one of the best businessmen, and we saw from the results of the fund, and the third most important thing is a person who values ​​his reputation more than anything else, and i am sure that, just as at the fund, the reputation of the ministry of defense is growing, he will confirm it, thank you, thank you, stepan ivanovich kubiv, a european simple word will pass the tracks to the princely as they say, please, thank you. you know we , european solidarity, as an opposition

faction, have never voted for those candidates from the government proposed by the majority, we did not vote this time, but watched this experiment carefully with sympathy because it was an example when a representative of the opposition was not from our faction but a representative of the opposition was appointed to a government position . of the people were present in our government, a colleague correctly said that we did not observe any corruption scandals, we all saw that rustem tried to reform the fund and in general he succeeded despite the fact that the representatives our faction also had a lot of complaints against him. because you cannot reform one institution in an inefficient government where

the system against the authorities does not work against you and where everything is managed from one office, even if you are an angel, even if you are a representative of the opposition, but merlu there is a lot what we are worried about now was successful, but he is now leaving when we voted for the law on the state property fund , maybe we were wrong, but we voted for it , hoping for the managerial experience of mr. omerov, who will head the fund now if people use this reformed law again who, following calls from the upper offices, using it, will begin to trample the earth, will begin to appoint deputies without control, there is a plus in this, but there is also a minus in this, when the parliament has no control over what is happening in the fund. then we will draw a conclusion. no. and to pomerov , who is now taking pictures, i wanted to appeal and ask him not to take

responsibility for what he started doing there, because you have to continue and bring it to the end, because it was ours too trust, too. thank you, the homeland of kabachenko, and arrows are one chance, yes. thank you, dear mr. chairman , in fact, just as in the case of the ministry of defense, the issue of the state property fund is an absolutely ideological issue that does not always correlate with the person who heads the specified institution here dear mr. chairman of the committee, representative the monomajority said that not everyone stepped forward, i want to remind you that two of those who stepped forward , relatively speaking, from this fund were appointed by you, your majority appointed these people who are now being sought all over the world by law enforcement agencies, so there is no need to flaunt one person, but remember everyone who was appointed, but the question is different

, in fact, it seemed to me that the war should have opened everyone's eyes to absolutely obvious , simple and understandable things, the first thing is the influence of the state on the economy. clearly understand in which sectors the state should retain decisive control, especially in those sectors that ensure the welfare of citizens; we remember the terrible events of the winter of last year, when the electricity was completely cut off from the russian shelling, it seemed to me that this was enough to change the government's policy of the state property fund, but again, we are all being directed to privatization during the war, there is no market during the war, there is no real real price objects, it is absolutely obvious that

you cannot sell objects at the real market price, instead, the state property fund must manage state property and not squander it , not sell off state property, however, general the policy is absolutely different, therefore, as if the chairman of the fund was not appointed , he will, unfortunately, carry out this false policy, therefore, thank you oleksandr serhiyevich, platform for life, peace, invite the deputies to the hall, please, thank you , dear chairman, dear colleagues, our group will definitely support the statement that he is dying, not resigning, he had many no one denies their positive results, this is related to the institutional or institutional reform of the state property fund. this is a really complex structure

, it is not only the central department with regional branches, there are also 2,368 entities of economic activity that were really in an extremely difficult condition, and therefore it is very important that when we vote on this resignation letter today, we got a new person who will at least continue the same policy and at most will settle the issues that there is another point that is very important, which we already started today in the discussion about before and i want to continue it now. 82% of enterprises out of 2368 enterprises are either at the stage of bankruptcy or in a deplorable state, all of them enterprises must go under the hammer for privatization, there are enterprises that must continue the policy of reform and still be in the public sector , therefore, from this point of view, it is necessary to strengthen and regulate the financial situation of these enterprises, and not let them all go under the hammer one more point - this is the third that must be submitted to the verkhovna rada. this is a list of strategic objects that are not subject to privatization. this work is carried out jointly with

the cabinet of ministers of ukraine. at the end of the 19th year, this list of strategic objects was canceled. objects and it would be logical for us to see it from one side and from the other. we have seen a specific list of enterprises that will actually be privatized. well, the last thing we would like to draw attention to is the fact that any policy of the state property fund is not only directed to privatization, and to the management of this property, and it must be effective, and i wish in the future and successors that they continue this work and cut this percentage from 82, at least to half. take your seats, please, in accordance with paragraph 12 of the first part of article 85 of the constitution of ukraine. i am putting to a vote for adoption as a whole the draft resolution under registration number 96 78 on the dismissal of roste

manverovych vmirova from the position of the head of the state property fund of ukraine. thank you for your work, and we have one more personnel issue , according to paragraph 12 of part one of article 85 of the constitution of ukraine, the powers of the verkhovna rada of ukraine include dismissal from the post of the head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine 5 in september 2023, the head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, olha stanislavivna pischanska, submitted a statement to the verkhovna rada of ukraine with a request to dismiss her and take up her position . the specialized committee on economic development considered the said statement, and with the consequences of the consideration, the people's

deputies of ukraine, the members of the committee submitted a draft resolution for consideration by the verkhovna rada of ukraine, respectively under registration number 10 000:1 relevant materials were provided to you at the conciliation council we agreed to discuss this issue under a shortened procedure with the provision words for a speech up to seven minutes by the head of the ukrainian support committee anton and answers to the questions of the people's deputies up to six minutes i propose to support this procedure i am putting the following proposal to a vote 150 votes are needed this procedural decision i ask you to vote for 302 decisions the maintenance procedure has been adopted let's proceed to consideration of the issue to words for the speech, the head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine, olha stanislavivna

pischanska, is invited, please until seven minutes . good afternoon, dear deputies. thank you for the the opportunity to speak when i first stood on this rostrum and they gave consent to my appointment 3 years ago i made certain commitments regarding the independence and effectiveness of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine to society and to you dear members of parliament, however, what about the fact that i will devote my efforts to the development fair competition, i will conduct a fair and objective investigation of violators of monopolists , conspirators during public procurement, i promised a transparent and effective committee , predictability and consistency

of the monopoly committee, a new level of international cooperation and the fulfillment of our european integration obligations, i will briefly report on the most high-profile cases for these three years, the committee will issue a decision against the dtek akhmetov group regarding the abuse of the monopoly position of dnipro nitrogen kolomiyskyi regarding the abuse of the monopoly position of interstarch poroshenko regarding the abuse of the monopoly position of interpipe pinchuk regarding conspiracies at teddy scoutman's public auction regarding non-fulfilment of the committee's decision as you can see, we did not divide the oligarchs into powerful or non-powerful from the point of view of the law, and for the benefit of competition, we did not stand aside and state monopolies, we fined ukrzalnytsya, opened cases against naftogaz now, and the investigation is at the final stage, and i am sure that my successors will make a decision on these cases in the near future, we followed the

authorities to make a decision against the ministry of infrastructure , gave recommendations i can do it there and on the pc during my tenure we faced a fuel crisis , the committee proposed a comprehensive solution, namely to return state control priceless relegation, namely state control over the circulation of fuel, became a serious challenge problems with payments on the electricity market, the committee itself has the idea to introduce financial guarantees not only with bank guarantees, but also with real money, and it is now working, this system is the greatest social achievement of ours and you, considers the adoption of the draft law 54- 31, which initiates major antimonopoly reforms and is a significant step on the way to the european union. we also reformed the territorial division

by reducing their number and at the same time by strengthening their efficiency, we implemented the reform of the public procurement appeals body, introduced the institute of the public institute of commissioners, now elected on a competitive basis , professionals exclusively take care of the review of complaints about public procurement, the number of which is calculated in the thousands per year, the speed and quality of the review of complaints, which we achieved thanks to this reform, are important in the context of the current trend to increase the transparency of public procurement we concluded a large roma memorandum on cooperation with competition agencies of nine countries thanks to this, central and eastern europe received new opportunities for cross-border cooperation in the field of protecting economic competition, and finally, i want to thank all of you, first of all, i want to thank the president of ukraine for the trust and the opportunity to contribute to the development of ukraine. i want to thank you, dear

deputies, for cooperation for the discussion that took place behind closed doors, all this led to certain results and that resulted in the voted bill, and i am sure that the reform has begun and it is not reversible either separately, i want to thank the team of the antonopol committee for being there all this time, for their professionalism , for their unceasing effort to do their job as best as possible and the available time. thank you. thank you. questions to the main and

monopoly committee from the seat of oleksiy oleksiy goncharenko please european solidarity so now cheerfully reported about the fact that you kolomoi fine just forgot one thing that and when this it was about 4.7 billion about gas stations, and then everything, all the decisions were completely canceled and broken in the courts, and that 's why i'm interested to hear not exactly the specifics, but how much i paid as a result kolomoiskyi paid the fines to his company. well, it can also clarify the situation. there was a lot of talk about the fact that your sister was involved

in the fact that she had a villa of the zelensky couple in italy . please tell me more about it. thank you for the question concerns a-a decisions on kolomoiskyi the first one noted the decision on dnipro nitrogen on the abuse of a monopoly position, the decision is currently in the courts, the zander is being considered and it has not been canceled . also there are no final decisions yet and they are all being considered in the courts , so it is too early to say about any conclusion separately that i want to draw attention to the fact that for six years the committee fought for a decision on this case involuntarily

because this company, the whole family, by means of methods, contributed to the stopping of the committee's proceedings, and despite everything, the committee made a decision, and i am currently defending it in the courts, what concerns my sister's company, i suggest that you ask my sister's questions because during her work there i did not formalize the monopoly committee no companies i did not call anyone to do anything i thank you thank you please european solidarity velichkovych mykola romanovych please pass the floor to oleksiy goncharenko oleksiy goncharenko thank you oleksiy goncharenko first of all i know that even though i saw you i i want to remind you that the law on the antimonopoly committee requires your regular reports in the parliament. and this is the first time i see you. it seems to me that after the appointment. therefore, the first question is why you did not report as required by the law. question number two is that the growth of road cartels is

a question that worries many about the big construction, fraud, and who and how it was carried out, where was the reaction, where was the result, what were the achievements in the investigation of the distortions of the auction results, reznikov’s jacket, who just left here, the truth without a jacket, and that questions and other questions, this is yours and the last question is about the intention to raise salaries and bonuses, you said that the reform law is important, if the entire reform of the antimonopoly committee is to raise your salaries and bonuses at a time when we are told that there is no money for non- military personnel, do you seriously think that this is a reform, please, thank you for your question, first of all, mr. goncharenko , we have met with you, i have seen you several times . i also want to note that during my term of office, i had many meetings with deputies

, and i did not refuse a meeting with any deputy when there were proposals or a desire to meet to discuss any issues regarding the e-e investigation of collusion cases at tenders, this work is conducted regularly , more than 300 decisions are made annually on cases both by the central office of the antimonopoly committee and by territorial branches, and i want to draw your attention that we have high-profile decisions and not only on road e-e cartels , but also on any issues at auctions and on food products, until the e-e e-e system was closed, these decisions were made transparently with fines of more than 400 million in connection with conspiracies for the purchase of food for the ministry of defense, etc. you can look at the list on the website of which

business entities we made decisions on with the languages ​​in the auction, thank you, please voice roman kostenko zheleznya user, please pass it on to zheleznyak, please zheleznyak , please, maybe maybe from here the words have already run out, not transferred yaroslava ivanych second attempt and she is happy mrs. olga i have three short, concise questions for you and please give a short and clear answer, first, what is the reason that you