[000:00:00;00] thank you, please voice roman kostenko zheleznya user please pass it on to zheleznyak please zheleznyak please did not pass the word was not passed yaroslava ivanych second attempt and she is happy mrs. olga i have three short and concise questions for you and i ask you to give short and clear answers as well, first which one the reason for the fact that you are leaving

the position of the head of the antimonopoly committee after the results announced by you. should we expect your candidacy as the future head of the state property fund, thank you regarding the reason why questions were asked today and regarding the salary increase in the reform of the antimonopoly committee with hints natasha, this is being done for me and uh regarding how uh my sister forms some companies so, i want to point out to you that i came to the antimonopoly committee and, as i promised, in order to create a transparent body, to create conditions for people to work as efficiently as possible for the benefit of the state and for the development of competition, and

accordingly, all this responsibility is laid out in the law for three years, as i voted, the committee became the most transparent than it had been in the previous 29 years, and as in the development process of any organization, at each stage , a leader of a different format is needed, so i fulfilled my function, i endured, i received the committee, we developed it together we voted for the reform together with you, for which i sincerely thank you, therefore i believe that it is time for me to make room for people who, with these tools, will in the future improve the work of the committee and give results, i thank you for what concerns of the proposed position, i personally have my own rules for life until i complete

my new and existing ones. i do not discuss and do not share my plans and intentions, so i will not comment and discuss these steps for now. thank you. thank you. you can sit down and please write it down. for two against excuse me dmytro andriyovych, of course i sincerely apologize to our super-respectable committee and its chairman is invited to speak committee on economic development please for a joint report thank you dear oleksandra serhiyovych thank you dear olga stanislavivna especially for the last answer regarding your personal motivation, i personally believe that it is worthy and very noble, i really thank my colleagues for the results of the review, the committee on economic development, guided by the provisions of paragraph 12 of the first part of article 85

of the constitution of ukraine, made a decision to recommend to the verkhovna rada of ukraine to dismiss olya stanislavna pischansky from the position of head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine this decision was not unanimous which were not unanimous decisions in the committee under the time of consideration of some or other issues related to the subject of competition law, but this is normal and natural because the very specificity of competition legislation is that there is a conflict between business and the regulator that is laid down from the very beginning, the conflict is absolutely constructive , and that is why the deputies who are here from the regions and they have a lot of business in their districts, quite expectedly, they often defended the position of those businesses that are represented in them, but the vote is not unanimous in favor of resignation, it says something else about the conflict within

of each of the deputies in making decisions on whether to let olga stanislavivna go free, let's say yes, and this decision was very difficult , because during this time we really became convinced of her systematicity, her professionalism in how constructively she knows how to work with different factions with different arguments and with various partners and stakeholders, and therefore despite the fact that of course we have no right to deny you this decision , it was not easy for us and we hope

to cross paths with you to work side by side on professional path, thank you, thank you, write it down, please, two for two against, please, servant of the people, what is the point, hello, yes, i want to thank you for the work done and wish you success in the following positions, thank you, please , ariv, e. solidarity, dear friends, we are currently considering the resignation of the head of the antimonopoly committee, well, it is clear that we have to vote for it, because, unfortunately, there was no work in the verkhovna rada, no reports , and we do not see any real results in the economy the country monopolizes the further the more and there are no real

problems with monopolists, then we already see monopoly in general in the country on everything look at us the president's office is installed on the field at the local government this morning searches of the acting chairman of the chernihiv city council suspended mayor of rivne attack on everything local self-government is all here. monopoly, we see it with you, friends. even monopoly , our colleagues want to install it here, even for call centers, but uh, mykola constant tyshchenko is in the hall, i hope that he will take after i would really like to hear this reply. so how does he investigate the issue of e call centers, what kind of tapes and how did we hear all the constants here and there, the prague restaurant. everything else, we see monopoly everywhere. and what was the antimonopoly committee doing at that time, a very good question. the antimonopoly committee tells us we were preparing a reform in the form of a new law, and the new law provides for an increase

in money for social and household issues of members of the antimonopoly committee, and an increase in money and salaries for the management of the antimonopoly committee. well, this is a real reform at the moment when we don't have enough money for military personnel, as they tell us. no, return the thirty, our conscripts still receive a pitiful 500, or the wounded 600-700 uah per month. the end of the era of cumanism, shame, please, homeland kucherenko oleksiyovich oleksiy kucherenko homeland dear colleagues, anyone with any sense and adequacy understands that

the system of public administration in ukraine in fact does not exist and this is formalized in the fact that they are lost. practically all institutions are not independent entities and in this situation when we are discussing the work of the head of the antimonopoly committee well, we can also discuss some work of the ncrep independently of other institutions so that we all understand the cabinet that they long ago lost their subjectivity and they turned into branches or management or departments of the decision-making center located at a well-known address on the street of the bank for four years of the existence of your powerful authorities well, thank god, you all realized when you took a selfie with your ids that there is no one to translate anymore. in front of those who pass, foreigners also do not pass and the pope no longer passes. these are the real results of your work. well, let's analyze three years of them, mrs. olga pischanska, i sympathize with her

indeed, she met with deputies , i can definitely say that pleasant meetings are such, well, friendly coffee, the result is usually no complaints against her. well, i even find it funny in this situation, because he himself is leaving this position testifies today that the institution as such has not taken place and i cannot understand well, if you have prepared a reform together with your colleagues if you want what am i to embody why are you entering on your own initiative that's why i and we will be tomorrow we will probably discuss her successor ms. olga thank you but believe me, in the fight against monopolies, for today , unfortunately, monopolies are winning. this is my conclusion

. thank you, please. ukrainians, mr. chairman and ms. olha olha stanislavivna said that she considers the adoption of law 54-31 on improving the work of the antimonopoly committee to be her greatest achievement. indeed, this is one of the seven criteria for us to start negotiations on joining the eu, but what happened in this the draft law by the hands of some people's deputies because the government forbade the antimonopoly committee, the tax committee , etc. as the government forbade, they introduced an amendment to escape under the influence of this law, in no country in europe have they seen such a case that the ecoinspection, which was also carried

out by the hands of deputies, came out anti-pong, antimonopoly , they went out and established their own rules, they indicated well , we do not need general rules, where business is protected, where it can appeal, where it can demand uh, the justifications are european, how then will european business come to us , and at the very beginning of the entry of european funds, we will say and our antimonopoly officer believes that we will have our own we don't want rules, the european commission wants european citizens, businesses to have the same amount of rights as in ukraine, and to say that we cannot you have returned the antimonopoly procedure

because it is pandora's box, now the customs will come out, the tax will come out, and that problem will come out. thank you, larisa mykolaivna, let's move on to decision-making, and koltonovych, 1 minute, invite the deputies to the hall, please. thank you, dear chairman, dear colleagues of our group will support this initiative because real demonopolization in the country did not take place, there were no significant structural changes with monopolies, oligopolies and companies with a single dominant position, there were no monopolies , they strengthened their position, therefore, from this point of view, it is a logical change, but tomorrow we will continue this discussion, which is important, it is important to carry out a real demonopolization policy we also talked about the act of senator senator sherman, we talked about a number of other instruments regarding the distribution of forced division and so on, that is, the reduction

concentration on the market because why is monopolization so scary because monopolization nullifies the investment potential of ukraine minus the investment potential it means that the industrial economic potential as a whole will be lost by the country because monopolization reform of demonopolization is an undeniable priority on the way to increasing the constitutional potential of ukraine to increasing to increasing the level of economic activity in the country, and therefore this personnel solution is both relevant and needs a new program to overcome the monopoly thank you dear colleagues, the discussion is over, let's move on to making decisions in accordance with paragraph 12 of the first part of article 85 of the constitution of ukraine. i am putting to a vote for adoption as a whole the draft resolution registration number 10.001 on the dismissal of olga stanislavovna pischanska from the position of the head of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine. i ask you

to vote for 306, the decision is made resolution of approval thank you olha stanislavivna for your work yes adjournment as a replacement for the performance bilozir please larisa mykhailoivna mykolaivna belozir e.e. the head of the faction of the group please come over to me colleagues well, if i have already continued, i will talk specifically about the law on the administrative procedure, which was, let's say, a condition for receiving a candidate for the european union, and at one time there were also conditions for receiving a post in nato, and our convocation became the only one that accepted it and the draft law

was adopted six times, including thanks to mr. kornienko, who is in charge of the reform of the public administration, the reform of public administration, and i want to say that this law is about protecting citizens, businesses from arbitrariness of state bodies applies to every body of every central body of executive power of local self-government bodies establishes rules if it concerns any negative decisions regarding citizens and businesses and in fact our european partners believe that this law is the main anti-corruption law because it establishes clear rules and procedures for the actions of e- is in power and unfortunately he has to enter soon. at the end of the year, we have such a practice. what did the ministries and some there , for example, tax, antimonopoly, where none

the service to introduce laws in order to exit the working group of experts and to exit this law made a decision not to do so and it was the decision of the government and the prime minister to implement this implement this law and stop this shameful practice of introducing such laws so that some departments escape under the action and what we have today. the ministry began to do this with the hands of deputies, and the law on ecoinspection and the law on the antimonopoly committee were adopted with our approval. therefore , i call on my colleagues to pay attention to the heads of the committee. i am asking you to pay attention to the secretariat so that we looked at this issue so that we do not fall under the influence of this draft law, because one of the conditions of macrosin receiving 50 billion is also the entry into force of this draft law by the european union, the union of professionalism, and

you cannot play here because it is a huge amount of money and above all this is a matter of protecting our citizens and businesses, and i also want to draw attention to the fact that the tax customs are now looking for ways to get out of this draft law, which means that those blocked declarations that can now be appealed will not be possible appeal within the framework of the tax, which is quite difficult to do so, so i want to draw the attention of the deputies and the heads of the secretariat and the heads of secrets and committees that this practice should be stopped because it is one of the conditions and for our larisa mykolayivna, i can only join your position, we will the issue will be further worked out with the committees, because this practice is not very useful, together with the procedure

we will move on to the draft law . thank you, oleksandr serhiyovych. of ukraine, and today many correct draft laws were included in the agenda. i would like to ask to put to a vote the proposal to be included in the agenda for preparation for consideration and tomorrow to consider the draft law that the president spoke about, that all ukrainian society is talking about, that ukrainian society really expects, this is a draft law 96:59 who, during martial law, equates the punishment for corruption to the punishment for treason, you have all heard the president's position, he supports it, he supports it divides, therefore, i really hope that the verkhovna rada supports both the head of state and the authors of the law, and the main ukrainian society

, which requires the parliament to vote on the proposal of dmytro oleksandrovich rozumkov , how did he voice it? 95:59d on the agenda - it is about the support of the local self-government of the army, i ask to change the order and raise this bill to consider it now, because we understand the need for it to be additional e-e additional source of assistance to our armed forces of the security and defense sector in order to provide

them with everything they need, therefore, i very much ask you to put it to a vote now, change the order of priority and consider this bill right now . thank you rohamia from the procedure, now the procedures, then to you rohamia from the procedure, please, colleagues, we now have a very important task, this is to return the declaration, it seems to me that there is an offer now put in front of the changes to the agenda now vote on these two bills, one bought the first one and

then the law on the restoration of declaration and then the agenda please support thank you or is it correct i understand what you are proposing to put 72.69 at the end of today at the end of today of the day is good 9269 at the end of today and alternative dmytro oleksandrovych another version of what rahamia said from the procedure of razumkov only below the two laws to put and not at the end of the day this is

the first and the second can the head of the faction mono-majority now propose to remove below peppi's question i think no, thank you yuriyovych reply please reply dear dmytro oleksandrovich we, like you, are the elected representatives of the people, we go around the hall and collect the opinions of the people and listen to the opinions of our hall thank you for the reasons, the time of reasoning, the reply, then buzhansky, the motives and a replica on a replica is not given, this is what and what is it simply further from the procedure you have then buzhansky from motives without the procedure and then together with the cons-procedure from the buzhansk procedure, please, dear georgyovich if you are really gathering opinions in the hall then please forget the word pep forever never come back to this issue and let's finally move on to voting for kupap and the return of the declaration thank you please razumkov from

the procedure smagliuk from the procedure and we will move on to voting thank you oleksandr serhiyovych but this is still a reply because davyd georgych addressed this to me . unfortunately, i did not address him, i spoke from the procedure, but dear colleagues, i think that the people's deputies and heads of major factions it would not be amiss to go and collect thoughts, but to communicate with society, to go out into the public, and you have heard a lot about thoughts and about their collection and about activities, thank you, please , vasylyuk, you were able to, with god, vasylevska smagliuka , i apologize to olya mykhailivna and then ustinova oleksandr serhiyevich, do not be nervous yes, we understand that on november 4, the parliament made a mistake when it voted for a decision other than peppa's lifelong status. this is the guarantee we received from the european union about

ukraine's accession to the european union vansap forever pet and what you will now be ashamed in front of society and you need to gather opinions on the streets, not here. in the hall, what about the peps, they will tell you about the maldives and everything else about what you are doing . therefore, i think that we should not screw up and vote for one of the last two european integration proposals which should be the return of peppa's lifetime status, the mistake that we must correct in order to be accepted into the european union. therefore, we must vote and we will vote, dear colleagues, if you ask the people who will then look at the verkhovna rada dear council, 99% of them do not know what pep is, but everyone wants to see who bought what and declared it, so i am asking you to support mr. arkhamia that today we should vote on the restoration of the declaration , the register of declarations is open and this should now be the first priority of the verkhovna rada

, so please support this decision. thank you. i am putting to the vote the proposal of dovid georgych rakhan and proceed to the consideration of draft laws with registration numbers 95-87d and 95:34. i ask you to vote for 265. the decision has been taken. before consideration of the issue with the registration number 95-87d draft law a excuse me iryna volodymyrivna 3 minutes and then we will move on to the speech of mina to the speech of european solidarity and the voice is surrendered dear colleagues, i ask you to be very careful , especially the chairman of the committee on anti-corruption policy mr. mrs. radinu and you know a few years ago, when in the parliament we now

adopted the anti-corruption reform , the then president poroshenko and the then government were in this hall in order to show together the unity of all branches of government regarding the need to adopt these laws for obtaining a visa-free visa, therefore, the country received a visa-free visa on time despite the war, now pay attention here there is no president pay attention here there is no government that is actually negotiating about the beginning of the official start of ukraine's accession to the eu and there is no press here, which is very important, although we european solidarity has repeatedly emphasized that these debates regarding the restoration of electronic declarations should be public, and our faction definitely supports the transparency of declarations and that the declarations should be

public from the day of the restoration of declarations. i want to say right away. unfortunately, yesterday, colleagues, there was a falsification of the committee meeting. now, with our vote, you and i will restore the declaration for the deputies of the village council, who cannot go abroad due to zelenskyi’s decision to visit their children, for that they will declare without receiving a penny from the state, but those people who occupy positions with the highest corruption risks. and these are representatives of supervisory boards, heads of state-owned enterprises, representatives and, most importantly , advisers, advisers to the president's office, they are not declared. although they manage today in chernihiv searched lomako and the acting mayor of the city is an instruction of the office of the president in our country, they are terrorizing the opposition, this is an instruction of dan and corruption in the resident, you know when we have an adviser to the office of the president , a freelancer who took part in international negotiations, stands showing off around the lexus , it is not known where it was bought and tells that for the rest of his life he will eat grasshoppers in the country and laugh at all ukrainians, he does not

declare himself to rostovych and this is the decision of the anti-corruption committee, you know when the ladies welcome us with their friends sasha and others they stood near the bank with their underpants hanging up a few years ago and shouted they will wash your dirty underpants, now please tell the bank to wash the bearded underpants that they show to the whole country when they engage in corruption, we demand that before considering the law on the declaration, listen to the transcript of the committee so that you can see how the committee initially supported volodya's amendment arieva regarding the voting of freelance advisers to the president, and then after the bankova district , mrs. razina herself began to re-vote it, including if now the vote is rigged, we will be forced not only to draw the public's attention to it, but also

to appeal to the court. and other laws of ukraine regarding the improvement of the procedure for bringing to justice the persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local self-government, the second reading, mr. serhii kostiantynovych at the rostrum. so, let's begin cases to be taken into account, are there any amendments to be taken into account, please, honcharenko, the number of the amendment or how we will act, amendment number 147, i am taking into account an important law, in fact, but i have a question , what is happening, why are we postponing important decisions to the end of the day, why are we being told now what there are no votes, who will now be guilty of that, which means we are not considering the issue of corruption crimes or openness or registers or transparency, maybe so that people do not find out what is happening in the