Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    September 11, 2023 2:00am-2:30am EEST

2:00 am
[000:00:00;00] by law, we have commissioners for handling complaints about public procurement immediately to the monopoly committee, and secondly, what is the maximum fine that can be for distorting trades , thank you, please give a very short answer, i will not say that it is like an exam, but professionalism should be in everything, i omitted a little, but i continue what was in to the previous question as what and legal practice as i was engaged in my previous activity forward previous as it relates to the functioning of e-e current legislation on antimonopoly legislation it is more appropriate to adopted and already adopted as a basis for the draft law on antimonopoly legislation, where there are levers for the application
2:01 am
of additional measures for the operation of business, but for the protection of economic competition , answering your question. procurement refers to those authorized to carry out public procurement, which are appointed in accordance with the competence of the head of the antimonopoly committee, are not appointed exclusively by the head, there can be no more than ten of them accordingly, the answer to your question i don't think that i confused something, and when answering about fines, clarifying the question, i won't ask , and i won't guess either, i won't be there for 1,000, and so on. well, maybe we'll talk separately.
2:02 am
thank you, please. servant of the people good day i don't have a question, i gave it here sasha, i don't have a question , the recommendation is so small, it's just that you mentioned later when you will work if the hall will support your candidacy, a bill on monopoly was recently voted committee, and in it, appropriate changes were made to the relevant legislation, the name is protected by the legislation on notary, and there the antimonopoly committee was given appropriate powers that fall from the general powers of other state bodies , that is, certain preferences were granted with the previous head of the antimonopoly committee, we had an agreement on the introduction of appropriate changes to the equation of the authority of the anti-corruption authority in terms of receiving information that constitutes a notarial secret, as in other state bodies and filing i will ask you for relevant documents of the prescribed format in the future so that we
2:03 am
can correct this matter and bring the legislation into line, thank you , thank you. if you leave them, including one of the directions, i did not say about them. this is really a close interaction with the honorable people's deputies to achieve the result, namely, legal improvement and bringing to compliance with the legislation thank you, thank you, thank you, pavlo oleksandrovych, you can take your place to speak for a co-report, the chairman of the committee of the verkhovna rada
2:04 am
of ukraine on economic development , dmytro andriyovych natalukha, is invited. of ukraine made a decision to recommend that the verkhovna rada approve the candidacy of pavlo for the post of chairman of the antimonopoly committee, i want to say that we had a committee. today we discussed many difficult issues for a person applying for this position, especially in the conditions of the implementation of the law on oligarchs, the so-called implementation of positions on the deprivation of natural monopolies economic processes in the state have discussed the issue of antimonopoly competition reform as a component of the issues of european integration of our state, and in principle there is an understanding that with
2:05 am
the support of the parliament with the support of the committee such work can be constructive and positive considering that we have a practice when the parliament found a common language with representatives of relevant departments and achieved certain results, in our opinion , the situation here could be completely identical to that, we would prefer to ask support the candidacy for the appointment and vote for thank you thank you please sign up for speeches from the parliamentary factions of the groups
2:06 am
please yaroslav on zheleznyak dear colleagues in any developed democracy the most influential body in the system economic relations. he is more influential than in the tax department, more influential than various economic investigators, the most sometimes inefficient than the national bank, that is why if you look at the compliance of any international company that works not only in ukraine, you will see the first word antitrust tymoshenko is endowed with such powers that can close any -what company in a second and therefore it is very important in every state to build an independent institution of antibodies of the floor
2:07 am
committee, i did not vote for 54-31 precisely because i doubt that we have such a desire and to be honest, i have not yet seen the effective work of the antimonopoly committee, how to check whether it is effective or not, a very simple example, each of you has seen those well, let's be frank, the public procurements that have resounded in the public space , the drums of vegetable cutters, the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which purchases more gloves than before the war and the antimonopoly committee can react to everything, that is why pavlo oleksandrovych asked this question. 10% of the turnover is what the antimonopoly committee can do for distorting the results of public
2:08 am
procurement. i am sure that you will vote for him today. as a representative of mariupol, it is probably even nice that our head of the military administration will now take this position, but i really hope that one day we will get to the point when we will appoint people to create there regardless of any -what branches of government of the institute , thank you, please, by half koltonovych oleksandr serhiyevich, please, platform for the life of peace , thank you, dear oleksandr serhiyovych , continuation of yesterday's topic regarding the anti-monopoly legislation of ukraine, why it is generally so important and what the previous speaker said is one of the fundamental levers of the economic policy of the state. see the antimonopoly committee of ukraine in 2019, when we first arrived , submitted data that 58% of monopolies in ukraine are oligopolies and companies with a dominant position
2:09 am
. it was in the 19th year of 1942, it was a business environment, now the situation has obviously worsened, although these official data are not published, what restrains monopolies in ukraine, they restrain the development of small and medium-sized businesses, they restrain competitors environment, they restrain the attraction of foreign direct investment decreases. both the volume itself is an outflow and the annual inflow of direct foreign investment, this volume is many times smaller than, for example, money transfers of labor migrants, therefore the antimonopoly committee should be an authorized institution and form one of those that will ensure fair rules of economic competition within the country, which is actually what the conclusion of the european commission on the compliance of competition and protection within ukraine is about, there are a number of remarks there you will have to pay attention to this and work with it, since we have obligations within the framework of the implementation of the association agreement , including in this direction, we generally
2:10 am
look at why we come to all these things in the first place. i would like to give two figures from us the gross domestic product last year was only 160 billion dollars. if we take the comparative prices of the 15th year, this is calculated by the world bank, it is only 72 billion dollars. 72 in order to overcome this critical economic backwardness, we must stimulate foreign investment without a transparent there will be no antimonopoly legislation, that is why we support this step, but you will have to work a lot, thank you yes, the restoration of shevchenko evgeny volodymyrovych yes bur between please, dear chairman dear colleagues, dear pavlo oleksandrovich, i
2:11 am
asked you a question about how you are going to fulfill your e-e vision on filling the budget, well, i would also like to make a few strokes, maybe you will take this into account in the work, i would like, and we all would. i think i would like you to start your work by considering the monopolists who influence uh, the life of ordinary people is exactly monopoly on gas, we have one monopolist, we know there is no market for electricity , i would like you to use the powers that we assumed under the former chairman and actually turn the antimonopoly committee into a law enforcement agency, that is, you will have enough powers and you looked at how the prices for the same gas in that oil and gas are formed, for example, they
2:12 am
drive all the thefts, their million- dollar wages, bigotry and everything else into the cost price , equating them in fact to the prices that go to implementation for people in this way, the state monopoly does not receive any profit , does not pay taxes, and therefore you fight and you will fill the budget , this also applies to electricity. to you in this direction of fruitful work, the group of recovery of ukraine supports your candidacy, thank you, please, servant of the people fedorov volodymyr volodymyrovych stanislavskyi dmytro andriyovych invite
2:13 am
the deputies to the hall, we will vote soon thank you very much. dear colleagues, we have already articulated this at the committee meeting . i would like to draw your attention once again. i would like to focus on this and pay attention not only to the potential head of the anti-monopoly committee, but also to the rest of the deputies. one of the most critical issues of the anti-monopoly committee's activity is the regulation of state aid regulation of state aid involves limiting the influence of the state on the development of economic processes , stimulating economic growth, providing aid to certain industries, industries in context or programs 579 or industrial parks or investments, all this is perceived under eu law as state aid and it must be regulated, so i really
2:14 am
wanted us to treat this issue with the antimonopoly committee with extreme attention and meticulousness because the context , the reality and the conditions in which functions of our state are very different from the context of the conditions and conditions in which the eu states are and the historical circumstances that led to the regulation of state aid there and here are also critically different. we do not we simply have a moral right on the eve of recovery after victory in this war to tie our own hands and tie the hands of our institutions and our ministry in helping certain branches of the economy in the recovery of that dear mr. pavly, i once again draw your attention to this, i remind you of the position according to the law about localization, which should also be paid special attention in the context of ignoring this requirement by many administrators of public funds and state aid, colleagues, please
2:15 am
let us not miss this chance thank you and be laska european solidarity nina petrivna from the south please invite the deputies to the hall we will vote now please oleg mykhailovych synyutka please pass the word no i do not support for the south please yes no thank you thank you deer i listened to a section of the various groups of factions that are speaking now because really all of you emphasized that the antimonopoly committee has not been able to implement its main function - it is the protection of economic competition on the basis of the equality of business entities , article 3 of the law on the antimonopoly committee
2:16 am
but i would like to address the candidate. if you listen carefully. because here you will hear things, perhaps in which you would start your work . have you heard about the work of the antimonopoly committee in the field of public procurement ? the creation and distortion of the results of tenders. please tell me over the years of this great embezzlement in the construction of roads. have you heard about the facts of the investigation of the multi-billion tenders? did they investigate? did it begin? the investigation of such conspiracies is a large enterprise that still wins the largest of all state orders, including the freeway and the south highway in 21 years, more than uah 50 billion were won in one hand, despite the fact that other participants were generally thrown out of such
2:17 am
tenders. under the law on public procurement, but the municipal council may have the authority to investigate conspiracies, non -competitive concerted actions, but for all these years, how much have we heard about all this corruption, and i tell them, i have never been informed about the beginning investigation into any scandalous purchase of the ministry of defense. please understand the reform and the adopted law. you are generally losing your independence now, but you are acquiring great functions that do not belong to an organization that should fight for the economic . please be a serious member of the motherland. thank you , mr. chair. with all due respect to the candidate, i wanted to hear the words in his speech
2:18 am
monopoly monopoly influence market division merger takeover merger of legal entities separation of legal entities control instead moreover, i heard the words income from the state budget, i was a good prosecutor, some other words that , with all due respect to mr. candidate , have nothing to do with the work of the antimonopoly committee. i believe that the role of the antimonopoly committee even now and especially after the end of the war will be absolutely decisive, and exactly there it will not be necessary to chop with an ax and how to use a scalpel in all countries, an economic scalpel as an economic tool for controlling markets and influencing markets unfortunately, i did not hear any of this during the speech, instead, they talked there
2:19 am
something about volunteers about small business and so on and so on and so on by the way, the position of the antimonopoly committee is now very important in connection with the e-e recommendations to the venetian commission on the law on oligarchs and by the way, i didn't hear the word oligarch in the speech either dear mr. candidate for the post of the head of the antimonopoly committee, with all due respect dear mr. candidate to you as a person. over-important state such an over-important state institution that needs systemic reform as the antimonopoly committee but we wish you success in this thank you thank you we are moving on to making a decision please take your seats we will be determined dear colleagues in accordance with paragraph 12 of the first part
2:20 am
of article 85 of the constitution of ukraine i am voting for adoption in general, the draft resolution under registration number 10 015 on the appointment of pavlo oleksandrovych kyrilenko to the post of chairman of the antimonopoly committee ukrainians are ready to vote, i ask you to vote for 250 decisions, the resolution was adopted , the resolution was adopted by factions. please show, we congratulate you
2:21 am
, dear pavlo oleksandrovych, we wish you success in your new difficult tasks. faction please tkachenko for restoration trust for restoration two factions dear colleagues, we welcome all of you and today we want to present our inter-factional deputy associations of the vpu of ukraine i think that, unfortunately, everyone already in the country knows how to translate and what does the abbreviation idp mean - these are internally displaced people, they are all people the same as you, the same as us, moreover, among our inter-factional deputy association, there is a large
2:22 am
the number of people displaced people i am maksym i am from luhansk ruslan horbenko from the city of luhansk serhiy kozyr from donetsk oleksandr sukhov from lysychansk mr. noble from the city of rubizhne serhiy and our other colleagues who have been internally displaced persons for the 10th year we have created our inter-factional parliamentary associations in order to protect the interests and rights of these millions of people who really need the help of the state, we are definitely grateful to our main heroes of today, our defenders and defenders , our armed forces of ukraine, let's applaud this hero to these people, but i want to remind and that we constantly remember about the huge number of people, as i have already mentioned , this is more than 5 million people, and these are only officially registered immigrants in our country. i am very grateful to everyone, i am grateful to our president
2:23 am
for the fact that in his latest addresses he constantly mentions helping these people, i am grateful to all the regional military administrations, which are few in number, but there are such leaders who take care of these people and remember, for example, this is the luhansk administration, which, thank god , has created over these months, created hubs, created places where there is help for displaced people unfortunately, the donetsk regional administration was about a million people who moved and today are in all corners of the country, but still we hope that we will all remember these people and i want from all of us from our team from all the immigrants to congratulate the two cities of the heroes two cities of the ukrainian heart of our country a few days ago it was the day of the city of donetsk let 's congratulate our ukrainian donetsk and in a few days on the ninth of september as always
2:24 am
it was and will be we will congratulate my native our native happy birthday to luhansk, happy birthday to ukrainian luhansk and maria , a word to you, a few words, yes. good day, dear colleagues. i want us to pay attention and applaud the incredible forces of defense, which exactly one year ago released one of the most difficult guests of this brutal war, this is the kharkiv direction, then a year ago, friends, 400 settlements were liberated , more than 150,000 ukrainians heard
2:25 am
their relatives, hugged them, kissed her, thank you, thank you, dear mfo of the vpu, let's move on to the next item on the agenda. amendments to the code of ukraine on administrative offenses and other laws of ukraine regarding the improvement of the procedure for bringing to justice persons authorized to perform state or local functions self-government registration number 95-87d on september 6, 2023, the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on law enforcement addressed me with a proposal to eliminate inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the text adopted by the verkhovna rada of ukraine on september 5, 2023 of the law of ukraine amending the code of ukraine on administrative offenses and of other laws of ukraine regarding the improvement of the procedure for bringing to justice persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local
2:26 am
self-government, registration number 95 87-10 during the preparation of the text of the adopted law for signature, inconsistencies were found in its individual provisions , in connection with which the verkhovna rada of ukraine, in accordance with the second part of the second article of article 80 of article 131 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, submitted proposals for the elimination of inconsistencies in this law, materials for you provided in accordance with the fourth part of article 131 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the discussion of this issue is not held, so let's go to the vote. now i will put each proposal to the vote separately. there are two of them
2:27 am
proposal number one is put to the vote ready to vote please vote proposal number one for 251 the decision is accepted proposal is taken into account proposal number two is put to the vote i ask the people's deputies to vote for 255 the decision is taken the proposal is taken into account for consideration of this issue completed thank you the next item on the agenda is the draft laws some will be without discussion, some will be with a little discussion, so please don't diverge too far. so, let's move on to the draft law 94,83-2 draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on the judiciary and the status of judges and some laws of ukraine regarding the change in the status and order of formation of the service of disciplinary inspectors of the higher council of justice, second reading, please, representative
2:28 am
of the committee, chairman of the committee, please, denis vyacheslavovych maslov and we had edits, the performances were serious, demich vlasenko and demchenko , three edits, 6 minutes, a series of 115 minutes, seven, i don’t see seven, well, er, 7 minutes, vlasenko, then demchenko, and then we move on to voting ok, and the restoration. ok, thank you, miss. 7 minutes. thank you, mr. chairman, that i have 117 amendments. i do not want to raise them all . i will only take the speech for 7 minutes. with the constitution of ukraine, there is a constitutional body called the supreme council of justice, according to the constitution, the supreme council of justice has a number of powers, including, among
2:29 am
its powers, the power to bring non- judges to disciplinary responsibility two years ago, this session hall voted that contrary to the constitution, and this is my deep conviction , contrary to the constitution, the supreme council of justice de facto de facto took away this authority by creating some institute of disciplinary inspectors, which is not provided for by the constitution, and this institute of disciplinary inspectors was given certain powers to decide on consideration of disciplinary proceedings against judges, that is, in fact, instead of the constitutional body of the supreme council of justice, some people tell me that this is not the case, but look, and then once the vrp also considers this issue. in the final case, i gave this very
2:30 am
simple and clear example to the honorable chairman of the committee several times. if , god forbid, the chairman wants to get married, then i will choose his wife, and let him get married, and then it will mean that he is married. they offer us approximately the same model for the work of the supreme council of justice, taking away constitutional powers from the constitutional body, so they will then consider the conclusions of the disciplinary inspectors, and so they will then evaluate these conclusions but they cannot consider any cases themselves, this is a huge problem , the first problem is the second problem , why was there a need

14 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on