[000:00:00;00] them with this opportunity because they took these towers for themselves. you can see on the video how our military dismantles the antennas of the radar stations. well, this is a double plus . first of all, they will be taken to our scientists now . what will i analyze? those who watch first this will make it possible to counteract in the future the operation of such hls there , the frequencies of the operating mode will be recognized so that they can be silenced by means of the second. the surveillance system in this region is currently destroyed by the gur, here is the video published by the intelligence at the end

of the story, they say, well, the military says that now crimea is a few steps closer to the liberation of crimea measure means getting closer to the liberation of crimea. is it more of a political symbolic statement ? i don't think that. well, let it be political and symbolic, let it be too, but dear victory, any victory. in the south, it brings the liberation of crimea closer to us. we slowly take it as a kind of vise and bypass the right on the left well, but the main step is the main step, the infantry will fulfill its main mission when we liberate the bible of the country , the mainland rooster and approach directly to the crimean peninsula, this will mean that the operation to liberate the crimea directly

a general question regarding these boyka towers has also begun. is the balance of power in the black sea changing in any way ? because before this we have repeatedly heard that the situation in the black sea is almost completely controlled by russia. it is quite correct. in fact, when the enemy attacked us in the sky and in the sea, he had, to be more precise, also in terms of air power and ships, he had an incredible advantage tens of times, whether it was preserved or not , of course. and he politicians have many more planes and in terms of ships, our commander does not eat papa admiral between papa there , according to his calculations, last year there were 12 to one, they have an advantage now four to one, but the point is no longer in the number of warships there, but in the way

they use tactics, they win more than anyone else banks there are ships or am i the one who acts who actively acted while creatively who imposes his will on the enemy and obviously in this situation of dominance over the black sea the enemy did not succeed in gaining as his own over the air also on the sea the struggle continues against the exchange and precisely activity creativity and the strength of will is demonstrated by the armed forces of ukraine well, then he told the others that he hopes to convince the us president joe biden in the near future to approve the decision on the transfer of takams to ukraine, maybe it will happen in the fall

in the fall of this year, volodymyr zelenskyi is preparing to visit the usa. do you think the time has come to transfer attackcams to ukraine, or do the united states have any reasons to disagree with this decision, what is holding them back, only in this case it is important what nato and congressmen think and most importantly - the white house, the head of the white house, the president of the united states is currently well compared to well, at least six months ago, the pressure on the wybery administration on uh is happening from all forms with uh bicameral and bipartisan legislative all uh, they support the transfer of missiles to ukraine, but the presidency takes a very cautious position. and this is his decision and when it will happen, who knows, but judging by the fact that information appears more and more often in the media, it is almost

official, this is half official, about what kind of struggle is going on in the white house itself, the transfer to the missiles is the maintenance of the same pressure, so it is likely in the near future, i will add to this, the transfer of attacks , in my opinion, depends very much on the transfer of german cruise missiles, because there approximately the same situation, chancellor scholz is the only one in germany who does not want to make a decision on the transfer of missiles, he wants to be a leader in europe, but such a leader as to go after the united states, as it were, there was wealth and he took seven, only we don’t have it, but the american promise was there and then the leopards left i think that if it

receives attacks, it will be soon or very quickly . it means that some of the advisers of the us president are concerned with the activation of the transfer and the transfer of new videos of weapons in ukraine, very cautiously believing that we may cross some red lines. what will this lead to an escalation in relations between the united states and russia, and god forbid the third world war will take place there and other such a wing really exists, but the security forces and the pentagon and

the minister of defense convince the president that such a path has already been taken and further retreat. i think that the americans too cannot statements from the american side also recently, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff of the united states, mark milley, said that the ukrainians have about one and a half months. well , he said 30-45 days for an active counteroffensive, but if the cold weather comes later, then we will have to it will be more difficult to maneuver, it may be necessary to somehow suspend it, is it possible to assume that, firstly , do you agree with this opinion, and secondly , what does this mean, is it possible to assume that if during these months and a half ukraine does not

receive the necessary weapons, then it will have to to wait until spring and then resume these negotiations, the head of the us national security council is going to the data of his services, and the main intelligence service of the ministry of defense of the us armed forces is the intelligence agency of the ministry of defense. revealed more openly revealed this whole situation and according to his words, how he said that he sees success in the armed forces of ukraine throughout the fall with a probability of somewhere around 40-50%. uh, but even if we don't have a language of success in the south then the achievements that the armed forces of ukraine have already achieved will allow them to blur the success in the next year, and he has such an interesting

, very rework, he says that you know, i give percentages, and if i had talked about it 2-3 weeks ago, they would have been much less. it is not yet evening, the percentages of the calculations of even our partners will change , which i believe, it is necessary to understand that the natural conditions they only affect the nature of the conduct of hostilities and not their direction land. actually, is it a match or autumn in this case did not play a role, but in some period, there will be several months when there will be mud , when there will be heavy rains, the difficult movements of armored vehicles will be in the minus, yes, but then there will be authorities when brody, the equipment can be moved there are mainly infantry battles, not because of the weather, but because of the nature

of the enemy's defenses, mainly infantry battles and the course of their armored vehicles, your large number of armored vehicles is not like that, it has a serious effect here, it is very important, i would like to break through we were able to break through the defense to the point that favorable weather conditions - this is a breakthrough , e.e., entered the operational space , and the large armored units themselves, then for them , this period is very important for them. our soldiers will fight to do to the enemies and regardless of the weather or the chlorine themselves. thank you for joining our broadcast. pavlo lakiychuk , head of non-stop programs of the center for global studies, the strategy of the 21st century, we

talked about taking control and meaning of this tower boyka what was reported today, what significance will it have, they also discussed the situation at the front thank you very much silver forestry is a fundamental part of the front for the ukrainian troops and the russian army, because whoever controls the forest will be able to move forward, now the line of conflict passes right in the middle of the forest in the armed forces of ukraine are restraining the onslaught of russian troops, the fighting on this part of the front does not subside, and one of the lines in the srebynsk forest is held by the 67th separate mechanized brigade, our colleagues yevgenia kitaeva and anna kudryavtseva prepared a report from there. look, we can move to the position, line up and

wait for the signal. now we are standing for a while. sky to go. flying rushes are almost constantly looking behind the lines of combat. so, in principle, we react in time to movements of arms and infantry to open fire. there are their firing points and we are trying to suppress it, extinguish it, that is, i saw a little of

it on the salad. very effective, very effective, if there were more of them. it was very beautiful and very good. it helps the troops and infantry, and everyone understands that its main convenience is self-sufficiency , very fast, very mobile. the forest is a difficult, difficult section of the front, it was very difficult, very difficult, we can't no , we will pass in front no, they can't walk

, the forest is very dense, for each section of the forest, it is necessary to fight , to fight, to fight, every tree comes under water, the channel of their assault actions in almost all areas of our area of ​​​​responsibility failed. and they suffered a colossal flow there, there were great losses in lives. of a combat clash, if a weighted battle is going on, somewhere they are quieting down, somewhere else they are becoming more active , well, probably the forest, then the estuary, kramatorsk , slavyansk, respectively, the route to kharkov. and

why the forest? to contain the difficulty, probably artillery, because, unfortunately, they do not have a shortage of ammunition, which we were told about, that they already have those stocks, the stocks are almost finished, that is , according to the interceptions, there is information that they throw out a lot of ammunition per day on our heads and

assault groups will try to break through our line of defense of ukraine, the leader of the dprk, kim jong-un, left on a special train from pyongyang to russia, the process was reported by the media in south korea today, according to journalist sources, the train in which probably kim jong-un is moving to vladivostok, the kremlin confirmed that the leader of the dprk will visit russia in the coming days at the invitation of putin. this will probably happen tomorrow, because the train ride from pyongyang to vladivostok takes about 20 hours . the likely result of the meeting with putin, which jong-un can achieve, is an agreement on the supply of north korean weapons to russia. weapons that the kremlin needs to continue the war in ukraine, as previously noted by the bloomberg agency, the rapprochement between the dprk and russia can make the world a little

more dangerous, blumberg writes that north korea has significant stocks of ammunition, which, according to some experts, can be counted in millions of units , in addition, north korea can supply russia with spare parts for tanks , for example, t-54 and t-62, because it has large stocks of soviet equipment, in return from russia it can receive food aid, advanced technologies for satellites and nuclear submarines, as well as oil products and money, bloomberg notes that it will be easy for russia and the dprk to establish supplies, since they have a land corridor, and last year there was railway connection has been restored, russia and the dprk can also carry out deliveries by sea, at the same time, by cargo ships, cargo ships will not have to enter international waters . well, if we consider the partnership between russia and the dprk through the prism of the war in ukraine, how far can this cooperation go, what will it affect, how can it specifically affect on the course of the war and really , there are no instruments of influence or even

pressure on the dprk in the process, today we will also talk to our air, bohdan ferentz, an expert-international candidate, has already joined of political science good evening good evening, congratulations, and therefore the western media write that north korea is ready to sign an arms supply agreement with russia under which moscow can offer ammunition, reactive systems , even short-range ballistic missiles , tell me, from your point of view, what are the prospects for implementing such an agreement well i believe that , in principle, there was already a spacer from north korea to russia, it just wasn't in the public sphere, it's the first, the second. well, unfortunately , such an implementation can take place because, well, there is stockpiles of soviet-style weapons in north korea, which the russian federation needs, and thirdly, that is, we see that these

dictators, autocrats, they are now trying to cooperate more and more with each other, and since north korea is such a bright example of such a form of autocracy, that is why, in fact, now this attraction to the kremlin it also happens here without china, because china also plays its role in the context of how relations between north korea and the russian federation are developing. therefore, this is a threat, a threat not only of a regional nature for south korea for japan, but of a more global nature, but this was expected , that is, i repeatedly emphasized on the air that the risk of such cooperation is absolutely serious and what concerns the pressure on north korea well, unfortunately in western countries well, let's say so

an exhaustive list of tools for pressure there, but we see that some kind of preservation took place in north korea and now there are absolutely no contacts there, even comparing when earlier the same donald trump tried to show his leadership business ambitions and came to a meeting with the north korean leader, but the results did not last long, you said that in fact cooperation between the dprk and russia had already begun, but no agreements had been signed yet. why can't they continue such knee-jerk cooperation, why is it necessary to sign some kind of agreement, well, at least that's what the western media write that it will still be signed, which one today

well, first of all, because for north korea it is the opportunity to show one's subjectivity, let's say, we could have it here and there, russia needs our support, our cooperation, and we are ready for such cooperation, and for russia, well, it is now trying to form this view around itself of a belt, let's say, of autocratic countries, and thus, on the one hand, in need of weapons yes, which, unfortunately, it uses in the context of the russian-ukrainian war, but also in opposition, let’s say, to the western world order, this is also an element that should be understood and analyzed, as you said at the beginning of our conversations that, if i understood you correctly, there are no effective levers of influence in the western countries. well, actually bloomberg also wrote about the fact that the west has no tools of influence because the dprk is already under

numerous sanctions, but on the other hand there is the usa and for example the strengthening of the dprk, including, would mean a threat to the key allies of the us, probably japan or south korea . is there even? the united states does not have any leverage and cannot stop this cooperation. he said exactly that about the allies and within the framework we hear you, please tell us if you or we have any problems with the connection, yes, the connection was interrupted, well, regarding the allies. indeed, i noted about this that this is a serious risk for japan , the same for south korea and here in the usa they have leverage with their military power

, that is, what ensures, let’s say plus or minus, some kind of balance in this region in the context of security, that is why joint exercises are being conducted , cooperation is being strengthened with allies with japan , as well as with south korea. and otaki itself tools they can allow in the context of ensuring security in this region and confronting the threat from north korea , but for the supply of weapons to russia, which will then be used in the war against ukraine , the measure cannot influence . i understood you correctly. well, i think that hardly in the context supply from north korea to russia, there are not so many tools, let’s say so , and i am convinced that such a supply has already

taken place, how large are the stocks of weapons in the dprk, well, there is a plus-minus idea that the intelligence services of at least south korea, japan, and american intelligence are working, but i don't think that we have this information in full, i think that there are enough stocks of soviet-style weapons because, let 's say, it was one of the elements for the soviet union in the context of allied various relationships there and since it has always been problematic for north korea to obtain these weapons from other sources

. just these samples, i.e. the soviet classification is unfortunately suitable for russian weapons, so let's say the risk is serious, but not excessive, because i think we and our allies were ready for this, and here we really need to understand how to resist further deepening of cooperation and not only there, for example between north korea and russia, but also between china, things are an even more serious threat. that is, i don't think there will be any sharp statements about this because, first of all, north korea is dependent on china economically

, resource-wise, and secondly, well, we see china's position that it basically supports the russian federation, although it avoids, let's say, direct participation in the context of the russian-ukrainian war, and here there is a risk of further, er, further, as it were, advancement in this matter to western countries , the united states also assesses such a character as a potential threat in the context of military cooperation between china and the russian federation did you understand one more topic, literally, briefly, today, too, the financial times wrote that nato countries intend to hold the largest joint exercises of the cold war in germany, poland, and the baltic states in february and march already in the 24th year. what does this indicate ? in addition to the security plane, is there any

political choice? why is the plane always governed by political decisions and political processes? well, the context of global danger is becoming more acute. troops within nato is extremely important, that is, the west is preparing for the potential threat of the expansion of this threat from the russian federation. in this way, they also show their readiness to protect their borders, the borders of the sovereign countries of nato member states, the fact that these exercises are large-scale. well, of course, the reason for everything is the russian war and what is happening here in ukraine, that's why there is definitely a confrontation that will deepen

. centaur is possible as a federation. well, we see that north korea is already included there at the weekend . by the way, the summit of the g20 itself just ended, after all, on the 20th, and as a result , a declaration was adopted, which was strongly criticized in kyiv, and in the declaration , russia was not called the aggressor, but there it was in general, that all countries should adhere to, or rather, refrain from actions that contradict the territorial values ​​of any state, well, in short, for peace in everything, for peace in the whole world, but it could hardly be otherwise because what uh russian foreign minister lavrov took part in the g20 summit ah but what does it mean for ukraine and why what do you think key allies of kyiv among which was the united states yes at this summit and the countries of the european union why did they sign

this declaration well, first of all, we were really dissatisfied with those wordings in the final document because it does not clearly outline who bears full responsibility for the brutal war in the center in the heart of europe. yes , it is russia, firstly, secondly. if we compare the final declarations between this year's and last year's, right there at the ball, the document has more relaxed formations and it's true why this happens because the war drags on, it stretches in time because, again, a lot depends on the receiving party, this is india india everything was done in order to get a certain result in the end. what is the communique and what is the website itself ? india tried to completely, so to speak , bypass such conflict-causing

internal crises between the members of the delegations. dozens of questions in order to, on the one hand, show one's leadership ambitions of a global order, and on the other hand, to directly, after all, not really happen. in the end, nothing, because it is clear that between western countries and between some countries of other geographies, the position in in the context of the russian-ukrainian war , this is actually how i would explain what happened on the sidelines of the summit . some states also said, well, there, brazil , for example, indonesia, arab, some states , they directly take a position of observation more and balancing in the russian-ukrainian war than clearly condemning this aggressive war, but actually it