[000:00:00;00] and textbooks in all subjects total control что позвонят программе качество единства образовательного спасибо полный печедно на новый учебники планируется осуществить в межанышие пяти, and here the life of children is not russia. at school they wash the bridge before lunch and provide full development, and then when they come home, parents will ask to watch a movie should you read the book that is so promoted by the top rashit presenter look at this is definitely a talented work this film is an amazing thing, a film that all had to convey it siyanie evchennoi zhizni or it is a heavy rain, it is noticeable that a person is bad, but he is trying hard to turn everyone into a blind faith. no, not even to god, but to the king, who will then send them to the slaughter. you will even be 16 horizontal bars by one person, and at the end of it, he will already be a completely different person

if you even drag your life like that, they are changing this situation because in modern russia, if you can put it that way , a monument is being consecrated to the person who destroyed the church and its ministers in this very kingdom, in the swamp , cars are being converted into mobile temples in order to to mourn the murdered racists sooner and forgive the murders of peaceful citizens of ukraine, and only in this god-killed country can there be communities called the archangel and the special forces, now you consider the archangel of the special forces, today we received children's letters , children write such letters to murderers and terrorists at school , drawing on before them, the tricolor and folding them into a supposedly soldier’s pilot’s cap writes to us egor hello, our fighter, i have one

sled. i practice karate. i have many awards. fascists on the first ukrainian front, even where you are fighting nazis, he is a sapper, he came to berlin and returned home alive. fighter, do everything and return with victory. special forces will turn out not to be needed by anyone after returning to their homeland, that ukraine has been carrying out attacks on the absolutely peaceful russian federation for a long time. the murders of prigozhin are being demolished by the british. where did you open the bilisk? yevgeny sees prigozhin in

nikolaev. and here, here, there, there were horns, there were graves, that's all , it's all snesino. what are you doing, you guys? all the graves are here. here are all the crosses of the guys who insulted the dead for 23 hours . вагнеров всё вот оны был больше, so there is no promised glory or honor, think and all the promises given by putin 's brilliant cook will be fulfilled, we doubt the guarantor of these promises has rested so that there is no man, there is no one to fulfill them and the destroyed cemeteries mercenaries will come for all the ready

valuables, i surrendered we will destroy their colleague olga skabeev alive, the pope, the tigers of oseyana, dmitri kiselyov, so that if they did not tear open their stomachs and shout about the fact that everyone is the winner , so far they are massively destroying only themselves both physically, morally and intellectually in

this nation has no future if the people of russia continue to endure all this madness and gloom into which the kremlin and putin have plunged them . the instant of a terrible war that has been going on for centuries, but the whole world has already convinced us of our independence, don't hide it , don't drown it, don't burn it, don't shoot it and the greater our hatred, the stronger our independence, the closer our victory is, we prove independence it is normal to be afraid every day, but it is brave to admit your fear. we need courage in the tcc. courage overcomes fear. we continue the broadcast with mykhailo podalyak, the anti-crisis adviser

of the head of the office of the president of ukraine , mr. mykhailo . congratulations. our conversation because just yesterday i read two completely different quotes from two officials in the news . the first was the president's statement in an interview with the economist publication. i am ready and my team must be ready for a long war and emotionally i am ready to send this message to everyone that we are ready for a long war and we must use our strength to speak according to such a state and at the same time in these same days during the conference of the european yalta strategy in kyiv, which day did we end? the head of the main intelligence department, mr. budanov, says that i do not share the opinion that it will be a long war, this is my personal opinion based on analysis and data, that is,

mr. budanov believes that it will not be long when as a journalist, as a citizen, i see two completely different, well, opposite positions regarding the duration of the war. i have the impression that we do not have this one voice of the government that communicates. why was the marathon created? please explain what is happening with communications regarding the duration of the war . it is very good that we do not have of one voice that we have a discussion because then in the discussion you can get correct assessments but the right president and the right mr. budanov but these are two different assessments of two different states what mr. president says speaks about what he sees a slow change in the attitude of our partners, that is, they are still not as decisive as they should have been if we want to quickly end the war, this also applies to the transfer of weapons and the corresponding assessments and the suspension of russia's membership in a number of international institutions and in general , other international status of russia he means the political status, that is, the president

is talking about a more global picture about the need to change the assessment of the global communities, first of all, he is not talking about ukraine and not about russia, but above all, it is necessary for the global communities to change their assessment of prospects of the historical prospects of russia and then it will be clear that in this form russia has no right to exist. well, then the appropriate decisions, legal decisions, or there physical solutions, is meant the transfer of this or that equipment, that is, the president is talking about the feeling that the world does not fully understand what to return before the war, it is impossible to agree with russia on any agreements there in minsk 2 3 4 10 impossible and in general it is impossible to conduct a negotiation process with russia and it is also impossible to return russia to international law but this is not yet a conscious position not only of ukraine. well, not only of the baltic countries or of northern europe, but of the lower large countries. they still think that it is possible to somehow build a party on a chessboard that will agree to certain conditions, this is

in relation to the president, that is, he gives more broadly we have an understanding of what is happening in the global political summers regarding mr. bohdanov. he just talks exclusively about the instrumental, armed, and resource component of this war, and at the same time analyzes the resource needs of the russian federation ukraine, that is, accordingly, he understands how many weapons we will receive, what our production will do, even taking into account all the troubles that we know and so on in the domestic market, and he also evaluates the resource capacity of the russian federation , despite the fact that, for example, sanctions, again, here too i am going to the president that the sanctions are not in this form. they are working as they were supposed to work , taking into account all the rhetoric about these sanctions and so on, based on the mathematics of resources , this war cannot be achieved for a long time, because resources in russia are also scarce and so on, but based on the global context , there is a certain misunderstanding of global cages. what should be pressed on russia, and the president is working on this, pressing the global elite so that

the subjectivity of ukraine is extrapolated to the necessary amount of resources for us and in the same time, mr. budanov, all that does is reduce the resource capabilities of the russian federation, and both are right in a completely broader context . well, you see it in this way. it is completely clear and i see it as a different variant once again and not a different variant, everyone has their own level of competence and their own level of responsibility, mr. budanov is talking about war and the resource possibility to ensure the conduct of hostilities on the part of the russian federation. i absolutely clearly understand that if sanctions are indeed will work and here we move on to the president, we should not talk about sanctions, but really effectively implement and control them, and so on, and the president talks about a broader concept of war as such, because for the president there is there are many other platforms where certain decisions are made, not only those related to the resources of the ukrainian or russian war, you understand, there are also global political interests

. well, for example, we are talking about the war in ukraine , but at the same time we are looking at what is happening in the far east, we are talking about war in ukraine activity north korea meets with everything in vladivostok yes and so on we talk about the war in ukraine and see that today in the african context we see coups that are happening one after another there and so on, we are talking about the war in ukraine, today we are talking about the fact that in latin america, again, there are a number of countries that are absolutely oriented towards the russian federation and make political statements, make er in favor of the russian federation, not realizing that in this way they are depriving themselves strategic prospects, but in this case, then comment on mr. budanov’s words from this angle that russia’s resource capabilities are being exhausted, but we see in the practice of our war that our resource capabilities also seriously depend on our western partners and in the western partners help us uh with a constant delay of several months. that is, we started asking

for planes a long time ago, we will receive them only in the future so and so with all types of weapons with tanks , artillery, missile weapons, bmps, that is, can we also count on our own resources if the partners are constantly delaying it and only now it seems that the attacks are already on the table with biden , everything is on the table and we will get everything yes, you are absolutely right and this is the problem, exactly , exactly, you confirm what i say, i.e. resources based on the analysis of resources, if everything was in a timely manner, well, that is, we received the packages that we agreed on, not in four months, 5 months, but in a timely manner, then definitely the disposition on the front line would be different , but this is a question of the global elites. the problem is that they are very conservative, that is they are very indecisive and this needs to be changed, and based on this, in any case, i would single out three components, first, they will be with us until the end, well, that is, the point of no return

has been passed, yes, that is, there is no scenario where they would say no, we will not help you any more, this is definitely a rosy notion than the dream of the russian federation, and they invest a lot of resources on this to say that ukraine is tired of the war with our western partners. they will not help us, this is not the case, they will be until the end to help and so on, the second component is all the same, their determination gradually increases by two or three percent , that is, they still understand that the program is to cover up what we constantly say on the air , the program in ukraine, weapons - it is not about the escalation of the war. on the contrary, it sells escalation because then russia will be concentrated only here and definitely then it will be clear that ukraine fights much more creatively and fights much more effectively, and so on, and russia will have no resources where russia cannot take a resource within the framework of international law how are we someone to any country help with a military instrument why because it is an aggressor country any other country that helps russia it violates international law

and will have corresponding legal consequences any country that helps ukraine does not violate it. on the contrary, it does so within the framework of international law, well, that is, and so on, but there is a third component in relation to our production, so it is gradually developing, it will increase. i understand that we would like ideal formulas. i did it, and tomorrow it will already be scaled to a thousand missiles. for example, if there are a thousand units of this or that weapon , it does not work like that. why? investments in military-industrial complexes in order to at least analytically approach the figures that are spent in this war, which means, first of all, ammunition , first of all shells, missiles, and so on. that there are a lot of industries that need to be invested through and including together with our partners and that the good of non-transporters and regarding missiles of a certain range and regarding drones of a certain

configuration and so on and all this is invested modern world or rather not so modern war needs such a scale as you and i have today needs completely different figures than everyone calculated before this war you say that our support by 1.5-2 percent is gradually increasing but how does it correlate with the statement of the g20 final with these comedians on 35 pages where the big twenty were afraid to mention the russian federation, which is the aggressor, and limited themselves to a very neutral wording literally written off from the un charter that they condemn the intervention of the eu in general and the violation of the sovereignty of ukraine, but they say about territorial integrity and about the creation of the tet, and it is as if the developers were the cause of that. it is clear that the cause is only the one who is on other sovereign territories and who is on the sovereign territory

only the russian federation and in russia there was no mandate and there were no legal motivations for entering someone else 's territory and so on, they talk about it, but the question is that i am returning to the global space as a whole. well, it is obvious that not all countries are ready to accept unequivocally a position that is advantageous to them strategically well, they simply don't quite understand what world they live in, this is a question of analysis, we talked about it even on the eve of this war in our today's partners also incorrectly assessed russia and the consequences of this war and the scope of the invasion and so on and so on and what do we want from a country that lives by completely different concepts and is generally used to the fact that russia is a certain percentage of the premium gray money mass, well, of course, russia spends everything they have left there you spend an insane amount of cash to integrate your narratives

into the position of a number of countries, especially the countries of the global cock, but the countries of the global cock do not support russia anymore. this is obvious. look at the change in the position of china, the change in the position of brazil very briefly. for certain countries, this moment is not for to support russia already, they understand that russia is already a disappeared country , a disappeared country, they use it to increase their weight, so at an extremely dramatic price for us, okay, mikhail, eh, this is the first part of our conversation literally after the release of the news, we will return and then we will continue with domestic politics , if you can call it that, and i will be interested specifically to begin with, what awaits us with the declaration of ukrainian chevron officials

that are approaching victory, the enemies thought that independence is just a word for us, but already with they were convinced of the first steps on our land for centuries, we defend our independence and are ready to fight for it again , the defense forces of ukraine are stubbornly relentless step by step enemy claws, our earth, our will, our independence, we thank you for every moment and for this day of independence, we prove every

day to be afraid, it is normal, and to admit your fear is brave we need brave people update data in the tcc bravery defeats fear, we return to the promised conversation, more precisely, the continuation of the conversation with mykhailo podelyak, the anti-crisis adviser the head of the president's office and promised to talk about internal affairs now after discussing the international issue, what is it called? and the most powerful internal story now is the declaration the declaration of officials, which was closed during martial law and removed from open access, now the deputies voted for this draft law to which they returned it, but will make it open in a year, again motivating it as martial law, a petition against it received a record number of votes in european partners who are also following this and our membership in the eu depends on an open

declaration, somehow the partners from below treated this situation with incomprehension, and now all hope is that the president will impose this on this bill, can you explain that in your opinion, what is happening with this official declaration when all the deputies know how important it is but do not vote for it , and they probably want to end their political careers without feeling for society, this is a slightly broader question, it is not only about open declaration, it is about uh the conformity of the state institution in a society that is at war, we are saying that we are not talking about declarations, but about corruption in general and how to restore trust between the institutions of society and the state , show how honest you are, that is, how about you you can do it, you have to show your wealth if you were related to a state institution correctly well, you have to prove that you, during the war, while others paid a great personal price or gave away what they

had there and so on and this also applies to business and just citizens of ukraine and so on that you have become more wealthy at this time . well, it will be necessary to explain this and it is absolutely correct , but i have another question, this is a counter question. well, it will be written there that in the 22nd or 23rd you additionally received real estate there, some kind of car or something else so that you would have time to go to cyprus, so the skipper can be extradited well, i think that i simply do not understand the logic, that is, not only you will open in any case, but you still do it so that they hate you for the fact that you are formally there, having given yourself a couple of months there, knowing a little about the history of ukrainian parliamentarism, i suspect that the scheme is such that in a year it will be possible to postpone it for a year. they will not be able to do it today, society is still tolerant enough of certain manifestations of incomprehension, in which time

, in which place are you, with patience, i will say so delicately, yes, but we already see what is being said about corruption , society is sufficiently offended that it is such in such manifestations today, and so on and so on. the president feels the society absolutely, he is absolutely not interested in getting a classic ukrainian split between the state , which will be there separately, and between the society, which will be separate. no, it is not possible, it is impossible to win and therefore open declaration must be mandatory and there is no pause in this there is no point in a pause because please, if you have worked on something there, answer now and it will be right and it will be fair if we want to reach the end of the war well, if we don't we want, if we want to get an internal revolution of evolution towards us, the finale and we don't have any other than a positive finale with you, because you see what the russians are saying today, let's look at the key narratives in the framework of propaganda, they are clearly they say that ukraine must disappear, well, that is, they understand that

if they do not win the war in the sense that they wanted to win it and take total control of ukraine as such, then they themselves will no longer live, and this goes back to the moment of what will happen to the russian federation after war, returning to the declaration, there was such a new introduction that suggested that advisers of high-ranking positions of state officials also submit declarations of declarations and equate advisers with officials in this sense, you are an adviser, i will introduce there are no problems at all with this introduction, yes, i don’t see any problems at all in declaring everything i have and so on . what were my assets? they didn’t change during my work in the president’s office. within the framework of this war , they were located on the occupied territory, you submitted a statement because of the action. this is not my doing. yes, this is what my wife is doing, but i think that she will understand the legalities well. that is, you think that

this problem of history will have a positive ending. i i believe that the president clearly understands the state of society and he wants society to keep what it should receive, and in this case we say that it is absolutely impossible to isolate the state and make it separate because then everything will work inefficiently for the war, well, it is meant on ensuring the war, therefore , it will definitely be positively resolved, or the resolution of the problem with the grain corridor will be equally positive, this is another serious and painful point when our partners, for example, in poland now, because of our internal elections, there are a lot of nuances, and the export of grain through poland and several other countries is blocked, we rely on the black sea corridor, which is constantly under attack by the russians, specifically the port of izmail, they are methodically trying to destroy what our partners think about it and what the president's office is thinking of doing about it well, first of all , the president's office is always looking for alternative options, and yet we continue to work

to ensure that some of the grain and grain products of ukraine go to global markets. it is very important, and with regard to relations with partners, there are four countries of the european union, it is not only poland, it is slovakia, hungary and bulgaria , four countries, they have certain issues, but this issue of the negotiation process must be explained, because if we agreed , for example, that 15% of ukrainian grain will remain along the transit route, and the rest will enter the ports and then go somewhere in other countries or in a different way, even in the regions, then we must adhere to this, this is a matter of negotiation processes, i do not see a problem in us with our polish friends to date well, extremely chic relations in spite of everything yes, in spite of traditional historical nuances and so on, so i think that here we will come to some optimal solution, but regarding grain agreements in general, this is not an issue, even ukraine is an issue of the lack of international law as the same is also the question of the unwillingness of international

institutions to comply with international law, because when you have a country or a separate country under the name of the russian federation, it not only destroys control, but also destroys the commercial opportunity to work in the water area of the black sea and at the same time strikes at the port infrastructure of ukraine, the russians want to get the following, they want to remove a competitor from the global market, they want to get a higher price increase, they want to get an opportunity to bypass sanctions. that is, this will be the first bell. and we see that some people are working on this angles bell to bypass the sanctions then it will be possible to constantly say let's lift these sanctions they are not working very well anyway and the russians want to use this moment demonstratively they are doing it in order to remove these sanctions. yes, partially remove them. in this case, we are talking about agricultural sanctions , russian grain fertilizers , russian ship insurance, and so on, but this is a question of international communities. they like it when they kneel before the russian

federation. well, international communities in the person of the un are engaged in this blackmail. i am talking about this, and how can we now return to the theme of the un organization, we are returning to international politics with you again, but it already turns out that ukraine well, we can choose ukraine even what looks internal is a question of international politics now and the un is directly in the words of its secretary general gutiérrez declares that it is necessary to agree to russian blackmail and ukraine should think about something , not just agree to un blackmail officially says that the aggressor country has the right to kill and destroy people on a large scale in another country, this is how it sounds, you just have to call things. this is the problem. why the war can drag on because the un secretary general comes out and says very cool that russia is killing on a large scale and destroying grain

infrastructure. let's all kneel before them, let's let them continue to do it, first of all, because that's what it says, because if you allow irresponsible attitude towards the fact that you are destroying the infrastructure , that's right, and you're going to have the sanctions lifted, what will be your conclusion here. come on. let's destroy it because then i will lift more sanctions , more sanctions. in other words, this is a direct direct encouragement of the russian federation to commit genocide on the scale of uh, yes, fear of russia, well, that is, the historical one exists . historical truth, i think. i think that it is a little in to others, it is a lack of understanding of who you are and where you are. and what is the un? well, the un can be perceived as a lobby -type organization, a pr type, and so on, but it is not an organization that scrupulously reads its main documents and, based on them , behaves in one way or another with russian do you know what the problem is with the un today, because

russia has the right of veto, there are many other problems where russia uses this right in favor of one or another country and blackmails one or another country, we can block such a resolution , we can, on the contrary, unblock such a resolution support us, that is, don't activate something there about ukrainian and so on and so on . but it still seems to me that the root of this lies in the fear that russia will take something terrible, as they call it, and this fear of the russians doing something terrible. and the worst thing is nuclear weapons and forces people and our partners to agree with the fact that it is worth listening to the only moment, and if they will always feel this, then why will they listen to international law in the future? why will they not take everything by force and just be like that let's demarcate, give us that, give us the baltic countries, we'll be terrible, give us moldova , we'll be terrible, well, they'll behave like this