[000:00:00;00] and economic news was edited by oleksandr morshchyntsi. he talks about the economy during the war and new sports . evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for 2 hours in the company of his favorite presenters about culture during the war . he is ready to talk about culture during the war . mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us about some optimism, and we will also have a distinguished guest of the studio today , volodymyr grishko, if everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours, a big broadcast of vasyl zimi a project for intelligent and caring people in the nice evening, the rights of the people's deputies are illegal. and for this, too, there will be responsibility for the fact that they limited the rights of the executive power. and how did they limit the rights of the people's deputies who were elected by the people, who

should not be limited in their powers in any way, and now i i see that there is such an attack , including society, they submit to the verkhovna rada, if something is negative, we must talk about institutions. it must exist. it must exist . it must protect the interests of the state. well, you are talking about democracy, authoritarianism. i understand that for many people who criticize decisions related to mobilization, in principle, compulsion for military service, it is now almost like authoritarianism. well, they say that, for example , specially trained and motivated people should fight. no, this is the constitution of ukraine. why is the author tourism? we have an article in the constitution that says the connection of every citizen is the protection of the state, but authoritarianism is first of all well, there is the consultation of the authorities and there

. from the very beginning it was written when our constitution was adopted that this is a duty and especially for us . we don't have how many specially trained people to resist such an armada. 140 million, if i 'm not mistaken, the russian federation. and here is the question, when people say this, they automatically say that they should go there. those who want to go, and we are ready to lose this war. we don't have to lose and give up all efforts for this, but it is right , including everything we said before that. it should be open that life is much more expensive in our country, why are we dealing with technologies now? i always uh, when we came there with the units that worked there, 30 people destroyed 2011 pieces of equipment there, we have thousands of soldiers who did not destroy a single piece of equipment because, well, someone is there vstilug, well, i thought that it should be done like this, if one soldier destroyed

one piece of equipment, you have the right to one mobilization, because it will be such a motivation , if she says that everyone will destroy one by one in russia, there will simply be no such equipment left. asymmetric war it will lead to success one on one when you know it turned out uh we have one loss they have one loss they have one tank we have one tank we will never win like this this is the way when 30 people destroy 2011 vehicles 100 people destroy 1 000 units of equipment, this is the latest technology, this is when people stay safe , and there are artillery, drones, etc., we have the right, but we have the opportunity to win, but simply by military methods in a one-on-one war, simply on the battlefield, when exclusively military methods it is difficult and unlikely that extradition from abroad of evaders who managed to get abroad is realistic and so strong for ukraine, if i believe that these people

should be returned, and unequivocally, and especially there , those who gave is it possible to do it or is it possible to do it? well, this is probably international, er, international law, and here you need to, er, submit them to the wanted list, but for example, how do you understand if a person is somewhere in another country, he left the right way or left the wrong way, i don't know. it's difficult question and i want let's see how the government will implement the fact that from october 1, women who have obtained a medical degree will be registered for military registration, or can this list of specialties for registration for military registration be expanded for women ? accounting only according to one's desire, that's why we remember it was in society that women were not presented at the start, such a double

situation there, someone says that there should be equal rights, and someone says that, uh, we need such a law, and we remember that in society he created a great resonance. well, then it was adopted, and i don’t know if it can be expanded, it can be at all. but now i know that according to the law, it will be necessary to adopt another law, because now, according to the law, women only have exceptional specialties to the account, all the others according to their wishes, well, in general, then, in the continuation, i will ask if you allow that um in some future, considering how complicated this war is and that it is going on with such a large number of adversaries in ukraine , the formula itself may be mobilization revised that not only men but women will be drafted into the service. i hope that we as men will be able to protect the women of this country and make it so that they go to the front only according to their personal desire, the question is whether it is possible and possible, but i hope that

it will not come to this, that there will be enough men in this country, who, realizing what it might take, will take up arms and come to defend their country , mr. roman, i propose to put three dots here and we will monitor the development of the situation . thank you very much for this conversation. thank you for the chevrons that bring victory closer. independent ukraine was and will be because we are ukraine, no matter how they try to make us

quarrel , we are united so that they do not try to do to us. and continues to lose, we liberate from captivity those who stood up to defend the country and our future because a strong rear is the key to a strong army of inevitable victory and our independence and which we prove every day to build a place that will become the beginning of a state to christen it and protect it with a saber and mace so that to cherish her language despite the ban, to rebel , to fight for independence on the granite and on the maidan, to repel the enemies with the dignity of the great family , courage is needed national bank of ukraine, courage to be

ukrainians, what are we going to continue with our telethon, i will remind yevgenia harkov tetiana zhurakova and vlada sokolyuk works for you and -and we will start this information hour with the address of the president, which appeared just a few minutes ago, so let's listen. i wish you good health, dear ukrainians, the report for the day, the first law on electronic declaration as soon as this morning the voted law came from the verkhovna rada, signed the veto, i expect a new vote with a positive regarding the immediate opening of the register of declarations already in september , such a decision should be made. our negotiations with the european union regarding accession, a new historic step between ukraine and the eu should take place this year, and all branches

of state power in ukraine should work on this step before all other meetings. on this day, the military cabinet held, especially among the participants , they talked only about what is happening at the front now. the occupiers are preparing and what, accordingly, should our soldiers be ready for, the weighty decisions given are today the largest for the entire time of a full-scale war and already the 12th defense package, the volume of this new package more than 800 million dollars in content exactly what we agreed with mrs. prime minister mette frederikson and her government team a good reinforcement thank you for

it today i had a very productive conversation with students from universities in the netherlands it was a broad format several universities quite political the questions were really good attention to ukraine to our struggle for freedom and great hope that we will return peace to our entire land to all our people without exception. i am grateful to the netherlands and society and the political community and to you mark sir the prime minister personally for such sincere support of ukraine and for the faith in ukraine of our people and, of course, our soldiers, today we have something to thank all the soldiers of our 95th separate brigade, cheap, third assault brigade, well done guys , united assault brigade of the national police, rage, thank you all three brigades celebrated important successful actions of the 46th separate airmobile 47th

separate mechanized brigade from the battles in the bakhmut direction thank you soldiers for your forward movement 72nd separate mechanized brigade and 79th separate cheap thank you for the extremely the strong defense of our positions and i especially noted today the special units of the gur that carry out tasks in the area of ​​the tick and in other extremely hot spots. thank you , guys . glory to ukraine . so we heard the address of the president. about the veto on electronic declaration that he imposed so and now again he mentioned himself about the law .

programs of the ukrainian center for social development mr. and yaroslav ukraine glory to the heroes a-a please evaluate a-a the reaction of the president and the reaction of the society to the bill passed by the verkhovna rada on the electronic declaration so-called so er and about what else it said oh god, the society voted like this and demanded that the president impose a veto . what do you think this means? well , the society's reaction was completely expected , since the decision made by the verkhovna rada was somewhat half-hearted. on the one hand, to return the declaration, on the other hand, to leave them closed, and this was clearly a wrong step and a step that contradicts the democratic principles and standards , first of all, of the european union, and after the corresponding sufficiently active reaction of e-e society , including the format of the petition that was published on the president's website, the head of state seems to me to have made an absolutely

correct decision. and judging by everything, he proceeded from two main points. the first point is directly the reaction of citizens, and it is clear that the president paid attention to eh, since he is one of the key defenders of these rights, yes, he should have reacted , and the second point seems to me to be precisely related to our integration into the european union, and the president directly said about this that he would hold appropriate consultations and if those bodies directly in favor of this integration will say that this decision is not sufficient for us to receive approval from the european union regarding the obligations we have assumed, it must be saved in a lightning reaction the law just came from the verkhovna rada appeared immediately veto arguments from the president and i don’t see it now . let’s say you know the possibilities of the verkhovna rada and find some other way than not to vote for the law with the corresponding change, that is, to open the declarations and give

300 + votes for it. this will be a very correct position of the parliamentarians, it seems that it will remove all those issues and claims to a certain extent that society had in relation to people 's deputies, and i also want to add yes yes yes see what is there simply where what are the wishes regarding security issues and so on they don't actually have any under them facts why because well, by and large, if the russians, well, our enemy would like to know something and he would find out, and yes , the people's deputies in this regard , they should have demonstrated this publicity. and you know , it would be to some extent even symbolic, including and in the direction of our enemy, it is clear that military representatives of the special services are another absolute topic and it is not raised, they must be protected as much as possible, and in everything else one must take the correct position. i think that those deputies who initially did not a very correct choice well, they have thought about everything and now they will vote in accordance with their conscience and, importantly, public requests because

that is what they should do in principle , ah, we will talk about public requests now , but in your opinion, why did the deputies do not yes, as you said there in good conscience from the first time . it seems to me that those deputies who did not vote for this amendment are still a heterogeneous mass. they can be divided into several groups. they were probably openly there and those who were afraid that he might not be able to to explain the origin of certain funds or certain rates, it is possible, history, we do not know about it why, because, well, it is supposed to deal with the issue of anti-corruption, some bodies did not consider this issue to be fundamentally important, yes, they thought that we voted for the law as a whole, and the amendment is already well it is not as important as it may seem, in principle there were those who simply ignored the voting there. maybe they found some more important matters, but it seems to me that such a public reaction

should bring them down to the ground a little. they say yes and remind them that they should work as hard as possible, including the reaction of society to certain decisions, this will be correct, especially during the war . well, about public requests. sociologists, they asked ukrainians whether the president is responsible for corruption in the government and military administrations, let's listen to the results and discuss whether you agree with the statement that the president is directly responsible for corruption in the government, military administrations, almost 80% of respondents answered completely or rather agree, instead, they disagree with this statement, 18% of respondents voiced the option, it is difficult to say, but

i would like to ask you to rate this survey. is the president really responsible? this is an important question. it is very important to clarify. it concerns a specific field and the president appoints people to this field. there have indeed been corruption scandals recently, but i want to note here that it is important to clarify that these scandals, they had consequences, that is, it was not just some kind of information, but appropriate personnel decisions were kept from them, someone was removed from office and criminal cases were opened against someone, and so on. and it seems to me that the attention of society was focused on this topic in the first place because it is directly related to the defense of the country, and the issues are extremely sensitive in this context , well, the president is responsible even there according to the constitution, but politically , the responsibility is not about him

involvement in some corrupt activities and so on, this is a very important clarification, and it seems to me that this is again a certain signal to the authorities and the president in general that we need to look very carefully at such things, because we see that the topic of corruption is returning to our political discourse again there was a period when the war closed everything, now they are starting to talk about it again, and it is very important and correct to react to this signal, we saw the correct operational reaction, for example, to the history of declarations, these are actually related topics because many did not want to it is possible to open declarations due to the fear of accusations of some kind of corruption and so on , so the reaction is very fast and it seems to me that this is also the case with certain roads, what is not happening as it should be, what is the public demand. well, now from the authorities specifically from the president within the limits of his competence, because let's go to a parliamentary presidential republic, this is also a very important moment

. believe me, the attention of the citizens will be directed to the sphere of national security and defense for a very long period of time. well, we live in a state of war , and it is clear that we will pay a lot of attention to this. to choose to correct those errors that occur today in one or another process . by the way, eh, the game, but mykhailo podalyak, the adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine, joined us on the air today, and by the way, he also expressed his assessment of the results of the survey on the president's responsibility for corruption in the government, let's listen to this vote of democratic initiatives , for me it clearly says that people trust the president and believe that he should take more responsibility for, let's say, the deprivation of the country at this time, today under during the war from some or other

wild manifestations of looting or corruption, or in your opinion, or well, this is the assessment of mr. mykhailo a-a well, she understood, in your opinion, or, er, evaluate this evaluation, you can evaluate it, and how, in your opinion, react the authorities should react, what should be the conclusions from this? well, of course, there is a certain logic here , because due to objective and subjective reasons , the president is really the central figure today, first of all, he is the supreme commander, and it is clear that all positive and negative moments will go fly in his direction. let's say yes, and society will first of all demand certain decisions from him, especially in those areas that are related to his competence, and the area here is simply in the question, there it was discussed in general about the government, but i am convinced that the vast majority of citizens. well, of course, it is difficult to get into their heads, but when they answered this question, they meant first of all, for example , the ministry of defense, that is, here the president is the president . well, if by law he is not responsible for the entire government, he is

the responsible person is responsible for this conditionally. he offers candidates, it is possible for him to be responsible for several ministries, the entire ministry of defense, he is responsible for this. but i think that, in the background, in the background of what happened objective, i emphasize objective centralization, which is due to the war, it is clear that the president is the central in this regard, the figure and the address from the well is the political reality and to understand that in the future scandals that will arise, well , society's questions will also be asked of the president no that was appointed there, something like that happened, but in reality well, what is the problem, solve it and judging by the comments of ivan podolyak , they understand this problem and think how to solve it so that it is better when such

moments arise, society points out what is wrong is happening and we have the opportunity to correct it, yes, the constitutions do not even conduct such. and it is generally difficult to imagine that the representatives of the authorities react in any way to such polls. and we even have pork - there is time and there are opportunities to make the right decisions after that . igor, who joined . do you know the continuation of your words? that we will return freedom to the whole land and each of us will feel that it will be a ukraine of different rules, but we really want this ukraine of different rules . will consider the transfer of gripen fighters to ukraine already this thursday at the defense committee will also discuss

the issue of training ukrainian pilots on these planes this is reported by the swedish radio ecot with reference to their own sources according to the data, sweden has about 90 usable gripen aircraft, of which it can transfer to kyiv somewhere around 16-18 fighters , we attach valery romanenko, this is a leading researcher of the national aviation university, mr. valery, thanks to ukraine, thank you for joining. so, what can you say about the gripen in comparison, for example , let's take from those are the f16 that we regularly talk about with you and in comparison with what we have as of today, the drying mig and so on, in which class and where can

they be placed? well, gripen and f16 are airplanes of the same class, these are light, multi-purpose fighters, yes, well, let's say tactical fighters, yes, they are both with the same engine, and the difference is practically uh, regarding the weapon system , there is no difference, i would even say that uh, depending on the modification of the flu, it can be if the modifications there are the last ones there, the f modification, yes fj, they are already in terms of equipment, they are already better than the f-16, the ones we have to get, but i think that after all, if they give us, they will give the first modifications, which of course are a little inferior in terms of their onboard complex and equipment the f-16 is inferior to these ambm models that should be provided to us in general, uh, they destroy well, let's say, the gripen would be more convenient for us from the point of view of our airfields, well, that's all about the infrastructure, i wanted to ask you how much

we need to adapt or re-adapt it compared to those are the f16 well, all the mushrooms would be a little easier for us, but not much, all the same, these are fighters that are designed for smooth takeoffs. ah, if you compare them in terms of weapons, they are actually the same weapons systems, ah, the only thing is that the gripen takes less, it has fewer suspension nodes, and it takes 2 tons less combat load. in general, it is easier to use and easier to maintain . we need to somehow synchronize them with ours

, i mean, not only the runway, but with our systems. and what are the radii of the navigation systems? do you need any? in this regard , synchronization will suit green as well. and the main thing is that the fortress is let’s say this is our plan b gripe eh, its standard armament includes storm missiles shadow skype well, obviously taurus too if we get them , that is, if we run out of harrows by god , the su-24 and the carriers of these missiles are today’s, then we have gripes will be a great replacement for this aircraft, because the f16 will need to be slightly modified so that they can carry these same missiles, if you compare yes, you were able to compare the 29 and the su-27, well, the difference is the same as the z16 - this

has been discussed 100 times, that is, it is a weapon of the past. the weapons of the past age are understood here by the way, russia wants to receive four new tusu-160m aircraft by the end of the year, and with them the russian military will launch missile strikes on ukraine. of military transport aircraft il-16 76 p valery ot v what can you say about this type of aircraft how important is each unit for the russians and how harmful can it be for us ukrainians ? it worked in pskov, yes. it’s true that there were old models, but they burn normally. in sand, they burn, so then

to demolish them with a winch means, er, to carry away the remains of it in buckets, but the new models are, unfortunately, good. the range has been increased by one and a half times, the carrying capacity has been changed, all systems have been changed, but this is a military transport plane that does not pose any threat to us, except for the logistical one, so to speak , but here is the 160th. and if the russians put four planes into operation, as they say, because it безподченные хотелки in russian, yes, they introduced the first aircraft of this type almost four years ago, and it was made from soviet reserves, which means that the ones that are now at the factory seem to be produced, i am not sure, so these planes are at the factory and they are without equipment there

without a row of the systems are actually the planers on the chassis are standing and not even all of these not all six are in this condition i even just the fuselages are standing alone well, and in order to lead them into your well you have to put a lot of effort and money the main thing is if they lead four more, then russia will have as many as 21 bombers of this type, do you understand what a terrible number now ? well, the americans, for example, built a suitable b1, something there. about a hundred planes means ah, about whether they use uh for strikes on ukraine is minimal. practically all launches are carried out, but right now the catapult turret from this plane is working, which drops missiles , they are there. like on a drum, there are 5 missiles and they

roll over, well, five, five, the khas-101 turns and one is dumped means e as for the application, the old bombers are mainly used here 95ms, which carry these missiles on the external suspension. as i understand it, they are just stupidly finished off, it is obtained, they are extracted, they are finished off, their resource is understood, and valery, i thank you very much for such a thorough analysis and explanation of what we we can get what russia can get er valery romanenko, a leading scientist, a worker of the national aviation university was in touch with us. well , the russians invented a new shelter for their warplanes in case of attacks ukrainian drones, you know that as a diversion to this topic about planes, as