[000:00:00;00] it's just that if you own the entire situation in the state, then you are somehow responsible for everything because, as they said in the 19th year , how many more than 200 deputies passed to the verkhovna rada with one passport, volodymyr zelenskyi, so here, in principle, i i don't understand why there is such a stormy discussion about the president's responsibility because well, how can it be in a state where you control all branches of government and manage all branches of government? did you mention, did you mention ms. lesya, about the next elections that will be held in 2024 zelensky recently gave an interview and said that under the conditions in ukraine , he will not be able to leave ukraine. if suddenly the elections are held in the 24th year and he will run again for the presidency, well

, at least that is the context and it should be understood as much as it is the probability that elections in ukraine may take place, for example, at the end of the 24th year, i will return to the topic of corruption in just one sentence, really , absolutely serhiy, you are right about the fact that responsibility is fashionable in the 19th year, when volodymyr zelenskyi and his team they said that early parliamentary elections are necessary in order to have the opportunity to make changes and for this we need to renew the parliament, then they told him that it's ok, but then the responsibility will be exclusively on one team, and that's understandable, but i think that this causes such a resonance inside ukraine, not because there is no understanding of conditional responsibility there, because for some reason they believe that this topic allegedly plays along with those political forces who want to say, “what do you see in

ukraine, there is a high level of corruption, that’s why we don’t we can provide more help there, but i don't think so and i think that on the contrary it is better to talk about these topics now and if there are such fears in the west, then you can't pretend that they don't exist, and on the contrary, you shouldn't be afraid to say that yes, we have problems, we are post-soviet country, but we do the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, we react to it, and then it will be right. well, now returning to the question about the elections. well, i think that a lot will depend on what our situation will be at the front, that is, whether we will have victories and what will be the victories because it is clear that on the wave of military victories, well, if there could be such an auspicious moment for the authorities , if volodymyr zelensky is thinking about a second term, then it is clear that it will be

an auspicious moment, but if the war will bring such a well if the stalemate is long enough and this war will already be long and internal problems within society will be felt, then it is not a fact that the authorities will be interested in the elections , that is, here, after all, i think that the team has volodymyr zelenskyi, today there is no clear answer about the expediency of holding elections because it is clear that at the moment there is no competition. well, as such, we know that the informational component is limited in our country due to the war and is still dominated by e- is an agenda that concerns security and simply on this background, well, if elections were to be held, this could precisely characterize the government, which can put

, for example, its interest and have the opportunity to be re-elected now over there security challenges, so i think that there are no of volodymyr zelenskyi's team, a clear answer if there is an understanding that there is some kind of favorable period when you can be re-elected, but after all, the security challenges are significant , so i think that everything will depend directly on the military component and the security component, so i think that the decision on today, i repeat, there is no lack of elections and monopolization of the media market, well, especially the television market, we know that the tv pool is the only telethon that is actually managed from one center and provides information about what is happening in the state and the majority of ukrainian citizens are obviously already switching to alternative sources of information, in particular to the espresso tv channel, because our rating continues to grow

thanks to the way the single telethon works, but the absence of these elections, the monopolization of the media, of course, the concentration of power and management during the war, what challenges in the internal politics of ukraine we we will face after our victory over russia, when there will be elections, that is, what awaits us, taking into account all these factors well, i still would not exaggerate the risks that concern monopolization of the concentration of power or lack of competition because, after all, ukraine is, well, if it has a tradition of political competition, we still have a tradition of free elections, and in this sense it is impossible to change it. it seems to me that after all, if we talk about the risk is that it is about the fact that for politicians all these old

practices that existed before, i think that these practices are not working, this also applies to populism, and it all applies to the logic of accusations and excuses that are very often used by political opponents, that is, someone someone accuses, excuses himself, and they can change places, that the government, that the opposition, depending on the ratings, and i think that there would be prospects for those political forces that will have a vision and that will not just throw around populist slogans or that will exclusively blame each other , those who have a vision and it is as concrete as possible. for example, if we are talking about foreign policy or internal transformations, that is, absolutely, that it should be

, well, if terminologically, even concrete character. i think that such political forces or politicians can be perceived in a new way. and the risks are that we, understanding what if we talk about the country, the risks about citizens, then it consists in the fact that, understanding that the security component and the external are currently dominant because we are defending ourselves from external aggression , but there are many risks in that we may lose the momentum and momentum of internal transformations. and it would be very good if this external momentum , yes. if the same regime was included in the internal transformations of the transformation and the implementation of the same changes that are foreseen by our candidate for membership of the european union, but there are fears that

because of the war there and because of the fears and attempts of politicians to fall into these old practices being afraid to communicate honestly, discuss, discuss, what can we just lose this time, which we could use to significantly strengthen and do everything to strengthen within the country, after all, no one canceled a court case reform, neither fiscal reform nor reform of the management system, because now everything is happening with us, well, in fact, according to the law, but also before the tenders. i also have big questions about how it all happened, but all these problems do not disappear anywhere, and i would not like it if we talk about risks to we simply did not use this time, including for important internal changes and transformation, in this i see a risk if we are talking about the country and

citizens. well, there is obviously a risk that the current team is so diverse and sometimes says quite different things in public so that later you have to explain something, such as the adviser to the office of the president of ukraine mykhailo podolyak, who said that the intellectual level of india and china is quite low and they cannot calculate their future there. i suggest watching this fragment separately because it is magical, just what is the problem of india and china and so on, the problem with the text is that they do not analyze the consequences of their own steps, the weak intellectual potential of these countries unfortunately, yes, they invest in science , yes, india sent a spacecraft today is already traveling on the surface of the moon, but this does not mean that this country understands exactly what the modern world is like. these countries

are making money today on this war . they are effectively making money in the same way as the turkish republic . over the intelligence of those who live in india or china when they launch into satellites and we, in principle, cannot master a normal rocket program and create rockets that flew to moscow well, it also seems to it's funny on the one hand and on the other hand the representatives of india and china are outraged because this is the official spokesman of the office of the president of ukraine, they cannot understand, well, how can this be , that is, that ukraine , it is clear that india and china are the countries that benefit from the war some kind of profile, but they can't understand why they need podolyak. what do you think, what do they need podolyak? well, actually, i think that podolyak is something else, but he

said the way he said it . to be the government is interested, well, when it is there, let's say in democratic countries where there are elections and so on, and the government is interested in the native enlightenment , or whatever, if it is higher, the more carefully its own citizens approach the choice in countries that, well, may have certain tendencies there. well, maybe it is not so works, but this does not mean that it is necessary to formulate that someone has a low intellectual potential . that is, it was incorrectly said. conditions of war when we compete for the same countries that continue economic cooperation with russia and this includes india and china in particular, but we compete for the attention of these countries and

the west similarly, if we talk about india and china , an ambassador has already appeared in our country and we also support some points from china's peace plan, therefore, in such conditions , it is necessary to approach every word and every wording very carefully. if this is a command of the authorities, then i think that here it should, well, if some clear line were to be drawn, and it should because it comes from professional specialized departments, in particular, from the ministry of foreign affairs and to these, well, if professional specialized positions should take them into account, well, in their comments to the interview, probably all those who are related to the president's team and those who can comment on it, that's why here you just have to be very careful, because even if you take away the words about the intellectual level there and just take it as a fact that is true, china, india have

economic relations with russia, they do not support sanctions, but still we must treat these countries with the same attention that the ministry of foreign affairs does, but all the others, well, if the official advisers there are spokespeople , they should take this position into account and simply be as careful as possible with their words , so here i think that, well, it's just that podolyak decided to comment so freely, although he probably meant something else, but he said it the way he said it, well, that is me. i repeat once again, you have to be very careful and exacting with your words, and by the way, the war would stop this trend when everyone who wants to is in the ruling team commented regardless of authority and there, well, if for a while i gave, well, if this equilibrium appeared and it is very important that this equilibrium , when the relevant department deals with the sphere

of responsibility, that it last perfectly. now they are watching us live on youtube , please vote in our poll today we ask you about whether ukraine needs diplomatic relations with belarus now yes no and your option please write in the comments, put your favorite this video is a must for it to be trending on youtube well, further on, we are in touch with yaroslav lysenko, junior lieutenant of the third battalion of the operational assignment svoboda, part of the rapid response brigade of the national guard of ukraine, border line , lieutenants. i congratulate you, i would like to see you in our to the ether thanks to each other for advice and good evening good evening tonight the military counter-intelligence of the sbu and the navy of ukraine conducted a unique special operation near yevpatoria

, the air defense complex was destroyed triumph, the cost of 1 billion 200 million dollars, this is the third time already during this program, i remember it, and the joy is simply bursting from our defense forces and fighters who carry out similar special operations. does this mean that we are moving to a completely different phase of the war with russia when planes are used that launch missiles over crimea, there are cruise missiles that are used during the de-occupation of the peninsula, as the situation that is currently developing around the peninsula affects the eastern front and the southern front because we are concentrating on the fact that there is cotton in sevastopol near yevpatoria, but obviously it is necessary to look more broadly at the entire front line. and it is quite large in our country. thank you for the

very interesting question. first of all, for us, for all of crimea, it is like news from the future. then we still have to get to dzhankoy, then to bakhchisaray, and then to sevastopol , and when we hear that we already have success there, and success that really works, it's really very important , because these systems, let everyone understand, are artificial. i don't know how much they were produced in russia in russia, but i think there are no more than 10 pieces of them are now being put into service in the russian navy, so the destruction of the submarine as well as the large amphibious ships, this means one thing that we have a deeply worked out and intellectual plan for moving forward. i think we will bring order to all the bays where the ships are now

chechnya, have they somehow misbehaved and will be hit by our missiles, or rather not ours? i think it is the shadow storm launched from our planes, but after all, they are already ours and work for us, and then there will be, i think, a very big problem the blowing up of the crimean bridge and a very decisive breakthrough, and everything according to our scenario, panic, agony, everything, as the russians like it, they expect it, they will endure it, they know what it can be, morally, they are already ready, i said a long time ago, back in the spring, that morally, they are ready to retreat just to us they wanted it to be simple and all large-scale like a year ago in kharkiv oblast and recently very recently in kherson oblast well, it probably doesn't work out like that

therefore, the great joy of our intelligence, our planes, our pilots, and especially all those who supply us with this equipment. i would like to mention once again, unfortunately , there is also sadness in this, because we would like more of all this. i will remind you that during the landing on the second world war only sudibekners, which were based on the then famous katyushas in quotation marks, more than three hundred and sixty thousand were delivered, i don't remember how many tanks there are, 14 or 16,000, but these are incompatible numbers that we are now receiving, which are delaying our victory and cannot save lives our soldiers because at the front you understand now the best seminars what is happening now on the eastern front where are you now because today such rather strange information appeared from the deputy minister of defense hanna malyar about the release of andriyuka in the direction of bakhmut, then a refutation from the third separate assault unit

brigades, that is, the authorities say that you should believe the official information, that it is correct and the only correct one even during the war . it is probably correct, but in this situation with andriemka, nothing at all is clear that what is happening right now in that part of the front where you are now, if it is possible to say, part of our unit is located a little bit not near kurdyum, which we fought near, about 5-6 months ago, when the enemy had offensive actions on bakhmut , now part of our unit is located to the north of bakhmut but i will say your words between your words. perhaps this is why it is necessary to discuss, uh, they took that settlement or do we still need a day or two? well, i wouldn't object to that . let it be as it will be, well, look at the same place. this is the situation, kurdyubivka, i have personally been there many times and zelenopillia is there, you can

cross it. well, in 15 minutes, but i would add these 15 minutes and these 1.5 km to the pumping station, this is the life of many, many guys. she can go back there two times today. yes and tomorrow it can be returned to us, we will conditionally consider that andriivka is already ours, it is a key node, it is a really important point for us to move forward, but if the guys from the third assault brigade say that we have to wait a little longer, then they know because they have been there for the last month. the ukrainian defense forces reported that the russians are concentrating in the kupyan direction there, er, 100,000 er, more than 100,000 russian occupiers have gathered, what do you think this concentration of troops can remain, well, look at the sriblyan forest, the direction of the estuary

and kupyansk, er, about a month or four ago, when we again entered these positions, we were told that there were really about 100,000 concentrated there. already we check the information and don’t believe in us doing our job anyway, it turned out that this is true , there were a very large number of tanks there, 800 or 900, and there were some problems, and we lost a small, even not a small number of villages, probably one village for some two or three weeks then they were taken back, and the specifics are very interesting, forests are almost everywhere, there are many lakes in the swampy area, there is a spill of the seversky donets well, what can be said about today's honey , with confidence, the enemy did not manage to do anything

in that direction, he was hit very hard in the teeth we have strengthened our positions, our armed forces, and other units that are fighting have strengthened our positions with very powerful units , everything has stabilized there, everything is under our control . everything is normal in that direction , and now there remains a very tense situation . from the south, but there is no crisis situation, that’s for sure. well, the new york times reports that russia has bypassed technological sanctions, produces more missiles than before the large-scale war, according to american officials, russia was forced to dramatically slow down the production of another missile weapons for six months from the beginning of the full-scale invasion, but at the end of the 22nd year, the russian anti-tank missile defense began to gain momentum again , is it felt because of how the russian occupiers use these weapons , that is, do you feel that they have more missiles, more shells, more weapons,

it is clear that the number of planes was not equal in russia and ukraine, but still, is it felt at the front that russia has launched this flywheel of its military-industrial complex, i would like to say first that russia has always distinguished itself by the fact that it makes low-quality we have seen unexploded ammunition of any caliber and starting with 122 mm projectiles with inscriptions of the 23rd year. as for the sanctions , i am not funny about them. i feel that there was some sincerity in the acceptance of these measures by the western countries as our partners, but when ordinary citizens send out video cars from the port cities of poland, where the 23rd year marked aluminum from russia stands right up to the horizon, well, this

says that someone is deceiving someone or they are not following, although it is strange from the side of the united states and the united kingdom not to control these things, well, the same goes for spare parts and the adjustment of the production of shells and electronics, and to shaheds, and to everything in the world. well, there are other countries there, i won’t name them. maybe they are friendly or sympathetic to us, who also sympathize or make the same money. let’s name also our southern neighbor, a very large and powerful one, which is a member of nato, which has increased the turnover of goods, well, i was just ashamed to look at the dear mr. erdogan, what a pressure on the hand of a person who killed more than a thousand children here, ruined many hundreds of thousands of families parted, admitted from the country, you are pressuring him and says that i am glad that our

turnover has reached 8400 billion somewhere , it is that they are trading and everything is fine with them. because if you say that you are a friend of ukraine, you must be a friend of ukraine, not like this and here and there, and even more so, it does not just apply to grain or ammonia or some fertilizers. as with the leader of north korea this shame and guilt all my life, i don't understand how the turkish people look at this, well, the turkish people, what we ukrainians have experienced is very sympathetic, very helpful to the ukrainian refugees , of whom there are less than 350,000, but there are also about five million russians there at the same time, which makes me a fighter as a warrior, it is very surprising that the western world and especially nato should pay attention to such countries , well, the same is true not only about turkey, i think there are many

other countries that willingly sold twice as much e-e electronic for twice the price of electronics from which now e-e gauges are made e shahedis and so on and including and and became and everything in the world well, we also have examples of our partners who during the second world war very willingly traded with hitler's germany and then said that, well, i'm sorry, and then they said that they support neutral status well, as i say, the situation should have been controlled not by the ukrainian governments , but by the ukrainian people, because we are here now in the arms of war, and our western partners, who should understand whether they completely shut off the water in this apartment, i am talking about russia, about the financial, about the possibility of purchasing it

the latest technologies or is it done for a tick and to be and it remains only on paper and they are increasing the production of alcohol weapons, you already mentioned north korea yesterday, putin met with whom , in what manner, in what manner did he raise the toz for putin and for russia to win in in this war , today the head of the gur of the ministry of defense of ukraine, budanov, said that the dprk began to supply the russian federation with ammunition, these are 122 mm and 152 mm shells, as well as rockets up to hail, a month and a half ago. what do you think? will north korea decide what kind of men this, uh, projectile hunger, which is obviously in russia, well, it can provide. i think for a certain period , probably someone there considered as analysts that if they give everything, everything they have, but we

must understand that it is made up of 55-65 years, and gunpowder is not the kind of thing that can be stored for millions of years, it clumps , well, there is a specific thing, after all, it must be stored very responsibly , and i am not sure that there will be more than 45% of the shells that can be used that is, you can push them in there will be a cannon, but how they will shoot is another question, plus, korea . as far as i understand, the license itself has factories and produces the same projectiles, that is, they can be their own, but the question arises: what well, for example, many hunters switch to e- western standards, because more than one factory in russia cannot consistently produce high-quality products that will not give false positives, that will shoot accurately, respond to the mass of gunpowder on the very bullet, and so on, so there is also

such a question here, everything that is produced for russian the cannon may or may not fire shells in korea at all. well, we hope for that, but here they have such risks, but to continue the escalation , to release many thousands at us now, well, this is the only correct decision. here the question arises . why did the chinese allow everything, because we understand what is north korea is not quite independent in this regard. although it has nuclear weapons, and i think they still advise it with a great friend who to some extent allows to exist on the planet earth, and therefore it is probably china's decision, so we must understand that no one can deliver it himself. and even through korea, he can deliver the warning himself, so