[000:00:00;00] only in ukraine is there such lethargy of the united nations organization, and on the other hand, when the month of september comes, i apologize for the word, every year, everyone flies there and like something for honey, and it is impossible to restrain them. to make this organization more effective, it is necessary to disband it and come up with something else, why can something else push something out of us, and every time the criticism comes from those who were offended at the time at the un, they were offended in the balkans very often in africa in the same rwandan ay-ay-ay and where are the forces of the un uh-uh when one nation kills another it's just a genocide and now in ukraine we all say where is the un and it's right and fair that as soon as somewhere there is a war then it is

needed and why is it the same is not needed, as in september everyone went there. well, first of all, we have to understand that the un is a platform and zelensky is not going there for the sake of the un exactly, but primarily because there is a meeting planned there on the sidelines of the visit with the president of the united states, joe biden, namely tons, it is, as it were, just such an institutional background for this phenomenon, at the same time ukraine, in fact, the united states, israel, and many other states are regular criminals , because, in fact, the very design of this international organization, i.e. , the logic with which it was formed and what it did later, how it causes complaints, to put it mildly, is that the un was formed according to as you know, international organizations were formed with the logic that this organization is primarily a state that has a common interest with those close to them

. that is, nato is there, it is the organization of the warsaw pact, it is the european union, and the un has there is a fundamentally different logic there. all different parties, different poles, should sit at the table. this is such an interesting, but absolutely ineffective tool that soviet and american and british politicians once invented at the end of the second world war in order to protect the world from further global conflicts. that is, it is like this. the league of nations plus, in fact, a little work has been done on errors, but the logic itself is that all states must be present there , that is, both the states of the communist bloc and the states of the western bloc, as well as states authoritarian, totalitarian, such states, democratic, modern, etc. er, this, conditionally speaking, makes the un ineffective, because if

there is at least some kind of consensus, some kind of requirement for the consensus of decisions, so that they are not made by one of the largest states and by a difficult majority of votes in all cases. and what is there there is some kind of security council, etc., where different players are included, this is what makes this institution absolutely untenable, because in all the major conflicts that took place in the world, one way or another, the interests of one of these global players were affected somewhere, the usa, somewhere china somewhere in russia, somewhere in accordance with britain , somewhere else in japan, and it turns out. so it is impossible to solve any of the problems of a really large scale with the help of such a tool, because it supposedly has to satisfy everyone at the same time . yes, i understand. i just have a slightly different logic, well, it is close to yours, i just think organizations were created and there would be, with the consent of all parties of all states, such five gendarmes, these five gendarmes, if

it was planned that they are so big, powerful , strong, nuclear, what will they be able to say with my finger ai-ai-ai and all the rest of the countries will say ok. we understand, we are not at war anymore, or at least it will be wars where such ersatz wars are not directly involved in vietnam, but as if there are no russians there. well, the soviets are there or there or some other there angola is no no no no no soviet akubyn troops there if it was always like this excuse it's not us i'm not like that i'm waiting for a tram and now one of the gendarmes started a war that is, the very basis, the very platform, the very foundation of all this, he simply no longer means well, a little. i need something third the world war must be like after the first league of nations after the second un , and there must be a third one so that something so

radically changed and something else is invented by mankind please tell me, but the fact is that five gendarmes usually end up on different sides that is, we regularly see wars in which, for example, authoritarian states support some bashar alasad there, and more and more, by the way, this support is really less and less hidden, and western states support some other political regimes, that is, unfortunately, this is the model of general consensus. in general, such international organizations are excessively idealistic and an alternative paradigm - this is realism, that is, basing international politics primarily on the interests of specific states on some principles related to national sovereignty and the interests of these states. if there are international organizations, then they should accordingly follow those to those who are included there and to those who founded these international organizations to

those who are involved in them and when it comes to this is such an abstract goal of the style of the league of nations , the world oh, we understand that it is impossible reach the consensus of all players, let's all calm down, let's all forever sign some abstraction of eternal absolute peace, because this is not the first attempt of humanity to do this and it always ended anyway in some large-scale wartime, simply because of the fact that here is the development of each of these individual large players, he goes at different paces, they saw that somewhere over there the british empire has weakened , which means we are trying to take away colonies from it, they saw that germany has grown somewhere , so it means that russia is picking up some forces he sees that here it seems that the west is weakening its influence on some countries of the world, which means that we are pursuing an aggressive policy, and these constant changes are actually bringing us back to the model that the world is still more comfortable with one

global force with a centralized one that is the carrier there are certain principles that will be understood by the majority of the world, at least what to implement, but otherwise, it turns out that they held on, who remains between different lights , yes, or here is a whale, and yes, they are all different. there is only less and less stability, mr. ruslan but this is how we listen to you and we draw the conclusion that there will be two uns and this is simply, well, this is the only way if the world would exist, that is, there will be a un where principles will rule and there will be a un where the government will rule, you asked alyas yes, i do n’t care in principle i want power putin i don't care in the end i want power and the chinese communist party doesn't care in principle we want power and america, which also wants power

, obviously but according to various circumstances , it is forced to think about principles because every day, every 4 years, the parliaments, the president, and so on and the like, and so on and so forth, and it has grown so much that it is already necessary to think about principles in germany and in britain and already and now poland and ukraine are joining these countries and other countries they need power, they don't care about all kinds of principles, they will be some, some, some, some, some, some, some, some , ghost, some kind of ghost. we are not because we want power, but because the people of bandera are in kyiv, that's why we are fighting. and we don't need power it at least hints er putin ie what do you think about realna according to your words, reform is impossible because the interests of everyone are different, it is necessary to either create two uns or leave this one as a really platform for just hanging out, coming to talk, seeing

, hearing, and so on. well, de facto, he has already been reduced to this function, that is, de facto in this second paradigm, all the places where the state wants to unite and cooperate with those who are really close to them, they are already created outside the un because there are too many. on the other side, there are brics. there are also other regional associations there, the north american trade association is quite powerful, canada the usa, mexico, and west-french, and west-african . i'm sorry, but this is a condition according to freud, that is, when the state wants to unite and become stronger, they do not unite with those who, first of all, contradict their interests, violate their principles , worldview, convictions, and what the un still exists, it's more like that, you know, they found a niche for themselves. this niche is like that. it's a

kind of illusory diplomacy. it's somewhat veiled in different terms when states actually do what's beneficial to them, and then they simply appeal to of some values ​​and international law, just trying to pull a rubber band of some kind. so, how did the russian federation invent this nonsense about nazism for some reason, racism , including in ukraine, various plutocracies were registered there, that it all condensed in colors and, deriving from this , simply committed aggression, of course, as in the 16th century, the 20th century, the act of seizing foreign territory , the extermination of the population, the seizure of property and resources, so that is, this whole rhetoric is so based on the idealistic considerations of the world yes, about the fact that the world is not actually divided and that something supposedly unites it. she always resists the fact that the things that unite the world. this is how the masons interrupted our

little bell for themselves. yes, but you can see that they have corrected themselves, you made a remark to them freemasons immediately retreat and resist, these are all the things that unite all people there, both authoritarian and democratic, and those who live in distant tribes of some kind and those who live in megacities . ajendu that is, this non-mobilizing phenomena, a phenomenon. these are just biological facts, there are some psychological facts, only a little cultural . and this is what russia is speculating about. she has been starting her aggressive actions since the 14th year and earlier with a great awareness of the ineffectiveness of various international resources, the ineffectiveness of various international mechanisms. your question, slava, this may be the last question or one of the last, and it is possible that a world civil war will open, well, that is

, the citizens of the world will start to council among themselves, when there were these gendarmes, it somehow happened it is clear how it works, now we see the sahal, where coup after coup is uh, south of the sahara yes, there are states and french and afro-french, let’s say where the simple old ones are no longer affected much , the combined pants are also fleeing in all directions and in general that’s the kind of isolationism it is already can lead to war, moreover, i will tell you that ukrainians very often become isolationists , what i mean is when you start talking about the future of russia. russia is interested in what's there, let it be on them. what's wrong with them, let them beat each other on the head with some big axes, and that's also as if well, if we don't

come to an agreement, we 're all not ukraine with russia. what is the denominator, it will continue forever america with someone there with someone well only in europe they managed and well nato actually managed to manage the north atlantic what do you say really is this is the problem that our people are in a certain way leveling the value of such geopolitical opinion, you know, because if there were not all e groups of the main russian authorities and putin and those who are against him imitating good russians. they have some kind of vision for ukraine and how it should be, unfortunately, and this vision can be anti-human , satanic or hypocritical, but they do not want to bind us, such freemasons have crept in somewhere

into our peaceful existence. well, let's do it right then. i understand that we will go on advertising and then continue, so no , well, i have to continue the program, and not continue with mr. yaroslav bozhko. excuse me, please , head of the center for political studies, but something happened, our connection was interrupted. that's why now the commercial will start. and after the commercial, we'll talk about ukrainian armored vehicles like this, but from the first commercial, the stairs can't walk , wait, there's no health. what kind of health is there for our ten, i thought so, until i tried gerovital gerovital plus phytovi, a vitamin complex that cares for the heart and strengthens the body gerovital plus good well-being active life buy with a 15% discount gerovital plus 700 ml in pharmacies pharmacy nts pharmacy

penny and pharmacy shar ukrainians romanticize freedom this is how it happened in our tradition volya freedom is like air, something that you can't touch, but without it you can't breathe, and on the one hand, it's really like the classics, because it's not a zloty, comparing all the gold against freedom, it's just a swamp, but only now, when they try to conquer us again metaphorically and literally when they try to seize or destroy only now did the understanding come freedom has a price and its excessive

juice must be paid for and we pay with you vitaliy portnikov and we will discuss the main events of this week vitaliy portnikov and top experts about the brightest events for the last seven days, our guest will be the generator of companion forces, the national security adviser of the president of the united states, donald trump, herbert mcmaster, current topics, pressing questions, authoritative comments and forecasts in the project, an informational marathon with vitaly portnikov every sunday at 20:10 on

espresso, this is the 23rd separate rifle battalion of the armed forces of ukraine now we were already in such a significant salient. and in fact, at the very edge of this salient, we are holding the defense, the battalion is wedged in the defense of the orks in donetsk region and is holding positions right now, the military needs our help, the fighters need drones to conduct reconnaissance and destroy the enemy, even on the approach, we take the pod every drone is the loss of the enemy and the saved life of our soldier, join the gathering , we will show our fighters that we are with them , our program continues. come on, it will last at least another hour and 10 minutes even 13 but as i promised the general director of ukrainian armored vehicles vladislav belbas now we will see him good health mr. vladislav, thank you for finding time for us, it will be

a difficult conversation in the sense that i will have to i guess you are always engaged in interpretation, because the army, war, factories for the production of money, finance, you understand this. i understand that more than 5% of the rest of the ukrainians do not understand anything at all, let's start with this lebbez, someday, the elimination of illiteracy, the greens invented this 100 years ago more. look, when in america there is a question about procurement, yes for ukraine , for example, chi budyak yes, the pentagon has a budget, the congress accepts the budget, the pentagon receives money and tells the private company lockheed to make us planes or private ones boeing companies, make us helicopters, and it is absolutely clear: the state budget , private enterprises, and the money goes from taxpayers to these enterprises, everything is fine in ukraine, there are private military companies, there are state military companies, and here

we have to figure out how the financing is done, i don’t i can understand from you. as far as i understand you, a private company, yes , ukrainian armored vehicles means that you understand, they say to you we have money , we pay you, you do to us, i don't know what i don't want know and don't tell anyone, because the enemy will invade , on the other hand, there is some state defense company that is also ordered by the state, and then a huge question arises . something then the question arises and how do people there earn a salary, they do something, you can’t be like that the state has put pockets in the pocket and a and those companies

have to buy iron and pay salaries to pay for gas, light and electricity and so on and the like. i don't understand this. how did i come to the bazaar? i took uah 10 for something , but i didn't give uah 10, but i took the egg. well, if it costs uah 10, i don't know. and how are you doing? well, that's all, i myself, the event took place, i held out my hand, i'll hold out my other hand, i took the money, it's true, what did i put in my pocket, how about you, i don't understand, please explain. thank you for your interest , first of all, in this matter, see the mechanism of cooperation with by state customers, what by private, what by state enterprises are absolutely the same and the principles of calculating the cost of e-e and e-e of the cost of supply both during production and supply by import are absolutely the same

, i.e. e-e cooperation of private business and e-e state enterprises is absolutely similar and identical e-e according to the information from open sources, for example, the majority of state defense orders in 2014-15 were executed by state-owned enterprises with a state-owned form of enterprise , about 30% were executed by private companies, 70% in 2014-2015, and vice versa everything happened, and it is indicated that the private enterprise fulfills more defense orders than the state ones, is it normal in principle, as for the example of the usa, as you said, there are no public companies there at all, and the interaction of the ministry of defense of the national guard with any

from manufacturers to suppliers to service providers eh absolutely one to one is the same here the question arises that the mechanism that existed exists it has been working for a long time eh it was changed eh according to the law on defense procurement in 2020-21 but it with applied to everyone and now well, here is a scandal, i will say for the audience that there is a scandal here, some kind of resolution of the cabinet a month after the invasion er, it means that er companies , the supplier and the ministry of defense did not have the right to include profit in the price of the product because the profit in the text the resolution is not mentioned in any way, that is, you can’t have a profit, you can’t, you have to do everything

, bring, give money, don’t get it, and so on, do something , it’s true, it’s not known for what money, and so on , there is so much, but what’s in what’s the conflict, what’s this this brawl began, the quarrel began with that , and this was stated by the minister of defense of ukraine in his interviews about the fact that during the inspection of the activities of the ministry of defense , the state service wrote in its conclusion that more than 2.5 billion uah were paid as the profit of the suppliers of the ministry of defense here, in general, the suppliers of all service providers of product suppliers as losses of the state budget well, because according to the law on defense procurement

, the supply procedure has changed, the mechanism has changed supply and for the implementation of the law, by-laws were adopted , including resolution of the cabinet of ministers 363, which determined that when supplying these e-e products of their own production in ukraine, companies can e-e invest the cost of the products , a profit of 1% on purchased so-called components and three- to 30% 30% for works of own production and 3% when supplied by import, e-e profit can be obtained by both private and state, that is, these percentages are the same for everyone, what is the problem when checking the activities of the ministry of defense of the state the civil service came to the conclusion. and i will say a little more about these percentages. for example, we now know that, for example, drones are actively developing. according to a separate resolution of the cabinet of ministers, for example, for

the supply of drones, the supplier can estimate 25% of the profit, that is, much more than us the fact that we are now talking about 3% when supplied by imports, and the state civil service calculated that uh, all these profits are losses due to the fact that it took one of the resolutions of the cabinet of ministers, and the cabinet the ministers really in 2022 in march , having quickly reacted to the invasion, led to a little simplification of the supply procedure, because you understand that one thing is to supply according to some complex mechanisms and procedures for a long time , and another thing is to supply quickly during the wartime period, when everyone day on the account, he simplified the procedure for submitting the estimated costing material according to which the price is formed to a simple calculation, transferred the responsibility from

the customer to the supplier. that is, we submitted we submit a calculation, we put some profit there and sign it, we submit it to the customer, the customer accepts or does not accept and implements the specified contract accordingly . paying the military from the budget, if the military is paid, it is a loss to the state budget. and what should it be, what should it be, what should it be, not to pay the doctors, not to pay the military, then there will be no losses ? well, let's start talking differently, i pay taxes, so now the state is to blame for me it is correct if the state says that i gave you money and this is a loss . but i gave money to the state and you gave money to the state. so we suffered

losses. let the state return our money . it is a kind of absurdity, and the problem lies in the fact that the conclusions of the state administration service. so we had a press conference in which mr. sokolovsky also took part, who very popularly and clearly conveys to people the essence of existence in general. well, we have one entrepreneur who is checked by more than 30 different bodies, and here it is already a fact that the situation is the indicated situation is not resolved for more than three months, and this is all simply a matter of interaction between e-e ministries within the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, as there are all the necessary clarifications . that is, the state affairs service is subordinate to the ministry of finance. and for the expenses of the e-e budget of defense, the ministry of defense and the ministry of economy are responsible for their explanations. clarification , they give their understanding. but at the same time, the state administration service makes

the following conclusions. why are they dangerous because , first of all, now this institution demands the return of funds from the ministry of defense that's right, the ministry of defense, in its turn, can begin to demand this from the enterprise or go to court, fortunately, it was ... let's say so. the ministry of defense does not consider the conclusions of the state audit service to be legal and challenge them in court and here it is necessary to give credit that for some reason the service was considered only in relation to the ministry of defense. although there is also the national police, the national guard of ukraine, because if we get involved, let’s just have the ministry of defense and everything or because

you can see everything, but one more question can be very similar it is not directly related to money or weapons. i am always interested in this because in normal, civilized countries, what is it customary to call these fiscal uh-uh, if conversations. they are the first thing i see some kind of violation, something that is not irregular, then they are very friendly. so when to you inspectors come, well, if in my understanding they should say the plans, vladyslav, something is not very good here , you ask and what to do, what was better, and then you are like this, that is, it is helpers, it is not cerberus, it is not, it is not enemies, it is people who do everything they are doing the same thing, we need to defend ourselves and attack russia. you help the fiscal authorities help the audit service to god, we all have to stand by and say something we need to improve, how

are they behaving, are they behaving rudely or are they still benevolently behaving because we are all in the same boat called ukraine , well, here you can’t say that they are behaving rudely, here it is important to draw conclusions based on this, because when you say when the state, the civil service speaks as an official state body about that that these are losses to the state budget, any e-e law enforcement service takes losses as a subject of e-e crime and goes to jail anyone. that is, they need to establish the circle of people who were involved. what circle was involved , the supplier and the customer of the ministry of defense , does it help is this the supply of weapons or will they produce weapons? no, for sure, if not, it does not help, of course, is this norm general for all enterprises, for all enterprises , it did not differ for any of the enterprises that supplied for the needs of the ministry of defense. if you want, no, no