[000:00:00;00] constant intelligence groups of the enemy had the names and sometimes the addresses of high-ranking officials who were subject to physical destruction, so at the time of our adoption of this decision last year, it was absolutely justified . military formations, which are vulnerable groups, as far as people's deputies and other high-ranking officials are concerned, this is for today , taking into account, again, security measures, with an absolutely valid proposal, please give the floor to people's deputy of ukraine pavlenko rostislav mykolayovych, european solidarity faction, please give the floor to iryna gerashchenko, iryna gerashchenko, please, how do you know after the adoption of this draft law and european solidarity voted for

the opening of registers of electronic declarations , deputies of local authorities will be declared of village councils who do not receive budget salaries and the like, but those who actually run the country today are not declared, office advisers the president's freelance advisors to the banking government who today give instructions and tell judges how to live in parliament have replaced the government with themselves european solidarity registered bill 9050 on the mandatory declaration of freelance and full-time advisors of the president's office thank you ms. radinia who is the only one not from european solidarity who signed and supported this bill our public questions to you as a representative of the president, such saves for a general declaration, the transparency of the government's work

, when it will be put in order where thank you for your questions, our political force also declares its openness and readiness to open all declarations, regardless of the position held by this or that high-ranking official, if the adoption of certain decisions depends on his decisions, that is why i think that when the conciliation council of deputy factions makes a decision on e- this draft law is ready for consideration in the hall, it will be introduced. and each of the factions will vote to determine which position it takes. thank you . thank you. the discussion is finished. volodymyrovych i invite the head of the committee on anti-corruption policy radino anastasia olehivna to speak for a co-report anastasia olehivna, please good afternoon, dear colleagues, after returning this bill with veto and proposals, the president acted as the guarantor of the constitution of ukraine, according to which the source of power in ukraine is the people of 183,500

ukrainians i spoke in favor of the opening of the declarations of the officials and i, my colleagues . fortunes, colleagues, this is our duty with you on these conditions , we elected officials on these conditions, we have to comply with these conditions , colleagues, the president proposed a mechanism to ensure the safety of military personnel, officials in the occupied territories, prisoners and other similar categories of persons, namely regarding the possibility the removal of previously submitted works from open access, colleagues, and this is a necessary step. therefore, colleagues, the committee considered the proposals of the president, supported them and approved

the final text of the relevant points which recommends for adoption to the verkhovna rada of ukraine, please support colleagues thank you very much dear colleagues, i am asking people's deputies of ukraine to sign up for questions to the co-speaker and please, anastasia legidna , you ran away from you again, questions , please, to the co-speaker, questions, please , ivan ivanovich krulko, faction, homeland, ivan krul, are you right, the next question is i personally and most of the representatives of our faction declared at the beginning of the 2000s . so these were paper declarations. then we in in this hall, in the past, the convenors voted for electronic declarations and we continue to fill them out, we have nothing to hide , including open declarations, we have nothing

to hide them, but here i have a question for you. and what do you think about the fact that everyone in the country declares to us public figures and activists sold an open declaration to these citizens and showed who lives for what, so that the whole country could see the declarations in public access , maybe this would be the right step in order for ukraine to become even more democratic by the state, thank you, thank you, thank you very much, mr. ivan, for your question. i personally submitted the declaration while still in the status of an employee of a public organization according to the law adopted in the previous convocation of the verkhovna rada, which obliged public activists to submit these declarations, i emphasize once again, or i personally was one of those who i submitted a declaration like this and there is nothing to hide, at the same time i remind you that after that the constitutional

court of ukraine recognized such an approach as unconstitutional. i think this answers your question. please, i have the floor. vasylchenko galina ivanivni factions of the political party voice oleksandr yuriivna please dear anastasia olehivna we have all seen a large number of journalistic investigations with scandals about how our prosecutors are now traveling abroad about what estates they are buying. anti-corruption is being carried out in the rear and other employees of this format will declare whether their declarations will be opened, thank you yes they will be

declared and their declarations will be opened closures apply only to those engaged in intelligence. thank you, please. the floor is given to sofia romani fedina of the european solidarity faction. of course, it is fun and sad at the same time when the president's faction votes for closed declarations. the president demands open declarations. now the president's faction will vote for open declarations. in that why do you protect the advisers of the president's office from declaring that these people influence all processes, their companies are affiliated with they receive a lot of state funds for various projects, they conduct international negotiations, say something about arms supplies, they decide what happens to the state , and they don’t have to declare. maybe if you think that everyone should declare, as you said before, you will be one of those who will promote the draft law 10:050 regarding the declaration

of advisers of the president's office and so that we can see what kind of money they live on and what they do with it. speak thank you dear colleagues, we have finished the discussion, now we move on to the speeches thank you for all the time is exhausted dear deputies, please sign up for the speech and from the parliamentary factions of the groups, we agreed on 2 minutes for the speech, the factions of the groups who want to speak are recorded , the floor is given to people's deputy oleksandr volodymyrovych kovalchuk, the faction of the political party servant of the people i understand slavsky

fedor so dear mr. dear mr. chairman dear colleagues, today we really have to consider and decide on a sufficiently important the issue raised by the president of ukraine after we adopted the law on partial opening of the declaration by persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local self-government is the issue of sufficient guests , and the discussion that is already taking place in our hall with our colleagues shows that there is no unequivocal answer to the extent to which it is necessary to make open and transparent declarations for all subjects of declaration , which are provided for by the current law of ukraine, but you and i must understand and we are fine with that we are aware that there is a war going on in ukraine and the enemy is using any resources in order to, among other things, identify persons who may be the objects of, let's say, terrorist attacks by the russian federation, the president of ukraine

, having analyzed the law that you and i came to at the beginning of september the conclusion that the declaration of the people's deputies of ukraine , the declaration of the heads of the central executive bodies despite these threats they should be open and everyone who wants to should get the opportunity to access them and analyze them etc. therefore, the proposals of the president which are formulated and which all of you have the opportunity to evaluate and analyze are sufficiently weighted, on the one hand, they protect vulnerable e-e categories of subjects of declaration , such as servicemen of the armed forces , intelligence agencies of the state border service, on the other hand, they allow taking into account security measures, to open declarations for those who can use their official powers for illegal enrichment on a large scale, for

the impossible of which there is an open system declaration, therefore, our political power will definitely support it and i urge everyone to support the president's proposals, thank you, thank you, please, i invite you to speak. nataliya prykhodko ihorivna frak, the group for the restoration of ukraine dear colleagues, of course, the decision that we made, that during the war there is no need to declare, it was right, why, because it is caused by security issues, but we saw those scandals during the war, which were not only in the ministry of defense, but also in others. who fought , who spilled blood, and who lined their pockets? the countries made the only correct decision on the restoration of the declaration of the question should it be open or partially closed, we

for the first time remember made a decision about and voted for the fact that they were closed for publicity, but completely all law enforcement agencies had full access to them where checks and other things, but we see that the president wrapped it all up, he welcomed this law, why and because people asked him , wrote petitions, and a lot of them, we signed their questions, why and because the people i i understand that he doesn't really trust those who declare themselves, even on the fact that it's a security issue, they don't even respond to it, but want to see what someone has . that during this time we were not involved neither in the schemes nor in the budget

nor in other embezzlements therefore if the initiative of the president so that you are not open we are those proposals we support therefore the group of restoration of ukraine supports this bill thank you thank you please the floor is given to the people to the deputy of the citizens of baku pavlo andriyovych trust group i sincerely apologize dear mr. chairman dear colleagues, i think that such a resonance and such a great attention of the society to the verkhovna rada during the war there were not during these two years as to the actual issue of publicity and openness of those whom people hired for work because

it is clear and logical that these officials, especially deputies of all levels , who themselves asked the people in the communities to be elected for work and to represent their interests, should show those people who elected them what they live on and how they live this is a correct, good european norm , we supported it in the first reading , we are worthy of it, we support it, and i call on the hall to open the actual declaration so that the society can see how officials of various levels live and earn during the war. and yulia tymoshenko , please yulia tymoshenko faction homeland dear colleagues, first of all, i want to say very clearly that our faction supports

the president's proposals and supports the opening of the declaration under the crimea supports the publication of the declaration and we see absolutely no problems with it. on the contrary, this is a positive and good decision . our team has been declaring in paper media since the 2000s, and we have always submitted these declarations , there was never anything hidden, we voted for the creation of all anti-corruption bodies unanimously by our faction, and that's why i once again want to say that transparency in income and expenses is the duty of officials of all levels, deputies of all levels, and we will do it absolutely openly to that team of claims, never

was related to our declarations of the content of these declarations and it will be the same in the future, but at the same time i want to note that today the whole world is talking about corruption in ukraine at the highest level, they are talking about corruption instruments in specific ministries, and today this reduces the power, authority and influence of ukraine and the support of ukraine, and therefore i would like a separate issue of the work of the verkhovna rada to be the clarification of the effectiveness of the work of the anti-corruption court and so on if all the bodies have anti-corruption approvals and corruption is at the highest level thrives in billions of euros. we need to figure it out here, and the clearing of the village is given by the people 's deputy sabol to valentina volodymyrovych, the faction vote

, please oleksandra yuriivna, please ustinova dear colleagues, i remember how we fought for the law on declarations that all the wealth earned by our politicians and our employees er, they were open, you know. i remember the fear that was here in the verkhovna rada when the majority of people who sat here for years and decades who did not want to show their fortunes and they told us that this will be a violation of human rights, that they will be chased, they will also be persecuted , this fear was huge, but when we saw these fortunes, i understood why this fear existed . because when we saw the wrong thing, my churches were declared. only we have all our international partners, but i want to remind you that we were elected by the people and we should listen to the people and not break away from reality. the petition to

open the declarations now and not in a year and then postpone it once again in a day has collected you closed it with more than 80 signatures. this is the largest number of signatures in the history of petition collection. do you know who is the author of this petition? sasha yapchanka, who is currently fighting at the front , a military medic, he and i stood together on the maidan as soon as the full-scale invasion began, he went to the front and was wounded twice. and you know that he was very indignant when they are now fighting at the front and we are afraid to show who bought mersa who bought mom by the way, i strongly advise you if you bought moms and not only mars , declare it too because these are your expenses that's why i'm asking you very much. believe me, the whole country will be looking at all the drawn cards today, so if you think that now you're going to go drink coffee or someone won't see that you didn't vote personally, it's a huge mistake , let's not be ashamed and support the veto. roman factions of european solidarity and

after that we vote dear colleagues , please fedina for my colleague victoria syomar , please dear colleagues, you know in 2016 , ah, the parliament at that time, the convocation at that time actually passed the law, and of course the whole logic of it was in publicity, so dear, what to do with declarations, if you make them closed , it’s a shapsours in itself, this hall closed declarations after allegedly february 24, then generally very strange and interesting things happened, i have a big question, now i’m listening to this extravaganza of desire openness of the declaration, and what prevented us a couple of weeks ago from supporting amendment 171 of anastasiya's radio colleague with this composition of the parliament, and what prevented us from

even approving it by the committee and passing it already approved, well, let's be frank, it is unlikely that the desire for openness was so serious until society, i'm sorry, did not give this composition and the parliament a kick in the ass with this petition and the president vetoed the actually closed declarations. about your commitment to openness, then let's continue and let's finally declare all those people who are involved in the adoption of state decisions , all these freelance advisers who speak on behalf of the state of ukraine are spoiling our relations with our international partners. let's be consistent and stick to our good words about openness. we are voting on the request. dear colleagues, we have finished discussing this issue. we are moving on to voting on the proposals proposed

by the president of ukraine, taking into account the decision of the committee on anti-corruption policy. voting in the order in which they are set forth by the president of ukraine or otherwise determined by the verkhovna rada of ukraine with your permission, the people's deputies are put to a vote proposal number one i ask the people's deputies to vote for 341 the decision is accepted show by factions thank you colleagues proposal number two is put to a vote i ask the people's deputies

to vote for 344 the decision is adopted by factions show dear colleagues all the proposals of the president of ukraine are accepted voting on the law as a whole. as a result of the review , the president of ukraine vetoed the law of ukraine on amendments to certain laws of ukraine on determination of the procedure for submitting a declaration of persons authorized to perform the functions of the state promised self-government under martial law registration number 95 34 i am putting to a vote a proposal to support the proposal of the president of ukraine to this law , taking into account the decision of the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on the issue of anti-corruption policy

, i am asking people's deputies to vote for 341 decision adopted in accordance with article 130 of the regulations and by factions show in accordance with article 130 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine i ask the main committee to prepare the text of the adopted law for signature by the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, taking into account the results of the vote . of ukraine, the chairman of the committee may

be removed from office at any time by decision of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. a draft resolution under registration number 1070 on the recall of people's deputy of ukraine nestor ivanovich shufrych from the post of chairman of the committee on freedom of speech , the relevant materials have been provided to you by e-e in accordance with the second part of article 83 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine according to the registration number 1070 on the recall of people's deputy of ukraine shufrych nestor ivanovych from the position of the chairman of the committee on freedom of speech, i ask you to vote for 288 the decision was made at the peaceful council

e-e faction of the groups decided to consider this issue according to the shortened procedure two for two against i am putting it to a vote i am asking you to vote for this proposal 241 the decision has been made dear colleagues, i am asking the representatives of the faction and groups to sign up for speeches 22 against please the floor is given to savrasov by the people's deputies of ukraine to maksym vitaliyovych, the faction of the european solidarity political party , please pass on the word to sofia fedina sofia

fedina, please, you know the camaraderie here , everything looks ridiculous and sinful in this hall for more than a year, the majority actively defended the right of the polish communist party to be in this hall, actively defended the same man, nestor shufrich, so that he would be the chairman of the committee, and nothing was voted on, because here we have a gap between the monomajority and the polish communist party, let's be honest 13 months ago a draft resolution was submitted stating that former members of the opc should not hold positions or be present in this hall, but what the monomajority said was that we and you have constructive cooperation with the opc

in contrast to other factions months ago, a draft resolution was submitted by european solidarity to remove shufrych from the post of chairman of the committee on freedom of speech. but no, mr. ruslan, i will leave it at that, there are absolutely no grounds for it. well, unfortunately , just like our special services for more than two years, they simply did not see any grounds at all to to deal with the police and for a year they didn't even see concrete criminal grounds to solve these things but it's good that it has come to this now although we see that psg is beautiful and continues to vote for everything that i have more and will say but we would wanted to emphasize something else instead of people who offered to sell dogs becoming the head of the committee, in fact the committee on freedom of speech is a committee that should be represented and headed by representatives of the opposition, and since the only opposition force in this hall is european solidarity, we demand that in the near future there be consider this issue at the head of the committee on freedom of speech because the representative of the opposition

, that is, of european solidarity, and let 's now speak honestly the banned party and their representatives ms. sofia how many of you still contacted me, i will allow myself to react i just want i just want well, i, as the chairman, can speak again at any time i say i just want to remind you that in the previous convocation when this committee was headed by members of your faction, it was during that period that permission was granted for three so-called medvedchuk channels , which fortunately were closed by this government, thank you. let's move on, the word is given to maksym arkadyevich of buzhansk, faction servant of the people, please dear colleagues, if our work does not interfere with the colleagues behind me, i propose to support the committee's decision to vote for, thank you, please shevchenko yevgeny volodymyrovych

deputy group for the restoration of ukraine please in the center yevgeny deputy group for restoration i do not mind that during the day to this position because we have and so, in principle, there is nothing to say, and such a committee there does not even go to meetings, but i am against the fact that the leader of the faction should be a juvenibrag. therefore, there is a proposal at the next meeting to appoint the head of the committee on freedom of speech, the most oppositional to the government, this is geoliros, please give the floor to people's deputy stefanishyna olga anatolyivni, the faction of the political party, the first vote to give the floor to yaroslav yurchyshyn, well, i don't know since when

did monopoly on the opposition appear in our country, but i would like to emphasize that the russian opposition is pro-russian, legally prohibited, a huge thank you to the security service and everyone involved for the fact that mr. nestor shufrych was actually removed from the head of the committee in absentia, because it is a shame to have a person leave, the rest is still at the head of the committee, but the problem next, we now have a huge number of representatives of pro-russian forces, not only in the governing bodies, but also in many local self-government bodies , there is more than one draft law , in particular, the government bill to systematically solve this issue, it does not require changes to the constitution. let's return its functions to actual active interaction with

journalists so that they are allowed on the demarcation line so that they normally cover