[000:00:00;00] well, there is no unequivocal answer here. but is it possible to find putin's money, because russia's money is of course painful. but russia continues to extract something, continuing to trade something for some reason . and somehow, 50 billion dollars lives there, of course . for us, this is a lot of money, well, russia will not die from it. but if strike at putin's personal savings, or can he keep them exclusively in russia? i am not talking about the yacht that, by the way, was driven from hamburg, or from where it was somehow returned to putin in time . to track and try to take them away, you know, almost a third of a dozen years have been searching for putin's assets, and actually there were a lot of journalistic investigations, including but none of them led to the decisions of any competent authorities and generally to the fixation of legal facts. that is, we understand

that if it is one thing to actually predict that this is the case with the probability of his character because a journalist or an investigator or an activist can afford it, that's it. during all this time, starting in 1999, not a single official authority, not a single body who has the authority, he did not declare that specific campaigns or specific assets belong to vladimir putin and today also count on shvydka, so to speak, that you know something, it’s exactly that , it’s probably not worth belonging to him. but again, let’s say that the european partners are american they arrested absolutely everything that was in one way or another connected with the activities of russian oligarchs or the russian state, therefore not only that the path of a number of assets that were recorded in conventionally speaking on other persons but conditionally then the gold of the party in the echelon with diamonds captured somewhere in the west, i think it is hardly worth looking for. this is more of a journalistic story in the legal sense

, in no way are specific assets associated today in all official rhetoric and documents with the president directly, but in fact the good news here is because what difference does it make if absolutely everything is arrested, because it belongs to medvedev putin, whether he or any of the oligarchs, there is no particular difference here , the question is that we really have to advocate the situation with the recovery of those assets that are already frozen today and do not move outside the jurisdiction of the american european and with this also for everything if it would be good in fact unfortunately because we will receive a very, very insignificant share of the funds it is through the mechanisms that we will receive we have or about persons who have committed a crime under the laws of america or, for example, the belgian authorities partially give us their taxes that they received for income during the war in accordance with the russian, so today the situation is still not even inside we are probably somewhere

we remain at the beginning of the formation of a new legal mechanism of compensation for ukraine for having carried out an action, you know how much money and cultural values ​​and gold diamonds were returned to the countries from which it was recognized after overcoming hitler's nazism. furnaces of war, but you know that an important story was remembered, uh. well, about six months ago, i read about the fact that one of the banks in switzerland discovered money that the nazis kept there. well, some of their ancestors are already there. their descendants and the nazis took that money from the jews they tortured, i.e. almost 100 years have passed, the war started, well, there somewhere 180 and only now did they discover that money in a swiss bank, that is, there may be putin's money in some respectable banks and some respectable companies may be like that or otherwise founded by someone inspired by putin and you can simply find out after 100 years in fact and in fact, if we are talking about the practice of reparations, for example

, germany made the last payment in 2010 year for the first world war on the basis of the treaty of versailles, it is just an understanding, actually it was small, but one way or another it is really stretching over time seriously and for example, we also mentioned with you the kind with cancer, kuwait received the last payment in 2022, also enough time has passed since the adoption of all decisions, the development of mechanisms, and so on, that is why this process is complicated, indeed it is long, but we cannot not engage in it, well, in any case, i am happy, i think that you also have what is in the white house they are actively looking for mechanisms well, maybe today there will be a meeting between the president of ukraine and the combined presidency of the combined states, maybe there will also be a discussion about money, i would like to and maybe we have some hope that we will get this money , we really need it now, and then when we need it, but right now, that's right, thank you joined thank you for your professional and accurate comments gennadiy dubov v political expert so we talked about the fact that the white house is already

looking for mechanisms to return frozen russian assets to ukraine while there is a scheme e the scheme that was launched in 1977 is called it is an abbreviation in english i and pia is the law on extraordinary international economic powers and now the usa wants to take over these international economic powers, it implemented it already in the 90s, when iraq was probably dying, but then it was a decision of the security council of the united nations, now in the fight against the united nations, we know that there is the russian federation, which can block any decision, and here it is clear that if it comes to its money, this decision will be blocked by this wedding, no, what kind of benzene represents russia in the organization of the united nations well, we have to work, we have to work, russian money is frozen, we have to give it to those who became victims of the aggression of the russian federation well, how do you fight with the aggressor, eh, we will talk about this with serhiy zgurets, director of the french express agency - these are the presenters of the military summary of the day serhiy i congratulate you vasyl i congratulate our viewers if at the end of the program

he talked about the fact that in karabakh they shot an armored car that was russian well, like peacekeepers well, they are there they are officially called the military and among them was the deputy commander of the submarine forces of the northern fleet. by the way, even the more combat-capable northern fleet of the russian federation ivan kavgan is what he is doing there. well, it is difficult to say, but then he apologized to putin, er, aliyev, that they killed these people, but there is some a very dark and strange story, what can you tell about it? well, really , the information passes, he said it is true, there was an apology from the president of azerbaijan, but i think that the fact is quite positive, because if they are destroyed there the russian military, regardless of where they were, this is actually positive news . well, later in our summary of the day, we will talk about the missile attack on ukraine, about our attack on russian facilities in crimea, about the new package

of military aid from the united states , and actually about expectations from the visit of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi to the united states and about this in a moment today, russia once again demonstrated that it is a terrorist country and a violator of all rules and customs of the introduction of war on the night of september 21, the russian occupiers massively attacked ukraine with air-based cruise missiles khas-101 and kh- 55

, a total of 43 cruise missiles were recorded, which were launched from 10 strategic aircraft, and the russians here released 95 over ukraine. 36 missiles were destroyed, that is, almost 84%, and this is a good indicator, taking into account the fact that it was a difficult attack, there were several waves of these missile launches, and the missiles were maneuvering and constantly changing their course during the route and a couple of days before that, let me remind you that drones were used en masse in the rural federation of gentlemen, which can also be associated with an attempt to influence the effectiveness of our air defense before the en masse use of these cruise missiles that were accumulating for this attack, while some of the missiles were in such a condition that almost the warhead was falling off. on our website, defect express, there is a video of the warhead from the 101 missile that did not explode. it broke off and was not detonated, and then the warhead was taken

to a safe place for destruction and against the infrastructure objects were damaged in some regions of ukraine, including energy objects, and as it was stated that this is the first russian attack on the energy system in six months, it can be predicted that of course , in winter and autumn, the enemy will surely use cruise missiles to attack our energy structure, therefore the issue of strengthening air defense remains an urgent issue, which zelenskyi actually spoke about today as one of the issues that will be raised in the negotiations with the american side will again talk about air defense systems, and in turn, today the armed forces of ukraine inflicted the largest such massive attack with unmanned systems and ukrainian markets on military facilities and the so far occupied crimea. we are talking about the explosions that took place in saki , yevpatoria, simferopol, sevastopol, balaclava

, there were everywhere explosions were heard and the security service and the naval forces of ukraine launched this massive attack on crimea and, among other things , an attack was made on the saka military airfield at that time, fighter jets or aircraft of the 430th warship were based at this airfield , as well as from intercaps , the pantsir complex was also located there. in strike missions from the ukrainian side , drones were used that passed through air defenses, and then neptune cruise missiles were used, which we see were modified for strikes on the ground. these are not the first launches of such land-based neptunes

guidance and we can talk about what or make assumptions that in such a variant the land of neptune has a range of up to 400 km and how much the enemy lost after these strikes on the crimea, the data is still being clarified, but it is definitely known about the significant losses of the enemy and strength, and in addition to the losses suffered by the enemy . yesterday, after a successful attack by storm shadow missiles on the command post of the black sea fleet of russia near the temporarily occupied sevastopol, there were already satellite images showing that the storm hit was relatively sufficient turned there, the building was destroyed, which the enemy lost. well, let's wait for the data from the necrology, which will then possibly appear in russian publications, well , in order to hit the enemy even more, the pressure was more effective. the united states is expected to announce today a new package

of military aid for ukraine will be announced by the president of the united states, it is about a package of 325 million dollars, it primarily includes ammunition because supplies for artillery for farmers are intriguing, is there still or is there attacks, although the reuters agency, which was the first to report on this aid package, says that there are no attacks at all, but this package can be finalized . of this day, but of course we are now waiting for the results and negotiations between the president of ukraine and the president of the united states and what can expectations talk about, what plans and

prospects we will talk about this with our our guest is mykhailo himself, he is the head of the analytical organization new geopolitis of khrystochynetsky and also the director of the center for the study of the army, conversion and disarmament, mr. mykhailo. i congratulate you . i am glad to see and hear you. i congratulate you, mr. serhiy. and so far this paradigm continues in the provision of aid in such a format that ukraine does not lose and russia does not win. and the question arises whether it is possible to expect that this is a meeting between the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi and joe biden will somehow change this paradigm or the approach of the american side will remain unchanged and we will still proceed under the conditions offered to us by our american partners, well, again, i have my own hypothesis regarding the pace or, let's say, the intensity

of supplies of e-e arms to ukraine, which concerns the election campaign in the united states the election campaign is gaining momentum uh all this is already gaining such a direct influence on all the decisions made by the biden administration this is absolutely normal a little over a year it remains until the elections, which are also very important for the united states. well, it is clear for the democratic party. therefore, the decisions will all be very clear. and it is very interesting to watch how we, uh, made decisions about the f-16 . at first, we were told that it would be several months of preparation after that, the pilots will gradually gain mastery of the english language. and in general, this transfer can happen somewhere in the first half of the 24th year . then, in general, some conversations took place. it is possible that the second half of the year can be, that is, on that

at the time, it was not clear how successful the ukrainian offensive was, and then and then , for example, i concluded that the americans are trying. the biden administration is trying as much as possible . the deputy director of the center of the army e conversion and discussion about our expectations from the visit of the president of ukraine to the united states, there are several such components important for the ukrainian side - these long-term support in financing is the issue of critical components of weapons, in particular against someone, about which we repeatedly talk about the issue of corruption that can be raised by the american side and now we return to the conversation with mykhailo

stepan himself mykhailo continues your opinion yes , that is, at that time there was no clarity with the ukrainian offensive and the impression that the american arrow wanted to be away from the events on the battlefield as soon as information appeared that the ukrainian army was already breaking through the main line of defense, but not so quickly the trends are clear, the ukrainian army sooner or later the russian line of defense in the south immediately rushed information that there will be f-16 and it seems that english is not needed there, it should be taught there but in parallel with other areas of pilot training, let’s say, and what kind of aircraft can already to be before christmas or in any case at the beginning of the 24th year, that is, now the situation is changing and if we talk about what the biden administration would like to see, it is, of course, the successes

of the ukrainian army, the successes of ukraine against russia, and here it seems to me that it is already necessary move on to more serious deliveries, including f16, and if they are uh-uh in the winter, then the rockets are needed for the attacks, well, of course , then when the operation to liberate the crimea is already being prepared, because in fact, if we were to start delivering sdb bees now, they are ammunition for high-mars 150-160 km, with which there are obviously technological problems at the boeing sun company, which is now making them for attacks from 300 km, nevertheless, now, in fact , it is not such an urgent need as in the operation to liberate crimea. 150 km, that is, to the depth of the front, would be ideal in general, but unfortunately, it seems that there are really technological problems , not political ones, that is, now biden may not

announce the provision of these missiles to us, but, for example, a promise will be received - a promise from him that as soon as the ukrainian army is ready to conduct an operation to liberate crimea, such missiles will be provided to two more components of these negotiations, on the one hand , security guarantees in the form of relations with the united states as an echo of these large agreements with the big seven and the second bloc uh, corruption, i heard, well, conditional corruption, which one way or another the congressmen will raise in the negotiations with the ukrainian president in order to create such a certain pressure on our side , because moncart, what is uh, kevin on the map when yesterday or today he talked about the two issues of accountability for weapons of parallel signs. how are they used there or not resold, and the second strategy of victory is that , first of all, about the guarantee of security in the format of approaches of the united states, what can we

expect in relation to the reporting of weapons? officials that the best evidence that weapons are used on the battlefield and not stolen are the successes of the ukrainian army on the battlefield, i.e. if high-mars were to be dragged around the bazaars somewhere, it is obvious that we would not have them successfully use on the battlefield, so here, in principle, i am only in favor of control , especially again, it is necessary to understand that all these deliveries are carried out, let's say, within the framework of the internal procedure of the united states. that is, we are no longer transferred cash, which then 10 weapons purchases are used. in fact, all these procedures are budgetary and financial. they usually take place inside the united states as part of their financial process. and we are already given our own weapons that are transferred for use on the battlefield, that is, if

we are talking about uh, about spreading it illegally somewhere in the world well, here it is. one thing is export control, another is financial control , but this is more about how the biden administration uses funds. what is the cost of that? or other weapons that are transferred to ukraine and so on regarding corruption in the ukrainian army or in the ministry of defense or in the defense sector, of course the factor here is that a new minister of defense has been appointed, who has his own plan, who has his own views on this area. i think that at the moment this moment will be enough to demonstrate that really president zelenskyi does not cling to individual functionaries or officials , he is ready for changes, he is ready for new

ideas, new approaches to formation and defense policy and the functioning of the ministry of defense itself. by the way, the minister of defense himself is new. he is already taking steps to ensure that everyone works energetically with the ministry of strategic industry. this is very important because in the new year there will be more money specifically for the ministry of static industry and it is really important here to build an effective system when the leader is the ministry of defense and the ministry of static industry coordinates the activities of defense enterprises, and both private and public ones foreign ones that are already producing the same drones under state programs, that is, because we seem to have called the amount 48 billion next year, it will be in the second year, this is not a small amount, which would be important to use effectively, this is of fundamental importance, because it is obviously the 24th year will be decisive from the point of view of conducting successful operations . well, we are talking about the fact that we have to effectively use our own funds and our own opportunities, and at the same time we certainly hear

from european american companies that we will be more determined and faster because there is an impression that european companies and the united states are also not overly active in the matter of the munitions produced there, i think that the ukrainian side should still stress to our partners that it is necessary to somehow speed up the supply of those weapons that can to be of decisive importance on the battlefield. and by the way, how do you see the changing dynamics in the american and european defense industry, does it actually meet the needs and challenges facing them and ukraine? well, in fact, we know what is the european bureaucracy, for example, including in the defense industry , that is, in fact, when we talk about decision-making in the defense industry of the european union within the framework of the european defense agency, it always takes, as a rule

, a month or, in normal procedures, years in this case uh, the european bureaucracy does, well, actually, look when decisions are made that are implemented within weeks, and this is already very good for ukraine, although , of course, we need to speed up, we need to do everything possible so that the ukrainian armed forces have there is enough ammunition for the ukrainian armed forces to have high-precision ammunition, the same gsdb is enough , because it is not clear why gsb produces such delays, because in fact, not having air superiority and not having enough high-precision means and i will remind you that the grand leon-den-meter bombs are quite cheap, there we are not talking about millions of dollars, as a rule , when we talk about high-precision ammunition, but tens of thousands, what is the cost

, well, within the framework, at the level at western prices it is very cheap and then it was possible to use them very, very effectively and in fact massively to destroy the targets of the proto-terrorist now in progress and offensive, it would be of great help to us, unfortunately , we have no advantage in the air , and the ukrainian troops are in fact in the conditions of the second world war advance well actually breaking through every trench in close combat it's no no i think it's wrong we need why we're talking about uh more drones well why don't we release let's say 100,000 fp drones i don't see in this problem in order to reduce precisely the load on the personnel and transfer it to the shoulders of the drones is absolutely

realistic. in the current conditions, regarding the duration of the war as such, of course , it is impossible to predict such a question is more theoretical than practical, but everyone is trying their own lines pull out and measure these indicators, bloomberg refers to the representatives of the countries of the big seven that the war there will last 6-7 years, the german general in yalta at the eu conference says that there germany is ready to support ukraine there at least until the 30th year, which in fact speaks of significant temporary indicators, these significant indicators here should be perceived as optimistic or optimistic, so how should our average citizen feel about this , and when he hears such, well, he has enough long-winded time parameters, well, first of all, all these conversations are again at the level of the european bureaucracy, the american bureaucracy, this

means that funds will be allocated and planned for these periods of 6-7 years the 30th year, that is, the europeans and the americans are ready to allocate sufficient funds in the budget to support the armed forces of ukraine. this is very good, that is, when we move to long-term planning, we have the opportunity to produce more and in a more controlled, larger volume weapons, ammunition, systems, to provide the armed forces of ukraine with everything necessary in order to continue the war with russia, this is the first and second from the point of view of the definition of what is meant by war. the fact is that even the liberation of all territories of ukraine establishment of territorial integrity, restoration of territorial value and establishment of sovereignty will not mean the capitulation of russia. it is obvious that russia will continue the war, and in this case , representatives of nato, representatives of europe, the united states

, they absolutely correctly understand that ukraine can clear its territory. strikes on the territory of ukraine. in other words, we will have to, in addition to everything else, continue to build up our anti-missile anti-aircraft defense potential, and on the other hand, it can inflict strikes even on the territory of nato countries, and here we must be ready to expand the capabilities of nato countries themselves, because ukraine is now supported by the ipo system in the nato countries themselves. well, for example, especially on the eastern flank. the same romania or the baltic countries or even poland, they are not even now they are not even up to the level of ukraine and this, of course, requires quite a long planning of the spending of funds, so i think it is a positive thing that there is no discussion about whether or not to turn these programs over to us at all, because this is a ukrainian

issue, let's somehow move on to already the freezing of the conflict is a completely different trend here, on the contrary, we are ready to support it in the format even if in the 24th year we clean up the entire territory of ukraine, including the crimea, e-e. next will be the strengthening of the european american defense sphere in order for you to continue e-e to put pressure on russia, i.e. to achieve the defeat of russia, and the defeat of russia cannot come next year , the victory of ukraine may, but the defeat of russia will come when the putin regime is destroyed. unfortunately, it still has quite a powerful potential and mr. mykhailo, we have literally one minute, i would like you to summarize this story in relations with poland so that, relatively speaking, the onion does not stand in the way of the leopard. here are your assessments of how to get out of this situation. i think that there are too many emotions, too much politics here, because today i see how the minister of defense of poland has already started to comment on the grain of flour and so on, that is, it is clear that the minister of defense is already acting as

a politician in the election campaign, it has nothing to do with bilateral relations or, uh, about the help there, by the way, uh today, the polish side announced that in fact poland continues to fulfill, for example, the contract for the supply of self-propelled guns to ukraine. i think that there and in other areas of defense equipment, for example, poland is not going to stop because it is beneficial to it, and there is no doubt that these contracts will continue if the two parties are interested i think they are interested and that is why i think that after the elections this issue will be removed and moreover i think that in the coming days the issue of grain will also be removed because slovakia has already declared slovakia stated that she is ready to withdraw her claims if ukraine, of course, withdraws her claims to the world trade organization and poland. i think poland will follow the same path, well, hungary is a different story, but the main thing is that we and the poles and slovaks now

resume normal dialogue and remove this political aspect, because actually the politics here, well, the election campaign - that explains a lot, mr. mykhailo. thank you very much for your professional comments for your time, and i would like to remind our viewers that mykhailo , the head of the organization, was on the air during the press class. geopoliti-ts-rysovych, the network is also the deputy to the center for research on the army, conversion and disarmament. these were the main results of the day, and more international and economic news from vasyl zima on the big ether, so stay tuned to the espresso channel, we can continue . 00 at the start of yuriy fiza , the world about ukraine is ahead, it is very interesting to learn about the situation there in the states, there is what is happening in karabakh and many, many other things, money during the war with oleksandr marchenko, and there is also something about