[000:00:00;00] girls differ in their regularity if we talk about the project itself, all 10 of them are really more feminine, feminine, symmetrical, 80% of the women apply - volunteers, and the gatherings are dropped off every day, regularly, too, women but i, uh, there are a few guys who come , we have such oleg kulyk is a subscriber, for example, he is always a hooligan, he comes and has a date once a week, 666 hryvnias or 777, that's it. and there is one subscriber who always a-a makes a glass to the jar when something beautiful also appears there you know the number

when the sum is rounded, it is like this look, look, and that is, people find more entertainment in these numbers, it’s cool, uh, there are people who become ambassadors. well, they don’t just donate, and then, well, that’s without it. guys , let’s all repost, share the project, and they directly they themselves take and attract their own audience and this is also a cool trend, that is, i do a good deed and you do a good deed . but the biggest feedback was when i asked why you do it and what the project gives you. they give you the opportunity to feel that you are helping someone, uh, they just drown out some shame that i am not doing enough, plus here you can immediately see such a 10 hryvnia points. and they are like that a day later and a truck of bread has already left. you clearly

understand that you are important, the more you are small. maybe you are invisible, maybe today you are in some kind of autumn apathy but you took an action and here is your result about motivation why i do it i really like quick results there are people here who know how to plan in the long run i really like that today i wanted to and already so that tomorrow the project will be all 10 gives me this feeling that we can quickly help without these without all this bureaucratic red tape. this is about the difference between ukrainians and russians. if we talk about my personal contact with russians, he was with me

exactly one year ago at the festival in estonia i was the only ukrainian woman there, and i arrived and immediately understood, yes, today we are wearing armor because the russians are just crazy here , they are from narva, the festival was in narva. it's the russians and when i came to this festival, and this is my first meeting with russians. well, as such , after the start of the war in 14th, it will be difficult for me , but i will try, well, i will try to keep myself in my hands , and the festival lasted for almost a week and even one of them tried to somehow communicate there. and what do you have there, and i am more powerful than a european , until a round table appeared, where there was a representative of the belarusian theater who

was forced to leave belarus because they were pressed and arrested. they took the theater to london, and i was there. which told about ukraine theater and you know there are curly haired people sitting in the audience and i am telling you, you know, i am saying that in our country we have a democracy, we can go on stage in the theater and tell dear people , we like it in our theater, we can sneer at some deputy from the stage because we have the right to say it a-a we can go to europe, you know, and there er, yes, we would of course we don't have to stand there, i'm watching how people 's er face is crooked and there's this exactly they don't have all this, they have this well, they have this they cannot understand what it is to be a person who has a voice and rights, they can’t have them, you know, like

someone came on stage and said something veiled about the government in the words of the great tolstoy, illa chekhov and all such, god, what a controversial performance, but we can do it well, right now, that is, sit here here, klitschko is in the hall and i will be able to talk about klitschko , what i don't like about him, and there is no such freedom in russia , that's why they will never be able to understand us. though a scandal because one imperial woman stood up, whose books and articles i read at the karpenko-kary university, because then we were all slaving over the gun theater criticism was only in russia theater was only

in russia 20 years ago yes and we are there there in the magazine theater in russian they wrote one word something about ukrainian, can you imagine and i meet 20 years after my studies this young lady with whom i used to read, she stands up and foams at the mouth why do we not know what is happening in the theater in ukraine why are you nothing but you we know, we must be together, like, maybe because you attacked our country. and maybe you could find out something, if you tried to inquire, at that moment there was no acute conflict between theatergoers, like, we could still look for al in some planes, some contacts, but - and it was with this performance that and why does the ukrainian theater

not show itself to us by the emperors ? themselves and in short, then they everyone was just walking in such a flock, lost. and i was the only one, and so were the europeans who came up there, yaroslava and irosia, who eats separately there, occupies some row in the theater, and this was my only meeting that ah showed me , well, first of all, in why is the difference about freedom, and secondly, the person seems to suit you and asks how the coffee machine works, but she looks at you like shit so you feel that they look at you like shit and i at first i thought that it could be one person well, then you

you feel this attitude towards you from everyone that is, this is a national trait, this superiority, because of my personal, small experience of personal contact. and this is this difference , which is completely different. why will the ukrainians win? we can’t, they win, first of all, the price is not very high. for all these years, it is very high. the price and a lot of blood has been invested and a lot of lives and families have been broken , i am not happy, i hope that i can already see that a part of society is like this well, we believe in a landslide , they will figure it out anyway. wants to abstract from stable, but a very large part of society and a very large part of cool people

who will go to the end, and i know that we know how to go to the end, like i was actively involved in the revolution of the 14th year, and i saw the first volunteers who came out with bare heads, whose heads we gathered and they left, few came back but after that, the buses are filled with volunteers every time and they go they go i.e. but this one was knocking for a ride this is this thirst for freedom and the ability to go to the end is probably the main answer well, i'm ready to go to the end and i'm ready to lead you know people if i don't drop uah 10 each, i know where they live, we will work

until victory after february 24, 2022. it is impossible to be in ukraine and stay away from the war, so they united around their army, which protects it, and the desire to go to it depends on its needs. has increased tremendously, so we do not spend it and continue to donate to help our defenders and defenders and do not forget that your 10 hryvnias can become a million there are 10%

discounts on pectolvan in pharmacies life, of course, the news feed reports about them, but little is known about what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovskii and the invitation experts soberly assess the events, analyze them by modeling our near future that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m. studio event with anton borkovskii nayspresso in august 2023 espresso tv channels continues to lead the top of ukrainian informational tv channels . congratulations, according to measurement data, viewers choose ukrainian channels. view from espresso

, congratulations, friends mykola veresen vitalik autoboye thank you to all ukrainians for their trust. espresso works for you. hello, this is freedom, the morning, the informational project of radio svoboda, top guests every day , this is the shipping district of kherson. we are live. we are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut. of air time 2 hours of your time we will talk about the most important things for two hours to learn about the war serhiia zhoretska joins the air the military summaries of the day and what is the world like what is there in the world yuriy fizer will tell for two hours to stay up to date with economic news sent by oleksandr marchenko he tells us about the economy during the war and new sports yevhen pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters about culture during the war he is ready to talk about lena or other presenters who have become

familiar to many, maybe the weather though will give us some optimism ms. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, and we will also have a distinguished guest of the studio today, volodymyr grishko , if everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours , vasyl's big broadcast in winter, a project for smart people and those who care, in the evening, the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians, victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhii rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future, the main and interesting thing is now in the verdict serhii rudenko program from monday

to friday at 8:00 p.m., repeat at 12:10 p.m. i congratulate you on the espresso channel. in particular, he said that there is a long-term agreement that ukraine will jointly produce the necessary weapons with america. and as an example, these can be air defense systems, said zelenskyy . financial support from the united states and security guarantees for ukraine. by the way, this was also discussed in washington, where the congress is currently considering the request of the white house for additional aid

to ukraine in the amount of 24 billion dollars during meetings with american congressmen, volodymyr zelenskyi called on them to provide this aid to ukraine, because otherwise, without this aid , everyone would lose, said zelenskyi, but it was the republicans at this time who were asking about the effect of the already provided aid and financial aid and asked about the plans ukraine for further combat operations as for the format of the security guarantee, this is an extremely important thing because, er , putin has lost this hope of being able to wait out the period of unity of the leading countries of the world in support of ukraine regarding the guarantee of security joe biden said that the usa has begun the process of formalizing our long-term commitments to the security of ukraine together with other leaders of the g7 and other international partners, but there are not many details yet, because as we can see, this process is ongoing.

volodymyr zelenskyi what strategy and decision does our chairman choose for his partner during the pre-election period and how will this affect our ability to defend and attack, how will this affect the course and prospects of our war with the enemy, we will talk about this to speak in the next issue of our program on the spzo channel with leading ukrainian experts, my name is serhiy zgorets, i am the director of the information consulting company defense express, which, together with the espresso channels, tries to cover the most relevant trends related to the security of our country, and now it is joining us, valentin batrak, director of the research center of the army of conversion and dismantling of analytics, writer valentina vitaiyu, i am glad to see sergey vitaiyu live on the espresso channel, and i am glad, as always, to be invited to of this broadcast, i would like to start with your general evaluations of the results of zelensky's stay in washington, because before we perceived, yes, we still perceive the position

of the united states through the prism of aid within such certain frameworks so that russia does not win and ukraine does not lose, but it looks that this is actually not enough from the point of view of our interests , but with regard to the interests of the united states itself . how do you evaluate the statements of the words that would have been said during the visit, well, the decision is different. well, first , if you answer the question the result is already from the provided weapons from the provided aid, then the result is one ukraine a-a has endured and it continues to stand yes and in principle this result is satisfactory for washington yes it is better for washington and for the biden administration it is better now that ukraine is standing it is resistant it is fighting

er, but er, that ukraine wins well, so far, er, biden does not need this, i thought for a very long time whether it was er, a mistake er, in fact, in western countries, including the biden administration, or whether it was done deliberately. before the offensive, ukraine was underarmed and made incorrect assessments of russia and the potential of the russian defense, and with the potential of the ukrainian offensive, now i am inclined to believe that this was done deliberately, and i want to remind you that on the first day of the visit, zelensky wrote that we are at the finish line in the negotiations about the attacks on the tactical army missiles tactical missile complexes that are very much needed by the ukrainian army now and thanks to which ukraine would receive the sub-german

taurus cruise missiles and could move on with the shooting of all logistical infrastructure centers, in particular in crimea. and this would lead to enormous pressure on putin's regime and i do not rule out that this year it could end a generally hot company because russian groups could generally be sprinkled now, such a revolutionary study has been done in russia that a mobilized person in russia lives on average four and a half months from the summons before burying him in the cemetery or leaving his corpse here on ukrainian territory, that's why the situation was very much in favor of the ukrainian defense forces, but now we have what we have , the west has concentrated on the west, including

the biden administration has actually focused on the 24th year when ukraine will get the first planes in the 16th and when when new options will be possible maybe because sullivan very clearly said that uh the issue of uh attack is not closed but it may arise on the agenda later later it is probably somewhere at the level of the 24th year, and therefore, evaluating the visit as a whole , and the next day after zelenskyi said that the question is rocketing to the finish line. the next day, this question did not arise, but it was already said that first of all, we are talking about anti-aircraft defense defense, but definitely this is a very necessary conversation and from all contexts and the cover of the f-16 airfields and the cover of our decision-making centers and ultimately the protection of the civilian population, although we understand that

it will be impossible to close the whole of ukraine even if ukraine really aimed to get those 50 e complexes of the petriv missile defense system, which zelensky once mentioned , then the ambitions were reduced to 12 systems because it is really not possible and not realistic in the future to get such a huge the number of such expensive systems, after all, ukraine has already received 76 billion dollars of aid from western partners, and the vast majority of it is from the americans, and from america itself, so the issue is joint production. well, for now, we need to figure out what kind of joint production it is about the possibility of a certain localization , it will be quite good because we know that poland

literally this er at the end of the summer and the beginning of the fall announced two large localization projects, in particular poland or will produce anti-tank complexes javelin and poland e will produce a part of himars, including missiles, e missiles. i think those are not attacks from a, those that are used for salvo fire, e-e, and e-e will produce parts of himers launchers, i will say that if poland receives now 45 missiles, a it would also be very good if the ukrainian authorities and the americans worked with poland to ensure that ukraine received these 45 missiles, and poland , in turn, moved further. unfortunately, the reactive diplomacy of the ukrainian authorities

failed for the second time. the first time we know this with israel relations with poland are now very damaged. that is why we need to think about it, because actually , washington made poland the main bridgehead in europe, and here ukraine could claim to do certain things together with poland and advance further precisely in terms of the localization of production, it is currently unknown what kind of production it will be, but i want to remind you in the end that ukraine has not announced how much it has already announced and how much it did not want to advance military-technical cooperation, so far not a single joint venture with a foreign country has been created unfortunately, in the 18th year, an agreement was reached with turkey on the creation of a joint

enterprise, the black sea shield, but the situation did not go any further. comes to the market independently and builds enterprises here, now the most real and such a kipiai, so to speak, the indicator will be the german region of metal, if it is true in the 23rd year , joint production and joint repair work will begin, then this will be the first step towards creating it is joint production that ukraine desperately needs, because it is both technology and opportunities to expand exports, joint export of weapons, and in the end it is a big policy because the arrival of large western companies in ukraine - this is as much a part of the guarantee of security as in the context of obtaining and creating advanced technologies and separating technological from of hostile russia, yes

and actually speaking, the presence of western business inside ukraine, which will be a restraining factor e for e for the russian authorities, i hope that the next russian authorities will be more more cautious than this putin's criminal putin's criminal regime, so, in general, if you take the question of the evaluation of the visit , eh, eh, if there were not this eh, this statement about joint productions, then in general it could be said that the results are very, very problematic er, that er, the goal has not been achieved, but in the end, these er, new days of opportunity are somehow equalizing er, the general problems of the visit and the problems, i think, not so much of the ukrainian government, but now of the american government, which is

currently fluctuating and can't make a decision regarding the strategic support of ukraine, because there is no geopolitical solution to russia and no solution to the destruction of the regime. actually speaking, the main burden is on themselves, they are taking the defense force of ukraine and e. what is the conclusion from this ? and its own drones and unmanned systems, both air and sea and land-based - this is a very powerful element of asymmetric weapons together with the traditions of ukrainian special forces yes yes just about what the united states is now are going through such a difficult period from the point of view of internal political struggle. when zelensky spoke before the congressmen, when he was there

discussing the terms of providing financial assistance or the details of past assistance , zelensky said that there would be no financial support, that is, if we do not receive help, we will lose the war. end of quote - this is actually one of the contestants of the democrats, he just re-narrated zelensky's speech in such a narrow circle with congressmen about why we will lose the war , how should we interpret it, i think for sure that is broader than the question of the ukrainian russian front in particular, the question in general is certainly the attitude of the united states to the russian threat and attempts to build some kind of strategy of its own, which seems to be more far-sighted compared to the interests of ukraine, but where is the factor when the situation in ukraine looks like that we are on our own closing the main problems , the question arises as to how far the usa is able to really

protect the interests of its partners , what do you think about this? well, it looked a little scary, but there is a big nuance related to the fact that uh, ours is a loss or uh, or our victory is interpreted differently here and in the west, and our loss is what zelensky says, it means that we will not achieve goal and we will not be able to achieve the liberation of all of ukraine, but this situation is not considered a loss in washington and washington, it would be a normal compromise even to freeze the war, and when they were doing the provision of this summer dash

of the autumn campaign, the emphasis was on reached the army to the sea dismembered the russian group and destroyed the land corridor. this was the main goal in its best form . the main goal was the liberation of the territories that were captured after february 24, 2022. about other territories we didn’t even think about it, and it’s frank, but these ideas through the western mass media and through insider channels, we know it well, but in the end, zelenskyi remembers churchill’s saying just as well that the americans will do everything right, but after uh all other options will be tested, so now it is precisely about the fact that all other options are being tested, and the missile missile issue is postponed a little, and if there really is

a threat to the fall of ukraine, then the americans will speed up the provision of f16 and uh-uh, accelerate the provision of uh-uh missiles for these attacks with e and possibly some other weapons such as e-e fire support helicopters or maybe drones of an operationally strategic operational-tactical level, all this is possible , but for now. unfortunately, the situation looks like the main burden of the war is placed on forces of defense against ukrainian soldiers e and e hm actually, it is connected with the capabilities of ukraine itself e therefore, returning to the conclusions, i want to say that the only one possibility for ukraine to win, the only one, in fact, the only possibility, is to create a situation when we will have thousands of missiles such