[000:00:00;00] not to take it back to us, here is another concession and we will no longer accept another concession and we will no longer accept if the result was after the rhine or before austria, well, there is a high probability that this would not have happened further, it is still a reaction to the rhine and what the french will stop him, uh, then they also decided that it was better to appease and appease this aggressor, of course, hitler was afraid, one must admit that he was well aware of the adventure he was entering into, and until the end of his life he was worried about how it would all end, and this is one of the reasons for his suicide . full recognition of his collapse politicians, he himself admitted that he lost and his ideas were completely bankrupt, and he was very lucky in the 1930s that

the united states survived the severe economic crisis and did not interfere in european affairs. at that time of the great war, somewhere in the people's subconscious, it was better to make some concessions even in this hitler. how suspicious and adventurous he is, and he looks like a leader with some strange ideas, even to him, that is, he was considered for k the leaders of the european states for england for france a little closer than, say, they would negotiate with the soviet union, they probably had no idea how to negotiate with the soviet union , they did not trust him and could not believe a single word, everyone was in a state of mistrust of each other, and only then when in germany, the ussr was attacked by this block of countries that was formed between england, the united states and the soviet union . the events themselves led to the fact that they became allies, and only for a short time, and then only

until they defeated hitler. to pay tribute to the ability of both hitler himself and his team to play on human weaknesses, that is, well, in this case, not on human glory, on the weaknesses of a separate state that uh, they understand that at a certain stage great britain and france want something, they this is played for sure in my stage what czechoslovakia wants for sure in the stage of poland romania hungary soviet union and in this period of time the events there from er even even in the last year from september 38th to september 39th playing on these weaknesses in the interests of each of these central european states, taking these heavy weights from the east and the west, they managed to turn these, as alexander says

, adventures to their advantage and, once again , to build up their muscles for further marches to the east and west. if munich 38 is a failure of diplomacy, diplomats should have used some kind of intelligence report , they should have been told that hitler was preparing for war , they should have understood that or hitler was not preparing for war, so there are only 11 months left before the great war. that they missed not only the danger of hitler as a leader, but there is military power, of course, clearly because all the years, as soon as hitler came to power in the 33rd year, what did he do first , psychologists point out that he returned many germans to the germans a military uniform, why is this a psychological revenge that let's build up the army again, but after the first world war they were reduced as much as possible. that is, they were forbidden to have heavy

weapons and the navy and much more. a whole list in germany was weakened as much as possible, and here hitler psychologically came to power plays on that and we will build a strong germany again. we will rebuild military factories . we will have tanks. we will have our own fleet. we will have development. we will have everything. the military industry was made up of a lot of money by various businessmen, including not only from germany, but also from other countries of the world . they probably underestimated that hitler would reach the point where he would be able to conquer such countries as france and fight against great britain, the usa now, when we sum up the results, it is easier for us to look at these events from afar, but if we look at that moment, in the 30s, it was constantly increasing, that is, the power of the german army was increasing, and all these

adventures were successful. and a small victorious war where almost none of the germans died. that is , it added even more to the authority, it was even more to whet appetites, these ideas about expanding the territory for the spread of the german race and so on, that's how it is they propagated it so much that the propaganda was set up that it actually captured almost the entire german population, few could say anything against such daredevils , and besides, talking about intelligence and other things, er, alexander, if i'm wrong, you are me please correct me, it seems to be the 35th year. yes, there is an agreement between germany and great britain that as a result of this agreement, germany is rebuilding the navy , so there is no

need to even consider something. yes, here we can say that the such they pushed somewhere, they pushed, they allowed what was absolutely there. and putting it on the ground that alexander is talking about, we get uh, it seems like uh, heaven and earth were not even discussed. yes, they didn't even ask for permission from western countries. can we increase the number of ground troops there? can we develop our air force there? and it has come to the point that intelligence is not intelligence there, but already on the eve of the munich agreement , we are not even talking about pacifying it. we are talking about some kind of arms race, where western countries are looking at whether they will start this arms race with

germany, but such a large military power in germany appeared thanks to the students, because i saw you tell me the number. if it is not so, did chekhova have a well -armed and trained army at that time, she had 45 divisions, eh, germany had 47, but not enough armed ones, eh, why did czechoslovakia not put up any resistance , having such an army, where did hitler later built tanks, here we are talking about what we talked about before, about the fear of war, this is also, uh, to unleash this war there, this is again a certain pandora's box has been opened in the center of europe, here czechoslovakia was afraid to defend itself, czechoslovakia was ready

to defend itself, but czechoslovakia yesterday's allies forced her to do this , how did they react to the munich agreement in europe, quite widespread information about timberlane, who came home and said that he ended the peace, in fact, the war 11 months later, what happened in other countries in other countries looked at it through their own interests, i.e. for example, if you look at italy, this peace was beneficial to italy. because by signing such a treaty, germany expanded its spheres of influence, and germany was actually an ally of italy. they had a lot in common. hitler and mussolini also had something to say . about franco's spain. it's as if he didn't show himself as actively, let's say, as the mussolini in the second world war. but nevertheless, everyone knew that he had much more sympathy for germany, for hitler, than for hitler

great britain or france. that is, it had a huge geopolitical influence. look at what big countries were ready to either support hitler or to be neutral. e rome-tokyo and this meant that a group of powerful countries is being created that are ready to revise the world order, revise the borders , establish new borders of the new world order , as they want, instead of what was established after the first world war of the versailles-washington system, which was so laboriously created by france and great britain, in the united states, smaller states , such as, for example, belgium or the netherlands, they understood that their fate could be determined in 1-2 days, then this happened . when hitler captured these territories instantly, and france also failed

to put up the kind of resistance that france could have put up much greater resistance. but not everyone behaved as decisively as charles de gaulle , many did not want to put up resistance, and hitler with he easily overcame france, he did everything he wanted there. that is to say, thanks to this treaty, europe was ready not only for a new war, but for the creation of new orders, which most suited those states that actually started this adventure, most of the other states found themselves in a disadvantageous situation, they profitable because they were planned to be used by germany or as a resource what they wanted to do here in ukraine, in the soviet union and in romania, they also took away oil and resources or forcibly made their own allies, and accordingly later these countries are like hungary. she could not object to hitler until 1944. and what is this time in the union, because now in russia the munich

agreement is called the munich conspiracy. and what happened in 1939, how did they react there? we look at nadia and the soviet union through the prism of the ukrainian question, which ukrainian question was played out before, during and after the munich agreement, the ukrainian question - it concerned the soviet union, it concerned poland, it concerned hungary when i spoke earlier about the fact that germany skillfully played yes on national interests, then a large part of that game was precisely on the ukrainian issue, and when we talk about hungary, this is even before the event of march 1939 , yes. this seems to be the end of 1938 year that almost half

of transcarpathia is already occupied by hungary, poland is beginning to fear that this region of transcarpathia will not become some kind of new piedmont for the poles, so that then all western ukrainian lands will not unite around this region when the poles turn to the germans what what are you doing well, everything is fine everything is fine, you want, we will give it to you, transcarpathia is taking it away, but you give us these people, you give us access to east prussia there, and that is why this is where the game of the soviet union and germany begins, that the soviet union is trying to divert the honor from itself and send them to the west e- e germany realizing that they will not pull two fronts in the east and in the west. they are trying to come to an agreement with

the soviet union, and when, after the munich agreement, there, i don't know whether the next day or the next night or a week later , the idea of ​​occupying poland matures, then this idea also matures er, the enrichment of the interests of the soviet union at the expense of er , western ukraine and western belarus, that is, poland found herself between two very strong opponents. in such a case , what could she count on, such as help from england and help from france? existed between these states. and you see how it turned out in reality, treaties were signed, but they did not work, besides, the soviet union until the 39th year, until the people's commissar, who was maxim litvinov, a jew by nationality. pursued such a policy of e-e agreements with france and england so that they were to

prevent the outbreak of a major war in europe and when stalin actually addressed himself in march and said that he e-e remembered some pages of good relations between the german and by the russian people. this was a signal that it was possible to start negotiating. it was published in the press. then the jew litvinov was replaced by a molotov-molotov . he was the closest and most trusted partaparatchik to stalin, and at some point the germans realized that the union was ready to negotiate in the summer it was already clear and understood and in poland they were afraid of it because the agreements between the ussr and germany meant the division of poland, well, poland should have foreseen that if there are two such powerful states that have common interests on the territory of poland, it was necessary to be more active to interact with the french and the british to somehow come to an agreement, and the public opinion of france and

great britain was not ready for the start of the great war for poland, and only when the second world war began in september 1939, and then it was already announced, of course, and great britain, france, that they are entering the war against germany and then it has already started to escalate, they had every chance to preserve their statehood and put up a strong resistance there , by the way, there were more than 110,000 ukrainians in the polish army, this should also be remembered, and they fought in in september of 1939 for poland, that is, there was such and such a tragedy when germany attacked and then on september 17 there was also an attack from the soviet union . to try to negotiate with the peacemakers of such two powerful aggressors who were no longer able to restrain themselves, we have been saying this for 38

years, but the idea of ​​substantiating the policy of appeasement in berlin as early as february 36, that is, at least two and a half years before munich, was formulated by the minister of foreign affairs of the affairs of great britain anthony et al. let's listen to the aggressor identified in europe there is no longer any doubt about him the only chance to restrain him is the collective power of potential victims should be twice as large in fact not only on paper we are in the majority the armament of everything necessary is weaker than germany due to the delay in the start of our rearmament, germany will inevitably be ready for aggression long before we are ready for defense, that is, they understand what is happening that it is going to war and despite all this, at this time they are not creating a single military-political alliance who could stand up to hitler and they decide to feed him europe in pieces like this, like a blackmailer , yes, this is the last time i demand money from you again, i will not be the same again, here is another

piece of land, another region, another country one more particle and there will be no more of it, we will unite all our people in one state and we will all achieve our goal, it was objectively very beneficial for both great britain and france, for there to be a war between germany and the soviet union, it diverted the attention of germany completely from the western direction, but it must be borne in mind that there were such huge armies in both germany and the ussr that it was clear that it would drag on for years . that is, it is not just a delay on the moon for two to three years, it is a delay for years, but in years it is possible, for example to build something industry to receive the same american aid and this helped great britain in many ways that hitler attacked the soviet union and did not begin to implement the amphibious operation of great britain, which he also had in mind, and i would like to note that by pushing them to the east, the same france

she sincerely believed that they had a line of defense and that the german troops would not be able to pass through this line of defense, they would be there for a week, a month, six months, but what did the french get as a result, that the germans , having entered through uh, everything is possible there international agreements, treaties that they themselves had previously also actively signed, dipping their brushes in the ink, er, they crossed this belgium in a few days, occupied it and met the french at the line of defense, but on the other hand, throughout our conversation , they restrain themselves from drawing parallels from the fact that how about now, if the aggressor is given something to georgia in 2008, then something can be avoided in the future

, and if munich ah happened, munich 38 happened 11 months before the start of the second world war, and before putin's aggression in georgia, we don't tell russia what it is putin was also in munich. within a year, in 2007, putin actually announced the beginning of the cold war, a new cold war, and once again europe kept silent about what it was like. this is the same policy of appeasement. of course , it must be said that a lot of things have happened again, a very , very similar situation in europe. clearly underestimated putin. if he had been evaluated more soberly, then this would simply not have happened . obviously, in 2008, when there were events in georgia , it was necessary to react more strongly to it, to order russia and then introduce more serious sanctions then maybe those events would not have happened later in syria, there were no events in ukraine , but this did not happen. europe behaved condescendingly, condescending

because they decided. well, georgia is not such a big state. nothing special will happen there. well , they agreed. they agreed and agreed, and russia began to create frozen eyes. you see conflicts in transnistria, the issue there has not been resolved for more than 30 years, and in georgia and syria, these are all frozen conflicts at any moment, they can be revived, they can be ignited . when it is beneficial for russia, there is a very important moment putin said that for a reason, we remember her russia in the 90s under yeltsin , when she even wanted to she wouldn't have attacked , there were no forces yet, there was no army money was collected from the sale of oil and gas resources, but under putin when in the 2000s, a few years passed after he became president, that's their fat, it started to grow, and putin's statements, well, sometimes you just wonder how clearly it was said, then he did it exactly as he said it. europe underestimated and overslept. was it

the same effect peasants as he was with hitler's small georgia, then crimea, even more so, putin is exactly the same as hitler. he said that the russian -speaking population should be protected, and hitler said that the germans should be protected in the sudetenland, that is, change the germans, er , the russians will also be the same, this time it was from europe it's preparing for today's meeting there, looking at some material, er, some kind of déjà vu effect, that's all we 've already gone through. yes, it was all there, but it was n't then, not in the thirties. and it was. there it was, a year or two, five or ten years ago. and when we speaking for russia, it is possible to say that the events of 1990 and 1991 became for russia

what the end of the first world war became for germany we united, we lost pieces of our state, yes, let's rewind a little bit back to the 39th year of the molotov-ribbentrop pact, yes, and when we signed it there, what is it returning to him western ukraine , western belarus, returning the baltics , returning it to finland, when we look at the map of the russian empire, it actually is it fits so beautifully, but now it’s 90-91 years that once again the former russian empire , which was even bigger, was cut and even more was taken away from it, everything is possible, and as alexander says, the 900s were there there were some movements, yes, there was a conflict in moldova, a conflict in central asia, nagorno

-karabakh, and georgia itself, a little later. this is chechnya, it is all the components of one whole. what would have happened to that transnistria and then to moldova if, god forbid, they reached to voskresensk da in february or march of the 22nd year and reached to teraspol and setting up these corridors, what would happen to the south of ukraine, what would happen to the south of the odesa region, and so on, and so on , again starting there with the collapse of the soviet union, starting with the bialowieza agreement , and somehow, well, it is not written by such an unwritten rule e- one way or another, the world gave all the newly formed states under the influence of the russian federation, and the baltic countries were lucky if they were able to carry out these democratic reforms, they could escape from this

hell, all the rest, ukraine and moldova, and belarus itself, and those countries like the caucasus in central asia, they all remained in moscow's orbit. that's all there is politics and this pacification, so on and so forth. yes , there are some things going on in georgia, but it 's their internal affairs. events in the caucasus are their internal affairs. if only there was no war, that's what europe says. and you know, to understand how repetitive everything is. we have two quotes from putin and hitler. here is putin in munich in 2007 saying whether russia will use military force without un sanctions, we will act strictly within the framework of the international right, my basic education is still law, i will allow myself to remind myself and my colleagues that according to the un charter, in the case of peacekeeping operations

, the sanctions of the united nations and the un security council are required. the right to self-defense and this is what he tried to lead to in february 22, which allegedly was not an attack but self-defense and what hitler said hitler promised peace on march 7, 36 reaching an understanding international europeans, especially with neighboring western states , we have no territorial claims in europe , germany will never break the peace, all three and a half years remained until the uh, the bloodiest, not the 20th century. and the third time. well, in my subjective point of view, i haven't mastered it yet. because just the other day , another statement was made by one of the leaders of countries far from us, about how

good it would be for ukraine and russia to come to an agreement by territorial concessions on the part of ukraine, this made it possible to sign a peace agreement and everything would be good. how to call it, it is the same policy of appeasement, and we understand that these are the presidents and leaders of countries that are very far from ukraine, that are on other continents, to whom ukraine is, in principle, distant and quite indifferent well, after all, there are some principles of international law, so they must be followed, if no one will follow them, then everyone will start fighting with each other and it will end in a grandiose military conflict. there is something to think about. the world leader and all the leaders of the states, what has happened now is a good lesson, but not everyone has learned it to the end. and i kind of think that in many countries i don't even know what is happening in ukraine to the end , despite the fact that we are all trying to do it ways to spread it, but well, it is difficult to spread it in those countries that are very far

from ukraine, so our task is to continue doing it in all languages ​​and by all means on television wherever possible, and then there will be more chances that this lesson will be learned i am paraphrasing a quote from a german who spoke about russia, but this can probably apply to every aggressor and every case of the policy of appeasement, yes, as the iron chancellor said , what is the contract? there will be no treaties , they will still be violated

, yes, we saw this in the 1930s, this is what we are now seeing in the present. stories with the pacification of the aggressor well, see you in the new paragraph, the only main thing on the air is the channel we are ukraine and with you lyudmila dobrovolska and oleg panyuk good evening let's talk about what the new package of powerful american aid is about , why kyiv insists on un reform and what

mir offers a recipe after a six-month break , russia attacks ukrainian energy facilities again , how ukraine will hold the blow and how each of us can prepare for winter in one of the hottest areas, the russians are changing tactics as the armed forces disrupts the plans of the invaders report from scratch our defense forces continue the offensive on zaporozhye and offensive operations in the direction of bakhmut, the ukrainian military successfully repelled enemy attacks in the area north-east from grigorivka, malinka and krasnohorivka, this is donetsk region. well, they are exhausting the russians in the direction of melitopol, the armed forces of ukraine significantly complicated enemy logistics by taking fire control of the bakhmut horlivka highway heavy fighting is going on now in the area of ​​the ticks near the railway through which the occupiers supply

their fighters further operational situation on on the fronts in 577 days of a full-scale invasion, we are moving, we are moving, guys, and here throw p20 m. it’s so calm and coordinated. at the age of the third assault brigade , the boys fired at the enemy from andriivka. there are 10 m left and our positions. here they are already ahead. with a yellow flag, which allows us to control the supply routes to bakhmut, and all this time the enemy, despite the insane losses by storming the ukrainian military, to regain the lost positions and prevent ours from gaining a foothold , first follows heavy artillery preparation and from various artillery systems, then the aviation works and then they begin to break through after them. these assault groups sometimes even have up to 20 people. these groups sometimes reach up to 30, but all of them

are detected in time by our intelligence, retreating from