[000:00:00;00] which was already called the sword of the desert, in addition to artillery shells, 280 tamagalks, cruise missiles, which caused significant damage to saddam hussein, were released , i want to say right away that saddam hussein's troops had approximately the same number of manpower and equipment as they have now, russian the federation is in our, in the russo-ukrainian war, so let the people who watch and listen to us draw their own conclusions, whether 31 tanks in a rush from 3113 is more or less, i will only add that, at least from what the media write, it is even won't be, at least as of now 31 tanks, it will be less, well at least it was said that the usa, so far some of these promised tanks have arrived in ukraine, so it is even less, it doesn’t matter, it ’s good, they, they will be ready, they, it's a nice, powerful technique, but you know, well , sometimes our partners are offended that we're not

very grateful to them, we're very grateful to them, but come on. let's not behave like children in kindergarten either. once again, the same powerful group in saddam hussein and there in order to achieve victory was involved only avremov 3113. thanks for the realistic, realistic comment. well, i don't want to be offended, but we are grateful , but, well, we don't have to think about the fact that these 31 tanks, because that battle can significantly change the course of the war, fundamentally change the course of the war, our ordinary infantry, our ordinary boys and girls who bite the territory with their teeth and liberate our land, that is, in fact, in fact, we can say that this is rather such a symbolic step, because to count on some

powerful result that will change the course of the war for with the help of these few tanks there, it is not necessary, you know, our, our friends have a very fine mental organization, as they say, so if we say that it is just symbolic, they may be offended, so thank you very much for the help for the 301 tank, for tank battalion, but we have to understand that one tank battalion cannot change the course of the war, in which not half a million years are involved, or i understand that you are connected to something, thank god, right? yes i you i can't hear you sometimes but i hope it gets better i i i already quoted today, the latest review, today’s review, more precisely, the review of the institute for the study of war, it is noted that putin probably gave russian defense minister shoigu a deadline until the beginning of october this year to stop the ukrainian counteroffensive and return the russian troops, some kind of initiative to start offensive operations, does the russian army currently have the strength and

means... to carry out this order? eh , well, most likely not, because if she had the strength, the means, she would have fulfilled it, but here is the official notification that putin gave shayg's order, er, to stop our counteroffensive actions, or offensive actions, or rather actions, until sometime on the first or the 101st of october, is a very good sign for us, very good, if there is time, i will try. yes, of course, of course, why is this, for this is a very good sign, why, explain, yes, you me, please, look when a subordinate, well, in our armed forces, or in the russian, there are statutes in which this is also written down, he cannot carry out the order, well , his commander, he must ask, well , for example, the commander suggested that you get

a star from the sky, well, of course you can’t get a star from the sky, because you can’t disobey an order, orders must be obeyed, but a subordinate has the right to ask a counter question, i mean, of course there is a phrase written in the statute, i understand, how to do it, explain to me the ways and methods by which i should carry out this order, if the commander cannot explain, then you can not carry out this order, because there is no, well, there is no way to carry it out, and it will not even be a disciplinary violation, why did i talk about it for so long, putin gave an order which that he cannot... execute it, he cannot stop our offensive actions, why was it done, shai did not ask him again, and exactly how to execute it, he swallowed what will happen next, when the shayguns execute this order, then immediately skabeevo , solov, simonyan, the whole audience , who are engaged in propaganda there, will start telling us that putin is smart and great , well, we understand that, from their point of view, from our point of view it is just a cigarette butt, to put it mildly, there is

another definition that he gave normally . smart orders, he prepared everything correctly, on the spot, they simply did not complete this, these tasks, that is why we need those people who do not know how to carry out clear orders, we need to change or for or condemn, or shoot them or something else that they will tell there, which means, then why putin he does it, and he does it because, that is why it is useful for us, that he perfectly understands that the russian army is not able to stop our offensive actions, that is why he has already started to look for a scapegoat from the buffalo, on whom the responsibility for the right actions will be transferred of the russian army at the front. he did everything right he issued a clear order, as it were, the order was simply not carried out, who is guilty, those who did not comply. this already happened in this war, when they were guilty, well, general popov, yes, who was sent to syria, he wrote, turned to sheygu gerasimov, that they, the russian federation

, are losing our counter-attacks, well, they are losing counter-attacks, and there is only one way out 10 and above, that is, we are simply destroying theirs, means of impressing the artillery, what was done to him, they said that he was a ponikor. that he is, he was sent somewhere or to syria or something else, that's all pre-planned, but putin knows how to plan such things, it is planned that someone will be to blame for the fact that the order given by the great terrible putin was not carried out, so simple, so it means that putin understands that it is impossible to stop our troops, and started, and already started pointing arrows at someone, blaming someone, that's why this is a good sign for us. that is, it means that putin perfectly understands that he simply cannot be stopped, i have one last question, i hope we will have enough communication, crimea, today and my colleagues reminded, just now, and earlier in the special operations forces, they stated that

as a result of an attack on the headquarters of the black sea fleet of russia in occupied, in occupied sevastopol, the commander of this headquarters, viktor sokolov, was killed, and also, as reported, reported in the special operations forces, more 34 officers, well, it looks like it is a lot, but how critical are these losses for the russian fleet, explain to people who are not related to the sphere of the navy or the sphere of the army, how much damage does it cause to this whole machine in general? well , the damage is very great, first of all, the headquarters, headquarters is not an officers' club, where a large tseb, so to speak, generals and senior officers gathered to just sit, drink coffee, and here it flew. no, this is the headquarters, our headquarters, well , the headquarters starts with the unit, starting with the battalion. and people who may not fully understand, well, there are some large formations , then at the battle level everyone understands how actions take place there, even civilians, and they

understand that there are certain means of communication, certain secret ones, in this headquarters documents, certain materials that must be provided activity, well, for example, a battalion, what can be said about the entire black sea fleet in general, there is a very large number of secret documents, there may be, there could be ready combat orders, there is a lot of things, that is, it is a significant loss, a lot of things need to be processed or done in a new way, isn’t it clear what to do next, and most importantly, this has a very strong effect on the morale of the entire fleet, well, look, first they sank the flagship, well, usually according to the rules, well, it is written in the naval rules, if the flagship dies, then such a fleet disintegrates, well, it's the same, what to lose the battle flag-parts, well, they didn’t... they appointed that flagship , well, okay, in a year, well, a little more or less, you can count differently there, with, well, a little more, the fleet commander is destroyed, well, what midshipman is there , i think that there is a sailor, i think that it definitely did not give him confidence

that everything will be fine, destroyed the flag, destroyed the commander, destroyed headquarters one, destroyed headquarters two, sunk for the first time in history sank corlato rocket submarine, sunk... in the port, a large amphibious assault ship the ship, they destroyed the factory that should carry out routine work on the maintenance of ships, well, how does it affect, it’s okay, i think that there is not just a bad mood, there is a panic mood , i’m sure of it, but it’s okay , just imagine, they killed commander right in the headquarters, right during the meeting, this means that we can achieve to deliver them anywhere, at any distance, especially, i will spare the doomsday ships, you know, if we work, especially not only missiles, our sabotage groups, thank you, i just wanted to to say that this is just our connection, i see , to my great regret, to my great regret, our

connection has begun to deteriorate, but i think that you were able to convey your opinion, oleksiy hetman, military analyst, veteran of the russian-ukrainian war , we talked about the situation on the front line, we talked about the result that the presence of the abrams on the front might have. and talked about the latest events in crimea. thank you very much. well, we, we are going further, but before that, i urge you to subscribe to the radio liberty channel, if you are just now watching us on youtube, like this broadcast, in this way, you will support our work , well, here is an exclusive report by radio svoboda from the kupyan region, this is the kharkiv russian army, which has been accumulating forces there for a long time, in some areas the russian troops tried to push through the armed forces, but the ukrainian forces held back the line of this defense and stabilized the situation, how they are preparing for assault operations on the front line, and what is happening in the trenches was shown in a report by radio svoboda

on the 32nd . eat, what is your fraternity, go to the firing line, we are not afraid of mud, who took the firing line, fire at the advancing enemy, now the military is training, practicing assault actions, as if under the cover of harrowing equipment, occupying firing lines, this is what actually happens during hostilities on

the front edge, according to your assessment , how active is this direction, normally active, from different flanks, it is heavy both on the front and on the flanks, it is our heavy direction here. how do russian troops behave, what kind of troops are they, how does this happen, and to the rams who are driving forward, it is not clear what principle they are coming here and who is driving them here, well, in reality, the meat is simply for the help of technology. aviation, equipment, our mortars will work, artillery will work, our iron will work to help us, everything will be fine, training is useful, of course, useful, handling weapons, this is in the first place, that is, this is exactly what is needed for fighting, to stand in the trenches, it is also very scary there, but the enemy must be... destroyed, we

will destroy him, because we are on our land, we are moving now with the troops of the armed forces of ukraine on the front line, you can get here only at dusk or in the dark, as it is dangerous, and the russian army is also on the lookout, watching every movement of the armed forces of ukraine, and even so, when such movement is detected, it opens fire. hot position or not, it depends on the number of crows, so many funnels, so hot position, come here, yes, go, my dear, go, yes, i'm talking, said the paradox. ours start shooting , don't be afraid, go upstairs, there's only one way out, everything

runs into the dugout at once, yes, it's okay, be patient, be patient, thanks guys, which we replaced here, they were arranged normally, although there is no escape from hell for mice at all, but hey, this is their home, and the dog is contused. i lost a lot of fucking friends, many, many, and the missing ones are missing, i’m afraid to say, well, when you’re missing, you know that a person has died, well, there’s just no way, there was no way to take him from his position, i’m a friend. well, i know that he was wounded, it's hard, damn it, and i'm sure

that he's 200, but damn that territory, i was there, when i had the opportunity, i climbed for two days those fields, i looked for him, but i didn’t find him, my primary task is to bring all the guys here alive and get all the guys out, we survived from here, then - phew, we still haven’t found a single one... the russian army is currently capable of counterattacking in general, do any offensive operations, or just defense in depth? she can, because she has a lot more weapons than we do, but she 's currently, well, like, doing her accumulation, well, in some other directions, not necessarily that it's a counter breakthrough, because they they also understand what is coming to us a lot of foreign weapons, which are much more combative and much more accurate

than theirs, yes, they take advantage of the fact that they have a lot of shells, old weapons, and they use them, but our... troops, too, do not graze the rear, and they, too, give them a good deal, give them a good rebuff. the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, ruslan stefanchuk, doubts that the necessary 226 votes will be found in the parliament to ban the activities of the uocp, if the relevant bills are put to the vote. stepanchuk said about this in to an exclusive interview with radio svoboda, let's listen to exactly this fragment, and then we will discuss it. on independence day, deputies collected signatures in the verkhovna rada, for 125 signatures were collected at that time, maybe more, and they appealed to you to urgently introduce a draft law that would ban the activities of the moscow patriarchate. why don't you

introduce these bills look, well, i'm very surprised that there are 125 people in the house of commons who have never read a book that is called the regulation of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. because in this, in this small book , which can be given to a people's deputy in 4 years, it is clearly stated that i, as the head of the verkhovna rada, do not influence the agenda, the agenda is formed exclusively by the conciliation council, but i say it again, the parliament - this is a mechanism that makes its decisions collectively, and it seems to me that there are not yet 226 votes around such an important legislative act to bring it to the hall, to fail in order to simply sweat...' the russian federation, it's just senseless and legally and politically irresponsible, and you think there won't be 226 votes for a ban in the pcp. look, i really want to believe that i will see 226, but while the internal discussion is going on, because the discussion is not only taking place within the servant of the people, but

also taking place within the boundaries of other parties that position themselves as very patriotic, because, well, why? walk, if even in the faction we are talking about, there are current or former popes of this church, well, let's be honest, that's why there will only be 226, i think, a conciliatory council, once again i say, it is not the chairman of the verkhovna rada who forms the agenda, but the conciliation council will make a decision on the adoption of this law, see if you participate in the conciliation, well , yulia klymenko, people's deputy of ukraine, fraction voice, good evening, good evening, we called you , because you were one, one of the female deputies, among those who initiated the collection of signatures on august 24, on independence day, for the chairman of the verkhovna rada to submit for consideration bills that provide for the prohibition of the moscow patriarchate. remind us now how much did this initiative collect signatures?

at the moment 186 signatures have been collected, and i think we still have the potential to get up to 226 signatures and still get the bills to the floor, i want to remind the audience that these are all prohibition bills, they are there are a few, there is a government one, there is a deputy one, but they all passed the committee, that is, the committee voted for and for bringing it to the hall, why are they stalling, it is difficult for me to say, i am also present at the conciliation councils, since i am the leader, faction, and deputy, and actually speaking, i have been for a year i'm listening to the story that there won't be 226 votes. therefore, we will not bring it into the hall, and i want to say that in fact, the block , well, the agenda is de facto not formed by other factions, the agenda is formed by one faction, which is a monomajority, this faction is the servant of the people, with one hand on the conciliation council, in fact,

or they can be introduced, or they can be, if the draft law is removed from the agenda , therefore the illusion that the conciliation council has equal votes among different factions, i want to say... here is the thesis of mr. stefanchuk that there are discussions in the factions, but not in the factions discussions, at the moment, the voice faction, our faction signed, 100% of the deputies signed for bringing to the hall, the eu, european solidarity, 100% of the deputies signed, and even more than 50% signed the servants of the servants of the people, and i think that this is a lot other non-factional deputies signed this request to mr. stefanchuk to still bring these bills to the hall. i believe the potential is there, and why it is stalling is hard to say. i think the time has come, as the ukrainians clearly state in their declarations. that they want to see the ban of the moscow church, and it is not

because somebody wants to ban religion, i just want to emphasize that it has nothing to do with religion, it has to do with national security, we're going to get to that part of the conversation now, let me go back to the quorum, you just said that 186 deputies signed your initiative, ruslan stefanchuk, you could hear him saying that he... is convinced that there are not 226 votes, maybe there really aren't, if even then you did not collect 226 votes, you know, i think that this it takes time, because such collection is physically necessary go to each deputy, get a signature, some deputies are on business trips, in different delegations, that is, not all deputies are present in the hall, but i think that we still do not collect 226, and it will be possible to bring it to the hall, well, let's say so , this can be brought to the floor without us collecting signatures, we are simply collecting signatures as an argument for mr. stefanchuk that the time has come, do you have any thoughts

on what the real reason is, if you say that, that everyone refuels, more precisely forms forms the agenda, servant of the people and what ruslan stepanchuk, from his side, could also help in some way so that these bills appear on the agenda, they do not appear, what is the real reason that they do not appear? i think the reason is simple in the service of the people, there are somewhere around 20, there will be 20-30 people who are very, let's say, support the russian church and the moscow patriarchate, and i don't know how, but they still manage to block this decision, this is the first, and secondly, well, you know that other factions, like opzzh, for example, they don't have at all... they didn't

sign any, they didn't give any signature, i.e. this is a pro-russian faction and party that remains in the verkhovna rada and continues to lobby for the interests of the moscow church in ukraine, not a single signature from opzh or satellites of opzh, which have now split into several factions and groups, was provided, therefore i want to tell you that this is serious lobbying. let's say so, we can see the efforts of the russian church, the russian orthodox church, to request and preserve its church in ukraine, including among the deputies, i think that we are collecting as many signatures as possible, because it is unfair to publish there now the signatures of those deputies, for example, who would like to sign, sign, but they were not physically in the hall, or they could not sign somewhere there, we will collect signatures as much as possible, and then it will be obvious to the deputies who did not sign this appeal that they probably all - still support the russian church and want to preserve it in ukraine. but it is difficult here

to disagree with the chairman of the verkhovna rada when he says that let's imagine if the draft laws are put to a vote and it turns out that there are really no votes, a huge, you know, the russian federation will get a huge, huge card in their hands, and they will say, look, even the ukrainian parliament cannot ban the uocp, but some people want to. well, let's put it this way, then it will be obvious that there is a large group of deputies in the ukrainian parliament that supports the russian church and russian influence in ukraine, and this must be recognized and shown to the voters, so we will fail this bill, so all ukrainians will see who is who , and in the end they will draw their conclusions and stop choosing pro-russian canned goods again, i call them because they are not open, open, let's say, apologists, but a few of them are only open, all the others do

it absolutely, well, if consciously and quietly, then you have to face the truth, that means in our society, our society, we ukrainians elected such deputies, maybe then we should draw conclusions and not re-elect them again, please tell me, you yourself said that there are several draft laws, first of all, how many are there, because i heard there from three to 11, a large number, and secondly, to whom they belong, who are the authors, maybe the reason lies in the fact that there are no such bills from the hearing of the people, only there from european solidarity or from the vote, and therefore they are not put to a vote, no, in fact, a basic bill that has a consensus and that passed the committee , it was generally developed by the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, it was supported by the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, and it entered the hall of the verkhovna rada, through all the bureaucratic obstacles of the government and registration in the verkhovna rada, its number is 8371.

and it has sufficient prospects for to be voted on in the verkhovna rada hall. there is another bill alternative to it 83-71, the author is ms. sovsun, my colleague, and we are all co-authors of this bill. there is also a bill, 8221, submitted by knyazhytsky, from european solidarity. and there is also another draft law 8262, which was submitted by ms. stankevich from for the future , that is, as you can see, many draft laws from different factions and groups, as i said, the draft law of the cabinet of ministers has the greatest potential, since it was developed by him, and i i think that it is a reflection of that, since the cabinet is actually, a consensus of the monomajority, yes, the monomajority, it is appointed by the ruling party

, so it is their bill, and so actually i don't understand why they don't vote for their own bill, do you think, or now after this last the speaker's statement, will anything change, because i have seen huge resistance and criticism, especially from the opposition forces, after this statement? well, you know, this statement is not new for me, i have been listening to it for a year at the conciliation councils, the issue of banning the russian church in ukraine it became three months after the great invasion, that is, starting from the month of april , we are raising this issue. and on the conciliation and in the hall, so this is not a new question and the answer is the same that i get and my colleagues have been getting for a year, i think it's time to shift, and people's criticism and reaction is a clear understanding of how society reacts, it is the same, that is, we will prove the situation in the same way as we proved it with the declarations, you understand, when people will register petitions and demand to open

the declarations immediately, you simply cannot go against the will... society, if 2/3 of ukrainian society demands the banning of the moscow church and the cutting off of anything that reminds us of the russian orthodox church, then we must do it and stop hiding behind political slogans. thank you very much for your comment, yuliya klymenko, people's deputy of ukraine, voice faction, we were talking about the prospects of putting to a vote bills that would ban the moscow patriarchate in ukraine. thank you. and one more important event that took place today, to which attention was drawn today in ukraine, the kyiv court of appeal considered a complaint against the preventive measure of the oligarch ihor kolomoiskyi, they decided to keep him in custody, according to the correspondent of radio liberty, before the start of the session, kolomoiskyi told journalists that he expected justice from the court and added that he would be received under normal conditions, on

employees of the 1.1 tv channel came to the meeting, in particular, they were presenters natalie. moseichuk, alla mazur, yurii gorbunov, as well as ex-minister of culture oleksandr tkachenko. they appealed to take kolomoiskyi as a surety, in total , 15 people expressed their willingness to become guarantors. i am absolutely convinced that ihor valerych kolomoisky will not cover himself with a checkered cobra, will not imitate his illnesses, will not summon here, and bring here by bus some courtiers, you have no one under trial. will not burn tires and lick them, i am proud that i work for channel 1.1 and that the investor of this channel is ihor valerivych kolomoisky, because when he became it, we, the employees of channel 1.1 , got a lot of freedom, and at the beginning of september kolomoiskyi, i let me remind you, it was delivered suspicion of fraud, money laundering, then the court chose a preventive measure of detention

for two months, with an alternative, bailed over uah 509 million. the appeal is about this court