[000:00:00;00] and the trumpians want to throw out ukraine and include there the wall that is on the border of mexico and for which, according to trump, the mexicans should pay, but for some reason they do not pay for it , and in fact, they constantly, let's say this, call ukraine names, the same margery greaney called ukraine the one that deals with the trade of children and their organs, it is clear that all this is a lie, here, but it goes very well in social networks. and among those who do not understand what ukraine is and what it already has an unfavorable chorus. and actually we have several options. first, it was voted tuesday in the senate a resolution that can bypass this block in the house of representatives, provided kevin mccarthy is given the opportunity to vote for a similar resolution in the house of representatives. it is questionable here, because then he may

face the wrath of his friends, first of all the congress ... man gates, who said that we will, start the procedure of removal from power, he can go the other way, supporting the alternative project of the unconscious republicans and democrats in the house of representatives , which will bypass that one the draft law that is currently being considered, then it can be, well, another alternative option , that is, a positive one, but whatever, it means that this is definitely not the last struggle of this money that is currently allocated to us, it will not be enough, of course, for the following periods, 24 billion dollars , which, in principle, president biden invited for ukraine, this is definitely not the final amount that is needed for ukraine, and from the point of view of security assistance from the point of view of humanitarian and economic, that is exactly why there will be fierce battles, ukraine will constantly be heard, which means

in a negative context, well, i talk about the trumpians constantly, but actually they will constantly stir up this topic and push society and congress to deprive ukraine of such assistance. well, against the background of what is happening across the ocean, we see how russia is constantly saying that conflict and war on land or on land with nato countries is simply inevitable, yesterday the deputy head of the russian security council. federation dmitry medvedev once again said that such a thing is possible, and russia simply has no choice; against this background, shoigu visits a production factory missiles and says that they are simply increasing the production of their weapons, as it happened, let's see now. we really

hope that it has been recruited. will be preserved not only in the twenty-fourth year, but also in separate directions, they will be increased , although today i can say with satisfaction that our joint work with you is yielding results, here too we have an increase in production volumes not in percentages, times, all this is extremely in demand here... in the zone of a special military operation. your way, sir oleksandr, is a conflict between russia and nato possible, and in what perspective? i don't think it's possible in terms of it being a full-scale war. i think that the russians will provoke the western countries to some kind of response, and it can be primarily the baltic countries, and poland, or maybe

romania, and recently the fact that a civilian ship was blown up near romania, this is evidence of that , what the russians can do, because of course, despite all this arrogance and stupidity that we see in the leadership of the russian federation, they are definitely not komikaze, they definitely understand what will happen to them if they get into such a real and real conflict, so i don't think that anyone will react to such red lines, remember. china's warning, it's about the same if we struck the strategic aviation of the russian federation, and this is the only , let's say, the only condition, according to the doctrine of nuclear deterrence of the russian federation, which legitimized striking ukraine, they did not use this opportunity, it definitely won't be something of that type, that is, them absolutely, the rhetoric will be under, let's say

, raised. degree, but there will definitely not be a real conflict, they would like to create a situation of a caribbean crisis in order to then turn it into their own, let's say , interest, but so far they are not succeeding, despite their rhetoric, despite the nuclear training, bringing it into combat the state of strategic forces, deterrence, and so on, so i think it's just shaking the air and nothing will come of it, against the background of russia thundering its weapons and threatening the whole world again, we have there were problems with poland due to ukrainian grain, today the minister of agriculture of poland robert tellus gave a briefing after an online meeting with his ukrainian counterpart mykola solski poland believes that ukraine should withdraw the complaint filed against it in the world trade organization, because ukraine is trying to solve it in a civilized way the question of what the minister

of agriculture of poland said, let's listen to the minister of ukraine, minister solsky said that he will speak with the minister of economy of ukraine to consider the possibility withdrawal of this complaint, it would be good if we want to talk and i think we all want to look for long-term solutions, not just here and now, but solutions for a longer time, then this rolling pin is not needed because it is a kind of rolling pin. of course, we also talked about transit, we are in the final stages of negotiations with lithuania to transfer control from the polish-ukrainian border to a lithuanian port, control that will ensure that the grain leaves the borders of the european union. mr. oleksandr, this is official kyiv, between two lights, conditionally speaking, the first is our legal right to export ukrainian grain to the territory of poland, and on the other hand, the polish elections and the pre-election campaign that is currently underway there,

and the claims of polish politicians to ukraine. we, as a civilized state, are trying to assert our right in the court of the world trade organization, among other things, as it once was in the arbitration with gazprom. the poles say, listen, withdraw, it will pass here , i guess i will think, it will pass, one month, the election campaign will be over, the polish farmers will calm down, everything will be fine, in what is the way ukraine can protect its right and not quarrel with its closest neighbor, who has helped a lot during the last year and a half, well, you know, the first and most important thing we have to say is that the reason for this... is the armed aggression of the russian federation and the blockade our black sea ports , because there is no substitute for us to trade freely from our black sea ports on earth, that is

, it is impossible to transport it either by road transport, or over the danube, or by rail and road transport. the second point, we understand the difficulty of which is a government that has to show its voters that it cares, but on the other hand, you know, very much. the study of the kyiv school of economics was interesting, which showed two important factors: the first is that polish farmers currently earn twice as much, have twice as much revenue as before, and the second point is that the current dynamics of polish prices generally correspond to global price dynamics , that is, we did not collapse the polish market, that is precisely why we understand that this is politicization, i agree with you that somewhat rhetoric... ours can be perceived negatively and i don't think it was right, even so, to indirectly mention poland in the president's speech at the un general assembly, i think it was inappropriate, but

on the other hand, protecting our interests in the world trade organization is a completely normal thing, so i it seems that now there are talks about the fact that we will transit to germany and the baltic countries, and then the world markets from their ports, this is absolutely a good thing, we also have to remember that the poles, anything, they will to support us, since we are fighting their war as well, and of course we have to take into account the peculiarities of the national character and this honor, then we will say the way they behave, and of course that sometimes it is not necessary, we throw up a lot of anger, but on the other hand, we cannot and will say so, not defend our own interests, because we are not younger brothers or younger partners, and that is why rhetoric is one story, and how we protect our national interests is another

story, well and finally, you know, me it seems that it is very important to repeat a simple thing: for ukraine, tsenetsenia is an important issue , because we have lost a third of the economy, every cent that we... it goes to the fact that we continue this war and liberate our own territories, and for poland it is actually there is short-term political interest before election day. and that's why you can't compare the weight of the issue for both ukraine and poland. and, can this affect our accession to the european union, well, that is, now we have grain problems not only with poland, but also with other neighboring countries, that is, whether all this, all these issues will be removed as soon as the grain corridors begin to work normally in the black sea basin, in principle these issues will simply disappear by themselves.

well, you know, as the experience of finland and sweden during their accession to nato has shown, there will always be some issues that are not very related to this process in the same hungary, which blocked the entry of sweden, or in turkey, which blocked the entry, entry, of finland, that's exactly why we can't, or rather can't, hope that a guaranteed hungary will put sticks in the wheels, and they've been talking about it for a long time, and we we understand that hungary is putin's trojan horse in the european union and in nato, regarding the poles, of course, we also have contradictions, the same historical memory, and these warriors who are not connected with modernity and the future , but which have not been resolved and will not be resolved in the near future, there may be some other issues, since it is clear that in terms of the structure of the economy, we are very similar from the point of view of agriculture and our industry, so we are competitors partly, but i hope that the poles can be offered a model not only

coexistence, and a model of, let's say, singing, singing action, because our interests, in relation to other europe, especially old europe , they coincide, and therefore, of course, what would be natural for us, let's say, mutual investment, mutual consideration of interests, for that we become a powerful bloc within the european union and defend our interests, especially when we have such a neighbor as the russian federation, thank you, sir. oleksandr, thank you for the conversation, it was oleksandr khara, a diplomat, and a person who knows everything about foreign policy in ukraine. friends, we we are working live on tv channel as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on youtube, we are conducting a survey, today we are asking you this, are you ready for an increase in utility rates, yes, no, and your option, please write in the comments that these tariffs may increase, the minister of social policy said today and they said that there will be subsidies, well, that is, the topic is already starting when

government officials will somehow talk about the topic of a possible change in the tariff for communal services. further in we are contacted by a political expert, people's deputy of ukraine of the fourth convocation volodymyr tsibulko , mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, i am glad to see you on our air , congratulations, glory to ukraine, glory to the heroes, let's start our conversation with the strikes of the armed forces of ukraine, the defense forces of ukraine, on important military facilities of the russian occupiers, in particular, explosions rang out today in shkolkovo near moscow, this is near the chkalovsky airfield, this is the second time it has arrived there, and not so long ago, on september 18, saboteurs burned two an-148 and an-20 planes there , and mi-28n helicopter and of course, during the last week we saw how the defense forces of ukraine

strike military facilities in the temporarily occupied and annexed crimea, on the second day russian television shows the commander of the black sea fleet, the commander of the black sea fleet of the russian federation sokolov, they say he is not killed, he is alive, it is true that it is very strange that they are showing him, and we are watching a very strange video, after all, do you agree that ukraine is now starting to surpass russia in informational and psychological special operations, because even if sokolov is alive, we buried him a long time ago, and the russians are also beginning to doubt whether he is alive or not, well, even if sokolov was alive, then we were talking about two more generals, and

the generals are quietly silent about this, even well, information comes from the sources of sevastopol public figures that they quietly buried those present at the headquarters, the more so , what is strange is the throw-in, the canned shooting, where , in my opinion, the marine infantry brigade is awarded the nakhimov order, and this sokolov awards, precisely in the hall, the headquarters of chornomorsky fleet, therefore... and this is old, this is canned, well, it was on august 29, this information, and this video , that is, at the end of august, yes, therefore, therefore, in fact, ukraine not only holds the initiative in the offensive, but also the initiative in informing, after all, free media is free media, that is, there is more creativity, more freedom and, less fear in the coverage

of hostilities, so really, you just need to understand that russia is encapsulated, closed, and all our replays. coppery, they do not shake the so-called deep people, russian, that people are intimidated, overshadowed, he is snotty in a rag, and it is still impossible to incite him to take any action against the russian authorities. well, by the way, propagandists and propagandists actively work with this people, including olga skabeeva, who talks about how russia could come to an understanding with the united states of america. what she says, what she carries from the propaganda channels, we will hear, it would certainly be easier for the americans to understand us, if we took and destroyed kiev, bearing in mind that we can, in view of the fact that we do not do this, they sometimes

believe that we are not capable, so we are weak, exactly the same thing happens with the danger of a nuclear war, but if we have not yet cracked down on ukraine with such nuclear weapons, then... what problems do you think the russians have that they have not cracked down yet, as skabeeva says, it is clear why more skabeev, solovyov and the like, will decide that it is necessary to shake up the nuclear ashes as well, this is really evidence of their defeats not only at the front, but also obviously of such nervousness of the economy in russia, therefore, well, propagandists are usually playing in the ears of the russian population, but the point is that we should impose, er, their game on all possible platforms, from sports to economic, sanctions, that is, it is

also important to work with the national liberation movements of the peoples of the russian federation, it seems to me that in this sense we are not improving a little. and it is necessary to form a special program so that the enslaved peoples of russia clearly understand that ukraine is their friend. by the way, at one time yaroslav stetsko, the head of oun banderivska, who created an anti-bolshevik bloc of peoples together with marshal changkai shi, was engaged in this at one time, and the chinese, chinese nationalists... supported him, well, we know that russia still plans to fight in ukraine until 2025, well , at least serhiy shoigun talked about it yesterday, at the collegium of the ministry of defense

of the russian federation, he said that by 2025, the russian army will achieve the intended goals, that is, first two or three days, then two or three months, well, now it has been three years... like a year and a half of the war, putin has not recorded the goals of this one war first there was denazification, then the protection of the people of donbas, the right to the russian language and the like. but let's recall lavrov's recent visit to the un general assembly, where he suddenly spoke about the recognition of territorial rights. ukraine, that is, and even, by the way, in the russian public and in the expert environment, there are a lot of such messages about peace, that is, they are beginning to feel that the russian population is tired of this war, because it is without results, it has reduced

nations to impoverishment and in fact deprived of any prospect of russia itself federation, therefore, in this sense, in parallel with the waving of a baton by the shoigu, we are absolutely observing some military rarities at the front, but recently the ukrainian military destroyed the d-44 howitzer, this is a howitzer that was produced 80 years ago, during the second world war, er, this is the first, the second, this panic behavior with a choice, whether to announce mobilization or quietly contract. debtors, but all this shows that the kremlin clan is so confused in its... goals and in the way of getting out of this war, here they are, they

now, throughout their behavior, one can read the search for a model of exit from this war, but how can you exit this war without paying reparations to ukraine, without returning the occupied territories, the world will not accept such an exit from the war, and most importantly, ukraine will not accept it, therefore here they are, they are just biding their time in the hope that something will change, for example, trump will win in the states, if trump wins in the states, this does not mean that trump will say, well, take half of ukraine, you are good guys over there in moscow, and i am here, i am now helping ukrainians with a finger, let them sit and wear a cloth, it's impossible, so to speak, everything looks comical, well, but they, they pull, it's like, well, a cancer patient, all the time invents about the fact that some

the shaman will help him, there is no need to go to the doctor, there is no need to carry out chemotherapy, it is better to take time and then some shaman will come, give one herb, and everything, and everything will change, health will return, nothing will return, you have already mentioned lavov and about his statement regarding the territorial integrity of ukraine, but there on to the general assembly of the un, the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation spoke about the obligations that the ukrainian state took upon itself during the adoption of the declaration of state sovereignty, that is, as of july 16, 1990, and he constantly refers to this, he says, listen, well according to the declaration, ukraine should be a non-aligned state, although lavrov does not explain that at that moment ukraine adopted this declaration regarding non-alignment, regarding the soviets. this is not an obligation to russia, it is an obligation

before the soviet union, this is the first thing, and secondly, russia attacked ukraine in the 14th year, when ukraine was really a non-aligned state, he does not mention this fact, ukraine really was a non-aligned state, not only that, ukraine even ceded to russia, the contract for basing of the black sea fleet for 50 years, that is, in the 17th year, the russian fleet had to leave the territory of ukraine, we recall the kharkiv agreements, completely fraudulent, for which a lot of people have now been jailed, but they were jailed so diligently that some of those people who still voted for the kharkiv agreements in the verkhovna rada, and for some reason they are partners of the ruling servant of the people party, why would this happen, that's the question.

and why is lavov pushing the topic of non-alignment now, that is, in your opinion, moscow wants to return to the agreement that was not signed in the spring of 2022, when the negotiations began, and this point, by the way, was quite actively discussed then, that such as the non-aligned status of ukraine may lead to the fact that some guarantees will be provided to ukraine by moscow, flew to belarus flew to istanbul our there were interlocutors and these negotiations, and then suddenly, after the arrival of boris johnson in kyiv, all the conversations simply ended and there were no more negotiations, and putin just a few months ago was shaking in front of journalists this document that the ukrainian side said was not initialed, they want to drive ukraine back into this negotiation process with such conditions, and now... a pause is very important to them, and what their declaration of readiness to recognize the territorial integrity

of ukraine gives is a prolongation of long-term negotiations with the occupation troops remaining in the territories they currently control, they will deceive, the point is that the russians, russia and russia make no sense to conclude bilateral agreements, because in fact russia has violated a large interstate agreement. it violated it back in 2008, when the black sea fleet was raised from the territory of ukraine in violation of a bilateral agreement, because this agreement contains, for example, a clause on non-use of each other's territory in aggression against other countries, third countries. russia violated it, russia violated it constantly all agreements, so we cannot hold any negotiations with russia now, it seems to me that lavrov. probed the ground for the fact that they are even ready to leave the entire territory of ukraine, including the crimea, to ukraine, well, for

pro forma, for the destruction of their own population. they are ready to trade it for neutrality, so to speak, but he did not emphasize it much, in fact he tried, well, in the negotiations, there is a lot of insider information, now lavrov probed the situation for the world to refuse to prosecute war criminals, well and reparations, so that they were purely symbolic , that is, they are actually leaving ukraine, but this nazi russian regime remains, and then i believe that if we preserve it, it will attack in 5-7-10 years, itself the end of our program, i would like very briefly to talk about what happened in the parliament of canada, because last week zelenskyi was in

parliament with justin trudeau, and there was already a ukrainian veteran, yaroslav hunko, and he was presented as a hero, and then it turned out that he fought in the sss of galicia, and a very, very big scandal in canada, a very big scandal in russia and in the world, how is this, how did it happen, what do you say, who and how is fueling this, because in canada, the speaker parliament resigned because of it, and very. justin trudeau had to justify himself a lot, well, actually, this is a very strange story, because, for example, on the side of canada in the second world war, no less than 50,000 ukrainians fought, secondly, the sss galicia division, this is vafs, this is a field division, this is an army division , this is not a punishment,

these are not the ss, the ss, those classic germans , among... there were no national minorities, so to speak, these are exclusively german units, this , the wafs, is a linear, infantry division that took part in battles under the fords, it has been there for days she lasted three, was actually broken, after that internment, well, she stayed for some time in germany, nowhere in any documents of the nuremberg tribunal, the sss does not appear as war criminals, so this whole scandal, of course, he cut off, so to speak , with some additional, well, such media ones growths, that is, it is heated too much, but i think that the ukrainian community will find a mechanism to overcome this situation,

especially since there are many parliamentarians and ukrainians. in the current parliament. thank you, mr. volodymyr, for the conversation, it was volodymyr tsybulko, political expert, people's deputy of ukraine, of the fourth convocation. friends, we are working live on telekanaluso, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on youtube. please like this video and vote in our poll. we ask you about the following: are you ready for an increase in tariffs for communal services? yes, no, and your option, please write in in the comments under this video, about a possible increase or change in tariffs, today they talked at the level of the cabinet of ministers, so it is important for us to know what you think, at this moment 82% of the viewers we surveyed said that they are not ready for an increase in tariffs for communal services , 15% are ready. friends, read our news on the espresso tv website, watch our broadcast further, i wish everyone

good health, take care of yourself and your relatives, until the next program. goodbye, congratulations, ukraine is on the air, jafe rumero is working in the studio in london, today in the program we are talking about how and why ukraine is suing russia in the gas issue. the first stage of hearings was completed at the un international court of justice in the hague. in the lawsuit, putin himself used false accusations to justify a full-scale invasion. so ukraine's claim against russia is in the gas. ukraine