[000:00:00;00] that such a situation has arisen and china does not want and cannot and will not do everything in order to get stuck in the sanctions, that means things that are connected with russia and north korea, of course, that there is no, without china, no northern korea will not do anything, and of course they will consult with china and try to get some there, okay what they will do, i think these issues will also be discussed during putin's visit to beijing in october, i will not guess , but i doubt very much that china will still dare to have this transit corridor, that is, through north korea, and somehow support, that means, that means the plans of putin and kimchinin to exchange weapons against technology, against energy resources, against

labor. and tell me, in principle, to what extent can we now talk about the stabilization of the chinese economy after abandoning the policy of zero tolerance for the coronavirus, or has stabilization not yet taken place? stabilization, i think , is happening, because i saw a lot of reports that there is some kind of horror, even that recently in the capital of the former china's nanjing, nanjing er, it has stopped paying civil servants some kind of salary payments there and so on , chinese sources do not confirm this, here you understand, it goes, we have such a situation where the world always predicts that china will finally bend, which is called

, that was 20 years ago, and 10 years ago, and 5 years ago, three years ago and last year , and now it is going on, and china is not falling and not falling, of course there are difficulties, because , well, how they themselves they say and we understand it that because of this war, firstly because of the corona virus, then because of this war of curses, it is destroyed, that is, the logistics chains, and the corresponding production cycles are stopped , that is, everything is not going as it was planned in order to be fulfilled, that means that all of them - let's say so , offered to humanity by all this foam, maxims, global means development, global security, global economy, and also means fate, or rather, humanity, of a single fate, in order to do all this and make yourself attractive, in order that people saw example, look at how we live, what we have done, what we have achieved, what

reforms we have, how they work, and let's... come closer to us, curl up, so no, around america and around europe, with which by the way, china also wants to be permanent partners, and effective partners, and let's go to us and then we will arrange the same fate for you, because we are humanity, we are humanity of a single destiny, that's all, that's all, so, i think, says that these are informational entries. i cannot say that i clearly understand what is going on plan, it does not happen that way, of course, that these are all the plans for economic development, that is, the plans of the people's republic of china, they are deteriorating in terms of their implementation, in the sense of implementation by these circumstances that we are seeing now, but i am not sure that all that the press says, and i have evidence from chinese sources that everything is not right

, that after all... the economy is growing, maybe not at the pace that was set, we understand that there and they recognize this, the multifaceted problems with unemployment among the youth, 20% unemployed, so among the youth in china now there is, they are trying it, there are debts, there are problems in the construction industry, in the development industry, it's all there, they recognize it and try to sort it out somehow, but what you asked, i don't think that is how it is, i think that the economic growth, the economic growth of the chinese economy at this stage, it is going, well, not as it is going, but please tell me what you think about the political instability, the minister of foreign affairs disappears, then the minister defense, in principle

there was no such thing, i would say in favor. 40 years old to officials disappeared without any explanation , i remember it only there during the cultural revolution, that's how a person in a high position could disappear and there were no official reports about it, as if that's how it should be, well, disappear and disappear. what difference does it make to you where this official is, if for some reason it is happening right now? i think that here on individual examples of the same lishanfu, or that jingang, the first is the former minister of defense, the second is the former minister of foreign affairs, we see the corresponding struggle for the purity of personnel, without this, xi jinping has no one to rely on, and he wants... to make it so that, because of all the appointments he made, that is, after the 20th congress, the apartment, and which turned out to be wrong, and you know why they turned out to be wrong, they are now preaching such and

such a thesis , these are careless contacts, what of one, what of the other, which in fact we do not know for sure, but we can, therefore, predict that of course. and something is happening that forces you, sinzimpin, to take and take decisive, that is, measures to clean up your environment, we have information such that yes, that, so, foreign minister tsingan did something to somebody, this one did something wrong again, lishanfu, and i am sure that the conclusion should be like this, sijimpin, who, then, wants to be

the number two material zedun, and maybe even rather, who has turned the people's republic of china into such a locomotive as they consider progress, and so it is, to a certain extent, so that he remains the one who will be glorified in the ages, that is what we have in the cpc charter, we have, therefore, mazedun, we have deng xiaoping and we have xijinping, not jiang zziminya, no yayan shankuna, no, huaggofena, namely sinzimpinya, and he wants to remain such a leader, so that he is remembered as the person who led the country to the world leaders before the centenary of the founding of the people's republic of china. well, in fact, you think that this idea, which means three leaders for the entire historical period, is what forces him to take such steps, and what about taiwan, with taiwan, yes, he

is speaking, that is, at a solemn meeting dedicated to the 74th anniversary of the founding of the people's republic of china, again proclaimed the goal of reunification, and it was done in a categorical way, that is to say, this is the will of the people, and , well, history requires it, and historical justice, including, ah, we have to understand, that is, what it is based on, he is based on uh, the code, as it is called, the consensus of 1992, when the two sides got together and the pikini, it was the board: the heads of kagenergi shenkun and determined that there is a single china, and it was written there so that no one would doubt later that the interpretations of this statement united china can and are different, and they will remain so,

because beijing views one china as taiwan plus mainland china, and taiwan views one china as taiwan plus mainland china. each one of his column, relying on everything cenping not, as it was said at the 20th congress of the communist party of china last year, i do not exclude, at the same time, in the fact that he hopes, it means the will of the people, and the understanding of the people that china has to be united, he does not, does not object to the fact that , if necessary, military force will be used, and now he confirmed a couple of days ago, at this solemn meeting, that for under any conditions, china will be united and no force will stop

us from doing it in our plans, which means our aspirations, this is how he views the problem, because , well, in principle, we understand that what china , that taiwan is the only chinese... state, especially since if we take history, then when in the 49th year, then the kuomintang, then the ruling force, was forced to defeat. means the communist movement led by mazeduno to go to taiwan, to the island of taiwan, that is, marzida and changkaishi at that time, they considered china as a single thing, in there was no publicity there, there was absolutely no disagreement, it was later, when china had to change and changed taiwan.

at first taiwan was the republic of china, a member of the security council, and in 71 , that means the republic of china was excluded from the un, instead it became a member, a member of the un security council, the people's republic of china and since then, this is what, as i believe , so it is fanned from outside, all of them, 192 countries, with the exception of 13 and 12 countries that recognized, so the independence of taiwan and established diplomatic relations with them, they do not recognize taiwan, that ukraine, that the united states, that western europe, the formula is one, taiwan is an integral part of chinese china, the government in beijing is the only government that represents china, and there are no questions, and everyone confirms it, including the united states, now they also confirm it, but now with the fact that they need to have some kind of support for china, including of this nature.

the economy is one thing, and politicians are another, and they are not, you understand, such a situation that they give weapons, give, that is, funds for this weapons, and at the same time confirm that we are for a united china. thanks, that's the situation. thank you, mr. igor, igor lytvyn , ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine to the people's republic of china in 1999, 2001, co-chairman of the ukrainian business council, and now to another difficult situation in europe. this is serbia and kosovo, maria galeti, baltanic expert, candidate of political sciences in our language, congratulations mrs. maria, congratulations, good evening, so there could be a new war between serbia and kosovo, do you really believe in it, well, i don’t yet i really believe, it seems to me that in general parties they show wishful thinking because what we see is a kind of, well, in my understanding , a conflict, or a confrontation between

organized crime groups, well, what happened, let's say, is just the killing of several people, one policeman , who is a kosovar albanian, as well as three who live in kosovo, and we know that there were people present there who, milan radojcic, who is kosovar, is a kosovar who lives, lives and actually lives in kosovo and is such a leader in kosovo - in kosovo, but this person is very strongly connected with crime, with organized crime and it is said about him that he, er, has, has connections with the drug trade, as well as weapons, so it is difficult to talk about the war, moreover , let's say, if you look at what positions

uchich has, and also, after listening to what kurti, the prime minister of kosovo, says, it looks like the situation, well, on the one hand, the serbs are a little surprised at what happened, and on the other hand, the albanians somehow took advantage of the situation and for them it is very advantageous situation, because now, but kosovo is in a kind of not very convenient situation, because they do not have direct sanctions, but they have certain restrictions... on the part of the west and, in fact, for them any situation that provokes security in the country and causes concern of the west, in particular, we see the position of the states, the united states, is for this good for them, so here for me, it's a kind of situation that everyone who could take advantage of, but the question arises, how can you even expect any agreements between, serbia, kosovo, when every time any pretext is used to crush

tensions ? i, by the way, this is an interesting question, because in fact, it seems to me that in general, since the summer, approximately, neither the kosovar nor the albanian side is ready to reach agreements, the serbs have a very clear position regarding the autonomy of serbian municipalities, the kosovar side has no desire to grant this autonomy, and this leads... already to such a very, very serious conflict, on the other hand, of course, the leaders of the western world have given certain restrictions regarding kosovo. but they also took a rather positive position towards serbia, and this means that kosovo the party is losing its position that it achieved because of the war with serbia many years ago, and now it is actually difficult for kosovo to restore it, to restore the position that they

have, if they do not agree to the agreements that they once promised, because serbian autonomy municipalities, it was something that they promised, back in 2013, that's many years ago, and now they actually seem to have to fulfill what they promised, and in particular, not kurti, but his predecessors promised to fulfill many years ago, but they understand that it is not profitable for them, and they don't want to do that, if we talk about what may in principle happen in the balkans further with the serb-kosovo conflict, do you at all allow the possibility that this conflict will sooner or later... find some kind of solution? oh, this conflict is very complicated, and actually, probably , in order to solve this conflict, you have to work with both sides, i don't even mean serbia, but the serbs who live in kosovo, because the serbs who live in kosovo, there are a lot of

questions for the kosovo authorities, if you look at for example, some interview with them, and what to listen to what they say, they do not agree with the decisions of the government of kosovo and they do not agree in particular with those decisions that were made this year in the spring, when there was an attempt to impose, the board, the kosovar the leaders in these territories, where the vast majority of serbs live, and this is the first problem, that is, they have their own problems there, which must be discussed and solved, as it were, in order to reconcile both the serbs and the kosos...' the vars who live in kosovo, that is, there are also of course the influences of serbia, we we can talk about it, there are financial issues, there are other issues, but i think that the first issue is that, the fears that the serbs living in kosovo have about living in kosovo as a country,

and regarding the relations with the kosovars, and this and that, if we don't talk about it and don't work on it, then there will be no peace for anyone, on the other hand, of course, that there is a great opportunity for serbia, there is constant grassy tension there, and not only for serbia , for russia as well, because if we hold, if there will be tension in kosovo, or in the balkans, let's call it that, in general, it will always distract from other issues, in particular from ukraine and from, for example, the same karabakh or other territories where russia wants to influence, and where the west has its own... . interest or for the event, this is a security issue, and that is why it is such a very difficult thing, that is, it can potentially be solved, but realistically, if we do not work with it, this solution will never be, well, we are now also hearing words about that in the european union that

it is necessary to somehow harmonize ukraine and moldova as candidates for membership of the european union and the countries of the western balkans, who have been waiting much longer, and also have their own conflicts, if they are left out of the... field of view, then there may be a new serious crisis, which russia will take advantage of again, yes, i think what is this, this, this is one of the solutions, because now the war is like this , well, let's move away from the war that is going on in ukraine, from the military point of view, the war is going for the sphere of influence, ukraine wants to get rid of the influence of russia, and by the way , in particular, the balkans may be too, they are ready to get rid of the influence, in particular, in particular serbia, but because of that. what is in the middle, that is, we did not accept ukraine to the end, nor did the balkans accept it, that is, they remain as such, without hostages to the situation, that is, on the one hand, they need to maintain relations with various players, in order to, well just in case, everything, everything was fine, in ukraine

, the situation is different in ukraine, we have a war, and this war, it imposes on us, as it were, other demands, that is, we have no choice. in serbia, for example, or even moldova, which sometimes, well, she too makes such decisions rather in the middle, that is, they try to somehow survive in those situations, in fact, the easiest solution is to accept these countries both in the eu and in nato, in order to deprive russia of the opportunity to influence, uh, we can understand, some will say , there are examples of the same hungary or other countries where russia still continues to influence , but still this influence, it is already... everything is decreasing, much more, compared to when, for example, russia says: "well, we can claim these countries, c in principle, they were not included in their sphere of influence above, and we can" do some actions that are there, well, for example, to wage war with those countries, and well, let's see how it

will go, and therefore, for me in general the integration of these countries into the eu and nato, this is the only solution that can reduce the threat of wars in the european union, or in europe as a whole, if we talk about what is happening today with nato's intentions in the western... balkans, now it is said that there will be an increase in the number of peacekeepers, but it may be that serbia will provoke nato, to a real conflict, so that president učić, let's say, will score some new points, is it not very useful for him, i don't know, it seems to me that it is not beneficial for him at all, well, for example, let's see, well, serbia will start some conflict with kosovo and with nato peacekeepers, what will it do, but nothing? the last year , the last two years, the student has done a lot for the european integration of serbia, and he even

talks about it in his interview, but i tend to believe him, that is, he is trying to somehow go down in history as the man who brought serbia into the european union, if some war breaks out, he will go down in history as milosevic, does he need it, i'm not saying he's democratic. he is absolutely, well, absolutely not democratic, but does he need this history, does he need to repeat the history of milosevic, i think not, so i think it's more if the instigation of the situation in relation to what happened in kosovo , regarding these, if discovered, discovered warehouses with weapons and so on, but this is not a question that is useful for serbia. we can definitely say that now this conflict can affect the relations between

albania and serbia, because these were also quite good relations, both countries participated in the open balkans initiative, and now the prime minister of albania accuses serbia of because it is preparing for a new war , you know, in general, in order to say whether it will affect relations with albania, it is better to look at who are the kurtis, the kurtis? in general, a supporter of the unification of kosovo with albania, well, we know that there are many there, many ideas, great, great serbia, great albania, in others, others, is not the first, it is true in kosovo, there is a politician who dreams of unification with albania, but he really, really wants it and he is actually ready to do it, but he does not have enough opportunity to implement it, he , i think, one of those who would like to do it in reality , that is... and this and i think that in general this situation arose, the first thing that made me think that the first thing is an attempt to take advantage of

the situation and remove the eyes the restrictions on kosovo that the western world has imposed on kosovo regarding the unwillingness to negotiate because kosovo does not actually conduct negotiations, on the other hand, for me, this support determines that there is some kind of agreement between albania and kosovo in order to move kosovo towards unification with albania. and that's a problem, because i think if they start to move it, then the conflict that exists now between, the kosovo albanians, between, the serbs that live in kosovo, it's going to escalate even more, because they, that's for sure, what they don't want, they don't want kosovo to become part of albania, for example, and then they will lose theirs altogether if the identity is its own. well, to what extent can you say that some albanians live in one part of the balkans, others in another, that they have such

different identities, if i were mr. kurki, i would ask you, well, look, kosovar serbs are very different from kosovar albanians, they although they live in the same country, but they are two different worlds , well, i personally was in mitrovica, well, such a city that very... well reflects, if the state, the state of things in kosovo, these are very, very different e groups, and the problem in that, well, we understand that serbs speak, serbian language, kosovars or albanians speak albanian language, and they are very different, they are very different and precisely from the point of view of cultural, cultural, and also their problem is that serbs are afraid to live together with him. they're afraid that their rights will be, in some way, violated, and well, they'll actually end up

in a country where they, well, maybe, maybe, they 're afraid of what they've been doing. to the albanians, during milosevic's time, but that's another story, yes, that is, they are still worried and they are not ready, let's say to agree on some things that, to us, seem like, well, maybe, maybe normal, maybe like, they could coexist, because they are similar, culturally similar peoples, in principle, if we look at the general situation in the balkans, in your opinion, in principle, we can say that the countries of the western balkans, right? are they otherwise ready for european integration, maybe some are more ready, some are less, what is happening in montenegro, er, or with north macedonia, how ready are they? it seems to me that when we look generally at western balkans, i have a question, why is ukraine not a member of the eu , well, honestly, ukraine has done a lot, the western balkans themselves,

they have rolled back from the economic point of view, they have rolled back from the point of view of democracy, and when we say, are they ready to be by the members of the eu, probably, if we look at those first standards that were set, probably not, but on the other hand, we have to understand that in order to achieve some er, solution to this situation, to this problem that exists on in the balkans, we must look, probably differently, than it was before, and that's why i think that any country from the balkans is capable of integration if clear criteria are set, if there is a clear path for integration, because, for example, neither serbia is ready, even macedonia is not ready in economic terms, even kosovo is not ready in economic terms, but the issue here is security, if we want to see security in europe, we have to integrate these countries into the eu and

it is possible to set them some standards and others that were not there, which were not previously developed to other countries, so that they could achieve, economic standards, political standards , etc., that is, so that they could become full members of the eu, but this promise and this, this integration program, it will enable these countries to integrate and not fight among themselves, and this is the main thing , well, in order for them not to be at odds with each other, they should all be together there, either in nato or in the european union, and that, absolutely, absolutely, because they have so many problems that cannot be solved, it's even not a question of, for example, other countries where wars, it's a matter of the balkans, the balkans is an ethnically and religiously very different region, and each country, it has all these nuances, if we

look at bosnia and herzegovina, it has there three... peoples plus three ethnic plus three religious groups, and it is very difficult to reconcile them, they are all a history of wars, murders and not only from the 90s, we should look at the balkans in general, not only from what happened in the 90s, but look much further historically, that the same applies to kosovo and other countries, that is, it is very difficult for them to build these relations, among themselves, and in fact it is easier for them to simply... somehow erase part of the problems, such as borders, such as some ethnic issues, that is, yes gives the opportunity to lose a little of this, of its own sovereignty, as well as its identity, but on the other hand it gives an opportunity to move on, and if they get rid of all these emotions, emotions, i mean historical, ethnic, they have a chance to move on, if they don't

get rid of it, then this is not a passing war, it will come sooner or later . it will be very possible unexpected, perhaps very strange, but it will appear out of nowhere, because these emotions are present and they constantly provoke conflicts. thank you, thank you, ms. maria, maria geletti, baltanitska expert, candidate of political sciences on our air, and now we will take a break for literally 5 minutes, don't switch. my dear, we waited for you in the garden, but something hurts your back, with ham bone ointment, and you will help me like a young man, ham bone ointment from dr. tais, a german ointment for joint and muscle pain. the chamois returns the movement. from pain in joints and muscles, natural mats from the liver bone