[000:00:00;00] they deploy on the 90th day, or should we say what will happen on the 90th day, when these nareaction forces, and at the level of brigades, or rather battalions and later brigades, will deploy and be able to retaliate against the territories that were occupied, we have seen, i also said about it, irpien, bucha and dozens of our settlements, which have already been liberated, what is happening to the civilian population, understanding that all countries, citizens of the baltic countries, i emphasize... the baltic countries, the baltic countries are viewed as unequivocally nazis, fascists and the rest, they will simply be physically destroyed, and my baltic friends , with whom i spoke literally today, clearly give themselves, are clearly aware of the prospects with which they will face, nato will simply come to the already razed territory and there will simply be no one to restore and protect there. thank you, thank you, mr. serhiy, serhii grabskyi, military expert, timely peacekeeping missions, colonel of the reserve

of the armed forces of ukraine. and now we will move on to ukrainian-american relations, to american politics as such, because it is raging, just igor eisenberg, professor university in our language, congratulations, mr. igor. greetings, mr. vitaly, greetings to all viewers. so, let's start with helping ukraine. we see that now the speaker of the house of representatives has been removed from office. there is no permanent budget, there is a temporary option for 45 days, there is no understanding how quickly. the house of representatives will want to elect a new speaker, how quickly the process of a new speaker will end, and most importantly, there is not even a question of how much the new speaker will be willing to cooperate with the administration to pass a new budget, and how much he will be ready for this new budget to include some articles related to aid to ukraine. and here the question is quite simple, whether the administration can provide this military aid without real

approval. congress in the united states, what does the president of the united states mean when he talks about some additional tools? well, the tools are there, look, there is a reserve fund of the budget, which is always there, which, by the way, has already been used for military aid to ukraine, because both in august of 21 and in december of 21, president biden approved the transfer of weapons and ammunition to ukraine from the pentagon bases, and this was provided by the reserve funds of the budget, so that the congress did not specifically allocate money to ensure this, then there was an initiative to help ukraine in the field of security, it exists 16- th year, but there, there used to be 250 million, then 300 million, and this is money that went to order weapons from manufacturers, weapons and ammunition, from manufacturers, and they are still used that way, but here is what was transferred from

the base pentagon , it was financed then with reserves for the budget, they can be used now, but these are limited funds, because of course the president cannot take very much from there, then here he is, he took 60 million once, then 200 million, that is, if we calculate it at today's needs, today, as a rule, one aid package, when weapons are transferred and ammunition is transferred from pentagon bases, it 's about 300, 300, 400 million, that is , it's limited opportunities for that, i think there are other potential opportunities, as far as, i i understand, let's say, there can be a loan under under the guarantee of the government of the united states, ukraine was given, let's say, and i later, when , when, when we have a normal house of representatives, then maybe it passed a law that

the united states itself this credit and finance... we can talk about the use of russian money, which is frozen, seems to be 300 billion dollars, although more, the overwhelmingly larger , larger, much larger part of it is in europe, but in the united states they are, that is, there are, there are various conversations about how to confiscate them and transfer them to ukraine, you can so, for sure, for sure to do it, let's say, a professor of law at harvard university, lorenzje, has repeatedly said that since this money is not private property, the united states can confiscate it, if it were private money, then it could not be done, since this is public money of the russian federation, then he believes that it can be done, and it will be impossible to challenge it in american courts. i think that the administration

is thinking about what it can do in such categories. but of course, what is happening in the house of representatives, it is terrible, of course , and it is terrible for ukraine, it is terrible for the united states itself, because it is chaos and when it will end, it is not on... it is clear, it is not even clear , will it end at all with the election of the speaker, because if , for example, jim jordan is elected speaker, well, i have a very hard time imagining what we will then have, we will have a solid hoss all the time, it's just that the congress just won't function because he he will not make any laws at all, there the house of representatives will adopt something so ideological, in order to be just propaganda in front of their voters, so that far-right republicans can report that they are good, but it will never become law, and jordan, jordan openly announced a couple of days ago that he was against

congress approving aid to ukraine. in your opinion, in principle, it is possible to elect such a speaker of the house, given that republicans have different ideas about what the leader should be lower house well, he can't say, not the head of the house of representatives, but i apologize for, uh, come on, let's just think, but in such categories, there are two candidates, there is jordan, he is a very far-right politician, in fact, i would not even consider him a politician called, just a person with absolutely far-right views, with the appearance of trump in politics, he simply became his, well, if not his right hand, then a very, very important, important tool for trump, by the way, trump this morning already under...' got jordan , as a candidate for the post of speaker, is steve scalise, the current leader of the republican group in the house of representatives, who is a right-wing politician, i would say very right-wing, but he is still a politician, so if he were

the speaker, he would still be concerned about keeping the house of representatives as an institution and an authority, which means that he should be concerned about the work of the house, that is, that it passes laws, adopts. on the same budget, which is her constitutional obligation, and as for the chances, i think that since trump supports jordan, for the republicans who have the majority, who can in principle take the speaker with that majority, vote against him, that currently means to go against trump, to go against trump in today's republican party means to have a very good chance of simply falling out of republican politics, because if trump doesn't like a member of congress, whether it's a gop member of the house of representatives or a senator, he simply puts his proxy

against that person in the gop primary. and it ends the victory of a trump supporter, because simply the majority of republicans support trump, and so people like lee cheney and adam kinzenger have fallen out of republican politics, they are not in the current congress. simply for voting to impeach trump, for serving on the committee investigating the events of january 6, 21, and several of their colleagues, likewise, they were kicked out of the house of representatives, the same can happen to any - some moderate republicans who do not support jordan, although in principle six votes, even five, er, among moderate republicans against jordan is enough to keep him out of the speakership, but in that case, it's still going to be such a very long spook-fest because, well, democrats, i

could imagine , that a part of the democrats could support some republican candidate without them, at least simply by not participating in the vote and thus lowering the threshold necessary for election, and if such a candidate promised them something, let's say, also the approval of... the approval of the budget for help to ukraine, the adoption of a normal budget for the entire next year, the financing of those programs that, according to the law, should be financed, that is, let's say the reconstruction of the infrastructure, state investments in the microelectronics industry and so on, what the previous congress accepted, for today, at least i do not see . that the republican-republican candidates for speaker made such promises to the democrats, and it is obvious to me that mccarthy did not make any such promises either, because if

he had made them, then the democrats could consider whether they simply did not vote when there was a vote on the removal of makarta, simply part of them could not vote, and since he did not promise anything and did not offer anything, then of course they voted for his removal, and they did not will help any republican candidate to become speaker unless they see that constructive work can be expected, and you do not think that it would be beneficial to the republicans in principle to keep... the current speaker in office, simply so as not to create chaos in the house of representatives why didn't they do it even without the promises from kevin mccarthy you mean a democrat of course i'm sorry i think look even lees cheney today she spoke out she supported the democrats they voted for the removal of mccarthy, because precisely because he promised nothing, and actually, look. he's playing his game, even with this passage of the interim budget

, what congress passed last saturday, at the last second, literally, he could have done i don't know, three months ago, because it's just continuation, continuation of the proportional effect of the previous budget for a short-term period, he did it at the last, at the last minute, and he from there, he removed aid to ukraine from there, i probably think so, well, this is my personal opinion, that he was counting on... that because of this, these far-rights who proposed to remove him, that they will not do it, well, he miscalculated here, and whether it was beneficial for the democrats to keep him in the position of speaker, i'm not sure, well, because because he, he was very weak speaker, he did not do what he was supposed to do the speaker, because in the american conditions the speaker of the house of representatives is a very important position, it is not a person who sits there in a chair and in meetings, it is the easiest thing to do,

in fact the speaker should, his main job is that he should ensure the adoption laws the american parliament is bicameral, that is, the house of representatives can pass a law if the same law is approved by the senate. in the senate, people are much more moderate, on both sides, in both parties, senators, a large majority of them, a large more moderate than the members of the house of representatives, and the senate can approve something, only on a bipartisan basis, because there 60 votes out of 100 are needed to approve anything, no party, there are no 60 votes in the senate, so the house of representatives has to pass laws on a bipartisan basis, that is , such compromise laws that are approved by the senate, and mccarthy is practically him, but he does not work in this direction. during his

short tenure, two laws were passed on a bipartisan basis, this is the law that decided for two years, the problem of the national debt, which was also adopted at the last minute, and here is this temporary budget, which, in fact, is a shame, this temporary budget, which was also adopted at the last minute, no more law that would require cooperation between parties was not accepted, and the fact that the aid to ukraine, which we, mccarthy, slowed down, and which because of him was not included in this temporary budget, you understand, when mccarthy speaks at a press conference after his resignation, and absolutely correctly compares putin with hitler, absolutely correctly compares what russia is doing now with what hitler did in the late 1930s, and he also says it, i think he sincerely says it, and he understood it before, but when he was still for... for

two days before that, he absolutely deliberately made it so that aid to ukraine was not included in this temporary budget, this is such pharisaism and i would say that, well, it's a shame, it's just a shame, a shame for the country, not only for mccarthy himself, i'm sure , that he is an educated person, he and he showed simply that he understands everything very well, but his actions when he was the speaker, they contradicted his understanding, everything should still be in politics, i understand that flying... can be dirty, but there should be morals, especially in such situations as in the situation in which we all live now . thank you, mr. igor, igor eisenberg , a professor at the university, we were in touch on this broadcast, we will now take a break for just a few minutes, but don't switch, no. bookforum festival of culture and literature. it is coming back, live in

lviv, online in the world, foreign and ukrainian authors, book fair, discussions that change the future, a new location in the center of the city, a powder tower on basement street. october 4: 8, come, admission is free, details on the bookforom.ua website. when civilization is destroyed. a teenage girl may be humanity's last hope, watch the hbo series that took the world by storm. the last of us, exclusively, in subscription. viyakarpattia forum presents a unique book event , a literary and artistic meeting word in war, exclusive conversations with military writers and volunteers. book review, author's presentations, special children's program of performances by the bards. october 14 and 15 in ivano-frankivsk, the square in front of

the drama theater. word in war. on via karpattia in ivano-frankivsk. talented, relevant, truthful. with the support of the ukrainian institute of books under the protection of our military. oh, there are no potatoes, you’ll bring them already, ass, something has caught , i remind you, dr. tyss’s ointment with comfrey and you get up to work again, comfrey ointment is a german ointment for pain in the joints and muscles, oops, comfrey returns, from pain in the joints and muscles, natural mats of the tendon from dr. thais, ask at pharmacies, the antz pharmacy, the kopiyka pharmacy and the sharz pharmacy with a 100 g quince bone, with a 15% discount. i flew, flew, and the cough stopped me, cough is a symptom of a respiratory disease, so we treat it respiratoryly, we do inhalation of lord hyal, an inhalation agent for cough, lord hyal is a direct way to expel phlegm. when pain stops time, choose afida max with arginine. in sachets faster than in tablets. there are discounts on afida max 10% in

pharmacies, travel stores, bam and savings. there are discounts on samples, 20% in psarynsky, bam and oskad pharmacies. the war continues, and not only for territories, this is also a war for minds, russia is throwing millions of petrodollars to turn ukrainians into little russians. ukraine will become, analysis and analysis of information about ukraine by russian propagandists, specific facts and methods by which enemy propaganda turns people into obedient zombies. they plan to vote for the historic reunion. countering russian information attacks in the chronicles of information war project with olga len. tuesday, thursday, friday at 17:10 on espresso tv channel. every day, every hour, every minute we receive a large amount of information. the most anticipated

event of the year, what is actually happening at the front, what are the losses of personnel and equipment on the battlefield. how does the international community evaluate our successes and what is moscow lying about? from the stream of news coming from all over the world, we single out the most important ones. the world is closely watching whether there will be weapons for ukraine and what kind, and what the russian occupiers are whispering about behind the commanders' backs. news, summaries of the week - this is a review of only important events, significant, reliable events, this is analytics, fact-checking, professional comments. that's about it many more in the release today. about important things in simple language available to all viewers. greetings, iryna koval is in the studio, and these are the results of the week on the espresso tv channel. news, summaries of the week, every saturday at 21:00 on espresso. every week, the saturday political club helps to understand the processes taking place in ukraine and the world.

vitaly portnikov, host of espresso and invited experts, based on facts, give their assessment and developed forecast. events, want to understand how our today will affect our tomorrow, watch the saturday political club, every saturday on espresso, we continue our information broadcast on the espressa television channel and now we will talk with the russian oppositionist, former member of the state duma of the russian federation, ilya panemarevo, congratulations ilya, good evening, well, i want to start with one. an important topic, in the actual call to raise money for your murder, as well as for the murder of garry kasparov and evgeny kiselyov, which was made recently, you laugh, but this call was made on the state radio of russia, on the state radio of russia they called on people to come across as a killer for you and your colleagues , what does it look like, well, come on, that

has never happened before, well, everything is bad if they are already calling to collect money on the state radio channel. that is, it means that the fsb is not working, and this is of course, well, very good news. please tell me, in principle , to what extent is this speech by vladimir putin at the valdai club an important such moment for you from the point of view of what was said in this speech? well, i think it 's very important that he, he took the blame, for the murder of a handsome man, well, what he... said about those grenades, about what there wasn't , what kind of external influence there was, it just determines that it's him. and i think it's important, why did he need to say that, well, i think, to

emphasize that he's in control, and that he actually got this decision, and that defines what he actually does not control the situation, because always what he says , well, it is this, it should be perceived the other way around, and it is important, very important, i think, well, in principle, if we talk about what happened with the fact that he had to actually make excuses for this death, beauty, why did he even decide to talk about it? i don't think that's an excuse, again, it's the opposite, it was his initiative, there were no questions about it, he started talking about it himself, and he, well, gave the least likely... well, because everyone saw that video

, how this plane fell, that it did not have a wing there, well, with a hundred percent probability, it could not have been an explosion in the passenger compartment of this plane, and this i believe, it is deliberate on his part, he did not say about those landing gear there , anyone there, he didn't say about... about anything , he chose the least likely version of it, and because of that he said that it was me, if we talk about political theses, there was something that could be considered certain signals, well or changing the course or its stricter implementation, which is generally important, well , a certain signal, i believe that he said that he is no longer against ukraine being a member of the european union. he said that we didn't care, well, he lied again, that he

always didn't care, because from the very beginning in the 14th year, well, in the 13th year, when there was this european association, it was precisely because of ukraine's desire to join europe, and everything started because of this, but now he says that we don't care about it, only one thing is important to us, that ukraine was not part of nato, and this is a certain change of position, i here... i don't even know whose influence it is, i think it's probably the americans, or maybe it's from turkey, but i think he's looking for some scenario to offer the west, some path to victory, it needs negotiations, it needs a truce, because it will lose the war, to what extent such a truce can be accepted by the west and ukraine, because the question of a truce always arises, it is, as the president of ukraine says, an opportunity for russia to move to a new accumulation of arsenals, to a new accumulation of resources, well, i 100% agree with

this position , i believe that now it is simply impossible for these negotiations not to take place, because there is no position that suits ukraine, but there are certain people in the west, first of all, mr. burns in the united states, they believe that the negotiations will definitely take place and what do you need to move in this direction, they believe that there will be no military victory over russia, and putin is trying to play in this direction, if we talk about the extent to which the west is really ready for any consultations with moscow, is there such a possibility that such consultations will really begin, well, they are not ready to talk about it frankly, and they are not ready to call for it. but i believe that they are creating a certain pressure on the ukrainian leadership, well , they understand that it is necessary for

ukraine to recognize that this is the way to proceed, i believe that in general there are all these discussions about the elections in ukraine, it is all part of the same thing, to prove the situation, to end the martial law there, and to start negotiations, well, at the same time, it is also necessary from the point of view of the americans... his own election races there, and there biden needs to say that we have achieved a certain result there, well, they are moving, and that is why putin said about it, master it, master it, westerner, foreign political experts, that is, people who can theoretically influence the position of their own in their countries leadership in principle, if we talk about what can happen after this

performance, some backstage negotiations, or is it all just an illusion. of course, this is an illusion, well, but again, this is an illusion that is supported by certain influential people there, and there are, and, as i said, official structures, in washington, there are also unofficial experts, there are various putin fershters that exist there, there are many, many such people in europe, it is simply not popular now, they cannot help but go against their own society. there average americans do not support this position and average europeans do not support this position, but the politicians who are spending money, who are losing their popularity, who cannot achieve the result of final victory again, well, they want something to happen and so that they can say, well,

thank god, we solved it and let's move on to other issues. what is the situation in russian society in general, i saw this statement by the director of ftsion federov, who said that it seems that only there 25% of russians want the continuation of the war and generally want military action, why did these people become such people from the point of view of the state, this is so little, again this is a certain signal from the point of view of the whole, and it is also important, it is a state, a state institution, that is , what it says in general is the position of the kremlin, we should perceive it as such, but the real situation is that the vast majority of russians are quite indifferent to what is happening in ukraine, no, no, because they are not interested in it, because they do not see how they can influence the situation, they understand that it does not depend on them, and in fact

, you don't need to think about them here, you need to think about the elites, and the elites read... they read the foreign press and they think that we just have to wait, and that sooner or later, the negotiations will begin, and this is exactly what i believe is the most destructive, destructive moment that we need influence, it is necessary to emphasize that there will be no negotiations without victory, and that in order for them to begin ... in order for the war to end, changes are needed inside russia, a change of power in russia is needed, while putin is there, while his administration is there, this war will not end, that is the understanding it needs to be spread in the west, well, i understand about the west, but here the question arises, to what extent putin himself is ready to talk with his society about the situation that has developed on the ukrainian front, he

tries all the time to pretend that everything is fine, and here it turns out ... that not everyone wants the continuation of the war, well, 70% of society is a swamp, well, just simply a swamp, they can have a negative attitude, i believe that they have a mostly negative attitude, they want and long for peace, but they do not understand how to can be achieved, if peace can be achieved through victory, well, let's fight, if peace can be achieved through surrender, let's surrender. but that it is none of their business, they think that it is putin who should do it, but they are tired of the war, well, it is obviously growing, and people want to return to normal, to normal life, but how to achieve this, they just they don't know how real the chances are

today to hope that putin will suspend hostilities, simply because russia will run out of some material resources resources for the continuation of such a high-intensity war, is it possible to calculate whether it will happen or not at all and when it will happen? i consider 0% of this probability, they have enough material resources, and even if we look at the next year's budget, there is a substantial increase in military spending, they are now devaluing the ruble precisely in order to have more funds to finance the war, well, and military production, well, they will continue it, sanctions will enter, they can, in order to get certain microcircuits there and everything else that is needed for the production of rockets, well , social programs, they may theoretically suffer, but i believe that it will not be some kind of radical reduction of them, so far there are