[000:00:00;00] because between us, who have questions, and andrii, who can give an answer, there is this wave, and what should we do so that the waves do not prevent us from understanding each other, because obviously the issue of communication with our colleagues from russia, with the russians, it must find some form, but for now between the one who wants to ask and the one who is ready to answer, this senseless aggressive wave will grow. nothing will happen, and here is an interesting question, where does this wave come from, and i, as a person who survived the russian wave, it seems to me that we need to think whether there, too, there is no structure or configuration of the information space that we do not notice, and where we are also its masters, who will support all this, olenka, thank you, we talked about the lviv

book forum, i will also say about these literary , on the one hand, yes, they popularize literature, popularize, popularize reading, of course, but on the other hand, let's reduce the degree, and to reduce it, quieten it down, i suggest just before you are going to write in yourself on some topic facebook, instagram or twitter, please study this topic very well, and maybe you don't know it a little well, look at all the speakers who talk about... the topic of people who do literary work professionally, maybe your point of view is really too emotional and you will change it when to investigate this situation, and it is definitely worth going to the book forms, but consider that we have our writers, some of them were, and have already increased their popularity so much that sometimes you need to come even 20 minutes

before the event, or take a seat, because i recently i was in kyiv at a performance by oksana zabushko, i was a little late and had to sit on the stairs, because ms. oksana, mr. andruhovych, and mr. zhadan and everyone are already rock stars, it’s very cool, so go to book events, they are extremely interesting now. that's it, i'm with you friends, goodbye, stay with the espresso, see you. baby. caught the virus. mother vera has faith in dekasan. inhaled dekasan enters the lungs, where the virus is. dikasan works, mother vera is happy. dekasan is an inhalation agent against viruses and bacteria. dekasan is an inhalation antiseptic. when the pain stops time, choose afida max with adginin. in sachets faster than in tablets. there are discounts on afyda max, 10% in pharmacies, travel stores, bam and savings. stress. there are discounts on glicesed and

glice tablets. 15% in psarynyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. the roof is a project about the feeling of home, about our roots, about identity, it was a child who built the house behind us, my great-great-grandfathers, about what the old ukrainian architecture brings to us today? good architecture, not necessarily... done with an architect. churches, mills, huts, mazankas, it depends on us whether these buildings will slowly fade into oblivion. the wooden church is a phenomenon, indeed. it is still alive in the ukrainian village. will we still preserve our past? there is legislation, why does it not work. we have a democracy, where whoever wants, does so. about ukrainian folk architecture,

its features and. by way of salvation in the documentary series from the ukrainer project on the roof on saturday at 11:15 on espresso. collaborators. who surrendered ukrainian cities to the russians? ukraine is a state, a terrorist, we have been convinced of this since the age of 14. but how to sell your own conscience for small rubles and fake positions. our future is with the russian federation. we should know right away. face to face, watch the collaborators program with olena kononenko every wednesday at 5:45 p.m. on the espresso tv channel. greetings, this is svoboda live on radio svoboda. we have already come to the snake itself. the following shots may shock you. news from the scene. live kamikaze drone attacks. political analytics, objectively and meaningfully. there is no political sesame.

exclusive. interviews, reports from the hottest points of the front. svoboda life is frank and unbiased. you draw your own conclusions. the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians. victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhii rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this. people who have information and shape public opinion. people who defend ukraine and create the future right now. the main and interesting thing in the program. verdict by serhii rudenko, from monday to friday at 20:00, repeat at 12:10. greetings, dear

viewers, the program is on the air of the tv channel zahid studio. we will analyze the most important events of this week, we will talk about security, international affairs, and of course about war. our guests today are matthew bryza and myroslav cech. now on the air. bryza, ex-adviser of the secretary of state of the united states, former director of europe-taurusian affairs at the us national security council will work for the tv channel. glory to ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, i congratulate you. the unexpected resignation of speaker mccartney, which led to a second extremely unpleasant story. in particular , it is about the 45-day budget of the united states without aid for ukraine. the fact that we in ukraine are worried, well, that's an understatement. in fact, the fact that money for ukraine was withdrawn from the bill on temporary financing of the government came as a complete surprise. support for ukraine is quite strong in the united states congress, even

among republicans. and only a small group of the most radical republicans who support trump do not want to support ukraine for reasons i still do not fully understand. it was they who wanted the government. ceased to function, depriving him money, and to avoid that, then- speaker mccarthy had to compromise. he chose a compromise, which was that there would be no aid to ukraine in this budget, but another budget would be passed in 45 days, and of course, everyone except the radical republicans hoped that there would be money for ukraine in it. but now the most important who will replace speaker mccarthy are the two main candidates, steve scalise, a senior republican from the state of louisiana, he advocates for greater support for ukraine, quoting biden, until as long as it takes, and his opponent, jim

jordan of ohio, opposes increased support for ukraine. so the newly elected speaker will decide which bills to vote on and can block aid to ukraine. if he so chooses, there is nothing president biden can do in that case except try to convince him, so this is a completely unexpected turn of events, and to me it is deeply embarrassing to the democratic system of the united states of america, because it shows how close we are to a complete dysfunctionality. we understand that the united states helps us in a way that few people in the world help us, but we want to increase this help, in particular, taking into account the winter campaign on the big front of the russian-ukrainian war, so we hoped that america would dare, that president biden would dare and will sign the relevant documents regarding the allocation

of atakams to us, a few weeks ago, mr. borkovsky, you and i talked about the fact that the biden administration is finally ready to provide atakams to ukraine and is moving well in the direction supply of f-16 because it is finally clear that ukraine really needs these weapons and is not going to use them for attacks on russian territory. without such resources , ukraine will not be able to do what washington expects of it, that is, to make progress on the battlefield. and then everyone was caught off guard by this bezlat in the political system of the united states. therefore, it is currently impossible to say what will happen next. also, i think in the long run. it will be politically disadvantageous for whoever becomes speaker of the house to not renew support of ukraine, but now it is simply impossible to say how quickly it can happen and how big this help can be.

as far as i understand, $5 billion in aid to ukraine still remains unused. based on the fact that, on average, ukraine receives from the united states... per month, we are talking about two months of aid that has not yet been provided. we also saw how many iranian weapons were seized and will be... transferred to ukraine, it is about millions of cartridges and thousands of iranian- made machine guns, which were apparently transported by sea for the houthi rebels. however, ukraine cannot win the war relying on such accidental finds of weapons. the united states must provide funding. dear mr. ambassador, i understand what you are talking about, on the other hand, there is no end to the concern, the so-called signals are multiplying, very often they are

anonymous sources in the white house, very often they are retired generals who start talking, it is not only about the united states, for example, about great britain, and they begin to say what is possible in our warehouses something will end, well, we are talking about the british statement, we will help ukraine, but it should be taken into account that our help is also not rubber and so on, i am reluctantly trying to predict the situation that may develop in a couple of months. yes, when trump supporters may appear in the united states , for example, and they will say, we already helped ukraine enough, and they will name the amount of 100 billion dollars and say, let's reduce the aid, but you have a feeling, this is about real schedules in american and european politicians, in particular, it is about two key stories, money and weapons. the foundation of politics is money and spending, and in the united states it is congress that decides how much money will be appropriated for

the goals the president wants to achieve. this is where the united states congress has the most power, and it is why our democratic system is difficult to govern, sometimes it happens. but as winston churchill said, americans will eventually do right after they have tried everything wrong. now we are in a mode where we have an extreme group. republican supporters of president trump, who are nihilistic. they would like to bring down our government because they think it will make biden look bad and trump look good. so ukraine is a hostage of this process. in the long run, i think aid will be given, based at least on what churchill once said. in the end, the united states will do the right thing. in the short term, the positive is that it is. is also a certain signal for our european allies to make them

do more. great britain has done a lot, it's true, germany has done a lot , estonia has done the most per capita, but there are other countries like bulgaria that haven't done as much as they should have done. i hope that now there will be a small political crisis also inside the european union, so that they understand that they should do even more to help ukraine, dear mr. ambassador, in any case, we understand that now international politics is experiencing, maybe not the best times for ukraine, we feel that certain changes are taking place, i won't say that these changes are tectonic, but in any case, in addition to hungarian prime minister orban, we also got slovakian prime minister robert fitz, rather era and so on, we understand that ukrainian-polish relations have deteriorated, rapidly deteriorated, we want to believe that they will... improve, well, in the near future,

yes, thanks to certain specific efforts of ukrainian and polish politicians, but in any case there is a feeling that perhaps the world situation may worsen for us, it's true, every political issue, every political problem, every war in my life has at some point lost the interest of the international community, but the international interest in this war was and remains it is still very strong, but political systems do not stand still, remember , what was the support of ukraine in slovakia at the beginning of the war, how many ukrainian refugees did they accept, the same was the case with poland, of course, but then domestic politics intervened, the economic conditions in both countries became more difficult and difficult for farmers, in particular due to ukrainian grain. i can't say that their support dissipated. no, it exists, and i think that in

slovakia and poland, everyone still realizes that it is very important that ukraine wins. however , people have become more withdrawn, more selfish, more focused on their own situation and less sympathetic to ukraine. but it is absolutely clear that slovakia and poland know that ukraine must win this war. people are a little tired these days, a little. forgot all the seriousness of this war, on the field battle, a kind of stalemate was formed, but with the passage of time, when the polish elections come , when the slovak political system calms down, after the re-election of fico, who has long been a supporter of putin, then i think that support for ukraine will be restored. but it's easy for me to talk sitting here. if i were ukrainian, i would be very worried. at the end of the day i am also concerned. it is terrible how poland and

yaroslav kaczynski behave towards ukraine. to impose additional economic difficulties on ukraine due to polish interests farmers in elections, it is at least selfish, and at most it is strategic suicide. in istanbul, perhaps another meeting of the so-called istanbul format is being prepared, which may be the agenda of this meeting, what will be discussed, because the issue of the so-called peace formula, it can be interpreted quite differently in different states, in different political structures. we have a ukrainian position, it was expressed by our president volodymyr zelenskyi, but we understand that different cabinets may want to see their own solutions issue of war great question, and i fully agree that different countries in the transatlantic family have different visions of how the war should end, or how it

should continue. so, president erdoğan has been consistent on some issues, and i assume he will play the lead. role in agenda setting. from the very beginning, he clearly condemned russia's invasion of ukraine, supported the territorial integrity of ukraine, condemning the annexation of crimea and other four regions, as well as the occupation of donbas. he was consistent in providing turkey provides significant military aid to ukraine. at the same time, he managed to be consistent in his desire to remain a potential mediator and maintain his contacts with putin. erdogan is really proud of the grain agreement, because he was not the last to conclude it. i think the agenda will be to restore the grain agreement, while ukraine appears to be complying with it by shipping its grain and other cargoes along the coasts of romania and bulgaria, which are

nato members. so erdogan will try to restore grain agreement also his consistency is that he just wants the war to end and peace to come. he sees turkey's role in international relations as a stabilizing force and a country that is committed to finding peace, even regardless of how unjust the political situation may be on the ground, in this case ukraine, as a human being, he just wants to stop killing people. the biden administration takes a different position, on the one hand they believe that ukraine should decide how to end the war on its own, and on the other hand, because i... or they were afraid of escalation by russia and the use of nuclear weapons, which i think is a mistake. the european union expressed itself very clearly: ukraine must receive all the necessary support and must decide for itself how to end the war. here are the issues that will be on the agenda of this meeting. how can we achieve

peace, how can we be mediators, how can we achieve respect for the territorial integrity of ukraine, and how can we ensure that the export of grain is included. dear mr. ambassador, a couple of weeks have passed since the visit of president zelensky and of the ukrainian delegation to washington, there were a lot of emotions, there were very loud statements, we in ukraine tried to analyze all this, but there were also meetings, in particular , a meeting with one of the patriarchs of american diplomacy , kissinger, so he met with representatives of our ukrainian delegation and accordingly, we understand that american... diplomacy, well, it is declaratively extremely eloquent and extremely powerful, but there are very different currents, and if we speak in what way they will now try to want to unfold ukrainian-american cooperation, i 'm going back to the beginning of our conversation again, because help is best manifested, in particular, in

the allocation of heavy weapons, so the russians would like to turn the russian-ukrainian war into a land war. in an infantry war, our key task is to get heavy artillery, missile systems, heavy tanks, not 30 abrams, but 130 or 230, yes, but that means that the russians can use some or the other unconventional threats that they are hinting at. let's start with former secretary of state kissinger. he considered the most experienced and one of the wisest diplomats in the history of the united states.in interacting with him during my diplomatic career, i found his views to be profound, but i did not always agree with them. so i can assume that maybe the ukrainian delegation that met with him did not completely

agree either. we remember how kissinger suggested at the beginning of the war that perhaps it would be better for ukraine to look for a way to peace, as erdogan is doing, and not to continue the war. and then he changed his point of view: deep the wisdom of henry kissinger, which reflects the need for ukraine to end this war. on her terms, is what will ultimately prevail in washington. currently, we are witnessing real political madness in washington, due to which the supply of arms to ukraine has been politicized, perhaps, thus deterring the potential use of unconventional or nuclear weapons by russia. that is, it is not even a rational debate, it is simply pointless. the fight between supporters and opponents of trump in the republican party, which hopefully will soon end. and

the biden administration will receive increased funding for ukraine, including most systems such as atakams. in this way, ukraine will once again be able to control its destiny as much as possible. and one more point, i think henry kissinger, like a lot of people. washington does not fully understand how ukraine can dislodge all russian troops from crimea and donbas. because this is a very difficult task. but in my circle of friends in washington, there are military and political experts who see that ukraine is moving in this direction, firstly, thanks to its gradual advancing towards the sea of ​​azov to separate donbas and crimea. and secondly, with the help of atakams, other longer-range missile systems, as well as ukrainian naval drones, which pose a serious

threat to the crimean bridge. so it's entirely possible that ukraine will soon be able to cut off crimea without killing all of the russian military, and that will force putin to negotiate terms that will ultimately be much more favorable to ukraine. dear. you know, i'm afraid of the so-called repetition of the afghan syndrome, yes, in particular it is said about the american election campaign, and, for example, the presidential candidate donald trump, or someone else from his political circle will start shedding lying crocodiles or tears, saying, you know, we helped ukraine very well, but now we have to focus on the problems of farmers from pennsylvania , the american election campaign can bring a lot of unexpected, unpleasant surprises, and the tough task of our ukrainian politicians is to be ready and act in advance, we received

a number of advice and deadlines from the american authorities regarding the implementation of certain reforms, well, here is the key task , i would ask you to analyze these reforms that we have to carry out quickly, there is a specified time, there is three months, six months, and so on, and so on, that is, if we let's not get into the timing of whether it would have any effect on the... the provision of full and irreversible aid from the united states, and in general, i'd like you to also mention the lendlease situation, the republicans who are opposed to supporting they are looking for ukraine any excuse to justify their position because they think it will make them more attractive in the eyes of donald trump, so for their own benefit they will point to corruption in ukraine. on any insufficient means, on the wrong forms of ownership, that is, they will put pressure on vulnerable places. as for the current progress of the

zelensky government in carrying out reforms, i cannot give any assessment. after all, i don't think anyone is watching it as closely as before the war, because of course we're all focused in the war, but if you look at how he is trying to weed out corruption from the ministry of defense, for example, in matters of procurement and others, the impression is otherwise positive. in the end, not so much the situation with internal reforms in ukraine will determine whether the united states will continue to help. in fact, in the first place, everything depends on who will be elected speaker of the house of representatives of the united states congress. so who will win the presidential election in 2024, and if it is trump, then we already heard, he will figure out how to stop the war in 24 hours. frankly, i don't think so. that he will stop helping ukraine. he realized when he was the current president that the united states should have provided ukraine with the javelina

so that it could defend itself, and thank god. that it happened trump does not understand geopolitics very well, and everything he does is transactional, that is, he wants to know his benefit from this or that step. i think that president zelensky will find out in which way ukraine will be able to reach those to whom necessary. the speaker of the house, whoever it is, ultimately has to listen to the president of the united states, because even when the united states gravitated toward isolationism. even when our first president , george washington, advised americans to avoid what he called foreign ties, the united states always had an inherent idealistic motivation, which was the idea that the united states would make the world safe for democracy. i think these trends will persist in american politics and will to persist as long as you and your

viewers watch the politics of the united states. concerning. league, it is impossible to pedal this issue now, because the house of representatives cannot meet and do official business , since it does not have a speaker, only when a new speaker is elected, the house of representatives will return to work and the speaker will control what proposals or bills can be put to a vote, so if the speaker is that gentleman i mentioned, jim jordan, i think he simply will never bring such a bill to the floor. and biden will have no legislative way to do anything. on the other hand, if steve scalise, of louisiana, is elected speaker. i'm sure he 'll want bills like the lendless proposal to come up for a vote in congress. therefore, if such a vote were to take place, i have no doubt that the bill would pass and become law, but it is impossible to predict the future at this time because the legislative

schedule or agenda is entirely dependent on from who will be elected the next speaker of the house of representatives. thank you very much, dear mr. ambassador, for this extremely interesting and honest conversation on the air of the tv channel. and i would like to remind our tv viewers that matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of europe-taurasia affairs at the us national security council, was currently working for them. glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes. people and ideas that protect and create ukraine. the sixth forumpathy - the future of tradition, ukrainian in the global world, ivano-frankivsk, october 14 and 15. discussions about the challenges of the times and the projection of the future, meetings with warrior writers in the center of events

, the performance of the nation by the frankiv drama theater: the annual meeting place of strong, honest unique people, traditionally in the carpathians, see eter espresso, come to the events of the forum in ivano-frankivsk with the support of the ukrainian cultural fund under the protection of our military stress, there are discounts on tablets glycyset and glycyset max, 15% in podorozhnyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. there are discounts on perfect deal original, 15% in pharmacies, plantain, bam and savings. the most important events events, events that are happening right now and affect our lives. of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, you need to understand it. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly

evaluate events, analyze them, modeling them for the near future, every saturday at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10:00 p.m.: west studio with anton borkovskii at espresso. there is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. russia is throwing millions of petrodollars into turning ukrainians into little russians. ukraine. analysis and analysis of information about ukraine russian propagandists, specifically. facts and methods by which enemy propaganda turns people into obedient zombies. for the historical reunion. countering russian information attacks in the information war chronicle project with olga len. tuesday, thursday-friday at 17:10 on