filing a lawsuit without taking into account the interests of the shareholders and without their involvement demonstrates that the judge will consider the case without their participation. the shareholders are convinced that all this is done in order to further embezzle the company, accumulate its debts and remove the shareholders and the legally elected bodies of the company from managing its activities, prevent the shareholders from putting things in order and bring the culprits to justice. due to such court decisions, no joint-stock company in ukraine... can feel safe, and the rights of shareholders can be protected. we will remind trials regarding atbc have been ongoing since 2021, and this is not the first questionable decision of judge gorbasenko in this case. previously, the public integrity council and journalists drew attention to the judge's property, which cannot be explained by official income, as well as his possible fictitious divorce with the alleged purpose of hiding wealth. nabu tap together with the sbu exposed the judge.

volodymyr serdynskyi of the prover city district court for bribes of usd 400. according to the investigation, the judge received a bribe from a representative of one of the parties in civilian clothes case, for making a decision in its interests. part of the illegal benefit in the amount of 1. he received it earlier, when the decision was made to suppress the evidence in the case. when receiving the second part of the funds in the amount of $3,000 for the foreclosure decision. debt, in favor of the plaintiff, serdynskyi was hotly exposed by nabu detectives. the sbu added that during the search of the suspected judge, 15,600 dollars packed in different envelopes were seized. the president delays the appointment of a member of the vrp according to his quota. back in april, the competition commission from of the selection of candidates for the position of a member of the vrp, sent volodymyr zelenskyi a list of recommended candidates for the vacant position.

however, it is already october, and there are still no appointments. then, as a few days ago, on october 3 , the mandate of another member of the vrp, under the president's quota, oksana blazhivska, expired. new candidates for appointment will also be recommended for her position. a somewhat similar situation existed earlier. in 2020, when the previous supreme council of justice was being formed, the president had to appoint two members of the supreme judicial council according to his quota. president then announced a competition for two vacant positions , a number of winners were selected, the president appointed only one member of the supreme council of justice, announced a new competition, a new commission, and another person was already appointed to the new vacancy. tetyana rozvalyaeva is known for actually keeping the kharkiv agreements in force, that is, the agreements on the extension of the black sea fleet's presence in crimea until the 1940s, which were signed in kharkiv at the time.

yanukovych and representatives of the aggressor state. experts of the deyura foundation insist, while the supreme council of justice is overloaded thousands of complaints, and the eu is waiting for us to launch the vrp with a new composition, such a delay is unacceptable. already this month, the european commission will provide a new assessment of ukraine's implementation of european integration recommendations. what characteristic will we get from taking into account. that judicial reform is a key requirement on the way to ukraine's accession to the eu, and it is progressing slowly. the council of judges elected volodymyr kuzmenko , a person from the entourage of the odious and scandalous chairman of the liquidated oask, pavlo vovka, to the competition commission that will appoint judges of the constitutional court, and also the henchman of fugitive president viktor yanukovych, yaroslav romaniuk, former head of the supreme court. in 2017, as a candidate for the position. a judge of the constitutional

court, romanyuk received a negative opinion from the public council of integrity, in particular because he supported the criminal dictatorial laws of january 16 during the revolution of dignity. during the euromaidan events, romanyuk was very concerned about the protection of judges, but not so much about the mass arbitrary decisions they made regarding protest participants. he is in no way about them did not express during the meeting of the council of judges, romaniuk said that this was a mistake, while he believed that the courts were outside of politics. in his speech before the council of judges, romanyuk also criticized the judicial reform. according to the analysis of public organizations, these are the worst candidates ever. he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council at the competition for the supreme court of the new, so-called, and then withdrew from the competition as a result. this did not prevent him from being elected to this position by the still current council of judges. romanyuk's deputy is the council of judges.

chose an equally odious candidate, volodymyr kuzmenko, who appears on vovka's tapes. at the meeting, he stated that he could not comment on events that he was not a part of. also, kuzmenko did not admit that his voice was on the tapes. volodymyr kuzmenko is directly a wolf man, as can be seen from their films and not only from these films. this all shows how rotten and inadequate the council of courts is today with its leadership, which was also put there by pavlo vovk, by the way, this is what i am investigating investigative journalists, it is necessary to very actively follow what these delegates will do, for the apology in the dorach. experts on the selection of judges of the constitutional court, but it is also necessary to review very carefully what the council of judges does, its composition and, in general, whether it is needed or not in the current judicial system of ukraine. interestingly, the council of judges did not rate candidate mykola gimon, a patriot who made pro-ukrainian

decisions in donetsk in 2014. members of the council of judges gave gimon zero votes. experts foundations warn that if the ukrainian composition of the advisory group of experts consists of odious representatives with a dubious reputation, and not real agents of the media, we will have every chance to fail the judicial reform, which is unacceptable on ukraine's path to the european union. for today, i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system of ukraine, or you want to tell about dishonesty. judge, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address that you now see on your screens, let's meet in a week, to all the best, people and ideas that

protect and create ukraine, the sixth forumpathy, the future of tradition. ukrainian in the global world ivano-frankivsk on october 14 and 15, discussions about the challenges of time and the projection of the future meeting with warrior writers in the center of events, the performance of the nation by the frankiv drama theater, the annual meeting place of strong, honest and unique people , traditionally in prykarpattia, see vyteri espressodte at the events of the forum in ivano -frankivsk with the support of the ukrainian cultural fund under the protection of ours military meridoza is taken, sprayed into the nose, already after washing, forward to the treatment, maridos - of course the first installment, buy on the podorojne.com website, there are discounts on oracept spray, 20% in pharmacies, plantain, bam

and savings. what is it vasyu, i drank an antibiotic, i used an antibiotic, i drank probiz, gavrilo, you are also sick, i am sick, i drank an antibiotic, i drank probiz in your stomach. tired of heavy and bulky saws, then the compact and powerful saw strong unpack tv is just for you. now you can cut trees and bushes with ease. pollen strongg is so convenient to use for carpentry. it is the perfect tool for your home or garden. and the price is only uah 1,499. a reliable battery is also included. cut branches, cut timber, chop firewood. you will do all this in one movement with the strongg saw. and look how quickly she copes, even with thick branches. the strong saw is easy to use and portable, once you're done. and unlike standard saws, it is so convenient to use in hard-to-reach places. the set includes a powerful battery, a key and a screwdriver, as well as a charger, which

will allow you to always have a charged saw at hand. call and order a reliable and convenient tool for only uah 1,499. powerful saw strong - what you need, call. tired of heavy and bulky saws, then the compact and powerful strong saw from unpack tv is just for you. now you can easily trim trees and bushes. the strongg saw is so convenient to use for carpentry. it is the perfect tool for your home or garden. and the price is only uah 1,499. also reliable battery included. cut branches, cut timber, chop firewood. you will do all this in one movement with the strong saw. and see how quickly she copes, even with thick branches. the strong fork is easy to use and mobile, once you're done. and unlike standard saws, it is so convenient to use in hard-to -reach places. the set includes a powerful battery, a key and a screwdriver, as well as a charger that will allow you to always have

a charged saw at hand. call and order a reliable and convenient tool only for 1499 hryvnias. powerful saw strong - what you need, call. hello, my name is andrii. and today we will talk with andrii kurkov, a writer. mr. andriy, good day to you, i congratulate you. actually, mr. andrii said to introduce him as a writer, and this, you know, modesty, it is not the greatest virtue in the modern world, but i think it is still worth adding that mr. andrii, probably one of the most famous ukrainian writers, in particular abroad, and well, there is this, there is that, good. yes, well, this, this, this is a fact, and probably, actually,

that's why mr. andrii's voice is heard very often, as well as abroad, and this is exactly the topic i wanted to focus on today, er , this topic is not simple, it is the topic of how we work with russian softpower, m "what a force that is , which acts simultaneously both in the whole world and in ukraine itself, i would like to analyze this story a little, in particular that story, which recently had such a resonance, had such a definite even scandalous, let's say , echo, in which, in which mr. andrii kurkov also participated, this topic seems to me nevertheless, it is important, it really needs to be discussed, as for me , mr. andriy, are you comfortable talking about it, i am comfortable, i am comfortable talking about everything, i would start with the fact that whether we are now, in principle, reaching such an understanding

, that we must speak on any platforms, on any topics, including talking about russians, including talking about ukraine, even where russians are also present, what is your own position, i will remind just a very brief background, this is the story when you agreed to meet at one playground with masha hesen. she's already an american citizen, as far as i know, but uh, a russian journalist who, you know, masha hesen, an american citizen since 1981, oh, this, this, this, to be honest, it seemed like five years to me, but she was already an american citizen, well, it was for him, although, for her, no, i so know that she is not a binary personality, not so long ago, so here you also need not to get confused with, with

the correct representation, i know that your colleagues have been quite, some, your colleagues have reacted quite harshly to your decision, and i have i know that you have already explained why you did not refuse this meeting, this conversation on the same platform, can you tell me why? well, you know, the situation that happened in may of this year, in new york, it was really unpleasant and unacceptable for the ukrainian participants, i will remind you a little about what it is about, that is, two ukrainian servicemen, artem cheh and artem chapai, as well as our writers , came to speak at the new york festival organized by peno, american, they knew and agreed that masha gesyn would be the moderator, but

they did not know that the organizers, uh, decided to invite two more russian political migrants, one historian and one journalist, to this panel, and when they found out, the ukrainian participants, military personnel, said that they were not allowed by the ministry prohibitions to speak with russians, and not military personnel said that if they speak on a panel with russians, they will not be allowed back to ukraine, ugh, and thus the organizers took the meeting with russians outside the festival, it took place in a smaller format and with a different audience, the ukrainian participants performed by themselves, without the russians, well, masha hesen reacted emotionally and not very correctly, that is... she resigned from the post of vice president of the american pen club, the pen center, and in the comments somewhere

they said , that ukrainian writers are very cruel to her russians, to the possibility of speaking with russians, and in principle, after that, she was banned from ukraine , my ukrainian colleagues, and that is why there was a reaction to the fact that i agreed to speak with her, especially that she was criticized constantly, that she in his interviews, he says everywhere that this is putin's war, not the russians' war, huh. well, in principle, the choice was as follows: either they will talk about ukraine, without ukrainians, and in this case without my participation, or i will participate and, if i disagree, i will talk about it, and indeed, during the meeting, she repeated

this thesis that this is putin's war, i explained and argued why it is a war of russia and the people, and not of putin, she publicly agreed, in the end, that i was right, and that is, the transcript of this, this conversation is ukrainian language on the internet, a journalist from the babel publication was present at the meeting, she recorded everything, then took a short interview with me, and after that i got what i got, and that's exactly what was canceled at the lviv forum, my recorded video dialogue with jonathan frandson, who was supposed to open the lviv forum, that is, you are not present at the lviv forum precisely because of this, i am not there, yes, do you think that this is unfair? i don't think anything, i think that now,

to give an assessment because it is happening, there is no sense, but there is, that is, it was a demand of the community, which was... satisfied, and in principle, if the community is satisfied with this result, then everything is fine. let's talk about this position again, your opinion is that if we don't sit down in the same space with the russians and talk, including about us and about them, then in fact we are simply giving them this playground. i am not saying that you should talk with russians, with all russians and so on, that is, for america, masha gesyn is not russian, that is, no one perceives her as russian. but i believe that there are cases, especially when this one the audience is very important for ukraine, and the meeting took place in toronto, and the audience was very serious, including representatives, one might say, of the top leadership, of the country, so i believe that at such meetings, the voice of ukraine should be heard, that is,

such scenes you can't give it away, russian. or to people who are connected with russia, from your own feelings, is the attitude towards ukraine and russia changing in principle, well, we understand that russia is on these platforms, relatively speaking, on university platforms, in the faculties of slavic studies, which are actually were rather, by the faculties of russian studies all this time, it is always present, it has been present for decades, and it builds its narratives, imperial, non-imperial , hylist, whatever, but it remains there, and what should we do to change it, or we can try to cancel russian culture both abroad and in russia, is this not a naive attempt? you know, our attempts to censor the entire russian culture are exposed to

the misunderstanding of almost the entire western intellectual community. those who speak now on platforms about ukraine in the west, those who are allowed on these platforms are not representatives of russia, but they perfectly understand the ukrainian position, and they look there, in fact, as victims of ukrainian hate, and by this they actually cause sympathy and er, some such emotions are not at all the kind that ukrainians would like in this situation, regarding universities , well, russian studios have lost their popularity and now, well, not now, already in the last five years the number of students who want to learn the russian language,

literature there or something else, uh, uh, in universities, the departments of russian studies are renamed simply to the departments of... or east european languages ​​and cultures there, this process is ongoing and will continue, but the more often we will loudly slam the door, uh, in situations where it is necessary to choose whether to speak or not to speak at the same platform, whether to participate or not to participate in one festival or one conference, the more the image of a victim will be in fact, for those with whom ukrainians did not want to talk, and it will already be about an internal relationship between russia and ukraine, a not that we report any of our own. theses and thoughts about the war, about russian culture, about the role of russian culture in this war.

there are actually different platforms where representatives of ukraine and russia can interact abroad, the simplest example is , of course, athletes, that is, when our athletes and russian athletes, but who perform under a neutral flag, the so-called, can meet at one. .. and compete for the same awards, and we had a different position than that we boycott any competitions where the russians are present, to the point that we participate where the russians are, but they are at least under a neutral flag, or can this be extrapolated to other areas, to cultural, to cultural events and for cultural figures, you know, before or later. we will have to choose some russians with whom we can talk, because in fact, ukrainians began to be invited less and less

to both literary events and conferences, and here, one of the largest literary festivals, the berlin international festival, did not invite a single one in september, ukrainian author, but invited three representatives of the russian opposition. participate in discussions, this situation will repeat itself, i think we will witness that we will be less willing to be heard, because in reality we, we speak the truth, but we speak the same truth, without without evolution, without development thoughts, that is, we simply cancel and say that there are no good russians, we show our wounds, we want sympathy and help. yes, there is sympathy, help will decrease, i already know from my own experience, two examples when, at ukrainian

events, the organizers asked not to announce the collection of aid for ukraine, for humanitarian purposes, that is, we have tired everyone a little, so to speak , with this monotonous position of ours, this is in principle, this is cumulative. reaction, because it is a collective reaction both to and to the fact that we slam the door, and to the fact that we, demand and ask, and to the fact that we, in fact, er, sometimes impose, er, our own opinions, er, to a foreign audience that it does not accept because of its own values, its own understanding of democracy, and so on then, well, we hear ourselves, truly affected in this story, we hear: those on whose side of justice we demand this, do we have the right to demand this?

we have the right to demand in principle any justice, but we are reminded that we did not stand on the side of other countries when other countries were attacked, and when other countries demanded justice and asked for help, and this is not only about rwanda, this about many other situations, because we are, in principle, normal selfish people who were always focused on on our own life, on our own problems, on our own thoughts about our own future in our country, we are now, we are living now, sorry to interrupt, we are now living in such a situation where we have enough effort, at least to build a unified narrative within the country , and it is obvious that we, here you said this phrase, and that the participants in this discussion in may, those who were not military said that they simply will not be allowed back to ukraine, this actually, it surprised

people very much , who are, and the organizers, those who are heard, i will not name names, and it was a little unpleasant for our diplomats , because we are not north korea, nevertheless, we also have reverse stories, when a lot of cultural figures or... politicians do not have the opportunity to leave for border on being invited even to some international events , this is an internal political problem , this is the continuation of the political struggle inside the country during the war, this is, in principle, a separate topic, which is also very unpleasant and which you do not really want to touch abroad, well but the question is also that there is a desire to establish some unified narrative, some unified narrative, for everyone, including writing. somewhere they acted very unanimously, synchronously and unanimously, there is some kind of practical or ethical moment here, it is that

your colleagues, maybe from the pen center, they... for example, decided, i understand, there was some kind of decision that we boycott mashu hesen , is this not, in fact, this is a conditionally general decision, i think, of most ukrainian intellectuals and writers, which is not written down, and which, people who adhere to of this decision, they demand that everyone obey this decision, in principle, i don't want to talk again now about collectivism, which is manifested in this and about something else, that is, there is a difference between collectivism and solidarity, uh, solidarity is not, 100% obligatory mandatory, and solidarity requires, in principle, an analytical approach to each individual case, when questions arise whether to do it or

not to do it, and of course in such a situation, in a war situation, any situation that goes beyond the limits of what what everyone thinks is the right behavior, it causes conflict, so it was with bulork andruhovich when he met with mykhailo shishkin, so it was with oksana zabushka, when she allowed a russian translation of her work to be published in england, so it happened to me, so it will happen to others, that is, in principle, this is not a unique situation, you you know, when you talk to people who reacted very painfully, for example, to the story with you and hesse, or to the story with that swiss citizen of russian origin and writer and andruhovich, you remember this meeting too, and - i very often hear arguments, that said, although we understand that most people

in this country know little about andruhovich, and i certainly don't even... i can now remember this swiss writer of russian origin from memory, and this means that in principle, so to speak , shishken shishken, that’s right, therefore, the influence actually on some large masses is insignificant, but there is always an argument that , conditionally speaking, it is possible to meet with hesse, also the influence of hesse on russia, i also think, well, absolutely minimal people from non-binary a person who has been a citizen since 1981 united i do not think that she is a very influential person there, for she is hated there, in fact, much more than she is hated in ukraine, in fact, and, but the argument is that if you can, for example, talk to gesem in a curt fashion, then why can't potap , well, some conditional potap there, he can’t record some collab, but with some one there, i don’t know what the names of those russian rappers are all there, well , someone with some russian rapper there, now during the war, why not, after all , in

such a case... and this is also a question of where it leads us, it leads us to what we are just now, only we are happy that we have russian musical compositions there, for example, on youtube somewhere below the 10th place, maybe, and we understand that we just need some kind of repulsion for the masses, repulsion from the russian softpower here in ukraine , and it seems to me that all the time such a ricochet or echo of these stories about the fact that somewhere there are high-ranking intellectuals... ukrainian somewhere there sit down at the same table with russian intellectuals, good russians of various degrees, this is always a story also about the fact that we we are afraid, no matter how much it is our common people, you know, no no no back did not return to russian culture and russian influences. i think all reasonable people understand that there will be no return to relations with russia, whether cultural or otherwise, and

there will be no communication between russians and ukrainians. two generations after the war and just as it happened between the soviet people and the germans, although the germans changed under the influence of the american occupation and re-education. no one will occupy and reeducate russians, they can only change themselves, and in my opinion, the only way, and the only possibility for them to change is if china becomes democratized, and they are now determined to watch and copy everything that china does, then they may also democratize behind china, but when it will happen, no one knows, ugh, and to be afraid of that that some new russian-ukrainian relations will appear, which will be expanded, intensified and used by russia, this is it, it is in principle...