[000:00:00;00] which they repeatedly tried to do, it will accuse ukraine not only of all the detonations, for example, the zaporizhia nuclear power plant, but the detonations in front of the kursk nuclear plant, belarus under the detonations, as if we are going on sabotage, detonating nuclear facilities on the territory of russia and belarus and they will create us nuclear terrorists, it was also revealed , this operation also failed, although it was planned to carry out partial detonations, to blame ukraine, everything is already known and the whole world knows what russia is doing. how she uses nuclear blackmail, it is clear that this format is no longer does not take place anywhere, he does not speak there, neither the statements of putin, medvedev, no longer work. thank you, mr. general, it was general of the army of ukraine, former head of the foreign intelligence service of ukraine, mykola malomush. friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us on youtube, please like this video and also participate in our vote. today we ask you about

this. who will check the biggest options for answers to the president, the armed forces of ukraine, the church, volunteers, or, if you have your own version, please write in the comments below this video. next, we have oleksandr khara, an expert on foreign and security policy at the center for defense strategies. mr. oleksandr, i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our air. good evening, mr. serhiy, it is mutual, today, anthony blinken, secretary of state of the united states of america flew to israel to show support for ukraine, with the situation in which israel got into in connection with the attacks of hamas, let's listen to what blinken said today to the prime minister of israel, benjamin netanyahu. the message i bring to israel today is, you can be strong enough to

stand up for yourself. but as long as america exists, you will never, ever have to, we will always be there for you. mr. alexander, this statement by blinken is obviously directed at iran, at syria, at other countries of the arab world, and not only this statement, but also the aircraft carrier group, gerald ford, headed by gerald ford. where she arrived to the shores of israel, is washington's voice convincing enough now in the middle east war, you know, i think this is blinken's public message, it wasn't a public message, because if we're talking about the return of the united states to the middle east, because the countries of the region understand that without the united states, it is impossible to solve the problems, no one is going back either to

china or to the russians. federation, we see a crisis that could turn into a regional conflict with far-reaching consequences, but no pekin and moscow are not involved here, they, if pekin is sitting on the fence, then moscow is trying to justify terrorism and is trying to play some kind of pseudo-diplomacy, and the propaganda channels were aimed at discrediting, first of all, israel, but also ukraine with these trophy weapons that were transferred. means terrorists and most likely, this is one of the main factors that we can use to say that the russian federation is involved, if not in the planning of this large-scale attack, then at least in order to use the weapons and the desire to discredit ukraine, let's say, by hurting the state of israel and the israelis, here, but the hidden message,

it seems to me, is that... mr. netanyahu did not, let's say, overstep certain limits, because of course, he actually has now is carte blanche, because in order to change the balance of power not only within the state itself, but also in the region, it is very important here what the reaction will be, to what extent , let's say, this cleaning, will it cause a negative reaction from the countries of the region, which are currently being observed, and how much... iran will have any desire, whether directly, most likely through proxy groups such as hezbollah, to be involved in such a conflict, i think that this will not happen, but it certainly depends on how they will, this purge will take place

, what will be the ground campaign, how will it affect the civilians, the palestinians, and will it not distract those arabs who are now watching, of course, silently supporting the palestinians, but cannot openly say it, because of course such a brutal attack is not can be justified and nothing, on the main, let's say, security guarantees, the main, signals of support, israel, almost not only, the aircraft carrier group of gerald fort, as well as eisenhower, since it is the second group of troops, which, as the american military says and, therefore , official factors, she was scheduled for her rotation in the mediterranean, and in fact, she is now heading there, that is. then this is a clear indicator that neither iran nor its proxy groups or groups, either from syria or from libya, should not get in there, and by the way, this is

a very interesting thing, on the one hand, we can to see a new balance of power in the region, on the other hand, the government , or this one, or if he holds on, well, i mean, if netanyahu holds on, and there is a possibility that after such a failure of intelligence and the military, and let's say this, he can be ousted from power, and of course what he's trying to do now with the force , this anger that he's showing, the force of retribution for the atrocities and the killings and actually the effect of 9/11, he's going to try to compensate for that, but it's clear that he's in a precarious position and actually his doctrine of neglect means by the palestinians and in fact the politics of the orthodoxy of internal life, which has caused a constitutional crisis, although israel does not have a constitution, but in fact it has one, all these factors may play a role in the fact that we after some time after the end of this

acute phase of course, we will see that he he will be squeezed out of politics, and it is very important, besides all this, how the russians are trying to, let's say, use... the conflict to discredit ukraine, not only with weapons, and these propaganda clichés have already been picked up by the trumpians , they they accuse biden of the fact that, well, first of all, weapons were transferred to ukraine, secondly, that biden allegedly transferred to ukraine certain means that were previously deployed in the region in the event of a crisis, in fact, they say that there is such a crisis. actually no , these facilities are intended to respond to a possible regional conflict, and that's the first point, and the second point, in fact, you remember it very well, how the americans agreed with the south koreans when they transferred the same

munitions, including from composition provided for israel, they were handing over to ukraine, instead they were filling it with south korean munitions, meaning i don't believe that the american military, especially one like mr. miley, who retired, that he could jeopardize his own interests of the united states, as well as a key an ally of the united states in the region, so of course what is happening there now in the gas sector and in israel as a whole depends , let's say, on the level of support that can be provided by us, i liked the idea of the biden administration , which is currently being worked on, about the possible packaging... of aid to ukraine, israel, and possibly taiwan, into one, one resolution, which will have to be dug up by the trumpians, who wanted

to deprive ukraine of such aid as soon as possible. mr. oleksandr, 50, or rather, 67 years ago, in 1956, when there was a swedish crisis, western countries and france, in particular great britain, started hostilities in egypt, and at the time when it was unfolding, nikita khrushchev took advantage of this history and introduced troops to budapest, and actually, we know how did it all end, uh, or not , should we draw any parallels, that russia, at a time when the whole world will be focused on a war in the near... east, will do something that will go beyond what it can do the russian federation and beyond what the russian federation will be allowed to do? no, you know, of course, that the potential of the russian federation of the soviet union is incomparable,

especially if we are talking about the 50s and 60s, when the americans were afraid of the superiority of the soviet union in space, did not know and were, you do you remember that only after, let's say, the handing in of one of the officers, it was found out that pinkovskii, pinkovskii, it seems, it was an exaggeration, in fact, of the number, of nuclear... ammunition and ballistic missiles and that the soviet economy and even the admirers of the military industry cannot help increasing this number, the russian federation is in much worse conditions than then, this is the first moment, the second moment, if we are talking about ukraine, then they are stuck here, they cannot do anything more than trying to individual, let's say, areas, to advance something, they can certainly work below the line.

of a direct invasion, a direct conflict, and most likely they are, let's say, behind the terrorist attack that took place in the baltic between estonia and finland, the gas pipeline and therefore the relevant communications were damaged, they may try to destabilize the situation in africa in order to put pressure more so on the europeans , who have interests there, but most importantly, of course, with these waves of refugees, that is, they can do shit. here, but something serious is unlikely, and so they try to play this diplomacy, most likely the maximum bonus they get will be a little more oil revenue, it is clear that when there are some, such conflicts in the middle east, and the economy is global, it still depends, to a large extent, on oil, this green transition has not yet taken place, of course this will affect prices, although on the other hand, such a player would not be very interested in the background of a rather slow

exit from the crisis and the confrontation that is happening with the united states, we are waiting for a meeting with sidneypinny in november, if he goes to the united states with biden and maybe they will normalize these relations, which have cooled down now and they, let's say this, of course, they are additional instability and additional a factor that affects all of us , so i don't think that russia can do... something so fundamentally mischievous, but small things, of course, that's in their style, in the kegibi style, and actually, given the resources that they have they own mr. oleksandr, general budanov suggests that these regional or local wars may become part of a large global war, what do you think will happen in the event

of such a war, if this war happens. what is the world waiting for, the redistribution of spheres of influence, the creation of a multipolar one, as he always says and repeats, this is putin of a multipolar world , will there still be two poles, a conditional civilization and a conditional group of countries that we classify as a group of autocratic countries, well, you know, that is the question for a million dollars, as they say, and for by and large, two schools of thought can be distinguished, opinions on the theory of international politics, international relations, the first says that polarization will indeed take place and there will be two main poles, the united states will remain, so it has reduced its power, it cannot have an unhindered influence on the whole world and set certain rules, and we see that the decline of the united states is happening, but it is as fast and powerful as beijing, tehran and moscow would like it to be. well , of course. that there is growth in china and it shows

his power, behaves more aggressively, and of course the plans he hatches are quite dangerous for the world, because the third world war may start around taiwan. the second school, which i am a supporter of, actually says that the united states will reduce its ability to influence the whole world, it will concentrate on key regions for itself, instead , china will be ... unable to play the role of this superpower, because that's all still a developing country, because after all, it is a country that is extremely dependent on technological and on other, other plans, from more developed countries, primarily the united states, and now coalition alliances are being created to restrain the development of the defense industry and, accordingly, offensive potential, as well as high technologies, which are needed in order to earn the same big money that is needed for both defense and diplomacy and the expansion

of china's influence in the world, so most likely we will see in the next 5-10, maybe 15 years, a re-fragmentation of our international system, when there will be middle powers that will evolve into an important role in certain regions, and the united states itself, it will have greater opportunities , that is, there will be priority regions somewhere in them, for example, the same middle east, obama announced the exit from the middle east, because he announced the turn to asia in 2009, and because he thought that then, first of all, the united states , thanks to this revolution, also... gas, that you are independent, the united states is independent from the middle east, and actually everything is more or less normal there, of course these conflicts, they are not resolved, but they certainly did not deter so much, and china, its growing mission called for more and more, let's say , caution and desire to counter it, and

the actual withdrawal of the united states caused the collapse that we see now, primarily in syria, and the war. .. federations to the middle east and then to africa, now the united states is coming back, and they will play a role there and try to be brokers, balance balance the interests of their former allies or those allies that may return, like saudi arabia, by the way quite a lot lost in this conflict, since, let's say, negotiations actually took place, i don't know how much it was the finish line, but the negotiations on the provision of guarantees were definitely substantive. security of saudi arabia, the sale of weapons, and on the other hand, the establishment of diplomatic relations, or rather the restoration with israel, and as a bonus for the arab world, it was a kind of compromise solution to the palestinian issue, it is now clear that

the palestinians were primarily affected by this conflict, because a large number they died or will die, there will definitely be no peace prospects for the next five or so years, and of course. that now we see how other europeans are curtailing aid to the palestinian authority, because they see that this money was not used for welfare, not for development, so that, in fact, this hatred of the israeli state was converted into such attacks. of course, there are other victims, countries and their interests, but this is probably the most important thing. mr. oleksandr, we have seen over the past five days how the role of a peacemaker on in the middle east, vladimir putin is preparing himself, or rather, he is doing everything so that representatives of iraq or iran talk about the fact that vladimir volodymyrovych cannot do without your participation, that you

must intervene in this conflict, and here is putin, who in the 90s, first creates conflicts, and then comes to defuse them , well, approximately the same scheme, as you assess, here is putin's attempt to return to the top political league of the world, after what, what is happening , after what is happening in to ukraine, and of course, his prospects in general, to articulate something or to offer something, including washington, well , you know, from him, like water from a goose, he can tell you anything, and again, he does not have such a potential , which he can convert and project, that is, project his... power to some other regions, he can do something precisely, well , for example, how wagner helped to make these state rebellions in the african countries of the sahel region, that is, they can do it, send killers , that they may teach others murderers, so that they would seize power, and of course

, i want to roll out, pump out, i apologize, the resources from there, the actual colonial policy, diamonds, oil, gas, other minerals. russia is not capable of doing something more technological in the middle east, so of course they are in the opec+ format, but it is such, you know , an alliance, very conditional, it just, let's say, unites egoists in a certain sense, and above all saudi arabia, which has a fairly passable relationship with the united states, since the murder of the journalist khashoggi, and of course, critics of how they conduct this war in yemen. operation, and by the way, the same houthis are supported by iran, that is, in fact, iran is trying to create such a complete platform or platforms against its main opponents, first of all, of course , israel and hezbollah, which means hamas, the support

of the houthis and other, let’s say, groups, of course , that russia is not a player here, it can get certain dividends, it can try to shake up the situation, then in social media, with propaganda, with some of its satellites, or with some other things, and of course, it can provide weapons, intelligence information, by the way, what budanov said about, i honestly did not look for this information, that just before the day of this, let's say, terrorist attack, in fact, one of the intelligence satellites of the russian federation, in order to transfer this information to iran and, accordingly, it would definitely fall into the hands of terrorists, so there are definitely such signals being conveyed, but there is no clear involvement, there is definitely no potential. thank you, mr. oleksandr. you for talking, this there was oleksandr khara, a diplomat, a person who knows about foreign policy, everything

, or almost everything, well, friends, i would like to remind you that we are working live on tv channel uso, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are now watch us on youtube , don't be shy, please like this video so that it is trending on youtube, and take part in our survey, today we ask you about who you trust the most options for answers. the president, the armed forces of ukraine, the church, volunteers, or your option, please write in the comments under this video, it is important for us to know your opinion. andriy dyschitsia, politician, diplomat, former acting minister of foreign affairs of ukraine in 2014 . mr. andriy, good evening, i am glad to see you on our broadcast. good evening. i congratulate you, mr. andriy, you are a diplomat with almost 30 years of diplomatic experience. experience, and it is clear that during the last two years we see how international law is ignored

, we see where force and weapons are considered the main tools in any discussions, in your opinion, what and how does diplomacy decide today, well, i will say that diplomacy cannot be done without now either, because diplomacy first of all decides... if we are talking about ukrainian diplomacy, it solves the issues that are necessary for, first of all, ensuring of ukraine with its weapons and ammunition, but also defense of ukraine's interests in the international arena and promotion of ukraine's interests and promotion of ukraine's interests. just a few hours ago, the parliamentary assembly... of the council of europe

recognized the holodomor as genocide, and i remember for how many years ukrainian diplomacy worked to make this happen, it was a joint effort of both politicians and diplomats , parliamentarians first of all, but this is actually what diplomacy does, and it is one direction and the other direction, i think you are right, that now, some states are showing their power in the way of... aggression, but without diplomats it will not be possible to end these conflicts , it will not be possible to end the war, it will not be possible to hold peace negotiations, and any war ends one way or another negotiations and ends with some kind of peace treaty or treatise, and here the role of diplomacy will actually be very significant, general budanov says that a number of regional wars are part of a mosaic of a great global war, well, at least

that is how he sees it, that the conflicts that are now on the planet, they will grow, as a result this will create in the world a global war, the third world war, i understand, well, in the concept of general budanov, do you agree with such a statement, and is it clear to you where it ends... the conflicts that concern the two- three states, for example, as in the middle east, or the conflict between russia and ukraine, and where is it, where do these conflicts turn into global ones? well, look, it seems to me that we are already in a state of global war , because what is happening in ukraine is this, and this level of support and involvement of other... states in supporting ukraine in countering russian aggression , well, it shows

the scale of this, if possible, this war, and the actual involvement of other states, their inclusion, obviously, is not direct, but through the provision of weapons to ukraine, this is also their involvement to such a global, uh, global conflict, if you can say so, not yet a war, but what is happening in other regions of the world, is what is happening in israel, in other places, let's say there in syria or in other places, hot spots, as they were once called in the space of the soviet union, in all these conflicts, moscow is interested, and i think that until we overcome...' russia, until we defeat the kremlin, then the danger of this global world war will

always exist, therefore, i would say that before us is fateful. task before ukraine victory in russia, russia's victory means a reduction in tension on a global scale. well, that is, russia is one of the important elements of destabilization in the world, and it uses the full program of its resources, this means in the middle east, and in the conflict between north and south korea, and on the african continent, and in any other the point where... there could be another fire, right, i understand, absolutely right, absolutely right, that's all we see, all the conflicts, all the tension that arises in certain regions of the world, it is provoked by the activity or activity of russia, russia is interested in keeping this tension, and it is interested in

playing some role in the international. native arena, as they think, further, this is a leading role, although it has long been gone, but nevertheless they create this tension, and thus creating, and even now, let's say, this example, in addition to such military tension, the issue of food supply , russia is creating this food crisis in the world, and thus trying to play a role. influence on the international arena, thereby humiliating other countries, which or forcing other countries to be dependent only on russia, therefore, if we deal with russia, which is this source of evil, then we will automatically solve many problems and conflicts on a global scale .

against the background of what is happening now in israel and in the middle east in general, putin promotes his role as a peacemaker in the palestinian-israeli conflict and says that the situation in the middle east is now as acute as anywhere in the world, let's listen to what said putin, we have a very stable relationship with israel, we have friendly relations with palestine for ten years, our friends know about it, and russia, in my opinion, could also make its own contribution to this process, but this sharpness is such that, in my opinion, we do not see anything like that anywhere , before that putin was in the role of an exiled president, that is , a person who was not given a hand and with whom no one wants to communicate, now for the last five days we see the active promotion of this thesis that putin will make peace,

what russia can do, russia will do, and russia together with iran, and russia together with syria. and a lot of things in the middle east depend on them, what do you think, or in what way, putin can offer himself to the world leaders, from the cages that he flew out of, just what he can now offer to the world, and in what way will the world react to the efforts of the peacemaker, in the pubic area of ​​the peacemaker putin? well, first of all, i think that putin should not be allowed to settle any conflict, chitin or any of the leaders russians, because in reality, as we said a little earlier, russia is interested in the fact that this conflict continues to exist, whether it is a conflict in the middle east between israel and hamas, or palestine, whether it is

a conflict in nagorno-karabakh, whether it is conflict-prone? whether it is the conflict in syria, they are always interested in keeping it alive all the time, thus having the opportunity and important to influence one side and the other, but what i think putin wants to achieve by trying, trying, offering himself to role a peacemaker, is to appear again on the international arena, to appear again among world leaders and show that without russia it will not be possible to cope with such a conflict, and i do not exclude at all that russia itself was interested in provoking such a conflict , and we know that the leaders of hamas visited moscow quite often recently, and therefore it could be absolutely interested in the fact that precisely because of this