it was as if i was consecrating myself and lived only by work. everything that brought joy before that somehow disappeared. then the enemy started shelling our cities and our power line. the days without light, communication and heat have come. i started going on the air and explaining to ukrainians what was happening and what would happen next. at some point, i remembered my old hobby, about photography, because no matter what the crisis, we must leave time for ourselves to be happy here and now. if you want to learn how to help yourself and others, go to how are you.com. now we will have a lot of analysis, because kostik was telling the truth a couple of minutes ago, because now we have valentyn gladkikh in the studio, he is a political analyst of the united ukraine center. our congratulations. good night, thank you for the invitation, thank you for coming, what are we talking about, yes, i, come on, the head of the kremlin, vladimir putin. may

try to freeze the war against ukraine, nato secretary general jen stoltenberg said. at the same time, he assured that kyiv and its allies will do everything to prevent this from happening. quote. of course, there is always the risk that president putin will do this. we saw that he is trying to do everything he can to prevent ukrainians from vacating their land. we will continue our support, we will continue to stand by ukraine. we are doing this because the ukrainian battle. this is our battle. enns stoltenberg, secretary general of nato. and so, mr. valentin, right before you, we had a meeting with a military expert, we remembered the wonderful news from the leadership of the boin campaign, that it is possible that this winter , the shells for hymars, such as glsdb, that we are expecting, may appear in ukraine , which hit at 150 km. i to what

do our partners understand that the risk of freezing the war will be minimized, the more news we have about glsdb , attacks, etc. what is meant, well, that is, there will be some kind of agreement to end, well, i am sure that there will be no such agreement, well , that is, whether we can reach the so-called trench warfare there, the growth of the first world war, or what is called the korean scenario, when the parties there reach , well, military parity on the line of contact, well, i tend to think that such a situation can develop only as a result of willful, conscious efforts, well, but i tend to think that if the will and consciousness make efforts for the other, then this is nothing..

. will not work out, that is, military parity will not work out there, if you continue to put pressure on russia with sanctions and make it impossible for russia to restore its military potential, and on the contrary , help ukraine with weapons, and then it is clear that the bolan forces, well, will not be balanced, well, and that's why it's all such rhetoric that putin can freeze the war, he can only freeze his armed forces in the steppes of ukraine, but winter will soon begin, he can have a little of them there. freeze it, well, okay, well, what about some, let’s say, minsk scenario, yes, how did they sign some or an interim settlement there, well no, this simply cannot be, and this is an unrealistic scenario, i don’t even understand what we we discuss it so much, well, that is, when i communicate, well, often diplomats and journalists have to communicate with foreigners, when they talk about they say that, i ask them the question, how do you imagine it, that is, not just the freezing of the war in general, specifically the sequence of actions, the algorithm.

well, yes, it won't be like that, well, it won't be like that, well, then, if you look at it from another angle, conventionally speaking, for example, what is it for russia, and the freezing of the war, this is a process during which they can regroup something there, to reconfigure something, to patch up the cracks somewhere, to find partners who can give them something, here is the information about the 1000 containers that mr. kirby from the dprk to the russian federation, this can be called an intermediate stage , in which putin received a tactical but victorious one, because after two years , the dprk finally gave the press for something, well, the question, for what, well, again, maybe he is empty the containers were simply sent so that they could be photographed from space and so that it would now be some kind of argument for putin to say that now he will become stronger, we will see everything in the end on the battlefield, well, that is, the containers will eat. but

okay, well, that is, now, if i imagine it that way, the road from that, from those ports where they entered, well, how long will it take until they arrive on the battlefield, moreover, they will go through certain... logistic chains, and we know that today the armed forces of ukraine are very successful are striking at these chains, well, logistical ones, and secondly, they will still be stored in some logistics centers, and we also see that we are successfully striking now, that is, these containers can dissolve, you know, like in that classic of theirs, but in time the dog could grow up, but it can be here on the contrary, however, over time the containers may, well, something with them shake, dry out. er, and er, how to say it, ignite, well completely and well realistically, further, they will still gradually approach, well, directly to use, well, they will still fall into the zone within the reach zone, again

ukrainian, well, artillery, missiles, aviation, drones , that is, it’s okay, well, they put it, it’s clear that it would be better not to put it, it would be better not to have this information, that is, so that there would not be such an impression that it was supposedly okay, they brought it a thousand containers, it’s like okay, no, not okay, it wouldn’t be better, but at the same time, you have to understand that these thousand containers will now give the united states of america a reason to spin the flywheel a bit, well, conditional repression against the north korean regime, well, how will the north korean regime come out of this, well, again , we will see, because having repeatedly said during the visit of this korean leader, if he can be called the leader of a tyrant to russia, what did russia pay for all this? well i went in the opposite direction, okay, thousands of containers have passed here, but why did i go back? it's like they wanted missiles, technology for ballistics, but it is, but again, i tend to think that it's not realistic, because china has these technologies

, both nuclear and missile, but china is in no rush to transfer them to north korea. the question arises, why? well, i know the answer, because china is interested in the fact that north korea. the regime was maximally dependent on china in security matters, so if russia is now on will transfer these technologies and these missiles to korea, roughly speaking, then it is clearly not in the west , china will be from this, that is, it is not really all that self-evident that they are now fruitfully cooperating there, well, we will see, well, that is, what will happen next, that is, i i am sure that even in this way they will not be able to achieve this parity on the line, well, of combat operations for the languages ​​that ukraine will be supported again with the necessary weapons, well, because it is really ridiculous, but to compare the military and technical potential of nato member countries, ugh, and iran and north korea, well that is, even china, even if

china fully engages in this story, well, first of all, china too, it will not be without consequences, if they openly engage in this, well, even if they engage, well, we understand that anyway yes, let's take it, let's open it up and see what the military and technical potentials of these countries are, scientific potentials, economic potentials, so i'll repeat that it's just natural, it just happened and parity was formed, and now nobody can move anywhere, well, it can't to be, it's only as a result, well, let's say, someone's deliberate actions, that is, it is not putin who can freeze the war, putin cannot unilaterally freeze it, well, he does not have the tools for that, but can someone help him in this, well, it is debatable, i tend to think that in view of the statements that we hear, and from nato, today, you literally quoted, and from the united states of america, and from european countries, well, at the moment , nothing indicates that anyone is interested in freezing, by the way, about the united states, the usa, just remain focused on helping

ukraine, including the united states secretary of state states was assured by our minister of foreign affairs, dmytro kuleba wrote about this in social networks based on the results of the telephone conversation. with anthony blinken, it is known that the politicians also discussed the war in israel, they condemned the hamas attack on the country and exchanged views on the dynamics of the conflict and the consequences for global security, and let's recall that earlier the us secretary of defense loyt austin assured that the states could simultaneously to support ukraine in the war against russia and israel in the war with hamas. the question is, as we can see, this is the axis. about which nikita has already started say, moscow, bhenyang, tehran, beijing are in question, they emphasize such non-systemic players, several countries in africa, i will not name them, well, the more famous ones

are hamas, hezbollah, the taliban, in particular, please tell me, this list is what else to go on, is there such an emphasis on extrasystems. support, it is already exhausted, and here it is the maximum, no, not the maximum , well, i think that they, first of all, are the most bright, but they also, i think, fruitfully cooperate and bet on the far-right groups in europe , well, the ultra-left groups in europe, well, they are betting on all those european political projects , which also advocate, well, from xenophobic positions, who profess extremism, well, as a model of political behavior, simply that these political forces in europe are marginal, because there are stable political regimes, and therefore these political forces are there, you know, they are of course present there, but... uh, well, they are in such a frankly marginal position,

for example, if we are talking about the taliban, then this is a type of state power, well, if we are there we are talking about hamas, well, we must understand that hamas is not the whole of palestine , that is, many people have begun to identify with each other here, well , hamas is hamas, and palestine is palestine, that is, to what extent hamas is supported in palestine, to what extent hamas is an expression in general, the general will of the views of the palestinians, the question is debatable, well, but you nevertheless, you must realize that there are other political organizations that can adhere to other views, well, there is a wonderful organization there in africa, it seems to be from the haram side, or somehow, well, just as well, extremism is an outright terrorist there, here it is beautiful in quotes, no, of course, well, that is, it is beautiful from the point of view of the russian federation and, well, other such and such terrorist groups, in fact , the list of such forces in the world is quite large, but they are simply somewhere on the margin, somewhere they are real. constitute a serious power, and even hypothetically can seize power in the conditions of unstable political

regimes, somewhere they are already in power, and i relate these forces only to the fact that they really openly demonstrate unwillingness to put up with the existing world order and the desire to destroy it, and the second point is that they do not just declare, but actually take appropriate actions, they try to achieve their goals with violent and frankly terrorist methods, well, the reaction will be exactly that, that is, it will not be taken away, it has been repeatedly said that the current russian federation differs from this caliphate, or from the islamic state, or from the same taliban, only in that they are a member of the un security council, and they have nuclear weapons, that’s all, but according to their behavior, well, they there are and will continue to be try to rally around yourself, well, these marginals are not even quite correct to say, let's say destructive ones. certain forces, well, but you just have to dig deeper, see why these forces became destructive, how they arose, and whether there are

other ways to counteract and prevent their emergence, there are such ways, and i think you remember that in the times of our childhood, we are now talking about terrorism, mainly about islamic terrorism, this is wrong, by the way, er, and once there was the same one, for example, basque, eta, there was once, in short in ireland, ira, ira, yes. that is, there was once a vrodfront, yes, red brigades, that is, there was once ethno-religious terrorism in europe, there were terrorist organizations of social orientation, there were ethnic orientation, well , nothing, as you can see, this problem was successfully solved, a whole series of tools were used, so i in this regard, he is optimistic that, after all, there are certain tools at the disposal of civilized humanity in order to minimize the risks of the emergence of such organizations, but at the same time there are risks that such terrorist

organizations will seize power in states, and political regimes may be formed in individual states, such as in the russian federation or in iran or in north korea, which are essentially terrorist, that is , which basically say that we will not play by your rules, you don't care about our rules , we won't follow them, and then they only understand the language of power, and it's important to understand that the more they build up this power, the more difficult it will be to talk to them, that's why it's it is also necessary to realize, and i am sure that those people who are involved in the process of development and implementation of relevant political decisions are aware of this, and what is needed in order to reach the apogee when the system players will understand that only the method of force is possible with these non-systemic structures like a terrorist state or terrorist groups to communicate, because today, at least for me, it is my subjective. to the opinion, one gets the impression that the system players continue, if you do not think that with

non-system player can be co-founded, then at least they already think that it is necessary to help those, in this case ukraine, for example, who are trying to knock out this non-system player, well, first of all, here you still have to understand that you know the saying that if in if you only have a hammer in your hands, then all problems appear to be nails, but in reality the world does not work like that, well, that is, even terrorism, that is, it is not... not a nail, that is, a hammer is not the only way to solve the problem of terrorism, once upon a time, one smart analyst of the united states, said that the problem of somali pirates at sea cannot be solved. it is necessary to decide on the ground, well, that is, until there are no other alternatives for the somalis, except to go to sea, to rob ships , well, until then, they will go out, no matter how many times we catch them, do not shoot them, do not exterminate them, that is, they we need to create an alternative, be a weasel, if you want, well, go to sea, be a weasel, you have such an alter, well, prospects, you can not go out, but you

have another alternative then, well, just like before things in colombia fought with drug cartels, well, at first they burned it, actually, it was coca crops and everything else, but in the end they just went a little differently, they began to add other mechanisms to purely forceful actions, so, strictly speaking, ira and eta in europe also did not the methods of force were, well, how to say, well, not even liquidation, because it is also wrong to say that, they were introduced into a certain political process and today they are quite respectable representatives of local political elites, so here it must still be understood that the civilized world is is. civilized, because he has at his disposal much more tools and a much greater variability of behavior, yes, that is, we, as civilized people, are rude, this is also very often the case with ukrainians, who have committed a crime that violated traffic rules, will be shot, raped, shot, killed will be shot, stolen will be shot, listen, the measure of punishment is proportional to the gravity of the crime, that

is, you understand, yes, that is why there are different punishments for different actions, there are different preventive groups. saying steps, so to date, i think that and the behavior of these regimes are different, and we must understand that we cannot behave with russia , no matter how much we would like it, as it behaves, for example, with al-qaeda, well, due to the fact that, as i said, there is a place for the un to break up in russia , nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction, and when people try to solve this problem, they still consider the potential risks, that is, they want to solve this problem with minimal risks, well, they say. like us, we also understand that in principle, we always take into account the balance of potential gains and potential risks, therefore, to sum it up succinctly, i am sure that aid to ukraine and those political regimes that oppose, or are a kind of brakes or alternatives to the emergence of similar

or such destructive regimes, will only increase, because i repeat, the problems of these regimes cannot be solved only on... they must be solved on the ground, and we understand that the change of the political regime in russia is connected with the results of the war in ukraine, that is, these two processes are interconnected, so i i think that all this rhetoric about whether someone is tired of something or they won't help is completely meaningless , and even if they wanted to, they simply don't have such an option, because they perfectly understand what it is , which will be a chain reaction of these processes. well, i understand, let’s take a moment for the russian ipso, ukraine did not supply the militants with weapons, these are just fakes from russian propagandists, said the advisor to the head of the president’s office mykhailo podelyak, according to him, the western partners they closely monitor the use of weapons provided to ukraine, and if

trophy weapons from ukraine got through russia to the doterists, then these are units. we live in an information world. radio-electronic intelligence makes it possible to track all heavy weapons, where, who moves them and how, everything is tracked, everything is clearly understood. total control over heavy weapons, which ukraine received. let's move on to small arms, to grenade launchers, javelins and so on. yes, you can win a trophy and give something. so much so, i don't even want to say the word stupid analytical community of other countries that does not understand. that two javelins that will be found there somewhere, or an rpg9, or several dozens of assault rifles is a trifle, and it is nonsense to believe that ukraine is providing someone with weapons, despite the fact that everyone absolutely clearly understands the relations between hamas and the russian federation. mykhailo podalyak, adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine. well, according to the logic

of the rashists, then the one or two merkavs who were forced to go to the territory, the gasses ... this also turns out to be israel helped the militants, yes in the supply of weapons, but again, no matter how absurd this or that information-psychology and information-psychology operation is, for now they will still continue to use it, and considering the fact that they continue it anyway to use, at whom then it is directed, not at politicians, but at people, those or others at people at politicians, well, that is , you have to understand that you know, if the results of ipso, well, you are not visible, then you were not the target of this ipso, well, that is, you have to understand that all the same, they achieve certain goals, but we are even discussing this now and you just know someone as a ulo. impressive, yes, that is, someone there has not heard, but says, oh, they are already discussing it, so it is basically a serious topic, well, but this topic was actually closed last year, when this sparts was, yes,

which talked about that ukraine is selling something through third countries, then the americans came and said that we got acquainted with the accounting system that ukraine introduced for the weapons that we provide, it exceeded our expectations, that is, the weapons that we will receive... haimar apparently did not see it , yes, that hamas would use it there, well , that's why it's all a subtle delusion, well, it's just the second part, by the way of theirs, too psoi is very sad to see that they are being spread in ukraine as well, about the fact that the military complex is allegedly falling apart in ukraine and that really, soon we will have nothing to fight there, that is, on the one hand, they want us not to be given weapons, because they were afraid, they in particular, they influence the local substrate, yes, through their journalists. worked out public opinion, public opinion influenced politicians, politicians based on public opinion formed in this way began to hesitate, maybe it is really not worth giving weapons, this is one

direction of work, the second is the same story about the fact that we do not produce anything there, today i am literally talking about this was written by the post, it is very strange, but how does the information disseminated by some ukrainian journalists and bloggers about the fact that nothing is being produced in ukraine correlate with the information that just the other day the sbu with... liquidated two russian ships with their own drones, which themselves are being developed, and the kid said about it, that at his own company somewhere they are developing these drones, these seibis, and those kartos, what will they be called, cardboard drones that flew over russian airfields, it seems to me that these two pieces of information, that nothing is being developed , and the fact that we destroy some of their facilities with our weapons is somehow disconcerting, but i repeat , someone heard, and now you go to social networks, and you will see, here is this whining about the fact that everything... adultery is full, everything is gone, everything has been destroyed, someone is being prevented from working, which is typical, that for some reason everyone is here

drones were not developed by the companies that are now complaining that they are being prevented from working, that , unfortunately , i did not see any incentive from these companies to develop something and give it to the armed forces of ukraine for use, so you are right in that that for all the absurdity, this is an absurd situation both the first and the second, because there are results, well, destroyed airfields, destroyed ships, but nevertheless there is still rhetoric that everything is lost, nothing, we will all die and things like that, therefore it finds its addressees, you understand, and it has a cumulative effect, that is, one, the second, the third, and it accumulates, accumulates, they affected these with one story, others were affected by another story, the third were affected by some other story, as a result, a certain psychological background, a certain emotional background, and this emotional background is then realized in a certain pattern of behavior, so you have to understand that even domestic conflicts, when there are any

, excuse me, yes, the blogger is driving on the bridge at night, it makes people very nervous, you understand, and then read the comments that are there write, therefore in such conditions, it is necessary to understand that not all the ipso, which we are discussing now, which lie on the surface, because here everything is really very simple, yes, hamas has already tied it there, but what. other trinkets, which at first glance are imperceptible at all, but if you see that these trinkets cause a lively emotional reaction in society, it means that specialists have worked here, we have less than three minutes, mr. valentine, you can conclude, where is the line between, constructive criticism and support, russian narratives and russian epso, well, it seems to me that when your statements are quoted in the un by the representative of russia, huh, and the statements are questionable to say the least , so i think that there are already reasons for

even special training and specially authorized bodies to be interested in you, because it looks a little strange, and when it happens with with a certain periodicity, ugh, that is, once it can be a coincidence, well, the second time there are already doubts, and when from time to time with a certain periodicity... in someone's rhetoric, roughly speaking, those positions and statements that coincide with those positions and statements coming from the russians, well it seems to me that you can simply do a content analysis and see, yes, how often the positions of individual ukrainian bloggers, politicians, public and political figures coincide with the positions and theses and rhetoric, respectively , there, i don't know, on their propaganda channels, to a great extent. .. it’s a pity, it is, remember who pumped up the sparts scandal in ukraine, what political forces , look now, who today is telling again about the fact that we will be betrayed, we will be abandoned, we will not be

supported, who are you but you, not you? or what his name was quoted in europe, fu in europe, voon, who told about tyranny here in ukraine? huh, i think it's time to think about that, so constructive criticism is constructive criticism, constructive criticism should be based on, it should be directed at a rational response, not an emotional one, if you only see what someone's statements provoke in you an emotional reaction, and not a desire to discuss or with some arguments about this, this is most likely the limit where we can distinguish constructive criticism from the mere suggestion of emotional contagion and, well, certain destructive effects on human consciousness and behavior, yes , mr. valentin, thank you, of course i would like to ask more, but we are told here that we only have 40 seconds, only my question, so 40 seconds will take, that's why i'm asking off the air, valentin glykh is a political analyst of the united ukraine center,

he was a guest of our studio, thank you. thank you, thank you, it's time for us to give the floor to the news, olga hrytsyk, continue! chevronons approaching victory, we ukrainians, citizens of no country, this year we are not celebrating again, we are defending, just as our ancestors did, hundreds of years in a row. we are not afraid of the enemy or his missiles, because we are at home, on our land.

with your language, with your flag, the flag of free people, ukraine, colors that you don't confuse with anything , colors that inspire, colors that unite and give hope, that's why we fight for the future, for freedom, fight, fight , for their sacred right to live, one... fate of one kind, the independence of ukraine and the creation of an independent ukrainian state of ukraine, indomitable, free, brave, those who prove it every day, yes. help your child

not to fall into a trap on the internet. the first and most important rule is to talk to your children about cyber safety. don't be a controller and don't ban. be the adult who helps and protects the child. the prohibition method does not work. trust is effective. read more tips in the cybersecurity section of the dovidka website. info. let's go together. it is two o'clock in ukraine and now about the most important thing at this time. i'm olga hrytsyk, good night, and let's start with fiery night in kursk. around midnight there were three explosions. propaganda media reported that there were at least four bursts of what appeared to be a drone attack. they counted 12 pieces that were allegedly shot down by

a russian. air defense a little earlier, the crimean public wrote about the fire that broke out on the gas pipeline near simferopol and damba with the crossing through sivash to the kherson region. the previous strike was carried out from the american hymars multiple-launch fire system. also, a loud explosion was heard on saturday evening in the temporarily occupied sevastopol, where the local authorities do not report. on saturday morning, the russian city of sochi woke up to explosions, footage of drones was published on telegram channels, loud sounds were heard and a cloud of smoke was visible on the video, residents of the coastal region also complained that part of the houses were left without electricity, the enemy ministry of defense assured that they shot down two uavs . it's a real hell in the direction of vdyiv, but the ukrainian military manfully defends itself, in a day they repelled eight enemy attacks near.