[000:00:00;00] as they say, ready for the fact that a massive , massive shelling may begin here, but israel is ready to fight back, that's clear, look , a few days ago, and the israeli military forces carried out, well, a bomb strike, so to speak, bombed the aleppo airport and in syria, and this was on the eve of the arrival in syria of the minister of foreign affairs of iraq, so iran, i apologize, so you see here, and the intelligence worked, and everything from us worked, and i think that, here already our know what and how to do, hezbollah is certainly strong organizations, there is nothing to talk about here, but we are also strong, you know, here i remembered , goldamey once said how she was asked what

the situation was, we were all talking about nuclear weapons, she said: no, in we do not have it, but if necessary, we will apply it, then this situation is possible , god forbid, of course, to atomic, to atomic weapons, to atomic war, but i still think that israel before the collision and the war on at midnight, ready for almost 100%, the south taught us, these were very difficult days for us, but the south gave us a good good lesson, the last maybe a question, public opinion... in israel, israel is a well-known democratic country, one of the few in the middle east, to put it mildly, and that is why power and politicians depend on the population, on the people, this is democracy, what public opinion says , it is necessary to destroy hamas, that is, no one will play anymore, because everything, everything that i followed, even when i was a child, when i watched the vremya program in the soviet

union, i... knew that the jews were bad, and the palestinians were good , they suffer there, and the jews are all like that, the big caricatures there are so thick, with with such bellies, and the united states is always behind them, and yes, how is the israeli military, i remember this since childhood, and these harsh actions in relation to palestine were constantly postponed, well, let's agree, well, come on, now it's like this saw the whole world, what do the israelis think, what do the jews in israel think? well, i think that this is the entire opinion of all the residents of israel, it is so public, it is all the same, that hamas must be destroyed, by the way, the israeli government also says that it is necessary to destroy hamas completely, absolutely, because defense army

israel before she intended to come with a ground operation, she scattered such leaflets and asked, warned the residents of the northern part of the gaza strip to move to the south, so that they would not be harmed, of course, the ground operation has its own nuances there, because of the fact that it is there there are almost 120 hostages, and it is clear that if the army goes there with a ground operation , then all these poor people will be hostages, who knows what their fate will be, but there is only one thought - to destroy hamas down to the last person, because , well man, it's very nice, i said to one, due to the fact that some more time will pass, a year, two, 10, they will raise their heads again, and as we see now, they will be more prepared, more active, that is why there is a common single opinion in

israel and both the government and the people, kamas must be destroyed, thank you very much, a bright voice, a journalist from israel, from the city of karmiel, this is a city in the north, right there is hezbollah, the most dangerous neighbor, thank you very much, and now we are in the baltics, in the baltics, why are we going to the baltics, because there is a member of the european parliament, well, yes, there is... and if he is will appear, as soon as i ask him a question in russian , i ask everyone's forgiveness, well, here's a question, hello pyatros , these new passports have appeared, that is, the active part of the discussion has begun, for good russians to give

some passports, this was the last time after the revolution, the so-called bolshet communist coup, in the year 17 , led by a large immigration and people found themselves without passports, then nanson passports began to be distributed to just such people, how to find them, five times, how to determine good russian bad, this is the main discussion, because we know five, well, 10 good russians in kiev, and hundreds call themselves good russians, and how to define him... he may be against putin, but crimea is russia, and you, it is impossible to understand how it is in the same head, here putin is bad, and here crimea is russia , it is completely unclear what the european parliament thinks

about this, please, yes, good evening to all , glory to ukraine, first of all, i must say , that this idea appeared as a result of the preparation of a new report. according to the relationship future relations, the european union, russia, this is a proposal of one group of parliamentarians who want to consider or have such a proposal for the european union to introduce so-called democratic passports for those who, for those russians who, in their opinion, should have the right to enter the european union to get a job, i will tell you frankly my opinion, i think that it is not our problem to determine which russian is good, which is bad, or which is pro-putin, which is anti-putin, they should do it, by the way, this

big headache should not be on our side, i think in general that we are too much involved in these things, you know, that we constantly think about what the future will be in russia, i i think that we need to think more about ourselves, that is, about the european union, about our partners , for example, ukraine or moldova, those countries that want to follow the western democratic path and the path of freedom and sovereignty, and this proposal for me is something putinitsa, i think you know this, we will start some kind of church here, will separate right-believing, left-believing or correct believers, bad... believers, and so on, this is some kind of ideological, in my opinion, confusion that will lead us nowhere, on what basis to determine now which russian is good, russian is good or bad

, too much, i would say muddy water for me, those who want to fight against putin, and we see the results and we see their clear statements, well done, it’s necessary, because this is a common problem, especially a russian problem, and this society must - of course they will solve the problem that they have created for themselves and for the world around them, especially for their neighbors and closest neighbors, so i don't think that we should rush into this showdown, there is a good one, a bad one, and how do we just start it to do, you know, always - the most extreme are those who decide for this or that, and those who, that is, those who need to be decided, in what - place they should stand, they are always in the right place, so i i do not think that this is promising, i will not support

this, as far as your opinion coincides with in the opinion of the europeans, i am with you, i absolutely agree with what you said for a simple reason: as much as they helped russia and bolshevik russia in the nineties, these legs of bush, syringes, money, billions, tens of billions rebuilt, helped, listen , let's go to the thirties of the last century, all the factories are german or american, all the factories are german, the engineers are american, german, well, everything was done for russia, and it attacks, attacks, kills, kills, but to what extent people in europe agree that enough is enough to help, let's give... let them spin in the bank there and let them solve their problems, after all, maybe in 100 years they will choose some anti-putin, i do not really believe, but suddenly, but it is important to understand that we have had enough of thinking in ukraine,

in latvia in lithuania, in the baltics, in sweden, in germany, oh, poor russians, let 's think about them, somehow, well, they've already thought about it, for centuries they thought about pulling them out of barbarism, out of savagery into civilization. it doesn't work, what you say, i'll say, you know, you reason very correctly, i also support yours, so the way, reasoning, it's very right. because you speak, i speak, we speak with the words of our experience, experience that has always been more critical in relation to other western countries, which argued that if we lead or if russia follows the path of a market economy, it is like then everything will be resolved there, with democracy, you know, maybe, maybe it is not even close to such, i would say

full absolute democracy, but so... acceptable to everyone, and it was, in my opinion , the way to nowhere, and he led russia, as they say, that's it into kleptocracy, authoritarianism, and authoritarian economy, which means that society is not free and always looks for the guilty not within, but somewhere nearby, so i don't think that we need to rush into such. they lead nowhere, i don’t know why such proposals are being made, probably , people who have a completely different historical experience say, my historical experience is of a completely different nature, i think that russia needs to be helped, of course, it becomes a normal country, but starting with politics, that is, if society goes along, at least slowly along the path of democracy, then it is possible to increase aid, but

not without any conditions, as they say, and so on, if everything goes like this again, we will only give more, er, the more we help russia, the better it will be, nothing like that, because that there is such a kleptocracy, such corruption in the country, as they say, the kremlin propaganda will explain what you know, the west feels guilty before us, so it helps, and this is your historical right to receive help from... the west and not even help , they will say compensation for all mistakes, which they did, on your account, and that means to such a degree , so you know, while such propaganda and such theft , kleptocracy and corruption, i think that they will think about such abstract topics, it is even dangerous, but the last question or the penultimate, now we

we know, the israeli-palestinian conflict... a huge war is going on, and we see in europe, left-wing politicians somehow very briefly said, oh-oh-oh, hamas is wrong, and then they say very loudly and very long, the jews are wrong, let's go somehow we will do something with them, here are these left-wing politicians, they might have some kind of excursion to the gulag, or show them to siberia, that’s the left... lenin, stalin, that’s the left, that’s what they led to, look, by the way, hitler is also a leftist, national- the socialist party of germany, it is also not right-wing, look at the concentration camps, look at the death of people and so on, it's just wild for me, when the beginning is forgotten and we all look from the middle, afghanistan is the problem of america, it was not the soviet union that attacked afghanistan ,

belgrade was bombed in the balkans, belgrade was not bombed milosevic began to fight with croats and slovenes, with everyone around him, he fought for 10 years, until finally a bomb was thrown on his head, and here too, there is no more hamas attack, we forgot, israel is fighting in the gaza sector, oh - ai-ai, where are these people from, what to do with them, here are these leftists, movements in europe? i will say briefly, these are people who do not read history, who do not know examples, they do not know the fact that all communists from nazi germany who fled to the soviet union either ended up in the gulak or were sent back maybe even in a concentration camp, in germany, or died from stalin's bullets, that is, these are people who believe in some, you know, good, that

is, they have postulate number one, that the west is always to blame, postulate two, that the west should always compensate, they will help those countries that the leftists will point out, and you said correctly, already this week, already on monday and tuesday, there were cries and criticism towards israel, that is, the country that suffered first, and one and a half thousand people died, and these are mostly civilians, the same like in buche or irpin, by the way, the same left forces, they also criticize ukraine and ... they say that yes, you know, but there are problems with democracy, even problems in relation to the so-called donetsk and luhansk territories and so on, so that they are not looking for the guilty in those ranks, and they do not want to solve the reasons, everything, as they say, stems from the fact

that the israeli occupation, that is the main problem, despite the fact that peace negotiations and agreements were reached, you have to live by them, and... as they say, murder is murder, and there are no other political ones, so it is explained and so on, i don’t think that this one, you know, will end only with the situation in israel, we will probably have other situations when the left forces will be like this, and by the way, they encourage , in most cases, in all cases, these are the demonstrations, the pro-palestinian demonstrations in the west, which are again led by terror and the killing of people, so this is a big problem, by the way, which will be dealt with by the session of the european parliament in strasbourg on the second week, i think , we we will hear something that has not been heard yet. thank you, thank you very much, piatra auštryavichus, a lithuanian politician, a member of the european parliament was with us, now we will look for an opportunity to talk

with tigran smalyan, the head of the european party in armenia, but before that i have to say the following, not forced, i would like to say this, i remember, in 10-15 years, such an article appeared, an editorial article, such a very famous, egyptian newspaper, there is alya temple, and it is very popular in the muslim world, in the arab world, and there the editor of the editorial office i was just describing this attitude towards america , about which piatra just said that america has a lot of critics, americans also have critics, and there are even more such critics in the muslim world than in europe. and this alyagram wrote so much that at first she wrote a lot of negative things. america is bad here, bad here and wrong here, here is a mistake, here is the ideology in general, here the philosophy is bad, they do not understand us, and then at

the end there were literally several sentences, but god forbid, god forbid, america will stop, well if the coordination... processes in the world, we would find ourselves in an all-out war the next day, the same way now, when they say, yes, they sent the air force, they help there, they don't help, but it's at least some kind of police officer, you understand, humanity you can't, like in the city, in the village, everyone, when everyone doesn't like the police, well, many places don't like the police, maybe with the exception of britain, where they are good at it. bobby is like that, but she's not armed there , you mean, but when something hurts, everybody calls certain numbers and they say come and help, and america was like that for a long time

a policeman, such a gendarme, and as it decreased its influence in europe, the number of bandits increased, and you can’t do anything, and it was the decrease of this influence, when the americans themselves believed, well, there is no soviet union, everything is fine, we are one power, russia will not behave like the soviet union, will not interfere in various countries and remain there, because the americans can enter, but then leave, as a rule, and if it remains, then with the knowledge and and and they have democratic governments there, who say stay there is no need to leave us, from us, everything is done differently in russia, and that is why they have to understand that there is no... there is no gendarme, as in the village, as in the city, there is no police, and today these bandits will be humiliated, but tomorrow they'll see, no, there's nobody, come on, i'll go, kill somebody , knock somebody down, get somewhere, steal something and so on, and so on, and that's why this moment, certainly nobody likes

a monopoly, ah, america , well, in fact, now it remains a monopoly, a monopoly, a policeman for the free world, for the unfree world, i think that the policeman will be either russia or china , but these are their problems if they want to live and elect such leaders and not go out en masse in the streets with protests and fight and not end up in prisons, as this is love, as they do in all over the world, in democratic countries, when people go out, like the ukrainians went out on the maidan, realizing that they can kill and imprison, but... there is no other option, so all this should be kept in mind that america is not perfect, but if in the apartment called the globe will not have its own policeman. then it will turn into well then

there won't be this apartment and everything will be simple with us, a nuclear bomb will go off somewhere, now you and i will move to the southern caucasus, as always , we have all this, he tells comments, shares his thoughts, mikhmyan, the head of the european party of armenia, he will now appear before naygran, hello, thank you for finding time for us . congratulations, thank you, look here, well , the main question, an important question, i will not discuss that aliyev came to stepa kert and raised the flag there, but they will not meet pashinyan and aliyev in any way, first of all, aliyev is not going to spain, and pashinyan goes there, then pashinyan goes to kyrgyzstan, and there he is. aliyev, how much, here, but everyone says that at the end of the year, some agreement can still be signed if they do not

meet each other, how can they sign an agreement or agree to sign it if they are friends never recently, they have not seen each other, i think that here geography becomes politics, you perfectly understand the difference, where do they meet, do they meet in? of spain, that is, in the west, and this means under the auspices of the european union and the united states, or meet in kyrgyzstan on the territory of the cis, the odb, under the control of russia, eh, all that armenia is trying to do is to escape from russian control, we pay very dearly for this, but we understand that otherwise, we are doomed, we will stay , otherwise hostages.

and the slaves of the colonial wars of russia, because now is the war that took place in the twenties and the twenties, which ended with the patrioticide of the armenians of artsakh , the deportation of armenians from artsakh, as in their time they deported the chechens, crimean tatars, as 100 years ago they deported the armenians of the west armenia, so this is now becoming not just a war between azerbaijan and russia and turkey against armenia, now it is a war between the west and the east, it is a war for control over a strategic area - the border of armenia and iran, because this border is the desired path, the corridor desired by putin, aliyev and erdogan. this area is necessary for putin, first of all, in order to continue the war with ukraine, selling through, controlling... them now

together with azerbaijan, karabakh and nakhchivan, and also, the southern region of armenia is a pillar that they are now trying to wrest from armenia at any cost, in order to simultaneously leave armenia with southern access to iran, then to the far east, and also to leave all opportunities to georgia, because according to the plan of putin and aliyev, baku dzhikhan and tebelis' tank. the railway, gas, and oil pipelines that now pass through turkey will pass precisely along this new southern route, which russia must control, that was the condition of the war of the 20th year, that is why russia was so enthusiastically helping azerbaijan in the twenty-third year, now, the fact is that three geopolitical projects collided in our region, this is just a question. mr. tigran, do you believe the us state department, which says that within a few weeks

, another attack by azerbaijan on armenia is possible, right there, in the south, as you say, exactly in those areas, and this aggression will resume again, and what will the armenians do in this case, if it is true, if this happens, the words of state secretary blinkin were several... torn from context, he actually met with us congressmen and spoke about the need to coordinate efforts to prevent a new attack by azerbaijan with russian participation, or rather with russian support, on the southern section of the armenian border in order to break through to turkey. blinkin spoke about this seriously, and it's impossible not to believe him, but that's why i say that it's not

easy to face each other here. his oil and gas, he can feed the war in ukraine, not for nothing, i remind you all the time, the day before the attack on ukraine, putin hosted the president in the kremlin aliyeva. so, the project, the ussr2, here coincides with the project of turkey of azerbaijan, about the great turan, about the great turan, they hope to break through on land, through the south of armenia, and the only thing that can prevent this is the third geopolitical project, which is carried out by the european union and the united states , this is a north-south project that should connect the black sea, ukrainian and georgian ports through georgia, armenia with the middle east, through iran, because the liberalization of iran is very

important, it is a very important point in geopolitical projects of the west, now, that's why there is such a thing..." for a small section of the border that connects armenia with iran. lord tegran, well, anyway, what will armenia do in this case? i just don't see, no i see some good moves, well, no, i don't believe that nato troops will appear there, i don't imagine myself coming there, unfortunately, the american one will not arrive there, like on the shores of the eastern mediterranean. yes, because of the conflict - hamas and israel, that is, it is completely unclear, i am not sure what iran will help you, although iran has good relations with armenia, as far as i understand, what the armenians do, as you know, is better than me, there are also no american aircraft carriers in ukraine now,

there are no nato troops, at least not any serious ones scales therefore, we will do the same thing as you. it was not for nothing that i said all these months that you and i are in the same place, we will defend ourselves and fight, we will defend our freedom and independence at any cost, just as you do, just like my compatriots, citizens ukrainians do it in ukraine. we will fight for our independence at any cost, eh, this is not subject to any doubts and just as they help you, even without aircraft carriers, they help us, they help those who are fighting, we continue our struggle, those who think that all the questions have already been resolved, it is not like that, but a very speculative question, you can answer it speculatively, what is the percentage probability that azerbaijan will continue its expansion into the territory

of armenia, 40%, 50%, 90%, we can talk about i understand that armenians do not trust they probably have a basis for azerbaijanis, but still, how big is this probability? i am not a stock player, but the calculations here are meaningless, because these meanings are important in a democracy with dictators, any logical constructions are meaningless, who could believe that putin would be so insane as to attack ukraine, he did it, we cannot discuss the logic of the second little dictator, the oil king of baku, ilham aliyev, he can try to do it, but in the same way as the attack on ukraine and the war in ukraine will become the end of the russian empire, just like their

allies, azerbaijan and turkey, will pay very dearly for the continuation. thank you very much, tigran smilyan, head of the european party of armenia, thank you very much, we just have news coming, if i don't tell slovnieva melnyk with the news now, she will fire me from my job, and i like working at espresso, so the floor is given to ani yelnik. thank you for your work, have a good evening, the news team will continue to work,