[000:00:00;00] tsabel spoke, 81st yefimov and his colleagues do not insist, 82-83 tzabal spoke, 84 yefimov and his colleagues do not insist, 85 the committee on economic development does not insist, 86 zaburanna, does not insist, 87th amendment, kovalev does not insist, 88th amendment movchan does not insist, 80 i apologize 90 yefimov, does not insist, 91sha yefimov with colleagues does not insist, 92 yefimov with colleagues. does not insist, yes 93 razumko has already spoken on this amendment, 94th 95th hammer does not insist, 96th tsabel has already spoken, 97th magera does not insist, 98 razumko has already spoken, 99 starling does not insist, sota zabal has spoken, 101- vasylevska smoglyuk does not insist, 102 krulko does not insist, 104th tzabal has already spoken,

105 mazurashu, approaches me. hryhoriy hryhorovych said that instead of 105, 108, 111, 112, 114, 240th, he asks to give 3 minutes and put only 240 to the vote, i am correct, please, mazurasho, george mazurasho, servant of the people, 203rd district , i want to focus attention on that amendment 240, which provides for the limitation of maximum salaries in the public sector during martial law by ten minimally i would like to draw the attention of colleagues that such a restriction was already introduced in the same way through the law on the state budget in 2020, based on the government's proposals, and then the constitutional court recognized these restrictions as unconstitutional, but there it is written in the decision that they consider restrictions during the hearing to be unconstitutional, but possible in

under the conditions of martial law and a state of emergency, and here i propose that for... during the state of martial law, limit the maximum salaries in the desh sector to ten minimums, you see, we have some trash now, that is, on the one hand, society will actively discuss there are some fantasized salaries, nazhdeps there are 2000, then 240 and so on, at the same time we do not want to limit the actual maximum salaries for those who actually receive hundreds under martial law. thousands, and some a million or more, and of course, we are not talking about those de -servants who receive small salaries there, and it does not concern them, the absolute majority, because in our state sector, as they say, as they said in a joke, the state pretends , which pays, and people pretend to work sometimes, and about those who receive even in the conditions martial law, hundreds of thousands and millions more, oil and gas and so on, there is no such thing in a warring country, in a warring country the military should earn the most on

the front lines. the military is on the front line, not even in the headquarters, on the front line, so i am very much asking you, colleagues, to support this 2004 amendment, which i will put into consideration, and i will also remind you that the military from the front line, from kostyantynivka, from other established points, settlements, where i have been recently, society asks us to be frank, asking us to speak frankly, communicate with society, if we have restrictions on the constitutional rights of citizens, which cannot be restricted even under martial law, this applies, for example, there, restrictions on leaving, male citizens during war and abroad and so on, then you must speak frankly and tell the government that you are violating, you cannot do this, even in the conditions of martial law, it is important, and this amendment, which will be repeated by 240, which i will put

into consideration, is about justice , ago that we say that in the conditions of martial law we have to tighten the belts, at the same time someone receives hundreds of thousands and millions more in the public sector, this should not be the case, only the military can receive more than ten minimums during martial law, thank you, dear colleagues, i understand that we put 240, that's right, i put 240 the amendment authored by mazur, that it was rejected by the committee, i ask for a vote. for 45 no decision was made 105 mazorash passed 106 krulko does not insist , he already tymoshenko 107 spoke 109 krulko spoke

110. tymoshenko spoke, 111. mazurasha spoke, 112. mazurasha spoke, 113. krulko does not insist, 114. mazurasha spoke, 115. tsabal spoke. 116. yefimenko with colleagues does not insist. 117, krulko does not insist, 118, tsabel has already spoken, 119, zheliznyak yaroslav ivanovich, does not insist , 120th, khlapuk, maxim, insists, does not insist, 121 zhupanin does not insist, 122- gerus does not insist, 123- krasov, does not insist insists, 124- krulko does not insist, 125- tzabal has already spoken, 126-the railwayman does not insist, 127- a slob, not a nap 128-a, i apologize, zhupanin does not insist, 129th gerus does not insist, 130- krasov, does not insist, 131 krulko does not insist, 132

razumkov, razumkov, 132, please, thank you, ruslan oleksiyovich, 132 correction, it is quite important, according to second paragraph, article 20, of the business partnership project. in the authorized capital, which are the corporate rights of the state and business companies, 50 percent or more of the shares owned by business companies, the share of the states, which is 100%, which did not make a decision on the calculation of dividends until 1 coming may, well, i won't have time to read it, it's an important amendment, it will make it possible to increase revenues to the state budget, make it possible to work more transparently, reduce option risks, i hope, unfortunately, the specialized committee did not support it, i hope that the hall will vote, but looking at the potential that exists, i understand that most likely it will not happen, ruksala andriivna, if possible, give an explanation why the committee did not support her, why she did not enter

the committee, thank you, the position of the committee on the 132nd editor razumkov with his colleagues, the norm is in effect the law says that if...' a state-owned enterprise has not made a decision on the recalculation of dividends, then these dividends will be forcibly withdrawn from them, if we cancel these norms, then this will lead to a lack of income from the state budget, our internal resources by many billions of hryvnias, we we can't allow this, because in that , defense is financed from the dividends of state-owned enterprises? you insist on this amendment, yes , amendment 132 by razumkov and colleagues, it

was rejected by the committee, please vote for 37, the decision has not been made, the next amendment, 134 the railwayman does not insist 130. the boy does not insist, and she , i'm sorry, she is partially taken into account, but he 136 zhupani does not insist, 137 gerus does not insist, 138, handsome does not insist, 139 krulko does not insist , 140- the committee on humanitarian information policy does not insist, 141-zhymyrinetskyi does not insist, 132 yefimov does not insist, i apologize 142 now 143 vasylevska smaglyuk does not insist, 144th vasylchenko does not insist. 145 yefimov and his colleagues do not insist, 146 krulko does not insist, 148 tsabal does not insist, 149, the committee on economic development does not insist, 150th molotok does not insist, 151st - yefimov and

his colleagues do not insist, 153 the committee on the organization of state power does not insist, 154- the committee on the organization of state power does not insist, 155 and the same committee does not insist, 156 frolov does not insist, 157 committee: on the organization of state power does not insist, 158 tsabal does not insist, 159, the committee on the organization of state power does not insist, 160 trityakovova does not insist, 161 mykysha does not insist , 163, insists, i apologize, please, mykysha, thank you, ruslan oleksiiovych, roksalan andriivna, here is the 161st amendment, she says, well, this is a purely technical amendment, we are just introducing an additional paragraph that will help a, construction, new construction, reconstruction, restoration, capital repair of objects, research infrastructure , there taking into account the need to create conditions for access of scientists to advanced research infrastructures in the european union, i do not understand why this is primarily important for

the same national research fund and for of other innovation funds, the technical possibility to do appropriate things, why not contribute it, i do not understand, tuna is not a resource, it does not require additional money. it does not require additional resources, it's just that in the text we actually allow it to be done in the future , why it was rejected, it is not clear to me, if possible, please give an explanation, thank you, briefly the position of the committee, please. the amendment is proposed to be rejected, because it expands the list of directions for the use of funds in the fund for liquidation of the consequences of armed aggression, despite the fact that next year we have there will be no stable income from this fund. we will have income from the sale of confiscated russian assets, but it is a big question to what extent the state property fund will be able to sell them. in addition, the budget of the 24th year lays down the general principle of capital expenditures and directing all

possible funds to the needs of defense and rehabilitation of servicemen. insist on this amendment, mykisha's amendment 161, it was rejected by the committee, the author insists on its consideration, i put amendment 161, i ask for a vote. no decision was made for 37 the next amendment 130 163 i apologize tarasenko with colleagues does not insist 165 frolov does not insist 166 zadorzhnyi does not insist 100 168 for the road does not insist 169 committee on the organization of state power does not insist 171 is does not insist with colleagues 173 committee on economic development does not

insist 174 yefimov from colleagues do not insist 175- tsabal does not insist 176 yefimov with colleagues does not insist 188 yefimov with colleagues does not insist 178 vasyl ivanovich mokan does not insist 179 trytyakova galina mikolagaye 191sha movchan rejected does not insist. 1922 1922 koval does not insist, 193 zaburana does not insist, further 197, marusiak and colleagues do not insist, 198 rudyk does not insist, 199 mother and colleagues do not insist, 200 tymoshenko and colleagues have their say, 201 ivchenko does not insist, 202- tretyakovova does not insist, 203

morusyak with colleagues doesn't insist, 204 the roe deer doesn't insist, uh, volodymyrovych, you won't insist at all, you will later, yes, fine, i'll give it later, because it's already been missed, 205 rudyk, doesn't insist, 206 mom with colleagues doesn't insist , 207, tymoshenko and her colleagues spoke out, 208 ivchenko, vadim did not insists, 209 tymoshenko and her colleagues have spoken, 210 trytyakova does not insist, 211 the committee on economic development does not insist, 213- tymoshenko and her colleagues have spoken. 215 pivovarov does not insist, 216 the committee on economic development does not insist , 217 shulyak does not insist, 218 negulevsky does not insist, 270 220 i apologize, goncharenko, you insist , goncharenko, please, dear friends, i want to further inform you about the figures on which people really live, because i understand. here

it is possible, you know, we are watching, over there, a wedding in lviv, with a cake for uah 100,000, a height of 2 m, where the wedding, the newlyweds, this is an ex-prosecutor and an ex-employee of the sbi, we understand that they have a different understanding of what money is and what kind of money is needed, by the way a very interesting question, how did they work so hard in the prosecutor's office and in the dbbr to do such a wedding, well, people are shocked by this. and we need to talk about it and deal with it and give answers, because it cannot be like this that someone, let me remind you, a nurse today, who saves lives, lives on 4-5 hryvnias a month, that is two years for one cake you have to earn, an educator the kindergarten is the same, an employee of the ukrzaliznytsia who transports our wounded, who rescues every day, there is a pitiful few thousand hryvnias of the conductor, well, it is a shame, the position of the committee on the 220th according to this amendment, the author

proposes to write off the debt of local budgets to the state budget in the amount more than uah 10 billion. that is, the state budget gave a loan instead of paying single mothers or the military, or giving support to businesses, it gave a loan to local budgets to lay paving stones, or rather, they were there no more, much more noble goals, but you... they are, as always, for construction, and now a number of authors propose to forgive this debt, the budget committee does not support this.

well, you heard the position of colleagues 220 goncharenko's amendment was rejected by the committee, i ask you to vote for 28 no decision was made, the amendment remains rejected 221 mushroom rejected does not insist 222 223 buzhanskyi, but it is partially taken into account, 224 krulko, does not insist, 225 babenko, does not insist, 227 tymoshenko with colleagues have already spoken, 229 salamaha, does not insist, 230th bohdanets does not insist, 231 yefimov does not insist , 232- kunaev does not insist, 233 kunav, does not insist, 234 kunaiv does not insist, 235 the beekeeper does not insist, 236 the beekeeper does not insist, 237 the committee on education, science and innovation does not insist, 238 the groundhog does not insist

, 239 mother, does not insist with colleagues, 241 dubinsky does not insist, 242 bohdanets, does not insist, 243, aleksiychuk with colleagues does not insist, 244th frolov, pavlo does not... insists, 245 zadorzhnyi, does not insist, 246 shulyak, does not insist insists, 247, mykysha, insists, please, dmytro, thank you, 247 amendment, it is about the state fund for regional development, look, i propose to do with this amendment that part of the funds is 50% , in equal parts between the autonomous republic of crimea, regions and cities of kyiv, sevastopol, and 50% of the funds in additional equal parts between the regions , which suffered the most, let's say, destruction and in general the influence of the aggression of the russian federation, answered about these areas, i think that it is fair, and this is exactly how the state fund

for regional development should work, because we are talking about regions in this context, that's why this edit i believe, it should be adopted exactly in this version. i proposed, colleagues, please support and vote for this amendment, er, 247, mykysha, rejected by the committee, please vote for 26, the decision has not been made, 248 mykysha, please , please, please look, colleagues, very i ask you to pay attention to what exactly this amendment is about, this amendment is about the state fund for regional development, but about their regional commissions, come on, this is my third or fourth approach in the hall, so that we can finally destroy this corrupt link,

regional commissions, let's remove them already and in fact this fund will start working normally. determine exactly on a competitive basis honestly and fairly those projects that are really needed for regional development, and definitely not on the ground, definitely not in a manual mode and definitely not under certain obligations to the agreement and other other conditions, let's actually liquidate this corrupt link once and for all, and we will honestly determine the winners and really work effectively for regional development. colleagues, please support me finally, this amendment will be carried out by the regional commission of the russian federation. thank you, 248 mykysha, it

was rejected by the committee, please vote. for 42 no decision was made, let's move on, 249 committee on issues, committee on economic development rejected , does not insist, 250 yefimov with colleagues does not insist, 251 razumkov insists, please, dmytro oleksandrovychok jan. 251, 359, 375, 386, 403, 421, 433 and 444 are eight amendments, change me for 5 minutes, please, please, 5 minutes, thank you, dear colleagues, here in the hall there are again talks about that this is a forced step, that we do not have enough, this budget is a forced step, that we do not have enough money to provide

for the army, because our own revenues go exclusively to the defense security sector, and this is logical and correct, if not one big thing, but it is not true, why is it not true, you know about it, or you forgot to tell you about it at the factions, your leaders, but in this third - the expenses are laid again for the filming of the series, again in order to make programs for dobrokhrusk are included in this budget funds again for the ministry of foreign affairs, i would like to remind you all that two weeks ago you voted for 1.4 billion additional for the ministry of foreign affairs, after that the whole: the country saw a new, new

project, because i don't even know how name it, let's call it a project, it's copper fields, please tell me, this is really what the ministry of foreign affairs of a belligerent state should be doing, this is their key task, bees and honey, or international politics, or strategic building: partnerships, establishing relations with different states, ensuring the visits of the head of state, for example, the one that did not take place now in israel, this is just their miscalculations, this is their unprofessionalism, this is their failure, and you are again placing additional resources on them, you are placing money for additional financing of the nsdc, instead of to, for example, send it to the defense security sector. the nsdc, which spent money on the register of oligarchs, supposedly oligarchs who have now all left, said, we don't

need to fight with the register, with the oligarchs, the nsdc took such a position, malyuska, who was peeing his pants and talking about the fact that there is literally not a single minute in the 21st year that this process would not be started. now i would like to remind the minister of finance that we are in our 23rd year. two years have passed, there is no register of oligarchs, in fact we can talk about the fact that the leadership of the ministry of justice, like many other departments that were involved in this process, works for the oligarchs, instead of really carrying out the reforms that are directly shown to us our international partners, as well as mortgage expenses in this budget for absolutely unclear things, for example, our ideas that were proposed to allocate funds from the road fund exclusively to

the defense security sector, the profile committee did not support, the monomajority did not support, because they want to spray it again on large-scale construction, instead of directing it to directly the fund, 50% of which will go to 100% of this fund must be sent to the defense security sector in the armed forces, 50% of which will go to the provision of... and payment of salaries, bonuses, etc. to our defenders, and 50% to the purchase weapons, equipment, ammunition, because those who travel along the front know very well that the key question for every brigade, every commander, every soldier is give shells, give mines, and also of the soviet model, because, unfortunately, in two years we will have our own... . production was not fixed, and again i do not see an answer, and who is responsible for this, and no one, then they separate

the handles and send them to the ministry of foreign affairs in the capacity, as ambassadors, because they cannot find any other place in the state they can, and such examples, unfortunately a lot in this budget, that is, again we see good slogans, good slogans that we ... do everything for victory, everything for the front, everything for victory, but in fact for many it is a different front, the front in the east and the south is the same, and the front in kyiv is completely different, from which you can buy eggs for 17, summer jackets instead of winter, apples for 52, and the shells that are in poland, which do not come to us, these are the fronts we have, insist on voting for all of them? no corrections, thank you, let's move on, then, 252 krulko does not insist, 253 tymoshenko with colleagues have already acted, 254, committee on

legal policy, does not insist, 255, gerus. does not insist, 256 gerus, does not insist, 257 gerus, does not insist, 258 gerus does not insist, 259 gerus does not insist, 260th gerus does not insist, 261st gerus does not insist, 262 gerus does not insist, let's move on, 266, committee on issues of economic development, does not insist, 267, committee on issues of digital transformation, does not insist, 260. eighth demchenko, please, serhii. thank you, dear representatives of the ministry of finance. law on state the budget, as a legal act, has a special subject of regulation, different from other laws of ukraine. it concerns exclusively the establishment of state revenues and expenditures for general public needs. therefore, this law cannot make changes, stop the effect of the current laws of ukraine, and also

establish other additional legal regulation of relations, which is the subject. laws, you are trying, or the government is trying to violate the numerous decisions of the constitutional court on this matter, starting from 2007 until today, with a corresponding draft law, this also applies to the law on the judicial system, the status of judges, amendment 268 for your help, for help from my side and supported by the relevant specialized committee, so that you can consider it, so that you solve this problem, so that you do not violate the constitution, please , we are waiting for the second reading, taking into account this amendment, the draft, thank you, serhii, you insist, don’t insist, thank you, let’s move on, 269 , vasyl ivanovich mokan, doesn’t insist, 270th, yatsenko, doesn’t insist, 271 arishonkov, doesn’t insist, 272 , lyashenko, does not insist, 273,

tsabal does not insist, the 274th committee on the issue. the information officer does not insist, 276 yefimov does not insist, 277 trityakova does not insist, 270 oh, she is taken into account 278 zheliznyak , the railway does not insist, thank you, 279 magera does not insist, 280 mykisha, please, thank you, well, this correction, you can say zamenta, because he is talking about 30,000 military personnel. which are located in a 30-kilometer zone, because we understand that the 30-kilometer zone is close to hostilities, we understand that this is a real dangerous zone, in which there are both shelling and artillery, and rszv and others, but unfortunately, the majority of military personnel, let’s say, not a small part and do not even receive this 30k, but

they receive a bare salary, in some places, some additional, additional... payments, so this amendment just proposes to add 30k 000 hryvnias per month to military personnel located in a 30-kilometer zone from the contact line based on each day of stay in the relevant zone, i consider it fair for those servicemen of the state emergency service, policemen and others who are there, and therefore i ask all my colleagues to support the appropriate editing 280 amendment, 280 amendment mykysh by the exit committee i ask to vote for 30 decision not taken 281 hammer does not insist 282 tymoshenko and colleagues have already spoken 283 dubinsky does not insist 284

demchenko, please, serhiy. dear pa, ms. roxalano, i am turning to you, with a corresponding amendment, i propose to put to rest the issue of the corruption risk that the government lays down in this draft law for the 24th year, first of all, the government does not approach the various authorities equally, one by limiting the salary to the appropriate amount subsistence minimum, without limiting this amount of wages to others, the amendment primarily applies to bodies such as naz, nabu and the rest, why are they the ones that have priority over other workers in our country, why do they not have restrictions, which the government seems logical restrict all relevant workers in the relevant fields, please explain this, and for my part, i publicly declare that if the relevant provision is voted in the second reading, criminal proceedings will be registered against me