we summarize the informational morning in ukraine, on the air of the news, khrystyna parubiy works in the studio. the russians killed three residents of donetsk region, there are victims in avdiivka, vasyukivka and kalynivka. in addition, two residents of toretsk and a resident of the village of nytaylove were wounded, the regional military administration reported.

an infrastructural facility was damaged in the kurakhiv community. in turetsk, two houses were partially destroyed, and in the chasovoyarsk community, five houses, a multi-storey building and an industrial building were destroyed. the russians do not stop terrorizing kherson region. a 52-year-old man was injured as a result of the attacks. it was reported in the office of the prosecutor general of ukraine. during the day, the enemy shelled the region 73 times. 469 shells, including 46 in kherson. the enemy fired mortars, artillery, hail, tanks, aircraft and drones - added the head of the region oleksandr prokudin. residential blocks, a critical infrastructure object, an engineering structure, a utility company, an educational institution and a church were damaged. two people were injured due to enemy shelling in kharkiv oblast. injured 39-year-old woman, v

81-year-old man in the village for two years, oleg syniguv, the head of the region, said. during the day , the occupiers ransacked the settlements of chuguyiv and kupyan districts. two multi-apartment buildings, one private house, a kindergarten, a civil enterprise and an infrastructure object were damaged. meanwhile, medics are fighting for the lives of the two injured as a result. russian rocket at the terminal of the new post office in the village of korotych in the kharkiv region. the men are in extremely serious condition, connected to the apparatuses of shvidom in the regional military administration. five more wounded are in critical condition in intensive care. in total , 16 victims are still in the hospital. the new post has named the victims of saturday's attack. these are six men. the youngest was 21 years old, and the oldest - 31. we express our condolences

to the family. as a result of russian shelling , one of the thermal power plants of dtk was damaged, the equipment there was seriously damaged. as reported in the company's press service, the enemy struck the previous evening. there were no casualties. after the shelling stopped , the energy industry began to eliminate their consequences, the company did not say which one it is. destroyed all enemy targets. at night , the russians launched 14 drones and one kh-59 air missile over ukraine. shahedi the occupiers launched chauda from the crimean cape in the direction of the south-eastern and central regions of ukraine. rocket from temporarily occupied zaporozhye. it was shot down over dnipropetrovsk region. in addition, over the kyiv region, the defenders of the sky shot down an unidentified drone launched from the north. border russian missiles and

aerial bombs were aimed at residential buildings in kherson. sbu detained three informants, according to whose coordinates, in september, the occupiers destroyed two private residential buildings and damaged five more. then 10 people were seriously injured. all three are local. one of them served the occupiers during the occupation and involved two more traitors in the agent work. the russians ordered them to determine the coordinates of a compact housing development in kherson, as well as the base of the armed forces. now life imprisonment for all three. for what, for what do you understand the detainees? yes, for what, espionage. rum, espionage. to whom was the information given? to an acquaintance, on the left bank. where did they hit? russian missiles? transferred? transmitted, loud speaker. transmitted for what purpose was

the information transmitted? soviet union by the day of advertising workers, the defense forces of ukraine flawlessly advertised theirs. combat capability by colossal losses of the enemy. about nine hundred invaders were eliminated by our defenders in the last day. since the beginning of the full-scale russian invasion, 29,400 russian soldiers have become irrelevant content. 25 artillery systems, 22 combat systems will never be shown in propaganda videos again armored vehicles, 12 tanks and two enemy anti-aircraft vehicles. six drones were shot down in the sky. 15 units of automobiles and seven special vehicles of the enemy were burned. and according to operational information from the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, more than 90 combat clashes took place at the front during the past day. the enemy does not stop trying

to encircle avdiivka, but our military is on the defensive. the zsu repelled more than 20 russian attacks. the russians also tried to storm in the kupyansk, lymansk, marinsky, shakhtarsk and zaporizhia directions unsuccessfully meanwhile, the defense forces continue their offensive in the melitopol direction, exhausting the occupiers. our aviation made seven strikes on russian concentration areas, and missile forces destroyed four enemy artillery installations. the ukraine-eu intellectual property forum is currently taking place in kyiv. our correspondent dmytrodir will tell you more. is currently on the scene. dmitry, i congratulate you, why intellectual property is important, even in wartime, and what details of the work plan will be signed today. greetings christina, greetings to all our viewers.

we will certainly find an answer to these questions today together with my guest, but i want to say right away that representatives, authors, er, intellectual property, as well as our partners from various countries, in particular from lithuania, latvia, estonia, have gathered in kyiv today , and from poland and also representatives of the european office of intellectual property, and today , indeed, a two-year contract will be signed between ukraine and the european office, we will ask olena orlyuk, director of the state organization, about this and about intellectual property ukrainian national office of intellectual property and other ms. olena, i congratulate you, please tell me why intellectual property during war, it is also, maybe even a weapon, and whether there are any legislative obstacles in ukraine, congratulations, of course, during war

intellectual property is no less important than any other direction, and our business, as ukraine and in this case as a national body of intellectual property, is to create all... working tools, create high-quality services, improve the quality of expertise and convey to society, why it is intellectual property that we have right now, regardless of the conditions of war , to protect and protect as much as possible, because ukraine must prepare for how it will be restored and ukraine must create all the conditions for business to receive as much as possible favorable conditions from the national government and from the international community, we have, entering the european and world markets, we have to popularize today and be able to protect our interests. unfortunately, ukraine is fighting very hard today with blood, the right to independence, its

development, its future. intellectual property is an opportunity to realize yourself both now during the war and later , we are a well-known worldwide brand and it is easier for our authors, our innovators, our creators, our small and medium-sized enterprises, today, our businesses in general, they have become recognizable, now we have to saturate them with the quality of what they come out with, with what product, and most importantly, we have them here to protect their intellectual capital by entering those markets, which is why it is so important in a war. the two-year agreement, which stipulates how much money will be allocated and to whom it is directed, where these funds will go, to which creators, intellectual property or representatives, and this two-year plan will be signed today, we had a memorandum of cooperation signed in geneva in the summer

between us as the national intellectual property body of ukraine and the european intellectual property office, memorandum of cooperation, pro mutual understanding, about support, and today this is just one of the already working steps , this is the signing of a specific work plan, in this case for the first two years, it will be extended, within the framework of this plan, specific steps are defined to support not just the sector as such or for example of our assistance office for its expert activities on quality improvement, but it is also a question of improving the quality of rights protection, and the most important thing is an opportunity, and today it was already said about it, these are european funds that allow our, first of all, small and medium-sized businesses , our authors, creators, innovators, to receive financial support for compensation in the european markets, when they... they go there, registering intellectual property in europe, and this is extremely important, because it is quite

a costly procedure there, but it is an opportunity to protect their intellectual property as ukrainian. thank you, madam, this was ms. olena orliuk, director of the state organization ukrainian national office of intellectual property and innovation, i would like to note that that within the framework of this contract , 4 million euros will be allocated from the european office. at the moment, i have such information, christina, i am passing the ether to you. thank you dmitry, it was our correspondent dmitry didora from the capital, he told about the details of the form of intellectual property ukraine eu, which is currently happening in kyiv. and on this i say goodbye to you, see you tomorrow. greetings, dear tv viewers, on the air of the tv channel, the program studio zahid,

we will analyze the most important events of this week, this applies to the situation in the immediate in the east, as well as on the russian-ukrainian front. our guests today are retired british army colonel glen grant and polish politician and activist, myroslav cech. our first guest is retired british army colonel glen grant, a military expert. glory to ukraine, dear mr. colonel, god save the king. well, it feels like we are on the verge of the third world war. in particular, it is about the colossal revival in the middle east, the united states of america, for the reinforcement of two aircraft carrier groups, directed an additional flagship from italy, so we understand that everything is on the verge, so to speak. objectively speaking, this is far from the threshold of the third world war. in general, it all boils down to the second cold war. there's a lot going on in the world, but these

are just proxy battles, like those during the cold war, when people were fighting, for example, in africa and other places. i do not observe that russia is going or preparing to fight with nato. they probably understand that it would be a mistake. so at the moment there is only the two things that could lead us to world war iii are an attack on nato, or a chinese attack on taiwan. the situation in the middle east can remain autonomous, of course if iran has a nuclear bomb and decides to use it, that will change everything, using nuclear weapons would certainly change everything, but at the moment i just don't see that prospect. so we will see a continuation of the battle between russia and ukraine, as well as between israel and hamas and possibly even hezbollah. however, i do not think that geographical military expansion is possible now. fair. and china is not ready for this, we understand that war is not only about fighting

, war is about resources, and on the one hand, we have a certain fear that part of the resources that should support us can be directed to strengthening, for example, american allies in the middle east, is one point, on the other hand, we understand that the western structure, the western defense system, is moving into full swing, because it is really not only about russian aggression against ukraine, but about about a possible great war, and, accordingly, the western ones countries will no longer be able to pretend that nothing is happening and help ukraine with, i don’t know, a couple of leopards, that is, the western world must join in, otherwise it can simply be destroyed by one or another warhead that will fly, for example, from iran, for example, those or other arab militants can start something, and a chain reaction will begin. regarding the first point, i do not think that what is allocated to israel reduces the amount of funds allocated

to ukraine, this will never happen at all, most likely there will be different packages, different arms groups and everything else, because ukraine is not ready for what israel needs now, and vice versa, israel does not need much of what ukraine is asking for, so such conclusions should not be drawn, as for the readiness of the intervention, it worries me , because i still think that they have not accepted the full seriousness of this war, instead they act as if the war is over there somewhere and will not reach them. if the theater of war changes, then for certain countries ... including great britain, it will be an unexpected blow, because in my belief that most european countries have not properly assimilated the lessons learned, they view these lessons through their own cultural lens. we forget that it will not work to oppose russia and at the same time do business with it. the west is not as ready as it should be

. now the situation is improving somewhat, but there is still a lot of work to be done. many countries. such as romania, the czech republic, the baltic states, provided ukraine with a huge amount of equipment, and in the case of latvia, it transferred all its air defense equipment and almost all anti-tank missiles, still waiting for them to be replenished, so we can only hope that nothing on this front happens quickly, since the west needs time to replenish its stockpile in case russia really decides to expand the geography... etekems, they did an extremely good job . the key story is that the united states finally dared to hand them over. we understand that this decision has been on president joseph biden's desk for an extremely long time. and finally, two dozen etekoms are far from the first model, it is better than nothing, but we

we understand that it is necessary to strengthen the supply of atakams. well, accordingly, your prospects and in general, how do you evaluate etekms in order to, for example, break through the front line, and before that destroy russian logistics in the south. firstly, i'm not sure exactly which models of atakams were shipped, there are about five different models and it looks like the older ones were actually shipped . why such a small number? because this is the amount that can be placed on board several planes instead of shipping them by sea, which would take longer. this is mine assumption. in terms of quantity, that is, if it was possible to quickly provide 20 missiles, it will be possible , if necessary, to quickly provide another 20, and perhaps even more modern ones. the us has an interest in not depleting its own stockpile, because atakam is a key weapon in the us arsenal, and they don't want to waste it. as for combat, the danger with attacks is

that they are long-range weapons, and when you fire them, you're just like... shooting targets that are far away. is it possible to break through with such a weapon? front? the answer is no, will it help to weaken the front? yes, but there is a danger that if there is too much of a time delay between the atakams attack and something on the front changing in our favor, it will give russia time to reel from what the atakams have done, to pull up more reserves and ammunition. that is, it's about tactics, a lot of fire, a lot of maneuvering, you have to shoot and act on the front line at the same time to create a complex, synchronized attack, if you just launch atakams but do nothing on the front line, russia will have time to figure it out with what happened and return to previous positions. of course,

it will definitely not be easier for them from these rivers. the russians won't get too close because ukraine will find these and neutralize them, they will have to think about how to act differently, so in the next few weeks putin's generals will be scratching their heads on how to counter the attacks so as not to lose much needed key resources . the first was great britain, yes stormshado, later there were french scalps, then the united states with atakams, well, accordingly, we are waiting for german tauruses, but still we feel a certain dosage, we understand that long-range missile systems are very good, but this may not be enough to make a qualitative change in the south, the situation is extremely difficult, we are entering winter, we should not forget that only the infantry can occupy and hold positions, you can strike in the rear, but this will not change the position of the front line, unless you manage to destroy

so much ammunition that the enemy will simply have nothing to fight on the front line, the ukrainian planned... are also now standing before the challenge, they need to make sure that they can really use the artillery they have in a targeted way to help the soldiers in the brigades, because the most important thing is to enable the brigades to keep moving forward and defend better. it is clear that russia is not going to stop, instead it will attract even more people, even more ammunition and weapons. even if her weapons, her tanks, are old. they still shoot, that should not be forgotten, i think we missed an opportunity, or a moment when russia could to break, now they stubbornly stand their ground, and nothing. there is no choice but to defeat them. but frankly, it is now extremely important for ukraine to stop relying only on resources from abroad, and

start spending much more time and energy on creating its own weapons and its own systems, because if this war goes from winter to summer, getting equipment from the west it will be harder and harder. ukraine must find ways of quick compensation, there are such systems. which ukraine could produce, for example, mortars, mortars are created quite quickly, as well as ammunition for them, if each battalion has six mortars , like in the uk for example, this will be fundamental for ukraine, the military must think in a new way, what i see now is still old military thinking, people need new thinking about how to act and use available resources, you can't just rely on civil society buying drones, that's not how to win a war, so new thinking is needed, and i'm afraid that the current personnel will not be able to find him.

dear mr. colonel, you were one of the first to boldly and clearly say, yes, that the russians are preparing for a so-called long, protracted war, this was at a time when very many military experts were talking about a short war there for several months, so there were a number of factors that... demonstrated that the russians are preparing for a protracted campaign, if you take the current phase, the current moment and the current available resources, i think that in the west they calculated the plus or minus level of the coefficient of the russian yes the so-called defense, which will be the russian vision of offensive actions, or maybe the so-called active defense , which putin said, they just continue to do what they are doing, because in their minds ... they are winning, russians are used to not feeling sorry for people and losing a lot of equipment, and a great example of this was the second world war, in which their losses were colossal, and it seems that

russia has no desire to stop the war. the russians now support putin like never before, and putin is putting his all into this war energy and russian resources, despite their weak intellectual technological power, they will continue to make a lot of low-quality things that will make life difficult for ukraine, and this is about numbers, that's the power that russia has, so if we don't break them in the winter, then there is a possibility that the war may continue for another two or three years, and i am quite serious about this, russia must be broken, but now we are not doing it, we are only holding them back. yes, there is some progress, but it is not a breakthrough, we need a breakthrough, maybe it will happen near kherson with a new operation to ford the river. that is, we need to act somewhere else, act differently, because strategy is about capabilities, at the moment our capabilities are not strong enough to

make the strategy work, even with atakams, even with f-16, because the main capability is a hundred combat brigades , which today are not adequately equipped to win this war, so it is necessary to think more and better, in your opinion, putin already has, i don't know, a sense of purpose. of this war, yes, when he proclaimed an absolutely false so-called special military operation . existential war against ukraine, so we see a number of, so to speak, propaganda clichés, which indicate that this war is real, well, their goal is to turn the aggression of the russian army against ukraine into a war of the entire russian people, that is, they would

like it to become the so-called third world war for russia, some kind of new great patriotic war. you are right, however, i think that putin understands that without ukrainian resources, he cannot wage an existential war against nato, he needs ukraine. its preparatory human resources that would fight for russia, this is what he is aiming at, he has already attracted many ukrainians from crimea and kherson who are fighting on the other side of the demarcation line, this must not be forgotten, it is to be mentally ready, and returning to existential war, putin can really lose it only in ukraine, and that is why ukraine should take this very seriously, because something may happen that will definitely not be in favor of the implementation of the strategy of the ukrainian military command. dear glen, has the concept or vision of war in

our key allied capitals changed now ? time, well, there was a feeling that our friends would like to localize the war, and therefore they were not in too much of a hurry to allocate important long-range and powerful resources, now there is a question of aviation and so on, well, the question is not only about the quality of those resources, but also about the quantity, well, what kind of formula for waging war and possibly reaching one or another end to the war do our friends in the pentagon, in london and possibly in berlin see now. there are a number of important things: firstly, you must understand that any formula must be based on trust, if it is not based on trust, then nothing good will definitely come out, no formula will work, this trust is built by what was provided to ukraine and what was properly used. the important question is whether ukraine is fighting corruption or whether it is fighting in the legal field, because this is what trust is based on. access

to nato is entirely contingent. from political compatibility. in certain aspects, ukraine has military compatibility, but in other aspects, such as logistics, compatibility as such is absent at all. the fact that you have to take all your equipment to other countries to repair it suggests that there is something wrong with the logistics system. so, the situation with military compatibility is more or less, but political compatibility extremely weak. ukrainian ambassadors are weak, by the looks of it, except for the ambassador to the united states, and so you can't build relationships that ultimately lead to a proper understanding of what to do to help ukraine. so trust is above all, and until it is strong and 100 percent, there will always be a lack of confidence in what to do next to support the country. it's like a boy's mind, i'm telling everything here, it's important to understand that this is the main problem of ukraine. there is no point in just constantly asking for something.

you have to create a relationship that is built on as a real relationship that will be strong and last for years. currently, in many aspects, this is unfortunately not done. we already have a few weeks as the new minister of defense, we are talking about rustem umerov, we understand that there are many challenges, i do not know, this is about a thorough study of what the previous minister of defense did, what he did not do, but in any case, we understand , that there are states allied to us, yes, that regularly send signals, and if you try to generalize like that, what are they talking about now the ministers of defense or the chiefs of general staffs, allied states, i don’t know, the united states, britain, france, poland and so on, with the new composition of the ministry of defense, what strategy do they propose and how quickly can it be implemented, in particular, it is about logistics, ensuring ukrainian production within our state and beyond its borders, and in general, whether

any, i don't know, comprehensive advice is given on how to strengthen our defense industry. i am 100% sure that everything they are talking about is everything we are talking about you spoke in all our interviews. i don't think anything will change, because structural things will always remain structural things, and logistics will always be logistics. logistics must be designed and created, and people must be trained. they're definitely going to talk about improving training, and that the structures and the combat structures... need to be updated as well, that's all something that everybody understands, that's what they're doing in all the other countries, so of course, for the new secretary of defense, that's going to be something new, but definitely not for the system, without a doubt, useful gives a lot of advice, and coming back to trust, i will also add that unfortunately there are no american or british generals who are really close to the system, although this is only within the limits of what i know, ukraine does not use the potential of everyone.