conflict zones will expand just like there in the middle east, then everyone understood that more ammunition needs to be made. even when i was at the munich conference last year, in february, the leaders of the country, scholz and macron, spoke, and their main point was that they would uh, develop their defense about the defense-industrial complex, they admitted that that it is in decline, especially production. supplies and they called, in order to reach normal volumes, it takes several years for them to establish a normal amount of ammunition, and they are calculating normally, judging by the intensity of what is happening now in our country and approximately calculating the time that may be there in the conflict with the russian federation, well, we are saying, let’s say, yes , one part is, ammunition, but the biggest problem is and and and

here, i think, and in other countries that do it, it is gunpowder , but the problem with gunpowder is real all over the world, it is produced by china and several other countries, and there is no such mass production of gunpowder, once again, because it is few people waged wars, and those enterprises that did, they went to us decline, and in the same way in many other countries it was easier to buy there in the same china or even... because no one expected a war and a lot of this production was lost, so gunpowder is the main material now, which is very necessary, because even there, during the manufacture of shells, you can pour out the shell itself, it is possible to do it, the detonator is difficult, but we can also do it, fill it, make explosives, well, looking at what, yes , tamil is easier, hexogen is more difficult, but you can find it, by the way prices on hexane too

took off, they used to be there for a few dollars, now they are there, i won’t say, tens of dollars, hexagen costs more than 50 , and it is constantly growing, because the market economy is growing, demand for it is growing and prices are rising, so you can pour something in there, but in order for the projectile to fly, gunpowder is needed, and each projectile needs a separate one, and with this, the problem in the world is with gunpowder, so i told you almost the whole link, now returning to ukraine, the same problems as everywhere, no the problem is to pour some hulls, er, somewhere something can be done there, i won’t tell much there either, eh, but we have fixed something, we have private companies that have mastered the production of some projectiles, and this all continues, of course, it requires different conditions, not like european ones, we understand that

all these enterprises can be under the sights of the russian federation, other conditions for their creation, other conditions for their security need to be changed and we need to make sure that they are not, you know, there are factories that are surrounded by barbed wire, there were none yesterday, and today the towers stand as it is written in some documents, everything needs to be changed, it needs to be opened, it needs to be simplified and then the production will be improved, but there are many problems, we are trying to solve them now, so it is already in the stage of war. colonel, why am i asking about weapons? so with the axis of evil, notional, china , iran and russia, a bipartisan commission of the united states of america congress says that the united states of america may enter such a zone of turbulence in relations with russia and china, between the 27th year, the 35th year, and what can be problematic, what can lead

to the military conflict between these states, i to the fact that, considering the fact that the world was not ready for such a hot war of russia against ukraine, well, at the same time, the war of hamas against israel began, and obviously there will also be some kind of continuation, and not only with hamas, but also with neighboring countries that support hamas and palestine. well, given the prospects of what the americans are describing , they are talking about the fact that there could be a global war, or a bigger war, does this mean that we are entering the era of another arms race, because when there was a soviet union, this arms race was big enough, the stocks that the russian federation is using now, including those that were accumulated by the soviet union, these tanks were standing somewhere beyond the urals, and this equipment... just under

by trucks and then they transported here, is such an explosion of the military-industrial complex of the world possible, given all these threats, and what will be the result? that the world will receive, from my point of view unequivocally, i am sure that the next 50 years, even if the war in our ukraine will end there, i don't know, in a short period of time, so this, these scars from this war will force all other countries to treat their defense and industrial complexes, their army less lightly, and i am sure that i will already ... spoke about this, that there will be something like an arms race and a cold war, because even if you are right, we now see what kind of geopolitical processes are taking place in our country, the middle east, china, which is claiming e- er, regional leader in central asia, er,

when uh, he has territorial claims to taiwan, north korea, the russian federation, uh, japan is already there , south korea is already there, yes, different worlds, different political, movements that are there, management countries, then of course all this is, and even if it does not catch fire , if there is no war, then all the same, these shams from the ukrainian war will make everyone continue to accumulate weapons and understand that this is how ukraine found itself in a situation where it is alone, alone with the enemy and only after a few months countries began to help her, all of them must understand, and here is the question, will they start helping or not, you see, already the conclusions that the united states has sent its aircraft carriers to the mediterranean sea to support israel, they already understand that sometimes it is more important to come and help

immediately, or and show other countries that it is not necessary to attack this or that country, that they will defend it. it was different with us, russia entered, we fought almost alone for about three months, yes, there were some infantry weapons that were handed over to us, and the first self-propelled artillery arrived somewhere, i remember in may there three or seven, the haimarts were probably there at the end of the summer or inside, who really helped us with something, they started some kind of armament there, so of course, i am sure that the nearest 50 years, maybe i am exaggerating, but i take 50 years somewhere , as it was after the second world war, and there will be an arms race, there will be new weapons , the practice of using troops will be constantly studied, there will be some, i think, new alliances will unite based on regional interests, which will plan their defense and their lives together near the russian federation in that

sea, i said a long time ago that we need there, if we are talking about the black sea , coverage of the surface situation, which completely covered everything from turkey, bulgaria , romania, all the way to ukraine, so that it would be one, a belt that would help us underwater and surface and air conditions that could respond to the actions of the russian federation, then i think that on this principle it is possible that new alliances will be formed, in particular to protect their interests, in specific regions, in addition to those alliances that already exist now, i sure that we already remember many times, france , trying to present itself as the leader of europe, announced the creation of: a european army , yes, there is nato, but they understand that the main player in nato is the united states after all, the main player, which has the main power, and if you remove the united states from here, then nato will become much weaker, and world

leaders understand this, including britain and france and germany, who want to have a key role in europe, in order to influence regionally and influence geopolitics , they believe that they need an army of their own, a european one, and it is not excluded that it will be created, because the threats from the russian federation and other countries are great, and i think this is due to the fact that there will be other unions, maybe there will be a complete review of the security format, the security format, as it was after the second world war, maybe after all these processes that are happening now, it will also be reviewed, there will be some global alliances and there will be some regional ones. unions that will provide each other's safety. mr. colonel, i also want to ask you about the information that appeared in the german publication bild, they write about the fact that the russians tried to modify the soyuz rocket, which goes into earth orbit, and

according to the version of german journalists, pain is enough a respected publication that tells this story that the russians wanted to fill it with explosives... this, this missile is carried by the soyuz and launched somewhere in plesetsk there near arkhangelsk and so that this missile does not go into orbit and fall somewhere... in ukraine and preferably somewhere in the district of kyiv and this conversation, in which it is discussed, the conversation of the former head of roscosmos, dmytro ragozin, and the current head of the roscosmos subsidiary, the progress rocket space center , dmytro baranov, also bid publishes that they were preparing such a provocation, and it was in january 23 year they reported to putin. they said that we can launch such and such a blank, loaded with this and that explosive,

although all the engineers said that it might explode somewhere, this rocket is not over ukraine, over russia, because it will not be able to withstand this flight and the speed of the flight, how likely it is that the russians will use it, and the rockets of this rocket are the carrier of the soyuz in order to hit ukraine. the russians can invent anything, it's absolutely obvious, how likely is the threat that they will do it, you know, i'm not a specialist in just such missiles, just space ones, well, and about that other missiles right there tth, their use, yes with from a military point of view, namely, about the possibility of such a possibility, whether it can or not it is not possible, as i understand it, such a missile... it can only be launched along a ballistic trajectory, and you also need to understand what its

composition is, what it is made of, what features it has, uh, withstand overloads, what it goes up there, for example, under the engine, but when it goes ballistically down, then we understand that the overloads there simply under its own weight can be much different, then we need to ask people who are directly involved in rocket engineering, er, horbulin, korosel, ours, let's say... so meters of rocketry, so uh, if she is capable of it, then everyone is there calculations allow, then yes, i can assume that the russians can do it, if they have more of them, then just use them as a normal ballistic missile, in order to deliver the warhead to that other part of ukraine, they can, but again i say, you need to look at the technical characteristics and ask specialists to what extent the tactical and technical characteristics themselves will allow it to be done. thank you, colonel, it was roman

kostenko, people's deputy of ukraine, colonel of the sbu. friends, we are live telekanaluso, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, please like this video so that it is trending on youtube, and subscribe to our pages. in addition, we conduct a survey on youtube, we ask you about this, whether it is necessary. for ukraine to negotiate with russia on peace, yes, no, or your option, please write in the comments under this video, then we will contact a political scientist, chairman of the board of the center of applied political of penta studies, volodymyr fisenko. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you, i am glad to see you on our air. i am also glad to see you, congratulations. let's start with zilon's mask, because today he said that the integrity of ukraine must be sacrificed to avoid it. world war, on his platform x

, he wrote that we need to find peace in ukraine, i think we need to restore normal relations with russia, and if we want to restore normal relations with russia, we have to understand that russia came to ukraine and obviously she will not leave there, well from those territories that are already occupied by the russian federation, musk repeatedly says this and it would be possible to ignore it in order not to understand the influence of musk on the world and on what he says, maybe crazy things, he says, but he does not say these by chance crazy things, and it is clear that in the conditions when russia is constantly trying to push ukraine to peace talks, musk plays along in this situation every time, but let's make peace with russia, the united states of america, because in principle we must make peace, because they will with the chinese, with iran, they will. to create a new axis of evil. how do you feel about these

proposals of musk and what are they connected with, that is, there must be some logic in everything? no, well, there is logic here, and it is simple enough that as for the proposals themselves, well, unfortunately, man, although he is a well-known revolutionary in the latest technologies, is still a man. probably does not know history, at one time they were definitely going to appease hitler, and what happened when they make concessions to aggressive dictators, to people... who create a new empire, concessions do not work, on the contrary, they only tempt aggressor, they only push him to new aggressive actions, he took over one country or a part of the country, they made concessions to him, as in his time with hitler in relation to the czech republic, he went further, yes, and in the end everything came to

the second world war , because they began to make concessions to hitler and therefore musk probably does not know history, but why does he say that? because there are such sentiments both in the usa and in the west, in many countries of the world, somewhere these are pro-russian sentiments, that it is better not to quarrel with russia, it is better to come to an agreement with russia, surrounded by mask and a lot has already been written and spoken about this, it seems that there are people connected with russia who influence musk's thoughts, his worldview, and his attitude to the crimean problem there. in general, now to ukraine, but in addition, these are banal concerns , this is, i would say, pacifist opportunism, musk, as many people are afraid of war, and he thinks, let's better negotiate, let's make concessions, yes, and that's it , there will be no war then, unfortunately it does not work, this method does not work, so

in this case it is a vivid illustration of how a person who is a revolutionary in modern technologies is an absolute ignoramus in politics and history, today the speaker of the czech parliament, marketta pekarova adamova, who spoke at the second parliamentary summit of the crimean platform held in prague, said that the world needs to respond to the crimes of russia , let's hear what she said. the illegal annexation of crimea in 2014 was the first direct and deliberate use of military force by one state to seize the territory of another state since the collapse of the soviet empire, and lack of an adequate reaction to this by the international community, including our countries, was perceived in the kremlin as a sign of our weakness, a weakness that aggressors always

perceive as an invitation to attack. mr. volodymyr, madam speaker, the czech parliament is right about 2014, but why, why didn't the world see putin in 2008, when he attacked georgia, because this is also a question, why didn't they react in the 14th, and why didn't they react in the eighth year, well listen, if they didn't react in the 14th, no reacted to the seizure of crimea, that was a real mistake, that's exactly what we heard. this is precisely the evidence of the learned lessons of history, well, because this bitter experience of the czech republic itself and the understanding of precisely those mistakes that were made in the 14th year, it is good that many western politicians both in europe and in the usa have learned these lessons, in the eighth year, i think, there was no understanding at all

, no feeling, awareness that putin is already different, putin already wants revenge, putin... already wants to change the world order, maybe 2008 is the year it was just a rehearsal for putin , an attempt to show his muscles, to demonstrate his muscles, to demonstrate his strength to the west, the fact that the west went so quickly to negotiate, well, maybe it convinced putin, okay, so you can act like that, by the way , then in ukraine, just recently, well, two months ago, it was so sad , the 15th anniversary of russia's attack on georgia, and someone remembered what we wrote, then i remembered an article by oleksandr sushko, our colleague, who is now the head of the revival fund , he wrote that russia's war against georgia is a warning, the next one it could be ukraine and crimea, in particular , unfortunately, that's what happened, that's why at least

some people in ukraine had such an understanding, but not everyone, and we were all afraid. and let's put it this way, they didn't want to believe in russia's war against ukraine, i remember, even in march 14, when crimea was already seized, the people i talked to, simple people, said, i never thought that i would live until the war with russia, they did not believe in it, and in the west they did not believe in it, but here is the fact that they reacted very mildly, inadequately, mildly to the russian aggression and to the seizure of crimea and to the hybrid war. of russia against ukraine. this was a huge mistake, which eventually led to a direct full-scale attack by russia on ukraine. and by the way, now, i think that the lesson and now events are on. israel and the attack by hamas, there is already an opinion, well, it can be considered conspiratorial, but i think that it is necessary to carefully monitor

the situation, whether russia has started a hybrid war, not only against ukraine, but a direct war is already going on in full scale against us, but didn't russia start a hybrid war against the west, provoking such chaos in international affairs relations, a chain, a chain reaction...' of various regional conflicts , in order to divert attention from ukraine and in order to drag the west into a whole series of such conflict situations, again so that putin, so-called, resolved his questions on ukraine, the leader of the republicans in the united states senate, mitch mcconnell, a rather influential political figure on the chessboard of american politics, says that china, russia and iran are the new axis of evil in the world. yesterday i spoke with the diplomat valery chaly, he talks about as for mcconnell, it does not seem at all that he would express himself in such a way, because

he is quite a cautious and quite balanced politician, and i have never heard that at such a level people say that china is entering the axis of evil, well, in particular, china, with russia and iran. eh, in the united states of america they are increasingly talking about the fact that china and russia... threaten the united states of america, they make predictions that in 27-35 there will be such a threat, when they will have to use weapons against both russia and china, well, in a certain period, let's see if putin has one support in the world in order to finally form this axis of evil and everyone understood that there is a duel, among other things, between civilization, countries of civilizations and countries of an authoritarian regime, well, i don't know, an authoritarian way of ruling, well, what is

ideological contradictions, there is such an ideological rift, that is a fact, yes, but i believe that this is the definition that there is an axis of evil together with china, this is a certain simplification, that there is an axis of evil, and that with nuances, from evil, which includes russia, north korea, iran, yes, yes. unfortunately, this is a fact, this message of evil is already working, but there too there is no direct military alliance, there is mutual assistance with weapons, there is an exchange of information, the main thing is that they exchange weapons with each other, and there is also a danger in this, although, for example, even iran does not vote together with russia in the un, because there are certain contradictions between by them, i am not talking about china anymore, china did not recognize the annexation of crimea, did not recognize the annexation ... of the territory north korea recognized all this, but china did not, china is a little old, but what is the problem, international

relations are perceived in china now, in particular and the war between russia and ukraine, in light of its confrontation with in the united states, and in the states, the situation is similar, almost a mirror image, they too now perceive the picture of international relations, various conflicts, because of their confrontation with china, this is especially evident among the republicans, and this trend is intensifying, and i agree with valery chal, that indeed, even such fairly moderate, american politicians are also beginning to look at china as the main threat, not russia, but china in particular, for it the main threat, and that the risk of a direct collision in the future is, unfortunately, yes, such there is a risk, on the other hand, as long as china is ready to negotiate, it wants to be, it seems to me, such a competitor for the united states, an alternative center of influence, as the soviet union once was, for the west, for the united states, and

now sidzimpina's china is claiming the same role, however, they are ready to agree at least on some issues, but now the issue of xi jinping's visit to the usa is being discussed, let's see how it will go on, you know, not the accent. attention is now on the fact that there is already an army of evil, and that it is necessary to resist china, well, there is no need to fake a potential risk, which may appear in the future anyway, it is better to gradually neutralize it, this is not the same situation as with russia, china has not yet taken direct aggressive steps, well, there is a risk in taiwan, but so far, china has avoided such actions as russia did, so it is necessary to restrain. from such actions. would it be better for them to engage in abstract peacemaking projects than to act like russia or become a direct military ally

of russia? mr. volodymyr. by the way, in china, they fired the minister of defense li shang fu, who was very close to the russian federation in terms of his views and friendship with putin , seven weeks ago he disappeared, and the western media reported that he was under investigation, and in mid-september the financial times wrote that lip was relieved of his duties of the head of the ministry of defense of the people's republic of china and talked about the fact that he is connected with the corrupt chinese defense system, the reasons for lee's dismissal are not mentioned, they are unlikely to be voiced in view of the closedness of the chinese regime, but can this, relatively speaking, the head of li shangfu be a prelude to xi jinping meeting with joe biden? no, no, i think that it is not related in any way, not related in any way to us relations, by

the way. before that, according to a similar scheme, the minister of foreign affairs of china was removed , and now the old new minister, who previously held this position, now manages the foreign policy of wang and the chinese communist party, and now the foreign ministry headed the chinese, no, it is not related, it is rather an internal showdown and such a specific, i would say personnel political technology of the chinese leadership, when it is first cleaned a person, it is not known what, where, why was removed. and then there is an official decision, no, i think that china will not make any gifts to the states, they will, on the contrary, behave so harshly, demand, negotiate, even some concessions from the us, they are now showing strength, they are gradually building infrastructure

. on the side of the usa, but we shouldn't quarrel with china either, we don't need new enemies , let there be a better distance between china and russia, but for the americans, here's what you already said, you have to think about if there are threats, risks both on the part of china and on the part of russia, and they have this understanding, let them increase military production, in particular, in order to help us replenish our arsenals, the arsenals of the allies, i think there is an urgent need for this, it will simply be a deterrent tool , not necessarily that it will all shoot and fight, but it will be weighty a tool for deterring potential aggressors, thank you, mr. volodymyr, for the conversation, it was volodymyr fissenko, political scientist, chairman of the board of the center for applied political

research, pent. friends, we are working live on tv channel uso, as well as on our youtube and facebook platforms , the voting is now ending on youtube, we ask you the following, does ukraine need peace talks with russia, no, 87% of viewers who are watching now us on youtube, 13% answered that way. friends, please like this video, subscribe to ours pages on youtube and on facebook, and also join our pages on social networks, we are everywhere, and read our news on the website espresso tv, we work for you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. in the next program, i will have a veteran of the russian-ukrainian war yevhen dyky and general krivonos, don't miss it, it will be very interesting. i'm putting an end to this, i wish you all good health, take care of yourself and your relatives, goodbye.

the militants of the hamas group released two more hostages, they were captured during the attack on israel on october 7, what they survived, what is the fate of the other 200 hostages, we are talking about this on bbc news ukraine, live from london, i am yevgenia shedlovska. one of the freed women said: hamas militants kept them in underground tunnels in the gaza strip, she says they were beaten during the abduction, but then they were treated humanely in captivity. she was taken through plowed fields on a motorcycle, one sat in front, the other behind, and when they caught her, they beat her with sticks.