[000:00:00;00] well let's say something could be resolved regarding trade between countries, some of the practices that china is using that joe biden could agree not to use, trade, i mean trade, there could be a question about what china is doing , which actually engages in industrial espionage, that is, he steals american technology and so on, but i do not think that there can be any agreements regarding the global world, i would, you know, compare it to the negotiations that the leaders of the united states had with the leaders of the soviet union, and eisenhower met with the khrushchevs, kennedy met with the khrushchevs, nixon with brezhnev several times, ford met with brezhnev, and

most of the time. about avoiding a direct confrontation, but at the same time the side remained with its, all its aspirations, and let's say, nixon came to the soviet union in 72-74, brezhnev to the united states in 73, and this did not interfere the soviet union to carry out its expansion, say, when portugal, a revolution took place in portugal and portugal provided independence. their african colonies were all called the soviet union to install pro-soviet de facto communist regimes in angola in mozambique, this did not prevent the soviet union in 1975 from inciting north vietnam to conquer south vietnam and actually take part in it, well and this did not prevent the soviet union from striving, when the revolution took place in portugal, to establish a communist government there, and

such a one... that is, i think that china, it will behave approximately as it did then the soviet union behaved, but it is better to meet than not to meet, because it is better to talk than not to talk, at the same time , you have to remember that joe biden met putin in june 2021, and that did not stop putin from doing what he is doing , that is, i would be very cautious, and i have some global optimism about this future. the bidens do not have a meeting, well, why am i asking, because right now in ukrainian society there are huge expectations, here is putin, biden will meet with xi jinping and they will both tell putin to stop the war, and he he will immediately get scared and stop, well, if xi jinping has already said, then that's it, i think he won't say first, you know, the war may interfere with xi jinping at some point, such a moment may come if

the western economy is weaker. much weaker than it is, because china, unlike the soviet union at that time , is interested in the western economy, from different points of view, because the west as a whole is the biggest market for china, ah, china is interested in western technology, that is, he has an economic interest in the event, which the soviet union did not have at that time, but i do not think that china has reached such a point that now sizpin will say to biden that, well, yes, i, i will talk to putin about the fact that he stopped the war, i i think that this will definitely not happen now, well, we have said many times in this program , including that, in principle, the event has led to a situation where china's economy can afford such freedom of politics, this country in world, and it turns out that,

based on your thesis, before this meeting there will be socio-economic issues, the event and in the future, continues to strengthen china, economically, china is interested in this, right, well, in fact, because the west imports many things from china, but the west itself created such a situation, because it was a huge mistake of the west, that the west after death bit by bit gradually step by step, especially when denziopin took over power in china and he actually allowed china to develop a market economy, the west just moved a lot of production to china, i'm not me i think, even in your program somehow provided data, this absolutely it is disgusting that almost a third, the most important component used for the manufacture of various medicines in the whole world, is manufactured in china, well , look at that, this event itself created such a situation,

and it is impossible to get out of this situation in a year, not in two will succeed, because it was created, not a year, not two, it was created significantly, significantly for a much longer time, and therefore the event depends on the way it is. although china is dependent on the western economy, i do not expect any principled agreements at the biden meeting sidzimpino, except for some purely economic agreements, there will be no political agreements, because they have completely opposite goals, the west is a democratic world, china is an autocratic world, and china wants, wants to be, at least not on the side, when careful. let's say he had talks with nixon and ford, that is, they will talk about something, they, but i think that there will be no such political global agreements, that china will somehow contribute to the fact that now putin

stops the war, this will definitely not happen, because for now, china is interested in the west, at least, if not economically, then politically weakening, which means it is interested in putin's success in ukraine, and tell me, in principle, if we talk about how the domestic political situation in the united states itself will develop , what do you think about, the very fact that mike johnson was elected speaker of the house of representatives, after this weeks-long marathon of not electing obvious desperate trumpists on the one hand, not electing moderate republicans on the other hand, and then electing a man i am aware of my pro-trump position, why did it all happen? i think there's a lot of factors here, one of the factors is that those 20, 20 to 25 moderate republicans over there could, most of them, at least could be really scared because there were threats against them, there were threats against women

, several of these congressmen, i even translated it on facebook, translated it into russian , published it because it was on cnn, just this recording was played on the air, just checkmate on the threats are absolutely, absolutely terrible on the address of the wife of one of these moderate republican congressmen, who voted against jordan, that is, they could be counted and they could finally decide that there was no point in resisting, on the other hand, johnson, he was not such a famous politician, he was never included in the leadership the group of the republican faction in the house of representatives, that is, probably he, because of this he was more able to accommodate. these moderate republicans, because jordan was already too odious, although johnson is definitely a very right-wing, ultra-conservative politician, er, it is enough to look at his views, at his statements, especially that during the period

when he was not a member of congress, he even advocated the criminalization of same-sex relationships, for the ban of same-sex marriage, respectively, for the ban of abortion, and so on, and for for against any restrictions on the sale of weapons, that is, he has such classic ultra-conservative views, i would compare them to reactionary, i just think that the fact that he is now the speaker, what can happen, he can stay, of course, with his views , but if he wants to be the speaker, that is, if he wants to really lead the house of representatives, and lead the legislative process in the house of representatives, that is, if he wants to be...' an actor, the speaker of the house of representatives is actually the third position in the hierarchy of power in the united states, after the president and the vice president, he then he will have to, he may not change his views, but he will then

have to negotiate with the democrats in the house of representatives, with the democratic leader of the senate , schumer, and with the republican leader of the senate , mcconnell, with the white house, because it is the only the ability to pass bills that can... laws, any bills, because if he's going to carry out the far-right republican agenda, which is to pass bills that only the republican majority of the house of representatives will vote for, those bills will be stillborn, they will never become legal, because the senate will never even consider them, so johnson, if he wants to be the speaker, namely, the ideological leader, the house republican...' he will have to deal with what should the speaker do, that is, exactly what i just said, to conduct negotiations, to agree, so as to adopt bipartisan bills, well actually there is an opinion, even if from

the ukrainian point of view, the healthy wing of the republican party still voted in of the majority for mr. johnson, there is probably some kind of understanding regarding aid to ukraine. mr. johnson said he did. in principle , there is nothing against this, but there are certain buts, and in addition, i believe that it is still necessary to distinguish between the issue of assistance to us and israel, for example, what he is currently concentrating on. what, what he's proposing to delineate aid to ukraine and israel, i think that's bad, because it means that it's going to be all, all, you know, long drawn out, it's going to be looked at for a long time, separately, he, he will to say that let's first consider aid to israel, because this is the hottest place today, this is what is needed immediately, now, we will consider aid to ukraine later, that's about it. which he's probably trying to do, and that's bad, because it's

just that decisions are going to be made later, and he will still be pressured by his far-right colleagues not to consider aid to ukraine at all, because they are against aid to ukraine, that is , it complicates the situation, but at least here he is after being elected speaker, he stated that yes you can't let putin win, but there are all sorts of right-wing republicans, regarding corruption there. in ukraine and so on, well, these are such standard , standard things, i think that the positive thing is that he at least said that putin cannot be given, defeated, and we will not leave ukraine, but the fact that he wants to divide it, i think that it is, on the one hand, his concession to the far-right republicans, who are generally against aid to ukraine, on the other hand, it is an attempt to please him, probably,

the american jewish voter, although this, i think it's futile to try, american jews, 80 % of them always vote democrat, absolutely regardless of what, let's say , a republican administration does, because american jews, such a more liberal-minded people, are more, by far the greater part of them, and they will still vote for democracy, but what he wants to divide complicates the situation, because the white house a week ago last friday, when he asked the congress for help to ukraine, israel there, it was not called taiwan, but actually it's aid to taiwan, and it's funding to strengthen the southern border of the united states, the white house has insisted that it should be included in the package because these are urgent measures to ensure the national security of the united states, you know, i want to still to clarify, because we very often talk about the fact that some

actions of the republicans, regarding the need to divide the package, the ukrainian -israeli one, are precisely aimed at winning the votes and support of the american jewish community, and for me it has been a long time, well, at least since the moment when trump became the president of the united states, it seems that the matter is not at all with the jews, the matter is with the evangelicals, with millions of voters, evangelicals, of whom the united states has many more than all the jews, different. political views, and these people are not at all liberal, and just very conservative, as far as i understand, mike johnson himself is an evangelical, and just all the actions in favor of israel, they support authority in the evangelical communities, which is a nuclear republican electorate, not even a republican one, but an electorate that is trumpist, don't you think , that's right, but this electorate will remain a republican electorate, it really is. nuclear republican electorate in the last 30

years, it is absolutely certain that all evangelicals vote for republicans, separately on the south, the southern southern states, it's absolutely true, i lived in the southern united states for many years, i just saw it, long before trump came into american politics, yes, this is the nuclear electorate of the republican party today, and so the evangelical church, it supports israel, but i still think that the evangelicals would vote republican in any case and will vote republican regardless of what they do again, you know, american politics has just become such that there are certain segments of the electorate that they vote for the candidate of the respective party, without even thinking at all what kind of candidate it is, but if i am a republican, i will vote for trump, because trump is a republican, so so-and-so is my choice only because he republican, and if i'm a democrat, then i'll vote there, accordingly, well, for

biden or for any other democratic candidate, there are many voters who are guided only by that, but you are absolutely right that, yes, evangelical the church, it supports israel, it is a fact. and you isn't the situation that is currently developing in american universities, and which is already starting to resemble what happened in universities in pre-war germany or pre-war poland? it worries me because i myself work in a university, although there is nothing like this in my university, but it worries me because you know, universities should, should teach students not only to become engineers there. whether by doctors or journalists or whoever, and you should teach students to become modern people, and if a person cannot distinguish where there is absolute evil, and where there is, where there is good, then a person cannot simply be uneducated, not modern, this person simply, i do not know, she, she not simply cannot find

the right path in this world, and also, let's say in such universities, there as harvard, as upen in pennsylvania , there were very, very such mass anti-israel demonstrations, of course, it confuses me, it confuses, by the way, many of my colleagues, it confuses in in principle, many teachers in many american universities, because this shows that these students who took part in these demonstrations, well, something is wrong with their perception of the modern world, in general, and the perception of what is good and what is evil, this is evidence of such a disease. i would say, and disease, social disease and evidence of deficiencies in the education system, because if, if, you know, in american, all universities, a third of any curriculum, it's not courses in a major, it doesn't matter whether a student, let's say , is it a medical university, or is it an engineering student

faculty, 30% are various sociology courses from history, i.e. these are what they say are liberal arts, i.e. it is humanitarian... if, if they are taught in such a way that the student cannot understand what is good and where is evil, and many students cannot grow up, so something is wrong with it, something, something is very poorly organized, and it must be reviewed, because otherwise, otherwise society will not have a future if there are people in it who cannot distinguish between good and evil , finally, people cannot distinguish between good and evil, and those people who clearly... their support now in palestine, yes, they articulate it in the context of free palestine, or in the context of supporting the terrorist organization hamas, that is, what does that look like, because i think

it's a little bit different, isn't it, you know, that it really looks like a manifestation, in fact it looks like a manifestation of anti-semitism, in this case , because, well, that's why... it's just a way of not saying that i'm there, i hate jews, but i'm not there, i i hate israel, because i support hamas, because hamas, hamas does what's caused by the fact that israel is bad, well, you know, it's, you can't even call it, it's, it's such a manifestation of political correctness, because it's just, it's just so bad bad, how a bad game with an effort... some pretty face to have with such a bad game, uh , but this, it turns out, i just think that in young people, in students, let's say harvard, this is a manifestation of what they just don't understand what is good and what is evil, and that's too bad because they, if they don't

understand that in this case, they they will not understand it in any case, and such people too, if, if these students are our future, then this future will be, i am very confused by such a future, it is necessary, it is necessary to immediately review why students are taught, first of all, when they are studying on a humanitarian, humanitarian courses should be revised, because such students are not humanitarians, you can , you know, you can say 100 times, yes, i also feel sorry for the children in the gas, when i see the children in the gas among these, these, they are there, the attacks of the attacks of israel some children with crying faces i, i feel very sorry for them, but what their parents did, the choice of their parents was for the fact that what is being done with them now, and

this is what must be understood, because this is the main thing, and let's see this, let's say harvard students, who demonstrate that they do not understand this and do not want to understand it, this is very , very bad, thank you, igor reisenberg , professor of the university, we are in touch, now we will talk about all these international problems with the orientalist mykhailo yakubovich, congratulations mr. mykhailo, i think we 'll see now, mr. mykhailo, i hope, oh greetings, mr. mykhay, good evening, well, let's start with a big rally in istanbul, where..." president recep tayyip erdoğan came to the territory of the former mustafa kemal atatürk airport and gave a huge speech at a huge rally and essentially announced holy war and said that he would prosecute israel as a war criminal and did not condemn the terrorist organization hamas , the leaders of which, it should be recalled, he

met several times, and he never made any claims regarding their humanitarian statements and activities, and here's how this is how it all looks now, turkey's position, turkey's position in this regard is not new, we can still remember the breakthrough of the so-called blockade of gaza, belmavi marmara, when there were victims among the so-called turkish volunteers, when there were actually almost a break in diplomatic relations , this is an old topic in turkey, since erdogan adheres to the corresponding islamist line, and let's not forget that even erdogan's opponents also support palestine, that is, in this case, there is a pro-palestinian position and for rebuke, who has... local elections in march 24th , it is important for him to seize the initiative here, because many quite radical-minded turks

ask, well, why is turkey silent, where are the troops of the former great caliphate, where the ottoman state, why doesn’t it save, let’s not forget that historically for a long time these territories were part of the ottoman empire, and then they were squeezed by the british, not to mention without the support of... the arabs themselves, here, but in this case in erdogan is very good a chance, to become a kind of leader, to show, as it were, to the whole world that he is from this side, and this should have been foreseen, it should have been foreseen, that is , it is not news to anyone, what erdogan began to say, although he again does he pay attention there to israel, to politics there, to zionism, or what is considered in the islamic world to be sio... because this term has long been used in some absolutely wild, i would say strange

meaning, but he does not directly name it there specific persons, that is, as they say, does not close the door for dialogue, and in this way erdogan keeps a window somewhere, some other turkish parties express themselves much more radically, some less radically, but this is a very good chance for him to add a good rating to himself, or at least... to stay afloat and position himself what does such a big, strong man mean, a leader who cares about muslims all over the world, well, erdogan's speech in this field looks very effective now, yes, but at the same time , the question arises, why did he take it, i will still allow to give himself a certain pause, uh, it was a type of preparation for this large-scale speech, before his own electorate, first of all, probably before the turkish people, or are there any other reasons, it seems to me that at the beginning

all these weeks from october 7 he was a little more weighted, well, he was weighted, since it was not clear whether the war would last for a long time, or whether the conflict would end now, that is, this is another escalation, secondly, when there was a fresh informational memory, specifically about the victims, the attack by hamas, to speak from that would be, well no quite comfortable. now we can already see that the attention of the media, including the western media, has shifted to the civilian victims of gas, and a rather strong information campaign is being conducted, not without the participation of russia, iran, and the arab countries, and this time the opponents of israel are much better prepared, i i would even say, it is often better than israel itself in terms of information, and there has already been a rather strong trend here, it is worth even looking at what is being done in the western countries, i

have actually been caught by these events in london now, i had to twice pass by the rally is pro-palestinian, it has gathered more than 100,000 people for the second saturday in a row, while last week the pro-israel rally gathered about 1,000, and in fact the topic of palestine dominates the streets, and of course, the example is from germany, but this trend has gone and is going just an influx, in this case an informational one, in which various forces join in, and erdogan's voice, for many in the west, will not be so controversial here, as they say that erdogan joined hamas, no, erdogan advocates the killing of civilians in gaza, for contradicting this murder, condemning it, as if trying to stop the war, and now, well, this situation looks different, even

if we look at the un resolution, more than 50 countries , so to speak, abstained, including ukraine, including great britain, some of the united states the states voted specifically from pro-israeli positions, the others were generally pro-israeli, but it is so restrained that in case of anything it should not be closed, and i will repeat these words once again, the door to dialogue, so the situation in terms of information is developing. i would say in favor of israel's opponents, and here erdoğan's voice can be very loud, it's easier. saying, what will he gain from this, absolutely nothing, or maybe he just wants to have a loud voice so that he can compete for the place of the leader of the muslim world, let's say with ayatollah khamenei or with the prince of saudi arabia, muhammad. well, the fact is that his position contrasts precisely here, the saudis took it somewhat more

discreetly, the united arab emirates, which especially command excellent relations with israel in general, somehow, at first the mediocre ones tried, well, now it’s clear, they started conditionally sailing in the palestinian side, eh, ayatollah khamenei, he would hardly be a leader, except for the shiites there, lebanon and some such conservatives because of the pro-shiite position, but erdoğan, as such islam in politics, and what is the peculiarity of erdogan, this model of erdogan, such social islamic activism, political, it can be taken far beyond the borders of turkey, that is, such projects of islamist parties, modern, which recognize certain democratic principles, they are possible not only in turkey, the iranian case is an iranian case, to export this islamic revolution somewhere in azerbaijan or even the same turkey or saudi arabia, well , it already looks ridiculous, because it

is tied to this shiite theology, but this one, i would say... islamism with a human face, which is always promoted by erdogan, is much more attractive to many in the islamic world, and here again, well, you can play on panosmanism, play on panyurkism, eh , although in turkey very much they like such noisy politics, everything there is so extremely emotional, and i would, well, in principle, i would not dramatize this so much here, that here erdogan announced right there, dzhigad there and so on, because it is clear that real actions will not follow , but again this shows a certain weakness of the global west, the weakness of the nato block, the weakness of the same allies of israel, it shows the ambiguity and the fact that within the western world itself, such unconditional support for israel, that only because it is israel,

that the jewish people have the right to one's own the state that the jewish people created a showcase of democracy, that western societies are to blame for israel , this will not be so easy, even our own citizens will have to explain why, and even more so let's take the global south, which is generally devoid of these recently , the previous speaker spoke about even conservative protestants who always support israel, purely for such religious reasons, and that israel, for example, is for india, for china. for others, how to explain to the local, well, that is, there, the local elite, which rises, she will have different views, i understand, she looks at where america is going, where russia is going, where other players are going, but even the situation in western universities and in western societies is that both the right and the left join the pro-palestinian rallies there, and

those who are for lgbt rights, and against pravbt, and for climate change, that is, who i just did not... see at pro-palestinian rallies, that is, all those who are somewhere not in the mainstream, but somewhere on the extremes, all ran there to this window opportunities to promote the topic, and this window will expand, depending again, it depends on how events will develop, whether there will be a full-fledged ground operation, which they are talking about, or whether it will not happen, well, here again, but if there is, there is every chance that it will be possible already today will begin after netanyahu's speech about holding some kind of press conference, the reaction will be even tougher, it seems to me, that is, we are entering such a shaking of the world around this topic,