[000:00:00;00] it should be noted that the published information is not an evaluative judgment, as it contains specific statements about the facts regarding the judge's decision in specific cases, which can be verified and contains a requirement to motivate the court decision with certain arguments that should satisfy the author of the publication. one of the arguments that indicates the pressure on the judge, the speaker, a member of the people's party of ukraine burlakov, cites the number of subscribers of the telegram channels on which the post was posted. september 10, 2023 , 13,400 telegram channel subscribers anti-corruption center, and on the same day 16,100 subscribers of the telegram channel in shabunin received messages about judge tkachenko, the content of which is given above. an audience of 29,500 subscribers must be considered

large enough to damage authority... justice. in this way, pressure is exerted on the judge, which may affect his further activities, in particular, the adoption of a certain court decision in a specific case. seven out of 12 members supported the decision to refer the supreme council of justice to the prosecutor general's office vrp, which participated in the vote. and this precedent is dangerous for further control by the public. this position of the vrp endangers anyone who expresses his opinion about the content of court decisions even on the internet. such a practice, great difficulties for other organizations that want to highlight and are going to highlight the activities of the courts, because any criticism, any word that the judges do not like, can be interpreted as interference in the activities of the judiciary , it seems to me that someone in the supreme council justice forgot that we do not have yanukovych or

putin, we have a democratic one. therefore, i would like to wish the members of the supreme council of provosudnia, who voted for this, to get down to earth and read the constitution, public organizations, journalists and activists perform an important function of monitoring the activities of courts and the integrity of judges. now, if any negative evaluation is interpreted as pressure, anyone who publishes their opinion or disagrees can be prosecuted for such interference with a court decision. and for today i have everything. it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the email address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet

in exactly one week. for your attention, news on espresso tv channel, greetings to all viewers, in the studio of iryna koval. the russians continue to terrorize the kherson region. a 46-year-old man died as a result artillery shelling of novorislav. the head of the regional military administration , oleksandr prokudin, emphasizes that forced evacuation continues in the region. 24 settlements are under constant enemy fire. only on friday , 32 children and their families were evacuated from there. yesterday , nine adults and four children, and since october 24, 147 children have already been evacuated. now they

and their relatives are in ... sleep, they receive all the necessary help, but there are 637 children in the territory of settlements with a difficult security situation. ua volunteers animals transports animals from frontline areas and cities. today they rescued four-legged friends from orihiv to zaporizhzhia. their work was observed by our correspondent dmytro didora and he is in direct contact with us. dimo, i congratulate you. please tell me. are there many animals left and what is the current situation in orichov? i congratulate you iro and all our viewers, i was indeed in orihiv today, but i will start with the operational situation that was the day before in zaporizhia in the zaporizhia region. a total of 133 strikes were made by the russians, 20 towns and villages on the line were affected fire in general, the russians were hounded along the entire

front line. and fired three aerial shells at orikhov, where we were today, most of the people, almost, more precisely, all the people who are in the city, they live in basements or in shelters that are in the city, either in their own houses or in the city dwellers, who are set up there, they have already done everything to stay in shelters, they cook there, they have put up so-called shacks to keep the room warm, and they say that they do not want to leave, because if they leave the city, then there won't be a walnut, let's hear it people and now there is no light, there is no gas, water is given, but until 12, we have water, although there is none in the house, but here, this is how we

live, a little room, this is the day i live, cats, here i am, well, for the evening to the grave, for the evening to the grave is already scary, we can’t sleep here, no, this is what it is, almost all the houses are in... their damage, there is not a single surviving house, some of them are completely destroyed, some windows are broken , the roof was damaged, but in addition to people, animals really remain in the city, people who left and left their animals, they are still in place, some joined the military, and some found their new homes in other yards in places, so in particular mrs. olena, whom you just saw, she kept as many as five... dogs in her yard and four cats, and today ua animals volunteers took animals from ms. elena to take them to shelters, and in total there are more than 300 animals left in the place, and let 's hear from local volunteers who are

in orichov and they feed the animals every day so that they are always full , a lot of abandoned, before we had 300 plus animals. now 200 plus or minus, so we are also evacuating , of course, many have been killed as well, well, we are trying to urge people to evacuate animals so that, because some do not want to in principle, and many, well, we stay, feed, take care of them, we are treating, and in general, iro, i want to point out that nuts live even... people try to work in the city, but the russians shell the city every day, one might even say hourly, and in general the locals say that they suffer the most from aviation, like aerial bombs , that the russians drop on the city, as of now i have such information, and i am giving you

the ether. thank you, dima, it was our correspondent, dmytro didora, who is currently in the zaporizhzhia region, who heard such sad news about walnuts. both day and night, the enemy continues shelling orikhov, but the people refuse to leave. and near avdiyivka, our border guards shot down a russian su-25 plane, andriy demchenko, the spokesman for the state border service, said. the enemy target was hit by a ukrainian anti-aircraft missile. as a result of the impact, the plane went up in smoke and took off lose height and ukrainian troops continue to advance in the direction of melitopol. our fighters destroyed 25 enemy units. equipment, including eight tanks, three armored vehicles, 10 drones and four cars. also, the armed forces of ukraine burned five warehouses of russian ammunition, - said the commander of the tavria military group, oleksandr ternavskyi. during the day

, ukrainian soldiers eliminated 489 invaders, another 13 invaders surrendered. the third meeting of foreign policy advisers took place in malta. participants will be considered. five key points of the ukrainian peace formula. it is about nuclear, food and energy security. the release of all prisoners of war and deportees, as well as the restoration of the territorial integrity of ukraine, the president's office reported. diplomats from 66 countries took part in the event , including delegations from asia, africa and latin america. norway will treat ukrainian soldiers. the country's hospitals are already ready to receive our soldiers, and ukrainian hospitals will receive new equipment. this was stated by the state secretary of the ministry of justice of norway, evan erikson, during a meeting with the head of the ministry of internal affairs

of ukraine. the parties also discussed the protection of critical infrastructure and border security. the israel defense forces allegedly suspended our operation against hamas terrorists in the gaza strip. instead of a full-scale invasion , tsagal decided to carry out more limited ground operations. according to american officials. this decision of the israeli military was agreed with the us secretary of defense lloyd austin. this was reported by the new york times. meanwhile, tsagal reported that aviation hit 450 targets in the gas sector, including operational control centers, observation points and anti-tank missile launch sites. the hamas-controlled ministry of health claims 7,800 dead. both sides. urged the civilian population

to move from the north of the sector to the south. yesterday evening, more of our ground forces entered the gas, smashing the stronghold of evil. this is the second phase of the war, the goals of which are clear, the destruction of the military and government potential of hamas and the return of the hostages home. they were like that news at this time, you can read more on our website espresso tv, subscribe. contact us in telegram and watch on youtube, we are working so that you will see the updated issue already at 6 p.m. welcome to the espresso channel. today, in our military program, we will talk about the enemy's weapons and our weapons, but in different dimensions. russia rattled

its nuclear sword again this week and conducted thunder drills, which were supposed to demonstrate the strike capabilities of russian nuclear forces. but what are the real issues in russia with its nuclear stockpiles and what is their condition, why is the enemy interested in such projects as this underwater nuclear torpedo , which is supposed to sail to the usa and cause an explosion there, or why is russia again where...' about the fact that the tests of the burevesnik cruise missile with an atomic engine are about to take place , which is actually a kind of flying chernobyl. we will try to find out all this in the first block of our program in a conversation with a person who, as a scientist, devoted a significant part of his life to the study of russian nuclear forces. and then we will talk about our developments, of course not nuclear weapons, and in the realm of light armor. equipment, because not only foreign supplies should strengthen

our army. about the equipment that passes the test of war in a conversation with the general designer of one of our armored vehicles. all the details in the second part of our program. my name is serhiy ezgurets, i am the director of the information and consulting company defense express, which, together with espresso channels , aims to highlight the most relevant defense-industrial, military and military trends. and now pavel podvykh is joining us, he is a researcher at the institute of un research in the field of disarmament in geneva, head of the russian nuclear forces project. mr. pavel, welcome to the espresso channel. good afternoon, i have many questions for you, so i will start with the most relevant ones. on october 25, russia conducted the grom exercise with practical launches of its ballistic

missiles . the year before last, and what exactly if the enemy uses in these exercises those samples, which were there before, so what does this indicate? that is, as a rule, it is a land-based ballistic missile, missiles from

a submarine, bombers with cruise missiles. therefore, these exercises do not stand out in such a way that, moreover, many paid attention to the fact that attention was emphasized to the fact that russia will practice the use of a massive nuclear strike, and here it is also worth understanding that this is quite standard rhetoric and a scheme of actions that will practice during such exercises, namely the strike in response to the attack, i do not think that here there are some reasons to worry. here are some reasons to be especially worried about these scientists. mr. pavle, you have been working on a project called the nuclear forces of russia for a long time, and how would you characterize the current state of the russian arsenals, is it

development, stagnation or degradation, and with which russia is currently having more problems with the carriers of nuclear weapons, or with themselves warheads? as far as we can judge from what we see and know, i would call the situation stable. i don't see any significant build-up breakthroughs arsenal and deploying a large number of new systems. which is gradually implemented. that is, new land-based ballistic missiles, mines, construction of submarines and missiles for them are being manufactured and deployed, again there is a bomber modernization program. that is, i do not see anything that would go beyond the normal standard

program that was adopted more than 10 years ago. her project faces many difficulties, that any such large program, she eventually faces difficulties. can not to say that it is stagnation, because it is a stable given the planned process , and it does not stand still, and the process of modernization and maintaining

forces in readiness, as for nuclear warheads, it is more difficult to judge there, because there is little information about them, what we can know, there is no reason to think that the situation is fundamentally different from the one described above, there is a process of support in working condition, there are procedures, but to think that there is an increase or stagnation, no, i don't think so. there is some kind of massage going on there increasing the potential, there are no such reasons, everything is going well, more or less, in a stable order. mr. pavel, does the fact that a country conducts nuclear tests mean that this country, in particular, is creating

new nuclear combat units, and does russia have a need to conduct a nuclear test given that it has terminated its membership there in accordance with the speech and in general, is there a need for russia to create new special parts for its missile carriers or other means of delivery? well, the situation is mine look, the situation here is such that, in my opinion, the situation here is such that there is most likely no technical need to conduct such tests, moreover, i am sure that there is no such need, and moreover, that we we know that russian developers talked about the possibility of manufacturing new charges and supporting the modernization of existing ones. this was done already after 2000, when russia ratified the nuclear

test ban treaty. that is, the developers themselves spoke and wrote about their tests. technical solutions that would require nuclear tests are out of the question. it is clear that this step is to abandon the ban treaty. as it is called the treaty on prohibition of nuclear tests, it is a political step, and it is intended to be so, it is perceived as such, and... on the other hand, it should be understood that until the moment of the resumption of tests, the ratification of this treaty

by russia is not approaching, russia remains a country , which signed the agreement, accordingly, despite the fact that it has not entered into force, there are certain obligations, it is not the conduct of nuclear explosions, participation in the work of the international system of monitoring, systyming. mr. pavel, what is the current situation of the russians with tactical nuclear munitions, how can you assess their quantitative and qualitative composition and, first of all , are there any tactical munitions left in the arsenal of the russian army, to artists, to powerful guns to mortars , and are there tactical munitions that can there to be used by special

operations forces, well, in the format of such mobile devices. well, about tactical, about tactical or non-strategic warheads, which not deployed and installed on intercontinental ballistic missiles and so on, there is no accurate information about them. the situation is like this. it is important to understand that such charges in non-combat normal time are located in special warehouses that are far from means of delivery. in the fact that they are all located in special storage facilities, which are actually located far

from the actual means of delivery, that is, if you have an aerial bomb with bombers, then the charges for it hold nuclear warheads, then the bombers, they are not are on duty with these munitions attached, that is, the munitions are lying separately, even several tens and hundreds of kilometers away, but we cannot say exactly how many of them are there, it is clear that how many of them are lying there, we can say for sure, no one can say for sure, and therefore there is such uncertainty, and as for artillery systems and others, at one time russia twisted the artillery ammunition program, the situation there is such that at the time russia stopped

the artillery development program munitions, in the 90s all works were closed and all existing ammunition was destroyed , the department that developed such ammunition was closed, taking into account this and the fact that the usa did not accuse russia of having such ammunition, we can say that no such charges do not exist. did not accuse russia of having artillery ammunition left, i believe that we can with very great confidence, almost certainly say that there are no artillery charges, and the same applies to others who say that called or compact munitions, there is some in the usa, there are suspicions that not all nuclear warheads were destroyed by russia, it is underway, but

simply it has not been finished yet, i do not think that these warheads are really in a condition when they they can be applied, even if they are still somewhere there that have not been destroyed. mr. pavel , what do you think about these, well, high-profile projects with the creation of the russian... federation of torpedoes with a nuclear warhead or the so-called petrel project with an atomic engine, probably a nuclear warhead, why is russia paying so much public attention to this project now? well, in many ways, this is the main, if you can say, almost the main goal of these projects . this is their discussion, what we are talking about them with you now is a long

story, and if we recall 2018, when the russian president talked about them, then everything was served under the sauce of russia's response to the us deployment of an anti-missile defense system. presented under the guise that these systems are russia's response to the united states' deployment of creation of a missile defense system by the united states. but these are all systems, supposedly all systems can bypass the us anti-missile defense. it was like that. it was very important to declare that the united states is doing missile defense, but we have an answer to this, from the point of view, from the point

of view of the expediency of the nuclear system and the possibility of retaliatory strikes, the people who create these systems , they have their own engineering problems that need to be solved, a special design bureau for the petrel was created, i.e. this is all a process that hardly has anything to do with military or strategic expediency

. well, then, continuing this topic, another such a loud statement , or rather a conversation, which was known when rogozin, the former head of roscosmos, says that he reported to putin that they want to adapt the soyuz space launch vehicle to carry out strikes across ukraine, screwing a 9-weight bomb to it there, and it seemed to interest putin, i'm interested in this, what conclusions did you draw about the adequacy of people who discuss such projects? well, come on i refrain from saying any words about adequacy. i think it's understandable, well, let's say so, i was very surprised

by this kind of dialogue, if it was real? even if you discount the questionable competence of some people, it is difficult for me to imagine that such projects can be kept in one's head, it is beyond the limit in my opinion, it is difficult to imagine that someone can seriously even keep such projects in the head, that is, outside of everything, in my opinion. well, when we say then, that such approaches are out of bounds, rational, then the question arises that they will still be discussed, and then, against this background, how can you generally evaluate russia's approaches to the use of nuclear weapons, and in particular, how

do you assess the risks of using nuclear weapons from the outside. federation against ukraine and whether ukraine's actions on the liberation of crimea can be such a certain trigger that, if russia makes such a decision, then the situation is such that it is necessary to understand, first of all, that from a purely military point of view, the use of nuclear weapons not on the battlefield sense scenario, when ukraine can really create a threat to crimea, how can nuclear weapons be used to prevent this? i don't see how it can be done,

how at all it is possible to use nuclear weapons in such a way as to