more, my name is oleg galiv , take care and we will meet you in the broadcast tomorrow, congratulations, it's 10 o'clock, which means that it's news time on espresso, with you. kateryna shirokpoyas works in the studio. all morning, the enemy shelled mykolaiv oblast. in particular, the occupiers hit ochakov with artillery. high-rise buildings, private houses, electricity network and gas pipeline were damaged. there was a gas leak. it was reported to the regional military administration. the russians also raided the settlement of lymany, where the power grid was damaged. previously, people did not suffered ukrainian

defenders shot down a rocket in dnipropetrovsk region. pppo worked at night. the wreckage fell in the dnipro district. serhiy lysak, the head of the regional military administration, reported. dry grass caught fire on the spot, the flames were already tamed. the occupiers destroyed two farm buildings, and windows were broken in three private houses. there are no casualties or injuries. the occupiers fired at the green fields from the rocket salvo system. in kharkiv oblast, a 60-year-old woman was wounded there, oleg, the head of the regional military administration, said sinygubov the russians also struck vovchansk in the chuguyiv district, damaged residential buildings, a veterinary laboratory and an agricultural enterprise. an elderly woman died during enemy shelling of stanislava in the kherson region. during the night, more than 40 arrivals were recorded in the village. the lyceum building and the local dispensary were damaged. as well as private

houses - informed the head of the region oleksandr prokudin. also, during the evening shelling of kherson, the occupiers injured an elderly resident, she was hospitalized with an explosive injury and shrapnel wounds. in general, in a day three residents of the region were killed and four others were wounded as a result of the shelling. the occupiers fired more than 600 shells into the region. kindergartens were also targeted in yeluchany in kherson and beroslav districts, in particular in moskovyta. during wednesday, the russians injured two residents of donetsk region. they came under fire in elizavetivka and maksimilianivka. this was reported by the head of the military-civilian administration of the region, ihor moroz. during the day, the enemy attacked 15 settlements in the region with aircraft. and almost 60 combat clashes took place at the front during the day. according to the general staff, the enemy

mainly attacked from aviation and rocket salvo systems. during the day , the armed forces of ukraine repelled more than 50 attacks in five directions. the russians unsuccessfully stormed our positions in the maryanka region of donetsk region. the enemy also does not stop trying to restore the lost position near khromovoy, klishchiivka and andriivka. surround avdiivka. assault continues south of bakhmut, inflicting the enemy loses and is fixed on the achieved boundaries. and before the losses of the enemy in a combat match, our cossacks lost another 930 muscovites. from since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the armed forces of ukraine have sent 302,420 occupiers to death. and in a day, the russian army irretrievably lost 18 tanks, 43 combat vehicles, 30. four units of automobiles and 13

special equipment, also our fighters converted into brucht-42 artillery systems, four missile systems of salvo fire and three means of pporog, and 20 drones and an airplane, in general, they regretted that they took off, the general staff reminds that all data are indicative, due to thunderstorms and gusts of wind in poltava oblast emergency response electricity networks, therefore, almost 400 consumers were left without electricity, - said the head of the regional military administration philip pronin. currently, energy workers work in bilotserkivska, hrebinkivska and reshetylivska communities. the ukrainian ministry of foreign affairs demands an explanation from turkey regarding the visit of the occupation administration of zyalta. this was stated by the spokesman of the department oleg nikolenko. during the meeting

, the russian and turkish parties discussed the possibility of concluding an agreement on the establishment of sisterly relations. nikolenko emphasized that crimea is part of the territory of ukraine. occupied by russia. therefore, un resolutions require all parties to refrain from actions that could call into question the status of the peninsula. and moldova stops paying contributions to the commonwealth of independent states, a joint organization with russia. against the background of the kremlin's invasion of ukraine , the chisinau authorities announced a gradual withdrawal from the cis. i have already denounced it somewhere. dozens of agreements signed within this association, and i will remind you that the cis was formed after the collapse of the ussr on the basis of post-soviet countries. ukraine stopped participating in the organization's statutory bodies back in 2018, due to russia's attack. and in

dnipro, law enforcement officers discovered an arsenal of weapons in the interior of a local resident's car. the suspicious car was stopped during patrolling. behind the wheel. was an elderly man, during the inspection, a pistol with cartridges, a hunting rifle, two magazines equipped with cartridges, as well as an unregistered hunting rifle were found in the car, all weapons and ammunition were seized and sent for examination. november 2 is the international day to end impunity for crimes against journalists. under during the war, the work of media workers in ukraine was significantly complicated by new risks and. about the cost of our colleagues telling the world current news in the conditions of a full-scale invasion, let's see further.

murders, attacks, kidnappings, these are the realities of journalism in ukraine, and if you used to be able to suppress your own, now the enemy is bigger and more aggressive, to tell the world the truth, copper workers work during air raids, under shelling and under occupation, sometimes you have to pay for your voice life, but crimes against society are not only murders, murders of journalists, wounding of journalists, attacks on journalists, attacks on tv towers, turning off ukrainian television, cyber attacks on media sites of channels, the freedom of speech barometer of the institute of mass information is soaring, since the beginning of the great war, russia has committed 540 crimes against journalists and media in ukraine, they record murders, disappearances, kidnappings, injuries , attacks on journalists and tv towers, cybercrimes, etc., all this does not allow the truth to be heard, it is a very risky job, but another way to show the world what is happening

it is impossible in ukraine, we are proud of those journalists who continue to work in small local newsrooms, literally a few kilometers from the headquarters or on the front line, because this is the only source of reliable verified information for local residents. the hottest news now from the front. filming at the front is provided by press officers, they take permission to record from them, they negotiate with unit commanders and accompany journalists. however, such filming is always a danger. the inscription of the press on a bulletproof vest or a fairy tale, a trophy target for russian soldiers. russia has repeatedly violated international. laws, rights and customs of the norms of warfare, firing at cars with representatives of journalism, journalists with inscriptions and press, firing at them with heavy artillery weapons, also using unmanned aerial vehicles, unfortunately, we already

have cases when journalists during the performance of their of official duties died at the hands of rioters, at the hands of the occupiers, crimes against the media are crimes against humanity, so it is important to use the existing mechanisms of the un, the council of europe, the osce, the eu and international criminal court to punish the guilty. punishing the russians for crimes against freedom of speech, as well as for their other atrocities, is currently almost impossible, but the work is underway. it is impossible to simply document and talk about the fact that journalists risk their lives. it is necessary that each of these cases be brought to justice, and that everyone who is guilty of attacks. on journalists, every russian war criminal, he was punished. every piece of news from ukraine is a threat to russian propaganda, which is why the occupiers are so afraid of the media. according to the institute of mass information, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, russian inhumans have killed 68

journalists, 10 of them while performing editorial tasks. well, in order for the russian inhumans to have even more, we must work hard every day. we are planning the purchase and modernization of a jeep for the reconnaissance rapid response group of the third ssso regiment and ask you to join this collection. after all , these boys and girls constantly remind the occupiers with aimed fire, or they did not even try to set foot on ukrainian land, otherwise it will burn under their feet. auto for the defenders have already been found, you just need to dig. our goal is uah 25,000. we still have a little bit left to it. therefore, from each donation, we will have what we ask for, because the war continues and the help of each of us is extremely important. for now, this is all the news i have for this time, we will see you in less than an hour, then

my colleagues, lesya vakulyuk and andriy saichuk, are waiting for you on the air. dear friends, we are returning to etter, andriy saichuk and lesya vakulyuk, you will spend the next two hours in our company, and we will be in yours, please join espresso, our the marathon continues, now we will talk with oleksandr musienko, director of the military law center. of research, mr. oleksandr, we welcome you to our airwaves, i congratulate you. mr. alexander said, they say that this was the first thing john fitzgerald kennedy said, probably he also repeated someone's words of his time that in victories, there are a thousand fathers, defeat is always an orphan. well, someone has to take responsibility, for now it is the commander-in-chief, zaluzhny, who admitted that we have problems at the front after all, and the situation has reached an impasse. and it is like that the result of our offensive, which lasted six months,

and there is still a serious uncertainty, which , nevertheless, mr. zaluzhnyi analyzes and offers ways to solve. in your opinion, how do we need to change, what conclusions did you draw , in particular, from this publication by valery zaluzhnyi the economist, what you read between articles, including, for sure, that there is no defeat, it is obvious, it is not even close . it is just that in order to achieve final victory, we need the appropriate resource, strength and means, which we lack in order to accomplish this surge, because we have entered the period when war is really technologically changing, and we are entering a state of positional war, because , let's say, the existing weapons and equipment do not provide an opportunity to achieve a qualitatively different result. today on the battlefield, that's all, this is not a loss for ukraine, but

simply in order to ensure its victory, a number of things are needed, which the commander-in-chief clearly indicated in this material, in order to achieve these goals, that's it so i saw it, in case it is not provided, then it will be difficult to achieve the goal, and the war of position can drag on for a long time, which is certainly not included. in ukrainian national interests. the republicans, by the way, are also raising this topic in the congress, in the senate, in the usa, and a few weeks ago there was a letter to biden, one of the leaders, actually the head of the republicans of the committee on defense of the united states, regarding biden, whether there is a strategy for the victory of ukraine, now it is formulated as hard as possible, that is , is there such a strategy, because the republicans will say that they are not ready simply pour money without understanding. how and when, under what conditions will the war in ukraine end, is it fair, so to ask the question in your opinion, is it a plus for us or

a minus for us? well, i can't comment on the actions of the congressmen of the united states, it's their right to ask any questions of the president of the united states, the part i'm going to take, or the secretary of defense of the united states, whoever they can ask, as far as we're concerned, i think that the issues that were directly related to ukraine in this letter are relevant to them from a military point of view, more from the military, partly from the political, from the military-political, answered the commander-in-chief of the armed forces in his interview, his column that he did for zaeconomist, the vision of what is needed, precisely in this letter it was said that it is necessary to form a request , what is needed for ukraine, in what volumes, what sums for it, and so on and what can be achieved, this is what general zaluzhnytsia formulated from a military point of view. from our point of view, what concerns and was asked from ukraine, then this question is already

to the united states, to the president of the united states and the secretary of defense of the united states, who, well, will provide an answer, in part they are already providing it, because there are relevant events taking place there in the congress, secretary of state blinkin has already spoken, i think, we will see further, well, of course, the same will follow from this depend, we are still imposed, in addition to the fact that this is of course a pre-election year , in the united states, and there is a lot of domestic political situation in the united states, it is imposed on what is happening, on the allocation of aid, on dopo packages and the like, the future, it is of course not really positive for us, of course, but in the end, from its side, well, let's say, from the ukrainian side, everything is being done to probably provide this answer from the military, as for the political part, it is clear that any help, it needs very detailed

reports, many reports about its use, about what went wrong, what needs to be done differently, what amounts are needed, what this or that, what are the conditions for this, well, this is a complex job, i mean, it all boils down to the question, give us more high-tech weapons and we then we will win this war on our own terms, the question that the republicans are also raising now in the states, it is also an undermining of the very realism of the strategy presented by ukraine in the person of our president, volodymyr zelenskyi, that is, they doubt that ukraine can and is actually capable , for example, to liberate crimea in the near future, that is what, it seems to me, is also a question that we need to find an answer to, do we also think that this is an unrealistic assessment, or do we still think that this can be achieved, as we then prove it soon how much it would cost in human

lives, in i don't know, in some billions of dollars and so on. i will tell you that regarding crimea , these are constant discussions, i have repeatedly participated in various expert dialogues with europeans and with americans, and the issue of the discussion regarding the liberation of crimea has been going on for a year , no less, apparently, regarding how it is possible, or is it possible will russia use tactical nuclear weapons, and most, believe me, in the west agree that the risks of russia using tactical nuclear weapons increase as soon as ukrainian forces will enter crimea, this is a consolidated position of both the countries of the european union and the united states, well, these are the realities that exist, at the same time, no one gives up the idea of ​​deoccupying crimea, and of course, why, because it is a security issue

not only ukraine, but this is also the issue of cutting off russia from the black sea, and this is very important, in order not to give them the opportunity to destabilize the situation, in general, just discussions continue about what resources are needed and whether ukraine is even able to implement it, this is also a question that is, it is constant, it is constantly on the surface, and of course we understand that if the counteroffensive strategy had worked differently, if it had been possible to carry out this offensive differently, perhaps we would have already discussed other events, other directions, now not the movement of the robot or novoprokopivka or verbovoy, and the movement somewhere in the district of the crimean isthmus and so on and so on, well, but this is not happening due to certain objective reasons, which are, well, you see, this discussion is somewhat overheated in our country even to the fact that on are constantly going west discussions, there are constant discussions at different levels and they will go on, and

you can't do anything about it, the extent to which we find arguments and convince ourselves that we are capable of achieving these goals is another question. objectively explaining why, quite often in us the emotional component is simply transferred rationally, and because it is understandable, because the war is on our territory, emotions cannot be avoided, it is normal, but when you talk there with one of our western partners, friends, in for them, the emotional component is somewhat muted, because it does not hurt them as much as it hurts us, and they are conducting a fairly rational discussion of various possible scenarios, but at the same time... i will tell you that despite the fact that they talked about the risks of using weapons, one more thing, no one came out and said that you know that ukraine cannot to liberate crimea, strike military facilities in crimea and so on, they still managed to convince in the strategy that at least missile strikes on enemy military facilities in crimea must be carried out, and they are carried out,

and we are given the tools for this , not really a large number, but they are these missiles, well, it’s not even a year yet, but according to its results, ukraine may have lost more territory in a year than it has returned, despite the fact that we have been on the offensive for six months, well, that is, this is the reality that we we can’t turn a blind eye either, and this is exactly what valery is trying to say, it seems to me that valery is also opportunistic in his column for the economist, that is, how do we try to convince our partners, perhaps, of our ability to win, but do we ourselves understand the price of this and whether we have realistic tasks, that is, in other words, is volodymyr zelenskyi's plan really realistic? well, the plan of volodymyr zelenskyi. it comes from what the ukrainian people aspire to, i think that all sociological surveys, they demonstrate that there are borders of 1991, and people are not ready to cede

territories, and are not ready to recognize, well, that is , how can we build a strategy differently, and even more so, without setting maximum goals, you will not achieve even tactical progress, it happens. actually, that's another question that we're limping on the information component, the information and communication component, which does not communicate some points that should be communicated and explained, and i can see this even in the examples of what is happening, for example, even now with avdiivka, when we are once again experiencing a certain incitement , as well as a situation which, as was the case with bakhmut, and of course, that the military become hostages of all these moments, the information and communication component, when a certain scenario of events is imposed later, well, a different one, that is, strictly speaking, in this is

the problem, in the end of setting the problems, well, absolutely, well, this is absolutely the desire of the people, it is so today , it cannot be ignored the desire of the people , in order for the desire of the people, whether people have enough information to have their aspirations, to they were objective, and if, for example, people's aspirations change, if, if people are more informed about the losses, about the price that will have to be paid, will such social, sociological polls remain the same, well, for today, they remain so, it is obvious that ukraine has not yet passed that threshold of sensitivity, when they are ready to say everything, let's lay down our arms and admit... to the current state of affairs , which is, you see, well, it is, it is as it is today, uh, the question is simply

a discussion is needed, is there a need for a discussion, or people, do we respect our citizens enough to trust them with the right to choose, in this case, if we still have a democracy, for example, for when we talk about the liberation of crimea and include it, for example, as one of the prerequisites now, well, what is written about useful, it is about the fact that we cannot... ' with the mobilization that exists now, to achieve these goals, are we ready to frankly tell people what kind of mobilization in this case we need, to understand what the clear structure of this mobilization will be , how many people should be drafted into the army and how many people are likely to die next year trying to achieve these goals, are we also ready to say that even the liberation of crimea, and this should be said not by luzhug, not zabrodsky, but by political leaders, does not guarantee us completion. war, again, well, that is, there are a lot of things, what do you think, whether they will talk well with society, or society should not know the consequences, steps, for which

, nevertheless, society is offered to pay with the lives of their children, sons, fathers, daughters, and so on, and so on, well, you know, i will tell you that they are reacting, of course, and the military is reacting, we also have an offensive tactic, well , that is, a counter-offensive, it is obvious that the counter-offensive tactic that was proposed at the beginning, it was postponed and it was rejected, i.e. it was completely revised, i'll tell you what the offensive was considered from the beginning taking into account the losses of at least two-thirds of each brigade that was supposed to take part in offensive actions, the economist wrote about this publication probably back in the summer, and this strategy was revised, in particular by our military leadership, due to the fact that it involved rather high losses

, and that's why the offensive went, that's one of the reasons why the offensive went the way it did, actually, and well, it's a reaction, of course, nobody wanted to increase the number of casualties, it's absolutely normal, the right thing, now in the same way, if you turned the question to mobilization, then in your interview, comment, journalist's comments for how... instead , the commander-in-chief said that we cannot compete with russia with mobilization potential, we can only compete with innovation, decision-making and weapons, in the column he asked the question on mobilization about mobilization last in priorities , which are for needs, that is, the last question, why is it defined like this, it is defined for a reason, because first there are first priorities in providing weapons, then if we leave on understanding, we will have these weapons, we are starting to understand how many people, brigades will be needed to implement certain tasks, that is, it is already derived from the issue of weapons anyway, i do not believe in any scenario in

ukraine, when it will be possible to mobilize 5 million people there or a million people, give them exclusively small arms of five rounds and say go conquer the territories, i think it will last a week and everything, and then it will end with the collection of weapons, and people will disperse, that's all, so it won't work, in our conditions it can work for some time in russia, and even in them, there are problems with this, but it will not work in our realities, and the military leadership and military p they understand this, absolutely, that is why the search for a way out of this situation is underway, how, and therefore the question mobilization is placed, well, it cannot be placed, but it is not placed at the very top of this pyramid. mr. oleksandr, why do we mostly learn such sobering information about the war from foreign media, while in our country, for example, if we recall the beginning of a full-scale invasion, from each iron, an expert named

arrestovych said about two or three days. well, this is not a question for me, it is a question for those who want to listen to certain people, you understand, and do both what they want to hear, and the one who invites them there, gives them the right to speak, that is, a person can choose, today, the world is developing technology so much that today a person can choose, if not from one source of information, then from another, whom he trusts and hear sometimes even unpleasantly some truth, that is, the right there is always a choice, the question is who wants to hear what and in what period of time, well, this is normal , this is a natural state, you understand, last year the situation was when kherson was liberated, then kharkiv oblast was liberated, hopes for a counteroffensive, talking about what

and to talk about the fact that he might not be very successful, it was absolutely not the idea that could have been, excuse me on the sidelines, well, that’s how it was, nowadays trends change, the situation changes, well, just like that, you understand, when i spoke in may and june about the fact that it is far from a fact that we will finish the fact that we will even reach crimea as a result of this counteroffensive, taking into account the trends, but then there was a different position, starting from the position of the head of ukrainian military intelligence and others, and of course. that public opinion was inclined then, that's all, but there were people who spoke about it before, it's just that this popular point of view was drowned out by completely different moods, and now the moods are changing, the evaluation of information is changing accordingly, some of it is sometimes negative, because it is from extreme to extreme, and it cannot be done like that, it must be done to try to assess what is happening as objectively as possible, to say, here is bad, here is not so bad, and here it is possible and good,

well, but such are the realities. the question, aresstovych, as a phenomenon, not just as himself, as a person himself, but a collective image of those who gave such a sweet pill to people, that is, he appeared because people wanted to hear good information, or he spoke good information so that to lull people's attention, we have a moment, you know, i think he appeared because, apparently , someone needed to speak, here he is appeared, performed a certain function. plus maybe i don't know how to use it to build my career, well, i did it the way i did it, many obviously liked it, now i don't like it anymore, rhetoric changes, people change, their position changes from time to time, this is also inherent in people. mr. oleksandr, thank you very much, oleksandr mosienko, director of the center for urban and legal studies, was with us, a difficult conversation about difficult times and difficult affairs, in the country at the front, did not have time to ask one more question, but which is also very important, what

concerns political life, but we will talk about it, now we are going to take a short break, then we will continue the conversation, oh , did you twist your back or joints, flamidez, flamidez gel quickly reduces inflammation and cures pain, from pain in the back and joints flamidez, there is discounts on bronchial cough lollipops, 10% in pharmacies plantain and save, tired of heavy and bulky saws, then the compact and powerful strong saw from unpack tv is just for you. now you can easily trim trees and bushes. strong saw is so convenient to use for carpentry. it is the perfect tool for your home or garden. and the price is only uah 1,499. a reliable battery is also included. cut branches, cut timber, chop firewood. you will do all this in one movement with the strongg saw. just look at how quickly

she copes. even with thick branches, the strong saw.