[000:00:00;00] and now it is necessary to compensate for it with something as much as possible, er, there are serious problems when considering issues for the next financial year on armaments, on financial assistance, they will be solved, i am sure of it, but how will they be solved and with what amounts of funding for of ukraine, how quickly, all this very much affects the war, the front , that is, on... a reliable rear information, communication, development of various solutions, new ideas, overcoming, well, if there is such fatigue, those who make decisions, i understand them, it's not easy, let's be honest, it's not easy, despite the fact that people often criticize, but not just now and in key government offices, not just volodymyr zelskyi, but it will be easier if we finally decide that it is

not them after all. it is the duty of the whole country to fight, and it is also necessary to do it together, and not somehow personified or alone, as written in this material, in order to complete this topic, because it really turned out to be so controversial and debatable in ukraine, we will show a small fragment, what the secretary of the national security and defense council, oleksiy danilov, said about this of the whole situation with time magazine, he called on the law enforcement officers to deal with anonymous people from the office of the president of ukraine. let's hear what he said. at every meeting of the stake, the president pays maximum attention to those problems, those events, those e-e news that are directly from the front, because all representatives of the highest military and political leadership of our country take part there and tell that

there is someone, something.. .' in a hurry or as it is said, let's say, came and left, well, it's something in general, and some strange things, it firstly, secondly, i don't understand where the author gets such things from, you know, for me this anonymity, anonymity, it raises a lot of questions, if you have some position, if you think that our country cannot win victory, then you have no right to be near our president, this hypocrisy, let's say anonymity, it does enormous damage. first of all to our country, and i would think that our, our bodies should give an answer, what are these anonymous people who do not believe in our victory, but are close to the president, the most important thing the question of who is with the president, although, although in this situation it is obviously necessary to talk about how, how, in general, society talks about and about what, this is also a very big question, at that time, at that time, when

oleksiy danilov commented ukrainian media or rather ukrainian this publication at halftime in the senate, in the senate committee on appropriations, there was a meeting of the meeting about the financial support of the united states of america and israel, and what lloyd osin, the secretary of defense, of the united states of america, said about the fact that without financial support of the united states and nato, the ukrainians may lose the war, that is, he is talking about the possible loss of the war if there is no war. help, let's listen to austin. i can guarantee that putin will succeed without our support. if we knock the ground out from under them now, putin will only become stronger and succeed in what he wants in seizing the sovereign territory of his neighbor. i think that if putin succeeds, he will not stop at ukraine. if you're a baltic country, you think i'm next, and you know, i've no

doubt it's early. sooner or later he will challenge nato and we will find ourselves in a firefight. mr. valery, whom osin is trying to convince, who else in the united states of america does not quite understand why money is given, why such allocations go to the defense of ukraine. by the way, pay attention, these are quite frank performances, such as open, with the door open. and i, i listened, this is the appropriations committee, the door was opened for the congress, for the public, that is, there were , uh, absolutely, well, very specific statements and answers, and it was available, but it is not available to us in ukraine, no hearings committee there is no parliament, we do not see the parliament at all, well, how can this be allowed , america is also not in a simple situation, when

they will tell me that we have... a war and everything must be closed, this is only said by those who do not know how to work in communications during the war, if you don't know how to work, then go from those positions and let others who don't know how. know how to make the parliament more accessible and hold parliamentary hearings, then get out of here, there is no need for such and such work, well, because what, well, what, how much can be said about it, already for a long time, everyone has been changing their approaches and it is not possible to draw any conclusions, therefore, to whom they turn , of course, they turn now to those who will make decisions about the allocation of funds, and it is very good that for us... in many ways, this work is done precisely by loydin, just thank you it is also possible for antony blinkin and those who, well, joseph biden, who delivered such a very decisive speech that, in principle, did not

leave any doubts about not only the support of ukraine, but also the answer to putin's next ultimatum, that is, i think that these these speeches, then they still appear in the american media, and these arguments that the question of supporting ukraine or israel is now so, because the focus of attention has also shifted to israel, it is a question of national security of the united states of america, it is true, that is, in this in this case, the national security interests of the united states and ukraine are completely aligned , stopping russian aggression and preventing russia from winning, which i do not... cannot fully agree with, i understand that these arguments work in the united states, but i do not i agree with the thesis that without the united states, ukraine will not win, that is, the matter is not different

, the united states provides critical assistance not only in the military sphere, more than 40 billion, but also financial support and not only the united states, well, it could be said more broadly, that is it's not only the united states, it's the european union, it's countries like japan, south korea , it's canada, it's, it's many countries that help us, and themselves, and help themselves, so basically, these arguments are more on american citizens , american lawmakers to achieve, achieve now allocation of funds for the next whole year so that there are no longer any opportunities for political turbulence to somehow kill the choice made by the administration of the united states of america to support ukraine in order to, well, win the war, of course, many questions can arise here

arise, what is victory, well, in principle, i think that according to our approach and that formula, peace, which is the formula of victory, it has long been familiar to everyone, that is, our position is generally clear. eh, and i hope that such, frank, persuasive, professional speeches of key, officials, high-ranking officials of the usa, they will contribute to the passage of financial aid to ukraine, you already mentioned, mr. valery, about anthony blinken, the secretary of state of the united states of america, who also spoke in congress during the hearings, and he said about a clear communication the connection between the wars in ukraine and in... in the gas sector, let's listen to what blinkin said. the military conflicts in ukraine and the middle east are clearly connected, as we have cut off russia's traditional means of supplying its military, it increasingly turns to iran for

help. in response, moscow supplies iran with increasingly advanced military technologies that pose a threat to israel's security. allowing russia to succeed with iran's support would be encouraging. both moscow and tehran. during all the time that has passed since october 7, 2023, the day of the hamas attack on israel, we have seen how russia is trying to return to international politics, and putin, including that he was trying in some way to show himself there as a negotiator, a person, which can resolve this conflict as they do. in exchange, it is certain that for something, how would you characterize it now, what place russia occupies in the middle east conflict, and whether it can play a greater role, well, for example

, in order to stir up the arab-israeli conflict and create a greater the tension zone in the middle east, they do it , their approach is actually to create a conflict first, if they would intensify it with their not, not as they want, covered by some actions, well, for example, i do not have no doubt that hamas terrorists. they themselves learned how to operate new systems, well, the same drones that they used, that is, this attack was carried out despite the fact that it is possible not, well, not the war, and not the means that russia uses in relation to ukraine, the most modern and everything they have, but hamas also did it from the air, from the water and from the land, and it was noticed, that is, it was precisely on... militants, trained terrorists,

where they could be trained, we saw attacks , where american operations in syria took place on the base, for example, and who was operating in syria at that time, they will tell you the graves of 200 wagnerites who were covered by an american strike in 2018, when they went to an american protected, protected facility, although there were very few americans at this facility, but they asked for help, which was simply slapped by all these 200 militants, that is, they can either be called mercenaries or terrorists depending on the task they perform, so it is clear that both russia and iran are involved, in such a group of countries, even i expanded at the expense of the north korea, which has provided, according to the data, those who are at least in the state, with reference to the official spokesmen of the south korean government

intelligence, that a million, a million shells have now been provided to russia, north korea, that is, it is all interconnected, it is all coordinated , and how else can you say that russia does not do this, if they accept hamas terrorists, that is, and right next to it, the deputy minister of legal affairs of iran, and what other picture do you need to see the complete coordination of actions terrorists hamas, iran and moscow, that is, the kremlin, it is obvious, well, in this case, the ministry of legal affairs of russia is also involved there, what are their capabilities, well, in short, the capabilities of russia are incomparable to what they are using until now, these are capabilities of the soviet union, and now they're basically trading their, uh, that kind of technology that they've inherited in a lot of ways, but they're now giving it to these pariah countries or ... terrorist groups in

exchange for what they're going to create pressure on the united states, creating such chaos that is, and russia will offer some of its own, as you rightly said, well, it’s strange, it sounds funny, intermediary services, but, yes, they do that, and putin, you remember, invited joseph biden there for pancakes, by the way, well, it’s from resolution, this was done and he received an answer, but nevertheless, they have , they have leverage, due to the fact that they have made a mess in syria, and they have influence there, there are still americans in syria their military, just as they still remained in afghanistan, that is, it is a very difficult regional situation, and the likelihood of a regional conflict, in this case, either israeli-palestinian or more broadly israeli-arab, that will be a truly regional conflict, well, it is, and it

changes every week, depending on the steps that all the players involved in this situation take, and i think that there was a moment when i would estimate even there 40 percent , the possibility of a regional war, now it has decreased a little, two aircraft carriers have come, two aircraft attack groups, a lot of constant work is being done, well, actually china now wants to to meet with the leader of the united states, joseph biden, that is, all this so far reduces this pressure a little, but unfortunately, this possibility remains, i will tell you, moreover, russia has not stopped looking for another point to blow it up from the middle, they they are trying to do it in africa, in particular, the very difficult situation in sudan, and the same thing... they do it in the country where they supply weapons, and these weapons

are gladly accepted, well, let's not forget and it is very important, this is just a southern east asia and the south china sea, that is, very important the region, uh, there's been a lot of these lately, well, mutual ping-pong with statements south korea, north korea, and i think that the great desire... these, i'm well said correctly that this is bad news, actually, there it is possible to add a couple of countries, but they are already defined in america, let's say, as countries that sponsor terrorism, everyone knows them... by the way, something similar should be done in ukraine as well, we still maintain diplomatic relations there with iran, despite the fact that constantly their

drones, their productions and those that they granted uh, not just a franchise, they themselves helped the russians to build the plant, that is, from drones, that is, all of this, well, you have to react to it, you have to react to it, i understand, you have to do everything in time so that it affects the situation, there are moments when you missed and your diplomatic actions won't affect anything, but then you don't need to miss moments to still influence something, now there is the issue of russia providing technology to north korea and iran, iran, by the way, how is it no wonder, now he is chairing the committee, the council human affairs of the un, where russia was not allowed, and iran takes the presidency there, and one more. moment, these missile technologies that iran has, they are also dangerous, well, that is, such a knot is twisted not only in the middle east, now the world is moving very quickly, it is divided into two parts, no longer according to the geographical principle, but precisely according to the principle of whether countries are ready

uphold the rules that have already been agreed upon for many decades and the un charter to be enforced, do countries want this... undermine the order from the middle in order to impose their model, which has already been declared, its model of the world, in this model, you, without difference, you are a terrorist or you eat people, in the literal sense of the word, there are still leaders in some countries, and it is not only samosas, as it turned out, until now there is still such a thing, and sorry, not samosa, well, you know better examples of the world, that's why... that's why i think that this news, it's just about such, well, to put it this way, dictatorial authoritarian regime and regimes that all- they still obey the rules and international law, but now this struggle is unfolding

just before our eyes, on everyone, in all directions, and in the un, and in various organizations, and mainly in the fight of cyber war, in which the roosters take a very active part... korea is taking iran, russia is taking, this is a war that we invisible, but this war can be called a world war, it unfolded very quickly, attacks and counter-attacks are ongoing, and many countries are already involved in this war, well, information, information, also, counter-information, information measures, all this is very actively used now , so i see what we have in common. well, defense and victory are possible to build already at this stage only after overcoming not only one russia , namely the intentions of all these countries, to destroy the world and lead us to chaos, and therefore the war between russia and ukraine, it

de facto turns into a world war in the understanding of these players dimension, i would say, it is not the third world. but the measure of the involvement of various players is this, and this must also be constantly said, it is very important for us that this be perceived as joint actions, not only ukrainian ones, we must be together now and we stand on the front line, on the first line of this struggle, that's why this community and the fact that helping ukraine is helping ourselves, it should be a key narrative in today's world information space, what we have to fight for, and here is the question... of the package with israel shared by taiwan, and here and the issue of joint actions on world platforms , that is, obviously, what narrative should be heard now, for me it is obvious, it is the withdrawal of the war from a one-person confrontation of ukraine against russian aggression to the global level

of overcoming this global crisis, at least now, which could lead to at least regional military conflicts that destabilize the world, republican senator mitch mcconnell has already spoken about the evils, and after that the chinese leader sent a greeting card or a greeting letter to the participants of the annual gala dinner of the national committee on us-china relations and xijin pin wrote in this leaflet that it is necessary to establish the correct path of mutual understanding, to have, we must have a decisive one. significance for the global world and development, as well as for the future of humanity, should it be perceived as china's leader's response to mitch mcconnell and the americans who say the new gospel of evil is china, russia and iran.

well, my impression, after all, despite the fact that the rivalry with china is the main, main direction of the usa, and that there will be conflicts and there will be difficult situations, i have no doubt, but still for today, no china is not yet ready for such conflicts, nor the usa, they do not want such conflicts and more. are strong enough to counteract this, so this situation is quite interesting, there is a desire for a statement, some strategies, yes, basically a struggle of strategies it goes, everyone understands that if the world goes as it is now, then it cannot be avoided in a few years there , well, a few - i think that, after all, the fact that china has determined its strategy somewhere before 2035 to reach military readiness.

this is exactly the rivalry of the usa, in 2027 on the military level, in order to take control of taiwan, well, at least, to be ready for various means, everyone knows this, and therefore the usa, in this way, as the main rival for world, global leadership speak out, in relation to us, i do not count china among the axis of evil, i i just see that china is definitely helping now, it is clearly helping putin, it has helped until recently, and it is enough not to supply weapons , enough is the political, serious support that russia has from china, it is there, no matter what it says, china is talking about the specifics of establishing peace, but i'm sorry, in a month china's position is the same as that of the usa, and there will be no further russian aggression, i can...' it's on my fingers to prove why yes, it won't happen right away, but china doesn't want it, it

just wants to weaken the united states, but that no less, i emphasize once again that it is in the tactical interests of china to find an understanding with the united states now, at least in the economy, well, they want to, they don’t even hide it anymore, they want to divide the world, but there is a part of the world where china has some of their own interests, and that's where the usa is. with allies, it was unequivocally said so, even before the meeting in san francisco, we will see its results, the usa is not the country that will go to the division of the world, now in such categories, there is no thinking, but that some can be achieved compromises at this meeting, perhaps if it ends in a severe misunderstanding of each other, it will be bad for everyone, so china , just as a country that is such a beneficiary, yes, it is in some ways such

a suzerain for its vassals, russia and iran, they understand that they are no longer players, well, iran still wants to develop, and russia is already falling down, it is obvious for china, china does not want to be close to losers, but it wants to use russia for its own, anti-american purposes, so we will see the meeting , i really hope that we will get some new result and still a more, well, more favorable for peace, for the whole world position of china, what arguments will the usa have, they have arguments, this is a huge export of china and the united states, these are new technologies, without which china will not actually reach its military potential, because china is now in a difficult and rather difficult economic situation, when the stock market could actually collapse and the stock market showed the lowest

shares since 19, and in principle now the central committee even gave orders, well, which are absolutely not market in order to keep the situation under control, so investors have come out to some extent, if there are new numbers, but i have seen 7.5 billion recently in direct investment, that is , there who planned to put, so china has an economic interest, but strategic interests global will remain exactly the same, well, for us it is important for ukraine that now, because you know, globally, strategically, in 15 years that is all, you can talk, but for a country that loses people every day and civilians are simply killed by rockets, it is necessary now that now in next week months, this is what interests us most of all, and here is the result of the meeting in san francisco, i would say, it will not be in the fields, apek, i

don’t like the word in the fields at all, in general... this summit will actually be in addition to the main event of the meeting between the leaders of china and the usa. mr. valery, two years ago, vladimir putin proposed to the west, well, to create a new kind of agreement, a conceptual agreement, a security agreement, as he said at the time, it was just before the war, november 2021, and there were clauses regarding implementation, which putin wanted. to be considered for discussion with the americans and nato representatives. and we were actually talking about a new, new, some kind of agreement, relatively speaking yalta 2.0, because the entire system that was formed before the 21st year, it was active in the 45th year, and it is clear that in this situation, obviously, now, this multipolarity , which

putin talked about, and it seems that he was talking about this multipolarity, in fact. he wanted there, conditionally speaking, to have three poles in the world, well, in his understanding then, russia, the united states of america and china. er, now with xi jinping's rhetoric, it is clear that xi jinping wants two poles, that is, china and the united states of america. this meeting, which is planned in san francisco, will apparently give xi jinping answers about what the united states of america can offer china in. the answer to these pleas is to share the responsibility for the fate of humanity, as xijinping says, what do you think about this situation, and how do you think that in this situation biden can play on the side of ukraine, so that xijinpin can influence his vassals in the russian

federation, in belarus, in iran, which supports russia, and in general, how likely is it that xi jinping will help russia withdraw its troops from the territory of the ukrainian state, well, i will say for a moment that putin has only seen a bipolar world, he only knows that, the soviet union and the united states, and he offered so, that's when he was in this ultimatum, it was blackmail and an ultimatum, after all . of leningrad, that 's about as much as if there was something from the proposal, they might have been considered, but there was direct undisguised blackmail, and therefore, well, him, well, any politician in the usa he would not have been able to accept this blackmail, because it was a challenge, the challenge was accepted, but putin, in his own style, decided to take revenge where he is weaker, and as he always does,

that means he hits his compatriots there, did he hit countries, brothers, yes, brothers, well, this, this, this is such cynicism, bullying , but it is from weakness, not from strength, he really, really, really wants to fight the usa there, well, go and fight, you have a beringo river there, cross it and fight, go to alaska there, go, why are you sitting, such they are sitting there bravely, they have the closest country to them from this bloc, the usa, he please, the territory of the usa is nearby, at least with one foot. iron, but no, because he knows that they will tear it off right away, until well, in short, they are cynics and weak , absolutely weak, they showed their weakness, but weakness is a residual from soviet times, well, the territory is large, the population , this is all a dictatorship, it gives them the opportunity to hold on for a while, for a while, you can see how they are lying, that china

cannot see that they are lying, china will take them on saucers, it will be very easy to expand there in the far east right away, they saw it, they don’t need anything to do with russia, russia has sold itself completely to them, putin handed over russia to china, putin handed over russia completely, with the arctic route, with its resources, with with everything, with his minimal assets that remained in the middle east or somewhere else, in africa, he will hand everything over to china, you see, it will all remain, but i don't know if he is an agent of china. maybe they recruited him? i have the impression that the chinese could simply recruit him and as a result he works for them therefore, now there is absolutely no question about it. it is clear that china wants a bipolar world. perhaps it is easier to live this way, bearing in mind the previous period of the cold war, when this logic was applied to many countries at the time, and in principle the world was difficult, but living in