[000:00:00;00] on strengthening the security of the southern border of the united states, that all of this should be passed together, there was a senate hearing a few days ago in which secretary of state blinkin and secretary of defense austin spoke, who insisted that this is absolutely essential to the national security of the united states , that it should be taken together, because if, if anything from this package breaks out, separately, it will send a very bad signal to all the adversaries of the united states that there are some things that are less important, that are more important, and it must be taken together, and this was emphasized again yesterday by the press secretary of the white house, karin john peer, and admiral john kirby, he insisted that if the white house did not think that it was necessary to approve it in one package, he would not send one package to congress, that is, it would be best if it

were approved. in one package, and what the house of representatives passed yesterday has nothing to do with reality, because i say again, the republicans, voting for this, already knew that this bill would never become a law won't happen, and israel remains without aid like this, and ukraine remains without aid, and the newly elected speaker is playing politics like this, i can't call it anything other than politicking, please tell me if the visit of xi jinping to the united states is already being discussed states, i understand that they are to meet in the city of san francisco, and that is to take place in november, is there any talk of that and how is that going to be announced, other than that it is going to be about nuclear weapons? there is no official announcement yet, but there are rumors, there are, there are links to

sources in the white house of journalists that the visit has already been agreed, in fact, there will be... such a summit, of the pacific, asia-pacific region, to which pin should come and where, his meeting with biden should take place, well, everything is being discussed, there are various forecasts, to me, you know, it seems to me that it will resemble the meetings of soviet leaders, brezhnev actually, with american presidents, let's say. ford, carter, that is, they met, they talked about something, this, this is , so to speak, such, you know, controlled, managed, but very deep conflict, that is, managed so that it does not escalate into a hot war, although it is very important for swedenpin and biden that they can discuss economic issues, for example, the issue of trade, which is very large between the united states and china, as opposed to since the time

of the soviet union. when trade between the soviet union and the united states, well , there was, but it was very little, and how the economy of the united states is very dependent on the economy of china, because of the wrong policies that have been pursued by many administrations, after the death of mao zedong, but, but the economy of the united states is important to the economy of china, and there are a lot of contradictions, so ... they have something to discuss, they can reach some agreements, i think in this area, but in the political sphere, i think that it is unlikely, because china will not give up its desire to dominate the world, and in particular, first of all in its region, and of course the united states will not give up the fact that it will support a democratic world, support human rights, support freedoms, that is,

support freedom. world as opposed to autocracies, china is the leader of the autocratic world. mr. igor, i will ask you one more question, please tell me for your information, in your opinion, or how this author, simon schuster, the author of the article, in time, is evaluated in the united states of america, that no one believes in victory as much as i, about president zelenskyi, the state of affairs in the president's office and in ukraine, a person who, by the way, is a knight of the order presented to him by president zelenskyi, and now he is being accused of because he is allegedly pro-russian or something else, you know what you can say about this person? simon is an ordinary american journalist, one of many, not at all the most famous and popular, and he, you know, even surprised me a little, how in ukraine they perceived this, this article of his, in the magazine so, well, very painfully somehow time, simon shuster is an american, he cannot look at what is happening in ukraine

through ukrainian eyes, in principle he cannot, that is, he looks in the coordinate system in which he is there, if the president's office thought that if he were to be awarded an order, then he is, he is something. will write only in a complementary way to the address to the address, well, let's not say ukraine and the president and the president's entourage, well, it's not like that, because in the united states it is perceived in a different way, i would say that simon shuster very sincerely wishes ukraine victory and success, well, but he understands the world as he understands it, he cannot look at the world, let's say through your eyes or mine, but i look at the world, or my experience, since i grew up in the soviet union, i lived in independent ukraine, i lived in several european countries, i have lived in the united states for a long time, well, maybe, let's say , i have a broader worldview, so i am more than simon shuster, who is based on his

american experience, i think that he is a sincere person, in no way is he a moscow agent, but he, of course, he can write what ukrainians can consider, well , not in any... view, but what he writes is that in the office of the president, well, someone something said, look, american journalists keep writing that in the white house, someone said something, every day, these are all kinds of leaks, that someone said something, that someone doesn’t believe something, this is the style of journalism, it’s just normal for the united states, very much, mr. igor, igor eisenberg was with us, a professor of new york university, i wish good to you, well, it's still morning for you, yes, well, have a good day. yes, but it's already evening, we will summarize the military results of the day and week. serhiy zogrets, director of defensepress agency. sergey, congratulations. i congratulate you, vasyl, i congratulate our audience, indeed, today we will talk about what happened during the week on the front line, and what significant events should be noted,

more on that in a moment. well, so today is the day of missile troops and artillery, of course, we cannot but talk about the gods of war. sergey, how do you evaluate the work of the ukrainian artillery, and what is said now is that it is 95% an artillery war, and the war in which ukraine is currently participating against the aggressor country of the russian federation, how do you evaluate our artillery and what else do we need it was for us to burn everything around the russians, well, really, when we talk about our artillery, we should congratulate them today on their professional holiday, wish them good health, accurate shots, and we understand that 80-90% of the losses today on the battlefield, the russians are not here precisely from our artillery, which pulls the left part of the combat tasks, and a lot of interesting news, by the way, the commander of missile forces, artillery and unmanned systems appeared today, precisely unmanned systems

are now in the area of ​​responsibility of the artillery, general serhiy baranov, today announced a number of news, first of all, that ukraine has its own missile with a range 700 km. he said that there are prototypes, tests are being carried out and further tests will be carried out now and from the point of view of both range and accuracy, this is an extremely important indicator, because the appearance of such a proprietary missile or a proprietary missile complex with a range of 700 km will be such a good addition to the same atakams that we have already received, and by the way, just last week we already saw the effective use of atakams on enemy targets, and this really for... ensures the strengthening of our artillery, in addition to the appearance of our own missile, our own missile complex, another piece of news today was a video where the command of the ground forces, congratulating rocket operators on their professional

holiday, showed a video where the swedish archer howitzer was demonstrated for the first time, this howitzer is actually the most technological example that exists today... in the world, they were promised to us sometime in the summer, and now it has been demonstrated for the first time that it is already in the ukrainian armed forces, it is capable of destroying enemy targets up to 60 km away, it is actually a unique weapon for counter-battery combat, that is, we can record that that in general, our artillery is being strengthened due to supplies from partners, as well as creating our own samples, in addition to this missile system, i will mention the bohdan system, which also performs combat tasks. and serhii baranov also said that the production of its own ammunition is being deployed, he cited such indicators that currently, in the matter of providing itself with ammunition, ukraine independently covers 20% of its needs, i think

that this is so, well, very optimistic, in my opinion indicator, i do not think that this 20% will spread for ammunition there caliber 152 or 155 mm, but in any case this indicator is just as worthy of attention, that is, today we see that the artillery. is a key element for conducting hostilities and strengthening their capabilities will expand at the expense of our own defense industry and the help of our partners. now, moving on to zaluzhnyi's article, last year in september, he also wrote an article as a journalist, and this year, well, in november, he wrote an article that changed his theses, key questions, and how would you like it could analyze, well, and give an assessment even then because he is writing now, well, really, this article, or rather a series of articles, because there was an interview with the zaluzhny in the journalist, there was such an article from the economist publication itself, and so on. .. this is zaluzhnyi's vision of the technological

changes that the armed forces need in order to avoid this risk of turning to trench warfare, relatively speaking. actually, it is more about the fact that both russia and ukraine on the battlefield have reached the level where they have parity capabilities for the current time, and new technologies, in fact, make any powerful breakthroughs and assaults impossible, and that is precisely why the commander fixed several priorities that must be changed or implemented in order to once again move from this, let's say, positional war to a mobile war and ensure progress on the line front, he spoke about the fact that we first of all need superiority in the air and it is not so much manned aircraft as various unmanned systems, he spoke about the need for improved means of radio-electronic warfare, we need to strengthen the possibility of counter-battery combat, anti-mine solutions that will allow us to advance in the minefields, and actually, the fifth, but far from the last

, priority is precisely work with our reserves, having opportunities to mobilize, the main thing is to qualitatively train more people, these are all five factors , in fact, they are somewhat known, but based on the combination of these five directions, it is necessary to create such a new mix , to ensure a new symbiosis of opportunities that will allow us to outplay the enemy in comparison with the current status, where we and the russians, as valozhina believes, so far we have one dynamic parity, and neither side can achieve any success on the battlefield, which is actually demonstrated by these enemy offensives near avdiivka, where the enemy is crushed on minefields and due to the actions of our artillery, and when we try to advance in the south, we also rest on mini fields of the enemy and the work of enemy artillery, that is, now is such a period of searching for new options, and this article actually forces us to look at the war in a different way and forces our partners to review the scope,

meaning and content of the assistance that we must to get in order to ensure changes on the front line, you know, here i am, the first year of the war , when i was, i wrote a book, i made such diary entries, many things that happened, i wrote down, recorded so that, you know, it was not forgotten, and well, it was in memory, in principle and in history for people who want to remember, can take, read and have for themselves, the book is called war and we, and here it is, i will reread it now, because it will soon be published that somewhere at the beginning of december, at the end of november, at the beginning of december i quote the words of general budanov, the head of the military intelligence, he says: the war has reached a dead end, we need more weapons , a year passes, general zaluzhnyi says, in principle, the war has reached a dead end, we need more weapons, and here you know, you can think like that, well, it’s simple i'm quoting, it's not what i'm quoting, here's one quote, a year passes, the same quote, and you can be disappointed, so what's the point of all this, a year has passed, and here we are again... a dead end. how to give hope to people now,

certain motivation and understanding that a dead end and a dead end are different things. after all, we have achieved many things this year and it is impossible is to compare what is now the same as what was. i am afraid that we are now making such a mistake or a trap that europeans fall into, because the article is not written about a dead end. she says that the situation has changed. when we spoke a year ago, in a linguistic sense, we were preparing for the offensive, we had no weapons, then the soldier said, i need 300 tanks, 700 bmps and 500 artists there, of which we received about 2/3, and with that everything went on the offensive, by the way, and without planes, that is , actually under political pressure, before the need to liberate our territory, under the understanding that there is simply no other option, we then provided, we, the armed forces, the defense forces, provided the maximum of what we have, and now, relatively speaking, when we talk

about parity... a dead end , in fact, this is not a bad situation for us, taking into account the superiority of the russians, numbers , armed forces and so on, this current parity requires a new wave of reinforcement, and not just weapons, but now changes in technological solutions, in approaches to motivating people, this is also important component, and in order to ensure a new stage of hostilities, maybe it will not start from the beginning of the year, a little... later, but in any case, we are talking about the fact that we are starting to crystallize a new vision of the next stage of the war, and this is precisely what it represents, embedded in the main idea. in zaluzhny's publication, which should resonate with our partners, because they also have to fight in a different way, they told us that, relatively speaking, with this amount of weapons, according to our textbooks, you have until the end of crimea, you have to advance 30 km per day, relatively speaking, and

during this time, in four months, you could go to the crimea twice , fight there, and return, as the industrious one sarcastically says in this material, but in fact what happened, in fact, the war changed and what was a year then and a year now, including, they are fundamentally different, if the technology was in that volume, maybe the russians would not have had time to build minifields, but they built it, they created a new reality, and this reality is reflected on the requirements for the armed forces, so conditionally speaking, technique, tactics, technologies, motivation of our people, these are precisely the factors that should be taken into account by our partners and by us and by our authorities, because we understand that now, the excessive expectations that have been created, may be wrong there objections that we will reach such and such milestones there by the end of the year, now we need to reformat and create new such points of support in society and the military in order to act further, you know, i am such a precise person, i always look for quotes and

for i write them down myself when people say well, general zaluzhnyi now says that we are in such a situation, that we need to change, but why does he not say so, let's say, before the start of a full-scale offensive... there, conditionally speaking, we were told that there will be no offensive, or that nothing is happening, or not shock fists are forming, i found out for myself that in august of the 21st year, just general zaluzhnyi, he was a person whom 90% of people in ukraine in principle did not know, did not quote him and did not show him on tssn, well there or there or on stb, or on ctv, or on canales, well, they showed it on espresso, but he too in august of the 21st year, a person speaks at a forum of volunteers and says: in addition to the war in the east, a full-scale invasion awaits us and we must do this and that and that in order to ensure its very existence in principle, the person said this, again, that is when an industrious man says something, he always says it, and he spoke then and now, it’s just that now the whole country is listening to him, yes, well, volunteers and war veterans listened there then, it’s just to the fact that the industrious man is adequate in his statements and then before and now, just then again, well then the question is beside the point

comments of the president's advisers, today there is a comment by podeliak, who says that yes, we know how to build a new strategy, we need more weapons again, he diligently writes not only about weapons. as it was delivered before, precisely in the change of the very concept, approaches to the next stage of the war, that is , the creation of such a new social contract between the ukrainian population, the ukrainian authorities, the role of the military, expectations for the next year, opportunities to achieve these expectations, this is now the a difficult period that actually determines the formation of an action strategy for the next period, in order to avoid these mistakes associated with excessive expectations, have real goals and real opportunities. the achievement of these goals, this is the stage at which we are now, well, we are moving to avdiivka, i will briefly ask what the situation in avdiivka is now, well , in fact, the situation in avda, in avdiivka is difficult, i do not know anything new here i will say that starting there from the 9th, last month

, the enemy constantly increases the number of personnel in the south and in the north, conducts assault operations, changing there so. changing approaches, now during there yesterday, the day before yesterday, it was said that the enemy is trying to simply advance from the north, when we are talking about the railway and kochsokhim, some military experts, in particular yura botusov, said that the enemy crossed the railway, is trying to break through koksokhim and then there was information that the enemy was repulsed, that is, now the enemy is trying to implement this concept, which was earlier, from the north and from the south, to ensure coverage of our group and cut off logistical support, but from the 9th to the 10th, conditionally

speaking, the colossal losses of the enemy continue, the possibilities for the defense of avdiivka are preserved, taking into account the approaches that the enemy is currently taking, because those ways of advancing are known, they are difficult for the enemy in view of the work of our artillery, and the question is that, on the one hand, there were resources for defense, but resources are such a component that, in principle, indicates that we have the ability to maintain this section of the front, the main thing is to make the right management decisions, although some things there surprise me , that is on the air of our channel, one of the soldiers said that for a moment, the security of the coke plant did not allow the ukrainian military to enter the coke plant, i was extremely surprised by this, today i already see that our soldiers really work there at the coke plant this is one of the important such lines that can be used to destroy the enemy, so the situation under avdiyivka is... so, well , complicated, but the management decision, reserves, timely adoption of relevant decisions - this is what

allows you to restrain the russian influx, to cause damage to the enemy, and to continue to use this section of the front as a zone where the enemy loses manpower and equipment, we have five minutes left, but it is short based on the results of the counteroffensive for five months, because the counteroffensive is evaluated based on that the failure should be ordered to someone, or the head of the operational-strategic forces, who was responsible for it or someone else, or even talked about it , friends and acquaintances ask me there, they write, well, they think that journalists should all know, even more so, i i am sitting next to zergius with gurts, i definitely have they say, vasyl, what kind of alkaline is being removed, i say for what, well, what kind of counteroffensive, then explain, this is a victory, this is normal work that is far from finished, this is a failure, no, well, we started our conversation with that , that we admit that the situation on the battlefield has changed, that the enemy's line of defense has changed , that he... has saturated the defense with personnel and fortifications, the realities have changed, and the

tasks that, speaking intelligently, he set, well, in particular, when oleksandr ternavskyi spoke about that the minimum task is to go out to tokmak, it is now 19 km to tokmak in 4 months, since the beginning of the offensive, we went within 10 km and even to tokmak 19, taking into account the enemy’s fortifications, even if we now see it there on the map, when we talk about the works there, we they prepared an infographic there, then we see that we are trying to expand this wedge into the defense that the enemy is currently receiving, we have a width of 10-12 kilometers there, the depth of the wedge is within 10 km and the enemy holds this section of the front sufficiently, yes that we cannot , given our tactics, provide fast

a breakthrough, so the situation on the front line is partly a reflection of those publications, those statements made by valery zaluzhnyk, explaining that now we have entered such a certain stalemate, when on both sides we have a certain parity of capabilities and have similar technologies , which make quick breakthroughs impossible, as said by the quick breakthrough expert. it won't happen yet, but it is necessary to create prerequisites for this, it is necessary to continue to put pressure on the enemy and further, including destroying his enemy's strength and equipment, it is the same one of the components of our offensive actions, because if we sit on the defensive, the enemy will not react to us and we cannot then, conditionally speaking, provoke him to counterattack, which we can then use to destroy the enemy, so now conditionally speaking , offensive actions continue, they continue in the format of not, broadly ... large-scale maneuver actions there, namely in the format of a strike with missile and artillery weapons, i think that this

tactic is unlikely to change in the coming months, and at the same time we we have to prepare for next year's strategy, which will take into account the wishes expressed by zaluzhny in his vision related to the new stage of military operations, we have literally two minutes, i briefly, you know, wrote in the art of war that attacks on the enemy there , where he is not waiting, kherson oblast or it could be the place that is currently in information silence in such and such a bubble of information silence, where the enemy did not wait and where there may be much more successful actions, well, the enemy is already waiting, because relatively speaking , we they have already started that there are about five such bridgeheads that are controlled by our troops, there is such a large gray area, there are prerequisites for continuing to destroy the enemy's forces and equipment, the enemy is trying to relocate his troops there to balance the new threat , changed the commander there , but in any case, this part of the front is dangerous for the enemy, and we

, our armed forces, must preserve, relatively speaking, this threat and, against the background of such a foggy war, implement any options that will be able to ensure defeat the enemy or the destruction of his personnel and equipment, which is actually happening on the left bank of the dnieper due to the actions of our marines. well, let's wish. i will, of course, once again call on the armed forces of ukraine to support the zsubs, as one soldier at the front said, i recently watched a video where he said that if it were not for volunteers and people, then we would be euphemistically bad, i will say this, so we support zsu, they believe in us, we believe in them, despite everything, despite all this pain, thank you sergey, thank you vasyl, thank you to our viewers. thousands of people were forced to leave their homes since february 22 and seek shelter in safer

communities, one of them was opishnya, in poltava oblast, our correspondent anna morozova heard the story of escaping from shelling and learned how the arrivals in poltava oblast were accommodated and socialized, let's see, they took two bags with them and came, because the city is being shelled, the child was very afraid, she was crying, she wanted to leave where there is no war, we did not want to go abroad, zina gud, a messenger from kostyantynivka, there from her whole life was spent by her family and parents. in april 2022, we were forced to leave the house, everything is sad, everything is destroyed, in general , there is a war, this is here, thank god, i hope it will not be affected, since our parents have already returned home after that, because there was a very large the influx of immigrants made it very difficult to find housing, they found salvation in the opishnyatka community, here i got a job in a children's creativity center, my daughter

went to school, a very good team, very good... girls i like very much, that's how you go to work with with pleasure, the child goes to my place here, does all sorts of classes and dances, and she goes to music school, she is 9 years old, she also likes it, she has found a lot of friends, she even says, i don’t want anymore, she says go home, i have a lot here friends when the green corridors were opened, the community had to quickly develop social and medical spheres for idps. our community has a small future. in the first place, since we have a school here and there are many of them, in principle there are also limited ones it is necessary to come to them both in the colt and in the circle, because it cannot stand up, in general, more than 2,200 internally displaced persons have arrived in the opishnyat community, says its head. people are most in need of humanitarian aid, regarding work, we have a program, we created a council of idps, yesterday they

met for the first time, several internally displaced persons. we employed opishnya blagoustrii, including opishnya agro, in our communal enterprise, and the displaced people want to go home and are waiting for their cities to be liberated by the armed forces of ukraine. anna morozova, bohdan proskurov from poltava for the tv channel. well, we still have a lot of interesting things ahead of us, ahead of the second hour of the great ethereum, firstly, we will have a conversation with experts about whether it is legal or illegal to hold elections during the martial law in ukraine. and do they think about it in the office of the president world during the war with yuri fizer, the economic results of the week with oleksandr morchivka, sport and with yevhen pasthov, and the weather from natalka didenko, what will the weather be like for the weekend, it’s all waiting for you, well, now news, the most important thing for this hour. three men were injured by enemy fire. in the afternoon, the russians shelled the central part of kherson, the head of the military administration, roman morochko, said. all the wounded were hospitalized,

they were outside during the attack. the government calls for it. people to respond to alarms and stay in shelters. locals write that there was a direct hit at the russian soldiers, in the temporarily occupied volnovas, something flew into the so-called building of culture of railway workers, according to the advisor of the mayor of mariupol petro andryushchenko, there is no culture there does not smell the occupiers are panicking on the ground, details of the attack are being clarified. in... but in less than a day, the police in kharkiv found the person who damaged the floor mats near the historical museum, he turned out to be a 45-year-old man from kharkiv, the man vandalized cultural monuments with an ax. he explained his act by the fact that he was just being hooligan, the figures of polovtsian women, these are gravestone statues, stone statues dating back to the 19th century, they were transported to kharkiv from the izyum district after the de-occupation of the region. currently, the sculptures are being restored

avoid additional damage due to precipitation. volodymyr zelenskyy appointed a new commander of the special operations forces of the armed forces of ukraine. serhii lupanchuk is a bettor. the relevant statement was published on the president's website. by another decree, zelsky dismissed from this position generalmar viktor horrenka, who had been the commander of the special operations forces since july 22. three people died. another person was injured in a traffic accident in the zaporizhzhia district. according to rescuers , a car and a truck collided. emergency personnel had to. to block the victim and the bodies of the dead from the mutilated car, and the cause of the terrible, terrible car wreck is currently being investigated. house arrest, this is the preventive measure chosen by the court-director of the enterprise that appropriated 2 million hryvnias. detectives of the bureau of economic security discovered that he concluded an agreement with the military administration on the supply of meat products in the amount of uah 35 million, but he did not