from the grd have the right to ask questions to the candidates. the co-coordinator of the council, nika kreidenkova, assures: any pressure on the members of the grd from the judges or members of the qualification commission evaluated by them is impossible. grdd does everything and there will definitely be no agreements with the judges or not, because each of gerd's chuvans has gathered here to clean up the judiciary. and we have worked out a number of procedures to exclude any as much as possible. personal communication of the members of the grd with the judges who are evaluated within the limits of the assessment or competition. in particular, one of those there mechanisms, we never communicate in person, but only through official mail, by an impersonal letter, signed by the co-coordinators. one of the requirements for ukraine as a candidate for joining the european union is the effective continuation of judicial reform, and this in particular depends on the public integrity council, because in fact the council is the chairman. a public body that signals and

draws attention to the non-compliance of a judge or a candidate for the position with the criteria of professionalism and integrity, and taking into account the professionalism of the composition of the state administrative court, doubts in there is no transparency of future tenders. and that's all for today, if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see in exactly one week, you have a runny nose, immediately spray deflu silver, de flu silver - a silver circle of resistance against viruses and bacteria, there are discounts on deflu silver spray, 20% in pharmacies, plantain, bam and savings. a cold, there are discounts on rezystol 15 in

the psyllanyk, pam and oskad pharmacies. events, events happening right now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but it is not enough to know what is happening, it is necessary to understand. antin borkovskii and invited experts soberly assess the events, analyze them by modeling our future, every saturday at 1:00 p.m., repeated at 10:00 p.m. studio zahid with anton borkovsky at espresso. vasyl winter's big broadcast. two hours of air time, two hours of your time, two hours to learn about the war and what the world is about. two hours to keep up with economic and sports news. two hours in the company of your favorite presenters, presenters, what to many they became like relatives, as well as honored guests of the studio. events of the day. in two hours,

vasyl zima's big broadcast, a project for smart and caring people, in the evening at espresso. the war in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians. wins and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics. serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this. people who have information and shape public opinion. people who defend ukraine and create the future right now. the main and interesting thing is in the verdict program. with serhii rudenko, from monday to friday, at 20:00, well, we leave it as it is, we want it so, and why did you make such a decision, thank you, the position of the committee, dear colleague, we leave it, to the extent that there is one simple reason, that

a significant debt burden on local budgets can lead to that they may not be able to repay these debts, during martial law, so the logic is simple, just so as not to burden local budgets with those expenses that they will not be able to cover later, thank you, thank you, it was the 69th and 70th amendments , 71 aleksiychuk, does not insist with colleagues, 72 oleksiychuk z colleagues do not insist, oleksiychuk and colleagues do not insist, 74th, yes, tymoshenko and colleagues are here, i understand, soboliv 10 minutes instead of all the amendments you have, yes, serhii vladyslavovich, please, up to 10 minutes soboliv. dear colleagues, i would like to present the arguments on the basis of which we actually made all the amendments and organize them into several key positions. position number one, on even if the committee calculated everything

down to the penny and believes that these funds will go without theft, through open tender procedures, there is a question. in the following: cities, urban communities and mayors of cities have absolutely clearly calculated everything until the end of the year, and the fact that you are doing this, i am not saying in hindsight, which is prohibited in principle by the constitution from october 1, and this is exactly what remains in your project , and in the re-introduction you did not take that into account, although it was one of the key reservations, but even to take these funds before the end of the year... in my opinion, this means leaving communities without those key finances that go directly to the repair of sewage, water and others

urgent constructions that will not allow the cities to enter the winter calmly, so if you think that you are already doing it, but at least consider then the edits that relate to... the first thing is that it cannot be retroactively introduced from 1 october, but it cannot be included in this year's budget, because the remaining months , these funds have long been pledged, these funds are pledged on a financial basis, without which, as you know, no work will be carried out, and this is the first and key an amendment we insist that in no case these funds shall not from...' retroactively and not to take them this year, this is the first and absolutely logical amendment. second, we took data from your official reporting committee and the ministry of finance, what financial resource you want to get as a result of this operation.

if we assume that for the next year it is about 100 billion of money, then this means that for this quarter: you plan to receive about 25 billion. i don't know if you got the data from the association of mayors, which there is such data, or from each city , only as of today , cities have spent, i emphasize, directly preparation, transfer of funds, financing, direct financing of the armed forces, initially... war, about 60 million hryvnias. and all this is confirmed by the estimates, which are approved at the sessions and which are very easy to check. second, about 30 billion urban communities paid

for indirect support of the armed forces, how much the communities spent, and this is actually tens of billions across ukraine. to support families. who died while people were waiting for help from the state, the cities paid out a million hryvnias to each deceased family, the cities paid out hundreds of thousands to those who lost limbs, to those families who were left with children without a breadwinner, you took into account these funds, which went, including this year, for all these payments, and now? you retroactively want to withdraw in one month and do not give the opportunity to use these funds until the end of the year. in our opinion, this is the second group of amendments that require unequivocal consideration, if you are already taking this

unprecedented step, for the next year, you must take into account the funds that went into it, the third group of rules, we are a miracle, i would like to you listened well, i'm not talking to a wall. colleagues, the third group of the right: you know, it is great that the bdf will be taken, including from paramilitary formations that are not currently at the front, but who live in these cities and towns, these are policemen and other paramilitary formations, their families live in these cities, their children study in these schools, in kindergartens. this goes directly to providing all necessary needs of the city. how can these funds be taken from the city with the understanding that these people continue to live in these cities. the fourth norm that needs immediate settlement. these people have been around before

paid this tax to the city. you know this very well, nothing has changed, absolutely, they... this tax was a year, and two, and three years ago, yes, there were certain cities, such as the city of kyiv, or, for example, in the zaporizhia region now, unfortunately, the tragedy is occupied... radar , who had excess profits from this tax, had deductions for them, but what has changed, these taxes continue to be paid, and these families continue to live in these cities and towns . how can you not take this into account? if you already assume that all military personnel are obliged to transfer their pdf to the central budget. how could it not be taken into account by you as the budget committee of the ministry of finance or the cabinet of ministers.

the fifth norm, which in my opinion is the most important in this situation, what should those who started with the funds that were already allocated, they were not divided, when it was the city or town budget, it was the only financial resource, they were spent , yes, directly those needs that are necessary for the city, well, you can’t mark the hryvnia that this hryvnia for the previous 10 months came from the pdf of the military, and this the hryvnia came from someone else, these are the general needs of the city, which must be taken into account one way or another, the next one, this is already a moral component, please tell me what is easier to control, a negligent mayor who uses... funds that go as additional fees from

pdf of the military and servicemen and related professions, whether it is easier to control the finance minister or the prime minister, and it is clear that if the military returning from the front, god forbid, whole and healthy, and god forbid, with mutilations , which are not at all are returning, and their family will tear apart such a mayor , and we know such examples, who will allow himself to use funds that should have gone to help military families, someone will come to the office of the minister of finance, you are waiting for this, or someone will come to the office of the prime minister the prime minister, who has absolutely no control over anything, and he sees perfectly well what is happening, and only today's minister of defense, finally. understood within absolutely reasonable limits what should be done with procurement for the army, creating a special agency with

appropriate control and other functions, this is also a question of whether the community controls these funds, whether these funds are controlled by someone else, whether it is possible to control what you will now do with those 5-10 billion that were used by the previous ministry of defense for the wrong purpose... or at inflated prices, so what, we have determined what's next , so our position is as follows: if you take into account the key amendment , which is about not going back from october 1, and taking this into account in the next year's budget, it opens a completely normal path to negotiations, and then there is a whole order

amendments that relate to where exactly these funds can be used by communities and city mayors, then there is a logic, we are ready to support this logic, and so you actually leave the cities in the autumn-winter period, at will, perfectly understanding what a resource you have bridge selection, so if the committee wanted real work, you had plenty of time. you have seen all the amendments that were made in order to really approach how to solve this issue, thank you, thank you, serhii vladyslavovich, yes, this speech instead of all the amendments that colleagues from the faction left you, thank you, 75 and savrrasov, no, no, he does not insist , 76 krulko, he does not insist, 77, purtovo does not insist, 78, mykysha, he does not insist, and you are there, because you simply moved, i apologize

, please, mykysha, 78, thank you, ruslan oleksiyovych, according to the fact that we should speak in corrections, and it may seem that we are moving away from the topic, all my corrections and everything i say, they are combined, and i explain, why is it written that way, even if it is suggested to change the comma, and i explain all this in the corrections, and the corresponding correction, it about the national research fund, the only fund, probably in ukraine, which works effectively with grants, providing support for scientific and scientific and technical activities to all its direct participants, has been working for more than the first year, and works effectively for... i suggest what to do, they are completely independent, they work independently, they have their own accounting, but the funds are through the ministry of education , science, why, why do you depend on a fund that is independent and works efficiently, dependence on the relevant ministry, which they are supervised, why do it, let's make them completely independent and let them

manage their own funds, the position of the committee is short, dear colleague. as of today, i would like to inform you, appropriate conditions have been created for ensuring the activities of the national research fund, which means that the expenditures for the provision of activities, the national fund for and provision of grant support, are annually provided for in the state budget as part of the expenditures of mon, as you correctly noted, for a separate budget program, therefore, at the same time, we draw attention to the fact that during formation of indicators of the draft state budget for the 24th year, the proposal from mon to designate the nfd as the main manager of budget funds was not received, therefore this amendment was rejected. thank you. thank you, 79th, mykysha, please vote, yes, i am putting to the vote the 78th amendment, authored by mykysha and a colleague, it was rejected by the committee, please vote.

for 32 decisions have not been made, please, mykysha 79, please, colleagues, again, probably another approach to the destruction of regional commissions of the state regional development fund, well, let's make a huge please for regional development, for local self-government, and in general for regional politics, let's remove this corruption link, that's what the amendment is about and it says that this component should be eliminated, removed in general, there are also these amendments, it is clearly explained what the mechanism will be, instead , it will be effective and will not create an additional burden on the ministry of development of communities, territories, and infrastructure, as some of its representatives say, a simple, clear, clear

algorithm and mechanism, how will it work now these commissions, without... regional commissions, and it will work, and it will be easy, understandable for any community, and we will not lose anything, on the contrary, we will gain only from this, colleagues, please, the 79th amendment, authorship of mika, colleagues, the committee rejected it, please vote. for 34 no decision has been made 80 the rascal does not insist 80 the first mother does not insist 82 the frieze does not insist 83 we have already passed the mazurash 84 krulko does not insist 85 alexiyev does not insist 86 petrunyak does not insist but razumkov please 86 please ruslan oleksiyovych

86 93 95 there are three identical amendments, give me two minutes, please, please, two minutes, dear colleagues, i don't see something about those people's deputies who said a lot that they want to talk and listen, fundamental amendments to this bill, somewhere they evaporated, there is no , yes, well, nothing, the state will lose nothing, the amendments relate to fixing the revenues of the general fund of the budget of rural settlements , urban territorial communities in the amount of 64% at the level of... the code. i know it's actually partially done by this draft law, i have a question, why are we again observing double approaches with you, why do you take into account the amendments of the monomajority, and the amendments of the reasonable policy, which

were actually earlier than the representatives of the monomajority, they probably, well, then saw it, decided to submit it on your own, you did not take into account, i think that it would be correct if they were all taken into account, if they are identical, if they are correct, or here we have politics again , you have politics in all your draft laws , there is no logic, but there is politics, you are not at all planned to take them into account later were forced to do it, but you and i are either about the result or about playing, you see, and this is exactly what you are doing, explain to me why this amendment is rejected. all three, what is the fundamental difference from what was taken into account in the other amendments, and i would like to hear your position as a representative of the committee,

not yours personally, thank you, please, what is the position of the committee on these amendments, dear colleague, you are absolutely correct noted that it was noted that the amendments were taken into account, which provide for 64% of receipts to local budgets from the pdf of the military, it was taken into account the amendment number 729 and 1394 with the mandate to provide in the law on the state budget for the 24th year, the corresponding changes in the regulations for the enrollment of the pdf, which was done by the ministry of finance, so you, these amendments have already been taken into account with the collegial by the committee's decision 729 and 1394. thank you, thank you, let's move on, dear colleagues, 87 oleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist, 88 oleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist. 89 kiselevsky does not insist, 90 aleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist, 91 - tymoshenko has already spoken, 92

bondar does not insist, 94 shulyak does not insist, 90 the sixth, bezgin and his colleagues do not insist, 97 lazynskyi does not insist, 98 mama does not insist, 99 fries does not insist, sota mazurasho has already spoken, 101 krulko has already spoken. 102 bonddar does not insist, 103 kiselyevsky does not insist, 104 oleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist, 105, oleksiychuk and colleagues do not insist, 106 oleksiychuk and colleagues do not insist, 107 tymoshenko and colleagues spoke, 108 oleksiyev does not insist, 109 lezinsky does not insists, 110 bhiin does not insist, 111-th mykysha, either please, 111 mike, thank you, ruslan oleksiyovych, look what this correction is about, it's two. an important amendment, so important that there is even a separate draft law 9559, what is in it and what are the corresponding amendments, what we are asking,

not even asking, we are demanding that we add, so that the local self-government can freely provide, in addition to financial, also material support for the defense security sector, now for this there will be responsibility for local self-government, we propose that this responsibility remove, because since 24.02 all the majority, the vast majority of communities helped the armed forces, helped guru, sbu, other military units, and for this they will now be held responsible, we propose that such responsibility should not be in the future, and this amendment is also about it says colleagues, please support it, it is very important for local self-government. will be the position of the committee, briefly, colleagues in this amendment propose to supplement the expenditures of local budgets with expenditures for the support of the security and defense sector, but in general such

direct expenses are the function and authority of the state, and from the state budget. at the same time, i would like to point out that the code contains norms that determine the mechanisms for transferring funds in local budgets for relevant measures. thank you. thank you, mykysha's 11th amendment, with my colleagues, the committee rejected it, please vote. for 29, the decision has not been made, 112 the mother does not insist, 113 aleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist, 114th aleksiychuk and his colleagues do not insist, 115 the same authors do not insist, 116- keselevsky does not insist, 117 fries does not insist, 118 the mother does not insist , 19 frieze no insists, 120th aleksiychuk does not insist, 121st oleksiichuk and colleagues do not insist, 122 aleksiychuk and colleagues

do not insist, 123- kiselyevsky, does not insist, 124, kiselyevsky does not insist, 125th, yuzhannina, please, nina petrivna, please , i have 18 amendments, 10 were before the first, second reading and eight before... i read for 10 minutes instead of 18 amendments. that is, instead of all your corrections, 10 minutes. please, nina petrovna , instead of all her amendments, 10 minutes of speech. please. dear colleagues, i wanted to would, so that we respect each other, and yet, i now perceive the consideration of these amendments as parliamentary hearings. but this was done before the government registered this draft law. we did not have numbers and. and did not have enough information to draw conclusions on, say, even when considering the first reading of this draft law, but today we have received enough information from

places and have a complete picture of what the perception looks like and what local authorities do during a large-scale war . i think you are colleagues we also received all the appeals and a broad transcript of the association of cities of ukraine, where they gave full information about how much was received by the pdf from local budgets, how much was spent on direct funding for the military and on other expenses, and i am absolutely ashamed for us that during the terrible first months of war, large-scale, you did not ask them, but how do you liquidate the destroyed objects, how do you help people and how do you ensure their accommodation, where do you find that resource both physically and financially, in order to

to eliminate the terrible consequences and society would continue to live with faith in our victory, it was not you who did the central government, you did not even think then how it is, in what situation the communities are on the ground and where they find the resources so that everything it is up to them to decide, and they did it correctly, because these are the consequences of decentralization, because they are responsible for making communities feel that there is local leadership, and it is not necessary for them to go to... and ask for a penny on every occasion, because we have to do something, well, it's great, it united us country, we were all on the same breath, that is, we all did everything possible from each of us in order to respond faster to arrivals, to repair infrastructure objects faster, and the truth is, they did not ask, but where is the subsidy for these goals from the state budget,

spent funds from local budgets. and it is a pity that during these few weeks, when we were preparing for the second one, we were not able to listen even to the frontline regions. the frontline regions are of key importance for us today, you asked kharkiv how they are tomorrow they will survive without this money, well, how can we take such steps without understanding the consequences, huge consequences for the regions. i, it seems to me that in this appeal of the association of cities it is more than exhaustively written that the regions spent at least 77% of the military pdp, this is not only assistance to the security and defense forces, this is the provision of idps, this is the clearing and restoration of buildings and infrastructure destroyed by explosions , it's getting hospitals, it's help.

servicemen, this is the reconstruction of destroyed housing in communities, we do not see no movements from any central funds, these are only local budgets, besides , they emphasize, but what about you, with your government resolution dated 1.06.23.547, you obliged them to provide free meals to 1,640 people, for which 28.7 billion of the funds should go. but no funding from the state budget was provided. therefore, this is a key issue. we did not hear local self-government. shame and don't hide, please, that these funds are needed for the armed forces. i told you that if 77% was spent anyway, not directly for the support of the armed forces and for overcoming consequences, so what more do you want? and the association.

cities and all communities asked us with such an appeal that if you see and see dishonest mayors, by the way, well, it's ugly to organize these rallies, bribing activists, to dance near city councils and say things about asphalt, about burkivka, if you are actually the government, do it the rules of the security and defense budget for local authorities, provide for exceptional expenses that must be spent from funds, from local budgets in order to ensure the goals that you set before yourself, and then we will see more time of unification of the country. our responsibility is shared, we all have to work for victory, that's for sure. as for our amendments, i don't understand why the budget committee didn't pay attention to not just counting...