to be exactly 2,328,670 units of tangible property. so what else can be said? this is already a direct, direct threat to the supply of the military, that again in the winter they will be without winter uniforms, again there will be troubles, without supplies to the military units. and what is interesting, we again hear nothing about claims from the ministry of defense to these suppliers, now i will be very grateful if the new composition of the ministry of defense, after carefully reading this report, they will really express claims to those who do not supply us with uniforms for the military parts, and you know what's interesting, we in principle, normal people understand.

how did it happen, why have more than two million sets of military uniforms not yet arrived in parts, despite a one hundred percent or almost one hundred percent advance payment, and it turned out that our suppliers of military uniforms became construction companies, which in the 21st, in the 20th, in the 22nd years, something was being built for the ministry of defense. i certainly do not want to weigh in, but it seems to me that it is no coincidence that the construction companies of the ministry of defense, which were its contractors, became urgent suppliers of military uniforms, and of course most of them did not supply it, or supplied it at inflated prices, but any reasonable person, at the level of common sense, will immediately understand that most likely they called and said, well, we are with you... already there

everything was rolled back by the schematics, and let’s try the form again, who said, of course we will try, and the billions of money that the army currently lacks went exactly there, and this report shows all this, which i also wanted to pay attention to , you know, in this law, when you collect pdf from local budgets, be careful read the experts' conclusions, but in front of me right now we have very carefully prepared the conclusion of the main legal department of the verkhovna rada of ukraine for this meeting, and it says: okay, you decided to take pdfatok on the income of individuals from the local government and transfer it to the central level, but colleagues, it turned out , that in accordance with the requirements of clause 168/5 of article 168 of the tax code of ukraine, the amount of tax on individuals withheld

from financial support, monetary rewards and other payments received by police officers, private persons the senior staff of the state criminal enforcement service of ukraine, the state fire guard, civil defense bodies and units , as well as persons defined by the law of ukraine on social and legal protection of servicemen and family members, parents, dependents of a deceased serviceman, during the performance of duties employees, during their service, that is, if this money is received, then it must be, according to the law, directed exclusively to the payment of equivalent or full compensation for the loss of income of this category citizens, in the event that they are injured, for god's sake they died and so on, even things like that... they were in such a hurry to withdraw money for

corruption schemes that they did not even take this into account, this issue was submitted to the committee on social policy in our country. the next story is very important, yesterday i returned from the city of khmelnytskyi, where we met with representatives of european solidarity, with deputies of local councils, from the entire khmelnytskyi region, you know, we talked very carefully with them. what is happening with pddfo, what with how to do it? everyone came to the opinion that the military pdf, and this is for a moment next year, it will be somewhere around 96 billion hryvnias, should be directed almost entirely to the needs of security and defense. but do people believe that when it is aimed at the central level of government, it will be.

was actually used to help the armed forces and other formations that protect ukraine, no, no one believes in this, and ordinary people do not believe in this, and when they started talking, you know, the mechanisms were clearly understood, european solidarity supports them, no less than 20%, now you have 10 pledged, should go directly to the accounts of the brigades, the rest, if you are talking about drones and desty, okay, we have already said many times that we consider this mechanism to be imperfect, it is systemically wrong, but it is working. the mechanism, at least, it looks like a working mechanism, in order for us to significantly increase the supply of drones to our defenders , and representatives of the dst, the management of the dst,

and representatives of the ministry of digital came to us and we really talked with them about this, there is a problem , is problems, but nevertheless, i want to believe that this mechanism will work. as for the ministry of strategic industry, we submitted a lot of amendments so that the money does not go there, but goes to the ministry of defense, and with clear, specific directions, some for the purchase of weapons abroad, some for the purchase of weapons from the national manufacturer, because this is very important , even in this difficult situation that exists today, but a part must remain in the territories, must remain in the communities, and it is used by them, where is used, you will say, a very clear list in european solidarity , this list was provided, first, for the equipment

of bomb shelters, do not buy drums there, as representatives of the administration did in kyiv , ruslan oleksiy stefanchuk agrees with me. but on the drums, excuse me, these processes were launched by the head of the administration, whose certificate bears the signature of mr. zelenskyi, and who was appointed to the position by mr. zelenskyi, but as for the real equipment, it is so that in this bomb shelter, excuse me, people could to stay, secondly, it is for the equipment of defensive positions, because one of the moments that still surprises us, from the 14th to the 19th, and in the east and in the south, three lines of defense were being built, three, you remember that then the war was stopped at a long distance, at

a long distance from kyiv, but starting from the 19th year, and unfortunately, even starting from february 24, fortifications. as it is necessary and in such quantity as it is necessary, unfortunately it is not being built, and this is very wrong, this is the second point where local communities can spend, and the third very serious point , i would say the restoration of critical infrastructure , well, let's be honest, i constantly communicate with the mayors of the east and south, and with many others, for example, in the west of the country. so, yesterday in khmelnytskyi, the representative of the city council of slavuta really told us about the situation that happened there, when you know, not a single surviving school, not a single surviving kindergarten, more than

one and a half thousand damaged houses, you know what they said yesterday, this happened yesterday , what if, as the office wanted the president and the servant of the people, the pdf was withdrawn from october 1, then they would not have had the physical opportunity, after this blow, to convene a session of the city council and urgently allocate money for the restoration of at least schools and kindergartens, and they did it and they have these there was money, if it went from october 1, as you wanted, then sorry, it was not, and the key front areas. there is kharkiv, this year they will lose more than 700 million uah, next year more than 3 billion 600 million uah, and they need to recover, instead of supporting front-line communities should approach

this issue in a differentiated way, and for example, not to touch at least the pdf, the military pdf of those communities that are on the front line today, kramatorsk, 600 million will lose us. year, for which today they change windows, patch roofs, restore heat supply, restore electricity, you take it from them. instead, you say to them, as they say, come to kyiv, my dear, it has already happened, it has already happened, it was the same under yanukovych, and it seems to me that mr. zelsky really wants to wear yanukovych's laurels, that's why that if the mayor does not have money and the city council does not have money, and they are told, we will throw you out of kyiv, we already know how these processes will be built, the mayors will come.

in reality, colleagues already talked about this today, they will be divided into mayors who are with us and mayors who are not with us, and to give money to certain mayors and not to certain ones, but the key issue of decentralization was not in this, in the independence of local power, in the independence and capacity of communities, and by destroying this under the guise of war, you are destroying decentralization, which is a key principle, a key element, i mean the capacity of the communities of the european union, and if you think that in europe they do not see it, then they see it, they see it, and they make these remarks, we heard this today and the grateful presidents of the european commission, we are sure and now we are holding on for us to get this decision, but excuse me, when... these negotiations start, these 35 directions are always with me now, always with

me, and one of the directions there is decentralization and support of local communities, and we have to pay attention to that , now the next one the item i would like to talk about, you say that there is no money in the state, let's take local money, and here, dear ukrainians, i want to tell you that a couple of weeks ago in this very hall, despite the opposition's opposition, a vote was taken draft law 1038 on changes to the budget of the 23rd year, here it is, in it, in addition to the fact that more than 300 million hryvnias were really fairly allocated for the needs of the security and defense sector, they openly spread their pockets in directions that do not concern the security sector at all and defense more than 10 billion. now you are going to

take 96 from local authorities next year. i have already found 10 for you. and where were they taken? and they were taken for the salaries of officials in the ministries. and investigative journalists wrote about it. they were taken for awards to officials in the ministries. and one of the points in general surprised me about the improvement of the maintenance of russian prisoners of war, if i am not mistaken, 91 million million hryvnias, we see that they are with us, with our soldiers who are captured, everyone has forgotten the fawn, but it must be remembered, and you are doing it now, i i think it is wrong when you say that there is no money in the state, could this have been prevented, of course, does the ministry need this money, of course not, the ministry of finance, and i am grateful, now we have a deputy minister in this hall

, this is very nice, because very often the representatives of the ministry ignore their bills, well, they think, and they will vote that way, so the ministry of finance has additionally requested, if i am not mistaken, 272 million for salaries there or payments, despite the fact that they have not used for salaries and payments, there were another 252. a simple human question arises, why do you take money when you cannot effectively use the ones you have, the same situation with the ministry of ecology, one to one, they have unused ones, more 80, and they are asking for another 40, you know, an incomprehensible story, an incomprehensible situation, now, that is , to what i am simply leading this, to the fact that someone says that there is no money in the state. if it is reasonable to approach the state budget, then they are there, that is 10 billion only in changes until the 23rd year,

besides that, why did you spend the entire year, you, the president’s office, you, the central government , you, zelensky’s team, centrally spending money on new roads, pothole repair and everything, bridges and everything, but i’m sorry, you’re not building new roads, you’re in it blame the local authorities. but the local authorities did much less than you centrally. what can we talk about if the paving stones were moved in the government quarter near the cabinet of ministers. why did you do that? during the war, when the money could buy drones, the money could be bought ammunition now the following. when you pick up a pdf, what is it about? personal income tax. the person lived in the community, he joined

the armed forces of ukraine today as a volunteer or as a result of mobilization. but her family, wife, mother, father, children remained in this same community, but the person no longer pays vat there, he pays where his military unit is registered, and a very simple question arises, how to compensate for this where the family lives , and compensated in such a way that this community started, where everywhere, but in many in some cases, to receive pdf from military units, which, in turn, were based in the settlement from where this volunteer left or was mobilized to the army, and this in some way compensated and was enough money to help the families and help the families of the deceased and help the community's life activities in order to , so that the families

of those who are at the front, they do not sit without heat, do not sit without gas or electricity, today you take it away, and tomorrow the community will not have money to restore electricity very quickly, very quickly restore heat supply and so on, do you think the military will be satisfied with this? there is a systemic solution , many experts have talked about it, so that vat is paid not at the place of registration of the company where the person works, or at the place of registration of the military unit, but that vat is paid at the place of registration itself. of a person, i.e. by place, remember registrations, but there are no registrations in ukraine at the moment, by place of registration, this is one of the very systematic options, but now that they have basically done you a favor and sent this draft law for a second second reading, you had to differentiate the communities and yes, direct the cepyphon to exclusively

the needs of defense security, excluding front-line communities, excluding front-line communities and excluding those where there is, let's say, a large number of military units. the second question, very interesting, is now the speed of communication and the speed of receiving money, we also talked about this yesterday in the film office, between the local authorities and the military unit is, well, from three to five weeks at most, this is transparent taking into account, taking into account these procedures , this at most, sometimes even faster, this means that the military unit comes with its needs, sends a letter, the local government transparently goes out and transfers money, whether services are needed, whether units of goods are needed in the military unit, at the central

level you know how long the transit period is between asking and receiving something? at best 3-4 months, that's at best if everything is good and everything goes smoothly. you understand that today speed is the equivalent of saving people's lives, but yesterday, you know, i advise you very much to all people's deputies to constantly go to the people on the ground, as they say, in a figurative sense, to constantly go to military units, with the military, it's a simple question, you say, we will direct 10% of the funds of the military pddfo directly to the accounts of the brigades, okay, well - first, it is not enough, we need not 10, but 20, and this is the strict position of european solidarity, 20% directly to the accounts of the brigades, but here is a simple

question that was discussed yesterday, you know that volunteers still have a lot of suvs, pickups, jeeps , in military units, and not always these military units put them on the register, for many reasons, they cannot be there, it is now impossible to do it in the military unit, and the question arises, how to refuel them, how to repair them, how , for example, to repair or restore the drones that the volunteers deliver, and which are not put into service or are not registered with the military unit, they are actually used, now it is done very quickly and simply the local community makes sure that both diesel fuel and spare parts go to the urgent military unit and it

uses it. if you pick up the pdf from local councils, in local communities and send it to the official military unit, then tomorrow all the volunteer suvs will be, will you again put the fuel supply on the shoulders of... volunteers, and as for this, i have given you only one example of that that the system does not work, it was necessary to approach it more thoughtfully. the next stage is indifferent, you say that the local government is a cobblestone, it is ours. only sufficiency is not for the armed forces, but dear ukrainians, i want you to know, and these are colleagues from various factions of the groups have already stated that only in the 23rd

year without any law, local communities directed more than uah 60 billion to the needs of the security and defense sector, and there are communities that direct even more than they receive from the military pdf. let's take poltava oblast, for example, the opishnyan community received a military pddfo from the beginning of the 23rd year, that is, a personal income tax from the military of less than 20 million, at the same time , about 60 million uah were directed to support the armed forces of ukraine, and they do not want to stop, they want come out to the amount of approximately 90 million uah, because they understand. today is a cause that must be supported above all, today the armed forces and the military must be supported above all.

the next story concerns local communities, i have already given you the example of kharkov, but mayors everywhere give interviews and say what the losses will be in the local budget, let's take mykolaiv, we all know what is happening there, constant shelling. constant restoration, critical infrastructure is constantly destroyed by the russians, so mykolaiv in the event of the adoption of this law, he will lose 2 billion 700 million uah, and to be honest, this is half of the city's funds, this is what the local authorities say, and again, you answer to them, don't worry, come to us, we will do everything for you, and we will give you money from kyiv, as i said one of the well-known specialists in the field of art, i do not believe, because you will do it selectively, and unfortunately, today

the central government produces this trust, and as for other regions, the koryukiv community, for example, is talking about spending 40 million uah from the local budget, novgorod-sivirska, the head of the community says about the fact that uah 30 million will be lost, semenivsk community - uah 30 million, and for many communities, these are very critical funds. the zhovki community in the lviv region is supposedly far from the front line, but the example of slavuty showed us everything, they say that they currently have about 12 million military pdf. and if they take it away, then, as they say, the local community will sit. without money, and here, as for why i give these examples, so that you understand that it is not possible to just voluntarily take this pdf and

take it away, because everyone, frankly, at the moment, at the moment, this pdf as a whole is, in general, approximately 300 billion hryvnias for the 24th year, this is the total, of which local communities receive 64%, that is 200. so, of these 200, you want to take every second hryvnia of the local community to the central level , and now we move to the level of control. we have submitted a lot of amendments to establish an additional layer of control. it is because of this level of control , we believe, and there are risks, because of the insufficiency of this level of control, there are risks that the transfer of money from the local to the central level will lead to a much larger corruption, and you know, the question is another one, the question is self-control, and here i understand,

dsti, the ministry of digital transformation, they have this self-control, as it seems to me, at the moment, because they come, report, they answer to requests, not formally, but with numbers, they try to do something. in my opinion, self-control in the ministry of strategy is now almost non-existent, and the rhetorical question is, who do you think is easier to control? mayors who walk the streets every day, or ministers, or deputy ministers, or the heads of the department from the cabinet of ministers, who are sitting on hrushevsky street, around which passage is prohibited everywhere, what do you think about it, we have already talked about it, but this is a very serious story, the next question that i would like to discuss, today in this

hall, the fraction servants of the people, if i am not mistaken, we have 234 people, a large part of them are majoritarians , but i would, what i know, majoritarians from servants, not all, but quite a few also go to people and communicate with people , our faction is all 27 as one is constantly in the fields, we understand this better than anyone, we spend many hours behind the wheel in order to get to the region, return, talk to people, and ukraine is located, well, it is there for the budget committee, let’s move on to budget issues, if not i'm wrong, 1469 local budgets, it seems to me that this figure is real,

yes. european solidarity asked the majority of communities, and almost all communities, how do you feel about this bill, which will take the pdf military from local authorities and transfer it to the central level, we received hundreds of appeals, and most of them more than two hundred were voted in sessions, in many communities, you know , there are no sessions now, because... there are military-civilian administrations, but we received hundreds of appeals from local authorities, here i have this the list is there, so that this decision is at least changed, despite the fact that they openly say that most local communities direct personal income tax from military units, again to military units, and you know, here i am i would like

to personally. personally taking advantage of the opportunity appeal to those majoritarian servants of the people who may be present in the hall today, although, to be honest, there are almost none of them here, so that they do not vote for this law, but appeal to the voters, appeal with a different story, control how they vote for this law, because, i emphasize, the task is very simple: not to vote for this law in the second reading. but should i send it for a second reading, but it seems to me that the regulations do not allow this, although no, it allows it to be done one more time, if i am not mistaken, and there is already take into account that 20% of the money goes directly to the brigades, desti, let them receive the money, instead of minstratekhprom, direct it to the ministry of defense, but also under the control, for example, of the budget committee of the verkhovna rada and

representatives of nato. and also leave a certain part in the communities for bomb shelters, critical infrastructure and fortifications, but it is necessary to differentiate in this draft law to approach communities that are on the front line or in the near-front zone, this is how it should be done, i am a russian military ship, i propose to put weapons, valued in ukraine and glorious will, our possessions will be taken away, they will die in a dream.