[000:00:00;00] but well, because they consider this territory their own, they sold it, nationalized it first and everything , and they have the money, why can’t the same procedure be applied to medvedchuk’s estates, i understand very well that medvedchuk is not the only one of those traitors who either fled or somewhere they went abroad, not only are his estates here, many others can also arise right away, but specifically before this, it is possible or not, but you said correctly, ukraine is not russia, just take it and take it away, no, we can't, because actually i already am...' she said several different legal procedures, but surely they all take time, and here we are, the main goal, why we wanted to check what happened to this property, to remind the officials that society has not forgotten what we expect from of effective work in this direction, in particular, in the direction of collecting into state income, the assets of pro-russian figures and russians in ukraine who support the war, and actually, i mean the russian

assets of russians. where these assets are located in ukraine, actually, yes, we want officials collected information about this property, collected evidence of the work of these oligarchs, russian and pro-russian, in the interests of russia more effectively, faster, and did not hope that we would forget about it, but of course everything must be done within the framework of legal procedures, in particular, there is a procedure for recovery through higher anti-corruption... a court that allows you to prove that he acted in the interests of moscow, in particular, he paid taxes, for example , in the occupied crimea, this is a direct point for such a penalty, he did it, and in the end yes, confiscate all this, well next, it's there there will be a separate procedure for what to do with it in the event of confiscation, because all this must obviously

be sold to someone and must go according to law to the fund for liquidation of the consequences of russian aggression, you know, that's all this story about the fact that we have medvedchuk's estates and they do not know what to do with them, they are protected, they exist , the state does not receive money from these estates, and despite everything, we say to our european partners, give us the frozen assets of russia, but we have the assets of medvedchuk in ukraine, that is, they are not allowed here to touch in some way, i understand, but you give us there, so if you can't do it legally somehow. well, we don't know, you have to search there, it takes a long time, and it doesn't take long to search for russian property in europe, just like that , he went out and found it, well, that's hypocrisy, really, isn't it? eh, to a certain extent, to a certain extent, but i definitely don't want to say that we are some kind of losers, no no, not losers, well, you just have to do our part of the job, you're right, absolutely, yes, we have to do his part of the work, for example, this yacht, one of the most expensive yachts in the world, which still belongs to medvedchuk, well, he is

in black. companies, which is now arrested in croatia, we probably heard from the arma agency every two months, and it is now transferred to the management of the arma agency, although arma did not take it on the balance sheet, so as not to pay for its storage, but the decision that it has been transferred, it exists, there is a court order, arma itself could dispose of it in some way, for example, make money from it by renting it out, but apparently arma is not capable of doing this, i.e. all these months arma says: well , we will somehow sell her at a... auction, but there has been no auction yet, arma could at least try to rent it all out to earn from the use of this yacht while it is under arma's management, but this has also not been done, that is, okay, at least we do not incur losses in order to protect this property, to preserve it, but, but still, i think we could already make money from this, but months pass by months and

nothing happens. thank you very much, ms. alisa, alisa yurchenko, editor and journalist of the bygosinfo project, days pass, nights pass, well, indeed , there is rustling and so on, taras hryhorych, shevchenko wrote , well, in our country, but this, well, you know this, this, this, this is just me, well, imagine , a person, a traitor, a criminal, well, medvedchuk, prepared aggression, illegally acquired property in ukraine, because we understand very well that he took money from russia, and he is a lawyer there, and so on, and so on, we understand all this , but it is proven that russia paid huge sums of money for agency work and menial work here in ukraine to his agents, all this was overseen by viktor volodymyrovych medvedchuk, of course, who is putin’s best man, and there are billions of dollars there, and this money was bought for a yacht, houses, property, a person, exchanged, given to russia, there they took our people, and now it’s all standing and you can’t touch it, well, that is, it’s a very strange story, i

won’t be surprised if similar property is in other less, less well-known and promoted such, russian agents or other thieves who escaped, it also stands, is guarded, no one can touch it, some kind of business working. money drips somewhere, but we say to the europeans: give us russian assets, for what? well, so that they also disappear somewhere later. serhiy zgurets, director of the defense express agency, host of the military summaries of the day column, serhiy, congratulations, congratulations to you, congratulations to our viewers , today there are many topics, but i will ask, what is it about, because i was impressed by this story, i read it on the internet on the website about the fact that the enemy began to apply new tactics of using fpv drones and in some places the enemy manages to achieve success with the armed forces of ukraine, precisely with with the use of fpv drones, the armed forces of ukraine are not saying that there is panic, let's all die, they are simply saying that we need more so that we can effectively oppose the enemy and his new tactics, which in fact he is always looking for, is there really

something like that the enemies have come up with something new, and do we need more, how much more do we need these drones so that we can stop the enemy attacks, well, i read russian publications where they themselves are afraid of the tactics of ukrainian drones, it says that these ukrainian drones there are sound proof sensors, somewhere they are on standby, then they go up and destroy russian targets, so i think now we are talking about the fact that new approaches to use are really being worked out, and this is another facet of our war with the enemy, and then we will talk about new drones from ukroboronprom, and about the combat operations near bakhmut and the specifics of the use of our artillery there, and also about whether it is worth talking about the fact that the war with russia is reaching a dead end, about this later,

in a moment. i will start with news from ukroboronprom, regarding the manufacture in ukraine of new long-range kamikat drones and these fpv drones. the general announced the details. director of the joint-stock company ukrainian defense industry herman smitanin, now called ukoboronprom, because of the long-range unmanned systems capable of carrying out strike missions at a distance of up to 1,000 km, which ukroboronprom promised last year. now herman smitan reported that such drones are already being produced in cooperation with foreign partners, ordered and used by the defense of ukraine. however, wop itself is now focused on making more complex and expensive projects with better characteristics, of course this is good, but as far as i'm concerned, the question now is not in more expensive drones, but in scaling

samples that can perform missions for an acceptable price and in significant volumes of production, and just like that, by the way, okromprom operates in the production of tactical fpv drones, if you take into account herman smitanin's information, he says that license agreements have been signed with three foreign companies for the production relevant fpv, drone models, and the assembly of such drones is carried out at the facilities of ukrainian state enterprises. we have people, premises, components are delivered to us and we produce, - noted the head of ukroboronprom. i hope that we are talking about significant amounts, or with access to significant amounts. also gen. ukobromprom spoke about the state of development of the sapsan operational-tactical complex. now we will see which peregrine falcon we are talking about, we already saw it at the parade before the active phase of hostilities. yes, according to the words smetanina is a state program to increase

the production of rockets. people work, they all want to be motivated, they want to strike, although smitanin in the interview uses a more emotional word for that moscow, so that no one will see it. but during the meeting, says smitani, it is for secret information that cannot be shared, that is, about the state of implementation of this missile program, but let me remind you that just last week , the head of the main directorate of missile forces and artillery and unmanned systems of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, brigadier general serhii baranov said that ukraine already has a missile that successfully hit targets at a distance of 700 km, there are already prototypes undergoing testing, whether these are different samples or the same as what smetanin says, we will see after some time. but i want this time of use of these strike systems against the enemy to be as short as possible, but for now the main work on

the battlefield is performed by our barrel and rocket artillery in all areas of the front, and now volodymyr nazarenko is joining us, he is an artillery officer of the fourth brigade of the rubizh national guard, which is currently operating in the direction of bakhma, mr. volodymyr, welcome to the channel, glad to see and hear, good evening, mr. serhiy, good evening studio, good evening tv viewers, now the enemy near mahmut is trying to improve its tactical position there, they are trying to regain certain positions there, they are using aviation, artillery, possibly armored vehicles in separate directions, genstam says that during the past day there were offensives near avdiivka and klishchivka , and there were offensives near berkhivka, which now is happening in the area of ​​responsibility of your brigade, how does the situation look now in the last few days, what changes are taking place there, what should i tell our viewers about them, i would like

to say first of all that the situation remains stable and tense, it does not change much in the last months, basically the war there is in a certain way extremely complex , extremely dynamic, extremely intense, and the enemy has used all the arsenal that he has, and there he never stops using the weapons that he has and to the maximum extent uses those powers. those means, those resources that he possesses, and the use of artillery, the use of aviation, attempts to advance, attempts to assault, attempts, to look for weak points, to use cheap mobilized or disposable soldiers, they call them differently these vanyaks, convicts, mercenaries, never stopped and didn't stop, you can really notice the different intensity during this time, but every... day, it's fighting, every day,

it's, clashes that don't stop, both us and the enemy, unfortunately, ah, when sees the goal uses, strikes strikes, they also have drones , what we say, we see the enemy there at a distance of 5 , 10, 15, 20 km, there with different means, different, well, different units and so on, but the enemy unfortunately, their artillery sees the same way and strikes the same way. their means of fire, their machine guns, and in principle, everything they have, they work less aimed, but they act and try to compensate for this with a huge amount, a huge density of fire, of all calibers, from automatic, from machine gun, finishing there, large-caliber artillery. sir, when you talk about artillery, i wanted to ask about its use on both sides, whether it is possible to talk about the parity of intensive fire, whether you use cluster ammunition, whether you have to

save them, these are the nuances that directly relate to your specialized knowledge and tasks, our brigade, the fourth brigade , the national guard, the artillery, the artillery units cannot say that there is a certain parity in ammunition, because the enemy, as more iron, and more ammunition, and we ourselves - well, first of all, well, when you ask the question, are we saving money, we have to understand the responsibility, we have to understand at what cost, the opportunity is given thanks to the help of western partners, thanks to the ukrainian there , well, by effort, let's say so, i don't want to go into detail there, but each ammunition seems quite difficult, and we have to understand that it is our responsibility, it is everyone's skill. a soldier, for a bullet,

for a mine, for a projectile, a rocket flew to the target and was as effective as possible, orcs, what we can safely say and note, they do not save ammunition, for them there is no such understanding that there is any shortage or there is a problem, they quite often use what they have navation, covering the planes, but unfortunately, it also destroys, just as flies somewhere. in the same way , unfortunately, it explodes somewhere, and this, this is, in principle, a war. mr. volodymyr, everyone will now discuss the publication of general zaluzhnyi, where he mentions, among other things, the need to increase the effectiveness of the counter-battery fight against the enemy, this is how it looks in your area, whether these tasks are carried out by the forces of the brigade, or for this there are such more powerful systems that are there in the depth behind

your back, back and destroy. the artillery means of the enemy, we understand very well that under artillery, guards, blood, soldiers, infantry, and this is our responsibility first of all, to work in such a way as to secure every ukrainian soldier, as much as possible to do so, to destroy the enemy's fire means, and here everything depends on the enemy's firearm, from what system he uses. as it turns out, it turns out with many factors, one of the main components, one of the main components, not the only one, but one of the main components, these are drones, flying there, well, different aircraft, the same mavics, the same night drones, and as soon as the enemy target is found, believe me, there is a certain resource , there are, and work those means that can work, which are determined to destroy the enemy

gun, so that it is already punished and does not work, does not fire and does not fire ukrainian soldiers, and mr. volodya, the last question is coming... winter , we need to think now about what we need to prepare for the winter, improve fortification, whether there are suitable means for this, well, conditionally speaking, to send excavators, other things that would help to build these or other protective structures faster? there are never too many means, i repeat, because everything can break, everything can work out, there are a lot of motivated people. and we need much, much more resources, i am not saying that there are no problems, there is nothing, but there is never too much, i repeat , both drones and cars, jeeps, i mean, especially now, when there is bad weather, when the weather is deteriorating, when

the logistics are very difficult, when it is difficult, difficult life at zero, the same engineering. equipment, engineering, engineering, the more of these, the faster, the better, the more, and in order to win this war, we have to become much , much better than the occupier than the enemy, use the advantages that are in our army, in the defense forces, the ukrainian nation, in general. mr. volodymyr, thank you very much for your professional comments, thank you for your service, for what you do for our country, and let me remind our viewers that this was volodymyr nazarenko, an artillery officer. of the fourth brigade of the rubizh national guard, which is currently operating in the bakhmut direction. and then about other aspects on the front line, what is happening there on a larger scale, we will talk about this with our next guest, viktor kevlyuk, a reserve colonel and an expert of the center for defense strategies, joins us. mr. victor,

i greet you, glad to see and hear. good evening, mr. sergey. the first question, i wanted to ask you how it is possible to see the general situation on the front line now, including the kupinsky direction, avdiivka, kherson region, the left bank, can we talk about the transition to an oppositional war, or draw such conclusions it is still too early, if you follow the directions, on kupyanskoye , the enemy is trying to get to the left bank of the oskil river, trying to break through near sinkivka, which he is doing extremely poorly. some activity in the liman direction has stopped altogether, because the two armies of the central military district have been diverted from this direction to other directions, due to the lack of reserves that the enemy has in

the avdiyivka area, bright efforts are being made to surround our defenders in the city, the enemy is attacking from krasnogohorivka in the direction of berdychi and lasstochkina. from the water one, from the south to the north and to orlivka, so far there is a slight advance in the north, the worker came to the outskirts of the coke chemical plant, in the south the advance is several hundred meters, which, which in essence, there is no such influence on the general situation, in kherson, in the kherson direction, the command of the enemy is felt, because there it is still not clear what to do with the ukrainian bridgeheads, which our marines created on the left bank of the dnieper, periodically the enemy tries to liberate, to say the right to capture

the krynyk, cossack camps, the steppe, the sandbank and the floodplain, he also can't do anything, now the newly formed 144 separate...' rifle brigade is advancing there, the enemy is inflicting enough serious air strikes on the bridgeheads, but cannot bring the artillery closer, because it is very quickly suppressed by the artillery of the defense forces from the right, to say that the situation is creeping into a positional war, well , it is a little premature to talk about it now, but the enemy is making every effort ... to the war entered exactly this phase. well then, logically, we are moving on to a series of publications, headed by valery zaluzhnyi in the zaekonist publication. now they are actively discussing there with experts and politicians, in your opinion, these five areas

technological changes that are outlined by the head , are they enough to win, as he writes, in the modern positional war, or is there something missing in these conclusions, what are your assessments? in my opinion, this is absolutely not enough, because bare technologies by themselves, none... advantages in their pure form will not be given if we do not have personnel who are trained to use these technologies, there are no weapons that physically implement technological assets, to say about the fact that the very fact of the presence of technologies is probably not quite correct, if you go through points, the acquisition of f16 fighters is definitely a step forward , but the grouping... in the air also needs to be covered, no one is talking about strike aircraft, overcoming air defense, about

collective defense aircraft against radio electronic suppression, no one is talking about the fact that overcoming the air defense system involves the physical destruction by fire strikes of air defense elements on the ground, for this both long-range artillery and high-precision missiles are needed. if we talk about overcoming minefields, yes, of course, it is a huge problem, as it turned out, but in addition to minefields, there are non -explosive and non-explosive engineering barriers that also need to be overcome, that is, to conduct a maneuverable war , it was necessary to have units capable of maneuvering quickly and efficiently, you need units that will ensure maneuver, how , for example, in the us armed forces, maneuver support brigades have been formed. if we go this

way, it would be a very good step forward. as for means of radio-electronic warfare, well, personally , it is strange to me, and who will use it, who will train personnel who must have such a good engineering education in order to use all this, unless, of course , we are talking about trench rap, which has also won its place on the battlefield, and must definitely be implemented. that is, the commander-in-chief, perhaps due to lack of space, did not explain his thoughts in more detail. a lot of things should be added to what valery fedorovych said, but it seems that the journal publication does not allow it. but this post sparked. there was also a certain internal

resonance, there were statements from the office the president, that it is not necessary to comment there in order to reveal to the public what is happening at the front and what may happen at the front, this is what zhovko said precisely on the article of the zaluzhny, then there were statements by the president of ukraine that the war has not reached a dead end, although zaluzhny himself did not write about it, and the last thing that was from the president, that on the edition of nbc news, for the television channel, he said that ukraine is considering changes in its military , changes in its military strategy and repeated again, that the war has not come to a dead end. or it can be said that there are different visions between the political and military leadership in the formation of such a new strategy. how do you assess such, well, different views on the part of the political military authorities on the situation on the front line?

well, if we run through the points of your question, the commander-in-chief's office has a strategic communications department , it was created in order not to comment on anything, or at least to explain to society, but what is happening in general in the war, what is the armed forces doing, where are they moving, what they don't have enough, or on the contrary, and they achieved something on the contrary, so when formally. whether the deputy chief of stapler and cartridge undertakes to comment on military affairs without having any authority to do so, this is strange, and as for the speech of the supreme commander-in-chief, here , too, the war itself does not go into any corners, it is brought there by the supreme commander-in-chief, for that , so that she does not turn there, he has a stake, accordingly, all those people should form a strategy for victory. and inform the society about it.

today, as far as i know, we have the pre-war military security strategy, which was developed by collective efforts, came out of the national security and defense council, but judging by the fact that the war began, this strategy was not effective, accordingly, it is time to change the strategy, and all the shapers, the ministry of defense, as the leading body in the field of defense strategies, the national security council, and the general staff, as a working body of the stake, should focus on this, are they engaged in this, well , in the public sphere, i personally did not come across any information about this. mr. viktor, how about our foreign ones partners will now digest these statements of the publication, the vision, of general zaluzhnyi, can we say that they can become such a basis for the concept of joint actions for the next year, or are these exaggerated

expectations of the effect of this publication? from the publication... and in general from the speeches of such significant figures in the field of security and defense, i would note the speech of the coordinator of the national security council of the white house, retired admiral john kirby, and probably the speech of the former commander of the us armed forces in europe, general ben hodges. general hodges clearly said that zaluzhny is sober and professional. and understands what ukraine needs to win, from those two speeches i can clearly conclude that the article in the economist is definitely a kind of beacon for our partners to form a strategy for the 24th year, and when we are still talking about the quick possibility of the appearance of these new technological solutions, there is such

an uncertainty factor, when these technological solutions will provide a synergy effect, maybe it will be for an excessively long time, and then the question arises in the ability of our partners to provide the needs of the defense forces in basic needs, in particular in artillery, ammunition, missiles, how do you now assess the capabilities and capacities of our partners next year to provide these primary, well, needs of the ukrainian army, will such a certain opportunity gap occur right at the beginning or in the middle of the year, given, in particular, the lack of ammunition, given the lack of capacity of our european and american partners? well, at the end of the second year of the war, it is hardly advisable to talk about the need to ensure priority needs, needs, it is necessary to form the capabilities necessary for victory, in order to clearly understand what capabilities we need, it is necessary to have a strategy that will explain how

to move from a state of stalemate of a positional war to a state. here, the politicians and the military have to work very specifically, as regards the defense capabilities of our partners, i think that our opportunities next year will be significantly limited, not only because of their reluctance to help someone in the way that we i would like to, well, for example, we already see how we are firing german taurus missiles, but german politicians still do not see, there are a lot of technological issues that do not allow us to work quickly, do not allow us to produce the amount of weapons that we need, the monthly consumption of artillery ammunition , the ordinary, armed forces of ukraine exceed the capabilities of the entire

civilized world that supports ukraine, the situation should improve: by 2025, er, yes, to put a little spoonful of sugar into this cup, according to expert estimates, the stock of tanks in of our adversary, should be reached by the end of 2024, that is, it will be a little easier. sir, mr. viktor, thank you very much for your professional comments, for these clarifications for our viewers, and i would like to remind you that viktor kevlyuk, reserve colonel and expert of the center for defense strategies, was on the air. these were the main highlights of the military results of the day, more international and economic news, further in the news release, which will now be hosted by vasyl