m. actually, air defense, ground air defense, can see mostly at an altitude of 2,000 m. therefore, it is quite logical that the same ukrainian low-flying aircraft counted on the fact that this aircraft would not be seen. this is a russian station, but if you talk directly about the need or implementation , that is, an attempt to use it instead of satellite systems that allow you to see everything and on the ground, it is difficult for me to explain, just as, perhaps, it is difficult to explain why the russians draw planes on concrete. ugh, well , or they are covered by these deaf people with tires, tires, too , which is not absolutely effective, i have a question about, well, here maybe some concrete gain can be understood, because it flies high, you can't get a bearing there, so to speak, or somehow at once.

but regarding the askolt ship, because we have often heard that the crimean peninsula, both before and after the annexation, was turned by the russians into such a solid military base, it should be protected as much as possible, especially, morphlo, this russian navy, but we can see that our forces of resistance, together with aviation and land forces troops, and with those who take care of water drones, destroy ships all the time. ship ascolt, temporarily. occupied in the occupied kerch, it was already struck by aviation, damaging it, so that it was disabled, what does this indicate, have we really reached a new level of resistance? in fact, if we talk about the advantage in the sky of using missiles provided to us by our partners, then we are conducting large-scale, powerful operations, we have seen the destruction of the headquarters in the crimea. and directly for

the destruction of s-400 computer complexes, this russian air defense, we managed to destroy two such complexes, one in the kherson region, and the other directly in the crimea, and therefore, in fact, here i would say that, firstly, the component is the professionalism of our military, who actually do impossible things, and secondly, it is thanks to such modern missiles that allow bypassing russian air defenses. but then what can we say about the kerch bridge, which is again a powerful logistical component for the russian army, because we remember, for example, our ships, vessels in the area of ​​the bridge crossing, the russians, the military, i mean, the russians were hiding behind some civilian vessels, as an option , they installed some nets there, stretched them, but can this secure this bridge, the same

stormshadow or techoms, if they are more long-range, if there will be more long-range systems, then of course it will not save, but we must understand that we need to pay more attention directly to the railway bridge of the bridge, not the road bridge, but actually what we have been trying to do recently, well, but as a matter of fact it is one construction, that is, well, conditionally , plus or minus, they hit one... point, or are they slightly different in terms of their monumentality, power , and attempts to hit these constructions? if they built them directly from a security point of view, then they had to calculate that it should be separate, but we understand that they built it very quickly by the way, so maybe there are some holes with this construction, uh, i just mentioned the atakams and about stormshadow, which we already have, we are waiting for more long-range options from the us, like you ... what

is the cardinal problem, or a question for the german government, in particular chancellor olaf scholz himself, because the bundeswehr and the bundestag are still considering whether or not to give taurs, but just the other day, our head of the ministry of internal affairs, mr. koleba , dmytro noted that this issue is still open did not put, that is, we are trying to somehow convince them, but why are they hesitating and would they somehow change the course of the situation in the war? in my opinion, the question here is more political and directly from the side of the german government, how they expect the reaction his electorate. we understand that certain circles in germany, which support, are on the russian side, and we understand that they are calculating, the germans are calculating from their side, also their possible positions there, in the future.

some elections or something like that is clear, that is, politically, as they say, there is no political will, yes, or there is still a little fear left, inherited from angela merkel, olaf scholz, fear of the russian federation, the very end is another question, there is the news that the netherlands is transferring has already transferred the first f-16s to romania pilot training from ukraine. could this be a signal that the f-16s themselves, after all, if they are already near us, in neighboring romania, sesh will be in ukraine at the beginning of the new year. by the way, to which forecasts are you more inclined to the fact that the planes will already be guarding our borders and our homeland at the beginning of the spring of the 24th year. or closer to the end of the summer of 24? well, i would predict and keep saying that it is the end of february-march, especially since denmark promised to give us something already in march, but understanding the position

of the netherlands, i think they will be the first to provide, and again , it will most likely be the beginning of spring or the end of winter, well, i understand, given that they have just done direct training of our pilots, which method, according to which program, not only trained pilots are trained, that is , retraining takes place, but also the training of young pilots who have not yet had experience. huh, well, this is an optimistic scenario, i would like it to come true, if we talk about the aviation component, we we often intensively discuss in our broadcasts exactly the 16th and the provision of these combat multipurpose aircraft. and for some reason we pay little attention to combat helicopters, by the way, at the beginning there, after the large-scale invasion, poland and other countries of yezde, which helped us with these combat vehicles, do you think, should we still, well, emphasize in our negotiations with partners, on to the same armenstein, exactly on combat

helicopters and on which ones exactly? in fact there is a need and there are a large number of helicopters that could help us on the line. front and well, let's put it this way, there are certain talks about the transfer of such helicopters, i think that in this direction, somewhere in four months we will see some certain movements. well, the key thing, what i hope the audience took away from this conversation, is that the f16 will already be at the end of winter, the beginning of spring, next year, and so be it, thank you for the opportunity to join, anatoly khrapchynsky, expert on . was just with us, and in the end we discuss various topics with various guests, do not miss the most important thing, the broadcast continues, we continue our

the broadcast of the conversation with the political psychologist elena vostrova, we are in direct contact, mrs. elena, we welcome you, congratulations, so you know, i would like to start with a topical topic, topical information, unfortunately, this is how we have information about what died.. valery zaluzhnyi's assistant, and on this example , i would like to discuss with you the reaction of society. we see that this information and various topics, various variations, conjectures have begun to be discussed in the public space, various narratives are beginning to be spread by russian propagandists, and the ukrainian information space, some political figures pick up this rhetoric, why, why do ukrainians continue these fakes, for more than a year and a half, continue to pick up all this information, well, this speaks of the level of our education in terms of media literacy and political literacy, the level remains quite

low. unfortunately, the main source of information that ukrainians read about the war are telegram channels, and the telegram channels that spread this information, ukrainians do not even know who is, let’s say, the owner, who is the source, where these telegram channels take this information, it is not verified information, it can be very often , absolutely hype, emotionally charged, well , people like to scroll through it, they read everything from there, this is the first point, the second thing you need to understand is that the russians conduct permanent information campaign against the military-political leadership of ukraine, and this campaign, it continued until full scale. invasion, and in fact it has now escalated, and this company includes various informational and psychological operations, in fact, what kind of deep-fake are we today we are witnessing such a definite apogee, when a slanderer comes out and seems to say such and such a slanderer’s turn, you can call

it that, such and such is certain, it is an otpfake, and the second point that must also be taken into account is that the most effective ipso, the most effective... information campaigns russians, today there are exactly those campaigns that are based on those rifts, on those conflicts and on those informational reasons that we ourselves create within our society, that is, now we are observing with this case, the accident with valery zaluzhny's assistant, we are witnessing a certain apogee of the information company, which is rolling against the commander-in-chief valery zaluzhny, such a wave of discredit, here the question is why ukrainians pick up on it, how to fight it, i understand correctly that the opposition in the main thing is you in society, how it should look, how it would be much more effective, what to do

in order to be media literate, first of all , you need to be interested in the term media literate, just ruin the course with mediagrammatics and take this course, this is the first moment, secondly, use only verified sources of information, see all telegram channels, if you know where they are from, who is the owner of these telegram channels, and where the information is published, subscribe exclusively to those publications that are official, that are confirmed, that are responsible for what they print, we have enough sources of information that we can, that we can trust, moreover, we must subscribe to such telegram channels, which have such blue marks, but this is also not. with a marker, because those channels that are not entirely virtuous can put it there, so

it is better to use official sources of information, eh, i would like to ask you how the human psyche reacts to news, yes, because i recently read information about that when a person reads the same information , the same news in different sources, yes, on different telegram channels, or sees the same photo several times, the psyche does not perceive it as one... and the same event for her, it's like several such terrible events that happened, and this is an even greater load on the nervous system and it leads to stress, is it really so, well , people perceive it differently, there are those people who, for example, saw something they know and skip it, well, that is, they turn it over, they don’t consider it information, but that’s how the brain gets overloaded and really starts to accumulate some, certain negativity with information that, there is such a technology that russia uses very

often, it’s called transboid lies, that is, the same lie, from different ones angles of angles are presented, in different interpretations, targeting different audiences, but nevertheless such a whole mass of this information is really accumulating, it is already perceived as something true, because the more sources say about it, the more we hear about it, the more in consists of us. that this is some truth, but how to deal with this state, yes, when you feel that you are overstressed and you have too much information, you need to exhale conditionally, well, there is such a formula as information detox, that is, you need to do it for a certain day to say that there at such and such an hour i scroll through the news feed and read the news, and well, just like on schedule, how i eat.

this is how we accept information, with information, by the way, this metaphor of food, it seems to me to be very productive, this is how we eat those products that we very importantly select and choose healthy food for ourselves if we want to live long and be healthy, you should behave the same way with information, i.e. limit, not eat excessively and consume only that information that is of high quality, that comes from official confirmed sources sources, and more... i would like to discuss a very important topic with you, because we, well, in february, it will be two years since we live in the conditions of a large-scale full-scale war of the russian federation against ukraine, and for many, this war, these explosions can become a situation that cannot be said to be normal, but a common one, and we see and understand that people there often say, oh, i'm not going to the bomb shelter, because god forbid, i'm already tired of all this. how it affects a person, this is this

adrenaline addiction and how much it is dangerously. the fact that our psyche adapts to stressful situations is completely normal, but the fact that we begin to neglect safety measures is not normal, so in such conditions as a full-scale invasion, as periodic bombings, you still need to adjust yourself to that our life is the greatest value, and there are certain measures, security, safety rules that must be followed, of course, we are used to the fact that we hear air alarms, but it is not necessary to hide, especially since now the period is approaching.. cold, winter, when the russians will possibly make some massive attacks on our energy structure, and this is where it will be necessary to listen to all the air alarms and go to the bomb shelters, you don’t need to neglect this, because the situations can develop, well, quite serious, but about adrenaline addiction, that’s what will come peaceful time, it will come, we hope in the near

future, whether or not we will have this feeling and this, i don't want to say wish. hear those explosions, but, but anyway, how do you explain this adrenaline addiction and its consequences? well, if someone has an adrenaline addiction, then it is better to use it at the front, you need to mobilize and go there with your adrenaline addiction, if adrenaline is needed, if you really want some kind of drive, now the formula is in general, let's say this, we understand that war for a long time, what can it be... a positional war, which will be very bloody and long-lasting, so there will be only one formula here, you are either in the armed forces or for the armed forces, and then how will you deal with this adrenaline addiction after the war, well, it is special techniques, there are special methods, how to get out of this state, and each person individually chooses how to do it, in general, adrenaline addiction, it is desirable

to translate this adrenaline into something very constructive, because aggression can be directed both destructively and destroying the life of a person and the people around him, and constructively in gain, in some planning , in obtaining resources, in order to develop some kind of professional activity, to learn some new languages ​​for yourself, even to learn something new, and in this way to build your own life, in fact, even to direct this aggression in earning money, it is also that in search of a new job and there in some direction of construction. our servicemen, who have also been at the front for quite a long time, and let's hope that in the near future they will return home alive, and yes, this addiction to adrenaline will need to be reformatted into something useful, thank you for your advice, olena vostrova, political psychologist , was in direct contact with us. well, we are continuing the broadcast

of the nationwide marathon edyni news, now on our broadcast is roman yedeliev, international lawyer, associate professor of the department of international law of taras shevchenko kyiv national university. congratulations , mr. roman. i congratulate you. from the discussion of the recent statement of the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine dmytro koleba, i would like to start a conversation with you, yes, he said that the european union, in the end, presented the work on the format of the future special tribunal, says that they discussed for quite a long time, worked on the option of a possible form , of this special tribunal, but it is obvious that there are no details yet divulged, mr. roman, how would you see this, what type, what format of the tribunal do we need, is it beneficial for us, and perhaps you can already analyze what our colleagues from the european

union can recommend to us? well, ukraine has two main tasks, firstly, that a tribunal for the crime of aggression be created and secondly, that it be international enough to overcome the immunity of the head of state, the head of government and the minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation, which is in national justice because we don't we can in our national court bring any of these three persons to justice for any national criminal offense or any international criminal offense, including the crime of aggression. the european union is one of the institutions, one of the organizations that is working to create such an international tribunal. also, the united states of america is working on this task, a special working group from more than 40

countries is working, and here are all organizations, including. europe is trying to develop one more or less acceptable and realistic mechanism of such a special tribunal. as you remember, about a year ago we talked about the fact that the best option for such a special tribunal is to create it, according to the resolution of the general assembly of the united nations, the best option, of course, is the un security council, but it is clear that the russian federation will block envisages such a resolution, but in the un general assembly, the decision is made by a simple majority of votes from those states that participate in the vote, so it is more or less real option, at least in theory , we faced the fact that some states fear the creation of such an international

special tribunal, specifically regarding the international crime of aggression, the reason is that the crime of aggression in modern international law is not sufficiently developed, we have a definition of the crime of aggression, we we have actions that constitute the crime of aggression, but we do not have... any judicial decisions that would develop this definition, and we do not have sufficient practice, and individual states are afraid of developing and creating such a practice, so that in the future it is obvious that this practice can be used against them as well, some states - mr. roman, for example, the united states of america, yes, they support this tribunal, but they are unlikely to help ukraine gather votes. in the un general assembly, but we understand that we unfortunately cannot do this on our own, so now ukraine is actively working

on other options for the creation of this tribunal, for example, through the council of europe and the european union , yes we can observe here a certain competition between these two organizations, which is good in principle, because it contributes to the fact that each of these organizations wants to get ahead and wants to offer a more effective, more efficient, better model for ukraine, the main risk for ukraine , so that this tribunal is not created in accordance with the national legislation of ukraine, so that the decision is not made in the name of ukraine, and so that this decision is not considered as made by a ukrainian court in general, we need... that it be an international tribunal, we need there to be no questions about its internationality, its jurisdiction and the decision it has

to make, well, about 20-30 people who directly committed the crime of aggression, both from the russian federation and from sides of the republic of belarus, briefly, mr. roman, you say, you said at the beginning, you used such a term that this special trial should be. international enough, enough, it means that a certain number of countries must participate, there is no clear answer to this question, you see if a tribunal is created by a resolution of the general assembly, the general assembly, then it is created on behalf of the entire united nations organization, regardless of how many states voted for this resolution, if there is a mechanism for creating a tribunal through international faith as one of the possible options, then in in such a case, how many states are needed to join this international treaty so that it

is unequivocally recognized as international, yes, because the russians can also create some judicial body there, call it international, to add to the work of this body the states that support the russian federation, for example, iran, nikara. and eritrea, and call it international, well, we understand that it will not be an international judicial body, in order for the international criminal court to start, so in 2001, 60 states were enough, apparently we need to orient ourselves, but not a smaller number of states, in order for this tribunal to be unequivocally recognized as international, it is better if there are more than half of the member states of the united nations organizations. that is, 193, well respectively 90, 7, 98, close to 100 states, but you understand the international agreement

, it takes a long time to collect these signatures in the states, how then will the states ratify this international agreement, this is a big problem of this way of creation through an international agreement and therefore well, ukraine is quite skeptical about him, because it can stretch for a year, two, three, and let's hope that during this time ukraine will win, putin will cease to be the head of state, acting, yes, and then he can be drawn to responsibility and in national courts, that is, seconds are important here, so about speed, is there another alternative option so that this process, the very formation of this special tribunal, does not drag on for years or tens of years, 30 seconds, it is created within the framework of some international organization or council of europe or the european union with the accession of states to such a tribunal, as well as the united states of america and

other states'. of ukraine, this is a possible option, but how to write it out, unfortunately, we will see it only after the european union publishes this proposal, after consultations with ukraine, which is very important, without us the decision is neither published nor adopted , and this is of course a victory for ukrainian diplomacy, absolutely, thank you for joining in, for your comments, roman and i talked about bringing to justice all those guilty of crimes against of ukraine. so in particular the russian federation, the russian federation and the military and political leadership, we were contacted by an international lawyer, associate professor of the department of international law, taras shevchenko national university of kyiv, roman yedeliv. chevrons, that bring victory closer. russia continues

to commit the most brutal crime against ukraine. the war continues on the sports front as well. at every competition, ukrainian athletes express their position. do not shake hands with a russian athlete, raise a poster - no, war in ukraine. this is our appeal to the sports community. yes, we risk disqualification and our careers, but this is nothing compared to the pain and the price ukrainians pay every day. for us , the most important thing is the victory of ukraine and the preservation of lives. while russian and by their participation in competitions, belarusian athletes increase the propaganda of a bloody war, ukrainian athletes die on the battlefield. or, returning home with victories,

they see destructive ones. and destiny, i call on the sports community to act and prevent terrorist athletes from international sports, it has been a long time, it's time to act, silence kills, this story is about the occupation of kherson region. residents of the kherson region saw endless columns of enemy vehicles and people entering from the crimea. who did not wait for the invaders, they put him on a ptr and took him somewhere. on i walk along the path, a tank is coming at me. what were one step away from death? and he ran at the age of 76, and the one with the machine gun was behind him and shouted, i will shoot you. but they did not despair and fought for every life. people began to be ferried to zalicha by rubber boat. they waited for

the ukrainian military. documentary film deoccupation november 12 at 10:15 p.m. exclusively on the air of edynyi novyn i am a russian military ship, i offer to lay down weapons and. the itch of ukraine and the glory of fate will smile at us brothers, they will throw away our little ones. like dew in

the sun, i will rule my brothers in my side, soul and body, in a peaceful state. and we will show you what brothers are of the cossack race.