[000:00:00;00] obligations, but again, here you can help the ministry of justice, and how to help the ministry of justice in extradition, i will emphasize once again, people, if you do not know, i received an answer at one time from, let's say, from the ukrainian bureau of interpol, how many times have you applied to interpol regarding yanukovych was first contacted once, yanukovych was contacted once, and interpol wrote absolutely clearly that the documents you submitted testify to the political motives of the persecution, unfortunately this is how the system works, we need not technical solutions to adopt, we need to adopt legislation that will actually reform the law enforcement system, bring in professional people who will be able to professionally file documents for extradition and extradite criminals. thank you. thank you, european solidarity, honcharenko, oleksiy

oleksivych, please. oleksiy goncharenko, european solidarity, a very important bill, i invite everyone to vote for it, because it is a very special bill for some special people. tolik shariy, how do you feel there? barcelona? we are already preparing a law for you that you will have a separate cell , everything will be as it should be, don't be afraid, go back home to ukraine , boy, come back, you don't need to be afraid, you don't need your lawyers to tell you how scary it will be for you in ukraine , because bombs are falling there, and in prisons, something terrible

is happening, you won't be afraid, tolik. come, it won't look like that, it won't look like that to barcelona, ​​to the sea, but at home, on native land, it's important, muraiv, come, where are you hiding there, there is a special law for you, everything is fine, kiva, come, of course not the hall of the supreme council, but you will be able to learn your skills, you know how to do it, come, please, and be in our prison, we also have a special law for you now, we accept, naumov, who used to take diamonds to us , diamonds, no, it was the head, one of the heads of the sbu of ukraine, come, finally you will have a face-to-face meeting with bakanov, talk together about who took which diamonds from the muscovites in order to sell the homeland, and then flee somewhere to serbia or somewhere , we

will prepare everything here for you, for everyone, guys, are we waiting for you, for everyone, here in ukraine, this is your home, this is your native land, you will do something useful for society, we have all adopted laws, so please come as soon as possible, we have not forgotten about you and we will find you, we can proceed to voting, then we proceed to voting, dear colleagues. take your seats, please, economic colleagues, take your seats, please, i am putting to the vote a proposal to introduce some, to adopt as a basis a draft law on introducing amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine, regarding the provision of observance of the rights and freedoms of convicted citizens

of ukraine, transferred. to serve a sentence , as well as, in respect of which the competent authority of a foreign state has made a decision to extradite them to ukraine, extradite them for prosecution or execution of a sentence, registration number 9451 as a basis, please vote. for 299, the decision was made, the draft law was adopted as a basis, i propose to halve the deadline for submitting proposals for amendments to prepare for the second reading, please vote for 261, the decision was made, next, colleagues, we have

frame. there are questions, we begin with the appointment of a member and a deputy of the advisory group of experts, dear colleagues, in accordance with article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. article 10:2 of the law of ukraine on the constitutional court of ukraine, the verkhovna rada appoints one person to the advisory group of experts and elects its deputy. the verkhovna rada of ukraine, in accordance with part 17 of article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, considers the issue of electing a deputy member of the advisory group of experts according to a similar procedure, as for a member of the advisory group of experts. in accordance with the fourth part of article 285 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the deputy factions of the group submit proposals regarding candidates for the vacant positions of a member of the advisory board of experts and his deputy. the parliamentary faction of the servant of the people political party submitted a proposal regarding the candidacy of natalya semenivna kuznitsova for the position of member of the advisory group of experts, the candidacy of shakun vasyl ivanovych for the position of deputy member of the advisory group of experts. committee on legal issues

politicians at their meeting, protocol number 143, considered the relevant candidacies. in accordance with part nine of article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, you were provided with all the necessary documents regarding the candidates through sydo. according to the fourth part of article 20 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the issue is included in the agenda of the extraordinary session without a vote. in accordance with paragraph two of the first part of article 28 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine , it is proposed to combine the discussion of issues on the appointment of a member of the advisory group of experts and election of his deputy and consider them according to the following procedure agreed upon by the conciliation council. report from the main committee on legal policy up to 3 minutes. speeches from deputy factions of groups up to 16 minutes, up to two minutes per speech, decision-making on the appointment of a member of the group of experts, decision-making on the election of a deputy member of the group of experts. colleagues, we need to approve this procedure proposed by the conciliation council, so i am putting to a vote the proposed procedure for consideration of this issue by the conciliation council,

we need 226, please vote for the procedure, paton. for 256, thank you, the decision has been made, we will proceed according to the appropriate procedure, before the start , colleague pavlish asks to give him the floor to voice the conflict of interests, please , dear colleagues, i respect the candidates, the advisory group of experts, this is really very important issue, and the verkhovna rada should have representatives there to delegate then, because all other bodies that were supposed to delegate have already determined their representatives, but in connection with a potential conflict interests, due to the fact that i have submitted documents for participation in the competition for a judge

of the constitutional court, i will not take part in the discussion and voting on this issue, thank you, thank you, and kopelenko oleksandr lyubimovych, please. i would also like to say that, taking into account the potential conflict of interests, i will not participate in either the discussion or the vote, thank you, let's move on to the discussion, to the floor for the report, the chairman of the committee on right-wing policy, denys vyacheslavovych maslov is invited up to 3 minutes please thank you colleagues, you know, but the first recommendation of the european commission was precisely the recommendation to change the selection procedures for the position of judge of the constitutional court, i will not emphasize again the importance of such an institution

as the constitutional court, on the contrary, i want to thank each of you, each of the people's deputies. in fact, thanks to all of you, we've completed that first recommendation. and changed the selection procedure for the post of judge of the constitutional court, which was confirmed yesterday by the corresponding report and decision of the european commission, which fully recognized fulfilled this requirement and even more , they noted that ukraine has established truly transparent conditions for competitive selection for the post of judge of the constitutional court, all subjects have already...' delegated their representatives to the donor group of experts, the last subject remained, and this namely the supreme council of ukraine. let 's take this step today and eventually appoint a member

of the appropriate group of experts and his deputy, especially since we didn't even have alternatives for candidates. so, taking into account the discussion at our committee with as the first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada already noted, the committee submitted for consideration the candidate semenivna for the position of member of the advisory group of experts. in its conclusion, the committee notes that natalya semenivna kuznitsova fully meets the requirements for a member of the advisory group of experts. as of today, she is a doctor of legal sciences, a professor of the department of civil law, kyiv national university named after taras shevchenko, a full academician. of the national academy of legal sciences, the same

procedure provides for the appointment of a deputy, member of the advisory group of experts. according to the committee's decision, the candidacy of vasyl ivanovych chakun was submitted for consideration by the verkhovna rada, who, as of today, is a doctor of legal sciences, an associate professor, a professor of the department of criminal law of the national ukraine, a valid academician member of the national academy of legal sciences. we really presented worthy candidates today, so i ask you to support them and vote, and finally, thank you, please sign up for speeches in the parliamentary factions

of the groups. stepan ivanovych, european solidarity, i would like to give the floor to iryna gerashchenko, iryna volodymyrivna gerrashchenko, please. dear colleagues, it is really important that the european commission recommended the start of official negotiations regarding ukraine's accession to the eu, and the creation of an independent, non-partisan constitutional court is one of the seven mandatory prerequisites for this

. the court on the creation of an advisory group of experts, trying to squeeze it into its sphere of banking influence, and european solidarity in particular insisted that the group consisted of eight people, by the way, and was formed according to the principle of the group that elects judges of the anti-corruption court, so that there was the presence of international independent experts. unfortunately, you blocked these votes three times, and only under the influence and pressure of our european partners in brussels, did you make the right decision. but what do we have today regarding the constitutional court. servants of the people were elected to the constitutional court despite the demand for its non-partisanship and apliticity of your representatives. ms. sovgyru from violation of legislation. and now we are glad that we started.

finally select the representative group of experts, but we insist on the implementation of the mandatory rule on the involvement of international, independent, professional experts, who are not here, these interconnected connections, the influence on them of banking, daily telephone law, you know, reports there in the offices of the bank, about which judges should be represented in the constitutional court, who does not have the right to be there? therefore, it is very important that we meet the copenhagen criteria and build independent, strong institutions, democracy, freedom of speech, and the main court of the country, the constitutional court was professional, thank you, servant of the people of zaremskyi, maslov, please, to be honest, unfortunately, the previous speaker cannot put honey in a barrel.

not to add a spoonful of your filth, you know when , when, when even the venice commission, the european commission, in the report of the venice commission, in the report of the european commission, thanks the ukrainian authorities, i emphasize, the authorities, for their constructive position on this issue, and says that this is correct a high-quality, absolutely bill, i don't understand our coming... you go to the rostrum again on this important issue and try to manipulate it again about three allegedly added something there and so on for 10 months, including personally working with the venice commission. believe me, we also defended the ukrainian position, where there are three national experts and three international experts, maintaining a balance between national interests and the trust of international partners and their

recommendations. and the ukrainian authorities were congratulated for this by the venice commission, and the european commission. if you talk about that. that three times someone allegedly corrected something, then remember the history of the venice commission, how many times during its lifetime the venice commission changed the recommendations three times on one and the same bill, we carried out for you, i explain, we carried out additional recommendations of the venice commission, so please, colleagues, this an important step, we are completing the procedure of forming an advisory group of experts today and choosing the best candidates for the constitutional court in an open, transparent and fair competition, then what could have been done since 2016, thank you, we can move on to, yes, the homeland,

please, serhii volodymyrovychka, someone else will speak, other factions of the trust group, the future. no trust, no future, mr. chairman, they are still with us in the hall, so let's go, can you give me a zero , first, please, thank you, mr. chairman, in fact, this is a vote, this is not a vote regarding natalya semenivna and vasyl ivanovich, which we as a faction respect very much, colleagues, name me at least one country in the world that is completely independent and sovereign, where foreigners influence the selection of constitutional court judges. name me at least one country in the world, why ukrainians consider them inferior, why can't we ukrainians ourselves , without any additional advice, elect six members of the advisory group, why can't we do it ourselves? that is, we can defend eastern europe ourselves, but

we cannot elect an advisory group. now about the task force. i want to remind you that the first, golden, as it is called, is the composition of constitutions. the court was elected without any advisory groups, without any advisory groups, but it was the best composition of the constitutional court for the entire history of independent ukraine. i think that all authorities should stop, this authority is not an exception, all authorities wanted to control the constitutional court, many authorities fired judges of the constitutional court illegally, judges were then reinstated through the court, recognized the decree. of the president as invalid, but the next government stepped on the same rake again and again illegally dismissed the judges of the constitutional court, so it is necessary to deprive the constitutional court of political influence, and the example set with judge savgyriy, is an absolutely eloquent testimony to the fact that no one is going to deprive the constitutional court of political

influence, again political appointees, again among their own and so on, therefore, with all due respect to you nataliya semenina. with all due respect to you, vasyl ivanovych, we will not be able to support your candidacies, but the very approach to the formation of the advisory group of experts, thank you, colleagues, invite the deputies to the hall, please, colleagues who are pressing davyd georgiyovych for their seats , please. dear colleagues, in accordance with part 12 of article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the appointment of a person to the donor group of experts is carried out by the verkhovna rada by open voting in two stages: first a rating vote, then voting for the appointment of a person as a member of the advisory group of experts.

voting for the election of a deputy is carried out in the same manner. so, let's move on to rating voting. take your seats, please. well, the absence of opponents does not cancel the rating vote, this is not written in the regulations, dear colleagues, in accordance with part 12 of article 285 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, i am putting the candidacy of natalya semenivna kuznitsova to the position of a member

of the advisory group. experts, please vote. for 220, i.e. we have the winner of the ranking vote, and we proceed to the final vote , i ask the people's deputies to prepare for the vote, in accordance with article 285 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, article 10:2 of the law of ukraine on the constitutional court, i put to the vote a proposal on the importance of a member of the advisory group of experts , kuznitsova natalya semenivna, i ask you to vote for 227 decisions have been made, congratulations by factions , congratulations natalya semenivna. in accordance with part 16 of article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, i ask the main committee together with

the staff to draw up a resolution based on the consequences of your decision. now we proceed to the election of a deputy, a member of the advisory group of experts. i am putting shakun vasyl ivanovych's candidacy for the position of deputy member of the advisory group of experts to a rating vote. please vote. vasyl ivanovych shakun. and vasyl ivanovych shakun won in the rating voting, gaining 223 votes. therefore, let's move on to voting as a whole. in accordance with article 2085 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, article 102 of the law of ukraine on the constitutional court, i am putting to the vote the proposal for the election of a deputy. member of the advisory group of experts

shakun vasyl ivanovych, i ask you to vote for 228, the decision has been made, congratulations to vasyl ivanovych, i ask the main committee together with the apparatus to draw up a resolution according to the consequences our decision. dear colleagues, by factions, please show your thanks, and we congratulate the members of the advisory group of experts , we remind you once again that this is also the result of our european integration, because we made these decisions with you as part of the fulfillment of seven promises, dear colleagues, we continue to ... the question, in accordance with clause 12, part one of article 85 of the constitution of ukraine, the verkhovna rada of ukraine has the authority

to resolve issues of resignation of members of the cabinet of ministers of ukraine. november 8, 2023 of the year, vadym markovych goodsayt, in accordance with paragraph one of the first part of article 18 of the law of ukraine on the cabinet of ministers of ukraine, submitted an application to the verkhovna rada of ukraine with a request to accept his resignation from the position of minister of youth and sports of ukraine, in accordance with the fourth part of article 20 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the issue is included in the agenda of the extraordinary session without a vote, the relevant materials have been provided or sent to you. dear colleagues, i propose to consider this issue according to a shortened procedure. for 211, the decision has been made, we proceed to the consideration of the issue, the floor is given to the minister of youth and sports of ukraine vadym markovych

goodsayt for three minutes, dear presidium, please. dear people's deputies, i am standing here for the first time in almost four years, first of all, i want to thank our armed forces for defending our country, and we can now work, each at his job, i want to thank you, a lot was done almost during the four years that i headed the ministry of youth and sports. who i worked with, of you intersected, there were many ideas

that we implemented and managed to do it, i want to say to the profile committee and the head of the profile committee that we have done a lot for the development of the field of physical culture and sports and youth. i want to note that during these difficult years, as much as the president's programs were initiated and implemented and youth programs were implemented, for ukraine's independence, there was no such work as we did, but when a minister or a political figure takes office , the countdown to his resignation begins, and on unfortunately, covid and now a full-scale war did not allow us to do what we could have done more, but everything is fine, we kept

sports, we kept sports in ukraine, our athletes, our s... games in birmingham won 45 medals during war at the third european games, our national team took the third overall team place and won 41 medals. at the 21st olympic games , our national team won twice as many medals as at the previous games in rio de janeiro. we worked, we met with young people, we developed programs for the return of our youth. but you still need to move forward. i want to thank you all, i want to thank the people of ukraine, the armed forces for what was done. and finally, i want to say, to assure you, as i worked, for the state, i will work. a month ago, i had a personal meeting with the president of the international olympic committee, thomas bach. there was

a productive conversation, in relation to which i urged not to allow the russians. and asked them to suspend the russian olympic committee from the international olympic committee for the fact that they created councils in our occupied territories, the president, he said that they will consider this issue, give me a minute to finish, and a week later they considered this issue, they suspended. olympic committee, temporarily from the international movement. i want to point out to you that this work was joint with you, together with the people of ukraine, and we will continue this work, and i will personally continue this work in the national olympic committee. glory to ukraine, thank you. glory to the heroes, thank you

for a co-report, the first deputy chairman is invited. to the committee on youth and sports belynyuk zhan olynsanovych, please, thank you, dear chairman, dear colleagues, the committee of the verkhovna rada of ukraine on youth and sports, according to the mandate of the first deputy chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine oleksandr kornienko, considered the statement of the minister of youth and sports of ukraine vadym markovych kuzait about his resignation. during the discussion , the committee members emphasized the achievements of the work carried out, in this difficult time, by the minister of youth and sports, vadymo markovych website, regarding the development of physical culture and sports and opposition to attempts to return russian athletes to international

competitions. we all know that vadym markovych is still the president of the national olympic committee, i think that on... the eve of the olympic games in paris it will be good to focus your attention on the preparation of the national team specifically for the olympic games, so i personally and we as a committee wished yesterday success in this field. the committee on youth and sports adopted the result of the review the decision to recommend the verkhovna rada of ukraine to decide on the resignation of the minister of youth and sports of ukraine khutsait vadym markovych by voting at the plenary session of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. thank you all for your attention. thank you, please sign up, two for, two against.