[000:00:00;00] they talk to their people, and then other people talk to this people, political experts, military experts, some of them have already started talking, you see, and then, well, it turns out such a crooked mirror, a distorted truth, and of course it is better, but even now, you know , it seems to me that valery fedorovych took a step, as he did a year ago, to meet the world community, he explained what is happening on the russian-ukrainian front, he told ... but it would be good to talk to the ukrainians and explain that he means that ukrainians do not get lost in their thoughts and that they are different experts and pseudo-experts did not interpret his article in an absolutely polar way, in an absolutely polar way, you understand, and ukrainians did not have even more questions after this article, now you are asking me whether it is a dead end or not, you are asking how a ukrainian woman is, then you have been given the answers to all questions or not? before i came to the studio, i received a call

from someone, let's say from the managers in the office... are you really at a dead end? mr. general, the discussion that they are trying to impose from the president's office sounds something like this, and why is zaluzhny tells the whole truth about what is happening at the front, and where is the line between what zaluzhny can say about what is happening at the front and what needs to be said, what is he silent about and what is he talking about, and is it necessary to i want to tell people the whole truth, right? as it is, and not to clog up the only telethon there with some kind of victorious coverage and not to have a serious discussion with people, because people, as you said correctly, in some regions simply do not understand that there is a war and that it is necessary to prepare for a possible offensive of a further offensive russian federation?

these gentlemen and ladies, who spoke directly in the previous story, do not understand, and constantly told the people that the war is ending, that the weak enemy has already lost, and during the past year and the first half of this year , such a perception was also formed, you know society of the frivolity of this war, and this trouble is now regurgitating them, i’m sorry, i won’t say it in another way, and they don’t know what to do now, and when our commander-in-chief valery fedorovych, the diligent one , after all, has already voiced the problem and not just voiced, and voiced the ways of solving these problems, you know, it scared them, because they were telling and hanging one thing in our ears, and then the one who directly leads the war, is responsible for the war, spoke and clearly said that not everything is good, and that a lot still needs to be done and a lot of work needs to be done on those mistakes that were made earlier, the question is the improvement of the ratings of this government, and

at the moment they are trying to say, but where and in this studio to tell the hard worker what can be said, which is not possible, because when in february of last year, luzhnyy together with ukrainian people defended ukraine, then these people, who were clearly not in the borders of kyiv and the kyiv region, and for us it is necessary to understand that, dear ones, those who believed in the previous, you know, fairy tales, the time has probably come, you already know, in yourself and understand that the propaganda that existed and introduced you to the green light did not lead to success, primarily to your perception of the realities of the situation, and if we want to remain a free and independent state, then let's listen to those who lead this war, namely directly military and to listen to the one who is fully responsible for this war, namely general zaluzhnyi, and it is precisely him with his truth, which is exactly

the indicator we watched in the media and in social networks, how they tried, well, roughly speaking, to attack zaluzhnyi , and a lot of different information appeared, and the people's deputy of ukraine , maryana bezugla, tried to say something about zaluzhny, then andriy senchenko made some publications about zaluzhny, about what zaluzhny says, about what he does, natalka mosiychuk, yesterday she interviewed yermak again, prepares the resignation of the zaluzhyu, to which yermak literally said the following, i quote, i did not hear that zelensky wanted to replace the zaluzhyu , i do not have such information, but considering your experience, you also had experience communicating with this team, this experience was not entirely positive , and when they came to power, you were in the position of deputy secretary of the national security and defense council, then

they returned you, what do you say about how, how they solve these issues, how, how is this discussion, is it happening in them , about how to lead, who can lead. who can't to manage, how it happens and does it mean that if yermak said that he did not hear that zelsky wanted to change the industrious, then they will not change the industrious, but will change the industrious, they will say, oh, we don’t know, something, it is probably the minister of defense do such a presentation, you understand it, surely, as a physical already, not so much a physical, but a mental illness, when people lied to themselves and lie to others and believe themselves, so there is nothing to comment on, all their previous actions are examples the one when they fired people,

you know, when they injected and pressed in the back, that starting with the last example directly, general muzhenko, general pavlovsky was also removed at one time , i was also called at the same time , there are many more such examples, so i will honestly say, as stanislavsky said there, i do not believe that they they say i don't believe it, because i'm lying so much that, you know, we were blindsided, but with khorenko, this whole story happened, by accident, as i understand it, because the commander-in-chief did not sign the order, or one of the commanders of the special forces, special operations forces, deputy commander, you, you, mr. general, do you understand why horrenk was dismissed? unfortunately, the situation is that the office of the president , his leadership is trying to select people who are obedient and manageable and

predictable for certain leadership positions, and accordingly, general kharenko ceased to fit the status that they directly asked for him and became more independent and began to defend certain interests of the special operations forces, especially as regards their use, and this worried the leadership of the president's office, plus the fact that general kharenka was also frightened that office of the president, and that is why one of the factors that led to the removal of general lakharenka, and most importantly, again, you know, so meanly without saying anything to anyone, they put on the fact, well, first of all, this is disrespect to general kharenka, it is not respect for forces of special operations, this is not respect for the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, as he had to directly decide the issue, it is his subordination to the commanders of the types and branches of the armed forces, and it is he who determines whether

their actions are necessary or professional or not, and when it is decided on mountains, on banking hills, then this just shows that the people who are sitting there, well, first of all, they have no real military experience and no service... here, so their strong, powerful and independent personalities are very frightening, to which, mr. general, this can lead, this kind of personnel policy, we remember how before the second world war, something similar happened in the soviet union, when generals were accused of cooperation with foreign special services, there in the 30s a lot of generals were shot, thank god, they are not shot in our country. but they are removed they are not given another job. that is, i understand that you were not invited to work after your release, although you were one of those who defended the zhulyan airport, when you and other generals are not

involved in the defense of ukraine, and why were you not again invited, despite all the differences, right here the question is about life and death, about whether ukraine will be or not ukraine, this is a question about whether we can or will lose, this is exactly the question, the answer to this question is quite simple, they have personal ambitions are ahead of state necessity, they are jealous of the fact that general zaluzhnyi will be the general of victory, and there will not be a generalissimo of victory, which volodymyr zelenskyi, generalissimo volodymyr zelenskyi can be, a good joke, thank you, mr. general. but today there was a meeting of the supreme commander, they talked about the production of ammunition, the production of weapons and the fact that it is necessary to strengthen the pppo over the kherson region, or over kherson,

uh, aren’t such conclusions and reports too late, well, taking into account the fact that already two years of war. well, unfortunately, about those problems that now they are coming to the surface, i started saying since the spring of last year and constantly reported to certain leaders what to pay attention to and how to implement it, the authorities did not respond to this, they tried to fill the ears of the ukrainian people with such sweet water, telling that the victory will be tomorrow and the day after tomorrow we will already be in the crimea drinking coffee, on the yalton embankment. meanwhile, the situation was that we can lie to ourselves, and the realities show, show that what if the state, i emphasize, the state does not take part in to the full extent in the war, then there will be no benefit, and it is quick and easy... if there are problems in the country

, then these problems are immediately reflected in the army, no more, no less, and instead of dealing with serious problems, the government is strengthened , i emphasize, she stole, stole and stole, directly those scandals that are now surfacing under the previous leadership of the minister of defense and those billions, already in the billions of dollars, that were leaked as a result . took out more than 40 billion hryvnias, and this is a terrible amount, but if you consider the issue much wider and look at how the money of local budgets and other ministries was used, we will see that just a huge, huge layer of managers of various levels do not think, are not statesmen in their essence, but are directly, you know, such as they say in russian vremenshchiks, who try to make money under noise, is responsible for these people, well, how can she

oppress and persecute those people who, together with her, are the same as them and are the same as they are robbing our state , and this one the problem is, if you count how much money was spent, or stolen , and spent as intended, you can imagine how many tanks, the same, just tanks, how many rockets, how many shells could be purchased, it’s even hard to imagine, do the math yourself , stole directly more than a billion dollars only from the ministry of defense, and one tank, a german leopard, costs 12 million, so count how many leopards we could buy, what a powerful, armored wall we were walking, we could go on the offensive, even despite those the mines themselves fields, i am not saying how many shells we could pour on the head of the enemy, the russian federation, who continue

to work directly without orders, and i ask the question, but where are our super pr people from certain intelligence organizations, who, instead of directly destroying these enterprises, they talk about small ones, which have absolutely no direct significance from my point of view, these landings, except for pr in crimea, they have no need for it. thank you, mr. general. forces of ukraine, former deputy secretary of the council of national security and defense. friends, we are continuing our broadcast on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our platforms on youtube and facebook, for those who are currently watching us live on youtube and facebook, i encourage you to like this video so that the video is trending youtube and facebook, well, take part in our vote on youtube, we are asking you today about whether you trust... on youtube, i see that 98% of those who voted

trust zaluzhno, in addition, we conduct the same survey by phone during broadcast and we also ask you whether you trust the head of the armed forces of ukraine zaluzhny, yes 0800 211-381, no, 0.800 211382, but we see that 95% of those who are already about yaki on these numbers are free. volodymyr tsybulko, political expert, people's deputy of ukraine, of the fourth convocation, will be with us later on the air. mr. volodymyr, i congratulate you and i am glad to see you on our air. congratulations, congratulations. mr. volodymyr. over the course of the week , we saw how they tried to roll out the political technology, forgive valery zaluzhny, the head of the armed forces of ukraine, for such a word.

first in ukraine. andriy senchenko, then there were also opinion leaders in social networks, then it all spilled over to russia, russia got involved, ours already played along, they started the same thing there, we are asking about trust in the head of the armed forces of ukraine, and i want to ask you how a person , which is related to political technologies, here is what they are trying to do with zelenskyi, and what the result of this party should be , the resignation of zelenskyi, well, here it must be understood that the bank's action acted according to a certain... logic of forming such an image from zelenskyi military leader, but objectively, taking into account the weakness of state institutions, except for the armed forces, churchill, who is engaged

exclusively in war, that is, people are impressed by the fact that general zaluzhnyi remains a military professional and nothing else, he does not study anywhere else, which means that what the more professional a person is, the more effectively he is engaged in his professional activity, the more trust he will have. let's see how it works in general, all these 20-plus months of war, the political power, it constantly switches attention from its specialized activities to something else another thing, our minister of finance marchenko assures for... them partners that we have the lowest level of corruption in the last 20 years , wait, what is marchenko, the head of nabu, or nazk, why is he not talking about finances, he is talking about corruption, in our country, for example, and in fact acts as the minister of energy, and not

as the minister of foreign affairs, and this is enough, let's say, throws people into such a situation. uncertainty, when they see general zaluzhny, who acts clearly within the limits of competence and acts efficiently and responsibly, they, well, let's say, increase him to the level of such and political leadership, too, why was this publication in the economist so maddened by the bank itself, as such a narrow-profile one, in which general zaluzhny does not go beyond the limits... well , let's say, military needs, he talks about military needs, about the needs of the army, about the need to win, but this caused an incredible panic at the bank , why actually, that is, it seems to me that the bank

fell into a big trap, they were playing this impersonation of great activity, or activated activity, but everyone responded not for their own, not for their own profile, everyone was commenting not on their profile activity , and it just blows people's brains out, that's why there is such a distrust of any bank's actions, which act more or less honestly, even in those situations the bank does not trust, let's see, we now have the prospect of becoming a member of the european union, and right before our eyes, the bank , seemingly in the interests of ukraine, is fooling western partners, talking about the fact that at 90 there, well, that we have fully voted,

prepared all seven criteria, votes the european commission appreciates assuring ukrainians that the authorities are now consolidating their efforts in order to accept these necessary three criteria and that from december 14 we will begin: er, well, a full-fledged dialogue on the acquisition of full membership of ukraine in the european union, we are now told by all kinds of fairy tales, instead of being clearly performed and told in a partner-like manner, it is predicted, because in order to mislead , well, a rival or an adversary, but also to constantly mislead one's own people and one's own voter, er then ee at the voter there is a suspicion that the politician considers his voter to be his enemy, or, let's say, not an enemy, not quite intelligent, let's say, this is like an option, well, look, the same election day during the war, then a few

statements of minor officials or there representatives of the president's office, then dmytro kuleba, the minister of foreign affairs, said last week that we do not rule out the possibility of such an election , and he said this in an interview with a television company, and this week volodymyr zelenskyy says: well, listen, as much as possible already shake up the situation in ukraine, even if there are no elections, we have to fight, we have to win, and it seems that this whole topic did not come from representatives of the monomajority, but from someone else, that is, we did not do this, we asked whether do we want elections, no, no, we did not want to, although before that they threw this story, this story was discussed for a very long time by various tv channels, social networks, they gave their opinion, or why, for what, in your opinion, what not there will be,

there will be no elections, just as yermak said yesterday that, i don't know that he would fire the hard-working or wanted to fire, zelenskyi, i don't have such information, but the fact remains that they can fire the hard worker, and they can announce elections next year, or not? well then how they acted in the field of elections is a really strange story, because at first there was a strange statement, for the romanian media, by zelensky that if the elections are held during the war, then i will leave, i will not leave my country, but if after the war, then i will not participate, well, roughly so, that is, the situation began to play out, banking... stretching, how would she avoid elections and

retain power, because with regard to the verkhovna rada, the situation here is more or less unambiguous, the legislation provides for a change in the composition of the parliament, after legal elections, since elections cannot be held during martial law, here, well, this primacy or primacy the verkhovna rada remains, and the council. president, there is no such principle here, because we have a parliamentary-presidential republic and the parliament is the basis, so to speak, of the continuation of this or that power, and now zelensky is put on a big stretch, because finally they played, played and made a guess regarding the cost of the elections, which they themselves were afraid of, because before zelensky's statement that they were not necessary... the cost of next year's elections, how much they are worth, how much they will cost,

and when the sum of 9 was named, 5 billion, this , so to speak, knocked out of balance even such twisted people who sit on the banks, not to mention the fact that the opponents of the government are also quite experienced politicians, but in my opinion the amount of 9.5 billion scared the banks more , than, that is, when life returns them to some kind reality, and not in the information bubble in which they sometimes find themselves, or try to burden the whole society, then , sometimes you hear realistic assessments from them, but the same fair suddenly appeared in the media and talked about four criteria that are , well , zelensky demands in the area of ​​elections. for several months, all kinds of rumors were spread about the preparations for the elections, but the most important

thing is what yarmak says about trust, so we started our dialogue with trust, that is , after zelenskyi made a statement that we don't need elections, an instruction to prepare political passports just arrived from the bank. to our tv viewers, what does the political passport of the territory mean, so that the viewers understand what the political passport means, it is, first, the presence of media resources in a certain territory, then, the configuration of local councils, where the councils were formed according to the party principle, not according to the majoritarian, there is, about the configuration of factions, uh, where there are voters, there, in fact, it doesn't matter, deputies, even if they are majoritarian, they are somehow connected with

by one party or another, that is, it is the configuration of political forces in a certain territory, then the media resources they possess, political sponsors, which finances, which of the local, say, rich people they can operate on. nationals in the territory, what channels do the residents of the territory watch, what media do they read, what internet resources do they read, then, well, a certain list of such, well, public figures who can shape public sentiment, in short, this is all a toolkit for to organize