wisely promote aid to ukraine, and this aid will definitely reach ukraine. this is just a short-term political struggle that is currently going on in washington, but which will not ultimately result in ukraine getting nothing. the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, general valery zaluzhnyi, published certain theses in the economist, yes, and rather, we see the key problem, this is a problem. resources and the issue of strategic weapons that could change the current situation in the war in our favor, we understand that our enemy possesses extremely large resources, we are talking about military resources, we are talking about financial resources and about technological resources, we need correspondingly relevant support, i certainly agree with you that president putin is betting on the fact that he will be able to reorient the entire russian economy to

continued production of weapons, while the united states and its european allies will continue to provide ukraine with both the tactically and strategically important weapons that you mentioned. we should look at how successful ukraine is has recently been showing itself. even if general zaluzhny is talking about a stalemate, which we will now return to, despite the fact that there has not been much progress on land, i mean that, but in the black sea the situation is much more positive for ukraine, before all this we still back, what i'm trying to say is that the more accurate, long-range weapons that the united states and other nato allies are providing to ukraine are having a powerful effect on degrading russian naval capabilities, and that's really important. however, over time some people start

get tired of giving. this is one of the key reasons why it is so important that ukraine continues to make progress on the battlefield. dear mr. ambassador, in any case, you know extremely well how the american political and military establishment thinks, how the pentagon thinks, how the white house thinks, we understand that general zaluzhnyi actually sent an extremely powerful message. extremely powerful signal. i think that some of the american genosecurity in the white house also read them correctly, but it will still depend on the people who will put their signature, this is the president of the united states, this is the head of the congress, if , of course, the congressmen vote, then the issue of strategic targeted aid to ukraine in order to change the course of the war. exactly.

the american military establishment simultaneously understands the deep strategic implications of defeating russia. can we talk about what it means to defeat russia? and the vast majority of members of the united states congress would agree. the problem lies in us domestic politics. many american voters do not really understand what is happening in the ukraine. they have been hearing about it for almost two years, and now a new problem for israel has appeared. and that's why they got tired. from war in general. this is why president biden has so decisively led the united states to continue supporting ukraine, and he finds support in the majority of high-ranking officials in the us congress. however, there is a cohort of eight republicans who are trying to get voters' attention and shift the country's attention to themselves by saying that maybe the united states should stop supporting ukraine. what bothers me a little more now than at the time our talking to you, this is the new speaker

of the house of representatives. at that time, we predicted that , from the point of view of helping ukraine, a lot would depend on who would become the next speaker of the house of representatives of the us congress. that of the two potential candidates, one is very supportive of aid to ukraine, and the other is not. well, none of them were chosen. whoever was elected is a big supporter of president trump, and... trump, as we know, wants an immediate end to the war, and he will push for that if he is elected president, even though he it will not succeed, it shows that he would not want to continue supporting ukraine, so with the exception of this very powerful person, the speaker of the house of representatives, i think the political elite in the american government understand how important it is that the united states continue to support ukraine and

in fact there is no need to reduce support for ukraine, especially since there is a big game going on, in just a few days there will be a meeting between president joseph bye in san francisco. and chinese leader xi jinping and we will obviously hear there are a lot of different correct protocol statements, but the key story is how they will look at what in simple language is called spheres and zones of influence, so we understand that two superpowers are able to communicate in the person of their presidents, we understand that we can only outline this the perimeter along which the american president and the leader of china will move and at the same time, how can it... directly affect the russian aggression against ukraine. thank you for such a smart question. so the purpose of the meeting in san francisco is to try to find a way reducing the degree of high tension in us-china relations. we all

remember house speaker nancy pelosi's visit to taiwan in the past. i mean, he couldn't stop her from going because of the separation of powers in the us, but he could. to put political pressure on her, and yet he allowed her to go. so this visit created, in my opinion, unnecessary additional attention in the us-china relationship. since then , there have been a series of visits by american ministers to china trying to find ways that the us and china can not only reduce political tensions, but also cooperate on certain issues, for example, in the fight against climate change. so i expect there will be some discussion about climate change and how to mitigate the effects of the us-china trade war, because we all remember that president trump imposed tariffs on chinese imports into the us, starting a trade war, which

biden continued and xi jinping didn't like all of that, so i think xi jinping will want to hear from biden what he plans to do with to do to reduce trade tensions , therefore, president biden will naturally look for ways to persuade china to reduce its support for russia's war in ukraine, and will likely emphasize that the red line for the united states is to provide china with russian weapons. china is not doing this, china is a way to counter the influence of the united states in the world and strengthen china's influence, but it is definitely not interested in the war in ukraine intensifying, or in ukraine losing, because ukraine is also an important trading partner for china, and of course, they will to talk about taiwan, which, like ukraine , will be an important part of this discussion, i think

president biden will remind president xi that if china attacks taiwan, we can see a desperate fight and high morale of the taiwanese people. following the example of the country after russian troops invaded its territory. so this meeting is a combination of the desire to reduce tension and the desire to cooperate with each other. at the same time , biden will definitely deter xi jinping from supplying russia with weapons or from attacking taiwan. there are feelings, you know well, that's how it is in politics, when you can't solve this or that specific problem now, you can... postpone it so that someone after you in the next political cycle starts to solve it, yes, and we in ukraine are waiting for very soon , very specific decisions, whether president joseph biden, taking into account the american election campaign, will take clear radical

pro-ukrainian steps. recently, biden just made dollars to support ukraine until the end of the year. after all, he contributes to the provision of weapons to ukraine, which. she needs, yes, it's not only f-16, and yet atakams will already work on enemy positions. previously , hymars and m1 abrams tanks were provided, so biden believes that he took a radical step by saying: ok, we want to provide ukraine with an additional $63 billion, to help in a step-by-step manner. if you look at it from the side and think about it in terms of how biden acted at the beginning of the war, when he was... debating whether or not to provide these long-range, high-precision weapons, i think that deep down in the hearts of biden and jake sullivan, there's always that if they take too radical a step, then russia can escalate to the level of using nuclear weapons, and this, in my opinion, is their main

mistake, to escalate to the nuclear level. when it comes to putin and the geography of his influence. so i actually believe that nowadays he is much less influential in central asia, in azerbaijan, in armenia, maybe he is more influential in georgia, which is a very difficult and problematic place. but you mentioned tokayev. do you remember how last year, when putin proclaimed the autonomy of the donetsk, luhansk, kherson and zaporizhia regions, kayev, who was from him on the same stage during the st. petersburg economic forum, refused to recognize the legitimacy of this move by putin, saying that he believed in territorial integrity. i have spoken to the leaders of some of the countries i just mentioned, and it is clear that they are no longer afraid of putin. a significant part of his influence and he is even somewhat in despair, because armenia is moving in a direction that he does not

like. this means that if putin visits armenia, he will have to be arrested there. prime minister pashinyan has repeatedly stated that russia is no longer their protector and that they cannot rely on russia. therefore, i think that if you look at this whole situation from a bird's eye view. then it will become clear that it is really bad for putin, while, as for ukraine, it is getting better and better. however, the key point is, as you rightly point out , the continued aid from the us, i think it will continue. we see how two strategies have been set in motion at the same time, these are the euro-atlantic strategy and the strategy of china and its allies. in particular, we say transparent, visible allies, vassals of china, or states that are now trying

to participate in the redistribution of resources and influence , that is, we are fighting a war, the united states managed to assemble what is called the euro-atlantic world, a large part of central europe, which was under the occupation of the soviet union , did not get there . now we see completely different players, and china looks much stronger than the russian federation. in general, if we are talking about the great american strategy of containing russia in ukraine, what can we expect, will there be, for example, have made it clear to hezbollah and iran that american carrier groups are not just approaching the coast, and if the ayatollah's government wants to escalate, then the united states will find a very clear missile response. in today's world, it usually happens between the united states

, with its post-war view of open markets, free trade, expansion of political and economic to be able to set new rules that will allow beijing to have much more control over other countries, not to mention the taiwan question. returning to middle east, i completely agree with you that the us deployment of these two carrier battle groups was intended to send a message to hezbollah and its patron iran that if you expand the war into israel's gaza strip, the united states will not hesitate to respond, wants to restore hezbollah again, he seeks, firstly, to control most of lebanon's politics, and secondly, to have great influence in syria. so iran doesn't want to lose the hezbollah asset, and it's about what we talked about a few minutes ago, about the nuclear containment.

hezbollah can cause a lot of pain and death to israel, but as soon as iran dares to do so, hezbollah will be destroyed, and so iran wants to maintain this deterrent in order to be able to influence events not only in israel, but also beyond, in the middle east . . we've also seen iranian proxies resort to limited action, such as the houthis shooting down a us drone in yemen, exposing them to a potentially serious counterattack from outside. the us, and if the us strikes back, it will be powerful a signal to iran that if hezbollah does something like this, it and iran will have a battle that it will never win, iran is aware of this, but it is not going to back down. and so ukraine actually has something to do with all of this, while the developing countries, or the so-called global south, are watching this, wondering why the united states and its european allies aren't giving... giving more support to israel. if you follow how biden's statements have changed, then biden

actually warned israel, but more so israel attacks the palestinians in gaza and the west bank, the more support the opponents of the united states and europe receive when it comes to ukraine. and this causes concern for ukraine, however , iran does not want to fight with the united states. in your opinion, how firmly is ukraine now on the agenda of the united states, and whether the very unpleasant case of afghanistan might repeat itself, when it initially begins to decline. the level of financial support, yes, and after that there is a great and tragic parting, ie how serious is ukraine in the heart of the american establishment? afghanistan is not a very good comparison because the united states has been in afghanistan for 20 years and the situation there has gotten increasingly complicated. in ukraine, in my opinion, the tactics and technologies

of ukraine forced the russian black sea fleet to retreat, leave sevastopol and move to others. such as novorossiysk. yes, systematically, step by step, ukraine is making progress, regardless of whether we call the current situation on the ground a stalemate or not, and what the more high-precision and long-range american weapons available to ukraine, the greater this progress will be. i consider the security of the united states. as you know, i live here in turkey, and when president erdogan's team asked what i thought were the issues on which the united states and turkey could work together, the first issue on the list, back in january 2021, was ukraine. for biden , ukraine is really important, remember how he dealt with the issue in ukraine under president obama, and in general for biden, nato and

deterring russian aggression by solving global problems is where his foreign policy starts, for him everything starts with nato, and this is what concerns ukraine as a future nato member who is now fighting for nato to prevent russia from attacking its territory . biden knows it, secretary blinkin, national security adviser sullivan. they all act from this point of view. so, from the point of view of the executive branch, israel is of course a political issue, based on the domestic contemporary american politics. this is perhaps the most important thing a foreign policy issue that has always been so because of the jewish-american diaspora , because of morality, because of the holocaust, because of the fact that israel is a nuclear power, and also because of the fact that iran seeks to wipe israel off the face of the earth. that's why israel always gets out where there is a crisis, and that's how it sucks out all the juices. the

biden administration, as well as the understanding and conviction that russia must lose. unfortunately, i have to end our conversation, i am sincerely grateful to mr. ambasare bryze for this brilliant analysis on the air of the tv channel, i wish to our viewers to remind that matthew bryza, ex-adviser of the united states secretary of state, former director of europe-taurasia affairs at the us national security council, was currently working for them. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. why am i here i have sensitive teeth, eat ice cream, pain, cold air - pain, sweet, pain. the dentist prescribed lakalot sensitive, which effectively reduces tooth sensitivity. if i had known lacalot sensitive earlier, i would not have had to

come here at all. lacalot sensitive - reliable protection against pain. at gr, as a result of increased temperature, the body can drink water, so it is necessary to drink plenty of water. heavy drinking, i.e. drinking a lot? so. when regular water is not enough, i recommend reo. reo restores the water-electrolyte balance in the case of acute renal failure. the solution for abundant drinking is reo water. reo - water for special medical purposes. espresso celebrates its tenth anniversary in 2023. we are proud to present our new ethereal look. stay tuned for an updated espresso, because despite everything, we stay in touch. information hour on espresso tv channel continues our viewers, to whom we are infinitely grateful for their trust, are in touch with you. greetings, dear viewers, this is the big ether program on the espresso tv channel, magnetic storms. we are becoming even more dynamic, even more convenient. the information

day of the tv channel is in full swing. we are a modern design and sound, even more interesting programs and originals. the garrison of the occupiers was sharpened, cut off from the main forces and destroyed, they will try, our values ​​​​and the ukrainian view remain unchanged, times, in 10 years, youtube channel the espresso tv channel was watched by more than 205 million hours. in 10 years, the youtube channel of the tv channel received more than 6 million... there is a restaurant or a store at the shelter. is this normal so. in the fund of protective structures there are rooms with a dual purpose. if this place is on the shelter map, you can hide there during an alarm.

everyone has the right to be safe. general alnur musaev will be working on espresso tv channel now. former head of the national security committee of kazakhstan, former adviser to the president kazakhstan on the issues of glory to ukraine, alga kazakhstan, glory to the heroes of alga, maybe not too strategic, but putin dared to visit kazakhstan and flew to the kazakh president. putin went there personally, he did not send mishustin, he did not send shoigu. putin doesn't even need kazakhstan's minerals. putin's key task is to ensure that kazakhstan's minerals do not get into other markets, in particular, it is about what, about uranium, about uranium deposits, it is about putin's rare earth metals, where one or the other can come to putin a high-ranking emissary of china.

very true remark, in my years when i was in the government of kazakhstan, these announced interregional contacts between russia and kazakhstan, these territories that are close, were always conducted under the leadership of vice prime ministers, not even prime ministers, but vice prime ministers, always, and what you have rightly noticed right now, putin himself, using this moment, personally arrived, it is very important for him to pull into kazakhstan , all of central asia, he feels that this influence, it is weakening during the period of this almost two-year war,

it is weakening very much, things are no longer going, at the beginning somewhere from the side of russia there was pressure on supplies, even some types of weapons, today there is no question of this, here is this gray import, whether through kazakhstan, kyrgyzstan, other former soviet republics, and this in principle satisfies them, but they will pull kazakhstan into their orbit more strongly , this is very important today's task for russia is known to everyone today, that putin is under threat of arrest, gagksky. of the tribunal, this is the moment, russia, putin, uh, russia insisted that putin meet

such a person personally, it was important for him today, but i am sure that these external, here are these indicative moments from the side of kazakhstan, they are not connected at all , therefore, with the real actions of kazakhstan on the international arena, before that macron was with us, scholz was actively involved in the activities of the european union in the central in asia, as you know, biden hosted all the presidents of the central asian republics in washington, these are the issues of the counteraction of the forces of good, we will call them the forces of evil, they collide on our territory, and i think that the choice of kazakhstan is already clear, what was said to macron , by the actions of kazakhstan, in the political, economic sphere

, in confirmation of cooperation, except for such declared, large ones, the strengthening of cooperation between kazakhstan and russia is not felt, in real cases it is verified how this policy is carried out, kazakhstan in russia's relations? weapons, arsenals of soviet weapons on the territory of kazakhstan, we will dismantle certain trade , let's say, directions on the part of russia, we are talking, in particular, about uranus, how do you think such cases will be resolved, especially with artillery supplies, there is such a problem , that whether on the entire territory of the former soviet republics, and even the eastern european republics, you know, before the aggression in ukraine, russia, and some other republics, including kazakhstan, we had two

very serious ones. emergency incidents to this question: warehouses burned down in orysia, in the chemken region and in another territory , and there are quite serious grounds to suggest that the destruction of huge warehouses of artillery ammunition, as well as in ukraine, by the way, means that the russians are involved in all these cases special services, travel, these movements of employees of the russian federation, in particular, on the territory of kazakhstan, testify to their criminal activity, and i would also note, first time, especially during the twenty-second year, russia, from the central asia, in particular from kazakhstan, too, but