what to expect from such statements and are there any grounds for such fears? well, it is an absolutely objective fact that the aid of our western partners has significantly reduced it once or twice, first of all , the most difficult and most unpleasant for us is the reduction of this aid from the united states, because with all due respect to our european partners, they are not able to us supply. a significant part of what we need, that is, to replace, to replace the united states, in this aid, we objectively have no one, we will to call things their own, they are looking for other options, here it is also about strengthening their own defense and industrial complex, although there are also problems here, they are looking for exits to other countries, to other logistical chains, but it is clear that the key is the help of the united states, whether they are able pull at the same time, conditionally speaking, aid to ukraine, aid to...

israel, possibly increasing aid to taiwan in the face of the threat from china there, and to other partners, because the list of these partners is not exhausted by the list that i cited, and this issue is debatable, i think that in fact, the amount of aid that we have received so far for the united states is not too critical, with all the nuances, with all the difficulties that they objectively face, here the issues are more purely political, actually, and this question... has to do with the closeness of the presidential election and all the kinks, kinks, kinks that come with that, and so i think in the near future, i would say, there's the next few months for us will be very difficult, and the best, smartest, most pragmatic that we are now we have to do, it concerns the military and political leadership, it is trying to calculate our strength at a distance, realizing that in the near future

there will be no increase in this aid, and we must fight at least so that it decreases, less, shrinks less, well, that’s understandable develop other parallel tracks where it is possible to strengthen, you mentioned that with all due respect to european partners, they are trying to look for other ways, and here we mention that today the minister of defense, eu member states met the day before of the minister of foreign affairs, and nato secretary general jen stoltenberg was invited as a guest there, there is already his statement, let's listen and then go to the studio. so far, we do not see a real will on the part of president putin to negotiate a solution acceptable to ukraine. therefore, the only way to achieve this is to convince president putin that he will not win on the battlefield. and the only way to achieve this is to strengthen the military capacity of ukraine, to provide it with support. and here, on the one hand, there is an effort to strengthen the military. possibility

of ukraine, and on the other hand, once again the statement of pistorius, the minister of defense of germany, which was also made today, that the european union will not have time to deliver to ukraine the one million shells that were planned to be delivered by march 2024, or in the context of which we should expect any decisions, any coordination between washington and brussels? you know, this question is more complicated and larger than it seems at first glance, well, first of all, there is an absolutely subjective thing. this subjective thing is called an attempt, let's say, to avoid a certain responsibility, let's call it that, if, god forbid, there, again , we are considering the worst option for ourselves, trump's victory, will this mean a complete stop of military and financial aid, i will remind you that in addition to the fact that the united states provides us with military assistance, they still provide substantial financial assistance, which we unfortunately we also need it, it is clear that

the economy cannot, is not able to fully work in conditions of war. i don't think this suspension will be, shall we say, permanent or permanent, but it is a suspension quite perhaps, and unfortunately, for some european countries, this will be a signal to say that they too have the right to such a suspension. i am not saying that this applies to the point of view of the entire european union, but the countries that are ready to declare this are already there now, and it is a timely job for our diplomats and for our american friends, who have the opportunity to convince their european partners, in the fact that they will have to provide us with a stronger shoulder than they are today, there is a second problem, the problem is objective, if in the united states there is a gradual increase in the production of ammunition, in particular and in general, military equipment , the armament of a whole series of components

of products that we need, it has increased, then in europe it is not happening substantially, in fact, uh, with the exception of some countries , there was no significant increase in production, instead there was a significant increase in prices, to understand, for those who do not know, everything that we need, from a military point of view, in the world, everything increased in price, from two to eight times, and the income of our budget, well, mildly in other words, they do not grow significantly, so we also, that is, there is a part that we receive for free, the so-called material and technical assistance, this is what is given to us for free, but weapons, ammunition, weapons that we buy with our own budget money, yes that's what we buy, firstly, it is very difficult to find it, and secondly, it keeps increasing in price, sometimes very substantially. and unfortunately, our european partners failed to convince their manufacturers, their businesses, to substantially increase the production

of ammunition, weapons, and armaments, which we tolerate, and even where this happens, they take some to replenish their arsenals, because europe, unfortunately, during at least the last. for two decades, it was not arming, it was disarming, and when you promised us a bunch of everything, seeing it on paper, they climbed into their own arsenals of the storage base and found out that either the mice had eaten it, or it had rusted, or it was actually gone, uh, not because they don't want to give us, because it's not there, and they're just now facing new threats and challenges, some of them, some countries began to gradually increase the production of certain products, including weapons, armaments, and ammunition. and they can transfer something to us, and they need something to put in their warehouses, because some of them have already felt, some have not yet felt, some felt that the war has become closer and a full-fledged war in europe is quite possible, not only in ukrainian rams, a little further, and that is why they, to my great regret, when they promised

a million ammunition, well, i took it quite skeptically, to be honest, knowing a little more about their capabilities are real, and here about... the problem is not that we don't get that million , that's quite obvious, the problem is that we still can't get a clear answer as to how much we will be given and what exactly, uh, it's not even about the amount, even about the specification, about the nomenclature of these munitions, we politely and respectfully to our partners, understanding that they are not obliged to give us all this, it is their good will, and we are grateful to them for that, but in view of the complexity of this war, the complexity the adversary with whom we are at war, we still ask, tell us please, what can we count on, in what terms and for what exactly, to our great regret , we have not received this answer from them yet, our american partners are still reducing our aid, for objective and subjective reasons,

we are at least informed about what is decreasing, how it is decreasing in connection with what, with european partners , i say once again, with all due respect, this is not a criticism of them, this is a statement of fact, perhaps unpleasant, but such things also need to be discussed talk, they are not with us for... enough frank and not always disciplined in our relations with them. listen, mr. serhiy, thank you very much for the extremely interesting conversation, thank you for taking the time to visit us. serhii rakhmanin, people's deputy from the voice faction and member of the defense committee of the verkhovna rada, was a guest of our studio today, let's move on. a short but very intense visit to washington, that's how the meeting of the ukrainian delegation in the capital of the usa, vice prime minister yulia, summed up. according to her , the main topic raised at the meeting with the american officials is this direct budgetary support of ukraine for the next year. at the same time, they talked about the formula for peace and strengthening the defense of ukraine. in particular, the head of the president's office andriy yarmak, who is also part of the delegation, met with the white house national security advisor jake

sullivan. the latter admitted to his word that the lack of funding has already undermined ukraine's ability to repel russian aggression. every week our ability is completely. fund what we think is necessary to give ukraine the tools and capabilities it needs to defend its territory and beyond intelligence is decreasing, it's getting harder and harder, so the window of opportunity is closing for us, but i can say that it's already affecting our ability to provide ukraine with everything it needs. oleg shamshur, ambassador of ukraine to the united states in 2006-10 joins our broadcast. mr. oleg, good evening, my greetings. good evening. and what are sullivan's statements, how should they be regarded and what will actually happen with the help from the white house, what are your predictions? eh, how to perceive, well, how to perceive, i basically, what sullivan says,

it reflects reality and corresponds to it, the situation is very difficult, precisely because of the fact that the money that was there, there really is very little left, well, relatively little, for the next financial year, which has already begun, more money is needed, how much.. . is formulated in the request of president biden, and if in the near future, and this is what sullivan talked about, the appropriate decisions will not be made by the congress of the united states, then indeed the situation will become even more complicated, will become even more unfavorable for us, that is, now is the key to solving the problem, which exists, it is the corresponding decisions at the level of the house of representatives, where

the situation is most difficult, and the senate, that is, the congress of the united states. mr. olezh, the head of the president's office said that 2024 will be a decisive year, a turning point is approaching, but since 2023 has already been talked about as a decisive year, what is the purpose of such statements and do they affect the american political community? i think that these statements are intended not so much for the american politicians as for the ukrainian public, that is, they have the right to exist in order to raise, well, the spirit, i would said, ukrainian society, uh, emotionally, it, we all see it, we ourselves are a part of this society, it is in a bad state.

although it is very important that the determination remains to go to the end, to fight against the russian invaders, as far as influencing the american political community is concerned, i do not think, even if this is such a goal, that it will in any way affect, including , the solution of those problems that that currently exist in the legislature and that exist in the relationship between congress and the white house, in this regard, i think that it will really to influence, and in general, if we talk about the definition of some goals, that it will definitely be, here i would be very careful, including communicating with ukrainian society, because it is very important not to lose the public's trust in what they say , as they say, mozhanovites.

mr. olezh, we will now return to the conversation, we just now want to add to the broadcast my colleague from the voice of america, maria ulyanovska, a correspondent of the ukrainian service of the voice of america, and she will share with us the information that they are writing about the visit the ukrainian delegation, the american media, how do the words of the white house react to the impact of the reduction of us aid on the course of the russian-ukrainian war, and actually, is there progress in the adoption of the aid package for mari, congratulations, you have the word, i congratulate you, but there is no progress yet , but now is really such an important moment, because by the end of this week, the us congress has to decide the fate of this large-scale additional aid package that was proposed by the administration of president biden, which includes aid for ukraine, or to vote for a temporary resolution to extend this transition period simply to avoid a shutdown , this resolution will be considered today, that is, today it will be known whether the legislators will extend this period for themselves, or whether they will still try to solve all the issues and

pass the budget by this friday, it will already be known today, however, it is really important that right now the ukrainian delegation is in washington, as we know, today the representative, the head of the president's office andriy yermak will have personal meetings with congressmen and senators, and he will try to convince them that it is necessary to vote for the allocation of aid to ukraine for ukraine for the next year, because this issue is now very important, as john kirby said recently, the funds that were allocated for ukraine already expire and by the end of this year they will expire, so we need to continue to help ukraine right now, and in particular he is in all his meetings, we know that he met with anthony blinken, the us secretary of state, he met with the us national security by jake salyon. the national security advisors of three other countries, namely great britain, france and germany, were also present at this meeting. where he already discussed some bilateral agreements on security guarantees for

ukraine. and among the important messages that he is delivering here in washington is that the next year will be decisive in russia's war against ukraine, and that he is saying that most of the way has already been traveled and there is no stopping now because russia is consolidating around herself, she is such an axis of evil, as he said consolidates around itself these authoritarian regimes, terrorist regimes, marginal individuals. and it opposes the free world, this coalition opposes the free world, so the free world and ukraine cannot afford to get tired now, as he said, and we must continue to support ukraine. it is necessary to help ukraine win the war, because if ukraine wins the war, then the whole free world is built on rules, i suggest listening to his words. two years after the start of a full-scale war, russia is still not defeated, and even more so, in the midst of the tide

fake messages coming out of moscow, one thing is definitely true: they are not going to stop, they hope to wait out the unity of democracy, they understand that their... success depends on whether the west prefers reality to politics based on values. today's russia is a state built for confrontation, this means one thing, we cannot afford to be tired, none of us, ukraine will stand and win, stand and win, order is built on rules, as ronald reagan said, we have come to a time of choice, next or up to freedom of law and order, or down to totalitarianism. indeed, he emphasizes that ukraine has already proven that the impossible is possible, ukraine continues to fight for the second year in this war of aggression against russia, and he once again expressed his gratitude to america for its leadership, he emphasized that such a victory for ukraine, and such a confrontation would not be possible without the help of allies, and he expressed his gratitude to america, in particular, for being the leader in

this assistance, but again, as ukraine has continued to do for some time, he conveys the message that this is not charity, that this is an investment in the future, because all these countries that are allies of ukraine also benefit from helping ukraine, because ukraine is fighting not only for its existence, but ukraine is fighting for the existence of a free world built on rules thank you maria, maria ulyanovska, a correspondent of the ukrainian voice of america service, was in direct contact with us. thank you. thank you for your trust and we are waiting for your comments under this broadcast, your opinion is important to us, see you as always svoboda live will be broadcast tomorrow, let's hold on. the story of new york girlfriends continues on mghogo. turn on the new chapter of the adventures of kerry, miranda and charlotte, and just

like that, watch hbo in ukrainian, before the world is changing, and so is castrol, we are moving forward and boldly innovating, testing the limits and accelerating progress. castrol is a brave person who is consciously on the path of change, that vasyu, drinking an antibiotic, ran into your stomach, and you girls, how and how, how after the antibiotic , how, ran through like that. big broadcast of vasyl zima, my name is vasyl zima, two hours of broadcast of time, two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important thing, two hours to learn about the war, serhiy sgurets joins our broadcast, the military results of the day, and what the world is like, what yuliy fisel will tell about in the world, two hours to be in course

of economic news, i will give the floor to oleksandr morchyvka, he will talk about the economy during the war and sports news, he is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favorite presenters. lina cheshenina is ready to talk about culture during the war. leading that many became similar. maybe the weather will at least give us some optimism. mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us. and also distinguished guests of the studio. we will have volodymyrka today, if all goes well. events of the day in two hours. vasyl winter's big broadcast. a project for smart and caring people. espresso in the evening. the war in ukraine, the main topic for ukrainians, victories and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics, serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this, people who have information and shape public opinion, people who defend ukraine and create the future right now, the main and interesting thing in the program verdict with serhiy

rudenko, from monday to friday, at 20:00. on november 25, 2013 , a convoy of five hundred opposition forces marched to the building of the cabinet of ministers. the protesters wanted to express their disagreement with the government's decision to suspend the process of preparation for signing the association agreement with the european union. by evening on euromaidan and european square, the number of people increases to several thousand. cleaning the so-called maidan. from the activists, it started around 4 in the morning, then there were about 400 protesters on duty, mostly students, they slept in tents, then the square... that was surrounded by armed fighters of the special battalion. on december 8 , 2013, a march of millions passed through the streets of the capital. the protests continued until late at night, and on this very day activists toppled

a monument to lenin in the center of the capital on besararab square. the shelter is in poor condition. where to apply? check the shelter yourself. instructions from the toringu ozon community group will help with this. download it, check the shelter and pass the information to the representatives of the state administration in your area. they will convey the comments to the person responsible for the condition of the shelter, the balance to the recipient and will monitor the performance and quality of the work. everyone has the right to try safely. greetings, yesterday i already said how the russian propagandists started, in essence, such a global campaign in collusion, in relation to, such

an attempt to push the idea of ​​some negotiations with russia about something, well, actually, let's take a closer look at how it all is today is happening in the international media, well, first of all, a bunch of articles came out that very well fit into the theses of russian propaganda , that it is very difficult for ukraine to fight there, and therefore it should not be supported, because russia has great resources, it is difficult to defeat her there, well, and so on, so on, all this has now poured into the world media, simply en masse. frankfurter, algemai calls on the west to stop hoping for a miracle in ukraine after the failure of the contour offensive, the observer calls for peace negotiations altogether. notes that the americans used ukraine as a battering ram against russia, and it seems that the battering ram has already been broken into pieces, that is, the kiev regime, as if pouring out, still melted the ukrainian authorities,

and the west has nothing to do with it, and the russians dragged everything out like their old selves agents, a whole bunch who are now telling something on various broadcasts, and a bunch of new ones with whom , apparently, they just started to cooperate, for example, here is one of their possessions, apparently, even some nato official, former , obviously, because it's like as a rule, they pick up a bunch of such strange former people, who came out and began to tell an enchanting story about the fact that it turns out that the russians do not specifically blow up the bridges over the dnieper, you remember, yes, that year they tell on all the airs, no matter how they wanted to do it, and that they simply cannot do it, because they do not have the appropriate weapons for it. but where they could have blown up, they could have blown up kakhovskaya hess, they blew it up, they could have blown up something else, they could, they would have blown up there too, but no, some regular russian

agent got out and is now telling such stories, and the russians have not yet used their own superiority in long-range means of destruction for strikes on the infrastructure that connects the right-bank ukraine with the left-bank. there is another factor of uncertainty: the dnieper is a large, wide water barrier in some places several kilometers wide. huyat revealed the reason why the russian army does not destroy the bridges across the dnieper. the general is convinced that russia itself will use them, wait not long. the dnieper is a wide river, in some places the distance between the banks is several kilometers. the russians have not yet destroyed all the bridges across the dnieper, but their however, there are about twenty along the entire front line, and it would be a great advantage for the russian army if they did this, because then they would significantly complicate the supply and logistics of the ukrainian troops,

which means that we must expect that the russians themselves have in mind to force the dnieper . perhaps the russians could cross the river on bridges, to capture all of ukraine? why don't the russians bomb the bridges across the dnieper? this is a serious puzzle for western military experts, but the russian general staff must have its own secrets. well, of course, this general should first look at the map and see that these bridges are very, very far for the russians, not only about forcing the dnieper, but they also go there, well, how to heaven on foot, but they climb out and they pull them out, tell all these legends, and all this is just to tell how powerful russia is, well, i i say, if we learned to look at least at the map, it would probably be easier to understand that something is being done or not being done. eh, but, in the end, what did he say all this for, and where it is immediately clear that this person, well, is simply working for the russians, is when he starts

repeating. a well-known russian fake about the fact that everything was already agreed in istanbul, once there on march 22, 2022, but then someone intervened and literally did not allow a favorable agreement for the russians to be concluded, but as soon as a person starts saying this, it is immediately clear , that it was simply written directly to her russian propagandists. the war could end about six weeks after it started. intensive negotiations initiated by the president of turkey took place, the parties managed to achieve good results for ukraine. on april 9, johnson came to kyiv in order to prevent the signing. the peace treaty was not signed under the pressure of the collective west, namely under the pressure of some nato countries led by the usa. well, from this point of view, we should thank the collective event, because it turns out that it was he who was involved in the fact that we liberated kyivska, chernihiv, sumy region, kherson city,

kharkiv region. almost all of it, but thanks to the intervention it turns out to be a collective action, but you see, well, it doesn’t work in my head , it turns out that it is now, you know, this kind of important message, which russian propaganda is trying to spread, says what exactly from that is how orban comes out, who starts, this is the prime minister of hungary, who starts to say the same thing, and the question is probably the same that can be asked to him, and why... ukraine should have gone for it if after that she freed such a huge territory of her own, it doesn't even come up, but they all talk about this technique, probably she, this little girl is very important for the russians now, if they let some former general talk about it, and then orbán too. first, macron announces that next december will be decisive, while kiev is not ready for negotiations, but they can start in the near future, then orban answers him in absentia,

ukraine was ready to sign peace even in istanbul, but everything failed due to interference americans, that is, europeans, may try to play shuttle diplomacy, but if biden does not decide that it is time to end, any demand will be thwarted. well, in the end, another asset, according to all the russians, is one of the candidates for the presidency of the united states, ravaswamy, who, suddenly , unexpectedly, it turns out that he cooperates perfectly with russian television, and this russian television even travels with him on a campaign tour. our own correspondent from the usa, vyvik ramaswamy, met with disturbing calmness, landed at the golf club in new hampshire. the motto of the company is one word: truth. russia and china are salivating at the thought of someone like that becoming the american president. is he really that malleable - we ask vyvyk hotly. if you

become the president of the united states, you will meet with vladimir putin, and what will you say to him? we need a reasonable policy that puts the interests of the united states first, this is my moral obligation as president, we need a reasonable path to a peace agreement that is fraught with obligations on all sides. nato must promise not to include ukraine in the alliance, this is a basic commitment, nato must give it and the usa will confirm it. must withdraw from the military alliance with china, restore economic relations between america and russia, and remove the military presence from the western hemisphere. well, that is, another great geostrategist, it turns out, does not know that russia does not have any military treaty with china, that’s all, they did not conclude such a treaty, so there is nothing to get out of, well, such a trifle, again , but you see, canned goods are all right

they open up once again, often both the dead and the unborn , and at the same time, an article published by the washington post and spiegel, which is very beneficial for the russians, about the sabotage of the northern poto streams, and this can be said to be such an old fake under a new sign, in may already this year, one german publication, and another one, zodoicha tsatunk, published a similar article accusing the ukrainian special services of blowing up gas pipelines, and this article, which was published then, was about something in general, and now it is practically the same is told in these new articles, but there is an addition, but returning to zudoi ch